ML16349A147: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML16349A147
| number = ML16349A147
| issue date = 12/09/2016
| issue date = 12/09/2016
| title = Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 - Acceptance for Review - Request to Change the Completion Date of Cyber Security Plan Implementation Milestone 8 (CAC No. MF8846)
| title = Acceptance for Review - Request to Change the Completion Date of Cyber Security Plan Implementation Milestone 8
| author name = Schaaf R G
| author name = Schaaf R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| addressee name = Gordon A D, Russell D
| addressee name = Gordon A, Russell D
| addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
| addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
| docket = 05000391
| docket = 05000391
| license number = CPPR-092
| license number = CPPR-092
| contact person = Schaaf R G, 415-6020
| contact person = Schaaf R, 415-6020
| case reference number = CAC MF8846
| case reference number = CAC MF8846
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = CAC:MF8846
| project = CAC:MF8846
| stage =  
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Schaaf, RobertTo:Gordon Arent; Wells, Russell DouglasCc:Saba, Farideh; Nadel, Jared; "Edmondson, Carla"; Dion, JeanneSubject:Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 2 - Acceptance for Review - Request to Change the Completion Date of CyberSecurity Plan Implementation Milestone 8 (CAC No. MF8846)Date:Friday, December 09, 2016 1:29:52 PMGentlemen, By letter dated November 14, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and ManagementSystem (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16320A161), the Tennessee Valley Authority submitted an amendment request for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN), Unit 2. Theproposed amendment would revise the WBN Unit 2 Cyber Security Plan (CSP)Implementation Schedule for Milestone 8 and update the Facility Operating License. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide you with the results of the Nuclear RegulatoryCommission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this submittal. The acceptance review wasperformed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review isalso intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent informationinsufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technicalreview and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposedamendment in terms of regulatory requirements and protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review ascompared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues thatimpact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any furtherinformation needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separatecorrespondence.
{{#Wiki_filter:From:
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimatedthat this licensing request will take approximately 80 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 3 months, which is March2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that wouldcause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will becommunicated during routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
Schaaf, Robert To:
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application andthey could change, due to several factors including requests for additionalinformation, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if thesubmittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry programinitiatives or pilot applications.
Gordon Arent; Wells, Russell Douglas Cc:
If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-6020. Regards,Robert G. Schaaf Robert G. SchaafSenior Project Manager, Watts Bar/Bellefonte----------------------------------------------------------------Plant Licensing Branch II-2Division of Operating Reactor LicensingOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionMail Stop O-8G9AWashington, DC 20555----------------------------------------------------------------301-415-6020 (o)Robert.Schaaf@nrc.gov  
Saba, Farideh; Nadel, Jared; "Edmondson, Carla"; Dion, Jeanne
}}
 
==Subject:==
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 2 - Acceptance for Review - Request to Change the Completion Date of Cyber Security Plan Implementation Milestone 8 (CAC No. MF8846)
Date:
Friday, December 09, 2016 1:29:52 PM Gentlemen, By {{letter dated|date=November 14, 2016|text=letter dated November 14, 2016}} (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16320A161), the Tennessee Valley Authority submitted an amendment request for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN), Unit 2. The proposed amendment would revise the WBN Unit 2 Cyber Security Plan (CSP)
Implementation Schedule for Milestone 8 and update the Facility Operating License. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide you with the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 80 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 3 months, which is March 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-6020.
: Regards, Robert G. Schaaf
 
Robert G. Schaaf Senior Project Manager, Watts Bar/Bellefonte Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-8G9A Washington, DC 20555 301-415-6020 (o)
Robert.Schaaf@nrc.gov}}

Latest revision as of 16:15, 9 January 2025

Acceptance for Review - Request to Change the Completion Date of Cyber Security Plan Implementation Milestone 8
ML16349A147
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 12/09/2016
From: Robert Schaaf
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Gordon A, Russell D
Tennessee Valley Authority
Schaaf R, 415-6020
References
CAC MF8846
Download: ML16349A147 (2)


Text

From:

Schaaf, Robert To:

Gordon Arent; Wells, Russell Douglas Cc:

Saba, Farideh; Nadel, Jared; "Edmondson, Carla"; Dion, Jeanne

Subject:

Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 2 - Acceptance for Review - Request to Change the Completion Date of Cyber Security Plan Implementation Milestone 8 (CAC No. MF8846)

Date:

Friday, December 09, 2016 1:29:52 PM Gentlemen, By letter dated November 14, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16320A161), the Tennessee Valley Authority submitted an amendment request for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN), Unit 2. The proposed amendment would revise the WBN Unit 2 Cyber Security Plan (CSP)

Implementation Schedule for Milestone 8 and update the Facility Operating License. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide you with the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this submittal. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 3 months, which is March 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-6020.

Regards, Robert G. Schaaf

Robert G. Schaaf Senior Project Manager, Watts Bar/Bellefonte Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-8G9A Washington, DC 20555 301-415-6020 (o)

Robert.Schaaf@nrc.gov