ML17130A281: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17130A281
| number = ML17130A281
| issue date = 04/06/2017
| issue date = 04/06/2017
| title = Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 & 3, Revision 26 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Appendix C, Structural Design Criteria, Figure C.2.1 Through Figure C.3.12L
| title = 6 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Appendix C, Structural Design Criteria, Figure C.2.1 Through Figure C.3.12L
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC
| author affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Note: Figure C.3.12 is not applicable to Main Steam Line Piping Inside Containment.             For MSL Inside Containment, See Figure C.3.12J, C.3.12K and C.3.12L.REV 25,   APRIL 2015  
{{#Wiki_filter:Note: Figure C.3.12 is not applicable to Main Steam Line Piping Inside Containment.
For MSL Inside Containment, See Figure C.3.12J, C.3.12K and C.3.12L.
REV 25, APRIL 2015


PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 2 AND 32% DAMPED SPECTRAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TARGET DE RESPONSE SPECTRUM AND SPECTRUM FROM TAFT TIME HISTORY (AFTER SCALING)
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 2 AND 3 2% DAMPED SPECTRAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TARGET DE RESPONSE SPECTRUM AND SPECTRUM FROM TAFT TIME HISTORY (AFTER SCALING)
FIGURE C.3.12J                 REV. 25   APRIL 2015 FIGURE C.3.12K                 REV. 25   APRIL 2% DAMPED SPECTRAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TARGET MCE RESPONSE SPECTRUM AND SPECTRUM FROM TAFT TIME HISTORY (AFTER SCALING)PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 2 AND 3 PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 2 AND 35% DAMPED SPECTRAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TARGET MCE RESPONSE SPECTRUM AND SPECTRUM FROM TAFT TIME HISTORY (AFTER SCALING)
FIGURE C.3.12J REV. 25 APRIL 2015  
FIGURE C.3.12L                 REV. 25   APRIL 2015}}
 
FIGURE C.3.12K REV. 25 APRIL 2% DAMPED SPECTRAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TARGET MCE RESPONSE SPECTRUM AND SPECTRUM FROM TAFT TIME HISTORY (AFTER SCALING)
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 2 AND 3
 
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 2 AND 3 5% DAMPED SPECTRAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TARGET MCE RESPONSE SPECTRUM AND SPECTRUM FROM TAFT TIME HISTORY (AFTER SCALING)
FIGURE C.3.12L REV. 25 APRIL 2015}}

Latest revision as of 08:28, 9 January 2025

6 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Appendix C, Structural Design Criteria, Figure C.2.1 Through Figure C.3.12L
ML17130A281
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/06/2017
From:
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17130A259 List: ... further results
References
Download: ML17130A281 (26)


Text

Note: Figure C.3.12 is not applicable to Main Steam Line Piping Inside Containment.

For MSL Inside Containment, See Figure C.3.12J, C.3.12K and C.3.12L.

REV 25, APRIL 2015

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 2 AND 3 2% DAMPED SPECTRAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TARGET DE RESPONSE SPECTRUM AND SPECTRUM FROM TAFT TIME HISTORY (AFTER SCALING)

FIGURE C.3.12J REV. 25 APRIL 2015

FIGURE C.3.12K REV. 25 APRIL 2% DAMPED SPECTRAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TARGET MCE RESPONSE SPECTRUM AND SPECTRUM FROM TAFT TIME HISTORY (AFTER SCALING)

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 2 AND 3

PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 2 AND 3 5% DAMPED SPECTRAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TARGET MCE RESPONSE SPECTRUM AND SPECTRUM FROM TAFT TIME HISTORY (AFTER SCALING)

FIGURE C.3.12L REV. 25 APRIL 2015