ML17319A852: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 03/02/1981
| issue date = 03/02/1981
| title = Forwards Public Version of Addl Info to Be Inserted in 810102 Revised Emergency Plan
| title = Forwards Public Version of Addl Info to Be Inserted in 810102 Revised Emergency Plan
| author name = HUNTER R S
| author name = Hunter R
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| addressee name = DENTON H R
| addressee name = Denton H
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| docket = 05000315, 05000316
| docket = 05000315, 05000316
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P.0.BOX 18 BOWLING.GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N.Y.10004 March 2, 1981 AEP:NRC:00308F Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket Nos.50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.OPR-58 and DPR-74 EMERGENCY PLAN INSERTS Mt.Harold R.Oenton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555  
{{#Wiki_filter:INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P. 0.
BOX 18 BOWLING.GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N. Y. 10004 March 2, 1981 AEP:NRC:00308F Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos.
1 and 2
Docket Nos.
50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.
OPR-58 and DPR-74 EMERGENCY PLAN INSERTS Mt. Harold R. Oenton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555


==Dear Mr.Denton:==
==Dear Mr. Denton:==
The attachments to this letter transmit the additional information committed to by the submittal of our Emergency Plan under AEP:NRC:00308B, dated January 26, 1981.Since this information is an insert to the original documents we have transmitted to you, we are not treating this as a formal revision or change to the documents you now have.One control copy and nine additional copies of the inserts are being sent to you.Three copies of the inserts are also being transmitted to the NRC Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement under separate cover.Very truly yours,.S.Hunter Vice President cc: John E.Dolan R.W.Jurgensen R.C.Callen G.Charnoff D.V.Shaller-Bridgman NRC Region III Resident Inspector-Bridgman NRC Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement yDC5 i/(o PERSONAL PRIVACY INPORIATION DELETED IN ACCORDANCE 5ITH THE FREEDOM Or XmZOZ,mTION ACX ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC;0308F PERSONAL PRIVACY INFORMATION DELETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZBEMOM OF INFORMATION ACT TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd.)Title Pacae 12.3.4.1 Interagency Radiological Assistance Plan (IRAP)'12.3.4.2 Off-Site Representatives 12.3.4.3 Off-Site Agencies and Organizations 12.3'EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPORT AND RESOURCES 12.3-48 12.3-49 12.3-52 12.3-52 12.3.5.3 Emergency Protective Action Guidelines
The attachments to this letter transmit the additional information committed to by the submittal of our Emergency Plan under AEP:NRC:00308B, dated January 26, 1981.
-All Classifications-Gaseous Release (Four Charts)12.3.5 EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 12.3.5.1 Emergency Action Levels 12.3.5.2 Protective Actions 12.3-54 12.3-55 12.3-56 12.3-58 12.3.5.4 Emergency Protective Action Guidelines
Since this information is an insert to the original documents we have transmitted to you, we are not treating this as a formal revision or change to the documents you now have.
-All Clc.ssifications-Liquid Releases 12.3-62 12.3.5.5 Initiating Conditions 12.3.5.6 Example Events 12.3.5.7 Emergency Classification of FSAR Postulated Transients 12.3-63 12.3-68 12.3-74 12.3.6.1 Notification of Emergency Response Personnel and Organizations 12.3.6.1.1 On-Site 12.3.6.1.2 Off-Site (Plant Staff)12.3.6.1.3 Off-Site Response Organizations 12.3.6 NOTIFICATION METHODS AND PROCEDURES 12.3-92 12.3-93 12.3-93 12.3-94 12.3-95 12.3.6.2 Levels of Implementation for Alerting, Notifying and Mobilizing Response Personnel 12.3-97 Revision 0 March 1, 1981
One control copy and nine additional copies of the inserts are being sent to you.
Three copies of the inserts are also being transmitted to the NRC Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement under separate cover.
Very truly yours, S. Hunter Vice President cc:
John E. Dolan R.
W. Jurgensen R.
C. Callen G. Charnoff D. V. Shaller - Bridgman NRC Region III Resident Inspector - Bridgman NRC Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement yDC5 i/(o PERSONAL PRIVACYINPORIATION DELETED IN ACCORDANCE5ITH THE FREEDOM Or XmZOZ,mTION ACX


12.3.5.5 Initiatin Conditions 12.3.5.5.1 Unusual Event Initiatin Criteria 1.ECCS initiated 2.Radiological effluent technical specification limits exceeded 3.Fuel damage indication.
ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC;0308F PERSONAL PRIVACY INFORMATION DELETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZBEMOMOF INFORMATIONACT
Examples: a.High coolant activity sample (e.g., exceed-ing coolant technical specifications for iodine spike)b.Failed fuel monitor (PWR)indicates increase greater than 0.1%equivalent fuel failures within 30 minutes.4.'Abnormal coolant temperature and/or pressure or abnormal fuel temperatures 5.Exceeding either primary/secondary leak rate technical specification or primary system leak rate technical specification.
C 6.Failure of a safety or relief valve to close 7.Loss of offsite power or loss of onsite AC power capability 8.Loss of containment integrity requiring shut-down by technical specifications 9.Loss of engineered safety feature or fire protection system function requiring shutdown by technical specifications (e.g., because of 12.3-63 Revision 0 March 1, 1981


malfunction, personnel error or procedural inadequacy) 10.Fire lasting more than 10 minutes 11.Indications or alarms on process or effluent parameters not functional in control room to an extent requiring plant shutdown or other significant loss of assessment or communication capability (e.g., plant computer, all meteoro-logical instrumentation) 12.Security threat or attempted entry or attempted sabotage 13.Uncontrolled rod'withdrawal from a subcritical condition 14..Uncontrolled rod withdrawal at power 15.Dropped RCCA assembly.:
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd.)
or bank 16.Uncontrolled dilution 17.Loss of one or more reactor coolant pumps above 50%power 18.Excessive Tavg-Tref Deviation 19.Natural phenomenon M.ing experienced or projected beyond usual levels a.Any earthquake b.50 year flood or low water, t'sunami, hurricane surge, seiche c., Any tornado near site d.Any hurricane 12.3-64 Revision 0 March 1, 1981
Title Pacae 12.3.4.1 Interagency Radiological Assistance Plan (IRAP)
.0 20.Other hazards being experienced or projected a.Aircraft crash on-site or unusual aircraft activity over facility b.Train derailment on-site c.Near or on-site explosion d.Near or on-site toxic or flammable gas release e.Turbine failure 21.Other plant conditions exist that warrant increased awareness on the part, of State and/or local offsite authorities or require plant shut-down under technical specification requirements or involve other than normal controlled shutdown (e.g., cooldown rate exceeding technical specifi-cation limits, pipe cracking found during oper-ation)22.Transportation of contaminated injured individual from site to offsite hospital 23.Rapid depressurization of PWR secondary side.12.3.5.5.2 Alert Initiatin Criteria 1.Loss of one fission product barrier-a.~300~Ci/cc I-131 coolant sample b.~50 gpm Primary Coolant Leak Rate c.Loss of containment integrity 12.3-65 Revision 0 March 1, 1981 2.Inoperability of a single complete safety system and which cannot be returned to operable within 15 minutes a.ECCS subsystems b.Containment Spray c.Diesels d.Control Room Evacuation e.Batteries 3.O 2 mR/hr at Site Boundary under actual conditions 4.Other hazards, occurrences, or natural phenomena experienced on-site warranting activation of off-site response forces 12.3.5.5.3 Site Emer enc Initiatin Criteria 1.Loss of or potential loss of two fission prod~et barriers.a.~300~Ci/cc coolant sample (I-131)b.~50 gpm primary coolant.leak c.Loss of containment integrity 2.Loss of one fission product barrier as above combined with inoperability of a single complete safety system when needed, or which cannot be restored operable within 1S minutes a.ECCS subsystem b.Containment Spray c.Diesels 12.3-66 Revision 0 March 1, 1981 I (
'12.3.4.2 Off-Site Representatives 12.3.4.3 Off-Site Agencies and Organizations 12.3 '
d.Control Room Evacuated e.Batteries OR inoperability of two complete safety systems when needed 3.~50 mR/hr whole body at site boundary under existing conditions
EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPORT AND RESOURCES
~250 mR/hr thyroid at site boundary under existing conditions 4.Natural phenomena experienced beyond design basis levels.Other hazards: Winds, tornado, Earthquake 5.Other conditions occurring on-site warranting notification of the public to take precautionary measures or prepare to take such measures.12.3.5.5.4 General Emer enc Xnitiatinq Criteria 1.Loss of or potential loss of'fission product.barriers a.~300 aCi/cc I-131 coolant sample b.~50 gpm primary leak rate c.Loss of containment integrity 2.Loss of two fission product barriers combined with inoperability of single complete safety system, when needed or which cannot be restored to operable within 15 minutes a.ECCS subsystem b.Containment Spray 12.3-67 Revision 0 March.l, 1981 c.Diesel s d.Control Room Evacuated e.Batteries 3.N1 R/hr whole body at site boundary under existing conditions
: 12. 3-48
~5 R/hr thyroid at site boundary under existing conditions 4.Other plant conditions exist that make release of large amounts of radioactivity in a short time possible.12.3.5.6 Exam le Events 12.3.5.6.1 Exam le Alert Initiatin Events 1.Severe loss of fuel cladding a.Very high coolan'ctivity sample (e.g., 300wCi/cc equivalent of I-131)b.Failed fuel monitor.(PWR)indicates increase greater than 1%fuel failures within 30 minutes or 5%total fuel failures 2.Rapid gross failure of one or more steam generator tubes with or without 3,oss of offsite power 3.Steam line break with significant (e.g., greater than 10 gpm)primary to secondary leak rate or with MS'XV malfunction 4.Primary coolant leak rate greater than 50 gpm 12.3-68 Revision 0 March 1, 1981 I
: 12. 3-49 12.3-52 12.3-52 12.3.5.3 Emergency Protective Action Guidelines All Classifications Gaseous Release (Four Charts)
~~5.High radiation levels or high airborne con-tamination which indicate a severe degradation in the control of radioactive materials (e.g., increase of factor of 1000 in direct radiation readings)6.Loss of offsite power and loss of all onsite AC power 7.Loss of all onsite DC power 8.Coolant pump seizure leading to fuel failure 9.Loss of functions needed for plant cold shutdown 10.Fuel damage accident with release of radio-activity to containment or fuel handling building 11.Fire potentially affecting safety systems 12.All alarms (annunciators) lost 13.Radiological effluents'greater than 10 times technical specification instantaneous limits (an instantaneous rate which, if continued over 2 hours, would result in about 1 mR at the site boundary under average meteorological conditions) 14.Ongoing security compromise 15.Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected a.Earthquake greater than OBE levels b.Flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane surge, seiche near design levels 12.3-69 Revision 0 March 1, 1981 I
: 12. 3. 5 EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 12.3.5.1 Emergency Action Levels 12.3.5.2 Protective Actions 12.3-54 12.3-55 12.3-56 12.3-58 12.3.5.4 Emergency Protective Action Guidelines All Clc.ssifications-Liquid Releases
c.Any tornado striking facility d.Hurricane winds near design basis level 16.Other hazards being experienced or projected a.Aircraft crash on facility b.Missile impacts from whatever source on facility c.Known explosion damage to facility affect-ing plant operation d.Entry into facility environs of toxic or flammable gases e.Turbine failure causing casing penetration 17.Other plant conditions exist that warrant.precautionary activation of technical support center and near-site emergency operations center 18.Evacuation of control room anticipated or required with control of shutdown systems established from local stations 12.3.5.6.2 Exam le Site Emer enc Initiatin Events 1.Degraded core with possible loss of eoolable.geometry (indicators should include instru-mentation to detect inadequate core cooling, coolant activity and/or containment radio-activity levels)2.Rapid failure of more than 10 steam generator tubes with loss of offsite power 12.3-70 Revision 0 March 1, 1981 3.PWR steam line break with greater than 50 gpm primary to secondary leakage and significant indication of fuel damage 4.Loss of offsite power and loss of onsite AC power for more than 15 minutes 5.Loss of all vital onsite DC power for more than 15 minutes 6.Loss of functions needed for plant hot shut-down 7.Fire affecting safety systems 8.All alarms (annunciators) lost for'ore than 15 minutes and plant is not in cold shutdown or plant transient initiated while all alarms lost 9.a.Effluent monitors detect levels correspond-ing to greater than 50 mR/hr for 4 hour or greater than 500 mR/hr W.B.for two minutes (or five times these.levels to the thyroid)at'the site boundary for existing meteorology b.These dose rates're projected based on other plant parameters (e.g., radiation level in containment.
: 12. 3-62 12.3.5.5 Initiating Conditions 12.3.5.6 Example Events 12.3.5.7 Emergency Classification of FSAR Postulated Transients 12.3-63 12.3-68
with leak rate appro-priate for existing containment pressure)or are measured in the environs 10.Imminent loss of physical control of the plant 12.3-71 Revision 0 March 1, 1981
: 12. 3-74 12.3.6.1 Notification of Emergency


11.Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown a.Earthquake greater than SSE levels b.Flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane surge, seiche greater than design levels or failure of protection of vital equipment at lower levels c.Winds in excess of design levels 12.Other hazards being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown a.Aircraft crash affecting vital structures by impact or fire b.Severe damage to safe shutdown equipment from missiles or explosion c.Entry of toxic or flammable gases vital areas 13.Other plant conditions exist that warrant activation of emergency centers and monitor-ing teams and a precautionary public notifi-cation 14.Evacuation of control room and control of shutdown systems not established from local stations in 15 minutes 12.3.5.6.3 Exam le General Emer enc Initiatin Events 1.Small and large LOCA's with failure of ECCS to perform leading to severe core degradation 12.3-72 Revision 0 March 1, 1981 or melt.Ultimate failure of containment likely for melt sequences.(Several hours available for response)2.Transient initiated by loss of feedwater and condensate systems (principal heat removal system)followed by failure of emergency feed-water system for extended period.Core melting possible in several hours.Ultimate failure of containment likely if core melts.3.Transient requiring operation of shutdown systems with failure to scram.Core damage for some designs.Additional failure of core cooling and makeup systems would lead to core melt.4.Failure of offsite and onsite power along with total loss of emergency feedwater makeup capability for several hours would lead to eventual core melt and likely failure of con-tainment.5..Small LOCA and initially successful ECCS.Subsequent failure of containment heat removal systems over several hours could lead to core melt and likely failure of containment.
===Response===
12~3 73 Revision 0 March 1, 1981 12.3.5.7 Emergency Classification of FSAR Postulated Transients The FSAR postulated transients are classified into emergency event categories as indicated below.The transients are bounded by the conditions set forth in Chapter 14 of the FSAR.Reference to the applic-able FSAR section is indicated by the number in ()~FSAR Event Descri tion Emergency Classification Example No.1.Uncontrolled Rod Withdrawal (subcritical)
Personnel and Organizations 12.3.6.1.1 On-Site 12.3.6.1.2 Off-Site (Plant Staff) 12.3.6.1.3 Off-Site Response Organizations 12.3.6 NOTIFICATION METHODS AND PROCEDURES 12.3-92 12.3-93
(14.1.1).Unusual Event 13 2.Uncontrolled Rod Withdrawal (at power)(14.'1.2)Unusual Event 14 3.RCCA Misalignment (14.1.3)or (14.1.4)Unu'sual Event 4.CVCS Malfunction (14.1.5')Unusual Event 5.Loss of Reactor Coolant Flow (14.1.6)Unusual Event 17 6.Inactive Loop Startup (14.1.7)7.Loss of Load (14.1.8)8.Loss of,-Normal Feedwater (14.1.9)*Not classified as an Emergency Condition 12.3-74 Revision 0 March 1, 1981 FSAR Event Descri tion 9.Feedwater System Malfunction (14.1.10)10.Excessive Load Xncrease (14.1.11)11.Loss of All AC Power to Station (14.1.12)12.Turbine Generator Accident (14.1.12)13.Fuel Handling Accident (14.2.1)14.Accidental Licpxid Release (14.2.2)15.Accidental Gaseous Relesae (14.2.3)16.S.G.Tube Rupture (14.2.4)17.Steam Line Break (14.2.5)18.Control Rod Ejection (14.2.6)19.Secondary Side Release (14.2.7)20.LOCA (14.3)Emergency Classification Unusual Event Unusual Event Unusual Event.Unusual Event Alert Alert Alert Alert Unusual Event Alert Unusual Event Alert Alert Example No.18 10 13 13 18, 1, 21 3 1 NOTE: Majority of these examples could be classified more or less severely depending on actual conditions present at the time.12.3-75 Revision 0 March 1, 1981 Pages 12.3-76 through 12.3-91 have been left blank intentionally.
: 12. 3-93
ATTACHMENT 3 TO AEP:NRC'0308F INSERT TO APPENDIX A
: 12. 3-94
~INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Ident>scat>on Number PMP 2080 EPP.001 Title Emergency Plan Activation and Condition Classification evssson No And Date Revision 0 4-1-81 Comments EPP.002 Unusual Evept EP P.003 Al crt.EPP.004 Site Emergency EPP.005 General Emergency Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.006 Initial Dose Assessments and" Revision 0 Veri f ication (Gaseous)-~4-1-81 EPP.007 Initial Release Assessments and Verification (Liquid)Revision 0.4-1-81 EPP.008 Calling Of f-Duty Plant Personnel EPP.009 Fire Emergency Guidelines EPP.010 Chl orine Gas Release Gu idel ines EPP.Oll Natural Emergency Guidelines EPP.012 Initial Of f-Site No tif ications EPP.013 Duties of the Individual Who Discovers an Emergency Condition Revision 0 4-1-81.Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Page 1.Rev.Date 4-1-81 INDIAN'A 5 MICHIGAN POHER COMPANY DONALD C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index ent1 1 cation Number Title evasion No.And Date Comments PMP 2081 EPP.001 Emergency Communications EPP.002 Barring of the PBX Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.003 Follow-Up Off-Site Comnunications Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.004 Protective Action Guides Revision 0 (PAGs)and Protective Actions 4-1-81 EPP.005 Personnel Accountability and Revision 0 Site Evacuation 4-1-81 EPP.006 Activation of the Reentry and Rescue Team Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.007 Security Actions During Emergency Conditions Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.008 Emergency Medical Plan Guidelines EPP.009 Health Physics Procedures EPP.010 Activation of Radiation Monitoring Teams EPP.011 On-Site Radiological Monitoring EPP.012 Of f-Site Radiological Monitoring EPP.013 Environmental Monitoring and Analysis Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Page 2 Rev.Date 4-1-81 INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Ident>>cation Number Title.ev>sson No.And Date Comments PHP 2081 EPP.014 Off-Site Dose Assessments Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.015 Sampling and Analysis of Waterborne Releases EPP.016 Collection and Analysis of Liquid and Gaseous Samples EPP.017 Interpretation of Liquid and Gaseous Samples EPP.018 Transportation Accidents Involving Radioactive Material EPP.019 AEP Emergency Response Organization Activation and Management Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0.4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.020 Activation and Operation of Revision 0.the Technical Support Center 4-1-81 (TSC)EPP.021 Activation and Operation of the Operations Staging Area (OSA)Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.022 EPP.023 Activation and Operation of the Recovery Center (RC)(An Emergency Operations Facility)Activation and Operation of the Emergency Control Center (ECC)(An Emergency Operations Facility)Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.024 Activation and Operation of'evision 0 the Joint Public Information 4-1-81 Center (JPIC)(An Emergency Operations Facility)Page 3 Rev.Date 4-1-81
: 12. 3-95
~~Iki&JANA 5 tlICHIGAN POHF.R COMPANY~HALD C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT flANAGER PROCEDURE Index , Identification Number Title Revision No.And Date Comments PblP 2081 EPP.025 Activation and Operation of the Emergency Hews (ENS)(An Emergency Source Operations Facility)EPP.026 Personnel Assignment to Off-Site Centers EPP.027 Off-Site Support and Assistance
: 12. 3. 6. 2 Levels of Implementation for Alerting, Notifying and Mobilizing
'PP.028 Damage Control, Repair and Recovery Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Page 4 Rev.Date 4-1-81
 
~, e'&.<<~I"I ANA 5 MICilIGAN PO>lER COMPANY DONALD C.COOK NUCLFAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Identif ication.Number Title Revision No.And Date Comments PMP 2082 EPP.001 Emergency Exposure Guidelines Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.002 Public Information Dissemination EPP.003 Maintenance of Emergency Records EPP.004 Emergency Per sonne 1 As s ignments Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.005 Tests, Drills and Exercises Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.006 Training Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.007 Emergency Equipment and Supplies EPP.008 Maps and Forms Revision 0 4-1-81 Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.009 Maintenance of the Emergency Revision 0 Plan Procedures 4-1-81 EPP Appendix A Telephone and Call Numbers Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP Appendix 8 Memorial Hospital Plan Revision 0 4-1-81 Page 5 Rev.Date 4-1-81
===Response===
'APPENDIX B The AEP Emergency Response Organization Procedures will be incorporated into a single document entitled the AEP Emergency Response Manual.This manual will contain subsections which provide the procedures outlining the job functions and responsibilities of each AEP-ERO manager designated on the organization chart Figure 12.3-4 as well as identification of the specific individuals who fill position in the AEP-ERO by title.,}}
Personnel
: 12. 3-97 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
12.3.5.5 Initiatin Conditions 12.3.5.5.1 Unusual Event Initiatin Criteria 1.
ECCS initiated 2.
Radiological effluent technical specification limits exceeded 3.
Fuel damage indication.
Examples:
a.
High coolant activity sample (e.g.,
exceed-ing coolant technical specifications for iodine spike) b.
Failed fuel monitor (PWR) indicates increase greater than 0.1% equivalent fuel failures within 30 minutes.
4.
'Abnormal coolant temperature and/or pressure or abnormal fuel temperatures 5.
Exceeding either primary/secondary leak rate technical specification or primary system leak rate technical specification.
C 6.
Failure of a safety or relief valve to close 7.
Loss of offsite power or loss of onsite AC power capability 8.
Loss of containment integrity requiring shut-down by technical specifications 9.
Loss of engineered safety feature or fire protection system function requiring shutdown by technical specifications (e.g.,
because of 12.3-63 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
malfunction, personnel error or procedural inadequacy) 10.
Fire lasting more than 10 minutes 11.
Indications or alarms on process or effluent parameters not functional in control room to an extent requiring plant shutdown or other significant loss of assessment or communication capability (e.g., plant computer, all meteoro-logical instrumentation) 12.
Security threat or attempted entry or attempted sabotage 13.
Uncontrolled rod 'withdrawal from a subcritical condition 14.
.Uncontrolled rod withdrawal at power 15.
Dropped RCCA assembly.: or bank 16.
Uncontrolled dilution 17.
Loss of one or more reactor coolant pumps above 50% power 18.
Excessive Tavg-Tref Deviation 19.
Natural phenomenon M.ing experienced or projected beyond usual levels a.
Any earthquake b.
50 year flood or low water, t'sunami, hurricane
: surge, seiche c.,
Any tornado near site d.
Any hurricane
: 12. 3-64 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
. 0 20.
Other hazards being experienced or projected a.
Aircraft crash on-site or unusual aircraft activity over facility b.
Train derailment on-site c.
Near or on-site explosion d.
Near or on-site toxic or flammable gas release e.
Turbine failure 21.
Other plant conditions exist that warrant increased awareness on the part, of State and/or local offsite authorities or require plant shut-down under technical specification requirements or involve other than normal controlled shutdown (e.g.,
cooldown rate exceeding technical specifi-cation limits, pipe cracking found during oper-ation) 22.
Transportation of contaminated injured individual from site to offsite hospital 23.
Rapid depressurization of PWR secondary side.
12.3.5.5.2 Alert Initiatin Criteria 1.
Loss of one fission product barrier
- a.
~ 300 ~Ci/cc I-131 coolant sample b.
~50 gpm Primary Coolant Leak Rate c.
Loss of containment integrity
: 12. 3-65 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
2.
Inoperability of a single complete safety system and which cannot be returned to operable within 15 minutes a.
ECCS subsystems b.
Containment Spray c.
Diesels d.
Control Room Evacuation e.
Batteries 3.
O 2 mR/hr at Site Boundary under actual conditions 4.
Other hazards, occurrences, or natural phenomena experienced on-site warranting activation of off-site response forces 12.3.5.5.3 Site Emer enc Initiatin Criteria 1.
Loss of or potential loss of two fission prod~et barriers
. a. ~ 300 ~Ci/cc coolant sample (I-131)
: b. ~ 50 gpm primary coolant. leak c.
Loss of containment integrity 2.
Loss of one fission product barrier as above combined with inoperability of a single complete safety system when needed, or which cannot be restored operable within 1S minutes a.
ECCS subsystem b.
Containment Spray c.
Diesels
: 12. 3-66 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
I
(
 
d.
Control Room Evacuated e.
Batteries OR inoperability of two complete safety systems when needed
: 3. ~ 50 mR/hr whole body at site boundary under existing conditions
~250 mR/hr thyroid at site boundary under existing conditions 4.
Natural phenomena experienced beyond design basis levels.
Other hazards:
Winds, tornado, Earthquake 5.
Other conditions occurring on-site warranting notification of the public to take precautionary measures or prepare to take such measures.
12.3.5.5.4 General Emer enc Xnitiatinq Criteria 1.
Loss of or potential loss of' fission product.
barriers a.
~300 aCi/cc I-131 coolant sample
: b. ~50 gpm primary leak rate c.
Loss of containment integrity 2.
Loss of two fission product barriers combined with inoperability of single complete safety
: system, when needed or which cannot be restored to operable within 15 minutes a.
ECCS subsystem b.
Containment Spray
: 12. 3-67 Revision 0
March.l, 1981
 
c.
Diesel s d.
Control Room Evacuated e.
Batteries 3.
N1 R/hr whole body at site boundary under existing conditions
~5 R/hr thyroid at site boundary under existing conditions 4.
Other plant conditions exist that make release of large amounts of radioactivity in a short time possible.
: 12. 3.5. 6 Exam le Events 12.3.5.6.1 Exam le Alert Initiatin Events 1.
Severe loss of fuel cladding a.
Very high coolan'ctivity sample (e.g.,
300wCi/cc equivalent of I-131) b.
Failed fuel monitor.
(PWR) indicates increase greater than 1% fuel failures within 30 minutes or 5% total fuel failures 2.
Rapid gross failure of one or more steam generator tubes with or without 3,oss of offsite power 3.
Steam line break with significant (e.g.,
greater than 10 gpm) primary to secondary leak rate or with MS'XV malfunction 4.
Primary coolant leak rate greater than 50 gpm
: 12. 3-68 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
I
 
~
~
5.
High radiation levels or high airborne con-tamination which indicate a severe degradation in the control of radioactive materials (e.g.,
increase of factor of 1000 in direct radiation readings) 6.
Loss of offsite power and loss of all onsite AC power 7.
Loss of all onsite DC power 8.
Coolant pump seizure leading to fuel failure 9.
Loss of functions needed for plant cold shutdown 10.
Fuel damage accident with release of radio-activity to containment or fuel handling building 11.
Fire potentially affecting safety systems 12.
All alarms (annunciators) lost 13.
Radiological effluents'greater than 10 times technical specification instantaneous limits (an instantaneous rate which, if continued over 2 hours, would result in about 1
mR at the site boundary under average meteorological conditions) 14.
Ongoing security compromise 15.
Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected a.
Earthquake greater than OBE levels b.
: Flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane
: surge, seiche near design levels 12.3-69 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
I
 
c.
Any tornado striking facility d.
Hurricane winds near design basis level 16.
Other hazards being experienced or projected a.
Aircraft crash on facility b.
Missile impacts from whatever source on facility c.
Known explosion damage to facility affect-ing plant operation d.
Entry into facility environs of toxic or flammable gases e.
Turbine failure causing casing penetration 17.
Other plant conditions exist that warrant.
precautionary activation of technical support center and near-site emergency operations center 18.
Evacuation of control room anticipated or required with control of shutdown systems established from local stations 12.3.5.6.2 Exam le Site Emer enc Initiatin Events 1.
Degraded core with possible loss of eoolable
.geometry (indicators should include instru-mentation to detect inadequate core cooling, coolant activity and/or containment radio-activity levels) 2.
Rapid failure of more than 10 steam generator tubes with loss of offsite power
: 12. 3-70 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
3.
PWR steam line break with greater than 50 gpm primary to secondary leakage and significant indication of fuel damage 4.
Loss of offsite power and loss of onsite AC power for more than 15 minutes 5.
Loss of all vital onsite DC power for more than 15 minutes 6.
Loss of functions needed for plant hot shut-down 7.
Fire affecting safety systems 8.
All alarms (annunciators) lost for'ore than 15 minutes and plant is not in cold shutdown or plant transient initiated while all alarms lost 9.
a.
Effluent monitors detect levels correspond-ing to greater than 50 mR/hr for 4 hour or greater than 500 mR/hr W.B. for two minutes (or five times these. levels to the thyroid) at 'the site boundary for existing meteorology b.
These dose rates're projected based on other plant parameters (e.g., radiation level in containment. with leak rate appro-priate for existing containment pressure) or are measured in the environs 10.
Imminent loss of physical control of the plant
: 12. 3-71 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
11.
Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown a.
Earthquake greater than SSE levels b.
: Flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane
: surge, seiche greater than design levels or failure of protection of vital equipment at lower levels c.
Winds in excess of design levels 12.
Other hazards being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown a.
Aircraft crash affecting vital structures by impact or fire b.
Severe damage to safe shutdown equipment from missiles or explosion c.
Entry of toxic or flammable gases vital areas 13.
Other plant conditions exist that warrant activation of emergency centers and monitor-ing teams and a precautionary public notifi-cation 14.
Evacuation of control room and control of shutdown systems not established from local stations in 15 minutes 12.3.5.6.3 Exam le General Emer enc Initiatin Events 1.
Small and large LOCA's with failure of ECCS to perform leading to severe core degradation 12.3-72 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
or melt.
Ultimate failure of containment likely for melt sequences.
(Several hours available for response) 2.
Transient initiated by loss of feedwater and condensate systems (principal heat removal system) followed by failure of emergency feed-water system for extended period.
Core melting possible in several hours.
Ultimate failure of containment likely if core melts.
3.
Transient requiring operation of shutdown systems with failure to scram.
Core damage for some designs.
Additional failure of core cooling and makeup systems would lead to core melt.
4.
Failure of offsite and onsite power along with total loss of emergency feedwater makeup capability for several hours would lead to eventual core melt and likely failure of con-tainment.
5..
Small LOCA and initially successful ECCS.
Subsequent failure of containment heat removal systems over several hours could lead to core melt and likely failure of containment.
12 ~ 3 73 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
12.3.5.7 Emergency Classification of FSAR Postulated Transients The FSAR postulated transients are classified into emergency event categories as indicated below.
The transients are bounded by the conditions set forth in Chapter 14 of the FSAR.
Reference to the applic-able FSAR section is indicated by the number in
(
) ~
FSAR Event Descri tion Emergency Classification Example No.
1.
Uncontrolled Rod Withdrawal (subcritical)
(14.1.1).
Unusual Event 13 2.
Uncontrolled Rod Withdrawal (at power)
(14.'1.2)
Unusual Event 14 3.
RCCA Misalignment (14.1. 3) or (14.1. 4)
Unu'sual Event 4.
CVCS Malfunction (14.1.5')
Unusual Event 5.
Loss of Reactor Coolant Flow (14.1.6)
Unusual Event 17 6.
Inactive Loop Startup (14.1.7) 7.
Loss of Load (14.1.8) 8.
Loss of,-Normal Feedwater (14.1.9)
*Not classified as an Emergency Condition 12.3-74 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
FSAR Event Descri tion 9.
Feedwater System Malfunction (14.1.10) 10.
Excessive Load Xncrease (14.1.11) 11.
Loss of All AC Power to Station (14.1.12) 12.
Turbine Generator Accident (14.1.12) 13.
Fuel Handling Accident (14.2.1) 14.
Accidental Licpxid Release (14.2.2) 15.
Accidental Gaseous Relesae (14.2.3) 16.
S.G.
Tube Rupture (14. 2. 4 )
17.
Steam Line Break (14.2.5) 18.
Control Rod Ejection (14. 2. 6) 19.
Secondary Side Release (14.2.7) 20.
LOCA (14. 3)
Emergency Classification Unusual Event Unusual Event Unusual Event.
Unusual Event Alert Alert Alert Alert Unusual Event Alert Unusual Event Alert Alert Example No.
18 10 13 13 18, 1, 21 3
1 NOTE:
Majority of these examples could be classified more or less severely depending on actual conditions present at the time.
12.3-75 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
Pages 12.3-76 through 12.3-91 have been left blank intentionally.
 
ATTACHMENT 3 TO AEP:NRC'0308F
 
INSERT TO APPENDIX A
 
~ INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C.
COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Ident>
scat>on Number PMP 2080 EPP.001 Title Emergency Plan Activation and Condition Classification evssson No And Date Revision 0
4-1-81 Comments EPP.002 Unusual Evept EP P.003 Alcrt
. EPP.004 Site Emergency EPP.005 General Emergency Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.006 Initial Dose Assessments and
" Revision 0
Verification (Gaseous)
~ 4-1-81 EPP.007 Initial Release Assessments and Verification (Liquid)
Revision 0
. 4-1-81 EPP.008 Calling Off-Duty Plant Personnel EPP.009 Fire Emergency Guidelines EPP.010 Chl orine Gas Release Gu idel ines EPP.Oll Natural Emergency Guidelines EPP.012 Initial Off-Site Notifications EPP.013 Duties of the Individual Who Discovers an Emergency Condition Revision 0
4-1-81
. Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Page 1
Rev.
Date 4-1-81
 
INDIAN'A 5 MICHIGAN POHER COMPANY DONALD C.
COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index ent1 1 cation Number Title evasion No.
And Date Comments PMP 2081 EPP.001 Emergency Communications EPP.002 Barring of the PBX Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.003 Follow-Up Off-Site Comnunications Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.004 Protective Action Guides Revision 0
(PAGs) and Protective Actions 4-1-81 EPP.005 Personnel Accountability and Revision 0
Site Evacuation 4-1-81 EPP.006 Activation of the Reentry and Rescue Team Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.007 Security Actions During Emergency Conditions Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.008 Emergency Medical Plan Guidelines EPP.009 Health Physics Procedures EPP.010 Activation of Radiation Monitoring Teams EPP.011 On-Site Radiological Monitoring EPP.012 Off-Site Radiological Monitoring EPP.013 Environmental Monitoring and Analysis Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Page 2
Rev.
Date 4-1-81
 
INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C.
COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Ident> >cation Number Title ev>sson No.
And Date Comments PHP 2081 EPP.014 Off-Site Dose Assessments Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.015 Sampling and Analysis of Waterborne Releases EPP.016 Collection and Analysis of Liquid and Gaseous Samples EPP.017 Interpretation of Liquid and Gaseous Samples EPP.018 Transportation Accidents Involving Radioactive Material EPP.019 AEP Emergency
 
===Response===
Organization Activation and Management Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0.
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.020 Activation and Operation of Revision 0.
the Technical Support Center 4-1-81 (TSC)
EPP.021 Activation and Operation of the Operations Staging Area (OSA)
Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.022 EPP.023 Activation and Operation of the Recovery Center (RC)
(An Emergency Operations Facility)
Activation and Operation of the Emergency Control Center (ECC)
(An Emergency Operations Facility)
Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.024 Activation and Operation of 'evision 0
the Joint Public Information 4-1-81 Center (JPIC)
(An Emergency Operations Facility)
Page 3
Rev.
Date 4-1-81
 
~
~
Iki&JANA 5 tlICHIGAN POHF.R COMPANY
~HALD C.
COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT flANAGER PROCEDURE Index
, Identification Number Title Revision No.
And Date Comments PblP 2081 EPP.025 Activation and Operation of the Emergency Hews (ENS)
(An Emergency Source Operations Facility)
EPP.026 Personnel Assignment to Off-Site Centers EPP.027 Off-Site Support and Assistance
'PP.028 Damage Control, Repair and Recovery Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Page 4
Rev.
Date 4-1-81
 
~,
e'
~
I "I
ANA 5 MICilIGAN PO>lER COMPANY DONALD C.
COOK NUCLFAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Identification.
Number Title Revision No.
And Date Comments PMP 2082 EPP.001 Emergency Exposure Guidelines Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.002 Public Information Dissemination EPP.003 Maintenance of Emergency Records EPP.004 Emergency Per sonne 1
As s ignments Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.005 Tests, Drills and Exercises Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.006 Training Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.007 Emergency Equipment and Supplies EPP.008 Maps and Forms Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.009 Maintenance of the Emergency Revision 0
Plan Procedures 4-1-81 EPP Appendix A
Telephone and Call Numbers Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP Appendix 8
Memorial Hospital Plan Revision 0
4-1-81 Page 5
Rev.
Date 4-1-81
 
'APPENDIX B
The AEP Emergency
 
===Response===
Organization Procedures will be incorporated into a single document entitled the AEP Emergency
 
===Response===
Manual.
This manual will contain subsections which provide the procedures outlining the job functions and responsibilities of each AEP-ERO manager designated on the organization chart Figure 12.3-4 as well as identification of the specific individuals who fill position in the AEP-ERO by title.,}}

Latest revision as of 16:35, 7 January 2025

Forwards Public Version of Addl Info to Be Inserted in 810102 Revised Emergency Plan
ML17319A852
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/1981
From: Hunter R
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17319A851 List:
References
AEP:NRC:00308F, AEP:NRC:308F, NUDOCS 8105140231
Download: ML17319A852 (31)


Text

INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P. 0.

BOX 18 BOWLING.GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N. Y. 10004 March 2, 1981 AEP:NRC:00308F Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos.

1 and 2

Docket Nos.

50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.

OPR-58 and DPR-74 EMERGENCY PLAN INSERTS Mt. Harold R. Oenton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.

C.

20555

Dear Mr. Denton:

The attachments to this letter transmit the additional information committed to by the submittal of our Emergency Plan under AEP:NRC:00308B, dated January 26, 1981.

Since this information is an insert to the original documents we have transmitted to you, we are not treating this as a formal revision or change to the documents you now have.

One control copy and nine additional copies of the inserts are being sent to you.

Three copies of the inserts are also being transmitted to the NRC Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement under separate cover.

Very truly yours, S. Hunter Vice President cc:

John E. Dolan R.

W. Jurgensen R.

C. Callen G. Charnoff D. V. Shaller - Bridgman NRC Region III Resident Inspector - Bridgman NRC Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement yDC5 i/(o PERSONAL PRIVACYINPORIATION DELETED IN ACCORDANCE5ITH THE FREEDOM Or XmZOZ,mTION ACX

ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC;0308F PERSONAL PRIVACY INFORMATION DELETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZBEMOMOF INFORMATIONACT

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd.)

Title Pacae 12.3.4.1 Interagency Radiological Assistance Plan (IRAP)

'12.3.4.2 Off-Site Representatives 12.3.4.3 Off-Site Agencies and Organizations 12.3 '

EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPORT AND RESOURCES

12. 3-48
12. 3-49 12.3-52 12.3-52 12.3.5.3 Emergency Protective Action Guidelines All Classifications Gaseous Release (Four Charts)
12. 3. 5 EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 12.3.5.1 Emergency Action Levels 12.3.5.2 Protective Actions 12.3-54 12.3-55 12.3-56 12.3-58 12.3.5.4 Emergency Protective Action Guidelines All Clc.ssifications-Liquid Releases
12. 3-62 12.3.5.5 Initiating Conditions 12.3.5.6 Example Events 12.3.5.7 Emergency Classification of FSAR Postulated Transients 12.3-63 12.3-68
12. 3-74 12.3.6.1 Notification of Emergency

Response

Personnel and Organizations 12.3.6.1.1 On-Site 12.3.6.1.2 Off-Site (Plant Staff) 12.3.6.1.3 Off-Site Response Organizations 12.3.6 NOTIFICATION METHODS AND PROCEDURES 12.3-92 12.3-93

12. 3-93
12. 3-94
12. 3-95
12. 3. 6. 2 Levels of Implementation for Alerting, Notifying and Mobilizing

Response

Personnel

12. 3-97 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

12.3.5.5 Initiatin Conditions 12.3.5.5.1 Unusual Event Initiatin Criteria 1.

ECCS initiated 2.

Radiological effluent technical specification limits exceeded 3.

Fuel damage indication.

Examples:

a.

High coolant activity sample (e.g.,

exceed-ing coolant technical specifications for iodine spike) b.

Failed fuel monitor (PWR) indicates increase greater than 0.1% equivalent fuel failures within 30 minutes.

4.

'Abnormal coolant temperature and/or pressure or abnormal fuel temperatures 5.

Exceeding either primary/secondary leak rate technical specification or primary system leak rate technical specification.

C 6.

Failure of a safety or relief valve to close 7.

Loss of offsite power or loss of onsite AC power capability 8.

Loss of containment integrity requiring shut-down by technical specifications 9.

Loss of engineered safety feature or fire protection system function requiring shutdown by technical specifications (e.g.,

because of 12.3-63 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

malfunction, personnel error or procedural inadequacy) 10.

Fire lasting more than 10 minutes 11.

Indications or alarms on process or effluent parameters not functional in control room to an extent requiring plant shutdown or other significant loss of assessment or communication capability (e.g., plant computer, all meteoro-logical instrumentation) 12.

Security threat or attempted entry or attempted sabotage 13.

Uncontrolled rod 'withdrawal from a subcritical condition 14.

.Uncontrolled rod withdrawal at power 15.

Dropped RCCA assembly.: or bank 16.

Uncontrolled dilution 17.

Loss of one or more reactor coolant pumps above 50% power 18.

Excessive Tavg-Tref Deviation 19.

Natural phenomenon M.ing experienced or projected beyond usual levels a.

Any earthquake b.

50 year flood or low water, t'sunami, hurricane

surge, seiche c.,

Any tornado near site d.

Any hurricane

12. 3-64 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

. 0 20.

Other hazards being experienced or projected a.

Aircraft crash on-site or unusual aircraft activity over facility b.

Train derailment on-site c.

Near or on-site explosion d.

Near or on-site toxic or flammable gas release e.

Turbine failure 21.

Other plant conditions exist that warrant increased awareness on the part, of State and/or local offsite authorities or require plant shut-down under technical specification requirements or involve other than normal controlled shutdown (e.g.,

cooldown rate exceeding technical specifi-cation limits, pipe cracking found during oper-ation) 22.

Transportation of contaminated injured individual from site to offsite hospital 23.

Rapid depressurization of PWR secondary side.

12.3.5.5.2 Alert Initiatin Criteria 1.

Loss of one fission product barrier

- a.

~ 300 ~Ci/cc I-131 coolant sample b.

~50 gpm Primary Coolant Leak Rate c.

Loss of containment integrity

12. 3-65 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

2.

Inoperability of a single complete safety system and which cannot be returned to operable within 15 minutes a.

ECCS subsystems b.

Containment Spray c.

Diesels d.

Control Room Evacuation e.

Batteries 3.

O 2 mR/hr at Site Boundary under actual conditions 4.

Other hazards, occurrences, or natural phenomena experienced on-site warranting activation of off-site response forces 12.3.5.5.3 Site Emer enc Initiatin Criteria 1.

Loss of or potential loss of two fission prod~et barriers

. a. ~ 300 ~Ci/cc coolant sample (I-131)

b. ~ 50 gpm primary coolant. leak c.

Loss of containment integrity 2.

Loss of one fission product barrier as above combined with inoperability of a single complete safety system when needed, or which cannot be restored operable within 1S minutes a.

ECCS subsystem b.

Containment Spray c.

Diesels

12. 3-66 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

I

(

d.

Control Room Evacuated e.

Batteries OR inoperability of two complete safety systems when needed

3. ~ 50 mR/hr whole body at site boundary under existing conditions

~250 mR/hr thyroid at site boundary under existing conditions 4.

Natural phenomena experienced beyond design basis levels.

Other hazards:

Winds, tornado, Earthquake 5.

Other conditions occurring on-site warranting notification of the public to take precautionary measures or prepare to take such measures.

12.3.5.5.4 General Emer enc Xnitiatinq Criteria 1.

Loss of or potential loss of' fission product.

barriers a.

~300 aCi/cc I-131 coolant sample

b. ~50 gpm primary leak rate c.

Loss of containment integrity 2.

Loss of two fission product barriers combined with inoperability of single complete safety

system, when needed or which cannot be restored to operable within 15 minutes a.

ECCS subsystem b.

Containment Spray

12. 3-67 Revision 0

March.l, 1981

c.

Diesel s d.

Control Room Evacuated e.

Batteries 3.

N1 R/hr whole body at site boundary under existing conditions

~5 R/hr thyroid at site boundary under existing conditions 4.

Other plant conditions exist that make release of large amounts of radioactivity in a short time possible.

12. 3.5. 6 Exam le Events 12.3.5.6.1 Exam le Alert Initiatin Events 1.

Severe loss of fuel cladding a.

Very high coolan'ctivity sample (e.g.,

300wCi/cc equivalent of I-131) b.

Failed fuel monitor.

(PWR) indicates increase greater than 1% fuel failures within 30 minutes or 5% total fuel failures 2.

Rapid gross failure of one or more steam generator tubes with or without 3,oss of offsite power 3.

Steam line break with significant (e.g.,

greater than 10 gpm) primary to secondary leak rate or with MS'XV malfunction 4.

Primary coolant leak rate greater than 50 gpm

12. 3-68 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

I

~

~

5.

High radiation levels or high airborne con-tamination which indicate a severe degradation in the control of radioactive materials (e.g.,

increase of factor of 1000 in direct radiation readings) 6.

Loss of offsite power and loss of all onsite AC power 7.

Loss of all onsite DC power 8.

Coolant pump seizure leading to fuel failure 9.

Loss of functions needed for plant cold shutdown 10.

Fuel damage accident with release of radio-activity to containment or fuel handling building 11.

Fire potentially affecting safety systems 12.

All alarms (annunciators) lost 13.

Radiological effluents'greater than 10 times technical specification instantaneous limits (an instantaneous rate which, if continued over 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, would result in about 1

mR at the site boundary under average meteorological conditions) 14.

Ongoing security compromise 15.

Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected a.

Earthquake greater than OBE levels b.

Flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane
surge, seiche near design levels 12.3-69 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

I

c.

Any tornado striking facility d.

Hurricane winds near design basis level 16.

Other hazards being experienced or projected a.

Aircraft crash on facility b.

Missile impacts from whatever source on facility c.

Known explosion damage to facility affect-ing plant operation d.

Entry into facility environs of toxic or flammable gases e.

Turbine failure causing casing penetration 17.

Other plant conditions exist that warrant.

precautionary activation of technical support center and near-site emergency operations center 18.

Evacuation of control room anticipated or required with control of shutdown systems established from local stations 12.3.5.6.2 Exam le Site Emer enc Initiatin Events 1.

Degraded core with possible loss of eoolable

.geometry (indicators should include instru-mentation to detect inadequate core cooling, coolant activity and/or containment radio-activity levels) 2.

Rapid failure of more than 10 steam generator tubes with loss of offsite power

12. 3-70 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

3.

PWR steam line break with greater than 50 gpm primary to secondary leakage and significant indication of fuel damage 4.

Loss of offsite power and loss of onsite AC power for more than 15 minutes 5.

Loss of all vital onsite DC power for more than 15 minutes 6.

Loss of functions needed for plant hot shut-down 7.

Fire affecting safety systems 8.

All alarms (annunciators) lost for'ore than 15 minutes and plant is not in cold shutdown or plant transient initiated while all alarms lost 9.

a.

Effluent monitors detect levels correspond-ing to greater than 50 mR/hr for 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> or greater than 500 mR/hr W.B. for two minutes (or five times these. levels to the thyroid) at 'the site boundary for existing meteorology b.

These dose rates're projected based on other plant parameters (e.g., radiation level in containment. with leak rate appro-priate for existing containment pressure) or are measured in the environs 10.

Imminent loss of physical control of the plant

12. 3-71 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

11.

Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown a.

Earthquake greater than SSE levels b.

Flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane
surge, seiche greater than design levels or failure of protection of vital equipment at lower levels c.

Winds in excess of design levels 12.

Other hazards being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown a.

Aircraft crash affecting vital structures by impact or fire b.

Severe damage to safe shutdown equipment from missiles or explosion c.

Entry of toxic or flammable gases vital areas 13.

Other plant conditions exist that warrant activation of emergency centers and monitor-ing teams and a precautionary public notifi-cation 14.

Evacuation of control room and control of shutdown systems not established from local stations in 15 minutes 12.3.5.6.3 Exam le General Emer enc Initiatin Events 1.

Small and large LOCA's with failure of ECCS to perform leading to severe core degradation 12.3-72 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

or melt.

Ultimate failure of containment likely for melt sequences.

(Several hours available for response) 2.

Transient initiated by loss of feedwater and condensate systems (principal heat removal system) followed by failure of emergency feed-water system for extended period.

Core melting possible in several hours.

Ultimate failure of containment likely if core melts.

3.

Transient requiring operation of shutdown systems with failure to scram.

Core damage for some designs.

Additional failure of core cooling and makeup systems would lead to core melt.

4.

Failure of offsite and onsite power along with total loss of emergency feedwater makeup capability for several hours would lead to eventual core melt and likely failure of con-tainment.

5..

Small LOCA and initially successful ECCS.

Subsequent failure of containment heat removal systems over several hours could lead to core melt and likely failure of containment.

12 ~ 3 73 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

12.3.5.7 Emergency Classification of FSAR Postulated Transients The FSAR postulated transients are classified into emergency event categories as indicated below.

The transients are bounded by the conditions set forth in Chapter 14 of the FSAR.

Reference to the applic-able FSAR section is indicated by the number in

(

) ~

FSAR Event Descri tion Emergency Classification Example No.

1.

Uncontrolled Rod Withdrawal (subcritical)

(14.1.1).

Unusual Event 13 2.

Uncontrolled Rod Withdrawal (at power)

(14.'1.2)

Unusual Event 14 3.

RCCA Misalignment (14.1. 3) or (14.1. 4)

Unu'sual Event 4.

CVCS Malfunction (14.1.5')

Unusual Event 5.

Loss of Reactor Coolant Flow (14.1.6)

Unusual Event 17 6.

Inactive Loop Startup (14.1.7) 7.

Loss of Load (14.1.8) 8.

Loss of,-Normal Feedwater (14.1.9)

  • Not classified as an Emergency Condition 12.3-74 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

FSAR Event Descri tion 9.

Feedwater System Malfunction (14.1.10) 10.

Excessive Load Xncrease (14.1.11) 11.

Loss of All AC Power to Station (14.1.12) 12.

Turbine Generator Accident (14.1.12) 13.

Fuel Handling Accident (14.2.1) 14.

Accidental Licpxid Release (14.2.2) 15.

Accidental Gaseous Relesae (14.2.3) 16.

S.G.

Tube Rupture (14. 2. 4 )

17.

Steam Line Break (14.2.5) 18.

Control Rod Ejection (14. 2. 6) 19.

Secondary Side Release (14.2.7) 20.

LOCA (14. 3)

Emergency Classification Unusual Event Unusual Event Unusual Event.

Unusual Event Alert Alert Alert Alert Unusual Event Alert Unusual Event Alert Alert Example No.

18 10 13 13 18, 1, 21 3

1 NOTE:

Majority of these examples could be classified more or less severely depending on actual conditions present at the time.

12.3-75 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

Pages 12.3-76 through 12.3-91 have been left blank intentionally.

ATTACHMENT 3 TO AEP:NRC'0308F

INSERT TO APPENDIX A

~ INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C.

COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Ident>

scat>on Number PMP 2080 EPP.001 Title Emergency Plan Activation and Condition Classification evssson No And Date Revision 0

4-1-81 Comments EPP.002 Unusual Evept EP P.003 Alcrt

. EPP.004 Site Emergency EPP.005 General Emergency Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.006 Initial Dose Assessments and

" Revision 0

Verification (Gaseous)

~ 4-1-81 EPP.007 Initial Release Assessments and Verification (Liquid)

Revision 0

. 4-1-81 EPP.008 Calling Off-Duty Plant Personnel EPP.009 Fire Emergency Guidelines EPP.010 Chl orine Gas Release Gu idel ines EPP.Oll Natural Emergency Guidelines EPP.012 Initial Off-Site Notifications EPP.013 Duties of the Individual Who Discovers an Emergency Condition Revision 0

4-1-81

. Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Page 1

Rev.

Date 4-1-81

INDIAN'A 5 MICHIGAN POHER COMPANY DONALD C.

COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index ent1 1 cation Number Title evasion No.

And Date Comments PMP 2081 EPP.001 Emergency Communications EPP.002 Barring of the PBX Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.003 Follow-Up Off-Site Comnunications Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.004 Protective Action Guides Revision 0

(PAGs) and Protective Actions 4-1-81 EPP.005 Personnel Accountability and Revision 0

Site Evacuation 4-1-81 EPP.006 Activation of the Reentry and Rescue Team Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.007 Security Actions During Emergency Conditions Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.008 Emergency Medical Plan Guidelines EPP.009 Health Physics Procedures EPP.010 Activation of Radiation Monitoring Teams EPP.011 On-Site Radiological Monitoring EPP.012 Off-Site Radiological Monitoring EPP.013 Environmental Monitoring and Analysis Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Page 2

Rev.

Date 4-1-81

INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C.

COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Ident> >cation Number Title ev>sson No.

And Date Comments PHP 2081 EPP.014 Off-Site Dose Assessments Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.015 Sampling and Analysis of Waterborne Releases EPP.016 Collection and Analysis of Liquid and Gaseous Samples EPP.017 Interpretation of Liquid and Gaseous Samples EPP.018 Transportation Accidents Involving Radioactive Material EPP.019 AEP Emergency

Response

Organization Activation and Management Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0.

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.020 Activation and Operation of Revision 0.

the Technical Support Center 4-1-81 (TSC)

EPP.021 Activation and Operation of the Operations Staging Area (OSA)

Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.022 EPP.023 Activation and Operation of the Recovery Center (RC)

(An Emergency Operations Facility)

Activation and Operation of the Emergency Control Center (ECC)

(An Emergency Operations Facility)

Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.024 Activation and Operation of 'evision 0

the Joint Public Information 4-1-81 Center (JPIC)

(An Emergency Operations Facility)

Page 3

Rev.

Date 4-1-81

~

~

Iki&JANA 5 tlICHIGAN POHF.R COMPANY

~HALD C.

COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT flANAGER PROCEDURE Index

, Identification Number Title Revision No.

And Date Comments PblP 2081 EPP.025 Activation and Operation of the Emergency Hews (ENS)

(An Emergency Source Operations Facility)

EPP.026 Personnel Assignment to Off-Site Centers EPP.027 Off-Site Support and Assistance

'PP.028 Damage Control, Repair and Recovery Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Page 4

Rev.

Date 4-1-81

~,

e'

~

I "I

ANA 5 MICilIGAN PO>lER COMPANY DONALD C.

COOK NUCLFAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Identification.

Number Title Revision No.

And Date Comments PMP 2082 EPP.001 Emergency Exposure Guidelines Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.002 Public Information Dissemination EPP.003 Maintenance of Emergency Records EPP.004 Emergency Per sonne 1

As s ignments Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.005 Tests, Drills and Exercises Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.006 Training Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.007 Emergency Equipment and Supplies EPP.008 Maps and Forms Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.009 Maintenance of the Emergency Revision 0

Plan Procedures 4-1-81 EPP Appendix A

Telephone and Call Numbers Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP Appendix 8

Memorial Hospital Plan Revision 0

4-1-81 Page 5

Rev.

Date 4-1-81

'APPENDIX B

The AEP Emergency

Response

Organization Procedures will be incorporated into a single document entitled the AEP Emergency

Response

Manual.

This manual will contain subsections which provide the procedures outlining the job functions and responsibilities of each AEP-ERO manager designated on the organization chart Figure 12.3-4 as well as identification of the specific individuals who fill position in the AEP-ERO by title.,