ML17319A852: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P. 0. BOX 18 BOWLING .GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N. Y. 10004 March 2, 1981 AEP:NRC:00308F Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos.     1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. OPR-58 and DPR-74 EMERGENCY PLAN INSERTS Mt . Harold R. Oenton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
{{#Wiki_filter:INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P. 0.
BOX 18 BOWLING.GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N. Y. 10004 March 2, 1981 AEP:NRC:00308F Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos.
1 and 2
Docket Nos.
50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.
OPR-58 and DPR-74 EMERGENCY PLAN INSERTS Mt. Harold R. Oenton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555


==Dear Mr. Denton:==
==Dear Mr. Denton:==
The attachments to this letter transmit the additional information committed to by the submittal of our Emergency Plan under AEP:NRC:00308B, dated January 26, 1981.
Since this information is an insert to the original documents we have transmitted to you, we are not treating this as a formal revision or change to the documents you now have.
One control copy and nine additional copies of the inserts are being sent to you.
Three copies of the inserts are also being transmitted to the NRC Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement under separate cover.
Very truly yours, S. Hunter Vice President cc:
John E. Dolan R.
W. Jurgensen R.
C. Callen G. Charnoff D. V. Shaller - Bridgman NRC Region III Resident Inspector - Bridgman NRC Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement yDC5 i/(o PERSONAL PRIVACYINPORIATION DELETED IN ACCORDANCE5ITH THE FREEDOM Or XmZOZ,mTION ACX


The attachments  to this letter transmit    the additional information committed to by the submittal of our Emergency Plan under AEP:NRC:00308B, dated January 26, 1981. Since this information is an insert to the original documents we have transmitted to you, we are not treating this as a formal revision or change to the documents you now have. One control copy and nine additional copies of the inserts are being sent to you. Three copies of the inserts are also being transmitted to the NRC Region        III Office of Inspection  and  Enforcement  under  separate  cover.
ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC;0308F PERSONAL PRIVACY INFORMATION DELETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZBEMOMOF INFORMATIONACT
Very truly yours,
                                                    . S. Hunter Vice President cc:  John E. Dolan R. W. Jurgensen R. C. Callen G. Charnoff                                                            yDC5 D. V. Shaller - Bridgman NRC Region  III Resident Inspector -    Bridgman NRC Region  III Office of Inspection    and Enforcement i/(o INPORIATION PERSONAL PRIVACY 5ITH THE DELETED IN ACCORDANCE ACX FREEDOM Or XmZOZ,mTION


ATTACHMENT  1 TO AEP:NRC;0308F PERSONAL PRIVACY INFORMATION DELETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZBEMOM OF INFORMATIONACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd.)
Title Pacae 12.3.4.1 Interagency Radiological Assistance Plan (IRAP)
'12.3.4.2 Off-Site Representatives 12.3.4.3 Off-Site Agencies and Organizations 12.3 '
EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPORT AND RESOURCES
: 12. 3-48
: 12. 3-49 12.3-52 12.3-52 12.3.5.3 Emergency Protective Action Guidelines All Classifications Gaseous Release (Four Charts)
: 12. 3. 5 EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 12.3.5.1 Emergency Action Levels 12.3.5.2 Protective Actions 12.3-54 12.3-55 12.3-56 12.3-58 12.3.5.4 Emergency Protective Action Guidelines All Clc.ssifications-Liquid Releases
: 12. 3-62 12.3.5.5 Initiating Conditions 12.3.5.6 Example Events 12.3.5.7 Emergency Classification of FSAR Postulated Transients 12.3-63 12.3-68
: 12. 3-74 12.3.6.1 Notification of Emergency


TABLE OF CONTENTS  (cont'd.)
===Response===
Title                                        Pacae 12.3 '    EMERGENCY RESPONSE    SUPPORT  AND RESOURCES              12. 3-48 12.3.4.1   Interagency Radiological Assistance            12. 3-49 Plan (IRAP)
Personnel and Organizations 12.3.6.1.1 On-Site 12.3.6.1.2 Off-Site (Plant Staff) 12.3.6.1.3 Off-Site Response Organizations 12.3.6 NOTIFICATION METHODS AND PROCEDURES 12.3-92 12.3-93
        '12.3.4.2    Off-Site Representatives                      12.3-52 12.3.4.3    Off-Site Agencies and Organizations            12.3-52
: 12. 3-93
: 12. 3. 5  EMERGENCY  CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM                          12.3-54 12.3.5.1    Emergency  Action Levels                      12.3-55 12.3.5.2    Protective Actions                            12.3-56 12.3.5.3    Emergency Protective Action                    12.3-58 Guidelines  All Classifications Gaseous Release (Four Charts) 12.3.5.4    Emergency Protective Action                    12. 3-62 Guidelines  All Clc.ssifications-Liquid Releases 12.3.5.5    Initiating Conditions                          12.3-63 12.3.5.6   Example Events                                12.3-68 12.3.5.7    Emergency  Classification of  FSAR            12. 3-74 Postulated Transients 12.3.6   NOTIFICATION METHODS AND PROCEDURES                       12.3-92 12.3.6.1    Notification of  Emergency Response          12.3-93 Personnel  and  Organizations 12.3.6.1.1  On-Site                          12. 3-93 12.3.6.1.2  Off-Site (Plant Staff)            12. 3-94 12.3.6.1.3  Off-Site Response                12. 3-95 Organizations
: 12. 3-94
: 12. 3. 6. 2 Levels of Implementation for                   12. 3-97 Alerting, Notifying   and Mobilizing Response  Personnel Revision 0 March 1, 1981
: 12. 3-95
: 12. 3. 6. 2 Levels of Implementation for Alerting, Notifying and Mobilizing


12.3.5.5  Initiatin  Conditions 12.3.5.5.1 Unusual Event  Initiatin Criteria
===Response===
: 1. ECCS  initiated
Personnel
: 2. Radiological effluent technical specification limits  exceeded
: 12. 3-97 Revision 0
: 3. Fuel damage  indication. Examples:
March 1, 1981
: a. High coolant    activity sample  (e.g., exceed-ing coolant technical specifications for iodine spike)
: b. Failed fuel monitor (PWR) indicates increase greater than 0.1% equivalent fuel failures within  30 minutes.
: 4.  'Abnormal coolant temperature    and/or pressure or abnormal fuel temperatures
: 5. Exceeding  either primary/secondary leak rate technical specification or primary system leak rate technical specification.
C
: 6. Failure of a safety or relief valve to close
: 7. Loss of offsite power or loss of onsite AC power capability
: 8. Loss of containment integrity requiring shut-down by technical specifications
: 9. Loss of engineered safety feature or fire protection system function requiring shutdown by technical specifications (e.g., because of 12.3-63                  Revision 0 March 1, 1981


malfunction, personnel error or procedural inadequacy)
12.3.5.5 Initiatin Conditions 12.3.5.5.1 Unusual Event Initiatin Criteria 1.
: 10. Fire lasting more than 10 minutes
ECCS initiated 2.
: 11. Indications or alarms on process or effluent parameters not functional in control room to an extent requiring plant shutdown or other significant loss of assessment or communication capability (e.g., plant computer, all meteoro-logical instrumentation)
Radiological effluent technical specification limits exceeded 3.
: 12. Security threat or attempted entry or attempted sabotage
Fuel damage indication.
: 13. Uncontrolled rod 'withdrawal from    a  subcritical condition
Examples:
: 14. .Uncontrolled rod withdrawal at power
a.
: 15. Dropped    RCCA  assembly.: or bank
High coolant activity sample (e.g.,
: 16. Uncontrolled dilution
exceed-ing coolant technical specifications for iodine spike) b.
: 17. Loss   of one  or more  reactor coolant  pumps above    50% power
Failed fuel monitor (PWR) indicates increase greater than 0.1% equivalent fuel failures within 30 minutes.
: 18. Excessive Tavg-Tref Deviation
4.
: 19. Natural phenomenon M.ing experienced or projected beyond usual levels
'Abnormal coolant temperature and/or pressure or abnormal fuel temperatures 5.
: a. Any earthquake
Exceeding either primary/secondary leak rate technical specification or primary system leak rate technical specification.
: b. 50  year flood or low water, t'sunami, hurricane surge, seiche c., Any tornado near site
C 6.
: d. Any hurricane
Failure of a safety or relief valve to close 7.
: 12. 3-64                  Revision 0 March 1, 1981
Loss of offsite power or loss of onsite AC power capability 8.
Loss of containment integrity requiring shut-down by technical specifications 9.
Loss of engineered safety feature or fire protection system function requiring shutdown by technical specifications (e.g.,
because of 12.3-63 Revision 0
March 1, 1981


                                            . 0
malfunction, personnel error or procedural inadequacy) 10.
: 20. Other hazards being experienced or projected
Fire lasting more than 10 minutes 11.
: a. Aircraft crash on-site or   unusual aircraft activity over facility
Indications or alarms on process or effluent parameters not functional in control room to an extent requiring plant shutdown or other significant loss of assessment or communication capability (e.g., plant computer, all meteoro-logical instrumentation) 12.
: b. Train derailment on-site
Security threat or attempted entry or attempted sabotage 13.
: c. Near or on-site explosion
Uncontrolled rod 'withdrawal from a subcritical condition 14.
: d. Near or on-site toxic or flammable gas release
.Uncontrolled rod withdrawal at power 15.
: e. Turbine   failure
Dropped RCCA assembly.: or bank 16.
: 21. Other plant conditions   exist that warrant increased awareness on the part, of State and/or local offsite authorities or require plant shut-down under technical specification requirements or involve other than normal controlled shutdown (e.g., cooldown rate exceeding technical specifi-cation limits, pipe cracking found during oper-ation)
Uncontrolled dilution 17.
: 22. Transportation of contaminated injured individual from site to offsite hospital
Loss of one or more reactor coolant pumps above 50% power 18.
: 23. Rapid depressurization of PWR secondary side.
Excessive Tavg-Tref Deviation 19.
12.3.5.5.2 Alert Initiatin Criteria
Natural phenomenon M.ing experienced or projected beyond usual levels a.
: 1. Loss of one fission product barrier
Any earthquake b.
              -
50 year flood or low water, t'sunami, hurricane
: a. ~ 300 ~Ci/cc I-131 coolant sample
: surge, seiche c.,
: b.   ~50 gpm Primary Coolant Leak Rate
Any tornado near site d.
: c. Loss of containment   integrity
Any hurricane
: 12. 3-65                 Revision 0 March 1, 1981
: 12. 3-64 Revision 0
: 2. Inoperability of     a single complete safety system and     which cannot be returned to operable within   15 minutes
March 1, 1981
: a. ECCS   subsystems
 
: b. Containment Spray
. 0 20.
: c. Diesels
Other hazards being experienced or projected a.
: d. Control   Room Evacuation
Aircraft crash on-site or unusual aircraft activity over facility b.
: e. Batteries
Train derailment on-site c.
: 3. O 2 mR/hr at Site Boundary under actual conditions
Near or on-site explosion d.
: 4. Other hazards, occurrences, or natural phenomena experienced on-site warranting activation of off-site   response   forces 12.3.5.5.3 Site Emer enc     Initiatin Criteria
Near or on-site toxic or flammable gas release e.
: 1. Loss of or potential loss of two fission prod~et barriers
Turbine failure 21.
              . a. ~ 300 ~Ci/cc coolant sample (I-131)
Other plant conditions exist that warrant increased awareness on the part, of State and/or local offsite authorities or require plant shut-down under technical specification requirements or involve other than normal controlled shutdown (e.g.,
: b. ~ 50   gpm primary coolant. leak
cooldown rate exceeding technical specifi-cation limits, pipe cracking found during oper-ation) 22.
: c. Loss of containment integrity
Transportation of contaminated injured individual from site to offsite hospital 23.
: 2. Loss of one     fission product barrier as above combined   with inoperability of a single complete safety system when needed, or which cannot       be restored operable within 1S minutes
Rapid depressurization of PWR secondary side.
: a. ECCS   subsystem
12.3.5.5.2 Alert Initiatin Criteria 1.
: b. Containment Spray
Loss of one fission product barrier
: c. Diesels
- a.
: 12. 3-66                 Revision 0 March 1, 1981
~ 300 ~Ci/cc I-131 coolant sample b.
~50 gpm Primary Coolant Leak Rate c.
Loss of containment integrity
: 12. 3-65 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
2.
Inoperability of a single complete safety system and which cannot be returned to operable within 15 minutes a.
ECCS subsystems b.
Containment Spray c.
Diesels d.
Control Room Evacuation e.
Batteries 3.
O 2 mR/hr at Site Boundary under actual conditions 4.
Other hazards, occurrences, or natural phenomena experienced on-site warranting activation of off-site response forces 12.3.5.5.3 Site Emer enc Initiatin Criteria 1.
Loss of or potential loss of two fission prod~et barriers
. a. ~ 300 ~Ci/cc coolant sample (I-131)
: b. ~ 50 gpm primary coolant. leak c.
Loss of containment integrity 2.
Loss of one fission product barrier as above combined with inoperability of a single complete safety system when needed, or which cannot be restored operable within 1S minutes a.
ECCS subsystem b.
Containment Spray c.
Diesels
: 12. 3-66 Revision 0
March 1, 1981


I
I
(
(
: d. Control   Room Evacuated
 
: e. Batteries OR inoperability of   two complete safety systems when needed
d.
: 3. ~ 50 mR/hr whole body   at site boundary under existing conditions
Control Room Evacuated e.
              ~250 mR/hr thyroid at site boundary under existing conditions
Batteries OR inoperability of two complete safety systems when needed
: 4. Natural   phenomena   experienced beyond design basis levels. Other hazards:
: 3. ~ 50 mR/hr whole body at site boundary under existing conditions
Winds, tornado, Earthquake
~250 mR/hr thyroid at site boundary under existing conditions 4.
: 5. Other conditions occurring on-site warranting notification of the public to take precautionary measures   or prepare to take such measures.
Natural phenomena experienced beyond design basis levels.
12.3.5.5.4 General Emer enc     Xnitiatinq Criteria
Other hazards:
: 1. Loss of or potential loss of' fission product.
Winds, tornado, Earthquake 5.
barriers
Other conditions occurring on-site warranting notification of the public to take precautionary measures or prepare to take such measures.
: a. ~300 aCi/cc I-131 coolant sample
12.3.5.5.4 General Emer enc Xnitiatinq Criteria 1.
: b. ~50   gpm primary leak rate
Loss of or potential loss of' fission product.
: c. Loss of containment integrity
barriers a.
: 2. Loss of two fission product barriers combined with inoperability of single complete safety system, when needed or which cannot be restored to operable within     15 minutes
~300 aCi/cc I-131 coolant sample
: a. ECCS subsystem
: b. ~50 gpm primary leak rate c.
: b. Containment Spray
Loss of containment integrity 2.
: 12. 3-67                 Revision 0 March.l, 1981
Loss of two fission product barriers combined with inoperability of single complete safety
: c. Diesel s
: system, when needed or which cannot be restored to operable within 15 minutes a.
: d. Control Room   Evacuated
ECCS subsystem b.
: e. Batteries
Containment Spray
: 3. N1 R/hr whole body at site boundary under existing conditions
: 12. 3-67 Revision 0
                ~5 R/hr thyroid at site boundary under existing conditions
March.l, 1981
: 4. Other plant conditions exist that make release of large amounts of radioactivity in a short time possible.
 
: 12. 3.5. 6 Exam   le Events 12.3.5.6.1 Exam le Alert Initiatin Events
c.
: 1. Severe loss of fuel cladding
Diesel s d.
: a. Very high   coolan'ctivity     sample (e.g.,
Control Room Evacuated e.
300wCi/cc equivalent     of I-131)
Batteries 3.
: b. Failed fuel monitor. (PWR) indicates increase greater than 1% fuel failures within 30 minutes or 5% total fuel failures
N1 R/hr whole body at site boundary under existing conditions
: 2. Rapid gross   failure of   one or more steam generator tubes with or without     3,oss of offsite   power
~5 R/hr thyroid at site boundary under existing conditions 4.
: 3. Steam line break with significant (e.g.,
Other plant conditions exist that make release of large amounts of radioactivity in a short time possible.
greater than 10 gpm) primary to secondary leak rate or with MS'XV malfunction
: 12. 3.5. 6 Exam le Events 12.3.5.6.1 Exam le Alert Initiatin Events 1.
: 4. Primary coolant leak rate greater than       50 gpm
Severe loss of fuel cladding a.
: 12. 3-68                 Revision   0 March 1, 1981
Very high coolan'ctivity sample (e.g.,
300wCi/cc equivalent of I-131) b.
Failed fuel monitor.
(PWR) indicates increase greater than 1% fuel failures within 30 minutes or 5% total fuel failures 2.
Rapid gross failure of one or more steam generator tubes with or without 3,oss of offsite power 3.
Steam line break with significant (e.g.,
greater than 10 gpm) primary to secondary leak rate or with MS'XV malfunction 4.
Primary coolant leak rate greater than 50 gpm
: 12. 3-68 Revision 0
March 1, 1981


I
I
    ~                             ~
 
: 5. High radiation levels or high airborne con-tamination which indicate a severe degradation in the control of radioactive materials (e.g.,
~
increase of factor of 1000 in direct radiation readings)
~
: 6. Loss of offsite power   and loss of all onsite AC power
5.
: 7. Loss of all onsite   DC power
High radiation levels or high airborne con-tamination which indicate a severe degradation in the control of radioactive materials (e.g.,
: 8. Coolant   pump seizure leading to fuel failure
increase of factor of 1000 in direct radiation readings) 6.
: 9. Loss of functions needed for plant cold shutdown
Loss of offsite power and loss of all onsite AC power 7.
: 10. Fuel damage accident with release of radio-activity to containment or fuel handling building
Loss of all onsite DC power 8.
: 11. Fire potentially affecting safety systems
Coolant pump seizure leading to fuel failure 9.
: 12. All alarms (annunciators) lost
Loss of functions needed for plant cold shutdown 10.
: 13. Radiological effluents'greater than 10 times technical specification instantaneous limits (an instantaneous rate which,     if continued over 2 hours, would result   in about 1 mR at the site boundary under average meteorological conditions)
Fuel damage accident with release of radio-activity to containment or fuel handling building 11.
: 14. Ongoing security compromise
Fire potentially affecting safety systems 12.
: 15. Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected
All alarms (annunciators) lost 13.
: a. Earthquake greater than     OBE levels
Radiological effluents'greater than 10 times technical specification instantaneous limits (an instantaneous rate which, if continued over 2 hours, would result in about 1
: b. Flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane surge, seiche near design levels 12.3-69                 Revision 0 March 1, 1981
mR at the site boundary under average meteorological conditions) 14.
Ongoing security compromise 15.
Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected a.
Earthquake greater than OBE levels b.
: Flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane
: surge, seiche near design levels 12.3-69 Revision 0
March 1, 1981


I
I
: c. Any tornado    striking facility
: d. Hurricane winds near design basis level
: 16. Other hazards being experienced or projected
: a. Aircraft crash    on  facility
: b. Missile impacts from whatever source    on facility
: c. Known  explosion  damage  to facility affect-ing plant operation
: d. Entry into facility environs of toxic or flammable gases
: e. Turbine  failure  causing casing penetration
: 17. Other plant conditions exist that warrant.
precautionary activation of technical support center and near-site emergency operations center
: 18. Evacuation of control room anticipated or required with control of shutdown systems established from local stations 12.3.5.6.2 Exam  le Site  Emer enc    Initiatin  Events
: 1. Degraded core    with possible loss of eoolable
                .geometry (indicators should include instru-mentation to detect inadequate core cooling, coolant activity and/or containment radio-activity levels)
: 2. Rapid failure of more than 10 steam generator tubes with loss of offsite power
: 12. 3-70                  Revision 0 March 1, 1981
: 3. PWR  steam  line break with greater than 50 gpm primary to secondary leakage and significant indication of fuel damage
: 4. Loss of offsite power and loss of onsite AC power for more than 15 minutes
: 5. Loss of all vital onsite DC power for more than 15 minutes
: 6. Loss  of functions  needed for plant hot shut-down
: 7. Fire affecting safety systems
: 8. All alarms (annunciators) lost for'ore than 15 minutes and plant is not in cold shutdown or plant transient initiated while all alarms lost
: 9. a. Effluent monitors detect levels correspond-ing to greater than 50 mR/hr for 4 hour or greater than 500 mR/hr W.B. for two minutes (or five times these. levels to the thyroid) at 'the site boundary for existing meteorology
: b. These dose  rates're  projected based  on other plant parameters  (e.g., radiation level in containment. with leak rate appro-priate for existing containment pressure) or are measured in the environs
: 10. Imminent loss of physical control of the plant
: 12. 3-71                Revision 0 March 1, 1981
: 11. Severe natural phenomena      being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown
: a. Earthquake greater than SSE levels
: b. Flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane surge, seiche greater than design levels or failure of protection of vital equipment at lower levels
: c. Winds in excess of design levels
: 12. Other hazards being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown
: a. Aircraft crash affecting vital structures by impact or fire
: b. Severe damage to safe shutdown equipment from missiles or explosion
: c. Entry of toxic or flammable gases vital areas
: 13. Other plant conditions exist      that warrant activation of    emergency centers    and monitor-ing teams and    a  precautionary public  notifi-cation
: 14. Evacuation of control room and control of shutdown systems not established from local stations in  15  minutes 12.3.5.6.3 Exam le General  Emer enc    Initiatin    Events
: 1. Small and large LOCA's with      failure of ECCS to perform leading to severe core degradation 12.3-72                    Revision  0 March 1, 1981


or melt. Ultimate failure of containment likely  for melt sequences.     (Several hours available for response)
c.
: 2. Transient initiated by loss of feedwater        and condensate  systems  (principal heat removal system) followed by failure of emergency feed-water system for extended period. Core melting possible in several hours. Ultimate failure of containment  likely if core melts.
Any tornado striking facility d.
: 3. Transient requiring operation of shutdown systems with failure to scram. Core damage for some designs. Additional failure of core cooling and makeup systems would lead to core melt.
Hurricane winds near design basis level 16.
: 4. Failure of offsite and onsite power along with total loss of emergency feedwater makeup capability for several hours would lead to eventual core melt and likely failure of con-tainment.
Other hazards being experienced or projected a.
5.. Small  LOCA and    initially successful  ECCS.
Aircraft crash on facility b.
Subsequent  failure of   containment heat removal systems over several hours could lead to core melt and   likely failure of   containment.
Missile impacts from whatever source on facility c.
12 ~ 3 73                  Revision   0 March 1, 1981
Known explosion damage to facility affect-ing plant operation d.
Entry into facility environs of toxic or flammable gases e.
Turbine failure causing casing penetration 17.
Other plant conditions exist that warrant.
precautionary activation of technical support center and near-site emergency operations center 18.
Evacuation of control room anticipated or required with control of shutdown systems established from local stations 12.3.5.6.2 Exam le Site Emer enc Initiatin Events 1.
Degraded core with possible loss of eoolable
.geometry (indicators should include instru-mentation to detect inadequate core cooling, coolant activity and/or containment radio-activity levels) 2.
Rapid failure of more than 10 steam generator tubes with loss of offsite power
: 12. 3-70 Revision 0
March 1, 1981


12.3.5.7       Emergency Classification of FSAR Postulated Transients The FSAR postulated transients are classified into emergency event categories as indicated below. The transients are bounded by the conditions set forth in Chapter 14 of the FSAR. Reference to the applic-able FSAR section is indicated by the number in
3.
(     ) ~
PWR steam line break with greater than 50 gpm primary to secondary leakage and significant indication of fuel damage 4.
Emergency        Example FSAR Event Descri   tion               Classification       No.
Loss of offsite power and loss of onsite AC power for more than 15 minutes 5.
: 1. Uncontrolled Rod   Withdrawal     Unusual Event        13 (subcritical)
Loss of all vital onsite DC power for more than 15 minutes 6.
Loss of functions needed for plant hot shut-down 7.
Fire affecting safety systems 8.
All alarms (annunciators) lost for'ore than 15 minutes and plant is not in cold shutdown or plant transient initiated while all alarms lost 9.
a.
Effluent monitors detect levels correspond-ing to greater than 50 mR/hr for 4 hour or greater than 500 mR/hr W.B. for two minutes (or five times these. levels to the thyroid) at 'the site boundary for existing meteorology b.
These dose rates're projected based on other plant parameters (e.g., radiation level in containment. with leak rate appro-priate for existing containment pressure) or are measured in the environs 10.
Imminent loss of physical control of the plant
: 12. 3-71 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
11.
Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown a.
Earthquake greater than SSE levels b.
: Flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane
: surge, seiche greater than design levels or failure of protection of vital equipment at lower levels c.
Winds in excess of design levels 12.
Other hazards being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown a.
Aircraft crash affecting vital structures by impact or fire b.
Severe damage to safe shutdown equipment from missiles or explosion c.
Entry of toxic or flammable gases vital areas 13.
Other plant conditions exist that warrant activation of emergency centers and monitor-ing teams and a precautionary public notifi-cation 14.
Evacuation of control room and control of shutdown systems not established from local stations in 15 minutes 12.3.5.6.3 Exam le General Emer enc Initiatin Events 1.
Small and large LOCA's with failure of ECCS to perform leading to severe core degradation 12.3-72 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
or melt.
Ultimate failure of containment likely for melt sequences.
(Several hours available for response) 2.
Transient initiated by loss of feedwater and condensate systems (principal heat removal system) followed by failure of emergency feed-water system for extended period.
Core melting possible in several hours.
Ultimate failure of containment likely if core melts.
3.
Transient requiring operation of shutdown systems with failure to scram.
Core damage for some designs.
Additional failure of core cooling and makeup systems would lead to core melt.
4.
Failure of offsite and onsite power along with total loss of emergency feedwater makeup capability for several hours would lead to eventual core melt and likely failure of con-tainment.
5..
Small LOCA and initially successful ECCS.
Subsequent failure of containment heat removal systems over several hours could lead to core melt and likely failure of containment.
12 ~ 3 73 Revision 0
March 1, 1981
 
12.3.5.7 Emergency Classification of FSAR Postulated Transients The FSAR postulated transients are classified into emergency event categories as indicated below.
The transients are bounded by the conditions set forth in Chapter 14 of the FSAR.
Reference to the applic-able FSAR section is indicated by the number in
(
) ~
FSAR Event Descri tion Emergency Classification Example No.
1.
Uncontrolled Rod Withdrawal (subcritical)
(14.1.1).
(14.1.1).
: 2. Uncontrolled Rod   Withdrawal     Unusual Event        14 (at power)
Unusual Event 13 2.
Uncontrolled Rod Withdrawal (at power)
(14.'1.2)
(14.'1.2)
: 3. RCCA Misalignment                 Unu'sual Event (14.1. 3) or (14.1. 4)
Unusual Event 14 3.
: 4. CVCS Malfunction                 Unusual Event (14.1.5')
RCCA Misalignment (14.1. 3) or (14.1. 4)
: 5. Loss of Reactor Coolant           Unusual Event        17 Flow (14.1.6)
Unu'sual Event 4.
: 6. Inactive Loop Startup (14.1.7)
CVCS Malfunction (14.1.5')
: 7. Loss of Load (14.1.8)
Unusual Event 5.
: 8. Loss of,-Normal Feedwater (14.1.9)
Loss of Reactor Coolant Flow (14.1.6)
*Not classified as an Emergency Condition 12.3-74               Revision 0 March 1, 1981
Unusual Event 17 6.
Inactive Loop Startup (14.1.7) 7.
Loss of Load (14.1.8) 8.
Loss of,-Normal Feedwater (14.1.9)
*Not classified as an Emergency Condition 12.3-74 Revision 0
March 1, 1981


Emergency        Example FSAR Event Descri     tion             Classification        No.
FSAR Event Descri tion 9.
: 9. Feedwater System                 Unusual Event          18 Malfunction (14.1.10)
Feedwater System Malfunction (14.1.10) 10.
: 10. Excessive Load Xncrease           Unusual Event (14.1.11)
Excessive Load Xncrease (14.1.11) 11.
: 11. Loss   of All AC   Power to       Unusual Event.
Loss of All AC Power to Station (14.1.12) 12.
Station (14.1.12)
Turbine Generator Accident (14.1.12) 13.
: 12. Turbine Generator Accident       Unusual Event (14.1.12)
Fuel Handling Accident (14.2.1) 14.
: 13. Fuel Handling Accident           Alert                10 (14.2.1)
Accidental Licpxid Release (14.2.2) 15.
: 14. Accidental Licpxid Release       Alert                13 (14.2.2)
Accidental Gaseous Relesae (14.2.3) 16.
: 15. Accidental Gaseous Relesae       Alert                13 (14.2.3)
S.G.
: 16. S.G. Tube Rupture                 Alert (14. 2. 4 )
Tube Rupture (14. 2. 4 )
: 17. Steam   Line Break               Unusual Event      18, 1, 21 (14.2.5)
17.
: 18. Control     Rod Ejection         Alert (14. 2. 6)
Steam Line Break (14.2.5) 18.
: 19. Secondary Side Release           Unusual Event          3 (14.2.7)                         Alert                  1
Control Rod Ejection (14. 2. 6) 19.
: 20. LOCA                             Alert (14. 3)
Secondary Side Release (14.2.7) 20.
NOTE:   Majority of these examples could be classified more or less severely depending on actual conditions present at the time.
LOCA (14. 3)
12.3-75               Revision   0 March 1, 1981
Emergency Classification Unusual Event Unusual Event Unusual Event.
Unusual Event Alert Alert Alert Alert Unusual Event Alert Unusual Event Alert Alert Example No.
18 10 13 13 18, 1, 21 3
1 NOTE:
Majority of these examples could be classified more or less severely depending on actual conditions present at the time.
12.3-75 Revision 0
March 1, 1981


Pages 12.3-76 through 12.3-91 have been left blank intentionally.
Pages 12.3-76 through 12.3-91 have been left blank intentionally.
ATTACHMENT 3 TO AEP:NRC'0308F
ATTACHMENT 3 TO AEP:NRC'0308F


INSERT TO APPENDIX A
INSERT TO APPENDIX A


                        ~
~ INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C.
INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN       POWER COMPANY DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Ident> scat>on                                               evssson No Number                     Title                          And Date      Comments PMP 2080 EPP.001   Emergency Plan Activation               Revision  0 and Condition Classification               4-1-81 EPP.002 Unusual Evept                           Revision 0 4-1-81 EP P.003 Al crt                                  Revision 0 4-1-81
COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Ident>
        . EPP.004  Site Emergency                          Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.005  General Emergency                        Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.006 Initial   Dose Assessments       and   "
scat>on Number PMP 2080 EPP.001 Title Emergency Plan Activation and Condition Classification evssson No And Date Revision 0
Revision 0 Veri f ication  (Gaseous)     -          ~ 4-1-81 EPP.007 Initial   Release Assessments           Revision
4-1-81 Comments EPP.002 Unusual Evept EP P.003 Alcrt
                                                            . 4-1-81 0
. EPP.004 Site Emergency EPP.005 General Emergency Revision 0
and  Verification (Liquid)
4-1-81 Revision 0
EPP.008 Calling   Of f-Duty Plant               Revision 0 Personnel                                  4-1-81 EPP.009  Fire  Emergency Guidelines          . Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.010  Chl orine Gas Release                    Revision 0 Gu idel ines                                4-1-81 EPP.Oll  Natural Emergency Guidelines            Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.012 Initial  Of f-Site                     Revision 0 No tifications                              4-1-81 EPP.013  Duties of the Individual      Who      Revision 0 Discovers an Emergency                     4-1-81 Condition Page 1 .
4-1-81 Revision 0
Rev. Date 4-1-81
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.006 Initial Dose Assessments and
" Revision 0
Verification (Gaseous)
~ 4-1-81 EPP.007 Initial Release Assessments and Verification (Liquid)
Revision 0
. 4-1-81 EPP.008 Calling Off-Duty Plant Personnel EPP.009 Fire Emergency Guidelines EPP.010 Chl orine Gas Release Gu idel ines EPP.Oll Natural Emergency Guidelines EPP.012 Initial Off-Site Notifications EPP.013 Duties of the Individual Who Discovers an Emergency Condition Revision 0
4-1-81
. Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Page 1
Rev.
Date 4-1-81
 
INDIAN'A 5 MICHIGAN POHER COMPANY DONALD C.
COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index ent1 1 cation Number Title evasion No.
And Date Comments PMP 2081 EPP.001 Emergency Communications EPP.002 Barring of the PBX Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.003 Follow-Up Off-Site Comnunications Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.004 Protective Action Guides Revision 0
(PAGs) and Protective Actions 4-1-81 EPP.005 Personnel Accountability and Revision 0
Site Evacuation 4-1-81 EPP.006 Activation of the Reentry and Rescue Team Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.007 Security Actions During Emergency Conditions Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.008 Emergency Medical Plan Guidelines EPP.009 Health Physics Procedures EPP.010 Activation of Radiation Monitoring Teams EPP.011 On-Site Radiological Monitoring EPP.012 Off-Site Radiological Monitoring EPP.013 Environmental Monitoring and Analysis Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Page 2
Rev.
Date 4-1-81
 
INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C.
COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Ident> >cation Number Title ev>sson No.
And Date Comments PHP 2081 EPP.014 Off-Site Dose Assessments Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.015 Sampling and Analysis of Waterborne Releases EPP.016 Collection and Analysis of Liquid and Gaseous Samples EPP.017 Interpretation of Liquid and Gaseous Samples EPP.018 Transportation Accidents Involving Radioactive Material EPP.019 AEP Emergency
 
===Response===
Organization Activation and Management Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0.
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.020 Activation and Operation of Revision 0.
the Technical Support Center 4-1-81 (TSC)
EPP.021 Activation and Operation of the Operations Staging Area (OSA)
Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.022 EPP.023 Activation and Operation of the Recovery Center (RC)
(An Emergency Operations Facility)
Activation and Operation of the Emergency Control Center (ECC)
(An Emergency Operations Facility)
Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.024 Activation and Operation of 'evision 0
the Joint Public Information 4-1-81 Center (JPIC)
(An Emergency Operations Facility)
Page 3
Rev.
Date 4-1-81


INDIAN'A 5 MICHIGAN POHER COMPANY DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index ent1 1 cation                                    evasion No.
~
Number                  Title                  And Date       Comments PMP 2081 EPP.001  Emergency Communications        Revision  0 4-1-81 EPP.002  Barring of the   PBX            Revision  0 4-1-81 EPP.003  Follow-Up Off-Site             Revision  0 Comnunications                    4-1-81 EPP.004  Protective Action Guides        Revision  0 (PAGs) and Protective Actions    4-1-81 EPP.005  Personnel Accountability and   Revision  0 Site Evacuation                  4-1-81 EPP.006 Activation of the Reentry      Revision  0 and Rescue  Team                  4-1-81 EPP.007 Security Actions During        Revision 0 Emergency Conditions              4-1-81 EPP.008 Emergency Medical Plan          Revision 0 Guidelines                        4-1-81 EPP.009 Health Physics Procedures      Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.010 Activation of Radiation        Revision 0 Monitoring  Teams                  4-1-81 EPP.011 On-Site Radiological            Revision  0 Monitoring                        4-1-81 EPP.012 Of f-Site Radiological          Revision  0 Monitoring                        4-1-81 EPP.013 Environmental Monitoring        Revision 0 and  Analysis                      4-1-81 Page 2 Rev. Date 4-1-81
~
Iki&JANA 5 tlICHIGAN POHF.R COMPANY
~HALD C.
COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT flANAGER PROCEDURE Index
, Identification Number Title Revision No.
And Date Comments PblP 2081 EPP.025 Activation and Operation of the Emergency Hews (ENS)
(An Emergency Source Operations Facility)
EPP.026 Personnel Assignment to Off-Site Centers EPP.027 Off-Site Support and Assistance
'PP.028 Damage Control, Repair and Recovery Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Page 4
Rev.
Date 4-1-81


INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN      POWER COMPANY DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Ident> >cation                                            ev>sson No.
~,
Number                     Title   .                   And Date           Comments PHP 2081 EPP.014    Off-Site  Dose Assessments          Revision   0 4-1-81 EPP.015    Sampling and Analysis      of       Revision   0 Waterborne Releases                    4-1-81 EPP.016    Collection  and Analysis of        Revision 0.
e'
Liquid and  Gaseous Samples            4-1-81 EPP.017    Interpretation of Liquid            Revision   0 and Gaseous    Samples                4-1-81 EPP.018    Transportation Accidents            Revision   0 Involving Radioactive                  4-1-81 Material EPP.019  AEP Emergency    Response            Revision   0 Organization Activation      and      4-1-81 Management EPP.020  Activation  and Operation of        Revision   0 .
~
the Technical Support Center            4-1-81 (TSC)
I "I
EPP.021  Activation  and Operation of        Revision   0 the Operations Staging Area            4-1-81 (OSA)
ANA 5 MICilIGAN PO>lER COMPANY DONALD C.
EPP.022  Activation    and Operation of       Revision   0 the Recovery Center (RC) (An          4-1-81 Emergency Operations Facility)
COOK NUCLFAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Identification.
EPP.023  Activation    and Operation of        Revision 0 the Emergency Control Center            4-1-81 (ECC) (An Emergency Operations    Facility)
Number Title Revision No.
EPP.024  Activation and Operation of 'evision            0 the Joint Public Information            4-1-81 Center (JPIC) (An Emergency Operations Facility)
And Date Comments PMP 2082 EPP.001 Emergency Exposure Guidelines Revision 0
Page 3 Rev. Date 4-1-81
4-1-81 EPP.002 Public Information Dissemination EPP.003 Maintenance of Emergency Records EPP.004 Emergency Per sonne 1
As s ignments Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.005 Tests, Drills and Exercises Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.006 Training Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.007 Emergency Equipment and Supplies EPP.008 Maps and Forms Revision 0
4-1-81 Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP.009 Maintenance of the Emergency Revision 0
Plan Procedures 4-1-81 EPP Appendix A
Telephone and Call Numbers Revision 0
4-1-81 EPP Appendix 8
Memorial Hospital Plan Revision 0
4-1-81 Page 5
Rev.
Date 4-1-81


~  ~
'APPENDIX B
Iki&JANA 5 tlICHIGAN  POHF.R COMPANY
The AEP Emergency
                                ~HALD    C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT flANAGER PROCEDURE Index Identification                                        Revision No.
  ,
Number                    Title                    And Date        Comments PblP 2081 EPP.025  Activation  and  Operation of      Revision 0 the Emergency    Hews  (ENS)        4-1-81 (An Emergency Source Operations  Facility)
EPP.026 Personnel  Assignment to          Revision 0 Off-Site Centers                      4-1-81 EPP.027 Off-Site Support    and            Revision 0 Assistance                            4-1-81
              'PP.028  Damage  Control, Repair    and    Revision 0 Recovery                              4-1-81 Page 4 Rev. Date 4-1-81


~, e'  &. <<
===Response===
      ~  I "I  ANA 5 MICilIGAN PO>lER COMPANY DONALD C. COOK NUCLFAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Identif ication.                                    Revision No.
Organization Procedures will be incorporated into a single document entitled the AEP Emergency
Number                    Title                  And Date        Comments PMP 2082 EPP.001  Emergency Exposure Guidelines Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.002 Public Information                Revision 0 Dissemination                        4-1-81 EPP.003 Maintenance    of  Emergency      Revision 0 Records                              4-1-81 EPP.004 Emergency Per sonne    1          Revision 0 As s ignments                        4-1-81 EPP.005 Tests,    Drills  and Exercises  Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.006 Training                          Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.007 Emergency Equipment and            Revision 0 Supplies                            4-1-81 EPP.008 Maps and Forms                    Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP.009 Maintenance of the Emergency       Revision 0 Plan Procedures                      4-1-81 EPP Appendix  A  Telephone and Call Numbers        Revision 0 4-1-81 EPP Appendix  8  Memorial Hospital Plan            Revision 0 4-1-81 Page 5 Rev. Date 4-1-81


                                    'APPENDIX B The AEP Emergency Response  Organization Procedures will be incorporated into  a  single document entitled the AEP Emergency Response Manual. This manual will contain subsections which provide the procedures outlining the job functions and responsibilities of each AEP-ERO manager designated on the organization chart Figure 12.3-4 as well as identification of the specific individuals who   fill position in the AEP-ERO by title.,}}
===Response===
Manual.
This manual will contain subsections which provide the procedures outlining the job functions and responsibilities of each AEP-ERO manager designated on the organization chart Figure 12.3-4 as well as identification of the specific individuals who fill position in the AEP-ERO by title.,}}

Latest revision as of 16:35, 7 January 2025

Forwards Public Version of Addl Info to Be Inserted in 810102 Revised Emergency Plan
ML17319A852
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/1981
From: Hunter R
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17319A851 List:
References
AEP:NRC:00308F, AEP:NRC:308F, NUDOCS 8105140231
Download: ML17319A852 (31)


Text

INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P. 0.

BOX 18 BOWLING.GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N. Y. 10004 March 2, 1981 AEP:NRC:00308F Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos.

1 and 2

Docket Nos.

50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.

OPR-58 and DPR-74 EMERGENCY PLAN INSERTS Mt. Harold R. Oenton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.

C.

20555

Dear Mr. Denton:

The attachments to this letter transmit the additional information committed to by the submittal of our Emergency Plan under AEP:NRC:00308B, dated January 26, 1981.

Since this information is an insert to the original documents we have transmitted to you, we are not treating this as a formal revision or change to the documents you now have.

One control copy and nine additional copies of the inserts are being sent to you.

Three copies of the inserts are also being transmitted to the NRC Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement under separate cover.

Very truly yours, S. Hunter Vice President cc:

John E. Dolan R.

W. Jurgensen R.

C. Callen G. Charnoff D. V. Shaller - Bridgman NRC Region III Resident Inspector - Bridgman NRC Region III Office of Inspection and Enforcement yDC5 i/(o PERSONAL PRIVACYINPORIATION DELETED IN ACCORDANCE5ITH THE FREEDOM Or XmZOZ,mTION ACX

ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC;0308F PERSONAL PRIVACY INFORMATION DELETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZBEMOMOF INFORMATIONACT

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd.)

Title Pacae 12.3.4.1 Interagency Radiological Assistance Plan (IRAP)

'12.3.4.2 Off-Site Representatives 12.3.4.3 Off-Site Agencies and Organizations 12.3 '

EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPORT AND RESOURCES

12. 3-48
12. 3-49 12.3-52 12.3-52 12.3.5.3 Emergency Protective Action Guidelines All Classifications Gaseous Release (Four Charts)
12. 3. 5 EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 12.3.5.1 Emergency Action Levels 12.3.5.2 Protective Actions 12.3-54 12.3-55 12.3-56 12.3-58 12.3.5.4 Emergency Protective Action Guidelines All Clc.ssifications-Liquid Releases
12. 3-62 12.3.5.5 Initiating Conditions 12.3.5.6 Example Events 12.3.5.7 Emergency Classification of FSAR Postulated Transients 12.3-63 12.3-68
12. 3-74 12.3.6.1 Notification of Emergency

Response

Personnel and Organizations 12.3.6.1.1 On-Site 12.3.6.1.2 Off-Site (Plant Staff) 12.3.6.1.3 Off-Site Response Organizations 12.3.6 NOTIFICATION METHODS AND PROCEDURES 12.3-92 12.3-93

12. 3-93
12. 3-94
12. 3-95
12. 3. 6. 2 Levels of Implementation for Alerting, Notifying and Mobilizing

Response

Personnel

12. 3-97 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

12.3.5.5 Initiatin Conditions 12.3.5.5.1 Unusual Event Initiatin Criteria 1.

ECCS initiated 2.

Radiological effluent technical specification limits exceeded 3.

Fuel damage indication.

Examples:

a.

High coolant activity sample (e.g.,

exceed-ing coolant technical specifications for iodine spike) b.

Failed fuel monitor (PWR) indicates increase greater than 0.1% equivalent fuel failures within 30 minutes.

4.

'Abnormal coolant temperature and/or pressure or abnormal fuel temperatures 5.

Exceeding either primary/secondary leak rate technical specification or primary system leak rate technical specification.

C 6.

Failure of a safety or relief valve to close 7.

Loss of offsite power or loss of onsite AC power capability 8.

Loss of containment integrity requiring shut-down by technical specifications 9.

Loss of engineered safety feature or fire protection system function requiring shutdown by technical specifications (e.g.,

because of 12.3-63 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

malfunction, personnel error or procedural inadequacy) 10.

Fire lasting more than 10 minutes 11.

Indications or alarms on process or effluent parameters not functional in control room to an extent requiring plant shutdown or other significant loss of assessment or communication capability (e.g., plant computer, all meteoro-logical instrumentation) 12.

Security threat or attempted entry or attempted sabotage 13.

Uncontrolled rod 'withdrawal from a subcritical condition 14.

.Uncontrolled rod withdrawal at power 15.

Dropped RCCA assembly.: or bank 16.

Uncontrolled dilution 17.

Loss of one or more reactor coolant pumps above 50% power 18.

Excessive Tavg-Tref Deviation 19.

Natural phenomenon M.ing experienced or projected beyond usual levels a.

Any earthquake b.

50 year flood or low water, t'sunami, hurricane

surge, seiche c.,

Any tornado near site d.

Any hurricane

12. 3-64 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

. 0 20.

Other hazards being experienced or projected a.

Aircraft crash on-site or unusual aircraft activity over facility b.

Train derailment on-site c.

Near or on-site explosion d.

Near or on-site toxic or flammable gas release e.

Turbine failure 21.

Other plant conditions exist that warrant increased awareness on the part, of State and/or local offsite authorities or require plant shut-down under technical specification requirements or involve other than normal controlled shutdown (e.g.,

cooldown rate exceeding technical specifi-cation limits, pipe cracking found during oper-ation) 22.

Transportation of contaminated injured individual from site to offsite hospital 23.

Rapid depressurization of PWR secondary side.

12.3.5.5.2 Alert Initiatin Criteria 1.

Loss of one fission product barrier

- a.

~ 300 ~Ci/cc I-131 coolant sample b.

~50 gpm Primary Coolant Leak Rate c.

Loss of containment integrity

12. 3-65 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

2.

Inoperability of a single complete safety system and which cannot be returned to operable within 15 minutes a.

ECCS subsystems b.

Containment Spray c.

Diesels d.

Control Room Evacuation e.

Batteries 3.

O 2 mR/hr at Site Boundary under actual conditions 4.

Other hazards, occurrences, or natural phenomena experienced on-site warranting activation of off-site response forces 12.3.5.5.3 Site Emer enc Initiatin Criteria 1.

Loss of or potential loss of two fission prod~et barriers

. a. ~ 300 ~Ci/cc coolant sample (I-131)

b. ~ 50 gpm primary coolant. leak c.

Loss of containment integrity 2.

Loss of one fission product barrier as above combined with inoperability of a single complete safety system when needed, or which cannot be restored operable within 1S minutes a.

ECCS subsystem b.

Containment Spray c.

Diesels

12. 3-66 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

I

(

d.

Control Room Evacuated e.

Batteries OR inoperability of two complete safety systems when needed

3. ~ 50 mR/hr whole body at site boundary under existing conditions

~250 mR/hr thyroid at site boundary under existing conditions 4.

Natural phenomena experienced beyond design basis levels.

Other hazards:

Winds, tornado, Earthquake 5.

Other conditions occurring on-site warranting notification of the public to take precautionary measures or prepare to take such measures.

12.3.5.5.4 General Emer enc Xnitiatinq Criteria 1.

Loss of or potential loss of' fission product.

barriers a.

~300 aCi/cc I-131 coolant sample

b. ~50 gpm primary leak rate c.

Loss of containment integrity 2.

Loss of two fission product barriers combined with inoperability of single complete safety

system, when needed or which cannot be restored to operable within 15 minutes a.

ECCS subsystem b.

Containment Spray

12. 3-67 Revision 0

March.l, 1981

c.

Diesel s d.

Control Room Evacuated e.

Batteries 3.

N1 R/hr whole body at site boundary under existing conditions

~5 R/hr thyroid at site boundary under existing conditions 4.

Other plant conditions exist that make release of large amounts of radioactivity in a short time possible.

12. 3.5. 6 Exam le Events 12.3.5.6.1 Exam le Alert Initiatin Events 1.

Severe loss of fuel cladding a.

Very high coolan'ctivity sample (e.g.,

300wCi/cc equivalent of I-131) b.

Failed fuel monitor.

(PWR) indicates increase greater than 1% fuel failures within 30 minutes or 5% total fuel failures 2.

Rapid gross failure of one or more steam generator tubes with or without 3,oss of offsite power 3.

Steam line break with significant (e.g.,

greater than 10 gpm) primary to secondary leak rate or with MS'XV malfunction 4.

Primary coolant leak rate greater than 50 gpm

12. 3-68 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

I

~

~

5.

High radiation levels or high airborne con-tamination which indicate a severe degradation in the control of radioactive materials (e.g.,

increase of factor of 1000 in direct radiation readings) 6.

Loss of offsite power and loss of all onsite AC power 7.

Loss of all onsite DC power 8.

Coolant pump seizure leading to fuel failure 9.

Loss of functions needed for plant cold shutdown 10.

Fuel damage accident with release of radio-activity to containment or fuel handling building 11.

Fire potentially affecting safety systems 12.

All alarms (annunciators) lost 13.

Radiological effluents'greater than 10 times technical specification instantaneous limits (an instantaneous rate which, if continued over 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, would result in about 1

mR at the site boundary under average meteorological conditions) 14.

Ongoing security compromise 15.

Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected a.

Earthquake greater than OBE levels b.

Flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane
surge, seiche near design levels 12.3-69 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

I

c.

Any tornado striking facility d.

Hurricane winds near design basis level 16.

Other hazards being experienced or projected a.

Aircraft crash on facility b.

Missile impacts from whatever source on facility c.

Known explosion damage to facility affect-ing plant operation d.

Entry into facility environs of toxic or flammable gases e.

Turbine failure causing casing penetration 17.

Other plant conditions exist that warrant.

precautionary activation of technical support center and near-site emergency operations center 18.

Evacuation of control room anticipated or required with control of shutdown systems established from local stations 12.3.5.6.2 Exam le Site Emer enc Initiatin Events 1.

Degraded core with possible loss of eoolable

.geometry (indicators should include instru-mentation to detect inadequate core cooling, coolant activity and/or containment radio-activity levels) 2.

Rapid failure of more than 10 steam generator tubes with loss of offsite power

12. 3-70 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

3.

PWR steam line break with greater than 50 gpm primary to secondary leakage and significant indication of fuel damage 4.

Loss of offsite power and loss of onsite AC power for more than 15 minutes 5.

Loss of all vital onsite DC power for more than 15 minutes 6.

Loss of functions needed for plant hot shut-down 7.

Fire affecting safety systems 8.

All alarms (annunciators) lost for'ore than 15 minutes and plant is not in cold shutdown or plant transient initiated while all alarms lost 9.

a.

Effluent monitors detect levels correspond-ing to greater than 50 mR/hr for 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> or greater than 500 mR/hr W.B. for two minutes (or five times these. levels to the thyroid) at 'the site boundary for existing meteorology b.

These dose rates're projected based on other plant parameters (e.g., radiation level in containment. with leak rate appro-priate for existing containment pressure) or are measured in the environs 10.

Imminent loss of physical control of the plant

12. 3-71 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

11.

Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown a.

Earthquake greater than SSE levels b.

Flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane
surge, seiche greater than design levels or failure of protection of vital equipment at lower levels c.

Winds in excess of design levels 12.

Other hazards being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown a.

Aircraft crash affecting vital structures by impact or fire b.

Severe damage to safe shutdown equipment from missiles or explosion c.

Entry of toxic or flammable gases vital areas 13.

Other plant conditions exist that warrant activation of emergency centers and monitor-ing teams and a precautionary public notifi-cation 14.

Evacuation of control room and control of shutdown systems not established from local stations in 15 minutes 12.3.5.6.3 Exam le General Emer enc Initiatin Events 1.

Small and large LOCA's with failure of ECCS to perform leading to severe core degradation 12.3-72 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

or melt.

Ultimate failure of containment likely for melt sequences.

(Several hours available for response) 2.

Transient initiated by loss of feedwater and condensate systems (principal heat removal system) followed by failure of emergency feed-water system for extended period.

Core melting possible in several hours.

Ultimate failure of containment likely if core melts.

3.

Transient requiring operation of shutdown systems with failure to scram.

Core damage for some designs.

Additional failure of core cooling and makeup systems would lead to core melt.

4.

Failure of offsite and onsite power along with total loss of emergency feedwater makeup capability for several hours would lead to eventual core melt and likely failure of con-tainment.

5..

Small LOCA and initially successful ECCS.

Subsequent failure of containment heat removal systems over several hours could lead to core melt and likely failure of containment.

12 ~ 3 73 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

12.3.5.7 Emergency Classification of FSAR Postulated Transients The FSAR postulated transients are classified into emergency event categories as indicated below.

The transients are bounded by the conditions set forth in Chapter 14 of the FSAR.

Reference to the applic-able FSAR section is indicated by the number in

(

) ~

FSAR Event Descri tion Emergency Classification Example No.

1.

Uncontrolled Rod Withdrawal (subcritical)

(14.1.1).

Unusual Event 13 2.

Uncontrolled Rod Withdrawal (at power)

(14.'1.2)

Unusual Event 14 3.

RCCA Misalignment (14.1. 3) or (14.1. 4)

Unu'sual Event 4.

CVCS Malfunction (14.1.5')

Unusual Event 5.

Loss of Reactor Coolant Flow (14.1.6)

Unusual Event 17 6.

Inactive Loop Startup (14.1.7) 7.

Loss of Load (14.1.8) 8.

Loss of,-Normal Feedwater (14.1.9)

  • Not classified as an Emergency Condition 12.3-74 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

FSAR Event Descri tion 9.

Feedwater System Malfunction (14.1.10) 10.

Excessive Load Xncrease (14.1.11) 11.

Loss of All AC Power to Station (14.1.12) 12.

Turbine Generator Accident (14.1.12) 13.

Fuel Handling Accident (14.2.1) 14.

Accidental Licpxid Release (14.2.2) 15.

Accidental Gaseous Relesae (14.2.3) 16.

S.G.

Tube Rupture (14. 2. 4 )

17.

Steam Line Break (14.2.5) 18.

Control Rod Ejection (14. 2. 6) 19.

Secondary Side Release (14.2.7) 20.

LOCA (14. 3)

Emergency Classification Unusual Event Unusual Event Unusual Event.

Unusual Event Alert Alert Alert Alert Unusual Event Alert Unusual Event Alert Alert Example No.

18 10 13 13 18, 1, 21 3

1 NOTE:

Majority of these examples could be classified more or less severely depending on actual conditions present at the time.

12.3-75 Revision 0

March 1, 1981

Pages 12.3-76 through 12.3-91 have been left blank intentionally.

ATTACHMENT 3 TO AEP:NRC'0308F

INSERT TO APPENDIX A

~ INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C.

COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Ident>

scat>on Number PMP 2080 EPP.001 Title Emergency Plan Activation and Condition Classification evssson No And Date Revision 0

4-1-81 Comments EPP.002 Unusual Evept EP P.003 Alcrt

. EPP.004 Site Emergency EPP.005 General Emergency Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.006 Initial Dose Assessments and

" Revision 0

Verification (Gaseous)

~ 4-1-81 EPP.007 Initial Release Assessments and Verification (Liquid)

Revision 0

. 4-1-81 EPP.008 Calling Off-Duty Plant Personnel EPP.009 Fire Emergency Guidelines EPP.010 Chl orine Gas Release Gu idel ines EPP.Oll Natural Emergency Guidelines EPP.012 Initial Off-Site Notifications EPP.013 Duties of the Individual Who Discovers an Emergency Condition Revision 0

4-1-81

. Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Page 1

Rev.

Date 4-1-81

INDIAN'A 5 MICHIGAN POHER COMPANY DONALD C.

COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index ent1 1 cation Number Title evasion No.

And Date Comments PMP 2081 EPP.001 Emergency Communications EPP.002 Barring of the PBX Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.003 Follow-Up Off-Site Comnunications Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.004 Protective Action Guides Revision 0

(PAGs) and Protective Actions 4-1-81 EPP.005 Personnel Accountability and Revision 0

Site Evacuation 4-1-81 EPP.006 Activation of the Reentry and Rescue Team Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.007 Security Actions During Emergency Conditions Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.008 Emergency Medical Plan Guidelines EPP.009 Health Physics Procedures EPP.010 Activation of Radiation Monitoring Teams EPP.011 On-Site Radiological Monitoring EPP.012 Off-Site Radiological Monitoring EPP.013 Environmental Monitoring and Analysis Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Page 2

Rev.

Date 4-1-81

INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY DONALD C.

COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Ident> >cation Number Title ev>sson No.

And Date Comments PHP 2081 EPP.014 Off-Site Dose Assessments Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.015 Sampling and Analysis of Waterborne Releases EPP.016 Collection and Analysis of Liquid and Gaseous Samples EPP.017 Interpretation of Liquid and Gaseous Samples EPP.018 Transportation Accidents Involving Radioactive Material EPP.019 AEP Emergency

Response

Organization Activation and Management Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0.

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.020 Activation and Operation of Revision 0.

the Technical Support Center 4-1-81 (TSC)

EPP.021 Activation and Operation of the Operations Staging Area (OSA)

Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.022 EPP.023 Activation and Operation of the Recovery Center (RC)

(An Emergency Operations Facility)

Activation and Operation of the Emergency Control Center (ECC)

(An Emergency Operations Facility)

Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.024 Activation and Operation of 'evision 0

the Joint Public Information 4-1-81 Center (JPIC)

(An Emergency Operations Facility)

Page 3

Rev.

Date 4-1-81

~

~

Iki&JANA 5 tlICHIGAN POHF.R COMPANY

~HALD C.

COOK NUCLEAR PLANT PLANT flANAGER PROCEDURE Index

, Identification Number Title Revision No.

And Date Comments PblP 2081 EPP.025 Activation and Operation of the Emergency Hews (ENS)

(An Emergency Source Operations Facility)

EPP.026 Personnel Assignment to Off-Site Centers EPP.027 Off-Site Support and Assistance

'PP.028 Damage Control, Repair and Recovery Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Page 4

Rev.

Date 4-1-81

~,

e'

~

I "I

ANA 5 MICilIGAN PO>lER COMPANY DONALD C.

COOK NUCLFAR PLANT PLANT MANAGER PROCEDURE Index Identification.

Number Title Revision No.

And Date Comments PMP 2082 EPP.001 Emergency Exposure Guidelines Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.002 Public Information Dissemination EPP.003 Maintenance of Emergency Records EPP.004 Emergency Per sonne 1

As s ignments Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.005 Tests, Drills and Exercises Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.006 Training Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.007 Emergency Equipment and Supplies EPP.008 Maps and Forms Revision 0

4-1-81 Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP.009 Maintenance of the Emergency Revision 0

Plan Procedures 4-1-81 EPP Appendix A

Telephone and Call Numbers Revision 0

4-1-81 EPP Appendix 8

Memorial Hospital Plan Revision 0

4-1-81 Page 5

Rev.

Date 4-1-81

'APPENDIX B

The AEP Emergency

Response

Organization Procedures will be incorporated into a single document entitled the AEP Emergency

Response

Manual.

This manual will contain subsections which provide the procedures outlining the job functions and responsibilities of each AEP-ERO manager designated on the organization chart Figure 12.3-4 as well as identification of the specific individuals who fill position in the AEP-ERO by title.,