ML18145A249: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Adam C. Heflin, President, Chief Executive | {{#Wiki_filter:Adam C. Heflin, President, | ||
Officer, and Chief Nuclear Officer UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY | Chief Executive Officer, | ||
COMMISSION | and Chief Nuclear Officer | ||
REGION IV 1600 EAST LAMAR BOULEVARD | UNITED STATES | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
REGION IV | |||
1600 EAST LAMAR BOULEVARD | |||
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511 | ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511 | ||
May 29, 2018 Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating | May 29, 2018 | ||
Corporation | Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation | ||
P.O. Box411 Burlington, KS 66839 SUBJECT: ERRATA FOR WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING | P.O. Box411 | ||
CORPORATION | Burlington, KS 66839 | ||
-NOTIFICATION | SUBJECT: | ||
OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION | ERRATA FOR WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION - | ||
REPORT 05000482/ | NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT | ||
05000482/2018002) AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION | |||
Dear Mr. Heflin: | |||
It was identified that the notification sent to you dated April 25, 2018 (NRC's Agencywide | |||
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18116A613) | |||
improperly listed the inspection report number as 05000482/2018002. The correct inspection | |||
report number is 05000482/2018003. Please note none of the content of the request for | |||
information has changed. The NRC has reissued the notification in its entirety to correct this | |||
error. | |||
This fetter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection | |||
and copying at http:/!www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document | |||
Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for | |||
Withholding." | |||
Docket No. 50-482 | |||
License No. NPF-42 | |||
Enclosure: | |||
Sincerely, | |||
IRA/ | |||
Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief | |||
Operations Branch | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERA TING | |||
CORPORATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION | |||
(NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000482/2018003) | |||
AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION | AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION | ||
cc: Electronic Distribution | |||
ML 18145A249 | |||
~ SUNSI Review | |||
[&] Non-Sensitive | |||
~ Publicly Available | |||
Bv: JCK | |||
CJ Sensitive | |||
CJ Non-Publiclv Available | |||
OFFICE | |||
SOE:OB | |||
C:OB | |||
NAME | |||
JKiridand | |||
VGaddy | |||
SIGNATURE | |||
IRA/ | |||
IRA/ | |||
DATE | |||
05/29/18 | |||
05/29/18 | |||
Adam C. Heflin, President, | |||
Chief Executive Officer, | |||
cc: Electronic | and Chief Nuclear Officer | ||
Distribution | UNITED STATES | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
REGJON IV | |||
1600 EAST LAMAR BOULEVARD | |||
ARLINGTON. TEXAS 76011-4511 | |||
May 29, 2018 | |||
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation | |||
P.O. Box411 | |||
Burlington, KS 66839 | |||
SUBJECT: | |||
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION - NOTIFICATION OF | |||
INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000482/2018003) AND | |||
Bv: JCK CJ Sensitive | REQUEST FOR INFORMATION | ||
CJ Non-Publiclv | Dear Mr. Heflin: | ||
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | |||
C:OB NAME JKiridand | staff will conduct a biennial requalification inspection at the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating | ||
VGaddy SIGNATURE | Corporation from June 4 - 7, 2018. The inspection will consist of two reactor inspectors from | ||
IRA/ IRA/ DATE 05/29/18 05/29/18 | the NRC's Region IV office for one week. The inspection will be conducted in accordance with | ||
Adam C. Heflin, President, Chief Executive | the NRC Inspection Procedure {IP) 71111.11 B, "Licensed Operator Requalification Program." | ||
Officer, and Chief Nuclear Officer UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY | Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive inspection both for the NRC | ||
COMMISSION | inspectors and your staff. In order to minimize the impact to your on-site resources and to | ||
REGJON IV 1600 EAST LAMAR BOULEVARD | ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this | ||
ARLINGTON. | inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups. The first group (Section A | ||
TEXAS 76011-4511 | of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the inspection to ensure that the | ||
May 29, 2018 Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating | inspectors are adequately prepared. The second group (Section B of the enclosure) identifies | ||
Corporation | the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The third group {Section C of | ||
P.O. Box411 Burlington, KS 66839 SUBJECT: WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING | this enclosure) identifies the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are | ||
CORPORATION | usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important that all of these | ||
-NOTIFICATION | documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional | ||
documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection. | |||
REPORT 05000482/2018003) | We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand | ||
that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. Lucille Stone. Our inspection dates are | |||
Dear Mr. Heflin: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | subject to change based on your updated schedule of examination activities. If there are any | ||
Commission (NRC) staff will conduct a biennial requalification | questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector, | ||
inspection | John Kirkland, at (817) 200-1771 (John.Kirkland@nrc.gov). | ||
at the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating | This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject | ||
Corporation | To the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information | ||
from June 4 -7, 2018. The inspection | collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control | ||
will consist of two reactor inspectors | number 3150-0018. | ||
will be conducted | A. Heflin | ||
in accordance | 2 | ||
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for | |||
Procedure | information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a | ||
{IP) 71111.11 B, "Licensed | currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number. | ||
Operator Requalification | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter | ||
Program." Experience | and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public | ||
has shown that this inspection | Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document | ||
is a resource intensive | system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- | ||
inspection | rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
both for the NRC inspectors | Docket No. 50-482 | ||
and your staff. In order to minimize the impact to your on-site resources | License No. NPF-42 | ||
and to ensure a productive | Enclosure: | ||
inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents | |||
needed for this inspection. | |||
These documents | |||
have been divided into three groups. The first group (Section A of the enclosure) | |||
identifies | |||
information | |||
to be provided prior to the inspection | |||
to ensure that the inspectors | |||
are adequately | |||
prepared. | |||
The second group (Section B of the enclosure) | |||
identifies | |||
the information | |||
the inspectors | |||
will need upon arrival at the site. The third group {Section C of this enclosure) | |||
identifies | |||
the items which are necessary | |||
to close out the inspection | |||
and are usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important | |||
that all of these documents | |||
are up-to-date | |||
and complete in order to minimize the number of additional | |||
documents | |||
requested | |||
during the preparation | |||
and/or the on-site portions of the inspection. | |||
We have discussed | |||
the schedule for these inspection | |||
activities | |||
with your staff and understand | |||
that our regulatory | |||
contact for this inspection | |||
will be Ms. Lucille Stone. Our inspection | |||
dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of examination | |||
activities. | |||
If there are any questions | |||
about this inspection | |||
or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector , John Kirkland, at (817) 200-1771 (John.Kirkland@nrc.gov | |||
). This letter does not contain new or amended information | |||
collection | |||
requirements | |||
Reduction | |||
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information | |||
collection | |||
requirements | |||
were approved by the Office of Management | |||
and Budget, control number 3150-0018. | |||
A. Heflin 2 The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information | |||
or an information | |||
collection | |||
requirement | |||
unless the requesting | |||
document displays a currently | |||
valid Office of Management | |||
and Budget control number. In accordance | |||
with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure | |||
will be available | |||
electronically | |||
for public inspection | |||
in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available | |||
Records (PARS) component | |||
of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible | |||
from the NRC web site at | |||
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic | |||
Reading Room). Docket No. 50-482 License No. NPF-42 Enclosure: | |||
Request for Information | Request for Information | ||
cc: Electronic | cc: Electronic Distribution | ||
Distribution | Sincerely, | ||
Sincerely, IRA! Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief Operations | IRA! | ||
Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief | |||
Inspection | Operations Branch | ||
Report: Inspection | Division of Reactor Safety | ||
Dates: Initial Request for Information | |||
Biennial Requalification | Inspection Report: | ||
Inspection | Inspection Dates: | ||
Wolf Creek Generating | Initial Request for Information | ||
Biennial Requalification Inspection | |||
June 4-7, 2018 Inspection | Wolf Creek Generating Station | ||
Procedure: | 05000482/2018003 | ||
IP 71111.11 B, "Licensed | June 4- 7, 2018 | ||
Operator Requalification | Inspection Procedure: | ||
Program" Lead Inspector: | IP 71111.11 B, "Licensed Operator Requalification | ||
John Kirkland, Senior Operations | Program" | ||
Lead Inspector: | |||
information | John Kirkland, Senior Operations Engineer | ||
is requested | A. The following information is requested In order to support inspection preparation | ||
In order to support inspection | activities. These items are fisted by section as they appear in the inspection | ||
preparation | module (ie 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested materf als should be sent either electronically | ||
activities. | or CD/DVD ( do not send USB drives) in order to arrive at the Region IV office no | ||
These items are fisted by section as they appear in the inspection | later than May 14, 2018. | ||
module (ie 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested | * | ||
materf als should be sent either electronically | Electronically: To: John.Kirkland@nrc.gov | ||
or CD/DVD ( do not send USB drives) in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than May 14, 2018. * Electronically: | |||
To: John.Kirkland@nrc.gov | |||
cc: Clyde.Osterholtz@nrc.gov | cc: Clyde.Osterholtz@nrc.gov | ||
* CD/DVD to: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | * | ||
Commission | CD/DVD to: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
Region IV General Bequests: | Region IV | ||
ATTN: John Kirkland 1600 E. Lamar Blvd Arlington, TX 76011 * List of licensed operators (SRO and RO) by crew (operating | General Bequests: | ||
and staff) * Training and Operations | ATTN: John Kirkland | ||
Department | 1600 E. Lamar Blvd | ||
organization | Arlington, TX 76011 | ||
charts (with qualified | * | ||
List of licensed operators (SRO and RO) by crew (operating and staff) | |||
identified) | * | ||
* Procedures | Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR | ||
that identify process for revising and maintaining | evaluators identified) | ||
LO continuing | * | ||
Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training | |||
* List of outstanding | program up-to-date | ||
LOR program changes * List of plant events and industry operating | * | ||
experience | List of outstanding LOR program changes | ||
incorporated | * | ||
into LOR program since last BRQ * Audits and/or self-assessment | List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR | ||
reports addressing | program since last BRQ | ||
the licensed operator requalification | * | ||
training program * Last 2-years of simulator | Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator | ||
review committee (or equivalent) | requalification training program | ||
meeting minutes Enclosure | * | ||
* Last 2-years of CRC (or equivalent) | Last 2-years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes | ||
meeting minutes 2.3 Biennial Regualification | Enclosure | ||
Written Examination | |||
Qual!h'. * The current and approved biennial written examination | * | ||
Last 2-years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes | |||
cycle written examination | 2.3 | ||
results for both SRO and RO that have already been administered | Biennial Regualification Written Examination Qual!h'. | ||
up to the week prior to the inspection | * | ||
The current and approved biennial written examination schedule | |||
examinations | * | ||
that have been approved for administration | The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO and RO | ||
up to and including | that have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team | ||
the week before the inspection | arrival on-site | ||
team is on-site. This will need to have adequate password protection | * | ||
if e-mailed or double envelope protection | All.written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and | ||
if mailed via regular mail per NUREG-1021. | including the week before the inspection team is on-site. This will need to have | ||
* The current requalification | adequate password protection if e-mailed or double envelope protection if mailed via | ||
cycle examination | regular mail per NUREG-1021. | ||
methodology (sample plan} 2.4 Annual Regualification | * | ||
Operating | The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan} | ||
Test Quality 2.5 2.6 * The schedule for the operating | 2.4 | ||
tests (JPMs and scenarios) | Annual Regualification Operating Test Quality | ||
to be given the week of June 4, 2018 * The operating | 2.5 | ||
tests (JPMs and scenarios) (password | 2.6 | ||
protected | * | ||
and provide separately | The schedule for the operating tests (JPMs and scenarios) to be given the week of | ||
via telephone | June 4, 2018 | ||
at later date) to be given the week of June 4, 2018 * Current requalification | * | ||
cycle operating | The operating tests (JPMs and scenarios) (password protected and provide | ||
tests (SRO and RO) and results up to the week prior to the inspection | separately via telephone at later date) to be given the week of June 4, 2018 | ||
team arrival on-site (NIA if the inspection | * | ||
week is the first week of testing) * All.of the previous year's NRC required annual operating | Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO and RO) and results up to the | ||
week prior to the inspection team arrival on-site (NIA if the inspection week is the | |||
cycle operating | first week of testing) | ||
test methodology (sample plan) * All portions of the updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) that identify operator response times for time critical operator actions Licensee Admin of Requalification | * | ||
All.of the previous year's NRC required annual operating tests | |||
used to administer | * | ||
the annual operating | Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan) | ||
* | |||
used to assess operator perfomiance | All portions of the updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) that identify | ||
* All procedures | operator response times for time critical operator actions | ||
that describe conduct of simulator | Licensee Admin of Requalification Exams | ||
* | |||
used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator | All procedures used to administer the annual operating test | ||
Regualification | * | ||
Examination | All procedures used to assess operator perfomiance | ||
Secur~ * Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive | * | ||
overlap on the written examinations | All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training | ||
and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a periodic basis * Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive | * | ||
overlap on 2 | All procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator | ||
the operating | Regualification Examination Secur~ | ||
tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions (including | * | ||
major events, instrument/component | Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on | ||
malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a periodic basis * All procedures | the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a | ||
that describe examination | periodic basis | ||
security, including | * | ||
procedures | Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on | ||
used to develop the examinations | 2 | ||
that include guidelines | |||
on overlap between examinations | the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions | ||
(including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a | |||
periodic basis | |||
* | |||
All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to | |||
develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations | |||
in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations | in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations | ||
* List of all condition | * | ||
reports since the last biennial requalification | List of all condition reports since the last biennial requalification inspection related to | ||
inspection | examination security and overlap | ||
related to examination | 2.7 | ||
security and overlap 2.7 Licensee Remedial Training Program 2.8 2.9 * List of remedial training conducted | Licensee Remedial Training Program | ||
or planned since last requalification | 2.8 | ||
2.9 | |||
training provided to operators | * | ||
to enable passing requalification | List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requalification exams | ||
exams and training provided to correct generic or individual | (includes training provided to operators to enable passing requalification exams and | ||
weaknesses | training provided to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during | ||
observed during previous requalification | previous requalification exam cycle) | ||
exam cycle) * Remediation | * | ||
plans (lesson plans, reference | Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance | ||
materials, and attendance | |||
documentation) | documentation) | ||
Conformance | Conformance with Operator License Conditions | ||
with Operator License Conditions | * | ||
* All procedures | All procedures and program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses, | ||
and program documentation | tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators | ||
for maintaining | * | ||
active operator licenses, tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators | All procedures and associated documentation that supports reactivation of any | ||
* All procedures | SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection | ||
and associated | Simulator Performance | ||
documentation | * | ||
that supports reactivation | For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be | ||
of any SRO/RO license (operating | electronic or in paper single test packages, and shall be complete with test | ||
or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection | procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient | ||
Simulator | test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert | ||
Performance | review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the | ||
* For the following | ANSI 3.5 standard requirements. | ||
cases, send the most recent transient | o Transient test 1, manual reactor trip | ||
test packages, which may be electronic | o Transient test 5, trip of any single reactor coolant pump | ||
or in paper single test packages, and shall be complete with test procedures | o Transient test 8, maximum size RCS rupture combined with loss of all offsite | ||
for each test, the acceptance | power | ||
criteria, and results. For each transient | o Steady state tests for low power | ||
test, the reference chart | * | ||
should be included or an equivalent | SBT Packages for any three scenarios used for the 2017 Annual Requalification | ||
subject matter expert review versus the simulator | Operating Test | ||
results with a write-up for any differences | 3 | ||
beyond the ANSI 3.5 standard requirements. | |||
o Transient | * | ||
test 1 , manual reactor trip o Transient | All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for | ||
test 5, trip of any single reactor coolant pump o Transient | Section 02.05 above | ||
test 8, maximum size RCS rupture combined with loss of all offsite power o Steady state tests for low power * SBT Packages for any three scenarios | * | ||
used for the 2017 Annual Requalification | Simulator Discrepancy Report (DR) summacx list for all open DRs. For closed DRs, | ||
Operating | summary list for those items closed between June 2016 to May 2018 | ||
* | |||
* All Simulator | Malfunction tests for loss of condenser vacuum and reactor pressure control system | ||
Management | failure. If these are included in an SBT package then the review of that package | ||
and Configuration | would be acceptable | ||
Procedures | * | ||
if not already provided for Section 02.05 above * Simulator | Two examples of primary parameters tested in order to verify core physics | ||
Discrepancy | parameters. The applicable reference grf}phs from the plant physics data book | ||
Report (DR) summacx list for all open DRs. For closed DRs, summary list for those items closed between June 2016 to May 2018 * Malfunction | (electronic or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test | ||
tests for loss of condenser | procedures used and the acceptance criteria with results. | ||
vacuum and reactor pressure control system failure. If these are included in an SBT package then the review of that package would be acceptable | * | ||
* Two examples of primary parameters | All simulator modification packages that are on hold, delayed, or just not completed | ||
tested in order to verify core physics parameters. | in the last 2-years | ||
The applicable | * | ||
reference | A list of simulator modification packages completed in the last 2-year window | ||
grf}phs from the plant physics data book (electronic | 2.10 | ||
or other means as available) | Problem Identification and Resolution | ||
should also be included as well as the test procedures | * | ||
used and the acceptance | A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the | ||
criteria with results. * All simulator | control room | ||
modification | * | ||
packages that are on hold, delayed, or just not completed | Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance | ||
in the last 2-years * A list of simulator | issues | ||
modification | B. The following information is requested in order to support the on-site inspection | ||
packages completed | activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either | ||
in the last 2-year window 2.10 Problem Identification | electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on June 4, 2018. | ||
and Resolution * A summary report of all condition | 2.2 | ||
reports related to operator actions/errors | 2.8 | ||
in the control room * Any revised requalification | 2.9 | ||
training that was based on licensed operator performance | Exam Results / 02.03 and 02.04: Written Exam and Op Test Qualit'l | ||
issues B. The following | * | ||
information | All Operating tests (JPMs and scenarios) to be given in all subsequent weeks after | ||
is requested | on-site week | ||
in order to support the on-site inspection | * | ||
activities. | All results up to the day the team leaves the site | ||
Requested | Conformance with Operator License Conditions | ||
materials | * | ||
should be available | Access to licensed operators' records ( operating and staff crews) | ||
to the inspection | * | ||
team, either electronically | Access to licensed operators' training attendance records | ||
or hardcopy, upon site arrival on June 4, 2018. 2.2 2.8 2.9 Exam Results / 02.03 and 02.04: Written Exam and Op Test Qualit'l * All Operating | * | ||
tests (JPMs and scenarios) | Access to licensed operators' medical records | ||
to be given in all subsequent | Simulator Performance | ||
weeks after on-site week * All results up to the day the team leaves the site Conformance | * | ||
with Operator License Conditions | Simulator discrepancy reports (DRs) from June 2016 to May 2018. This should | ||
* Access to licensed operators' | include all open DR's and DR's that have been closed, including the | ||
records ( operating | documentation/justification for closure. | ||
and staff crews) * Access to licensed operators' | 4 | ||
training attendance | |||
* | |||
medical records Simulator | Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at | ||
Performance | the time of acceptance (as available) | ||
* Simulator | * | ||
discrepancy | Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal*hydraulics and | ||
reports (DRs) from June 2016 to May 2018. This should include all open DR's and DR's that have been closed, including | neutronics models, to the actual plant | ||
* All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs. Design differences in the | |||
for closure. 4 | simulator (any documentation on this) | ||
* Acceptance | * | ||
test documentation, including | Summary list of modifications from June 2016 to May 2018 | ||
hardware and software model revisions | * | ||
Plant modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the simulator by due | |||
* Documentation | date from June 2016 to May 2018 | ||
that validates | * | ||
current models, including | Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to June 4, 2018) | ||
the thermal*hydraulics | * | ||
The complete book of all simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a | |||
models, to the actual plant * All current model deficiencies, including | single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all | ||
FSAR vs. Design differences | transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include | ||
in the simulator (any documentation | the test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each | ||
on this) * Summary list of modifications | transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter | ||
from June 2016 to May 2018 * Plant modifications (both hardware and software) | expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond | ||
completed | the ANSI standard requirements. | ||
on the simulator | * | ||
by due date from June 2016 to May 2018 * Simulator | All test packages used to verify core physics parameters. The applicable reference | ||
Differences | graphs from the plant physics data book ( electronic or other means as available) | ||
Lesson plan used in training (current to June 4, 2018) * The complete book of all simulator | should also be included as well as the test procedures used and the acceptance | ||
annual performance | criteria with results. | ||
test packages (usually in a single book, but may be electronic | * | ||
or in single test packages), complete with all transient | All simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the | ||
tests, steady state tests, and malfunction | room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages, | ||
tests. This should also include the test procedures | simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc. | ||
for each test, the acceptance | * | ||
criteria, and results. For each transient | Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for simulator testing | ||
test, the reference | 2.10 | ||
chart should be included or an equivalent | Problem Identification and Resolution | ||
subject matter expert review versus the simulator | * All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room | ||
results with a write-up for any differences | C. Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation is required to send the final results | ||
summary, and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been | |||
* All test packages used to verify core physics parameters. | reviewed to the Regional office lead inspector for this inspection for final review | ||
The applicable | and comparison against the significance determination tools in order to | ||
reference | communicate the exit results for the inspection. | ||
graphs from the plant physics data book ( electronic | |||
or other means as available) | |||
should also be included as well as the test procedures | |||
used and the acceptance | |||
criteria with results. * All simulator | |||
test, configuration | |||
management, and related documents | |||
available | |||
in the room for inspectors | |||
to review. This includes training needs analysis packages, simulator | |||
review committee | |||
meeting minutes, etc. * Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed | |||
to for simulator | |||
and Resolution | |||
* All condition | |||
reports related to operator actions/errors | |||
in the control room C. Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating | |||
Corporation | |||
is required to send the final results summary, and any remaining | |||
exams and operating | |||
tests that have not been reviewed to the Regional office lead inspector | |||
for this inspection | |||
for final review and comparison | |||
against the significance | |||
determination | |||
tools in order to communicate | |||
the exit results for the inspection. | |||
5 | 5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:29, 5 January 2025
| ML18145A249 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek |
| Issue date: | 05/29/2018 |
| From: | Vincent Gaddy Operations Branch IV |
| To: | Heflin A Wolf Creek |
| References | |
| IR 2018002 | |
| Download: ML18145A249 (9) | |
See also: IR 05000482/2018002
Text
Adam C. Heflin, President,
Chief Executive Officer,
and Chief Nuclear Officer
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
1600 EAST LAMAR BOULEVARD
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511
May 29, 2018
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation
P.O. Box411
Burlington, KS 66839
SUBJECT:
ERRATA FOR WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION -
NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT
05000482/2018002) AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Heflin:
It was identified that the notification sent to you dated April 25, 2018 (NRC's Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18116A613)
improperly listed the inspection report number as 05000482/2018002. The correct inspection
report number is 05000482/2018003. Please note none of the content of the request for
information has changed. The NRC has reissued the notification in its entirety to correct this
error.
This fetter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection
and copying at http:/!www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document
Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for
Withholding."
Docket No. 50-482
License No. NPF-42
Enclosure:
Sincerely,
IRA/
Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief
Operations Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERA TING
CORPORATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION
(NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000482/2018003)
AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
cc: Electronic Distribution
~ SUNSI Review
[&] Non-Sensitive
~ Publicly Available
Bv: JCK
CJ Sensitive
CJ Non-Publiclv Available
OFFICE
SOE:OB
C:OB
NAME
JKiridand
VGaddy
SIGNATURE
IRA/
IRA/
DATE
05/29/18
05/29/18
Adam C. Heflin, President,
Chief Executive Officer,
and Chief Nuclear Officer
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGJON IV
1600 EAST LAMAR BOULEVARD
ARLINGTON. TEXAS 76011-4511
May 29, 2018
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation
P.O. Box411
Burlington, KS 66839
SUBJECT:
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION - NOTIFICATION OF
INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000482/2018003) AND
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Heflin:
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
staff will conduct a biennial requalification inspection at the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating
Corporation from June 4 - 7, 2018. The inspection will consist of two reactor inspectors from
the NRC's Region IV office for one week. The inspection will be conducted in accordance with
the NRC Inspection Procedure {IP) 71111.11 B, "Licensed Operator Requalification Program."
Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive inspection both for the NRC
inspectors and your staff. In order to minimize the impact to your on-site resources and to
ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this
inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups. The first group (Section A
of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the inspection to ensure that the
inspectors are adequately prepared. The second group (Section B of the enclosure) identifies
the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The third group {Section C of
this enclosure) identifies the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are
usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important that all of these
documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional
documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection.
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand
that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. Lucille Stone. Our inspection dates are
subject to change based on your updated schedule of examination activities. If there are any
questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector,
John Kirkland, at (817) 200-1771 (John.Kirkland@nrc.gov).
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
To the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control
number 3150-0018.
A. Heflin
2
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for
information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter
and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public
Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document
system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Docket No. 50-482
License No. NPF-42
Enclosure:
Request for Information
cc: Electronic Distribution
Sincerely,
IRA!
Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief
Operations Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
Inspection Report:
Inspection Dates:
Initial Request for Information
Biennial Requalification Inspection
Wolf Creek Generating Station
June 4- 7, 2018
Inspection Procedure:
IP 71111.11 B, "Licensed Operator Requalification
Program"
Lead Inspector:
John Kirkland, Senior Operations Engineer
A. The following information is requested In order to support inspection preparation
activities. These items are fisted by section as they appear in the inspection
module (ie 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested materf als should be sent either electronically
or CD/DVD ( do not send USB drives) in order to arrive at the Region IV office no
later than May 14, 2018.
Electronically: To: John.Kirkland@nrc.gov
cc: Clyde.Osterholtz@nrc.gov
CD/DVD to: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Region IV
General Bequests:
ATTN: John Kirkland
1600 E. Lamar Blvd
Arlington, TX 76011
List of licensed operators (SRO and RO) by crew (operating and staff)
Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR
evaluators identified)
Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training
program up-to-date
List of outstanding LOR program changes
List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR
program since last BRQ
Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator
requalification training program
Last 2-years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes
Enclosure
Last 2-years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes
2.3
Biennial Regualification Written Examination Qual!h'.
The current and approved biennial written examination schedule
The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO and RO
that have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team
arrival on-site
All.written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and
including the week before the inspection team is on-site. This will need to have
adequate password protection if e-mailed or double envelope protection if mailed via
regular mail per NUREG-1021.
The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan}
2.4
Annual Regualification Operating Test Quality
2.5
2.6
The schedule for the operating tests (JPMs and scenarios) to be given the week of
June 4, 2018
The operating tests (JPMs and scenarios) (password protected and provide
separately via telephone at later date) to be given the week of June 4, 2018
Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO and RO) and results up to the
week prior to the inspection team arrival on-site (NIA if the inspection week is the
first week of testing)
All.of the previous year's NRC required annual operating tests
Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)
All portions of the updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) that identify
operator response times for time critical operator actions
Licensee Admin of Requalification Exams
All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
All procedures used to assess operator perfomiance
All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
All procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator
Regualification Examination Secur~
Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on
the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a
periodic basis
Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on
2
the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions
(including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a
periodic basis
All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to
develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations
in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations
List of all condition reports since the last biennial requalification inspection related to
examination security and overlap
2.7
Licensee Remedial Training Program
2.8
2.9
List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requalification exams
(includes training provided to operators to enable passing requalification exams and
training provided to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during
previous requalification exam cycle)
Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance
documentation)
Conformance with Operator License Conditions
All procedures and program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses,
tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators
All procedures and associated documentation that supports reactivation of any
SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection
Simulator Performance
For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be
electronic or in paper single test packages, and shall be complete with test
procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient
test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert
review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the
ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.
o Transient test 1, manual reactor trip
o Transient test 5, trip of any single reactor coolant pump
o Transient test 8, maximum size RCS rupture combined with loss of all offsite
power
o Steady state tests for low power
SBT Packages for any three scenarios used for the 2017 Annual Requalification
Operating Test
3
All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for
Section 02.05 above
Simulator Discrepancy Report (DR) summacx list for all open DRs. For closed DRs,
summary list for those items closed between June 2016 to May 2018
Malfunction tests for loss of condenser vacuum and reactor pressure control system
failure. If these are included in an SBT package then the review of that package
would be acceptable
Two examples of primary parameters tested in order to verify core physics
parameters. The applicable reference grf}phs from the plant physics data book
(electronic or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test
procedures used and the acceptance criteria with results.
All simulator modification packages that are on hold, delayed, or just not completed
in the last 2-years
A list of simulator modification packages completed in the last 2-year window
2.10
Problem Identification and Resolution
A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the
control room
Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance
issues
B. The following information is requested in order to support the on-site inspection
activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either
electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on June 4, 2018.
2.2
2.8
2.9
Exam Results / 02.03 and 02.04: Written Exam and Op Test Qualit'l
All Operating tests (JPMs and scenarios) to be given in all subsequent weeks after
on-site week
All results up to the day the team leaves the site
Conformance with Operator License Conditions
Access to licensed operators' records ( operating and staff crews)
Access to licensed operators' training attendance records
Access to licensed operators' medical records
Simulator Performance
Simulator discrepancy reports (DRs) from June 2016 to May 2018. This should
include all open DR's and DR's that have been closed, including the
documentation/justification for closure.
4
Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at
the time of acceptance (as available)
Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal*hydraulics and
neutronics models, to the actual plant
- All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs. Design differences in the
simulator (any documentation on this)
Summary list of modifications from June 2016 to May 2018
Plant modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the simulator by due
date from June 2016 to May 2018
Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to June 4, 2018)
The complete book of all simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a
single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all
transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include
the test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each
transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter
expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond
the ANSI standard requirements.
All test packages used to verify core physics parameters. The applicable reference
graphs from the plant physics data book ( electronic or other means as available)
should also be included as well as the test procedures used and the acceptance
criteria with results.
All simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the
room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages,
simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.
Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for simulator testing
2.10
Problem Identification and Resolution
- All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room
C. Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation is required to send the final results
summary, and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been
reviewed to the Regional office lead inspector for this inspection for final review
and comparison against the significance determination tools in order to
communicate the exit results for the inspection.
5