ML18145A249: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Adam C. Heflin, President, Chief Executive  
{{#Wiki_filter:Adam C. Heflin, President,  
Officer, and Chief Nuclear Officer UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY  
Chief Executive Officer,  
COMMISSION  
and Chief Nuclear Officer  
REGION IV 1600 EAST LAMAR BOULEVARD  
UNITED STATES  
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
REGION IV  
1600 EAST LAMAR BOULEVARD  
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511  
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511  
May 29, 2018 Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating  
May 29, 2018  
Corporation  
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation  
P.O. Box411 Burlington, KS 66839 SUBJECT: ERRATA FOR WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING  
P.O. Box411  
CORPORATION  
Burlington, KS 66839  
-NOTIFICATION  
SUBJECT:  
OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION  
ERRATA FOR WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION -
REPORT 05000482/2018002)  
NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT
05000482/2018002) AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Heflin:
It was identified that the notification sent to you dated April 25, 2018 (NRC's Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18116A613)
improperly listed the inspection report number as 05000482/2018002. The correct inspection
report number is 05000482/2018003. Please note none of the content of the request for
information has changed. The NRC has reissued the notification in its entirety to correct this
error.
This fetter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection
and copying at http:/!www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document
Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for
Withholding."
Docket No. 50-482
License No. NPF-42
Enclosure:
Sincerely,
IRA/
Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief
Operations Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERA TING
CORPORATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION  
(NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000482/2018003)  
AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION  
AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION  
Dear Mr. Heflin: It was identified
cc: Electronic Distribution  
that the notification
 
sent to you dated April 25, 2018 (NRC's Agencywide
 
Documents
ML 18145A249  
Access and Management
~ SUNSI Review  
System (ADAMS) Accession
[&] Non-Sensitive  
No. ML18116A613)
~ Publicly Available  
improperly
Bv: JCK  
listed the inspection
CJ Sensitive  
report number as 05000482/2018002.
CJ Non-Publiclv Available
The correct inspection
OFFICE  
report number is 05000482/2018003.
SOE:OB  
Please note none of the content of the request for information has changed.
C:OB  
The NRC has reissued the notification
NAME  
in its entirety to correct this error. This fetter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available
JKiridand  
for public inspection
VGaddy  
and copying at http:/!www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
SIGNATURE  
and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance
IRA/  
with 10 CFR 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding." Docket No. 50-482 License No. NPF-42 Enclosure:
IRA/  
Sincerely, IRA/ Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief Operations
DATE  
Branch Division of Reactor Safety WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERA TING CORPORATION
05/29/18  
-NOTIFICATION
05/29/18  
OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION
 
REPORT 05000482/2018003)
Adam C. Heflin, President,  
AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Chief Executive Officer,  
cc: Electronic  
and Chief Nuclear Officer  
Distribution
UNITED STATES  
A. Heflin 2 ERRATA FOR WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
CORPORATION
REGJON IV  
-NOTIFICATION
1600 EAST LAMAR BOULEVARD  
OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION
ARLINGTON. TEXAS 76011-4511  
REPORT 05000482/2018002)
May 29, 2018  
AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION-
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation  
DATED MAY 29, 2018 DISTRIBUTION:
P.O. Box411  
KKennedy, ORA SMorris, ORA TVegel, DRP Rlantz, DRP MShaffer, DRS JClark, DRS DDodson, DRP FThomas, DRP NTaylor, DRP DProulx, DRP JMelfi,DRP
Burlington, KS 66839  
ECombs, DRP SGalemore, DRP VDricks, ORA BSingal, NRR GGeorge, DRS EUribe, DRS MHerrera, DRMA R4Enforcement
SUBJECT:  
SKirkwood, OGC JWeil, OWFN AMoreno, OWFN JBowen, OEDO BMaier, ORA ADAMS ACCESSION
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION - NOTIFICATION OF
NUMBER: ML 18145A249 SUNSI Review [&] Non-Sensitive Publicly Available  
INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000482/2018003) AND
Bv: JCK CJ Sensitive  
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION  
CJ Non-Publiclv  
Dear Mr. Heflin:  
Available OFFICE SOE:OB  
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)  
C:OB NAME JKiridand  
staff will conduct a biennial requalification inspection at the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating  
VGaddy SIGNATURE  
Corporation from June 4 - 7, 2018. The inspection will consist of two reactor inspectors from
IRA/ IRA/ DATE 05/29/18 05/29/18 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Keyword: NRC-002 
the NRC's Region IV office for one week. The inspection will be conducted in accordance with
Adam C. Heflin, President, Chief Executive  
the NRC Inspection Procedure {IP) 71111.11 B, "Licensed Operator Requalification Program."  
Officer, and Chief Nuclear Officer UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY  
Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive inspection both for the NRC  
COMMISSION  
inspectors and your staff. In order to minimize the impact to your on-site resources and to  
REGJON IV 1600 EAST LAMAR BOULEVARD  
ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this  
ARLINGTON.  
inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups. The first group (Section A  
TEXAS 76011-4511  
of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the inspection to ensure that the  
May 29, 2018 Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating  
inspectors are adequately prepared. The second group (Section B of the enclosure) identifies  
Corporation  
the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The third group {Section C of  
P.O. Box411 Burlington, KS 66839 SUBJECT: WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING  
this enclosure) identifies the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are  
CORPORATION  
usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important that all of these  
-NOTIFICATION  
documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional  
OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION  
documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection.  
REPORT 05000482/2018003)  
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand  
AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION  
that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. Lucille Stone. Our inspection dates are  
Dear Mr. Heflin: The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  
subject to change based on your updated schedule of examination activities. If there are any  
Commission (NRC) staff will conduct a biennial requalification  
questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector,  
inspection  
John Kirkland, at (817) 200-1771 (John.Kirkland@nrc.gov).  
at the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating  
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
Corporation  
To the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information  
from June 4 -7, 2018. The inspection  
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control  
will consist of two reactor inspectors  
number 3150-0018.  
from the NRC's Region IV office for one week. The inspection  
 
will be conducted  
A. Heflin  
in accordance  
2  
with the NRC Inspection  
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for  
Procedure  
information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a  
{IP) 71111.11 B, "Licensed  
currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.  
Operator Requalification  
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter  
Program." Experience  
and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public  
has shown that this inspection  
Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document  
is a resource intensive  
system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
inspection  
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
both for the NRC inspectors  
Docket No. 50-482  
and your staff. In order to minimize the impact to your on-site resources  
License No. NPF-42  
and to ensure a productive  
Enclosure:  
inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents  
needed for this inspection.  
These documents  
have been divided into three groups. The first group (Section A of the enclosure)  
identifies  
information  
to be provided prior to the inspection  
to ensure that the inspectors  
are adequately  
prepared.  
The second group (Section B of the enclosure)  
identifies  
the information  
the inspectors  
will need upon arrival at the site. The third group {Section C of this enclosure)  
identifies  
the items which are necessary  
to close out the inspection  
and are usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important  
that all of these documents  
are up-to-date  
and complete in order to minimize the number of additional  
documents  
requested  
during the preparation  
and/or the on-site portions of the inspection.  
We have discussed  
the schedule for these inspection  
activities  
with your staff and understand  
that our regulatory  
contact for this inspection  
will be Ms. Lucille Stone. Our inspection  
dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of examination  
activities.  
If there are any questions  
about this inspection  
or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector , John Kirkland, at (817) 200-1771 (John.Kirkland@nrc.gov
). This letter does not contain new or amended information  
collection  
requirements  
subject To the Paperwork  
Reduction  
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information  
collection  
requirements  
were approved by the Office of Management  
and Budget, control number 3150-0018.
A. Heflin 2 The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information  
or an information  
collection  
requirement  
unless the requesting  
document displays a currently  
valid Office of Management  
and Budget control number. In accordance  
with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure  
will be available  
electronically  
for public inspection  
in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available  
Records (PARS) component  
of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible  
from the NRC web site at  
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic  
Reading Room). Docket No. 50-482 License No. NPF-42 Enclosure:  
Request for Information  
Request for Information  
cc: Electronic  
cc: Electronic Distribution  
Distribution  
Sincerely,  
Sincerely, IRA! Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief Operations  
IRA!  
Branch Division of Reactor Safety
Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief  
Inspection  
Operations Branch
Report: Inspection  
Division of Reactor Safety  
Dates: Initial Request for Information  
 
Biennial Requalification  
Inspection Report:  
Inspection  
Inspection Dates:  
Wolf Creek Generating  
Initial Request for Information  
Station 05000482/2018003  
Biennial Requalification Inspection  
June 4-7, 2018 Inspection  
Wolf Creek Generating Station
Procedure:  
05000482/2018003  
IP 71111.11 B, "Licensed  
June 4- 7, 2018  
Operator Requalification  
Inspection Procedure:  
Program" Lead Inspector:  
IP 71111.11 B, "Licensed Operator Requalification  
John Kirkland, Senior Operations  
Program"  
Engineer A. The following  
Lead Inspector:  
information  
John Kirkland, Senior Operations Engineer
is requested  
A. The following information is requested In order to support inspection preparation  
In order to support inspection  
activities. These items are fisted by section as they appear in the inspection  
preparation  
module (ie 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested materf als should be sent either electronically  
activities.  
or CD/DVD ( do not send USB drives) in order to arrive at the Region IV office no  
These items are fisted by section as they appear in the inspection  
later than May 14, 2018.  
module (ie 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested  
*  
materf als should be sent either electronically  
Electronically: To: John.Kirkland@nrc.gov  
or CD/DVD ( do not send USB drives) in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than May 14, 2018. * Electronically:  
To: John.Kirkland@nrc.gov  
cc: Clyde.Osterholtz@nrc.gov  
cc: Clyde.Osterholtz@nrc.gov  
* CD/DVD to: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  
*  
Commission  
CD/DVD to: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  
Region IV General Bequests:  
Region IV  
ATTN: John Kirkland 1600 E. Lamar Blvd Arlington, TX 76011 * List of licensed operators (SRO and RO) by crew (operating  
General Bequests:  
and staff) * Training and Operations  
ATTN: John Kirkland  
Department  
1600 E. Lamar Blvd  
organization  
Arlington, TX 76011  
charts (with qualified  
*  
LOR evaluators  
List of licensed operators (SRO and RO) by crew (operating and staff)  
identified)  
*  
* Procedures  
Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR
that identify process for revising and maintaining  
evaluators identified)  
LO continuing  
*  
training program up-to-date  
Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training
* List of outstanding  
program up-to-date  
LOR program changes * List of plant events and industry operating  
*  
experience  
List of outstanding LOR program changes  
incorporated  
*  
into LOR program since last BRQ * Audits and/or self-assessment  
List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR  
reports addressing  
program since last BRQ  
the licensed operator requalification  
*  
training program * Last 2-years of simulator  
Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator  
review committee (or equivalent)  
requalification training program  
meeting minutes Enclosure
*  
* Last 2-years of CRC (or equivalent)  
Last 2-years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes  
meeting minutes 2.3 Biennial Regualification  
Enclosure  
Written Examination  
 
Qual!h'. * The current and approved biennial written examination  
*  
schedule * The current requalification  
Last 2-years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes  
cycle written examination  
2.3  
results for both SRO and RO that have already been administered  
Biennial Regualification Written Examination Qual!h'.  
up to the week prior to the inspection  
*  
team arrival on-site * All.written  
The current and approved biennial written examination schedule
examinations  
*  
that have been approved for administration  
The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO and RO  
up to and including  
that have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team
the week before the inspection  
arrival on-site  
team is on-site. This will need to have adequate password protection  
*  
if e-mailed or double envelope protection  
All.written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and  
if mailed via regular mail per NUREG-1021.  
including the week before the inspection team is on-site. This will need to have  
* The current requalification  
adequate password protection if e-mailed or double envelope protection if mailed via  
cycle examination  
regular mail per NUREG-1021.  
methodology (sample plan} 2.4 Annual Regualification  
*  
Operating  
The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan}  
Test Quality 2.5 2.6 * The schedule for the operating  
2.4  
tests (JPMs and scenarios)  
Annual Regualification Operating Test Quality  
to be given the week of June 4, 2018 * The operating  
2.5  
tests (JPMs and scenarios) (password  
2.6  
protected  
*  
and provide separately  
The schedule for the operating tests (JPMs and scenarios) to be given the week of  
via telephone  
June 4, 2018  
at later date) to be given the week of June 4, 2018 * Current requalification  
*  
cycle operating  
The operating tests (JPMs and scenarios) (password protected and provide  
tests (SRO and RO) and results up to the week prior to the inspection  
separately via telephone at later date) to be given the week of June 4, 2018  
team arrival on-site (NIA if the inspection  
*  
week is the first week of testing) * All.of the previous year's NRC required annual operating  
Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO and RO) and results up to the  
tests * Current requalification  
week prior to the inspection team arrival on-site (NIA if the inspection week is the  
cycle operating  
first week of testing)  
test methodology (sample plan) * All portions of the updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) that identify operator response times for time critical operator actions Licensee Admin of Requalification  
*  
Exams * All procedures  
All.of the previous year's NRC required annual operating tests
used to administer  
*  
the annual operating  
Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)  
test * All procedures  
*  
used to assess operator perfomiance  
All portions of the updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) that identify  
* All procedures  
operator response times for time critical operator actions  
that describe conduct of simulator  
Licensee Admin of Requalification Exams
training * All procedures  
*  
used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator  
All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
Regualification  
*  
Examination  
All procedures used to assess operator perfomiance  
Secur~ * Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive  
*  
overlap on the written examinations  
All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a periodic basis * Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive  
*  
overlap on 2
All procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator  
the operating  
Regualification Examination Secur~  
tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions (including  
*  
major events, instrument/component  
Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on  
malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a periodic basis * All procedures  
the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a  
that describe examination  
periodic basis  
security, including  
*  
procedures  
Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on  
used to develop the examinations  
2  
that include guidelines  
 
on overlap between examinations  
the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions  
(including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a  
periodic basis  
*  
All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to  
develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations  
in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations  
in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations  
* List of all condition  
*  
reports since the last biennial requalification  
List of all condition reports since the last biennial requalification inspection related to  
inspection  
examination security and overlap  
related to examination  
2.7  
security and overlap 2.7 Licensee Remedial Training Program 2.8 2.9 * List of remedial training conducted  
Licensee Remedial Training Program  
or planned since last requalification  
2.8  
exams (includes  
2.9  
training provided to operators  
*  
to enable passing requalification  
List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requalification exams
exams and training provided to correct generic or individual  
(includes training provided to operators to enable passing requalification exams and  
weaknesses  
training provided to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during  
observed during previous requalification  
previous requalification exam cycle)  
exam cycle) * Remediation  
*  
plans (lesson plans, reference  
Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance  
materials, and attendance  
documentation)  
documentation)  
Conformance  
Conformance with Operator License Conditions  
with Operator License Conditions  
*  
* All procedures  
All procedures and program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses,  
and program documentation  
tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators  
for maintaining  
*  
active operator licenses, tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators  
All procedures and associated documentation that supports reactivation of any  
* All procedures  
SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection  
and associated  
Simulator Performance  
documentation  
*  
that supports reactivation  
For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be  
of any SRO/RO license (operating  
electronic or in paper single test packages, and shall be complete with test  
or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection  
procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient  
Simulator  
test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert  
Performance  
review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the  
* For the following  
ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.  
cases, send the most recent transient  
o Transient test 1, manual reactor trip  
test packages, which may be electronic  
o Transient test 5, trip of any single reactor coolant pump  
or in paper single test packages, and shall be complete with test procedures  
o Transient test 8, maximum size RCS rupture combined with loss of all offsite  
for each test, the acceptance  
power  
criteria, and results. For each transient  
o Steady state tests for low power  
test, the reference chart  
*  
should be included or an equivalent  
SBT Packages for any three scenarios used for the 2017 Annual Requalification  
subject matter expert review versus the simulator  
Operating Test
results with a write-up for any differences  
3  
beyond the ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.  
 
o Transient  
*  
test 1 , manual reactor trip o Transient  
All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for  
test 5, trip of any single reactor coolant pump o Transient  
Section 02.05 above  
test 8, maximum size RCS rupture combined with loss of all offsite power o Steady state tests for low power * SBT Packages for any three scenarios  
*  
used for the 2017 Annual Requalification  
Simulator Discrepancy Report (DR) summacx list for all open DRs. For closed DRs,  
Operating  
summary list for those items closed between June 2016 to May 2018  
Test 3
*  
* All Simulator  
Malfunction tests for loss of condenser vacuum and reactor pressure control system  
Management  
failure. If these are included in an SBT package then the review of that package  
and Configuration  
would be acceptable  
Procedures  
*  
if not already provided for Section 02.05 above * Simulator  
Two examples of primary parameters tested in order to verify core physics  
Discrepancy  
parameters. The applicable reference grf}phs from the plant physics data book  
Report (DR) summacx list for all open DRs. For closed DRs, summary list for those items closed between June 2016 to May 2018 * Malfunction  
(electronic or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test  
tests for loss of condenser  
procedures used and the acceptance criteria with results.  
vacuum and reactor pressure control system failure. If these are included in an SBT package then the review of that package would be acceptable  
*  
* Two examples of primary parameters  
All simulator modification packages that are on hold, delayed, or just not completed  
tested in order to verify core physics parameters.  
in the last 2-years  
The applicable  
*  
reference  
A list of simulator modification packages completed in the last 2-year window  
grf}phs from the plant physics data book (electronic  
2.10  
or other means as available)  
Problem Identification and Resolution  
should also be included as well as the test procedures  
*  
used and the acceptance  
A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the  
criteria with results. * All simulator  
control room  
modification  
*  
packages that are on hold, delayed, or just not completed  
Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance  
in the last 2-years * A list of simulator  
issues  
modification  
B. The following information is requested in order to support the on-site inspection  
packages completed  
activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either  
in the last 2-year window 2.10 Problem Identification  
electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on June 4, 2018.  
and Resolution * A summary report of all condition  
2.2  
reports related to operator actions/errors  
2.8  
in the control room * Any revised requalification  
2.9  
training that was based on licensed operator performance  
Exam Results / 02.03 and 02.04: Written Exam and Op Test Qualit'l  
issues B. The following  
*  
information  
All Operating tests (JPMs and scenarios) to be given in all subsequent weeks after  
is requested  
on-site week  
in order to support the on-site inspection  
*  
activities.  
All results up to the day the team leaves the site  
Requested  
Conformance with Operator License Conditions  
materials  
*  
should be available  
Access to licensed operators' records ( operating and staff crews)  
to the inspection  
*  
team, either electronically  
Access to licensed operators' training attendance records
or hardcopy, upon site arrival on June 4, 2018. 2.2 2.8 2.9 Exam Results / 02.03 and 02.04: Written Exam and Op Test Qualit'l * All Operating  
*  
tests (JPMs and scenarios)  
Access to licensed operators' medical records  
to be given in all subsequent  
Simulator Performance  
weeks after on-site week * All results up to the day the team leaves the site Conformance  
*  
with Operator License Conditions  
Simulator discrepancy reports (DRs) from June 2016 to May 2018. This should  
* Access to licensed operators'  
include all open DR's and DR's that have been closed, including the
records ( operating  
documentation/justification for closure.  
and staff crews) * Access to licensed operators'  
4  
training attendance  
 
records * Access to licensed operators'  
*  
medical records Simulator  
Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at
Performance  
the time of acceptance (as available)  
* Simulator  
*  
discrepancy  
Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal*hydraulics and
reports (DRs) from June 2016 to May 2018. This should include all open DR's and DR's that have been closed, including  
neutronics models, to the actual plant  
the documentation/justification  
* All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs. Design differences in the  
for closure. 4
simulator (any documentation on this)  
* Acceptance  
*  
test documentation, including  
Summary list of modifications from June 2016 to May 2018  
hardware and software model revisions  
*  
at the time of acceptance (as available)  
Plant modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the simulator by due  
* Documentation  
date from June 2016 to May 2018  
that validates  
*  
current models, including  
Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to June 4, 2018)  
the thermal*hydraulics  
*  
and neutronics  
The complete book of all simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a  
models, to the actual plant * All current model deficiencies, including  
single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all  
FSAR vs. Design differences  
transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include  
in the simulator (any documentation  
the test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each  
on this) * Summary list of modifications  
transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter  
from June 2016 to May 2018 * Plant modifications (both hardware and software)  
expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond
completed  
the ANSI standard requirements.  
on the simulator  
*  
by due date from June 2016 to May 2018 * Simulator  
All test packages used to verify core physics parameters. The applicable reference  
Differences  
graphs from the plant physics data book ( electronic or other means as available)  
Lesson plan used in training (current to June 4, 2018) * The complete book of all simulator  
should also be included as well as the test procedures used and the acceptance  
annual performance  
criteria with results.  
test packages (usually in a single book, but may be electronic  
*  
or in single test packages), complete with all transient  
All simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the  
tests, steady state tests, and malfunction  
room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages,  
tests. This should also include the test procedures  
simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.  
for each test, the acceptance  
*  
criteria, and results. For each transient  
Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for simulator testing
test, the reference  
2.10  
chart should be included or an equivalent  
Problem Identification and Resolution  
subject matter expert review versus the simulator  
* All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room  
results with a write-up for any differences  
C. Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation is required to send the final results  
beyond the ANSI standard requirements.  
summary, and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been  
* All test packages used to verify core physics parameters.  
reviewed to the Regional office lead inspector for this inspection for final review  
The applicable  
and comparison against the significance determination tools in order to  
reference  
communicate the exit results for the inspection.  
graphs from the plant physics data book ( electronic  
or other means as available)  
should also be included as well as the test procedures  
used and the acceptance  
criteria with results. * All simulator  
test, configuration  
management, and related documents  
available  
in the room for inspectors  
to review. This includes training needs analysis packages, simulator  
review committee  
meeting minutes, etc. * Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed  
to for simulator  
testing 2.10 Problem Identification  
and Resolution  
* All condition  
reports related to operator actions/errors  
in the control room C. Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating  
Corporation  
is required to send the final results summary, and any remaining  
exams and operating  
tests that have not been reviewed to the Regional office lead inspector  
for this inspection  
for final review and comparison  
against the significance  
determination  
tools in order to communicate  
the exit results for the inspection.  
5
5
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 20:29, 5 January 2025

Errata for Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation - Notification of Inspection (NRC Inspection Report 05000482/2018002) and Request for Information
ML18145A249
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek 
Issue date: 05/29/2018
From: Vincent Gaddy
Operations Branch IV
To: Heflin A
Wolf Creek
References
IR 2018002
Download: ML18145A249 (9)


See also: IR 05000482/2018002

Text

Adam C. Heflin, President,

Chief Executive Officer,

and Chief Nuclear Officer

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

1600 EAST LAMAR BOULEVARD

ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511

May 29, 2018

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation

P.O. Box411

Burlington, KS 66839

SUBJECT:

ERRATA FOR WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION -

NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT

05000482/2018002) AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Dear Mr. Heflin:

It was identified that the notification sent to you dated April 25, 2018 (NRC's Agencywide

Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18116A613)

improperly listed the inspection report number as 05000482/2018002. The correct inspection

report number is 05000482/2018003. Please note none of the content of the request for

information has changed. The NRC has reissued the notification in its entirety to correct this

error.

This fetter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection

and copying at http:/!www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document

Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for

Withholding."

Docket No. 50-482

License No. NPF-42

Enclosure:

Sincerely,

IRA/

Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERA TING

CORPORATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION

(NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000482/2018003)

AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

cc: Electronic Distribution

ML 18145A249

~ SUNSI Review

[&] Non-Sensitive

~ Publicly Available

Bv: JCK

CJ Sensitive

CJ Non-Publiclv Available

OFFICE

SOE:OB

C:OB

NAME

JKiridand

VGaddy

SIGNATURE

IRA/

IRA/

DATE

05/29/18

05/29/18

Adam C. Heflin, President,

Chief Executive Officer,

and Chief Nuclear Officer

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGJON IV

1600 EAST LAMAR BOULEVARD

ARLINGTON. TEXAS 76011-4511

May 29, 2018

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation

P.O. Box411

Burlington, KS 66839

SUBJECT:

WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION - NOTIFICATION OF

INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000482/2018003) AND

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Dear Mr. Heflin:

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

staff will conduct a biennial requalification inspection at the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating

Corporation from June 4 - 7, 2018. The inspection will consist of two reactor inspectors from

the NRC's Region IV office for one week. The inspection will be conducted in accordance with

the NRC Inspection Procedure {IP) 71111.11 B, "Licensed Operator Requalification Program."

Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive inspection both for the NRC

inspectors and your staff. In order to minimize the impact to your on-site resources and to

ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this

inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups. The first group (Section A

of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the inspection to ensure that the

inspectors are adequately prepared. The second group (Section B of the enclosure) identifies

the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The third group {Section C of

this enclosure) identifies the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are

usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important that all of these

documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional

documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection.

We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand

that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. Lucille Stone. Our inspection dates are

subject to change based on your updated schedule of examination activities. If there are any

questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector,

John Kirkland, at (817) 200-1771 (John.Kirkland@nrc.gov).

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject

To the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control

number 3150-0018.

A. Heflin

2

The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for

information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a

currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter

and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public

Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document

system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Docket No. 50-482

License No. NPF-42

Enclosure:

Request for Information

cc: Electronic Distribution

Sincerely,

IRA!

Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Inspection Report:

Inspection Dates:

Initial Request for Information

Biennial Requalification Inspection

Wolf Creek Generating Station

05000482/2018003

June 4- 7, 2018

Inspection Procedure:

IP 71111.11 B, "Licensed Operator Requalification

Program"

Lead Inspector:

John Kirkland, Senior Operations Engineer

A. The following information is requested In order to support inspection preparation

activities. These items are fisted by section as they appear in the inspection

module (ie 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested materf als should be sent either electronically

or CD/DVD ( do not send USB drives) in order to arrive at the Region IV office no

later than May 14, 2018.

Electronically: To: John.Kirkland@nrc.gov

cc: Clyde.Osterholtz@nrc.gov

CD/DVD to: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Region IV

General Bequests:

ATTN: John Kirkland

1600 E. Lamar Blvd

Arlington, TX 76011

List of licensed operators (SRO and RO) by crew (operating and staff)

Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR

evaluators identified)

Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training

program up-to-date

List of outstanding LOR program changes

List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR

program since last BRQ

Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator

requalification training program

Last 2-years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes

Enclosure

Last 2-years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes

2.3

Biennial Regualification Written Examination Qual!h'.

The current and approved biennial written examination schedule

The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO and RO

that have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team

arrival on-site

All.written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and

including the week before the inspection team is on-site. This will need to have

adequate password protection if e-mailed or double envelope protection if mailed via

regular mail per NUREG-1021.

The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan}

2.4

Annual Regualification Operating Test Quality

2.5

2.6

The schedule for the operating tests (JPMs and scenarios) to be given the week of

June 4, 2018

The operating tests (JPMs and scenarios) (password protected and provide

separately via telephone at later date) to be given the week of June 4, 2018

Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO and RO) and results up to the

week prior to the inspection team arrival on-site (NIA if the inspection week is the

first week of testing)

All.of the previous year's NRC required annual operating tests

Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)

All portions of the updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) that identify

operator response times for time critical operator actions

Licensee Admin of Requalification Exams

All procedures used to administer the annual operating test

All procedures used to assess operator perfomiance

All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training

All procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator

Regualification Examination Secur~

Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on

the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a

periodic basis

Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on

2

the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions

(including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a

periodic basis

All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to

develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations

in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations

List of all condition reports since the last biennial requalification inspection related to

examination security and overlap

2.7

Licensee Remedial Training Program

2.8

2.9

List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requalification exams

(includes training provided to operators to enable passing requalification exams and

training provided to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during

previous requalification exam cycle)

Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance

documentation)

Conformance with Operator License Conditions

All procedures and program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses,

tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators

All procedures and associated documentation that supports reactivation of any

SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection

Simulator Performance

For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be

electronic or in paper single test packages, and shall be complete with test

procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient

test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert

review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the

ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.

o Transient test 1, manual reactor trip

o Transient test 5, trip of any single reactor coolant pump

o Transient test 8, maximum size RCS rupture combined with loss of all offsite

power

o Steady state tests for low power

SBT Packages for any three scenarios used for the 2017 Annual Requalification

Operating Test

3

All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for

Section 02.05 above

Simulator Discrepancy Report (DR) summacx list for all open DRs. For closed DRs,

summary list for those items closed between June 2016 to May 2018

Malfunction tests for loss of condenser vacuum and reactor pressure control system

failure. If these are included in an SBT package then the review of that package

would be acceptable

Two examples of primary parameters tested in order to verify core physics

parameters. The applicable reference grf}phs from the plant physics data book

(electronic or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test

procedures used and the acceptance criteria with results.

All simulator modification packages that are on hold, delayed, or just not completed

in the last 2-years

A list of simulator modification packages completed in the last 2-year window

2.10

Problem Identification and Resolution

A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the

control room

Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance

issues

B. The following information is requested in order to support the on-site inspection

activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either

electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on June 4, 2018.

2.2

2.8

2.9

Exam Results / 02.03 and 02.04: Written Exam and Op Test Qualit'l

All Operating tests (JPMs and scenarios) to be given in all subsequent weeks after

on-site week

All results up to the day the team leaves the site

Conformance with Operator License Conditions

Access to licensed operators' records ( operating and staff crews)

Access to licensed operators' training attendance records

Access to licensed operators' medical records

Simulator Performance

Simulator discrepancy reports (DRs) from June 2016 to May 2018. This should

include all open DR's and DR's that have been closed, including the

documentation/justification for closure.

4

Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at

the time of acceptance (as available)

Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal*hydraulics and

neutronics models, to the actual plant

  • All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs. Design differences in the

simulator (any documentation on this)

Summary list of modifications from June 2016 to May 2018

Plant modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the simulator by due

date from June 2016 to May 2018

Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to June 4, 2018)

The complete book of all simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a

single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all

transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include

the test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each

transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter

expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond

the ANSI standard requirements.

All test packages used to verify core physics parameters. The applicable reference

graphs from the plant physics data book ( electronic or other means as available)

should also be included as well as the test procedures used and the acceptance

criteria with results.

All simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the

room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages,

simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.

Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for simulator testing

2.10

Problem Identification and Resolution

  • All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room

C. Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation is required to send the final results

summary, and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been

reviewed to the Regional office lead inspector for this inspection for final review

and comparison against the significance determination tools in order to

communicate the exit results for the inspection.

5