ML18157A378: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC | {{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 6/5/18 12:53 PM Received: June 05, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1k2-93jq-txr5 Comments Due: June 05, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel Waste Comment On: NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document: NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0055 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Carmela Price Address: | ||
2401 Mariposa West Unit 1E Laguna Woods, CA, 92637 Email: etausk@comline.com General Comment I support the recommendations of the Citizens Oversight that a second layer of containment be required at San Onofre. A container wall of 5/8 inch thickness poses an unacceptable risk to the millions of people in this area. | |||
Page 1 of 1 06/05/2018 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=090000648333e940&format=xml&showorig=false 52 PRM-72-8 83 FR 12504}} | |||
Latest revision as of 18:31, 5 January 2025
| ML18157A378 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/2018 |
| From: | Price C - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | NRC/SECY/RAS |
| SECY/RAS | |
| References | |
| 82FR12504 00052, NRC-2018-0017, PRM-72-8 | |
| Download: ML18157A378 (1) | |
Text
PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 6/5/18 12:53 PM Received: June 05, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1k2-93jq-txr5 Comments Due: June 05, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel Waste Comment On: NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document: NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0055 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Carmela Price Address:
2401 Mariposa West Unit 1E Laguna Woods, CA, 92637 Email: etausk@comline.com General Comment I support the recommendations of the Citizens Oversight that a second layer of containment be required at San Onofre. A container wall of 5/8 inch thickness poses an unacceptable risk to the millions of people in this area.
Page 1 of 1 06/05/2018 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=090000648333e940&format=xml&showorig=false 52 PRM-72-8 83 FR 12504