ML18348A827: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18348A827
| number = ML18348A827
| issue date = 12/13/2018
| issue date = 12/13/2018
| title = OIG-19-A-05-Audit of Nrc'S License Amendment Request Acceptance Review Process Chairman Transmittal Memo Dated December 13, 2016
| title = OIG-19-A-05-Audit of NRCs License Amendment Request Acceptance Review Process Chairman Transmittal Memo Dated December 13, 2016
| author name = Bell H
| author name = Bell H
| author affiliation = NRC/OIG
| author affiliation = NRC/OIG
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001     OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL   December 13, 2018   MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Svinicki   FROM:   Hubert T. Bell /RA/ Inspector General  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL December 13, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO:
Chairman Svinicki FROM:
Hubert T. Bell /RA/
Inspector General  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
SE AMENDMENT REQUEST ACCEPTANCE REVIEW PROCESS (OIG-19-A-05)   Attached is License Amendment Request Acceptance Review Process. The audit objective was to viewing nuclear power plant License Amendment Requests, with emphasis on preliminary acceptance/rejection procedures and other actions taken to ensure timely, consistent, and well-supported decisions. OIG found that NRC is using an inefficient and potentially inaccurate process to develop completed acceptance review reports. However, NRC can benefit from a strengthened quality assurance process and enhancement of the Replacement Reactor Program System to generate automated reports. If you have any questions, please contact Dr. Brett M. Baker, Assistant Inspector General for Audits, at (301) 415-5915 or me, at (301) 415-5930.  
AUDIT OF NRCS LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST ACCEPTANCE REVIEW PROCESS (OIG-19-A-05)
Attached is the Office of the Inspector Generals (OIG) audit report titled Audit of NRCs License Amendment Request Acceptance Review Process. The audit objective was to assess NRCs processes for reviewing nuclear power plant License Amendment Requests, with emphasis on preliminary acceptance/rejection procedures and other actions taken to ensure timely, consistent, and well-supported decisions.
OIG found that NRC is using an inefficient and potentially inaccurate process to develop completed acceptance review reports. However, NRC can benefit from a strengthened quality assurance process and enhancement of the Replacement Reactor Program System to generate automated reports.
If you have any questions, please contact Dr. Brett M. Baker, Assistant Inspector General for Audits, at (301) 415-5915 or me, at (301) 415-5930.  


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
As stated cc: Commissioner Baran Commissioner Burns Commissioner Caputo Commissioner Wright R. Lewis, OEDO}}
As stated cc:
Commissioner Baran Commissioner Burns Commissioner Caputo Commissioner Wright R. Lewis, OEDO}}

Latest revision as of 08:20, 5 January 2025

OIG-19-A-05-Audit of NRCs License Amendment Request Acceptance Review Process Chairman Transmittal Memo Dated December 13, 2016
ML18348A827
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/13/2018
From: Bell H
NRC/OIG
To: Kristine Svinicki
NRC/Chairman
References
OIG-19-A-05
Download: ML18348A827 (1)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL December 13, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO:

Chairman Svinicki FROM:

Hubert T. Bell /RA/

Inspector General

SUBJECT:

AUDIT OF NRCS LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST ACCEPTANCE REVIEW PROCESS (OIG-19-A-05)

Attached is the Office of the Inspector Generals (OIG) audit report titled Audit of NRCs License Amendment Request Acceptance Review Process. The audit objective was to assess NRCs processes for reviewing nuclear power plant License Amendment Requests, with emphasis on preliminary acceptance/rejection procedures and other actions taken to ensure timely, consistent, and well-supported decisions.

OIG found that NRC is using an inefficient and potentially inaccurate process to develop completed acceptance review reports. However, NRC can benefit from a strengthened quality assurance process and enhancement of the Replacement Reactor Program System to generate automated reports.

If you have any questions, please contact Dr. Brett M. Baker, Assistant Inspector General for Audits, at (301) 415-5915 or me, at (301) 415-5930.

Attachment:

As stated cc:

Commissioner Baran Commissioner Burns Commissioner Caputo Commissioner Wright R. Lewis, OEDO