ML19257A897: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:*
{{#Wiki_filter:*
e
e ENCLOSURE SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 INAPPROPRIATE SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF UHI PIPING NCR CEB 79-36 10 CFR 50.55(e)
  .  .
ENCLOSURE SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 INAPPROPRIATE SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF UHI PIPING NCR CEB 79-36 10 CFR 50.55(e)
FINAL REPORT Description of Condition The seismic analysis of record for the 12-inch UHI piping in unit 2, from the gas to the water accumulators, is the unit 1 analysis since the piping is opposite hand. However, the building which houses the unit 2 UHI piping is physically different from the unit 1 building.
FINAL REPORT Description of Condition The seismic analysis of record for the 12-inch UHI piping in unit 2, from the gas to the water accumulators, is the unit 1 analysis since the piping is opposite hand. However, the building which houses the unit 2 UHI piping is physically different from the unit 1 building.
This requires the use of a different seismic response spectra in the piping analysis for unit 2.
This requires the use of a different seismic response spectra in the piping analysis for unit 2.
Line 26: Line 24:
Safety Implications Had this condition gone uncorrected, the safety-related UHI piping could have been adversely affected during a seismic event.
Safety Implications Had this condition gone uncorrected, the safety-related UHI piping could have been adversely affected during a seismic event.
Corrective t.ction The unit 2 piping will be reanalyzed using the appropriate seismic response spectra. Any required hardware modifications will be com-pleted before unit 2 fuel loading.
Corrective t.ction The unit 2 piping will be reanalyzed using the appropriate seismic response spectra. Any required hardware modifications will be com-pleted before unit 2 fuel loading.
1707 282 3 L2-5001099 84l>}}
1707 282 3 L2-5001099 84l>}}

Latest revision as of 20:57, 3 January 2025

Final Deficiency Rept Re Inappropriate Seismic Analysis of Upper Head Injection Piping.Unit 2 Piping Required Different Seismic Response Spectra.Piping Will Be Reanalyzed Using Appropriate Seismic Response Spectra
ML19257A897
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah 
Issue date: 01/02/1980
From:
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
Shared Package
ML19257A896 List:
References
NCR-CEB-79-36, NUDOCS 8001090362
Download: ML19257A897 (1)


Text

e ENCLOSURE SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 INAPPROPRIATE SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF UHI PIPING NCR CEB 79-36 10 CFR 50.55(e)

FINAL REPORT Description of Condition The seismic analysis of record for the 12-inch UHI piping in unit 2, from the gas to the water accumulators, is the unit 1 analysis since the piping is opposite hand. However, the building which houses the unit 2 UHI piping is physically different from the unit 1 building.

This requires the use of a different seismic response spectra in the piping analysis for unit 2.

This discrapancy'was overlooked in the original seismic analysis.

Safety Implications Had this condition gone uncorrected, the safety-related UHI piping could have been adversely affected during a seismic event.

Corrective t.ction The unit 2 piping will be reanalyzed using the appropriate seismic response spectra. Any required hardware modifications will be com-pleted before unit 2 fuel loading.

1707 282 3 L2-5001099 84l>