ML19317F186: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. | {{#Wiki_filter:. | ||
e 4 | e 4 | ||
g | g September 26, 1972 Seneca, South Carolina | ||
(~/ | (~/ | ||
Liould | U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C. | ||
Sofid Waste " | 20545 Deputy Director For Reactor Projects Attention: Director of Licensing Gentlemen The Benefit-Cost Comparison for the Oconee Nuclear Power Station in the Draft Detailed Statement on the E Gaseous Discharge 14 Man-rems / year /3 units 100 Liould Sofid Waste " | ||
Gaseous Discharge 4 | 5 The Final Environmental Statement listed in the ing effect: | ||
Gaseous Discharge 4 Man-rems / year 6 | |||
Liquid The reduction in radiological discharge is impressive and Unfortu-I am obviously curious how this was accomplished, nately I could not find a reference regarding this fact inWould you b the Final Environmental Statement, inform me where the refe I would appreciate your assistance. | |||
Very truly yours, u da f ; sf & ' | Very truly yours, u da f ; sf & ' | ||
' Herbert Knohl Rt. 1 Box 282 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 8 82080 jP2pcs i.< - >c;- sa-ai r3}} | |||
82080 jP2pcs i.< - >c;- sa- ai r3}} | |||
Latest revision as of 21:48, 1 January 2025
| ML19317F186 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 11/07/1972 |
| From: | Knohl H AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19317F181 | List: |
| References | |
| 720926, NUDOCS 8001080900 | |
| Download: ML19317F186 (1) | |
Text
.
e 4
g September 26, 1972 Seneca, South Carolina
(~/
U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C.
20545 Deputy Director For Reactor Projects Attention: Director of Licensing Gentlemen The Benefit-Cost Comparison for the Oconee Nuclear Power Station in the Draft Detailed Statement on the E Gaseous Discharge 14 Man-rems / year /3 units 100 Liould Sofid Waste "
5 The Final Environmental Statement listed in the ing effect:
Gaseous Discharge 4 Man-rems / year 6
Liquid The reduction in radiological discharge is impressive and Unfortu-I am obviously curious how this was accomplished, nately I could not find a reference regarding this fact inWould you b the Final Environmental Statement, inform me where the refe I would appreciate your assistance.
Very truly yours, u da f ; sf & '
' Herbert Knohl Rt. 1 Box 282 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 8 82080 jP2pcs i.< - >c;- sa-ai r3