ML19323J077: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML19323J077
| number = ML19323J077
| issue date = 05/19/1980
| issue date = 05/19/1980
| title = Responds to NRC 800424 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-07 & 50-567/80-07.Corrective Actions:Purge Air Blower Filters & Solenoid Valve Cleaned
| title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-07 & 50-567/80-07.Corrective Actions:Purge Air Blower Filters & Solenoid Valve Cleaned
| author name = Mills L
| author name = Mills L
| author affiliation = TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
| author affiliation = TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8006170746
| document report number = NUDOCS 8006170746
| title reference date = 04-24-1980
| package number = ML19323J071
| package number = ML19323J071
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
Line 18: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_,
{{#Wiki_filter:_,
  *
.. o.
      .
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 374o1 400 Chestnut Street Tower II May 19, 1980 A,
  . o.
.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
          ,                            CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 374o1 400 Chestnut Street Tower II May 19, 1980
                                                                                    ,. .
* A,   .
                                                                                      . .    ...
        '
                                                                                                ,
                                                                                      ,.
_
93 1
93 1
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director                                         ~$
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director
                                                                                        ,
~$
Office of Inspection and Enforcement c
Office of Inspection and Enforcement c
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                       u Region II - Suite 3100 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303                                                             -
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission u
                                                                                                    '
Region II - Suite 3100 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303


==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC-OIE REGION II LETTER RII:JRH 50-566/80-07 AND 50-567/80 INSPECTION REPORT -
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC-OIE REGION II LETTER RII:JRH 50-566/80-07 AND 50-567/80 INSPECTION REPORT -
RESPONSE TO INFRACTION The subject letter dated April 24, 1980, cited TVA with one deficiency in accordance with 10 CFR 2.201. Enclosed is our response to that deficiency.
RESPONSE TO INFRACTION The subject {{letter dated|date=April 24, 1980|text=letter dated April 24, 1980}}, cited TVA with one deficiency in accordance with 10 CFR 2.201.
Enclosed is our response to that deficiency.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with D. L. Lambert at FTS 854-2581.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with D. L. Lambert at FTS 854-2581.
                                                                        -        -
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY M
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY M
                                                        . M. Mills, Manag r Nuclear Regulation and Safety l
. M. Mills, Manag r Nuclear Regulation and Safety l
Enclosure cc: Mr. Victor   Stello, Jr., Director (Enclosure)
Enclosure Mr. Victor Stello, Jr., Director (Enclosure) cc:
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 80g1 y Qyh An Equal Opportunity Employer
            -
-Q OFFICLEgg s
                                                          '
                                                              , ,<
80g1 y Qyh                           An Equal Opportunity Employer
* s
                      -Q                                                               OFFICLEgg


      - , . - -                  ..    - . - . . ..      - - .
ENCLOSURE w
    *
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 RESPONSE TO DEFICIENCY 566/80-07-01 AND 567/80-07-01 Deficiency As required by Criterion XVII of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, and implemented by PSAR Section 17.lA.17, " Sufficient records shall be maintained to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality."
                  .
Contrary to the above, records generated by the batch plant are inaccurate on pour number Al-Pr and Al-J1.
  ' .'            .-
On pour number Al-Pr, records produced by the batch plant recorder are inaccurate in that batch times are unreadable, curves showing batch ingredient quantities begin several increments above the zero reference line. On pour number Al-J1 the recorded water contents for test number 1302 and 1304 are not compatible with the recorded slump tests.
                                                                                          .
Corrective Action TVA's review of the recorder charts for contrete pours Al-P3 and Al-J1 showed that the date and time printed by the automatic printer were illegible for a significant part of the shift.
ENCLOSURE w             .
However, the date and approximate time could be determined from the mixing plant records.
                        -
The problem was due to dirty filters on purge air blowers and a faulty solenoid valve on the printer.
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 RESPONSE TO DEFICIENCY 566/80-07-01 AND 567/80-07-01
              ''
Deficiency
* As required by Criterion XVII of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, and implemented by PSAR Section 17.lA.17, " Sufficient records shall be maintained to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality."
Contrary to the above, records generated by the batch plant are inaccurate on pour number Al-Pr and Al-J1.           On pour number Al-Pr, records produced by the batch plant recorder are inaccurate in that batch times are unreadable, curves showing batch ingredient quantities begin several increments above the zero reference line. On pour number Al-J1 the recorded water contents for test number 1302 and 1304 are not compatible with the recorded slump tests.                                                            .
Corrective Action TVA's review of the recorder charts for contrete pours Al-P3 and Al-J1 showed that the date and time printed by the automatic printer were illegible for a significant part of the shift.           However, the date and approximate time could be determined from the mixing plant records.             The problem was due to dirty filters on purge air blowers and a faulty solenoid valve on the printer.
TVA's corrective action was to replace the filters and clean the solenoid valve. We are now getting clear printing.
TVA's corrective action was to replace the filters and clean the solenoid valve. We are now getting clear printing.
The scale lines are printed onto the chart paper by an automatic printer during operation.         The printer rolls have become worn and cause faint lines.
The scale lines are printed onto the chart paper by an automatic printer during operation.
The printer rolls have become worn and cause faint lines.
At present, the quantities can be determined by interpolation. New printer rolls have been ordered and should eliminate the problem completely.
At present, the quantities can be determined by interpolation. New printer rolls have been ordered and should eliminate the problem completely.
The rezeroing problem has been investigated by TVA instrumentation engineers and is primarily restricted to the water, AEA, and WRA. The ingredients are released into the mixer slowly, and the recorder pins sometimes fail to rezero because of excessive pin pressure and the loss of pin momentum.
The rezeroing problem has been investigated by TVA instrumentation engineers and is primarily restricted to the water, AEA, and WRA.
The heavy pin pressure was to keep the pins from " jumping" off the chart 4
The ingredients are released into the mixer slowly, and the recorder pins sometimes fail to rezero because of excessive pin pressure and the loss of pin momentum.
because of plant vibration and was apparently excessive.
The heavy pin pressure was to keep the pins from " jumping" off the chart because of plant vibration and was apparently excessive.
The failure to rezero causes only an apparent error and is being investigated further. TVA's corrective action was to optimize the pin pressure and instruct operators and inspectors to monitor and rezero if required.
4 The failure to rezero causes only an apparent error and is being investigated further. TVA's corrective action was to optimize the pin pressure and instruct operators and inspectors to monitor and rezero if required.
The recorded water contents for test numbers 1302 r.:.o 1304 do not correlate with the slump test for concrete pour Al-J1.           At tu; *tme of this pour, the procedure was to take one aggregate moisture content test per shif t and was in compliance with General Construction Specification G-2 and QCI 204 RS.         l A close correlation between slump and water content would not be obtained from one aggregate moisture test per shift. The change in moisture content
The recorded water contents for test numbers 1302 r.:.o 1304 do not correlate with the slump test for concrete pour Al-J1.
                                                                    ~
At tu; *tme of this pour, the procedure was to take one aggregate moisture content test per shif t and was in compliance with General Construction Specification G-2 and QCI 204 RS.
of the aggregate causes a change in the water required to maintain correct slump.                                                                                 ,
l A close correlation between slump and water content would not be obtained from one aggregate moisture test per shift.
l
The change in moisture content
                      .
~
                          .
of the aggregate causes a change in the water required to maintain correct slump.
                                                                          '
''.(
                                                                          '.(
                                                                                  ,


_
*,*. ~..
      ..                      .      .. _ _ _ . . . . _
E Steps Taken to Avoid Further Recurrence Proper preventive maintenance will be performed to prevent a recurrence in the lack of quality in printing of records produced by the batch I;,
  *
plant recorder.
            .
  *,* . ~ . .                                                                                                    .
                                                                          .
E         , .
Steps Taken to Avoid Further Recurrence                               .
Proper preventive maintenance will be performed to prevent a recurrence in the lack of quality in printing of records produced by the batch I;,       plant recorder.
To prevent a recurrence of the rezeroing problem, TVA will investigate the plant for any excessive vibration and monitor the pin closely to k' ep the pressure optimized.
To prevent a recurrence of the rezeroing problem, TVA will investigate the plant for any excessive vibration and monitor the pin closely to k' ep the pressure optimized.
General Construction Specification QCI 204 R6 requires a moisture content
General Construction Specification QCI 204 R6 requires a moisture content
                  . test every two hours,'and a closer correlation will be obtained.
. test every two hours,'and a closer correlation will be obtained.
                                                                                                '
Date of Full Compliance Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant will be in full compliance by July 8, 1980.
Date of Full Compliance Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant will be in full compliance by July 8, 1980.
                                                                              .
I i
I i
f
f B
                                                        .
A a.
B
8
                .                                                                  .
^
A
4C, 4
: a. 8
.....-}}
                                                            ^
                                                                  . 4C, 4
                                                                        ..  -          . . - ,  .
                                                                                                    . . . . .-}}

Latest revision as of 18:40, 31 December 2024

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-07 & 50-567/80-07.Corrective Actions:Purge Air Blower Filters & Solenoid Valve Cleaned
ML19323J077
Person / Time
Site: Yellow Creek  
Issue date: 05/19/1980
From: Mills L
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19323J071 List:
References
NUDOCS 8006170746
Download: ML19323J077 (3)


Text

_,

.. o.

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 374o1 400 Chestnut Street Tower II May 19, 1980 A,

93 1

Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director

~$

Office of Inspection and Enforcement c

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission u

Region II - Suite 3100 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC-OIE REGION II LETTER RII:JRH 50-566/80-07 AND 50-567/80 INSPECTION REPORT -

RESPONSE TO INFRACTION The subject letter dated April 24, 1980, cited TVA with one deficiency in accordance with 10 CFR 2.201.

Enclosed is our response to that deficiency.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with D. L. Lambert at FTS 854-2581.

Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY M

. M. Mills, Manag r Nuclear Regulation and Safety l

Enclosure Mr. Victor Stello, Jr., Director (Enclosure) cc:

Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 80g1 y Qyh An Equal Opportunity Employer

-Q OFFICLEgg s

ENCLOSURE w

YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 RESPONSE TO DEFICIENCY 566/80-07-01 AND 567/80-07-01 Deficiency As required by Criterion XVII of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, and implemented by PSAR Section 17.lA.17, " Sufficient records shall be maintained to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality."

Contrary to the above, records generated by the batch plant are inaccurate on pour number Al-Pr and Al-J1.

On pour number Al-Pr, records produced by the batch plant recorder are inaccurate in that batch times are unreadable, curves showing batch ingredient quantities begin several increments above the zero reference line. On pour number Al-J1 the recorded water contents for test number 1302 and 1304 are not compatible with the recorded slump tests.

Corrective Action TVA's review of the recorder charts for contrete pours Al-P3 and Al-J1 showed that the date and time printed by the automatic printer were illegible for a significant part of the shift.

However, the date and approximate time could be determined from the mixing plant records.

The problem was due to dirty filters on purge air blowers and a faulty solenoid valve on the printer.

TVA's corrective action was to replace the filters and clean the solenoid valve. We are now getting clear printing.

The scale lines are printed onto the chart paper by an automatic printer during operation.

The printer rolls have become worn and cause faint lines.

At present, the quantities can be determined by interpolation. New printer rolls have been ordered and should eliminate the problem completely.

The rezeroing problem has been investigated by TVA instrumentation engineers and is primarily restricted to the water, AEA, and WRA.

The ingredients are released into the mixer slowly, and the recorder pins sometimes fail to rezero because of excessive pin pressure and the loss of pin momentum.

The heavy pin pressure was to keep the pins from " jumping" off the chart because of plant vibration and was apparently excessive.

4 The failure to rezero causes only an apparent error and is being investigated further. TVA's corrective action was to optimize the pin pressure and instruct operators and inspectors to monitor and rezero if required.

The recorded water contents for test numbers 1302 r.:.o 1304 do not correlate with the slump test for concrete pour Al-J1.

At tu; *tme of this pour, the procedure was to take one aggregate moisture content test per shif t and was in compliance with General Construction Specification G-2 and QCI 204 RS.

l A close correlation between slump and water content would not be obtained from one aggregate moisture test per shift.

The change in moisture content

~

of the aggregate causes a change in the water required to maintain correct slump.

.(

  • ,*. ~..

E Steps Taken to Avoid Further Recurrence Proper preventive maintenance will be performed to prevent a recurrence in the lack of quality in printing of records produced by the batch I;,

plant recorder.

To prevent a recurrence of the rezeroing problem, TVA will investigate the plant for any excessive vibration and monitor the pin closely to k' ep the pressure optimized.

General Construction Specification QCI 204 R6 requires a moisture content

. test every two hours,'and a closer correlation will be obtained.

Date of Full Compliance Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant will be in full compliance by July 8, 1980.

I i

f B

A a.

8

^

4C, 4

.....-