ML19347F077

Forwards Revised Land Use Info for App I Evaluation.Info re-verified 810306

ML19347F077
Person / Time
Site:	Summer
Issue date:	05/08/1981
From:	Nichols T SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO.
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8105150210
Download: ML19347F077 (14)

Text

south CAROLINA ELECTRIC a GAS COMPANY post omcc som re.

CotumeiA, SOUTH CARouMA 29218 T. C. Nicwots, J n.

we en....... cnew=

May 8, 1981 hvettaa 0ernanous Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Subject:

Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Docket No. 50/395 Revised Environmental Information

Dear Mr. Denton:

As requested by Mr. Edvard F. Branagan, Jr., South Carolina Electric and Cas Company provides revised land use information for /ppendix I evaluation.

This information was reverified on March 6, 1981. Also enclosed is a draft map of existing radiological monitoring locations for both NRC required and other non-required but existing sampling sites. This map's blue overlay (the distance annular rings) are incorrectly located and is in the process of being corrected.

Should you require further information, please let us know.

Very truly yours, T. C. Nichols, Jr.

WRB:RBC:TCN:rh cc:

V. C. Summer G. H. Fischer

-T.

C. Nichols, Jr.

D. A. Nauman W. A. Williams, Jr.

-R.

B. Clary A. R. Koon A. A. Smith i

J. B. Knatts, Jr.

J. L. Skolds, Jr.

B. A. Bursey J. Ruoff O. S. Bradham 1

H. N. Cyrus H. E. Yocom K. Turner (D&M)

ISEG NPCF l

File 81053,5 g go,.

A

RE-VERIFIED 3/6/81 - BY:

S. SUMMER 1980 CENSUS l

Distance (Miles) 500 eft.

BEEF MILK SECTOR GARDEN CATTLE (f)

GOAT (f)

COW (f)

NOTES North 4.2 i

NNE 3.5 3.7 (20)

NE 1.9 3.5 (20)

ENE 1.7 3.7 (20)

East 1.2 ESE 1.5 4.0 ( 20) 1.7 (5) 1.7 (1)

Goats not milked Cow milked, On Feed

'SE 2.7 2.4 (20)

SSE 2.5 5.7 (3) 1 Milking l

S:uth 3.7 3.6 (47) l SSW 3.0 3.8 ( 10) 3.0 (2)

Not Milking i

SW 2.6 2.6 (45)

WSW 2.7 4.9 (40)

We:t 2.2 2.2 (12)

WNW 4.0 5.7 (30)

NW 3.9 3.9 (4) 3.9 (1)

Cow Milked, but on I

Feed NNW 2.9 2.9 (25) 2.9 (10)

Not Milking l

r:

~

,)

TABLE 204-1 1

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRO:QtENTAL MONITORING PROGRAN VIRGIL C. SQ{MER NUCLEAR STATION Page 1 of.10 e

Sample Locations Exposure Pathway Criteria for Selection of Sampling and Loca-Type and Frequency of and/or Sample Sample Number and Location Collection Frequency tion (l) Mi/Dir Analysis AIRBORNE I.

Particulates A 3 Indicator samples to Continuous sampler 2

1.1 SW Gross beta following be taken at locations operation with 5

1.3 SE filter change; Monthly (in different sectors) weekly collection.

10 2.4 NNE composite _ (by location) beyond but as close r.o.

for gamma isotopic.

the exclusion boundary.

as practicable where the highest offsite sectoral ground level concentrations are anticipated.(2)

B 1 Indicator sample to be 6

1.1 ESE taken in the sector be-yond but as close to the exclusion boundary as practicable correspond-ing to the residence having the highest anticipated offsite ground level concentration or dose. 2)

I0)

C 1 Indicator sample to be 14 5.2 W 4

taken at the location of l

oneofthedairiesmos[2)(4) likely to be affected.

'I

1 g

.[ %,

,/]

- [ *N

['N 4

t,_

v.s

a. /

TABLE 204-l- (Continued)

Page 2 of 10 Sample Locations Exposure Pathway Criteria'for Selection of Sampling and Locag)

Type and Frequency of and/or Sample Sample Number and Location Collection Frequency tion Mi/Dir Analysis

AIRBORNE, D 2 Control samples to be 17 24.7 SE (continued) taken at locations at least 10 air miles from 16 28.0 W the site and not in the 1

most prevalent wind directions.(2)

II.

Radioiodine A 3 Indicator samples to Con".inuous sampler 2

1.1 SW Camma isotopic screening be taker; at. two loca-cperation with weekly 5

1.3 SE of all five indicators tions as given in I.A cannister collection.

10 2.4 NNE with conjunctive screen-above.

ing of the two controls.

If screening is positive,

' each sample will be sub-jected to isotopic analysis for iodine.

B 1 Indicator sample to 6

1.1 ESE.

he taken at the lo-cation as given in I.B above.

4 C 1 Indidator sample to be 14 5.2 W.

taken at the location as 1

given in I.C above.

D 2 Control samples to be 17 24.7 SE taken at locations similar in nature to A-C 16 28.0 W l

above.

9 m

a

l TABLE 204-1 (Continu;d)

' P ge 3 cf 10_

Exposure Pathway Criteria for Selection of Sampling and Sample Locations Type and Frequency of' and/or Sample Sample Number and Location, Collection Frequency Location _Mi/Dir Aralysis

AIRBORNE, (continued)

III. Direct A.

5 Indicator samp1'es to Monthly exchange.(5) p.s 2, 5, 6, 10, Gamma dose monthly (5) be taken at the loca-Two or more dosi-and 14 tions as given in I.A meters at each through D above.

location.

B.

3 Additional indicator 1

1.3 E samples to be taken in 4

1.2 NW sectors different from 8

1.3 ENE III.A above, beyond but e

as close to the exclu-sion boundary as practicable.

C.

Control samples to be 16 28.0 W taken at the locations 17 24.7 SE as given at I.D above.

D.

1 Additional control 18 16.5 S sample to be taken at a location as set forth in I.D above E.

Additional Sites 3

.8 WSW' 7

1.7 E 9

2.6 NE 11-3.6 NNE 3

12 4.3 N 13 2.9 NNW 15 2.3 SSW 19 17.9 ESE 20 22.0 NW Accident Evaluation (7). Quarterly exchange.(5) 41 3.7 S

' Cades dose quarterly.

F.

Quarterly Exchange Two or more dosi-42 3.6 SSW

-l Program meters at each 43 4.7 SW location.

44 2.3 WSW 45 5.4 WSW 46 3.7 WNW 47 1.0 NW

)

i

!l TABLE 204-1 (Continued)

P:ge 4 cf 10

' Exposure Pathway -

Criteria for Selection,of Sampling and Sample Lc, cations' Type and Frequency of and/or Sample Sample Number and Location Collection Frequency Location Mi/Dir

• Analysis

AIRBORNE, (Continued)

'III. Direct F. (Continued) 48-2.4 NW 49 4.6 NNW 50 5.6 N 51 5.6 N 52 4.3 NNE 53 3.6 NE' 54 2.2 ENE

.55 3.2 E

.56 2.0 ESE

~57 2.7 SE 58 2.4.SSE,

59 2.1 SSE

, 60 5.7 WSW WATERBORNE IV.

Surface A.

1 Indicator sample-to Time composite samples-21(3)( 0.2.7 SSE Gama isotopic with Water be taken at a location with collection every quarterly composite-(by which allows for mixing month (corresponds to location) to be analyzed and dilution.in the USG'co nuous sampling for tritium.(7) ultimate receiving site).

river.

e h

t o

a n

r--w-v-

T

l o) n.

n q2.-

O.-

n C

..t TABLE *'204-1 (Continu:d) pagh 5 of 10

' Sample Locations Exposure Pathway Criteria for Selection of Sampling and Loca-Type and Frequency of

~

tion (1) Mi/Dir Analysis' and/or Sample Sample Number and Location Collection Frequency 22(3) 12-15 M i

WATERBORNE, B 1 Control sacple to be (continued) taken at a location on the receiving river, suffi-ciently far upstrease such that no effects of pumped otorage operation are

~

anticipated.

17 24.7 S-C 1 Indicator sample from 5

location immediately upstream of the nearest downstream municipal water supply D 1 Indicator sample to be Crab sampling 23(3)

<1 E As in V above.

1 4

taken in the upper reser-monthly (5) i voir of the pumped storage facility.

24(3) 4.7 N y

E 1 Indicator sample to be taken in the upper reser-voir's non-fluctuating recreational area.

18(3) 16.5 S y

F 1 Control sample to be taken at a location on a separated unaffected watershed reservoir.

grab 26 Onsite Gamma isotopic and V.

Ground Water A 2 Indicator samp1'es to Quarterly (7) 27 Onsite tritium analyses 1

4 be taken within the ex-sampling quarterly.(7) clusion boundary and in

/

the direction of poten-l tiall,y affected ground water supplies.

\\

I j n

i :

n n

n n

n' TABLE 204-1 %.sContinuzd)

P ga 6 of 10 j

Sample Locations Expoaure Pathway Criteria for Selection of Sampling and Loca-Type and Frequency of and/9r Satapla Sample Nmaber and Locacion

• Collection Frequency tion (1) Mi/Dir Analysis WATERBORNE, B 1 Control sample from an (continued) unaffected loc 4 tion.

16 28.0 W 1

VI.

Drinking A 1 Indicator esmple from Monthly rab Water nearby public ground sampling 5) 28 1.3 ESE Honthly(5) samma isotopic and gross Bet. 7gnalyses 1

.;ater. supply source.

and quarterly ' tritium 4

analyses B 1 Indicator (finished Monthly grab 17-24.7 S water) sample from the sampling (5) 5 nearest downstream water supply.

IhGESTION

' VII.* Milk (5)

A 1 Indicatar sample to Semi-monthly when 14(4) 5.2 W cammaisotopicandI-gI 1

analysis semi-monthly 1

be taken at the location animals on when animals are o$,g 4-Pasture -

monthly p,,gy,,;. monthly (5 of one of the dairies other times.(5) he likel )t Si other times most affected.

16 28.0 W B 1 Control sample to be 1

taken at the location of a dairy 10-20 miles dis-tant and not in the most prevalent wind direction.(2)

C 1 Indicator grass (for-Monthly when available(5) 6 1.'1 ESE Gamma Isotopic l

1 4

age) sample to be taken at cne of the locations beyond but as close to the exclusion boundary as practicable where the highest offsite sectoral' ground level concentra- )

tions are anticipated.(2

t

+

TABLE. 204 (Continued)-

Page 7 of 10 Sample Locations Exposure Pathway Criteria for Selection of Sampling and

. Loca g Type and Frequency of and/or Sample Samole Number and Location Collection Frequency tion Mi/Dir Analysis I)

INGESTION, D 1 In,!icator grass (for-14 5.2 W 4

(continued) age) s' ample to be taken at the location of VIII.A above when animals are on pasture.

E 1 Control grass (forage) sample to be, taken at the location of VIII.-B above.

16 28.0 W VIII.

Food A 1 Indicator sample to be Annually at the 6

1.1 ESE Gamma isotopic on edible Products taken at a nearby garden approximate median portion. Radioiodine on 1

likely to be affected.

harvest time for green leafy vegetables.

the area.

Samples, if available, will 4

include:

green leafy, fruit, and grain.

B 1 Control sample for the 18( )

16.5 S same foods taken at a j

location at least 10 miles distant and not in the

'most prevalent wind di-rection.

) collec-23(3)

~ '

IX.

Fish A 1 Indicator sample to be Semi-annual 0.3-5 Gamma isotopic on edfble 1

taken at a location in tion of the following portions semi-annually 4

the upper reservoir.

specie types if available :

bass, bream, crappie; catfish, carp; forage fish (shad).

t e

4 s-

r e'

e i

o

+,

n TABLE 204-1 (Continued)

Page 8 of 10 5

Sample Locations Exposure Pathway Criteria for Selection of Sampling and Loca ype and Frequency of 1) and/or Sample Sample Number and Location Collection Frequency tion Mi/Dir Analysis INGESTION, B 1 Indicator sample to be

~ 21( }

1-3' l'

(continued) taken at a location in the lower reservoir C 1 Indicator sample to be 24(3) 4-5 N 1

taken at a location in the upper reservoir's non-fluctuating recreational area.

\\

1 4

D 1 Control sample to be 22 12-15 NNW.

1 taken at a location on the receiviub "iver, sufficiently far up-stream such that no effects of pumped storage operation are anticipated.

AQUATIC I)

}

X. Sediment A 1 Indicator sample to be Semi-annual grab 23 0.3-4 Gamma isotopic 1

taken at a location in sample (9) 4 the upper reservoir.,

1 0

I t

e i

f 3 i 1;

e a.-

o p;

q~.

m.

M g

Page 9 of 10 TABLE'204.(Continued)

Sample Locations Exposure Pathway Criteria for Selection of Tsmpling and Loca7y)

Type and Frequency of and/or Sample Sample Number and Location Collection Frequency tion Mi/Dir Analysis 1QUATIC B 1 Indicator sample to be 24(3) 4-5 N.

1 (continued) taken in the upper reser-voir's non-fluctuating recreational area.

C 1 Indicator sample to be 21(3) 1-3 y

taken on the shoreline of the lower reservoir.

22(3) 15 1

D 1 Control sample to be taken in receiving river, sufficiently far upstream such that no effects of pumped storage operation are anticipated.

4 (1) Location numbers refer to Figures 6.1-3 and 6.1-4.

( ) Sample site locations are based on the meteorological analysis for,the period of record as pres'ented in

~ ~ ~ ~

Chapters 5 and 6.

(3) Though generalized areas are noted'for simplicity of sample site enumeration, airborne, water and sediment' I

sampling is dane at the same location whereas biological sargling sites are generalized areas in order to reasonably at e availability of samples.

1 1

t 4-

7 f\\

- O

. h.

9

\\~j i

g '.,

i.

i.

b,-

s Page 10 of 10 TABLE 204-1 (Continued) 4 b) Milking animal and garden survey results will be analyzed annually.' Should the survey indicate new dairying activity of a significant nature (5 or more cows milking) in a quadrant (s) other than W or NW and closer'than 4

5-7 miles, the owners shall be contacted with regard to a contract for supplying sufficient samples.

If contractural arrangements can be made, the site (s) will be added for additional milk sampling.

(5) Not to exceed 35 days.

(0) Time composite samples are samples which are collected with equipment capable of collecting an aliquot at s

time intervals which are short (e.g. hourly) relative to the compositing period.-

( ) At least once per 100 days.

~

(8) At least once per 18 days.

~

(9) At least once per 200 days.

NOTE: Deviations from this sampling schedule may occasione.lly be necessary if sample media are unobtainable due to hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability, insufficient sample size, malfunctions of auto-matic sampling or analysis equipment and other legitimate reasons.

If specimens are unobtainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, every effort shall be made to complete corr,ective action prior to the' end of the next sampling period. Deviations from sampling-analyses schedule will be described in the

~

annual report.

g t

t 4

k 9

9 4

m

1

.I m'

a o.

o.

on o.-

o

.\\..-

w s

i i

TABLE 204-2 s.

DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS MEDIA / DETECTION CAP /BILITIES i

(LLD)(

Lower Limit of Detection Airborne Particulate Fish, Meat Water

.of Gas or Poultry Milk

. Vegetation Sediment Analysis (pC1/l)

(pCi/m3)

(pCi/kg, wet)

(pCi/1)

(pCi/kg, wet)

(pCi/kg, dry)

C gross beta 2( }

(1 x 10-2) 4-3 2000 (1000)( )

g 54 15 130 g

59,

30 260 7

f8,60 15 130 Co 65,

30 260 7

95 15 Zr-Nb 131 1

(7 x 10 )

1 60 4

7 134,137 15(10)( ), 18 (1 x 10-2) 130 15 80, '

150 Cs 140,_g 15 15 3

Direct TLD measurements should have detection sensitivities approaching 10 mrem /yr.

g (1)The nominal lower limit of detection is defined in HASL 300 (Rev. 8/74), pp. D-v8-01, 02, 03 at the 95%

confidence level. The LLD levels are decay corrected to the end of the total sampling period. The LLD i

for radionuclides analyzed by gamma spectrometry will vary according to the number of radionuclides en-countered in environmental samples. These LLD levels will be used as minimum criteria for objectives for instrumentation and analytical procedure selection.

( }LLD for Drinking Water i

( )LLD for Green Leafy' Vegetables

~.

D e

e

.,,M % [.

l

!:,i!I si s=

,,,,,..s s,0,3. '.

• 6...m.09 5 Cn.

.o j

fjj s

p" 4

y 350 f.

9..

-x

/.

v ia 9

'./

0

. ce 351

'lll,.

F r>

t*n 49 C h.

D' \\

Y 3

@ mN3 -

3 e

s.

l

. ]:

{u-,

4 T,-

I

/"

q J.

!-i p*

St Marks b

Ch.

• 9 G

c r

97 i

• =

33i N

s '-

y New Hope

~4*,

It

! k:

i.

. < r.

~

t m.

' s 494 4e i

,REEs CREEK

. g.,

, 33,..

49s 3

J'

+

x FAIRFIELD t N475,000

'Y

., POWERHOtf 176

. ~..

s-ss gg",je.-,;.. 1'.*

.y,

+.

x c

,/ -

m I

S.

./ I4 270 -

N 30 (0)

.,. A t James,

(A,D,I,0)

PARR S

7

_RESERv01R '

7jg a

.,Ch 97 N

N' iM

• • • =.. * *a.

-o

- 4 4-gg

=

5,

=

setnichem E}p

' ]..'. c.

t.,d.,I![.

3,46-Victory Cn.

4

-2g

.d Ch

( $$

0 l

h m' Cannons sen _'e

. u = M Q.

• g4 d.: " '

+.,

G., m.,.

28

-l..

k g r.,

.s-3.<

/

d/-

o

/

33 g

sope 3

POM ARI A g

~,

w l

k I

Cn t

f 299

• p k

por 230 g c

,n

/

--s 170 *

~

+

..... + 'g x

't.s... a,,.v

.. a., r.

',; ps

/

s:...

e V

7.

176 3

e l

b.3*

/* i

%<44 r

.I J

' ' 78 s0.

.+

TI.

Q I !

'g.

f,. *.,*

mp

..W.

20?

o*

OSt Johns e

C. -

<. ?

"M.'

..if s,-

_ \\,

M. 7 a*

, 33 fr m4

..,, y +~

n

.,,,. - (e

d. h p,., r

• [o N$.' h i

'?

k#'

• [-

3-r s

x. q. /,

ym

.m

,g

. L ufth Y

I Sgmyg J

0: :

tDCAT1 341

• E.7 b

/

44,

• o N

U e,s

/

=

' ' [: [M' g *.*s-f' M.(..... q t-f-

g :d.i. g

h ( [,'

t-h"Sen.

I a

s

• , won TICE LLO o'

e l-

+

...i.!" !.!..'

g.

"""g*"a l

jij u-

/

er' cd J

ii::::

i.

a

~

c s

/

5AWY. 99215 i.:i i: -

t g

l::.:.:

/

..W.:

f,.

a RELOCATION

.)p.

f,-

\\. :.

-.. - :q

/

sh

g:..::i.:

j r

s,

,,es u

. [::..:.

'V.

[,

i i

- *,s

• D

a.........d:.:..

B3sco.ns

use

'u g o#.*.

s

,;.;iyg-

+.cnone

.i:--

" :::./."" '

%s i s.b

\\

id Bra k 7n

• c n. "..

. :::::/::::::.:::

e: v :

,. ' t me 4

s

- :O

,O

. River i:.. :i ii}i...."/:i '

.;,Q *J 6

70 f A5 **/

• 8 ch

• T

.:i,"i;*iil':i'i:{[::

?? ' ;,. 709

• 7. s 78 '

/

47

: :P.:'

4 475,000 s

Dy

m 1"

2,

/

f f('

-f.J en kin sviHe g

N ( k. jf

-. 3TATI Sch.

747 0

2 54 56t. Barnabas 1 4(A,DL T. '

90 -Og 4 LEGEM 3(D) 2 3.,

s.

28(W)

\\

6 #*

' 15 P.91M ARY SAMPLE TYPES

\\'

A,D,I,0) l x

=

_A = AIR PARTICUL ATE SAMPLE SITE f

Nono,5

(

(A,D,I)

t..

)

\\

D = DIRECT (TLD) SAMPLE SITE (MONTHLY) i

\\( A,D,I)., h I : AIRBORNE RADIOIODINE SAMPLE SITE EXCLUSION = -

q Jo' W = WATER SAMPLING LOCATION OW

( A,0,D) f >S '

O=OTHER c,.

93, South Carolina Electric 8 Gas Co.

M

• JENKINSVILLE PAHH bg 1.1 V..gil C. Summer Nuclear Station

' A DI f.5 O-

.f 16 57

.M oridh 9

FAS 58 h.

9 = QUARTERLY TLD(D) SAMPLING LOCATIONS

%\\

y

?!3 F a

.)

Roc k HiH ch.

,1 35 l

R ADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM LOCAL INDICATOR SAMPLE SITES E

6 ALSTON SOUTHggy \\

'\\

kf.,n N450 OOO

'g

_ __ i' %

200R OR8 EL

(

g~

y ;.

6 s

nn t.

~

gi f

w_

(

e i

FIGURE

6. l - 2

__