|
|
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | number = ML20005E036 | | | number = ML20005E036 |
| | issue date = 12/01/1989 | | | issue date = 12/01/1989 |
| | title = Addendum 4 to Crdr, Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Rept. | | | title = Addendum 4 to Crdr, Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Rept |
| | author name = | | | author name = |
| | author affiliation = HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. | | | author affiliation = HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:; | | {{#Wiki_filter:}} |
| Addendum 4 ;
| |
| y 7tfy tg ; m;Jegpg727$eview z l Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution ;
| |
| Report :
| |
| T
| |
| ~
| |
| . . . - - . - ~ ~'11 --. ~ ---. .. . -. - -.. lTl- - -
| |
| HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY
| |
| | |
| 7
| |
| < nouston CONTROL ROOM
| |
| * G DESIGN REVIEW s
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HED RESOLUTION REPORT REVISION LDC Revision Pages No. Date Description Affected 0 04/15/85 Initial Issue 1 08/12/85 General Revision i, vii, 2 4, 2-5 A 2, A 5, A 6, A-8, A 9, A 10, A 11, A 12, B 3, B 4,
| |
| ()
| |
| B 5, B 8, 3 9, B 18, B 19,B 25, B 29, D 5, D 6 Addendum 12/22/86 Initial Issue N/A No,'1 Addendum 11/23/87 Complete Revision of N/A No. 2 Addendum No. 1 Addendum 09/30/88 Complete Revision of N/A No. 3 Addendum No. 2 Addendum 12/01/89 Complete Revision of N/A No. 4 Addendum No. 3 i
| |
| O ttects 1 i STP56 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| l nouston CONTROL ROOM 0 }*TM Powsmco.
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW I
| |
| HED RESOLUTION REPORT
| |
| )
| |
| ADDC;DUM 4 )
| |
| )
| |
| ')
| |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS I Section Title Egg,t t i
| |
| REVISION LOG i TABLE OF CONTENTS 11 l LIST OF TABLES iii LIST OF FIGURES iii 3 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS iv l
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| vi PREFACE viii
| |
| | |
| ==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
| |
| 11 ,
| |
| 1.1 GEFERAL COMMENTS 11 1.2 OBJECTIVE l-1 1.3 METHOD OF REPORTING RESOLUTIONS 11 2.0 LISTING OF HED RESOLUTIONS 21 CATEGORY A A1 CATEGORY B B1 CATEGORY C C1 CATEGORY D D1 11oo2s 1 it STP56 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| )
| |
| i nousTou CONTROL ROOM 0 l*H G
| |
| Powan co.
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW J
| |
| HED RESOLUTION REPORT l
| |
| ADDENDUM 4 )
| |
| IbBLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES l
| |
| Table Title Eagt 21 HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED 2+5 I RES0WTION REPORT ,
| |
| 22 HEDs IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED 2 14 i RES0WTION REPORT r
| |
| LIST OF FIGURES
| |
| ! Ficure Title P1 STP CRDR MAJOR REPORTS b
| |
| i lO 1100281 iti STP56 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| l Houston CONTROL ROOM
| |
| (} lGHMG PCHWER CO.
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW HED RESOLUTION REPORT ADDENDUM 4 l
| |
| ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ,
| |
| I AFW Auxiliary Teedwater i ASP Auxiliary Shutdown Panel glI ATWS Anticipated Transient Without Scram BAT Boric Acid Tank CCW Component Cooling Water 1 Cont Control, Controller -
| |
| CR Control Room l CRDR Control Room Design Review l CRS Control Room Survey CRT Cathode Ray Tube 1 CSF Critical Safety Function CVI Containment Ventilation Isolation dB(A) Decibels (A. Scale)
| |
| DC Direct Current O EAB ECW Electrical Auxiliary Building Essential Cooling Water I E0P Emergency Operating Procedure (s) I ERFDADS Emergency Response Facilities Data Acquisition and Display l System (SPDS is a portion of ERFDADS)
| |
| ESF. Engineered Safety Features l ESFAS Engineered Safety Features Actuation System J FW Feedwater CPM Callons per Minute ,
| |
| HED Human Engineering Discrepancy HF Human Factors HL&P Houston Lighting & Power Company HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning RX Heat Exchanger IR Intermediate Range kV Kilovolt LCO Limiting Condition for Operation LOOP Loss of Offsite Power MCC Motor Control Center MCO Main Construction Office MG Motor Cenerator MVAR Megavar MSR Moisture Separator Reheater NI Nuclear Instrumentation NIS Nuclear Instrumentation System
| |
| ['')
| |
| v NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission s tec2s 1 iv STP56 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| I i
| |
| i j
| |
| nousTon CONTROL ROOM
| |
| {} f*MG POWER CO.
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW l
| |
| l HED RESOLUTION REPORT ADDENDUM 4 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ,
| |
| (Continued) ;
| |
| NSF Normal Safety Tunction OER Operating Experience Review j P&ID Piping and Instrumentation Diagram '
| |
| PORV Power Operated Relief Valve )
| |
| PR Power Range j Proteus Plant Computer ,
| |
| QDPS Qualified Display Processing System !
| |
| RCB Reactor Containment Building RCS Reactor Coolant Systen I RHR Residual Heat Removal RWST Refueling Water Storage Tank SFTA System Function and Task Analysis !
| |
| SG Steam Generator O'
| |
| SCFP Steam Generator Feed Pump -
| |
| SI Safety Injection SIS Safety Injection System SPDS Safety Parameter Display System ,
| |
| SR Source Range g STP South Texas Project V Volt V6V Verification and Validation VCT Volume Control Tank O
| |
| 110028 1 y STP56 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i
| |
| ,, Houston CONTROL ROOM
| |
| - UGHMG DESIGN REWEW G) a i
| |
| rowan co. 1 1
| |
| I HED RESOLUTION REPORT ADDENDUM 4
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| j i
| |
| This addendum to the HED Resolution Report summarizes the results of the resolution of Category A, B C, and D human engineering discrepancies (HEDs) in response to human engineering observations generated as a result of the g ;
| |
| following activities:
| |
| : a. The Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) validation
| |
| : b. The disposition of HEDs that were not complete at the time of the initial HED Resolution Report
| |
| : c. The evaluation of Category E HEDs -
| |
| : d. Miscellaneous CRDR human factors work
| |
| : e. Dispositions where it was determined that revision, clarification, or additional information was necessary
| |
| : f. The SPDS Man in the Loop Validation The E0P validation was performed at the South Texas Project simulator, located in the training facility, during May 1986. This effort and the results are described in the EOP Validation Report.
| |
| Disposition of HEDs not complete at the time of the initial HED Resolution Report (dated April 15, 1985, as revised August 12, 1985) and evaluation of nearly all of the Category E HEDs have been performed. Various other remaining CRDR tasks, as shown in the Executive Summary and its addenda, have ttocas t vi STP56 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| I HOUS' ton CONTROL ROOM IOHTING OgSlgy_ ggyjgy POWER CO. !
| |
| l HED RESOLUTION REPORT 1
| |
| ADDENDUM 4 1 his l also been completed. Disposition of the HEDs resulting from these evaluations and tasks is included in this addendum. l HEDs are also identified by project operations, engineering, and startup l personnel. Disposition of HEDs identified through this avenue is included in ;
| |
| this addendum.
| |
| The SPDS Man-in the Loop Validation was performed at the South Texas- Projec simulator during November 1987.- Disposition of HEDs developed during this i effort is included in this addendum.
| |
| O V This addendum summarizes the disposition of HEDs open at the time of the initial HED Resolution Report and those HEDs developed after that report. i l
| |
| Addendum 4 supersedes Addendum 3 in its entirety. l *
| |
| ..O l 11002s 1 - vii STf.M . 12/01/89 >
| |
| _ _ _ u-
| |
| | |
| R,
| |
| . HousTou CONTROL ROOM IGHTINO DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HED RESOLUTION REPORT ADDENDUM 4 PREFACE The control room deugn review (CRDR) of the South Texas Project (STP)
| |
| Electric Generating Station was started in September 1982. This re. view was performed by Torrey Pines Technology for Huuston Lighting & Pcwer Company 1
| |
| (HIAP) with Bechtel Energy Corporation (Bechtel) acting as agent. j l
| |
| The program plan was presented to the NRC at the STP main control panel mock-up in October 1982. The basic review work for operator experience review, system function and task analysis, and control room survey was completed in October 1982. In November 1982, the Management Team put a hold on CRDR activities, and authorized a design study to address mounting evolutionary engineering changes and correct discrepancies with the NUREG 0700 guideli6es.
| |
| In November 1982, a decision was made by H14P to completely relayout six main control panels and upgrade the remaining four based on the design study. This redesign effort was required to accommodate design changes resulting from plant design evolution and Regulatory Guide 1.97 requirements and to correct'
| |
| . discrepancies with NUREG 0700. In December 1982 the Management Team selected one of five alternatives studied for design implementation.
| |
| The mock up was revised considering the 441 identified HEDs and evolutionary engineering changes. As the Bechtel layout engineers advanced the layouts of the ten panels, Torrey Pines Technology engineers reviewed the rework for correction of known discrepancies and compliance with good human factors principles. The redesign effort on the main control panels was completed in April 19B3, The NRC performed an in-progress audit in May 1983, after R ich the panel vendor was provided with firm layout drawings.
| |
| 110028-1 viii STP56 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i i
| |
| - HousioN CONTROL ROOM i~ L'GHTING DESIGN REVIEW. j Ns)' &
| |
| PCWVER oO. i HED KESOLUTION REPORT .]
| |
| ADDENDUM 4 I
| |
| l The NRC audit comments required the addition of several special studies to those alresdy in progress,1.g. , demarcation and hierarchical labeling. The most significant addition, the evaluation of specified parameters, resulted in a net reduction of 51 panel meters. The extensive relayout required a repeat of the system function and task analysis with verification and walk-through/
| |
| talk through validation. Likewise, a specially structured control room review and human factors. review of the corrective measures for all Category A and representative Category B discrepancies were performed. The demarcation and hierarchical labeling studies resulted in continued upgrading of the mock up.
| |
| The completion of the panel relayout allowed the design of the annunciator system consistent with the relocations of many systems and subsystems, and a O reduction of active windows from 1055 to 642.
| |
| gj
| |
| 'Following the completion of these major efforts, HL&P has continued tae CRDR program, including resolution of human engineering deficiencies identified, using Bechtel and Torrey Pines Technology as required.
| |
| The documentation for this program was necessarily extensive in view of its design development nature. Documentation describing the work performed during the CRDR is summarized below and in Figure P-1:
| |
| : 1. Program Plan - Defines the initial plan for performing the CRDR during the plant's construction phase.
| |
| : 2. Criteria Report - Provides the detailed guidelines and basis for the CRDR and describes the interface between the control room and plant systems. This report also includes review procedures, plant conventions, and human factors data developed during the CRDR that
| |
| () will facilitate future control room modifications.
| |
| 1tce2s 1 ix
| |
| -STPS6 12/01/89 t_
| |
| | |
| i
| |
| . HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
| |
| {lGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HED RESOLUTION REPORT -
| |
| ADDENDUM 4 1
| |
| l
| |
| : 3. Operating Experience Review (OER) Report Describes the operations personnel review process, results, conclusions, and J recommendations of this task defined in-the Program Plan.
| |
| l
| |
| , 4. System Function and Task Analysis (SFTA) Report - Describes the I methodology, results, conclusions, and recommendations for this SFTA effort defined in the Program Plan.
| |
| : 5. Control Room Survey (CRS) Report - Describes the review process, results, conclusions, and recommendations of this task defined in 1 the Program Plan. This report also includes the final results and
| |
| ( dispositions for the human factors observations obtained from the OER and the SFTA.
| |
| : 6. Annunciator Report - De cribes the review process, results, conclusions, and recommendations of the annunciator review task defined in the Program Plan and the annunciator study guide.
| |
| : 7. Special' Studies Report - Describes details of miscellaneous studies performed as part of the CRDR. This includes the anthropometric study, the hierarchical labeling study, the demarcation study, evaluation of specified parameters, and many minor studies to resolve NRC audit comments.
| |
| : 8. Implementation Plan Report Summarizes the control panel design changes resulting from the implementation of Regulatory Guide 1.97 requirements, engineering design requirements, and preliminary observations of the CRDR design review team. It describes the reasons for major changes to the control panel layouts.
| |
| 110028 1 x STPS6 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| +
| |
| ' HOUSTON CONTROL ROO,4 Im
| |
| . \ J-'
| |
| L'OHTING -DESIGN REVIE'.V ;
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HED RESOLUTION REPORT ADDENDUM 4
| |
| : 9. SFTA Validation Report - Summarizes the second review required because of the extensive revisions made to the control panel layouts and also includes walk-through/ talk through exercises performed in the mock up area.
| |
| : 10. OER Validation Report - Summarizes the review made by operators to determine if the redesigned panels corrected reported operator concerns and evtluate if any new problems were created as a result
| |
| . of the corrective measures taken, i 1
| |
| : 11. CRS Validation Report - Summarizes the review made to' determine if i
| |
| -(s,/ the Category A and representative samples of the Category B HEDs were satisfactorily corrected and if any new problems were created.
| |
| : 12. Executive Summary Summarizes the CRDR results, conclusions, recommendations, and schedules for remaining work. Technical details are in the Operating Experience Review Report, the System Punction and Task Analysis Report, the Annunciator Report, the ,
| |
| Control Room Survey Report, the Special Studies Report, the Implementation Plan Report, and various validation reports.
| |
| : 13. Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report - Summarizes all Category A, B, C, and D HED resolutions (as of January 1,1986) .
| |
| 14 Executive Summary Addenda - Summarize the results and remaining work schedules of the CRDR program following the submittal of the Executive Summary Report. Addendum 1 showed progress as of April p)
| |
| (_ 15, 1985; Addendum 2 as of December 22, 1986; Addendum 3 as of 1tce28-1 xi STP56 12/01/89
| |
| _ry -
| |
| | |
| . - =- - . --_
| |
| HOUSTON- CONTROL ROOM
| |
| ,^ &, - }'?HT'NG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.-
| |
| i HED RESOLUTION REPORT ADDENDUM 4 November 23, 1987; and Addendum 4 as of September 30, 1988.
| |
| Addendum 5 shows progress as of December 1, 1989.
| |
| : 15. Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) Validation Report -
| |
| Summarizes the validation process used for the Emergency Operating 'l Procedures and the results as they involve the control pa.nels. .
| |
| This validation was conducted at the STF simulator during May 1986 using the draft EOPs.
| |
| : 16. Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report Addenda -
| |
| Summarize resolutions for Category A, B, C, and D HEDs identifiec af ter January 1,1986. Addendum i summarized the HED resolutions
| |
| , as of December 22, 1986; Addendum 2 as of November 23, 1987; and j Addendum 3 as of September 30, 1988. Addendum 4 summarizes the
| |
| .HED resolutions as of December 1, 1989. For clarity, each l addendum shows resolutions for HEDs identified after January 1, 1986, thus superseding the previous addendum in its entirety,
| |
| : 17. Program Plan Addendum - Identifies the STP CRDR Program Plan effective for the plant's operational phase.
| |
| D v
| |
| 11002s4 ' xii STP56 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| a' l HOUSTON tGHTING '
| |
| CONTROL ROOM p yggg y gg ypy y L
| |
| ;f T Ibh POWER CO.
| |
| 'q)
| |
| I L- .
| |
| : :l PLANNING 1
| |
| L
| |
| ~80 N l
| |
| , PortT -
| |
| n i
| |
| j i I!g l8 [ydj
| |
| /vvv/ '
| |
| 1).
| |
| %,_.. v%e N.
| |
| ASSESSMENT y h' s 3g !
| |
| IMPLEMENTATION EFFECTIVENESS g
| |
| * l g g. l
| |
| ,8 O -
| |
| STP CRDR MAJOR REPORTS Figure P 1 1
| |
| ..a.
| |
| | |
| u, - - . -
| |
| t i; .j
| |
| )
| |
| l m nouston- CONTROL ROOnt Q }*GHTING POWER CO.
| |
| DESIGN - REVIEW l
| |
| HED RESOLUTION REPORT j
| |
| ADDENDUM 4
| |
| | |
| ==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
| |
| | |
| 1.1 CENERAL COMMENTS l
| |
| The initial Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report was prepared to provide in one document a summary of the HEDs and their resolutions, as approved by the Project Review Team and Management Team involved in the CRDR of the South Texas Project. This addendum addresses the HEDs not complete at I the time of the initial HED Resolution Report and those developed as a result ~
| |
| of CRDR activities since that time. This addendum is prepared in a manner to I be consistent with the initial HED Resolution Report. !
| |
| 1~2 . OBJECTIVE l I
| |
| 1 The purpose of this addendum is to provide a structured reporting method for summarizing.the-resolutions of HEDs not completely resolved in the initial HED .
| |
| Resolution Report and HEDs developed subsequent to that report in the l
| |
| (- continuing program to apply human factors principles to the design of the control room.
| |
| i.
| |
| 1.3 METHOD OF REPORTING RESOLUTIONS
| |
| : The: Category A, B, C, and D HEDs and resolutions addressed by this addendum are shown in Section 2.
| |
| The schedules for completion of ongoing or remaining CRDR activities are i
| |
| - provided in the Executive. Summary Report Addenda, Section 5.0, Schedule.
| |
| O
| |
| : 11002s1- 11 STP57 -. 12/01/89.
| |
| | |
| 1 J
| |
| '', w L: . nousion . CONTROL ROOM -
| |
| 1 vO ~
| |
| L'GH a
| |
| G . DESIGN REVIEW' POWER CO.
| |
| I y HED RESOLUTION REPORT
| |
| , ADDENDUM 4 2.0 LISTING OF HED RESOLUTIONS
| |
| 'The HED resolution sheets are organized by category (A, B, C, and D) and each category is subdivided according to the NUREG 0700 Section 6 topics as ;
| |
| follows:
| |
| Workspace Communications Annunciator Controls Visual Displays
| |
| .n (j Labels and Location Aids ,
| |
| Computers Panel Layout Control / Display Integration Renumbering of some HEDs occurred in HED Resolutien Report Addendum 2, differing from Addendum 1 and the E0P Validation' Report. This renumbering ,
| |
| Lwas done to facilitate use of a single number (i.e., the HED number) instead of multiple sheet numbers to reference a single finding.
| |
| For ease in locating a particular HED, Tables 2-1 and 2 2 have been provided, listing respectively the HEDs identified since the initial HED Resolution
| |
| -Report and the HEDs identified in the initial HED Resolution Report for which additional information is provided herein. Revision bars are not shown in these tables where only the page number has changed. .
| |
| O 11002s.1 21 STP57- 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| , i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM i i jK'HY'NG DESIGN REVIEW. l
| |
| - POWER CO. ,
| |
| HED RESOLUTION REPORT ADDENDUM 4 Disposition notes are provided when several HEDs can be more effectively adoressed in one location, and are shown beginning on pages 2 3 for the l Qualified Display Processing System.
| |
| I O
| |
| . tv
| |
| 'l 1
| |
| 1 i
| |
| i U
| |
| isooms-i 22 STP57 12/01/89
| |
| ______:___-_=______-______ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . .
| |
| | |
| houston CONTROL ROOM L'GHT'NG DESIGN REVIEW
| |
| & Di$ POSITION NOTES ,
| |
| V' 1 POWER CO. l Computers N/A j
| |
| ' HF AREA HED CATEGORY l
| |
| NOTE DISPOSITION CPT-1 The Qualified Display Processing System (QDPS) is a .
| |
| microprocessor based system designed to perform several safety-related functions, as follows:
| |
| : 1. Data acquisition, processing, and qualified display for l post-accident monitoring
| |
| : 2. Date acquisition, display, and analog control for safe shutdown to address separation / isolation concerns for a postulated control room / relay room fire 1 1
| |
| I
| |
| .p Data acquisition and digital processing of steam generator v 3. l narrow range water level signals and primary coolant system i hot leg temperature signals for transmission to the protection system and for display I'
| |
| : 4. Safety grade control (and position indication, as required) of several safety related valves Design changes and resolutions to human engineering observations
| |
| * have been identified that involve modifications to the QDPS.
| |
| Because the QDPS is microprocessor based, these modifications involve z,oftware changes; these software changes require completion of a comprehensive verification and validation (V6V) effort.
| |
| The schedule for these design changes is discussed in the Executive Summary Addenda, Section 5.0, Item 22. Discussions of each HED resolution are provided below.
| |
| 1 11oo2s 1 2-3 STP57 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| , HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM y , LlGHTING gggqq y ggyjg y l '
| |
| DISPOSITION NOTES
| |
| '' POWER CO.
| |
| Computers N/A HF AREA HED CATEGORY N DISPOSITION NO.
| |
| HED-1022 The QDPS displays will be revised to consistently refer to steam (Cat. C)- line pressure as "SG PRESS", to use the correct abbreviation for g
| |
| " estimated", and to delete "c,c" from the cubiclo cooler representation on the display.
| |
| l HED 1027 Two minor inconsistencies (incorrect PORV label, incorrect
| |
| ,g '
| |
| (Cat. C) abbreviation) will be corrected at a later date.
| |
| HED 1041 QDPS displays.of tank levels which are Tech Spec parameters will (Cat. B) be revised to display the levels in gallons, rather than percent, A when the Tech Spec requirement is in gallons. This change will V allow direct comparison of the Tech Spec requirement and the ,
| |
| actual tank level. Information has been issued to the Operations l and Training Departments giving the conversion from percent to gallons for each tank, allowing use of QDPS to verify compliance with the Tech Spec. This information has been included in the operator requalification program.
| |
| HED 1126 Operator action points on the QDPS CSF displays will be revised to Cat. C) be consistent with the modifjestions being made on the SPDS CSF 'j displays. These changes will result in all operator action points on the QDPS CSF displays hav4.ng arrows and dasheo lines, with numerical vclues corresponding to t'5e potus trees. I O
| |
| 110028 1 24 STP57 12/01/89
| |
| =__=__________--_________-_____-___________________-__-___-_____-___-___-
| |
| | |
| f
| |
| )
| |
| N Houston CONTROL ROOM L)- - L',0HTlNO a
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| TABLE 2 1:
| |
| HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Zagg Title HED 1001 D 15 Switch Action After " Quick Release" HED 1002 B 18 Control Switch Action on Transfer Switch Panel ,
| |
| I HED 1003 B-19 Standby Diesel Cenerator Emergency Stop Capabilicy J HED 1004 A2 Feedback for CCW Flow to Reactor Coolant Pumps HED 1005 A 19 Safety Injection System Layout Train / Subsystem Differentiation HED 1006 A-10 CCW/ECW Pump Labeling Similarity HED 1007 A 11 Labels and Mimic for CCW System O HED 1008 A-12 Load Center Switches Used for ATWS Response HED 1009 A-6 Misleading Indication of Power Available to ESF Buses HED 1010 A3 First Out Windows Unreadable HED 1011- A4 Inadvertent Actuation of Annunciator Test Pushbutton HED 1012 B 56 Demarcation Color Pads for Panel CP010 Power Feeds to ESF Buses on Panel CP003
| |
| -HED 1013- B 23 Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Flow Recorder Scales HED 1014 B 57 Recorder Pen Sequence Reversed From Indi::e*.or Sequence HED 1015 C-17 Feedback for Status of Reactor Makeup System HED-1016 B-37 Part1'el Mimic Lines on Panel CP010 HED-1017 C-24 Incorrect Reflection of Charging Pump Valves on Panel CP004 HED-1018 C 18 Fredback for ESF Actuation Signal Reset
| |
| .p HED 1019 C-25 ESF Signal Block Switch Labeling d HED 1020 C 26 SI Power Lockout Switch Labeling 11002s 1 2-5 STP57 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| s p
| |
| Houston CONTROL ROOM Q. {'GHTING
| |
| ' POWER CO.
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW TABLE 2-1 (Continued)'
| |
| HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number EAgg Title )
| |
| HED 1021 C 27 SI Reset Switch Labeling HED 1022 C-38 QDPS/ERFDADS Display Abbreviations Display Revisions HED 1023 C-39 QDPS Display Abbreviations - Criteria Revisions HED 1024 C-40 Zero/ Low Flow Indications on QDPS HED 1025 C-19 Inconsistent Position Indication for QDPS-Controlled Valves 1
| |
| HED-1026 B 46 NIS Displays on QDPS and ERFDADS HED 1027 C-41 QDPS/ERFDADS Display Inconsistencies 7
| |
| HED 1028 D 19 Third Pen Visibility on Three Pen Recorders HED 1029 D-2 Controls Above 70 Inches HED-1030 B2 Glare from Meters HED-1031 C 15 Legend Pushbutton Label Inconsistencies HED 1032 C-20 Steam and Feedwater Headers Differential Pressure Determination HED 1033 B-47 Proteus and ERFDADS Use of Colors HED-1034 D-26 ERFDADS Normal and Critical Safety Function Designarors on Displays HED 1035 D-27 ERFDADS Keys - Differentiation of " Shifted" and "Unshifted" Functions HED-1036 C-42 Abbreviations on Computer Displays HED-1037 B 48 Clare on Computer CRTs HED 1038 C-43 Plant Computer Color Quality and Menu Listing Order
| |
| ~
| |
| FED 1039 D 28 Use of Periods on Computer Displays l
| |
| C-44 ERFTADS/ Plant Computer Labeling and Colors HED-1040 11002s 1 2-6 STP57.. 12/01/b>
| |
| .e
| |
| | |
| .. ~ _ _ .. _
| |
| F HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l(} "
| |
| {MMG POWER CO.
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW TABLE 2 1 (Continued)
| |
| HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Egg Title HED 1041 B 49 Tech Spec Level Presentation Inconsistencies HED 1042 B 50 Proteus Display Error HED 1043 C-67 Cross Loop Comparison of RCS Temperatures (T ,, T,,, T,, Delta-T)
| |
| HED-1044 B 59 VCT Pressure and Level Meters Differentiation ,
| |
| HED 1045' A 13 Demarcation Inadequate for SG Level Meters and P0S.V Controls HED 1046 B 38 Labels Inconsistent with Meters Identified ,
| |
| 'NJ
| |
| /
| |
| -\
| |
| HED 1047. B 51- ERFDADS Unit Overwritten by Data Quality Character HED 1048 B 52 ERFDADS Display Errors on Valve Status HED 1049 B 53 ERFDADS Display Error on RHR Flow Range .
| |
| l
| |
| - HED 1050 'B 54 Radiation Monitoring Information Not Datalinked to )
| |
| ERFDADS j HED 1051 B7 Bypass / Inoperable Indication - Phase A Isolation HED 1052 B-8 Bypass / Inoperable Indication - Main Steam Isolatien HED-1053 B-9 Bypass / Inoperable Indication - Safety Injection HED 1054 B-10 Bypass / Inoperable Indication - RHR Heat Exchanger Valves HED-1055 C-8 Abbreviations on ESF Status Monitoring System HED-1056 C9 Inconsistent / Incorrect Labels on ESF Status Monitoring System HED-1057 C-28 Labeling of AW Pump Turbine Trip Pushbutton
| |
| . HED 1058 C-29 Inconsistent Recorder Labels and Pen Labels for RCS
| |
| - g Temperature HED 1059 B 55 ERFDADS Display Error on Valve Numbers 1
| |
| 110028 1 2-7 STP57 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM.
| |
| Dp HOUSTON ,
| |
| ~ rb UGHMG DESIGN REVIEW .
| |
| l POWER CO.
| |
| TABLE 2-1 (Continued) )
| |
| HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT l
| |
| Number Egge Iillg l
| |
| HED 1060 C2 Air Velocities Above Limits HED 1061 B-3 Lighting Levels Outside Requirements HED 1062 B -l4 Inadequate Illumination Levels (Emergency Lighting) ,
| |
| l HED 1063 B5 Control Room Noise Levels HED 1064 C-45 ERFDADS Transfer Switch Position Descriptions HED-1065 C-46 ERFDADS and QDPS Displayed Values Differences HED 1066 B 11 Status Monitoring Not Provided After a LOOP p, HED-1067 B 12 Status Monitoring Alarms After LOOP for Components Not i.j Actuated HED-1068 C-10 Seismic Monitoring Annunciation-HED 1069 D 29 Color Meanings in Trend Graphs on ERFDADS HED 1070 C 47 SPDS Status Box Color Differentiation HED-1071 D-30 SPDS Keys - Differentiation on ERFDADS Keyboards HED-1072 C-48 SPDS CSF Displays - No Color Changes for Alarm Conditions HED-1073 D-31 Cooling coil and Heating coil Symbols on Computer Displays HED-1074 D-32 Data Presentation Order Difference Between QDPS and ERFDADS HED-1075 C-49 AFW Flow Offscale High Indication HED 1076 D 20 Tech Spec Flow Value Readability on Meter 3cale hen-1077 C-30 Demarcation / Labeling on HVAC Panel CP022 HED-1078 C-31 Labels for Power Source Identification PI.D_-1079 B 20 Color Coding of Pushbuttons and Switches 11002s 1 2-8
| |
| -STP57 12/01/89 R
| |
| | |
| e
| |
| ((.
| |
| c
| |
| ' HOUSTON' ' CONTROL ROOM
| |
| , Q. ~
| |
| j'0HT'NG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| TABLE 2 1 (Continued) 1 HEDs--IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number Eggg Title HED 1080 C 32 Open/Close Indication For RCS Purification Flow Controller
| |
| 'HED 1081 B 13 Annunciator and ESF Status Monitoring Lampbox Labels HED 1082 C 50 ERFDADS Inputs for ESF Actuation Signal Alarms Incomplete HED-1083 0 16 Inadvertent Actuation of Communications Console Switches HED 1084' C 7- Backup Power for Telephone Equipment HED-1085 D 12 Maintenance Communication System Jack' Patch Panel
| |
| /'') Labeling j U
| |
| HED 1086 C3 Procedures far Emergency Equipment Use HED-1087- C4 Labeling of Storage Areas for Emergency Equipment HED-1088- D3 Control Room Noise Level i
| |
| HED 1089 C-11 Bypass / Inoperable Status Alarm for Normal Purge l Containment Isolation Valves HED 1090 D-16 Improper Color Coding of Switches on Panel CP010 i HED-1091 D 23- Process Mimic Color-Coded by Train HED-1092 D-14 Temporary Identification on Annunciator Windows Actuated by ERFDADS HED 1093 D-17 Bypass / Inoperable Status Manual Pushbuttons -
| |
| Differentiation from Indicating Lights HED 1094 C-51 Ranges for ECW Flow on QDPS and ERFDADS Displays HED 1093 A-14 Displayed Operator Action Points Inconsistent with E0Ps
| |
| () HED 1096- ~B-14 ESF Status Monitoring for Phase B Isolation )
| |
| HED-1097' C-52 ERFDADS Keyboard CRT Select Key Engraving
| |
| .110328 1 29 STP57 12/01/89 w
| |
| | |
| _~ .
| |
| l0 HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW.
| |
| [} ,
| |
| . ll0HTING POWER CO.
| |
| ^
| |
| l TABLE 2-1 (Continued) -l HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT-Number Eg.gg Title HED 1098 B 24 Condenser Vacuum Indication ~l -
| |
| HED 1099 B 16 Common Alarms Not Provided in Unit 2 .
| |
| HED 1100 D 24 EST Status Monitoring System Test Pushbutton Demarcation Pad / Labeling HED 1101 B-39 Labels for SI Actuation Switches HED 1102 B 40 "AFW Actuate" Usage l HED 1103 C-21 Engineering Units Designations for Recorders i
| |
| HED 1104 D-21 RCS Pressure Recorder Reading Comparison HED 1105 C-33 Train Related Color Coded Mimics 'j
| |
| -1 HED-1106 D-33 EFFDADS Display CV 02 l HED 1107 D 40 Power Range Low Setpoint Trip Block Pushbuttons HED-1108 A 15 SPDS Plant Status Monitoring during tdverse Containment Conditions HED 1109 C-53 SPDS Monitoring of ATWS Conditions HED 1110 D-34 SPDS Cursor Visibility on Trend Plots HED 1111 C-54 SPDS Top Level Display Bar Height HED-1112 C-55 E0P Parameter Label vs. SPDS Label HED 1113 D-35 SPDS Scale Legends on NSF-Z Display HED-1114 D 36 SPDS NSF Digital Values not Provided HED-1115 C-56 SPDS Microcurie Abbreviation HED 1116. C-57 SPDS NSF to CSF Changes on Reactor Trip O
| |
| d
| |
| -HED 1117 C 58 SPDS CSF P Display Spacing HED-1118 C-59 SPDS Subcooling "+/ " Conventions stoo2s 1 2 10 STP57. 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| t' 1
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM .
| |
| Q tOHTING DESIGN REVIEW' j POWER CO. 1 l
| |
| TABLE 2 1 (Continued)
| |
| HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT I
| |
| a Number Eagg Title 1 i
| |
| HED 1119 C 60 S/DS Alarm Acknowledgment Difficult HED 1120 C 61 SPDS Complexity l
| |
| HED 1121 'C 62- SPDS' Alarm Colors Inconsistent j l
| |
| HED 1122 D 37 SPDS " Breaker" Acronym i
| |
| HED 1123 D 38 SPDS Colors for Alarms and Trends HED 1124 C 63 SPDS NSF Z INOP Flags With Insufficient Labeling HED 1125 . C 64 SPDS NSF-Z Background Label Confusion l l
| |
| l HED 1126 C 65 CSF Operator Action Points Designations Inconsistent HED 1127 C 66 SPDS NSF S Layout / Labeling of NIS Readings HED 1128 B 25 Labeling for Steam Dump Rototellite Lights HED 1129 C 12 Lampbox Windows for AFW-Pump Start Blocked ]
| |
| HED 1130 C 34 Reset Pushbutton Escutcheon Engravings HED-1131 B-41 Turbine Bearing Water Spray Valve Labels
| |
| ' HED-1132 B 26 Delta-I Recorder Scale and Paper HED 1133 'C 35 Labels and Locations of Switches for SI check Valve Test Valves
| |
| - HED-1134 A-17 SI Termination /Reinitiation Criteria vs QDPS/ERFDADS Displays HED 1135 B 17 QDPL Alarm Wiadow Priorities HED 1136 D 39 ERFDADS Radiation Monitor Units on Displays HED 1137 D 25 Main Generator MVAR Meter Scale j-~ .
| |
| 1 HED-1138 B-60 SC Level Indicator and control-Switch Inconsistency
| |
| .HED-1139' C-22 Containment Moisture Indicator 110028-1 2 11 J STP57. 12/01/89.
| |
| | |
| s t
| |
| .nousToN CONTROL ROOM i
| |
| ..l}x- >OHTtNG ' DESIGN REVIEW .
| |
| POWER CO. l I
| |
| TABLE 2 1 (Continued)
| |
| HEDs IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT Number- ZA&R 11111 HED 1140- C-13 Nuisance Alarms on AW Pump Discharge Pressure i
| |
| HED 1141 0 14 Inappropriate Bypass /Inop Indication for Class 1E I Battery Chargers )
| |
| HED 1142 C-68 Valve Position Light Arrangement for MSR Main Steam Purge Valves HED 1143 C-5 Emergency Lighting Levels Outside Requirements HED 1144 D 18 Small Finger Operated Controls Difficult to Hold
| |
| " Actuated" for Slow Stroke Time Valves HED 1145 C 36 Inadequate Labeling for Jog-controlled Valves HED 1146 D4 ASP Controls Located Above 53 Inches HED 1147 D5 ASP Displays Located Above 65 Inches or Below 50 Inches HED 1148 D6 Access to Documents for ASP Operation HED 1149 D7 Expendables Not Provided in ASP Room i HED 1150 B6 Fluorescent Lights in CR Result in Glare HED-1151 D8 Air Velocities Above Limits in Unit 1 ASP HED 1152 D9 Direct Overhead Lighting in ASP Room HED-1153 D-10 Glare on ASP Heters HED 1154 D 22 Scale Graduation Dimensions on ASP Meters HED 1155 D 13 Lecation of Communications Box in Unit 1 ASP Room HED 1156 C6 Annunciator Procedure Binders and Access to Panels HED-1157 D 11 Background Noise Level at ASP HED-1158 B 58 ASP RHR Controller / Meter Layout and Labeling 11oo2s 1 2 12 STP57 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| ^
| |
| L L
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM 0 }'GHMG POWER CO.
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW TABLE 2 1 (Continued) ,
| |
| HEDs-IDENTIFIED SINCE INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REP 0itT Number Eggg Title HED 1159 B 42 ASP Controller Labeling for CR/ ASP Control Transfer Pushbuttons HED 1160 C-37 Transfer Switch / Control Switch Association on Transfer Switch Pancis HED 1161 B 43 ASP Lights for RHR System Not Labeled O
| |
| 11oo2s 1 2-13 STP57 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| 1.
| |
| P nousioN CONTROL ROOM
| |
| ? L'GHT'NG DESIGN REVIEW Q".
| |
| s
| |
| - POWER CO.
| |
| TABLE 2 2 HEDs IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT TITLE NUMBER Eg!E Annunciator Horns S 510 A5 Rototellite Lights S 367, 484, A8 679, 725, 748 Legend Pushbutton S 703 B 21 '
| |
| Distinguishability from Legend Lights Knurled or J Handle S 711, 734, B 22 i Switches 695, 705, 699, 459
| |
| -O Meter Zone Markings S 006, 288, B 27 f
| |
| Q 676, 299, 310, 764, 787, 480, 364, 060, 912, 961, 998 Intermediate Graduation S 671, 743, B-28 Marks for Scales 650, 782, 360, 392 Parameters Not Immediately S 716, 666, B 29
| |
| -Usable from Meters 739, 776, 470 Abbreviations on Meter Faces S-718, 668, B-30 741, 757, 778, 471, 404, 406 Number of Graduations S 719, 670, B-31 Between Scale Markings 742, 649, 759, 781, 475, 359, 334, 329 bo 1100281 2-14 STP57 12/01/89
| |
| .2-__-___-____--__-_______ ________?_-_.
| |
| | |
| i Houston CONTROL ROOM h UGHisNo DESIGN REVIEW.
| |
| s
| |
| :M> POWER CO.
| |
| 1 TABLE 2-2 (Continued)
| |
| HEDs. IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL HED RESOLUTION REPORT TITLE FUMBER E691 Distinguishability of S 720, 672, B 32 Intermediate and Minor 744, 651, Graduations on Scales 760, 783, 476, 361 Vertical Meter Pointers - Black S 724, 675, B-33 vs. Red 747, 655, 763, 786, 479, 408, 911, 960, 997 j Incompatible Scales for S 871, 885 B 34 Parameters Which Must be Compared Inappropriate Ranges on S-877, 880, B 35 ;
| |
| Meters 882, 872, l 873, 884, l 800, 804, h 808 l Scales Inconsistent with S-878, 879, B-36 Degree of Readability 881, 870, Required 874, 883, 799, 803, 1 807, 892
| |
| '1 Lettering Size on Labels S 584, 216, B 44 692, 637, 615, 626, 449, 437,
| |
| %5, 342 Stroke Width to-Character S-591, 693, B-45 Height Ratio and Engraving 602, 639, Inconsistencies on Labels 618, 630, 447, 440, 343, 346 D,
| |
| V 11oo2s 1 2-15 STP57 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| 7, . _ . . . -- .
| |
| t J
| |
| i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM 0 j'GHT'NG POWER CO, DESIGN - REVIEW '
| |
| J t
| |
| J 9
| |
| l'i 1
| |
| I'
| |
| ! ~.
| |
| '^ -, CATEGORY A HED DISPOSITIONS i i q
| |
| l l
| |
| U i
| |
| l.
| |
| I l
| |
| 1 1
| |
| 1:
| |
| t l
| |
| LO 1
| |
| tiocas t A-1 !
| |
| I STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM
| |
| : UGHTING Og$$QN ggylgW DHOUSTON &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER 085ERVAT10N OR Dl5P05tT10N REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1004 There is no direct The high flow switch has been P 6. 3.1.2 feedback for component replaced with a high/ low flow P, 8.1 cooling water flow to switch. The annunciator and the reactor coolant pump computer provide the CCW low flow thermal barriers. High alarms to the operator, flow is determined by means of a high flow Based on the above actions, this switch. Normal flow can HED is considered resolved for only be determined Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| indirectly by a time consuming process of O.
| |
| checking status of numerous valves and operation of a OCW pump.
| |
| REF:
| |
| E0P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 A2 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| H)USTON CONTROL ROOM UOHTING g ggqq y g g yjg y Q
| |
| !w,'
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY A t SHEET NUMBER 00$ERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1010 The "first out" windows The coloring of the "first-out" P 6 ._3 . 3 . 5 are unreadable when lit annunciator windows has been l P,- 8 . 6.11 because the letters are changed to white with black white on a red window letters. (The red border around and tend to wash out, the "first out" group of windows was retained.)
| |
| l l
| |
| REF: Based on the above actions, this I l
| |
| E0P VALIDATION REPORT HED is considered resolved for l APPENDIX A Unit 1 and Unit 2. l O
| |
| G l l
| |
| 1 l
| |
| l l
| |
| i O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 A-3 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM L\aHisNa DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| V'' l HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1011 The annunciator " TEST" A guard has been installed over P,- 6. 3. 4. 2 push pushbutton was each annunciator system " TEST" P,- 8 . 4 . 3 . D inadvertently depressed pushbutton to differentiate it several times while from the " SILENCE", " ACKNOWLEDGE",
| |
| actually trying to and " RESET" pushbuttons and to
| |
| " SILENCE" or " RESET" the prevent inadvertent activation of annunciator. the system test.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for REF: Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028-1 A-4 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING ggggg y gg yjg g
| |
| .o POWER CO,
| |
| ?% ,
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMSER OBSERVATION OR DISPOslTION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH S 510 Original annunciator To correct this discrepancy, six P, 6. 3. 2.1 design provides for only horns have been installed in the l P,- 8 . 4 .1 one DC buzzer, control room.
| |
| l A human factors evaluation during December 1986 has determined.that REF: the installation of audible 1
| |
| INITIAL HED RESOLUTION devices meets the criteria.
| |
| REPORT PAGE A 2 Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| 1 Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP qiteria Report Number 110028 1 A-5 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| 1 HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING ggggg y g g yjg g POWER CO.
| |
| . O.
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1009 The blue " Power Power available should be P 6.5.3.2 Available" lights on determined by using the voltmeter P, App . H CP003 indicate motor between the 13.8kV/4160V-H.1 operated disconnect transformer mimic and the 4160V switch position and not supply breaker switch. The the Engineered Safety purpose of the lights has been Features (ESF) 4160V bus clarified to indicate to the voltage. This gives operator whether and which feed false indication that from the 13.8kV buses is lined up, offsite power is The indicating light color has available and energizing been revised to red. The light
| |
| .O the ESF buses. input has been revised to indicate that the supply breaker from that 13.8kV bus is in the closed position, Since the supply REF: breaker cannot be closed unless E0P VALIDATION REPORT the corresponding disconnect APPENDIX A switch is closed, this light indicates that the supply breaker and disconnect switch from that 13.8kV bus are both in the closed position.
| |
| (Cont.)
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P3 is STP C iteria Report Number 110028 1 A6
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM i'GH*3 DESIGN REVIEW.
| |
| POWER CO, (N
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH l
| |
| Information has been issued to the Operations and Training Departments identifying the above resolution; this information has been included in the operator requalification program.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O l l
| |
| l l
| |
| I I
| |
| l l
| |
| l l
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s 1 A-7 l STP61 12/01/89 j
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO,
| |
| (] ,
| |
| Q HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER 085ERVATION OR Dl5PO51 TION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH S 367 Rototellite green light This HED was reviewed by a task S 484 color is not team anJ che following is noted:
| |
| S-679 distinguishable.
| |
| S 725- Where panel space limitation was S 748 not a factor, the rototellites P,- 6. 5. 3.1 were replaced with conventional P, App . H REF: indicating lights. This occurred H.1 INITIAL HED RESOLUTION on panels CP001, CP002, CP003, H.2.2 REPORT PAGES A 4, A 5 CP004, CP005, and CP006.
| |
| H.3.1 The rototallites were retained on V panels CP007 and CP008 due to l panel space limitations.
| |
| A space limitation problem was encountered on panel CP022 where rototellites are installed, but the rototellites were not l considered to be a problem since these are positioned on a vertical l surface.
| |
| The vendor advises that these rototellites are a standard design used in numerous power plant control room applications.
| |
| (Cont'd)
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 A8 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| I HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG g g ggg y g g yjg y O
| |
| V POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY A SHEET-NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH The STP circuit design is such
| |
| ; that the bulbs will operate at approximately 5 percent above the rated voltage, thereby increasing i the intensity but somewhat i
| |
| reducing the life.
| |
| A human factors evaluation ;
| |
| performed during December 1986 has determined that these lights meet the criteria; the visibility under actual operating conditions is acceptable.
| |
| l l
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| l l
| |
| l O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s 1 A-9 J STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG L
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO, HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1006 Labeling of the CCW and The nameplates have been revised P 6.6.3.6 ECW pump switches is too to spell out the full names of the P, 6. 4.1. 2 similar. The CCW and pumps Additionally, the CCW and 6.4.5.E ECW switches are close ECW systems have been demarcated 6.4.5.H to each other and some with different shades of paint.
| |
| operators have used the wrong switch. Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for-Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| E0P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A O Note: Reference P, is NUREG< 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s 1 A 10 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlOHTING g gglQ y g g yjg y a
| |
| /~3 ' POWER CO.
| |
| U HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY A l SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION .
| |
| OR DISPOSITION l REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH j I
| |
| HED-1007 Labels and mimic for the The labels and mimic have been 1
| |
| P 6. 6.1. 2 ' component cooling water revised to improve descriptions, '
| |
| 6.6.3.2 (CCW) system are eliminate possible confusion, 6.6.6.4 inadequate, better reflect system arrangement, P,- 6. 4 .1. 3 and provide differentiation 6.4.5 between trains.
| |
| App. N N.1.2 REF: Based on the above actions, this E0P VALIDATION REPORT HED is considered resolved for APPENDIX A Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O 1
| |
| l l
| |
| i l
| |
| 1 l
| |
| l l
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C:-iteria Report Number 11002s 1 A-11 !
| |
| l STP61 12/01/89 l
| |
| i
| |
| | |
| I HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LfGHTING DESIGN REVIEW O
| |
| :\,1 POWER CO.
| |
| j HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY A l
| |
| SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED.1008 The load center switches The handles of those particular Pi -6. 6.1.1 on CP010 that must be switches have been color coded to 6.6.6.3' actuated to de energize provide a contrast to other l P, App. S the control rod drive switches.
| |
| S.4.E motor generator (MG) sets after an Based on the above actions, this l
| |
| I
| |
| " Anticipated Transient HED is considered resolved for Without Scram" (ATWS) Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| are not easily identifiable. (Refer also to HED 1079, Category B.)
| |
| REF:
| |
| E0P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 A-12 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW
| |
| /'~Y POWER CO.
| |
| V.
| |
| HF AREA Labels and location Aids HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER Ot$ERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE 1 PARAGRAPH HED 1045 Existing demarcation on Demarcation lines have been added P,- 6. 6. 6. 2 CP006 does not prevent to separate the SG groups.
| |
| P, 6. 8.1. 3 association of SG 1B ,
| |
| 6.5.1.3 level meters with SG 1A Based on the above actions, this l App. N PORV control, and SG 1D HED is considered resolved for N.1.1 level meters with SG 10 Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| PORV control. ,
| |
| l l
| |
| l REF' RANDOM SAMPLE REVIEW OF DEMARCATION PAINTING (EXECUTIVE
| |
| | |
| ==SUMMARY==
| |
| | |
| CURRENT ADDENDUM, )
| |
| SECTION 5.0, ITEM 8)
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 g,y3 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG a
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW
| |
| ,d POWER CO.
| |
| U HF AREA computers HED CATEGORY A 1
| |
| $HEET 1 NUMBER OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE l PARAGRAPH HED 1095 Operator action points The QDPS displays have been I P,- 6. 7. 2. 7 shown on QDPS and revised to reflect the current EOP P, 11.1.1 ERFDADS displays are not setpoints. Several of the QDPS consistent with the E0Ps displays had been designed such in all cases, that the current EOP setpoints-could not be entered. The QDPS l software has been revised such l that the correct setpoints can now REF: be entered. These correct ENGINEERING OBSERVATION setpoints have been entered, and AND SPDS MAN-IN-THE 1DOP the displayed setpoints are in VALIDATION agreement with the E0P setpoints.
| |
| The ERFDADS displays have been modified to reficct the current E0P setpoints.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O' Note: Reference P, is NUREG- 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 A-14 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG ggggg y gg yjg g a
| |
| -p. POWER CO.
| |
| U HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1108 The SPDS does not The SPDS software has been revised P,- 6. 7. 2. 7 accurately monitor to incorporate adverse containment P 11.1.1 Critical Safety Function setpoints so that the algorithm 11.1.4 (CSF) status under automatically changes to the App. Q adverse containment correct setpoints. Thus, the CSF Q.7 conditions. This can status box colors are determined result in a less using correct setpoints for the conservative CSF conditions existing in the indication for core containment.
| |
| cooling and heat sink.
| |
| In addition, SPDS displays have been revised to show '' ADVERSE CNTMT" in reverse video in the REF: , vicinity of parameters whose SPDS MAN IN THE lh0P setpoints are affected during VALIDATION adverse containment conditions, i.e., RCS subcooling and core exit temperatures on the CSF core cooling display, and in the vicinity of the steam generator levels on the CSF heat sink display. These display changes are essential for the monitoring of CSF parameters and status during adverse containment conditions.
| |
| (Cont'd)
| |
| (UD Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 A-15 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| "y HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gg ggg y g g yjg y s
| |
| G, POWER CO.
| |
| A ).
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR Dl5PO51 TION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2. .
| |
| l i
| |
| l l
| |
| O I
| |
| 1 I
| |
| i l
| |
| I l
| |
| l 19 l
| |
| v Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number 1
| |
| i l
| |
| P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s.1 A-16 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gggggy ggyjgy POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE - CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1134 The QDPS and ERFDADS "SI The ERFDADS display has been P, 6.7.2.6 TERM /REINIT" displays revised to show the correct values '
| |
| P,- App. Q provide information on for SI termination /reinitiation, Q.6 the parameters, based on the E0Ps, and to identify requirements, and adverse containment conditions. l current status of values for terminating or The QDPS "SI TERM /REINIT" display I reinitiating Safety has been revised to correct Injection (SI), setpoints shown incorrectly. The l However, the values display has also been revised to provided for " REQ'D add the actual RCS pressure value for " Current Status" and the
| |
| ~
| |
| STATUS" are incorrect in some cases as compared required value for " Reg'd Status",
| |
| with the E0Ps, and in based on the EOPs.
| |
| some cases the displays are incomplete. Based on the above actions, this Additionally, adverse HED is considered resolved for containment conditions Unit 1 and Unit 2, also affect certain values, but this is not identified on the displays.
| |
| (Cont.)
| |
| l l
| |
| lO l
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s.1 A 17 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| G 4 HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM ggggg y g gygg y Q LIGHTING l
| |
| 4 POWER CO, i HF AREA Computers' HED CATEGORY A
| |
| $NEET NUMBEg OBSERVATION OR Dl5PO51 TION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH Discrepancies of displays providing I incorrect setpoints and not identifying 1
| |
| setpoints affected by adverse containment conditions are considered HED Category A.
| |
| Discrepancies of I displays providing incomplete setpoint data 1 are considered HED Category C, l
| |
| l REF: _
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION l DURING SPDS MAN-IN THE- l LOOP VALIDATION 1
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P2 is STP C citeria Report Number 11oo2s 1 A-18 STP61 12/01/89 l
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM I LIGHT lNG ggSlQ N Q g ylg g POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Panel Layout HED CATEGORY A SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1005 The Safety Injection Mimics have been revised to P,- 6. 8 .1. 3 System layout is clearly differentiate between the P, 6. 5.1. 3 confusing. The three . SIS trains and subsystems, trains and various subsystems are not Based on the above actions, this clearly differentiated. HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| E0P VALIDATION REPORT O- APPENDIX A O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P is STP C :iteria Report Number 11002s.1 A 19 STP61 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| e
| |
| : i. '
| |
| !.! 4
| |
| ,]p.
| |
| . 1, } , s
| |
| . yyym* CONTROL ROOM 'i C; s DESIGN REVIEW >
| |
| c-Powan co.-
| |
| 'k k
| |
| 4
| |
| 'I CATEGORY B HED DISPOSITIONS l
| |
| l j: '
| |
| t O .
| |
| 11oo2s-1 B1 L STP58 12/01/89 g7 ____ _ _ _ ___ _.____- ____ ._____.__._ _ ___ ,_._ _ _ _ _ ,,_ , ,_ _ __,_ _ , _ _
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESlGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| Workspace HED CATEGORY B HF AREA N BR OBSERVATION DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGPAPH HED 1030 Glare exists from meters Lighting modifications have been S 0177 on panels CP001 through performed in the control room to P, 6.1. 5. 3. f CP010. address lighting concerns. After P, App. D evaluation to determine settings D.1.2 G for proper lighting levels (see HED 1061, Category B), glare REF: problems were again found. These CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS problems have been documented as HED 1150 (Category B).
| |
| Based on the opening of HED 1150, this HED is considered closed for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| 9 O Note: Reference P, is NUREC -0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11ocas.1 B2 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON. CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
| |
| /~'y POWER CO.
| |
| -V.
| |
| HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH llED 1061 With control room Additional light fixtures have S-0170 lighting at maximum been added near panels CP004 and-P - 6.1. 5. 3. a setting, criteria levels , CP005. The light survey has been P,. App . D not satisfied are: repeated to establish an optimum D.1.2 setting for the light dimmers.
| |
| l
| |
| * Maximum of 50 This confirmed that the design l footcandles on change resulted in illumination CP001, CP002, CP007, levels meeting the criteria.
| |
| CP008, CP009 The light dimmer knobs were marked
| |
| * Minimum of 20 to identify the optimum setting.
| |
| i footcandles on CP004, CP005 Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for With lighting at reduced Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| IcVel (rheostats at 8 o' clock), levels not satisfied are:
| |
| * Minimum of 20 footcandles on CP004, CP005 REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS O
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG- 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Ci iteria Report Number 110028 1 B3 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| J HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG ggggg y gg ygg y r'. POWER CO.
| |
| k.). -'
| |
| HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY B SHEET l NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE l PARAGRAPH j HED 1062 The emergency lighting Additional lighting has been j S 0182 illumination levels on provided for the main control P,- 6.1. 5. 4. c panels CP001, CP004, panel horseshoe area. Lights have P, App . D CP006, and CP010 do not been balanced between the two B.1.3.B meet the 10 footcandle- banks of lighting. Another l requirement. lighting evaluation has been performed. The study included l
| |
| panels CP001 through CP010, and )
| |
| l panels CP018 and CP022 as well.
| |
| REF: Additional locations were observed CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS where the criteria were not met (see HED 1143, Category C).
| |
| Based on the opening of HED 1143, this HED is considered closed for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| n V Note: Reference P, is NUREG- 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 B.4 STPS8 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM :
| |
| L'.GHTlNG ggggg y gg yjg y a
| |
| (U') POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY B SHEET ,
| |
| NUMBER OBSERVATION -
| |
| OR Dl5&O51 TION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGfMPH HED 1063 Noise levels in the The control room HVAC system has S 0184 control room with two been revised and balanced to P.- 6.1. 5. 5. a and three trains of HVAC reduce noise levels per the design P, App. D operating exceed the 65 criteria. A follow up survey was D 1.4.B dB(A) limit, resulting performed in Unit 1, which showed in communication that noise levels are within the S 0185 difficulty. criteria except for one operating P, 6.1. 5. 5. a configuration at one P, App. D representative location. This D.1.4.C exception has been documented as g REF: HED 1088 (Category D).
| |
| S-0186 CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS P. 6.1. 5. 5. b Noise level surveys performed in P, App. D the Unit 2 control room have D 1.4.D indicated that noise levels are below the 65 dB(A) limit for the S 0187 normal operating configuration of P,- 6.1. 5. 5. c two HVAC trains in service.
| |
| P,- App. D Three train HVAC operation noise D.1.4.E level measurements have not yet been performed. These surveys will be performed as part of the resolution of HED 1088, Based on the above actions, this HED is considered closed for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| b Note: Reference P, is NUREG- 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 B5 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING ggggg y g g yjg y f
| |
| V]
| |
| D HOUSTON a POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREAW orkspace HED CATEGORY B SHEET l NUMBER OBSERVATION '
| |
| OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1150 Overhead lighting units This discrepancy remains under P, 6.1.5.3.e (egg crates) permit evaluation to determine final P, App. D light from fluorescent disposition. This final D.1.2.E tubes to impinge disposition will consider normal directly on the Main and emergency lighting levels as Control Panel surfaces well. (See Category B HED 1061, resulting in glare on Category B HED 1062, and panel mimics and meters. Category C HED 1143.)
| |
| i REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS 4
| |
| l '
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREC- 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Cr iteria Report Number l
| |
| l 110028 1 B.6 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM ,
| |
| LlOHTlNG gg$$QN ggyjgy-G POWER CO.
| |
| V HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY B SHEET 1 NUMBER OBSERVATION :
| |
| OR Di$ POSITION l REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1051 The Containment The ESF Status Monitoring System P, 6. 3.1. 2 Isolation Phase A signal has been revised to provide P, 10. 2. B to several valves is Bypass /Inop windows for these i defeated by moving the valves on the Containment I transfer switch away Isolation Phase A lampbox and i from the " Control Room" delete the windows on the position. However, incorrect lampbox.
| |
| Bypass /Inop indication for these valves is not Based on the above actions, this shown on the Containment HED is considered resolved for Isolation Phase A Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| lampbox.
| |
| Valves in question are:
| |
| Train A: FV-2454 Train B: FV 2455 FV 4823 Train C: FV-4454 FV-4455 FV-2458 l
| |
| l l
| |
| l' REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
| |
| - t'O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number l
| |
| 110020-1 B7 STP58 12/01/89 a - . .- . . _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
| |
| | |
| ~
| |
| ' HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING pg$$Q N g g ylg y
| |
| ^ &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| v( Y HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH
| |
| ]
| |
| 1 HED 1052 The Main Steam Isolation The ESF Status Monitoring System l P, 6. 3.1. 2 signal for the drain has been revised to provide P, 10. 2 . B valves is defeated by Bypass /Inop windows for the main moving the transfer steam drain valves on the Steam switch away from the Line Isolation lampbox and delete
| |
| " Control Room" position, the windows on the incorrect However, Bypass /Inop lampbox, indication for these valves is not shown on Based on the above actions, this the Steam Line Isolation HED is considered resolved for f lampbox. Valves are Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| k FV 7900A, FV 7901A, FV-7902A, and FV 7903A. '
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
| |
| l-l l
| |
| l l O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P is STP Criteria Report Number 1100281 B-8 STP58- 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW :
| |
| ( POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator -
| |
| HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION DISPOSITION .
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAM4 HED 1053 The Safety Injection The ESF Status Monitoring System P, 6. 3.1. 2 signal is defeated for has been revised to provide '
| |
| P,- 10. 2. B the Radiation Monitoring , Bypass /Inop windows for these 10.2.C and Hydrogen Analyzer components on the Control Room room fans by moving the HVAC and Combustible Gas Control transfer switch away lampboxes (2M60, 2M61, 22M10, from the " Control Room" 22M04 and 22M06). The windows position. However, have been deleted on the incorrect Bypass /Inop indication lampbox.
| |
| for these fans is not shown on the control Based on the above actions, this Room HVAC or Combustible HED is considered resolved for i
| |
| Cas Control lampboxes. Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION f
| |
| i.
| |
| l l
| |
| l l
| |
| 1 l
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREC -0700 Section 6 Number P is STP C riteria Report Number 2
| |
| 11002s 1 B9 l
| |
| STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| a l
| |
| l l
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW A
| |
| /T-LJ D LlOHTING &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| l HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY B
| |
| $HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR Di$PO$1 TION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1054 RHR heat exchanger The ESF Status Monitoring System P 6.3.3.3.b bypass and flow control has been revised by soving the '
| |
| - P, 10. 2 . C valves are shown for windows from the RHR system block Bypass /Inop status in to the IJISI system block in the SI the RHR section of the lampboxes (typical all three Safety Injection lamp- trains). .
| |
| boxes. However, the Bypass /Inop status is Based on the above actions, this applicable to the IllSI HED is considered resolved for portion instead, based Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| upon the alarm
| |
| \
| |
| condition.
| |
| During full power ,
| |
| operation, the operator would believe the RHR system to be inoperable rather than the SI l
| |
| j system. During RHR l conditions, when flow is j' being throttled and the heat exchanger bypassed, the wir. dows would always be lit.
| |
| REF:
| |
| 1 ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number
| |
| , P, is STP Criteria Report Number l
| |
| 110028 1 B-10 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| houston CONTROL ROOM Ll3HTlNG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO. .
| |
| G HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OSSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE PARAGRAPH CRITERIA TIT',.f HED 1066 During a loss of offsite The input to the EST Status P. 6. 3.1. 2 power (th0P), the EST Monitoring System fail to actuate P, 10. 2 . D Status Monitoring System subsystem has been revised, using does not provide the ESF load sequencer output indication of components indicating a LOOP condition, that failed to actuate Thus, af ter a lh0P, components properly in response to failing to operate properly are the LOOP. The input alarmed through the fail to.
| |
| provided is inappro- actuate subsystem of ESF Status priate, showing only bus Monitoring, undervoltage condition, which is removed when Based on the above actions, this j the standby diesel HED is considered resolved for generator provides power Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| to the bus. Thus, operators do not receive l indication of which components failed to actuate, which is the function of the fail to-actuate subsystem.
| |
| REF:
| |
| STARTUP OBSERVATION 1
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG- 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Cr iteria Report Number 1100281 B.11 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i H CONTROL ROOM
| |
| *H Dj'OUSTON G POWER CO.
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW '
| |
| t
| |
| .HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY B 5HEET NUMsga OBSERVATION 04 DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1067 The ESF Status ERFDADS provides equipment status P, 6. 3.1. 2 Monitoring System logic information for use in the ESF P, 10. 2. D provides fail to actuate Status Monitoring System logic, alarms during a loss of- The ERFDADS software has been offsite power (LOOP) to modified such that information HVAC components, provided to ESF Status Monitoring, However, these when acted upon by that logic, coroponents are not results in alarms for components actuated on LOOP. only when the component should have operated and did not operate properly following a IAOP, t
| |
| REF: Based on the above actions, this STARTUP OBSERVATION HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C iteria Report Number 11002s1 g.12 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY B
| |
| $HEET NUMDga OBSERVATION p
| |
| A(FERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1081 Annunciator and EST Temporary labels for the P. 6. 3. 3.1 Status Monitoring annunciator and ESP Status 6.6.5.1 lampboxes do not have Monitoring lampboxes have been P, 6. 4.1. 2 labels corresponding to replaced with permanent labels annunciator response conforming to the CRDR criteria, procedures. Temporary labels are currently in Based on the above actions, this use. HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| STARTUP OBSERVATION Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C: iteria Report Number i 11002s.1 8 13 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| houston CONTROL ROOM L93HTING pg $$Q N g g y$g g POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY B 5HEET NUNigga 085ERVAT10N OR Dl5PO51T10N REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1096 Currently, containment The Phase A windowbox has been P, 6. 3. 3.1 Isolation Phase B revised as follows:
| |
| 6.3.3.3 bypass / inoperable and P, 8,5.1. 2 fail to actuate A) Relabeled as Phase A/ Phase B indications are shown using the Containment B) Differentiation between and Isolation Phase A ESF labeling of Phase A and Phase B Status Monitoring fail to actuate system indica-windowbox. The tions component windows.
| |
| bypass / inoperable windows for Phase B are C) Phase B signal presence window not differentiated from provided in a manner consistent the Phase A windows; the with other ESTAS signals.
| |
| Phase B fail to actuate windows are not clearly Based on the above actions, this differentiated from the HED is considered resolved for Phase A component Unit I and Unit 2.
| |
| windows. (Use of the Phase A windowbox for Phase B indications was implemented as an interim fix until a long term design could be implemented.) This situation leads to operator confusion as to (Cont.)
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 11oo2s 1 B 14 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| l I
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM fH"* DESIGN REWEW ;
| |
| (~)
| |
| NJ POWER CO, ,
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY B i
| |
| $HEET i Nug3En Ot$ERVATION i OR Dl5P05tT10N >
| |
| ^
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH where the Phase B '
| |
| isolation ESF Status Monitoring is displayed ,
| |
| in the control room. i Also, the light location used to indicate Phase B t actuation is a fail to-actuate window, and thus '
| |
| tends to indicate an abnormal condit)on when ;
| |
| , one does not in fact exist. ,
| |
| l I
| |
| REF:
| |
| i ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
| |
| I O Note: Reference P, is NUREG, 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Ci iteria Report Number I 110028 1 B 15 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| houston CONTROL ROOM Y'*H** DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY B 5HEET NUMREg 085ERVATlON OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1099 Annunciator windows for Annunciator vindows for critical P,. 6. 3.1. 2. d shared systems and shared systems and equipment P,. 8. 3. E equipment are provided (e.g., circulating water system) 6.1.2 in the Unit I control have been provided in the Unit 2 room, but are not control room, provided in Unit 2.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved.
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION O
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Numbe'.-
| |
| P, is STP Criteria Report Number 1100281 g.16 STP58 12/01789
| |
| | |
| i l
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM ggggg y g g yjg g D LGHTlNG
| |
| ?
| |
| a
| |
| (~} POWER CO.
| |
| v HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY B SHEET :
| |
| NUMgga OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH i i
| |
| HED 1135 QDPS alarm windows are Die QDPS alarm windows have been P. 6. 3.1. 4 identified as Priority 3 changed to Priority 2 (yellow)
| |
| P, 8. 4. 4 (white) windows. lenses.
| |
| However, QDPS alaras identify Tech Spec Based on the above actions, this limiting conditions for HED is considered resolved for operation (LCO) Unit I and Unit 2.
| |
| violations, and therefore should be Priority 2 (yellow) ,
| |
| windows.
| |
| O~
| |
| i l
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
| |
| i l
| |
| l l
| |
| l Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 B.17 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW V
| |
| GHOUSTON &
| |
| POWER 00. '
| |
| HF AREA Controls HED CATEGORY B _
| |
| SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1002 control switches The control switches on Transfer P. 6.4.1.1.c installed on Transfer Panel ZLP 701 have been changed so P, 4. 3.1 Switch Panel ZLP 701 for that their action is identical to 5.4 control of the RHR those on Main Control Panel CP002 system sample select and meet the CRDR criteria.
| |
| valves do not have the same action as the Based on the above actions, this switches located on Main HED is considered resolved for Control Panel CP002 Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| which control the same valves.
| |
| Both Main Control Panel and Transfer Switch Panel control switches are required to meet the same criteria established in the Control Room Design Review Criteria Report.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION O
| |
| d Note: Reference P, is NUREG< 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number j 110028 1 B.18 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTlNG
| |
| & DESIGN REWEW
| |
| ,- POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA controls HED CATEGORY B 5HEET NUMBEa OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1003 Emergency stop An " Emergency Stop" switch in the P 6.4.1.1 capability for shutting control room has been provided for 6.1.1.1 down the Standby Diesel each Standby Diesel Generator to P, 6. 2.1 Generators from the override the start signal and stop 6.1.1.1 control room is not the diesel, provided. Thus, if the diesel generator's Based on the above actions, this cooling water fails, the HED is considered resolved for generator might overheat Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| before it can be stopped locally, i
| |
| REF:
| |
| E0P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A 1
| |
| O
| |
| () Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 B.19 j- STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LOH G
| |
| & DESIGN REVIEW T"'S POWER CO.
| |
| NJ HF AREA controls HED CATEGORY B 5HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPO$1 TION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1079 Trip / actuate and reset The trip / actuate switches have P, 6. 4.1. 2 pushbuttons are been color coded red; 6.4.2.2 inconsistent in color additionally, pushbuttons have P, 6. 2.1.10 coding (red vs. white) been provided with guards, and use of guards.
| |
| There is also no color Reset switches are color coded coding of the white; guards are not provided for Electroswitches used for reset pushbuttons since no ESTAS actuation. significant adverse effects will result from reset.
| |
| Based on the above action, this KEF: HED is considered resolved for ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| I l
| |
| V Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number l 110028 1 B.20
| |
| ! STP58 12/01/89 J
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING 5
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO,
| |
| ('']'
| |
| L HF AREA Controls HED CATEGORY B 5HEET NUMBER ORSERVATION DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH S 703 Legend pushbuttons on A special study recommended the P, 6.4. 3. 3 the main turbine insert " Closed Corner Octagon" marking P, App . E panels are not readily ,
| |
| for the controls. Refer to the l E.1.5.1 distinguishable from CRDR Special Studies Report, legend lights. " Distinguishable Legend Pushbutton from Legend Lights". l l
| |
| The study recommendation has been REF: implemented. A human factors INITIAL HED RESOLUTION evaluation was performed during e- REPORT PAGE B 8 December 1986 and the implementation found to be satisfactory.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit I and Unit 2.
| |
| ,0 V
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG -0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 1100281 l 3,71 l STP58 12/01/89 t
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING ggglG N g g yjg g
| |
| ( POWER CO. I HF AREA controls ,, HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR Dl5PO51 TION i REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH S 711
| |
| * Select" function These switches were initially S 734 switches and pump or fan changed to knurled handles for S 695 control switches are not " select" functions and J handles S 705 provided with knurled or for pump or fan control.
| |
| S 699 J handles respectively S 459 on panels CP001, CP003, A special study recommended lever P 6.4.1.1 CP004, CP005, CP006 and handles for " select" functions.
| |
| P, 6. 2.1 CP007. Refer to the CRDR Special Studies Report, " Knurled Knob Position Indic a tor'' . The study q recommendation has been d REP: implemented. A human factors INITIAL HED RESOLUTION evaluation was performed during REPORT PAGE B 9 December 1986 and the implementation was found to be satisfactory.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| (3
| |
| 'd Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C:-iteria Report Number stoo2s 1 3 22 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM U3HTING gggggy ggyjgg POWER CO, HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUNitER ORSERVATION OR Dl5P05tTl0N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1013 The scales on the The signal conditioning for the P, 6. 5.1. 5 reactor coolant pump logarithmic flows has been revised P App. F seal flow recorders are so that all three inputs are T.5 a mixture of linear and linear.
| |
| logarithmic (square root) scales. Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit I and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| EOP val.IDATION REPORT O APPENDIX A 8
| |
| O Note: Reference P is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C -iteria Report Number i 110028 1 g.23 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| l l
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OB5ERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA T1TLE PARAGRAPH llED 1098 Condenser vacuum The indicator scales have been P, 6. 5.1.1 indicators in the replaced to read in inches of 6.5.1.2 control room read in mercury vacuum rather than 6.5.1.4 absolute pressure; absolute pressure, reading "30" at P, 6. 3.1. 2 procedures and trip the bottom of the scale and *0" at App. F setpoints are expressed the top.
| |
| F.1 in inches of mercury F.3.4 vacuum. Mental Based on the above actions, this calculations are Category B llED is considered required to determine resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| system status.
| |
| To resolve the resulting REF: discrepancy of having an upside-OPERATOR OBSERVATION down scale and the failed indicator reading 30 inches of mercury vacuum (considered to be a Category D llED), the instrument loop will be revised to reverse the transmitter output, and change the scale to read "0" at the bottom and "30" at the top.
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s.1 B 24 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM fH DESIGN REWEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B SNEET NUMsgR OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1128 The steam dump valve The position indicating lights for P. 6. 5.1.1 position indicating the steam dump valves have been 6.5.3.3 lights are not provided provided with labeling indicating 6.6.3.1 with any labeling condenser number and side, e.g.:
| |
| P, 6. 3.1. 2 indicating to which side CNDSR 11 VEST.
| |
| App. H of which condenser the H.3 valves are connected. Based on the above actions, this 6.4.5 Should one valve leak, HED is considered resolved for the operator is unable Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| to quickly direct auxiliary operators to O, the proper valve locatior.,
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION DURING SPDS MAN IN THE 140P VALIDATION ,
| |
| 1 O
| |
| Note: Reference P is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C -iteria Report Number 11002s 1 3 25 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOusion CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REWEW POWER CO, HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B 5HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1132 Delta I on each of four The four Delta 1 inputs have been l P. 6. 5.1.1 nuclear instrumentation removed from NR 0045 and moved to 6.5.1.2 (NI) channels is individual recorders NR 0041 P, 6. 3.1. 2 available for recording through NR 0044 for continuous App. F only on NR 0045, a two- recording, by combining Delta I, F.1 pen strip chart upper flux, and lower flux for recorder. NI channels each of the power range channels of source range (SR), on a three pen recorder.
| |
| intermediate range (IR),
| |
| power range (PR), or Based on the above actions, this Delta I may be recorded HED is considered resolved for O- by each pen via selector Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| switches. Scales are provided on the recorder for SR, IR, and PR inputs, but are not provided for Delta 1 inputs. Operator needs for trending Delta I and for trending SR, IR, and PR flux cannot be met by the existing two pen recorder.
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number i P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 3 26 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| 9 i
| |
| i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM i UGHTlNG ggggg y gg yjg g a
| |
| t'^') POWER CO. ;
| |
| V HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B l
| |
| 5HEET !
| |
| NUMBER OBSERVATION ;
| |
| OR DISPOSITION '
| |
| REFERENCE '
| |
| CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH t
| |
| S 006 Meter zone markings are A zone coding scheme has been S 288 not used to denote developed.
| |
| S-676 operational l
| |
| S 299 implications. A human factors evaluation of the S 310 materials and methods to be used S 764 was performed during December
| |
| {
| |
| S 787 1986. The zone coding S 480 REF: implementation method has been S 364 INITIAL HED RESOLUTION determined to meet the criteria S 060 REPORT PAGE B 13 via actual demonstration, m S 912
| |
| $.961 Implementation of the meter zone S 998 coding throughout the control room 4 P -6.5. 2. 3 has been completed. The zone P - App. F coding has been reviewed; the F.6 review has determined that the installed coding meets the criteria.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2, 1
| |
| i Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C -iteria Report Number
| |
| : 1. 1100281 B 27 l STP58 12/01/89 l -- - _ -
| |
| | |
| e HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM ggggg y g g yjg y !
| |
| D UGHTlNG s POWER CO. ;
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B
| |
| $NEET NUMSER OR$ERVATION 5 OR Dl5PO51T10N REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH ,
| |
| S 671 Intermediate graduation Engineering documents such as the S 743 marks are not used on meter scale drawings have been S 650 scales with five or more corrected.
| |
| S 782 graduations between S 360 numerals. New meter scales have been S 392 installed. A human factors P 6. 5.1.5 evaluation performed during P, App. F December 1986 has determined that F.4.C REF: the installed scales meet the INITIAL HED RESOLUTION criteria.
| |
| REPORT PAGE B 17
| |
| ,]U Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREC- 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C1 iteria Report Number 110028 1 B 28 l STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REWEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B SHEET Nuldigga OSSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH S 716 Meters contain Engineering documents such as the S 666 parameters which are in meter scale drawings have been S 739 a form that is not corrected.
| |
| S 776 immediately usable by S 470 the operator. New meter scales have been P 6.5.1. 2 installed. A human factors P, App. F evaluation performed during F.1 December 1986 has determined that REF: the installed scales meet the INITIAL HED RESOLUTION criteria.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C -iteria Report Number 110028 1 3 29 '
| |
| STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW GHOUSTON i'*HT'N3 POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPO51Tl0N REFEREEE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH S 718 Standard abbreviations Engineering documents such as the S 668 are not used on meter meter scale drawings have been S 741 faces. corrected.
| |
| S 757 S 778 New meter scales have been S 471 installed. A human factors S 404 REF: evaluation performed during S 406 INITIAL HED RESOLUTION Decenber 1986 has determined that P, 6. 5.1. 4 REPORT PAGE B 16 the installed scales meet the P app. T criteria.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 11oo2s1 B 30 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gg$$g g p g yjg g POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B 5HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH S 719 There are more than nine Engineering documents such as the S 670 graduations between meter scale drawings have been S 742 scale numerals, corrected.
| |
| S 649 S 759 New meter scales have been S 781 installed. A human factors S 475 REF: evaluation performed during S 359 INITIAL HED RESOLUTION December 1986 has determined that S 334 REPORT PAGE B 17 the installed scales meet the S 329 criteria.
| |
| P, 6. 5.1. 5 O P App. F F.4.A Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 1100281 3 31 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM UGHTING pg$$QN pgyggW OHOUSTON &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B 5HEET NUMBEg 085ERVAT10N REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH S 720 It is difficult to The meter task team has applied S 672 distinguish between the following criteria to the S 744 intermediate and minor meter scale redesign effort S 651 graduation marks on (graduation mark thickness):
| |
| S 760 meter scales. Major graduations 3 point or S 783 3/64 inch; Intermediate S 476 graduations 2 point or 1/32 inch; S 361 Minor graduations 1 point or P, 6. 5.1. 5 REF: 1/64 inch. Engineering documents P App. F INITIAL HED RESOLUTION such as the meter scale drawings F.4 REPORT PAGE B 18 have been corrected.
| |
| O New neter scales have been installed. A human factors evaluation performed during December 1986 has determined that the installed scales meet the criteria.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P; is STP Criteria Report Number l
| |
| 1100281 B 32 STF5B 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW D Lt3HTING &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERv D N oR DISPO$1 TION REFERENCE CAITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH S 724 Vertical meter pointers The possibility of painting the S 675 are blac' instead black pointers red was S 747 of red. ,
| |
| investigated but deemed not S 655 feasible. Painting pointers leads S 763 to instrument inaccuracies.
| |
| S 786 Vertical meters with black S 479 REF: pointers have been replaced with S 408 INITIAL HED RESOLUTION ones with red pointers.
| |
| S 911 REPORT PAGE B 19 S 960 Based on the above actions, this S 997 HED is considered resolved for O- P 6.5.2.2 Unit 1. These same changes are p, App . G being implemented for Unit 2.
| |
| C.2.3 (Circular meter pointers are readily visible; therefore the change in pointer color is not required.)
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C"iteria Report Number 110028 1 B.33 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGPAPH S 871 Parameters which must be New meter scales have been S 885 compared have meter installed and a human factors P, 6. 5.1. 5 scales with incompatible evaluation performed during P,. App. F numerical progression December 1986 determined that the F.5 and scale organization, installed scales meet the criteria.
| |
| Based on the above hetions, this REF: HED is considered resolved for INITIAL HED RESOLUTION Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O REPORT PAGE B 19 O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 1100281 B 34 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlOHTING ggggg y ggyjg y POWER CO.
| |
| HF AFtEA visual Displays HED CATEGORY ,,,, B SHEET NUMgga O8SERVATION OR DISPO$lTION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH >
| |
| S-877 Meters have Engineering documents such as the S 880 inappropriate ranges. meter scale drawings have been S 882 corrected to reflect the correct S+872 ranges.
| |
| S 873 S 884 REF: New meter scales have been S 800 INITIAL HED RESOLUTION installed. A human factors S 804 REPORT B 16 evaluation performed during S 808 December 1986 has determined that P 6.5.1. 2 the installed scales meet the
| |
| - P,. App , F criteria.
| |
| F.1.3 Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2. l l
| |
| l 1
| |
| 1 l
| |
| l I
| |
| l
| |
| (
| |
| \
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG- 0700 Section 6 Number i P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s 1 3 35 STPS8 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING OgSlQN REWEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA visual Displays HED CATEGORY B g n OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAEPAPH S 878 Scales are not Th -) meter task team has matched S 879 consistent with the the meter scales to the operating S 881 degree of precision and procedures requirements.
| |
| S 870 accuracy required. Engineering documents such as the S 874 meter scale drawings have been S 883 corrected.
| |
| S 799 S 803 REF: New meter scales have been S 807 INITIAL HED RESOLUTION installed. A human factors S 892 REPORT PAGE B 15 evaluation performed during P. 6. 5.1. 2 December 1986 has determined that P App. F the installed scales meet the F.1.1 criteria.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit I and Unit 2.
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number !
| |
| P, is STP Criteria Report Number l
| |
| u.on.i B.36 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i nousTon CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| B HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY N R .085tR ATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGPAPH llED 1016 The mimic for the The parallel orange mimic lines P 6.6.6.4 13.8 kV bus on panel that represent the 13.8 kV buses P, App. N CP010 is confusing have been differentiated amongst N.1.2 because of the number of themselves by adding black dashes the parallel horizontal and boxes onto the existing mimic paths shown, lines.
| |
| These subject mimic lines have been reviewed; this review has REF: determined that the installed EOP VALIDATION REPORT markings are effective in APPENDIX A differentiating the mimic lines.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this llED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG-0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 B 37 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| .1 H CONTROL ROOM i D s,yyy POWER CO.
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW \
| |
| 1 HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY B l 5HEET NUMsga 085tRVATION '
| |
| OR Dl5PO51 TION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE ;
| |
| PARAGRAPH ,
| |
| HED 1046 Labels "SG IV INLET" and The labels have been reversed, so P. 6. 6. 3.1 "SCFP SUCT HDR' do not that the label is provided for the
| |
| . P, 6 . 4 . 5 .1 correspond to the meters appropriate meter, they identify.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this ,
| |
| HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| I OPERATOR OBSERVATION l
| |
| 1 1
| |
| O Note: Reference P. is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number j
| |
| )
| |
| i 1100281 B.38 l
| |
| (
| |
| STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM :
| |
| LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO, HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION l OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1101 The labels for the The labels have been revised on P -6. 6. 3. 2 manual actuation both panels CP001 and CP005 to P, 6 . 4 . 5. A switches for Safety read "SI ACT". I Injection (SI) currently say "ESF ACT". The Based on the above actions, this label "SI" is quite HED is considered resolved for small and mounted on the Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| switch plate. Confr.sion results as to which switch is to be used for manual SI actuation, REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION DURING SPDS MAN-IN THE-l LOOP VALIDATION l
| |
| l Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number l
| |
| P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s 1 B 39 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG
| |
| * DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| NF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY -
| |
| B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH ]
| |
| HED 1102 "AW ACTUATE" is used on All usages of "AW ACTUATE" have P, 6. 6,3. 2 various labels to been revised to indicate "SG LO Lo l 1
| |
| P, 6. 4. 5. F indicate AW actuation LVL" to designate that'A W l as a result of steam actuation in response to SG low-generator (SG) low low low level has occurred, water level. However, the operators have Based on the above actions, this misinterpreted the label HED is considered resolved for as meaning AW auto Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| actuation from any
| |
| /- signal, and have '
| |
| 5 attempted to reset the signal even though SG low low level was not reached.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION DURING SPDS MAN IN THE-LOOP VALIDATION 8 Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C: iteria Report Number 110028 1 B 40 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING ggggg y ggyjg y POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR Dl5PO51 TION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1131 Turbine bearing water The label for each valve P -6. 6. 3. 2 spray valve pushbutton pushbutton has been replaced with P, 6. 4. 5 labels identify the a label indicating both the valve valve number, but do not number and the bearing being indicate which bearings sprayed. The hierarchical label are being sprayed by identifies these pushbuttons as that valve. In case of turbine bearing water spray a need to spray a valves.
| |
| particular bearing, identified to the Babed on the above actions, this p operator by location, HED is considered resolved for h the operator would be Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| unable to quickly identify which pushbutton to actuate.
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION DURING SPDS MAN IN-Tile-LOOP VALIDATION
| |
| .O V Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 11002s 1 B-41 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVADON p DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1159 On the Auxiliary Larger labels are being provided P,- 6. 6. 3. 6 Shutdown Panel, the clearly indicating "CR" and " ASP" P,- 6. 4. 5. H control transfer control, pushbuttons on the controllers for the RHR Other enhancements are also being heat exchanger valves considered to heighten awareness and the charging flow by the operator that pushbuttons control valves have are for control transfer, rather small labels indicating than manual / auto control.
| |
| "MCB" and " ASP" control.
| |
| The controllers are very similar to those in the control room, where the pushbuttons are for manual and automatic control. The small labels are not noticed, and deviate from STP convention ("CR" and
| |
| " ASP").
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION O Note: Reference P, is NUREC -0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11oo2s 1 B-42 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW \
| |
| a 1 POWER CO.
| |
| ~(
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY B i
| |
| SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE l PARAG'AAPH j 1
| |
| l HED-1161 On the Auxiliary The source and meaning of these j P - 6. 6.1.1 Shutdown Panel, just lights has been determined. l P - 6.4.1. 2 below the large "RHR" Evaluations are being made label, are three pairs regarding what lights are of indicating lights actually needed. The lights that are not labeled as provided as a result will be to their source or appropriately labeled, meaning. Operators are confused as to meaning, interpreting the lights as "RHR Pump Status" or "RHR Heat Exchanger Valve Status".
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C.-iteria Report Number 11oo2s 1 B-43 STP58_ 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| , HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HED CATEGORY B HF AREA Labels and Location Aids SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH S 584 One hundred seventy- An extensive study corrected this S 216 three labels on CP003 HED. The study is described in
| |
| -S 692 use 0.125 inch letters Note L 1 of the initial HED S 637 which allows a viewing Resolution Report and included S 615 distance of only 21 reviews of subtended visual S-626 inches. angles, reviews by plant S 449 operations personnel, and other S-437 tasks.
| |
| S-345 S 342 REF: A human factors evaluation P.- 6. 6. 4 .1 INITIAL HED RESOLUTION performed during December 1986 P, App . M REPORT PAGE B 25 determined that component labels M,1.A are suitable for a viewing distance of 42 inches as identified in Criteria Report, Appendix V, Table 4-1.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREC.0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 B-44 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| > HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING p gggg y g g yjg g a
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH S-591 Stroke width to-- An extensive study corrected this S-693 character height ratio HED. The study is described in S 602 is not between 1:6 and ,
| |
| Note L-1 of the initial HED S 639 1:8 on the service Resolution Report and included S 618 engravings and engraving reviews of stroke width-to.
| |
| S 630 is inconsistent, character height ratios, reviews S 447 by plant operations personnel, and S 440 other tasks.
| |
| S 343 S 346 REF: A human factors evaluation P, 6. 6.4.1 INITIAL HED RESOLUTION performed during December 1986 O- P,- App . M REPORT PAGE B 25 determined that stroke width to-M.1.G character height ratio was between 1:6 and 1:8 as identified in Criteria Report, Appendix V, Section 4.3.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C -iteria Report Number 11002s 1 B-45 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING g ggjg y gg yjg y a
| |
| 3 POWER CO.
| |
| (V HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1026 NIS displays on QDPS and The QDPS and ERFDADS displays have P,- 6. 7. 2. 4 ERFDADS identify been revised to clearly indicate P, App. Q readings for power range which NIS channel (I,II,III,IV) is Q.4.A neutron flux by letters being shown. Additionally, the A, B, C,-and D. It is . bar graph displays of power range j not clear whether RCS neutron flux have been revised to l loops or channel show the corresponding RCS loop.
| |
| separation groups are l being identified. Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION ;
| |
| ~
| |
| t O
| |
| 'V Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number l
| |
| 110028 1 B 46 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL' ROOM LIGHTING gg$jQy ggyjgy 7 POWER CO.
| |
| (G HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY B SHEET-NUMBER OBSERVATION OR Dl5PO51 TION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1033 The Proteus computer use The color convention problems S-0812 of color deviates from identified were corrected during P 6.7.2.7 i
| |
| Appendix S of the the plant startup phase. Use of P,- App . S Criteria Report. The color is being addressed during a J
| |
| S.3 most significant problem human factors review of all !
| |
| is the use of magenta Proteus and ERFDADS displays. Any for parameter bars and additional discrepancies will be text. Magenta is the documented separately and color designated for corrected following that review, Priority 1 Alarm Color usage criteria for computer Messages, displays will also be updated in b' conjunction with that review. The Both the Proteus and use of magenta for text, other ERFDADS computers use than alarm messages, has been I colors in a manner which eliminated, deviates from the criteria. Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS O Note: Reference P, is NUREG -0700 Section 6 Number P is STP C riteria Report Number 3
| |
| 110028 1 B 47 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW DHOUSTON &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA coreputars HED CATEGORY B N R OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1037 1. The CRTs on the CRTs have been provided with a P, 6. 7. 2.1 consoles have a glare non reflective covering.
| |
| P,- App Q problem due to the Subsequently, the CRTs have been Q.1.B direct streaming of reviewed; this review has light from the determined that the installed non-overhead light reflective coverings correct the fixtures, glare and reflectance problems.
| |
| : 2. The ERFDADS panel- Based on the above actions, this mounted CRTs have a HED is considered resolved for reflectance problem. Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| They act as a mirror, displaying the control room prominently, and present a distraction to the operator.
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 B-48 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR Dl5PO51 TION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1041 There is inconsistency A study has been performed to S 0812 in information identify all inconsistencies in P. 6. 7. 2.4 presentation among the Tech Spec tank level presentations 6.5.1.2 Tech Specs, CR displays, in the control room. (The P, App . Q and computer displays, inconsistency noted applies only Q.4.A For example, to tank levels. Other Tech Spec App. F 1) RWST level indicator parameters are consistently F.1.1 scale is in gallons; displayed to the operator.) In QDPS is displayed in order to allow direct comparison percent, of the Tech Spec requirement and
| |
| : 2) BAT level indicator the actual tank level, the (j scale is in gallons; criterion has been established QDPS is displayed in that all tank levels be shown in percent, the Tech Spec level unit.
| |
| For the discussion of QDPS revisions, see Disposition Note REF: CPT-1.
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Recorder and meter scales and ERFDADS tank level displays have been revised as necessary to reflect gallons in Unit 1 and in Unit 2.
| |
| h b Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028-1 B-49 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| -l v HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l LlGHTING - DESIGN REVIEW i a 1 1
| |
| .p POWER CO.
| |
| 'V HF AREA Computers _
| |
| HED CATEGORY. B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPO$lTION a REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH l 1
| |
| HED 1042 On Proteus display The graphics error has been S 0825 CW-10P (Circulating corrected, P -6.7. 2.4 i
| |
| Water Pumps Status),
| |
| P,- App. Q the motor upper guide Based on the above actions, this. l Q.4 bearing temperature is HED is considered resolved for displayed as the motor Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| thrust bearing temperature and vice versa for one of the circulating water pumps.
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS U
| |
| V Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 B.50 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlOHTING OgSlg N R E ylg W OWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY B
| |
| $HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1047 On the ERFDADS Critical The display has been modified to P, 6.7.2.4 Safety Function Display avoid the overwrite condition such P, App , Q for Containment (CSF Z), - that the data quality character Q.4 for containment wide and the units are both displayed, range water level on each train, the letter Based on the above actions, this "I" of "IN" (for inches) HED is considered resolved for is overwritten by the Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| data quality character.
| |
| O REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION O Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P3 is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s 1 B-51 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| m_s pui s= i I HOUSTON = CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1048 On the ERFDADS Normal The ERFDADS displays have been P, 6.7. 2.4 Safety Function displays modified to display the correct P, App Q for RCS Integrity and information.
| |
| Q.4 Containment (NSF P and NSF-Z respectively), Based on the above actions, this incorrect information HED is considered resolved for is displayed. Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| On NSF P, the flags for pressurizer PORV, safety, and head vent O
| |
| valves read OPN
| |
| ("open"). These should read N/CLSD
| |
| ("not closed").
| |
| On NSF Z the flag for containment ventilation isolation valve inoperability reads F/CLS (" fail to close"),
| |
| but should read INOP
| |
| (" inoperable status").
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION O Note: Reference P, is NUREC 10700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number stoo2s 1 B-52 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM G
| |
| lGH DESIGN REVIEW g POWER CO.
| |
| - \,
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE I' PARAGRAPH 4
| |
| HED 1049 On the ERFDADS Normal The display has been corrected for P -6. 7.2.4 Safety Function display the bar graph to read from 0 to P, App. Q for Core Cooling 12,000 GPM.
| |
| Q.4 (NSF C), the scale for total RHR flow is shown Based on the above actions, this as 0-1200 GPM. The HED is considered resolved for total RHR flow ranges Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| from 0 to 12,000 GPM.
| |
| l-1 REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 B-53 1 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW g POWER CO.
| |
| (v\
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1050 Values for RCB The identified parameters have P 6.7. 2.4 atmosphere radioactivity been added to the datalink from
| |
| -P,-App. Q 1evel, used on ERFDADS the Radiation Monitoring System to Q.4 Normal Safety Function ERFDADS, and the ERFDADS database displays, are not has been updated. These steps available on the provide the necessary values for datalink from the the displays.
| |
| Radiation Monitoring System to ERFDADS. Based on the above actions, this These values are the RCB HED is considered resolved for atmosphere roble gas and Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| particulate radioactivity levels, and are used on the RCS Integrity and Containment NSF displays.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION f3 V Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 11002s 1 B-54 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW t
| |
| c POWER CO.
| |
| 1 HF AREA Computers - HED CATEGORY B SHFET NUMSER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1059 On ERFDADS display The display has been revised to ,
| |
| P,- 6. 7. 2. 4 CV 02, the centrifugal show the correct valve numbers.
| |
| P - App. Q charging pump normal- The input variables have been Q.4 discharge valves are verified as correct.
| |
| shown with incorrect (reversed) valve Based on the above actions, this I numbers, llED is considered resolved for l Unit 1 and Unit 2. I l
| |
| Inputs to display may bc l incorrect as well.
| |
| 1 REF: -
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION i
| |
| f3 b Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 B-55 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| . HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG ggggg y gg yjg y a
| |
| ..<f("i POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Panel Layout HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH
| |
| 'l HED 1012 The panel demarcation The panel demarcation color pads j P, 6. 8.1. 3 color pads for the power have been revised to include the P, 6. 5.1. 3. 0 feeds on main control circuit breaker and the motor-room panel CP010 to the operated disconnect switch.
| |
| Engineered Safety l
| |
| Features (ESP) buses on Based on the above actions, thi.,
| |
| CP003 do not adequately HED is considered resolved for identify that both a Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| circuit breaker and a motor operated disconnect switch must
| |
| '-- - be closed to feed the Class 1E bus.
| |
| REF:
| |
| E0P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A
| |
| (
| |
| ' ) Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C-riteria Report Number 110028 1 B 56 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON- CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING a
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW 1 e' POWER CO. i 1
| |
| HF AREA Panel Layout HED CATEGORY B _,
| |
| SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE ;
| |
| PARAGRAPH l
| |
| HED 1014 Recorder pens for steam The recorder pen inputs havo been P, 6. 8. 2. 3 generator water level revised so that the recorder pen '
| |
| P,- 6. 5 . 2 . 3 and feedwater and steam ,
| |
| and indicator sequence are_in flow are reversed agreement, relative to the sequence l l 1 eft to right of the Based on the above actions, this j indicators located above HED is considered resolved for the recorder and showing Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| the same parameters.
| |
| 1
| |
| .O V
| |
| REF:
| |
| E0P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A l
| |
| i i
| |
| t l
| |
| l-
| |
| ,r-Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 B 57 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| l l
| |
| l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM -
| |
| UGHTlNG ggggg y ggyjg y 5 l (n)- POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Panel Layout HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH ,
| |
| l HED-1158 On the Auxiliary The meters are being reversed so .
| |
| P -6. 8. 2.1 Shutdown Panel, the the flow controller is adjacent to 6.6.3.1 RHR flow controller the flow meter and the temperature P, 6. 5. 2.1 is adjacent to the controller is adjacent to the l 6.4.5.A temperature meter, temperature meter, and the temperature I controller is adjacent The flow controller label is to the flow meter. being revised to read "HX Outlet Flow Cont".
| |
| The flow controller should be labeled
| |
| ~
| |
| "HX Outlet Flow Cont",
| |
| rather than "HX Bypass Flow Cont". ,
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATO'R C3SERVATION O
| |
| V Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number tiocast B-58 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW a
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Control / Display Integration HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITI.E PARAGRAPH HED 1044 VCT pressure and The pressure scale has been P - 6. 9.1.1 level meters on CP004 revised to use increments of 5 P, 6. 6.1.1. C have similar ranges (psig), so as to differentiate (0 90 psig and 0 100%) this meter from the level meter, with same minor scale increments The level meter has been reviewed; (i.e., 2 units), the review has determined that the installed scale is effective in differentiation between the two meters.
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 B 59 STP58 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM i LIGHTING g gggg y g g yjg y
| |
| -(]
| |
| %.)
| |
| DHOUSTON &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Control / Display Integration HED CATEGORY B SHEET NUMSFR OBSERVATION OR- DISPOSITION l REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH .
| |
| l HED 1138 The signals from two- The wiring for the SG 1evel' P, . 6. 9.1. 2 . c steam generator (SG) selector switches has been l 6.9.2.2.d narrow range water level reversed so that the left switch 6.8.2.1.a transmitters are position and the left side of the l 6.8.2.2 displayed on a dual indicator correspond to the same P, 6. 6.1. 2. C indicator. One of the transmitter. The escutcheon l
| |
| 6.6.2.2.D signals is selected for plates have been re engraved to 6.5.2.1.A use in control / recording- correspond with the rewiring.
| |
| l '
| |
| 6.5.2.2 via a selector switch immediately below the The arrangement is consistent with g i: :g indicator. However, the the steam flow and feedwater flow-l V left side of the indicator / switch pairs in the same indicator and the right area of the panel.
| |
| switch position correspond to the same Based on the above actions, this transmitter, and vice HED is considered resolved for versa, increasing the Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| likelihood of improper operator section.
| |
| l l
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION 1
| |
| l A.
| |
| b Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number l 110028 1 B 60 i
| |
| 'STP58 12/01/89 l l
| |
| l
| |
| | |
| l nouston CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW.
| |
| =Q }*0HTING POWER CO.-
| |
| CATEGORY C HED DISPOSITIONS O
| |
| 11oo2s 1 C-1 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
| |
| , LlOHTING g gggg y g g yjg y Q $0WER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY , C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION
| |
| . REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1060 Air velocities in the The HVAC design has been evaluated S-0169. control room exceed the and the system rebalanced.
| |
| P, 6.1. 5. 2.b 45 ft/ min limit and- Measurements in the Unit 1 control P, App . D - cause drafts, roorn show that air velocities at D.1.1.C work stations are negligible.
| |
| Velocities at four locations exceed the limit, but these are REF: not locations at which people are CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS stationary. Operators indicated that the air velocities at these
| |
| (~}
| |
| locations are not of concern.
| |
| -ud Measurements in the Unit 2 control room show that the air velocities are negligible throughout.
| |
| These measurements were made with two of the three HVAC trains operational; measurements with all three trains operational are being taken to verify conformance to the criterion of 45 f t/ min maximum.
| |
| Exceptions will be addressed as required.
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C -iteria Report Number 11002s 1- C-2 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW p'
| |
| Af
| |
| . D HOUSTON &
| |
| POWEFl CO.
| |
| HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERV.\ TION OR Di$PO5tTION REFERENCE CRITERIA 11TLE PARAGRAPH HED 1086 Procedures for patting Vendor supplied instructions for S 0162 on, taking off, and the self-contained breathing P -6.1.4.1.1 controlling apparatus are provided in the P, App, C protective / emergency container for each one.
| |
| C.I.F equipment vert not available. Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ; 7 CATEGORY E EVALUATI0IC
| |
| (
| |
| 1 1
| |
| l l
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG. 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028-1 C-3 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTlNG pggjQN ggyjgW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1087 The storage area and The storage area and the outside S 0164 storage cabinet for of the storage cabinet are being P 6.1.4. 3.b emergency equipment are clearly nd distinctively marked.
| |
| P,- App C not clearly and C.1.1 distinctively marked.
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS O
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 C-4 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| u .-
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM v i. LIGHTING DESIGN REVlEW
| |
| ;- POWER CO.
| |
| W rkspace HED CATEGORY C
| |
| : HF AREA N BR - 095ERV OR Dl5P051Tl0N REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH i'
| |
| HED 1143 Emergency lighting' The need for additional P 6.1. 5.4.c conditions do not meet illumination is being re-P,- App . D the 10-footcandle evaluated, together with D.1.2 minimum criterion on resolution of HED 1150 some main control pa;21 (Category B), concerning glare.
| |
| 'irfaces.
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS O Note: Reference P, is NUREG-0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C citeria Report Number 11002s 1 C-5 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM '
| |
| LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW s i'
| |
| ['T
| |
| .g)
| |
| POWER CO. !
| |
| rkspace HED CATEGORY C HF AREA ,
| |
| N 9R __ OBSERVATION Di$ POSITION.
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE i PARAGRAPH HED 1156 The annunciator This discrepancy remains under !
| |
| Pt 6.1.1.4. a procedures binders are evaluation to determine final Pa
| |
| * 6.1.1. 4. A inserted between the , disposition. l guard rail and Section D on main control panels CP001 through CP010, impeding access to the panels and manipulation of controls.
| |
| l I REF:
| |
| CATECORY E EVALUATIONS O Note: Reference P is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number 2
| |
| P2 is STP C riteria Report Number 110028-1 C6 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| l!
| |
| houston CONTROL ROOM LlGHTlNG Og$$Q N R g ylE W r POWER CO.
| |
| b]
| |
| i HF AREA Communications HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVADON OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA MRE ,
| |
| PARAGRAPH i HED 1084 There is no backup power An uninterruptible power supply P. 6. 2.1. 8. a for the H1AP four node has been installed for the MCO ,
| |
| P, 7.1. 2 telephone exchange telephone switch. Additionally, a !
| |
| center located in the new power feed has been installed l MCO. This facility is from the double ended 480V MCC in I l
| |
| housed in what appears the switchyard. The building has to be temporary been repaired.
| |
| construction, wooden-framed building that is Based on the above actions, this reported to leak. The HED is considered resolved for
| |
| , site has experienced a Unit I and Unit 2.
| |
| major " crash" of this vital communication system and consequent loss of telephone communication.
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS s
| |
| O)
| |
| 'L ' Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 1100281 C7 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| I l
| |
| CONTROL ROOM LlOHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW CT L)
| |
| DHousTON a POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY C
| |
| $HEET l NUMBEa OBSERVATlON '
| |
| OR 015P051T10N REFERENCE CRITERIA DTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1055 On the ESF Status The abbreviations used on the EST P, 6. 3. 3.4 Monitoring windows, Status Monitoring windows and in P, 8. 6.10 abbreviations / acronyms CRDR Criteria Report Appendix L !
| |
| 1 that are not in Appendix were reviewed. The window l L of the CRDR Criteria engravings having the specific l Report are used, as examples identified in the )
| |
| follows: observation have been corrected, i
| |
| SUPP, BU, RET, CSIV, Based on the above actions, this I EMERG, POS (when used HED is considered resolved for for position), EXC (used Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| d for excess), CVS (when used for Chilled Vater System), SL, SMP, CHRGR, (Additionally, a review is ongoing TVIB. of abbreviations used in the control room to verify their consistency with Appendix L.)
| |
| REF: j ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
| |
| P Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 11002s 1 C6 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LCHT'NG DESIGN REWEW O POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUWlBER 085ERVAflON OR Dl5PO5tTION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1056 Various incorrect or The labels used on the ESP Status P,.6.3.3.4 inconsistent labels are Monitoring windows specifically P, 8. 6.10 used on the ESF Status identified in the observation have Monitoring windows, been revised to correct the incorrect and inconsistent labels.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this REF: HED is considered resolved for ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| (Additionally, a review is ongoing to identify other incorrect labels and correct them.)
| |
| l
| |
| )
| |
| i
| |
| )
| |
| 1 O Note: Rwference P, is NUREG- 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Ci iteria Report Number 1100281 C9 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM .
| |
| UGHTlN3 DESIGN REWEW l
| |
| , POWER CO.
| |
| i HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY C 5HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERtA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1068 The seismic monitoring A test was performed in Unit 1 to l
| |
| P 6,3.1. 2 cystem annunciator assess audibility of the seismic )
| |
| P, 8.1 window is not monitoring panel alarm across the functional. Alarm on control room, and verified that the seismic monitoring the alarm is audible. The seismic panel may not be audible monitoring panel was modified to l I across the control room, actuate annunciator windows in i both Unit 1 and Unit 2. l (Note: Seismic l monitoring panel is Based on the above actions, this located in the Unit 1 HED is considered resolved for control room only.) Unit I and Unit 2.
| |
| )
| |
| REF: ,
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION I
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Namber 110028 1 C 10 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| Housion CONTROL ROOM LGHTtNG DESIGN REVIEW m POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY C N RR OR$ERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1089 The Tech Specs require An annunciator window is being P 6. 3.1.2 that the normal purge provided to alarm that any of j P, 8.1 containment isolation these valves is not sealed closed j valves (48 inch lines) during Modes 1 through 4. This be sealed closed during window is Priority 2 (indicating Modes 1 4. The valves that a Tech Spec LCO is not met),
| |
| are being sealed closed I by removing power from The logic for the Bypass /Inop the valve operators, status window provided for each thus removing control valve is being revised such that power as well. " Control the window is lit when the valve i power not available" is operator does not have control used for indicating power during Modes 5 or 6. In bypass / inoperable status these modes, the valve must be through ERFDADS and the operable for offsite dose ESF Status Monitoring mitigation for a fuel handling System. Thus the accident, )
| |
| ERFDADS displays and the status monitoring These same changes are being made I windows will show that on the ERFDADS displays, these four valves are
| |
| " abnormal" during the normal anticipated mode of oparation.
| |
| RSF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P, is NUREG -0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 1100281 C 11 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING g gggg y g g yjg g POWER CO.
| |
| (G'l l 1
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1129 1.asphox SM23 has three These windows are illuminated when l P, 6. 3. 3.4 windows with engravings any steam generator has a 2 out-P, 8. 6.10 of " AUX FPMP START BLKD of 4 low low level signal present TRAIN A (B, C)". It is and the reset button has been not clear what is meant pushed for that actuation train when these windows are (A, B, C).
| |
| illuminated.
| |
| The engravings for these windows have been revised to read:
| |
| l l REF: SG 14 ID LVL r]
| |
| U OPERATOR COMMENT DURING ESFAS B1ID SPDS MAN IN THE LOOP TRAIN A (B, C)
| |
| VALIDATION .
| |
| Based on the above actions, this l
| |
| HED is considered resolved for j Unit 1 and Unit 2. l l
| |
| 1 l
| |
| s Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 1too2s 1 0 12 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM :
| |
| LOHTING pg$$QN ggylgg
| |
| ( DHOUSTON &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY C i
| |
| 5HEET NUMBEn ORSERVATION OR DISPOSITION !
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1140 The annunciator windows The ERFDADS software has been P 6.3.3.2.e for AW pump low revised to suppress the alarm when P, 8. 6.1 discharge pressure are , the pump is not running, thus 8.6.9 continuously in alarm removing the nuisance alarms for when the pumps are the annunciator windows and the l
| |
| turned off. This ERFDADS display.
| |
| condition also exists on ERFDADS display AF-01. Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for j Unit 1. These same changes are being implemented for Unit 2.
| |
| 0 REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION (In addition, the Annunciator Task Force has identified other
| |
| " nuisance" alarms. Those alarms are being resolved.)
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG. 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 C 13 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING p gggg y g g yjg g POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1141 On channels II and III, The ESF Status Monitoring P, 6. 3. 3. 2. e the Tech Specs require lampboxes for channels II and III 6.3.3.4.a availability of one are being revised to show a single
| |
| ?,-8.6.9 battery charger, window for both chargers. The 8.6.10 Mechanical interlocks ERFDADS software is being revised are provided on the such that the Bypass /Inop window switchboard breakers is lit when both chargers for that such that only one channel are not operating, g charger can be connected Similarly, the ERFDADS displays to the switchboard at a are being revised to show "INOP" time. However, when a when both chargers are not U charger .is not connected operating.
| |
| to the switchboard, its Bypass /Inop window is lit, incorrectly indicating that conditions do not meet the operability requirements of the Tech Specs.
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION O <
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG- 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 1100281 C 14 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM Ll3HTlNG ggggg y g g yjg g
| |
| .n POWER CO.
| |
| U HF AREA controls _ HED CATEGORY C
| |
| -SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1031 Legend pushbuttons on The " REM /1hC" label has been P 6.4.3.3.b the turbine control revised to "TURB/CR", to provide P,* App . E panels for SCFP 11, 12, positive indication of the active App. H and 13 on panel CP006 do control station. The
| |
| * RESET" H.3.2 not conform to the label has been revised to " LATCH",
| |
| convention of labels, to be consistent with the mein The labels provided read turbine labeling in a similar
| |
| " REM / LOC", where: application.
| |
| REM - Control at turbine Based on the above actions, this IDC - Control in control HED is considered resolved for l
| |
| 'O yf room Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| l l
| |
| Another pushbutton is i labeled " RESET", meaning I latch and reset.
| |
| l REF: )
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION 1
| |
| l O Note: Reference P, is NUREC- 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s 1 C-15 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTlNG ggggg y g g yjg y :
| |
| ^
| |
| L (u,S,- POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Controls HED CATEGORY C 5HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION
| |
| < OR DISPOSITION l REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1083 The integrated Modifications for the P,.6.4.1.2 communications consoles communications consoles are being l P,.6.2.1.6 have three toggle developed for evaluation and switches that are implementation so that two subject to inadvertent distinct actions are required for actuation. This will actuation of these alarms.
| |
| result in the actuation
| |
| . of false main plant alarms as follows:
| |
| { 1. Evacuation l
| |
| : 2. Fire
| |
| : 3. Reactor Contain-ment Building Evacuation REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS l
| |
| l.
| |
| l l
| |
| l !
| |
| i l l
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG- 0700 Section 6 Number
| |
| ! P, is STP Ci iteria Report Number I
| |
| 1100281 C 16 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG gggjg y ggyjg g POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY C SHEET -
| |
| NUMBER OBSERVATION l OR Dl5PO51 TION i REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1015 The Emergency Operating The circuit has been revised to j P,- 6 . 5 .1.1. a Procedures require a provide a " system start sealed in" l P, 6. 3.1. 2 check to determine if output. A red light has been j the reactor coolant added above the reactor coolant
| |
| )
| |
| makeup system is on, to makeup system control switch to l provide automatic makeup indicate that the " system start" to the volume control signal has been sealed in.
| |
| tank. Currently there is no means of Based on the above actions, this I indication in the HED is considered resolved for
| |
| ,_ control room that Unit 1 and Unit 2. ;
| |
| confirms the status of )
| |
| the reactor coolant makeup system.
| |
| REF:
| |
| EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A Note: Reference P, is NUREG- 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Ci iteria Report Number 110028 1 C-17 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i CONTROL ROOM UGHTING g g3lQ N g g yjg g
| |
| / DHOUSTON a POWER CO. .
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY C l 5HEET NUMBER OB5ERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH I
| |
| HED 1018 There is inadequate Revisions have been made to use P,. 6. 5.1.1 feedback to show that the ESF Status Monitoring system-P, 6. 3.1. 2 depression of an ESPAS actuate red lights to provide the 6.3.1.3 signal reset pushbutton feedback. Reset of an ESPAS has reset the signal, signal results in the red light The reset pushbuttons being extinguished.
| |
| and the status lights are on well-separated Based on the above actions, this panels. HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| E0P VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A Note: Reference P, is NUREG- 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Ci iteria Report Number 110028 1 C-18 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING pgggg y p g yjg y a
| |
| POWER CO, HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OR$ERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH Hr0 1025 The SG PORVs and the ECW The QDPS software controlling P. 6. 5. 3.1 valves controlling flow valve position indicating lights P, App. H to the essential on the Operator Interface Modules H.1 chillers are controlled has been revised to make the by the QDPS. Panel setpoints adjustable. Initial indications (valve setpoints are 5% and 95%.
| |
| open/ closed lights) are derived from the analog Based on the above actions, this signal indicating valve HED is considered resolved for position, which is not Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| repeatable; the software setpoints of 0.5% and i 99.5% for fully closed and fully open, respectively, are too restrictive, such that )
| |
| the valve position l lights may never i I
| |
| indicate a fully open or closed position, 1 l REF:
| |
| STARTUP OBSERVATION O
| |
| d Note: Reference P is i NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number stoo2s 1 C 19 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM i UGHTING DESIGN REWEW j
| |
| r~N POWER CO. l C
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY C I
| |
| J SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH )
| |
| 1 HED-1032 During plant startup, A direct readout of the P. - 6 . 5 .1.1 the W header pressure differential pressure has been 6.8.1.2 aust be compared to the provided on a Proteus computer P, 6. 3.1. 2 steam header pressure, display.
| |
| App. F The indicators are not ]
| |
| F.1 in close proximity to 6.5.1.2 each other, being on two adjacent panels and in I two sections of the panels (Section D of CP006 and Section B of CP007). The pressure differential for a given procedure step must be determined to be 45 psid or greater. The minimura scale increments are 50 psi, rendering "x + 45 psig" readable for only a few values of x.
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION 1
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number l
| |
| P, is STP Criteria Report Number
| |
| ( 110028 1 C 20 SfP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| l 1
| |
| HOusioN CONTROL ROOM i LIGHTING ggggg y p g yjg g POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA visual Displays HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITCRIA TITLE PARAGRAPH {
| |
| HED 1103 Certaln recorders have Designation of engineering units P, 6. 5.1.1 no indications of for each pen is being added to P, 6. 3.1. 2 engineering units on the recorders on which this scales, information is not provided. i l
| |
| l l
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION i
| |
| l l
| |
| O Note: Reference P iis NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 C-21 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW 1 G POWER CO.
| |
| 'U HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY C l
| |
| i SMEET NUNitER ORSERVAflON DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE J' PARAGPAPH HED 1139 The containment moisture The dewpoint temperature indicator P 6. 5.1.1.b indicator is a devpoint nameplate has been revised to read 6.5.1.2.b temperature indicator.
| |
| * DEWPOINT" rather than " MOISTURE".
| |
| 1 6.6.3.2 reading in 'F. To As a temporary measure, a ]
| |
| P, . 6 . 3 .1. 2 determine whether the psychrometric chart has been k App. F moisture level in provided in the control room to F.1.1 containment is changing, facilitate conversion.
| |
| 6.4.5 the operator must take readings from this Based on the above actions, this instrument and from the Category C HED is considered '
| |
| . dry bulb temperature resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| indicator adjacent to
| |
| * it, and use a psychrometric chart to further evaluation is being convert this information performed to determine the
| |
| - into moisture levels. feasibility of providing an indicator reading directly in The discrepancy of the relative humidity, to resolve the inaccurate meter Category D HED.
| |
| nameplate and the discrepancy of requiring mental conversion are considered HED Category C.
| |
| (Cont.)
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 C 22 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LWTIN3 DESIGN REWEW s
| |
| O HF AREA visual Displays HED CATEGORY _ C fMEET NUMBEg 095ERVADON
| |
| ,RE,fEf, CRITERIA TITLE g
| |
| The discrepancy of not providing an indicator for reading directly in relative humidity is considered HED Category D.
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION O
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002a 1 C 23 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| l r
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM i LGH G DESIGN REWEW
| |
| , ,l s l POWER CO.
| |
| (J ,
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY C
| |
| $NEET NUMgga OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH i
| |
| HED 1017 The mimic of panel CP004 The discharge and bypass valve P 6.6.6.4 shows the normal switches for charging pump 1A have P 6.4.1.1 discharge valves of the been interchanged for fidelity to App. N centrifugal charging the system arrangement and to N.1.2 pumps as the normal remain consistent with the switch discharge valve for one arrangement for pump 1B. Also, pwep and as the bypass the check valves in the discharge valve for the other header have been added to the pump. Conversely, the mimic, bypass valves are shown as a bypass valve for Based on the above actions, this one pump and as the HED is considered resolved for normal discharge valve Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| for the other pump.
| |
| REF:
| |
| l EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C"iteria Report Number 1100281 C 24 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING pg$$g y p g yjg y DHOusioN &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids _ HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH j I
| |
| HED 1019 On panel CP005 the The switch escutcheons have been 1 l
| |
| P, 6. 6. 3. 2 pressuriter pressure changed to read " UNBLOCK blank- l l
| |
| P, 6. 4. 5 Safety Injection (SI) . BihCK" to provide better j block / reset switch definition of the switch function; l 1
| |
| labeling is confusing, i.e., that the left position l The escutcheon reads removes the signal block. The l
| |
| ' RESET blank BLOCK" pressurizer pressure SI block and (three position switch). low steamline pressure SI block switches have been changed in this j fashion.
| |
| REF: Based on ths above actions, this E0P VALIDATION REPORT HED is considered resolved for APPENDIX A Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| I 8 Note: Reference P is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C -iteria Report Number 110028 1 C 25 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW GUGHDNG a POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY C N BER OBSERv 0R Dl5P051 DON REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAG9APH HED 1020 Labeling of power Labeling of the power lockout P 6.6.3.1 lockout control switches switches has been revised to P, 6.4. 5 for the Safety Injection identify the specific service.
| |
| (SI) system requires additional information Based on the above actions, this on the nameplates in HED is considered resolved for order to differentiate Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| between the accumulator discharge isolation valves and the hoi leg e isolation valves.
| |
| REF:
| |
| EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A 8 Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
| |
| . UGHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| l HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY C N gn OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA 11TLE PARAGRAPH HED 1021 The train A, B, and C The escutcheons have been revised P, 6. 6. 3. 2 Safety Injection to read " RESET".
| |
| P, 6. 4. 5 block / reset pushbutcons have confusing labeling. Based on the above actions, this The escutcheon reads HED is considered resolved for
| |
| " BLOCK / RESET". Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| (See also HED 1130, Category C.)
| |
| REF:
| |
| EOP '/ALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A l
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 C 27 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| h CONTROL ROOM j LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW i GHOUSTON a POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY C
| |
| $NEET NUMRER ORSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE :
| |
| PARAGRAPH HED 1057 The function of the A W An escutcheon has been added to F, 6.6.1.1 pump turbine trip indicate the function of the 6.6.3.2 pushbutton is not pushbutton (i.e., ' TRIP"). I P, 6.4.1.1 indicated.
| |
| 6.4.5 Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2. ,
| |
| REF:
| |
| ; EOP VALIDATION REPORT
| |
| ,- APPENDIX A ;
| |
| p
| |
| ')J l
| |
| l f
| |
| l 8 Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C -iteria Report Number 110028 1 C-28 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
| |
| : Ll3HTING DESIGN REVIEW a
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Labels and location Aids HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION ON REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1058 The RCS teroperature The recorder inputs have been P.- 6. 6. 3. 3 recorders have verified and the labels have been P, 6. 4. 5 inconsistent panel changed accordingly.
| |
| labels and pen labels.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this RED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| EOP VALIDATION REPORT APPENDIX A g
| |
| 8 Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C'.itoria Report Numbet 11oo2s 1 C 29 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| I i
| |
| i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
| |
| ,.- g I POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY C N 8R Ot$ERVATION ON REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAgnApg HED.1077 Demarcation zone coding Demarcation and mimic options to P.- 6. 6.1.1 and labeling are not provide visual distinction between 6.6.6.2 adequate to properly trains of the same system and ]
| |
| 6.8.1.3 identify system and between systens are being l 1
| |
| P,. 6. 4.1. 2 train configuration on developed for evaluation and ,
| |
| App. N panel CP022 in the area implementation.
| |
| N.1.1 for CR/EAB HVAC. ;
| |
| 6.5.1.3 i
| |
| l I .
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OMERVATION .
| |
| i O Note: Reference P, is NUREG -0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number tiews1 C 30 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING pgggg y g g yjg g
| |
| (~]
| |
| %J POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR Dl5PO51 TION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE l PARAGRAPH ;
| |
| llED 1078 Temporary labels have Labels have been re engraved to P. 6. 6. 5.1 been added for power permanently add the power source l 6.6.3.1 source identification on , of the items identified in a 6.6.3.3 the lower left hand survey of the control panels. An i P, 6.4. 5 corner of main control ongoing program is under way to panel labels, to correct ensure that power sources are inaccurate information identified on nameplates, in or to provide missing accordance with the criteria.
| |
| infermation. l l
| |
| \ l l REF: ]
| |
| ENGINEERI!;C OBSERVATION j
| |
| 1 Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 C 31 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTnNG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA 1.abels and Loeation Aids HED CArcGORY C
| |
| (
| |
| SHEET NUMBEg OSSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1080 The controller for Labels are being provided to P. 6. 6. 3. 2 Reactor Coolant cloacly indicate what the 6.6.3.8 Purification flow controller action is; i.e., "0 PEN" P, 6 . 4 . 5 control does not or "C145E" the controlled valve.
| |
| indicate valve open/close direction.
| |
| REF:
| |
| [r a OPERATOR OBSERVATIGN F m w
| |
| W k
| |
| P
| |
| =_-
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 1100281 C 32 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM :
| |
| LtGHTING DESIGN REVIEW (mv)
| |
| D HOUSTON a
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| f HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY C SHEET Nugggga 095ER ATION ,
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH . ,
| |
| HED.1105 Color coded mimics (red, Criteria ar* being developed for P,.6.6.6.4.a blue, yellow) have been appropriate and consistent use of 6.5.1.6 implemented on panel train related color coding of 6.8.1.3 CP001 for the SI/RHR mimics throughout the control P, App. N System. The CCW, ECW, room. After the criteria have
| |
| - N.1.2 ESF bus, and HVAC been developed, the mimics in the App. S systems are not color control room will be modified to 5.4.G coded ir. the sane be consistent with the criteria.
| |
| I 6.5.1.3 fashion, j (Se.* aise F'4D-1091. Category D.)
| |
| ! i
| |
| ; Or REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION
| |
| ?
| |
| I l
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C citeria Report Number 11002s.1 C 33 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i l
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l UGHTING DESlGN REWEW
| |
| & I
| |
| (#)
| |
| %J POWER CO.
| |
| l HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY ,, C f i
| |
| SHEET :
| |
| NUMBEn OBSERVATION OR DISPO51T10N !
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1130 Several signals causing All reset pushbuttons on the main P, 6. 6. 3. 2 ESFAS actuations can be control board have been reviewed P, 6.4. 5 reset, with that action for function. Each has been ]
| |
| also blocking the identified as to whether actuation signal, such depressing the pushbutton will as the SI signal. These block the actuating signal, or )
| |
| reset pushbuttons say whether t'ne actuating signal must ]
| |
| " RESET" and are not be removed prior to reset of the differentiated from the signal, reset pushbuttons for {
| |
| signals that carbot bc The latter group of re set f^s l
| |
| Q reset ur.til the pashbuttons continues to bc )
| |
| actuating signal is labeled " RESET". The forner group removed, has been revised such that th3 i escutt.heon reads:
| |
| RESET REF: (BLOCR)
| |
| OPEP.ATOR OBSERVATION ,
| |
| DURING SPDS MAN IN THE. Based on the above actions, this LOOP VALIDATION HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| (See also HED 1021, Category C.)
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, i s .* T P C riteria Report Number 11oo2s 1 C 34 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| c i
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
| |
| (~~Y POWER CO.
| |
| L)
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1133 On CP001, the switches The switch labels have been'
| |
| - P - 6. 6. 3.1 for the SI check valve revised to provide accurate 6.6.3.2 test valves have labels descriptions of the valve service.
| |
| 6.4.2.2 that are inaccurate for 6.8.2.1 the valve service. Based upon the above actions, the P, 6.4.1.1 Additionally, the Category C HED is conridered 6.4.5 switches are not resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| 6.2.1.9 arranged in a consistent 6.5.2.1 manner.
| |
| The switch and lamp locations will The discrepancy of be evaluated for revision to A . inaccurate labels is achieve a consistent arrangement, considered HED as part of the plant modification Category C. process.
| |
| The discrepancy of inconsistent switch locations is considered HED Category D.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 C-35 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| k HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
| |
| .'qfm) . POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBEg OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH-HED 1145 Some switches The escutcheon plates for these P 6.6. 3.2.a controlling jog valves switches are being re engraved to P, 6.4. 5. A are not identified as indicate the jogging operation, such, leading to misoperation by not holding the switch for a sufficient amount of time to achieve desired operation.
| |
| ' .q O) ;
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION I
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C::iteria Report Number 11oo2s 1 C-36 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| . .a, .--. - x a -
| |
| 1 l
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l
| |
| ' LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW a
| |
| POWER CO, 7
| |
| I l HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY c
| |
| ]
| |
| 1 SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1160 On the transfer switch Demarcation is being provided to P, 6,6,6,2. a panels and auxiliary associate related switches P,- App. N shutdown panels, there ,
| |
| together; striping is being used N.1.1 is no coding or other to show that the transfer switch identification showing and control switch are one above which are transfer the other on the panel, switches and which are control switches to help differentiate them, or associate one with the other, REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION 1
| |
| 1 O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number l' 110028 1 C-37 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| d HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE '
| |
| PARAGRAPH
| |
| -HED 1022 QDPS display labeling For the discussion of QDPS P, 6. 7.2.4 errors have been revisions, see Disposition Note P3 App. Q identified during the CPT 1.
| |
| .Q.4- QDPS V6V process. These errors also occur in The ERFDADS displays have been ERFDADS displays that reviewed, and the displays were developed based modified consistently with changes upon the QDPS displays. being incorporated into QDPS.
| |
| D$ REF-U QDPS V&V
| |
| ,G
| |
| 'V Note: Reference P. is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C citeria Report Number 110028-1 C 38 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL' ROOM LlOHTING g gglQ N g g yjg g i POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers - HED CATEGORY C
| |
| ' SHEET NUMBEn OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1023 QDPS display labeling The'CRDR Criteria Report, Appendix P,- 6. 7. 2. 4 inconsistencies with L, has been revised.
| |
| ' P, App . Q Appendix L of the Q.4 Criteria Report have Based on the above actions, this been identified during HED is considered resolved for i
| |
| the QDPS V6V process. Unit 1 and Unit 2. j REF: l QDPS V6V l
| |
| )
| |
| A V Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C .iteria Report Number 110028 1 C 39 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW A POWER CO.
| |
| h HF AREA Computers C HED CATEGORY SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION '
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1024 The display on QDPS does The QDPS displays have been P, 6. 7. 2.4 not accurately reflect revised to provide a more accurate P, App. Q the actual flow rates indication at low flow rates, i Q.4 for AFW, RHR, ECW, and When the flow signal falls below a !
| |
| CCW flows when the preset low limit, the display i actual flow is at or reads "***". l near zero.
| |
| Because the flow indications are datalinked to ERFDADS, appropriate l
| |
| changes are being incorporated in REF: ERFDADS to eliminate the OPERATOR OBSERVATION misleading flow indication.
| |
| l l
| |
| l O
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s 1 C-40 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING gggggy ggyjgg POWER CO.
| |
| ( .
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMRER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1027 The QDPS and/or ERFDADS The ERFDADS displays have been P, 6. 7. 2.4 displays contain revised to correct all problems P3 App. Q inconsistencies in noted. When the operator action Q.4 nomenclature and point ranges were revised, the labeling, displays were reviewed to assure that background information on the Additionally, the display was not being overwritten, operator action points for six variables must The QDPS displays have been be available over a revised to correct the different range than inconsistencies in nomenclature
| |
| 'V currently specified, and labeling noted (missing arrowhead, missing units). The QDPS software has been revised as required to permit adjustment ,
| |
| REF: within the needed range for ENGINEERING OBSERVATION operator action points.
| |
| For discussion of remaining QDPS revisions, see Disposition Note CPT-1.
| |
| ! A i
| |
| Nute: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number i P, is STP Criteria Report Number l
| |
| 110028-1 C-41 STP59 12/01/89 1
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REWEW 1 Il $OwER CO.
| |
| %/ '
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C ;
| |
| l I
| |
| 5HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION p REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH l
| |
| HED 1036 The various computer The abbreviations used on the i P, 6. 7. 2.4 displays use computer displays and the P, App Q abbreviations that do abbreviations listed in CRDR j l
| |
| Q.4 not comply with the Criteria Report Appendix L are l
| |
| ! Criteria Report being reviewed. As appropriate, l l Appendix L. the displays are being revised and i l
| |
| l the abbreviations list is being l l_ updated, i l i l
| |
| REF:
| |
| l
| |
| % CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS l
| |
| .J '
| |
| I l
| |
| F i i
| |
| l l
| |
| l 1
| |
| l J
| |
| l i
| |
| 1 O Note: Reference P, is NURE(l-0700 Section 6 Number l
| |
| l P, is STP Criteria Report Number 1 1100281 C 42 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON' CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
| |
| _ f- . POWER CO.
| |
| 'k HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION .
| |
| DISPOSITION OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1038 The plant computer CRTs have been adjusted and tubes S-0825 displays are generally have been replaced as required.
| |
| P, 6. 7_. 2.1 good but problems with (Display color quality was-6.7.2.4 color quality and degraded due to poor CRT 6.7.2.7 various display and menu adjustment and " burned-in" tubes. )
| |
| P, App . Q discrepancies were The identified display Q.1 noted, discrepancies are being resolved i Q.4 by ongoing programs for display Q.7 review and revision.
| |
| REF: '
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 C-43 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON ~ CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING gggggy ggyggy
| |
| - POWER CO.
| |
| . HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION i REFERENCE - CRITERIA TITLE -
| |
| PARAGRAPH l
| |
| HED 1040 The ERFDADS and Proteus An engineering review is being i l
| |
| SiO854 computers use performed to evaluate the current P 6.7.2.4 inconsistent labeling. displays in the computer systems, 6.7.2.7 The use in Proteus of a and determine how they can be P, App . Q full background color improved and made more consistent.
| |
| Q.4 with black letters is The display criteria and the l Q.7 good, but violates displays themselves will then be criteria in the choice revised. The displays-will be of background color, made as consistent as possible based upon the differing machine The ERFDADS use of cyan capabilities, is not quickly distinguished from the l
| |
| I remainder of the display.
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS
| |
| 'v Note: Reference P, is NUREG -0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 C-44 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING ggggg y gg yjg y a
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| Ys)
| |
| (
| |
| :ss HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET
| |
| - NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1064- Transfer switch labels ERFDADS transfer switch position P, 6. 7. 2.4 and ERFDADS labels are descriptions are being revised to P,- App . Q inconsistent for switch use CR for control room, ASP for Q.4 positions. Transfer auxiliary shutdown panel, ZLP for switch escutcheons use another local panel, and X PNL for CR for control room ASP the transfer switch panel. These for auxiliary shutdown revisions make the ERFDADS panel, ZLP xxx for descriptions as close as possible another local panel, and to the transfer switch LOCAL for control escutcheons, given the computer occurring at that same descriptor limitations.
| |
| l transfer switch panel.
| |
| ERFDADS uses only LOCAL and REMOTE.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
| |
| i L
| |
| O V Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number l
| |
| P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 C-45 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW S
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| b HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY ,,,_ C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH ,
| |
| HED-1065 The identical displays ERFDADS algorithms are being P,- 6. 7. 2.4. e in QDPS and ERFDADS may revised to be consistent with P, App . Q show a different value QDPS. In the interim, use of Q.4.E and/or quality for a substitute values is being calculated parameter administrative 1y controlled; the because the algorithms cluster limits and referee values performing the were chosen to minimite the calculations are not the differences in the information same in the two systems, displayed.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION r\
| |
| V Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P2 is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s 1 C 46 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING ggggg y g g yjg y POWER CO.
| |
| ' HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET .
| |
| NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH 1
| |
| l HED 1070 It is difficult to Colors are generally P 6. 7. 2.1 distinguish between distinguishable from the intended 6.7.2.7 green-and yellow status viewing distance. CRTs have been P, App . Q boxes on the ERFDADS readjusted to alleviate Q.1 displays, distinguishability problems. A Q.7 problem regarding residual l magnetism in certain panels has been identified. This residual REF: magnetism is a significant 1
| |
| SPDS AUDIT contributor to the color problem 1 l
| |
| noted. Panel degaussing is being performed. The symbols are being evaluated, with the aim of ;
| |
| differentiating the status I conditions both by color and by j shape.
| |
| ('')\
| |
| m Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 C-47 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING - g gggg y pg yjg g POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH
| |
| .HED 1072 The SPDS Critical Safety The SPDS Man-in the Loop P.- 6. 7. 2. 7 Function displays do not Validation has been performed; P,- App. Q change color based on evaluation of color changes based Q.7 parameter being in alarm upon alarm condition was performed condition.. as part of this validation. Refer to the discussion provided for HED-1121 (Category C) for the final disposition. ;
| |
| REF-SPDS AUDIT O
| |
| , d i
| |
| I 1
| |
| l l
| |
| 1 l
| |
| i O
| |
| Note: Reference P is i NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 C-48 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW f -(
| |
| 1].
| |
| D LIGHTING&
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBEA OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1075 AW flow indication on The controls design for the A W P, 6.7.2.4 QDPS may go offscale flow regulating valves has been 6.5.1.2- high during AW revised, so that flow limiting to P - App. Q actuation. If actuated below 700 gpm (the upper limit of Q.4 by SG low low level, the QDPS A W flow scale) is App. F automatic flow control effective continuously. Thus, the F.1.3 .may terminate while flow flow will be on scale at all indication is still times, offscale high, if low-low level signal clears. Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for O
| |
| Q Unit 2. 'These same changes are being implemented for Unit 1.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
| |
| l I
| |
| l l
| |
| NJ Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C: iteria Report Number 110028 1 C-49 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM uaHTING DESIGN REVIEW a
| |
| - - POWER CO.
| |
| \s HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBEg OBSERVATION ~
| |
| OR DISPO51 TION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1082 On the ERFDADS Normal Modifications to the ERFDADS P 6.7.2.4 Safety Function software are being performed to 6.7.2.6 Containment display ensure that all acEt$d valves P,- App . Q (NSF Z), the "INOP" are included in the calculation Q.4 ,
| |
| flags for containment for the display flags.
| |
| Q.6 isolation status are not driven by the proper valves (i.e., all valves receiving Phase A or Phase B or CVI signals).
| |
| O b
| |
| l REF: l ENGINEERING OBSERVATION t
| |
| V Note: Reference P, is NUREG 07,00 Section 6 Number l P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 C 50 l STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW a
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C N 8R OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH- 1 HED 1094 ECW flow displays on The QDPS and ERFDADS displays have P -6. 7. 2.4 QDPS and ERFDADS use been revised to use appropriate 6.5.1.2 inappropriate ranges: flow ranges for ECW flows.
| |
| P, App. Q - too wide on flow to CCW Q.4 heat exchanger, too Based on the above actions, this App. F narrow on flows to HED is considered resolved for F.1.3 essential chillers. Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| l l .REF:
| |
| STARTUP OBSERVATION i
| |
| s Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 C-51 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING a
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| A(N)l v
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C i
| |
| 5HEET- l NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1097 There is confusion as to The ERFDADS keyboards /CRT Pi - 6. 7.1. 5 which CRT is being naneplates have been revised to P, App . P selected through the correct the problems noted. The P.2 ERFDADS keyboard. CRT nameplates have been revised Select key.keycaps are to include the identifying number j l
| |
| engraved with the last eng::aved on the keycaps,
| |
| .part of the equipment numbers for the The left-to right sequence of the controlled CRTs. keys is being revised to j i
| |
| However, those numbers correspond to the CRT spatial l
| |
| L are not included on the arrangement, j
| |
| \ CRT nameplates. )
| |
| Additionally, the left-to right sequence of the select keys on the keyboard is reversed when compared with the CRT spatial arrangement.
| |
| l-REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION i
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C:-iteria Report Number
| |
| ' 11oo2s 1 C 52 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW OWER CO.
| |
| l HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1109 The SPDS displays Additional trip related logic is P,- 6. 7. 2. 4 incorrect / misleading being added so SPDS can detect ,
| |
| P, 11.1.1 safe g function status that the plant should have tripped l 11.1.9 information during ATWS and automatically provide Critical App Q conditions. Since the Safety Function status indication, j Q.4.A reactor trip breakers 1
| |
| l remain closed during an l ATWS the Normal Safety l
| |
| Function status boxes remain on the SPDS displays instead of the Critical Safety Function j status boxes required post-trip.
| |
| \ l REF: j SPDS MAN-IN-THE-LOOP l VALIDATION i l
| |
| l Note: Reference P, is NUREC -0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 C-53 i
| |
| STP59 12/01/89 1
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING ggggg y g g yjg y q &
| |
| Q POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C , ___
| |
| SHEET NUMBER - OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGAAPH HED 1111 SPDS top level display The CSF top level display bar P,- 6. 7. 2. 5 bar heights mislead the heights are being revised to P,- 11.1.1 Unit Supervisor / Shift provide different bar heights 11.1.3.3 Technical Advisor, based upon the CSF status. Thus App Q resulting occasionally the CSF status box color and the I Q.5 in use of the bar height bar height will provide consistent rather than status box priority information to control l color, and consequent room personnel, incorrect determination of plant safety status, tO G'
| |
| l REF: 1 SPDS MAN IN THE LOOP VALIDATION l
| |
| O b
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG-0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s 1 C-54 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW' POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C N BR OBSERVATION DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1112 The Critical Safety The CSF-C EOP status tree has been P,- 6. 7 . 2 . 4 Function Core Cooling revised to replace the wording 6.7.2.5 (CSF C) E0P status tree , " Upper Plenum" with " Plenum".
| |
| P,-11.1.1 - wording " Upper P1enum" ;
| |
| App. Q does not match either Based on the above actions, this Q.4 CSF C display wording HED is considered resolved for Q.5 " Plenum" or " Upper Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| Head".
| |
| O
| |
| 'D REF:
| |
| SPDS MAN-IN-THE LOOP
| |
| ; VALIDATION l
| |
| l l
| |
| l 1
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number '
| |
| P, is STP Criteria Report Number 1100281 C 55 STP59 12/01/89 l
| |
| | |
| . HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
| |
| , POWER CO.
| |
| (_/
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1115 The abbreviation used The engineering units for P -6.7. 2.4 for "Microcuries" is not radioactivity concentration values-6,6.3.3 consistent throughout on ERFDADS displays are being P, App . Q the SPDS displays, revised to "uci/ce".
| |
| Q.4 6.4.6 App. L REF:
| |
| SPDS MAN-IN THE LOOP VALIDATION i
| |
| 1 l
| |
| l l
| |
| >^s V Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 C-56 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING gggjg y gg yjg g h POWER CO.
| |
| \ _)
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHF.ET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR - DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH
| |
| -HED-1116 The failure of the SPDS The NSF displays are being revised P, 6. 7. 2. 5 to change automatically to display the information F.X TRIP P, 11.1.1 from Normal Safety SIGNAL prominently, above the 11.1.4 Function displays to safety function status indicators, 11.1.9 Critical Safety Function to indicate to control room 11.2.1.1 displays following personnel that the CSF displays reactor trip causes data should be used. Displays called to be displayed that is by pushing the SPDS display keys not consistent with will continue to be the CSF plant conditions. display when the reactor trip
| |
| , breakers are open and the NSF display when the breakers are closed.
| |
| REF:
| |
| SPDS MAN-IN-THE LOOP VALIDATION A
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C citeria Report Number 110028 1 C-57 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| ? /
| |
| i 1
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM )
| |
| LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW S l POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C I
| |
| $HEET NUMBEg OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE '
| |
| PARAGRAPH HED 1117 Inappropriate spacing The CSF Integrity display is being P,. 6. 7. 2. 5 exists on the SPDS revised to provide appropriate P, App. Q Critical Safety Function spacing.
| |
| Q.5 '(CSF) Integrity display:
| |
| the "AUCT LO T W/R" l- label and value are too close to the " cold overpressure limits" plot. This causes confusion as to the q units on the plant U operational limits trend plot and the title of the cold overpressure limits trend plot.
| |
| REF:
| |
| SPDS MAN-IN THE LOOP VALIDATION Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C iteria Report Number 110028 1 C 58 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i HOUSTON. CONTROL ROOM :
| |
| LIGHT lNG g gggg y g g yjg g f')
| |
| (_,
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C t
| |
| $HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION <
| |
| OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1118 The SPDS displays RCS The SPDS display is being revised P,- 6. 7. 2. 4 subcooling with a to suppress the minus sign and P, App . Q negative value, while display the absolute value of Q.4 the EOPs consider RCS subcooling, since the_ labels ,
| |
| subcooling as having a "SUBCOOL" and "SUPERHEAT" are l
| |
| positive value, provided. These revisions are
| |
| ; being made throughout the computer system displays.
| |
| REF:
| |
| i p SPDS MAN IN THE-LOOP
| |
| ?() VALIDATION i
| |
| C' v Note: Reference P, is NUREC-0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number ;
| |
| i 11oo2s 1 C-59 STP59 12/01/89 1
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING g gggg y g g yjg y q &
| |
| ,, (g POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMSEA OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1119 The SPDS alarms are The SPDS is being revised to group P,- 6. 7. 2. 5 difficult to the SPDS alarms separately from 6.7.2.6 acknowledge. Failure of the non SPDS alarms to simplify P, 11.1.1 the operator to acknowledgement.
| |
| 11.1.2 acknowledge the alarms
| |
| =
| |
| App. Q- voids the "reflash" Q.5 feature of the Q.6 annunciator.
| |
| REF:
| |
| SPDS MAN IN THE LOOP VALIDATION O
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s 1 C-60 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG g gggg y g g yjg y f"
| |
| -t POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CMEGORY c SHEET NUMRER ORSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1120 The SPDS is complex in The features of the SPDS are being P. None relation to the training simplified via resolution of the frequency. Operators various HEts against the SPDS P, 11.1. 3. 3 ,
| |
| 11.2.5 have difficulty (refer to HEDs 1108, 1109, lill, remembering quality tag 1116, 1118, 1121, and 1123). The 4 t
| |
| definitions, usage quarterly training frequency is during ATWS and adverse seen as appropriate for licensed containment events, reactor operators, safety function bar height meaning, etc.
| |
| 1 (D l
| |
| %)
| |
| REF:
| |
| SPDS MAN-IN THE LOOP VALIDATION O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 C-61 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM l3HTING ggggg y gg yjg y I'\ POWER CO.
| |
| V HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH i I
| |
| HED 1121 The usage of color is The CSF status box color is )
| |
| P,- 6. 7. 2. 7.k inconsistent within the determined using a status tree, l
| |
| P, App. Q SPDS: on Normal Safe.ty which evaluates several parameters Q.7.K Function displays, against setpoints in a logic tree parameters in alarm are calculation. The colors of the l yellow and magenta; on CSF parameter digital values and Critical Safety Function bars are being revised to show displays, parameters in which parameters have resulted in alarm remain salmon. the status box color.
| |
| Additionally, the SPDS is being revised so that the NSF displays REF: show alarm colors only when the SPDS MAN IN THE LOOP NSF status boxes are being VALIDATION displayed, and similarly the CSP displays show alarm colors only when the CSF status boxes are being displayed.
| |
| l l
| |
| (This evaluation also resolves l
| |
| HED 1072, Category C.) i O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C citeria Report Number 110028 1 C-62 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTlNG DESIGN REWEW n POWER CO.
| |
| U HF AREA computers HED CATEGORY C 5HEET NUMBER OB5ERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1124 The label "INOP" is The SPDS is being revised to add P 6.7.2.4.a displayed twice below "CNTMT 1S01." and "CVI" labels.
| |
| 6.7.2.6 "CNTMT ISOL STATUS" on Thus, when a valve actuated by P, App Q the Noreal Safety Containment Isolation Phase A Q.4.A Punction containment signal becomes inoperable, a CNTMT Q.6.B display, without further ISOL INOP message is displayed.
| |
| labeling. Lack of Sin!.larly, when a valve actuated appropriate labeling by the Containment Ventilation causes confusion and an Isolation signal becomes opportunity for inoperable, a CVI INOP message is '
| |
| e- misinterpretation, displayed.
| |
| REP:
| |
| SPDS EN IN THE lh0P VALIDATION Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C -iteria Report Number 11oo2s.1 C 63 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESlGN REVIEW O GHOUSTON &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C 5HEET NUMBER OB5ERVATION ON REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGaAPH HED 1125 The area under "CNTMT The SPDS is being revised to P 6.7.2.5 ISOL STATUS
| |
| * on the provide clear and concise 6.7.2.6 Normal Safety Function information to the operator P, App. Q Containment display is regarding containment isolation Q.5 blank when Containment valve Bypass /Inop and Tail to.
| |
| Q.6.8 Isolation Phase A and Actuate conditions. Containment Containment Ventilation isolation signals are also being Isolation signals are provided on the display, not present and no containment isolation valves receiving these O- signals are in Bypass /
| |
| Inop condition. This lack of information does not meet the requirertent to provide clear and concise data to the operators.
| |
| REF:
| |
| SPDS MAN IN THE lh0P VALIDATION O Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP (riteric Report Number 11002s.1 C 64 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM Ll3HTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY C
| |
| $HEET NUMSEg OB5ERVATION P ON REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1126 Setpoints highlighted in The criterion has been established P, 6. 7. 2. 5 the Critical Safety that only operator action points 6.7.2.7 Tunction displays by are shown on the CSF displays, and P App. Q arrows and dathed lines that these points are shown using Q.5 versus solid lines do arrows and dashed lines, with Q.7.B not have consistent numerical values corresponding to meaning to the operator, the status trees.
| |
| The SPDS displays have been modified to use arrows and dashed REF: lines for operator action points SPDS MAN IN THE LOOP on Unit 1 and are being so VALIDATION modified on Unit 2. The revision to use numerical values at arrows is being implemented.
| |
| For the discussion of QDPS revisions, see Disposition Note CPT 1.
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG-0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Nun.ber 110028 1 C 63 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTtNG O gSlG N gg yjg W a
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA computers HED CATEGORY C N R OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1127 NIS channel values shown The SPDS display is being revised P, 6.7. 2. 5 on the Normal Safety to include channel numbers and P, App . Q Tunction Suberiticality loop designations.
| |
| Q.5 display are not located according to north /
| |
| south / cast / west plant location around the core. The quadrant labels are not equivalent to RCS loop designations, which O leads to confusion.
| |
| REF:
| |
| SPDS MAN IN THE LOOP VALIDATION Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 C 66 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlOHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Panel 1.ayout HED CATEGORY C SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1043 The arrangement of the An ERFDADS display shows loop P, 6. 8.1.1 T.,,, T., T , and Delta-T comparisons of T.,,, T., T., and P, 6. 5.1.1 meters for the reactor ,
| |
| Delta T. This display facilitates coolant loops on panel quick comparison of the same CP005, while appropriate parameter across the four RCS for other needs, is not loops, adequate for cross loop comparisons of these Based on the above actions, this parameters. HED is considered resolved for Presentation of these Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| parameters on a cross-J~' loop basis is not provided on a computer display either.
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION O Note: Reference P is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C -iteria Report Number 110028-1 C 67 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESlGN REWEW POWER CO, HF AREA Panel Layout HED CATEGORY C N R OBSERVATION E
| |
| ,RE CRITERIA TITLE HED-1142 Valve position light The wiring to the valve posttion P. 6. 8.2. 2.a displays for the MSR 11.ghts has been revised such that P, 6. 5.2.2 main steam purge valves the numerical progression criteria currently show the MSR are met, i.e., valve position 11 valves below the MSR lights for MSR 11 are above the 12 valves, valve position lights for MSR 12.
| |
| Based on the above action, this REF: , HED is considered resolved for OPERATOR OBSERVATION Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P is STP C iteria Report Number 1100281 C 68 STP59 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| nousTou CONTROL ROOM a<inea DESIGN REVIEW
| |
| == co.
| |
| CATEGORY D lied DISPOSITIONS O 1 110024 1 D1 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOnt
| |
| ! UGH G DESIGN REVIEW O
| |
| DHOUSTON &
| |
| HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMaga 085ERVATl0N REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1029 Controls are above 70 These flow controllers are S 138 inches on panel CP022 infrequently used and operated.
| |
| P, 6.1. 2. 5 for the Fuel Handling Location of controls above or P, App. A Building HVAC exhaust below the recommended zone is a A.5 air flow controllers, secondary concern to locating the controls on the appropriate panel.
| |
| A small ladder has been provided to improve accessibility.
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O- Note: Reference P, is NUREG-0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 p.2 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMSER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1088 During three train Additional noise level P, 6.1. 5. 5.b emergency mode control measurements are planned with P, App. D room HVAC operation in three trains of HVAC operating.
| |
| D.1.4 Unit 1, noise levels Based on those measurements, the reach 66 dB(A) at the back6 round noise level will be entrance to the determined and the need for horseshoe area of the corrective action assessed.
| |
| control room. Noise levels at other representative locations were below the 65 dB(A) criterion. (Refer to HED 1063, Category B.)
| |
| (Unit 2 three-train noise levels have not been determined.)
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number l P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11oo2s 1 D-3 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LGHTING O gg$Q N R g ylE W POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREAk 'orkspace HED CATEGORY D N 8" on DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1146 Some safety related Due to the infrequent use of the P 6.1. 2. 5. a controls on the ASP, no revisions are required.
| |
| P App. A Auxiliary Shutdown ,
| |
| The operators can comfortably A.S.B Panel, or those which perform actions needed at the ASP, must be used during even though the placement of the emergency operations, controls does not meet the are located above 53 criteria, inches.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS Note: Reference P is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 1100281 D4 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| r 1
| |
| 1 l
| |
| 1 1
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM ;
| |
| UGHT'NG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY D
| |
| $HEET NUMBEn OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1147 Some safety related Due to the infrequent use of the P. 6.1. 2. 5.b displays on the ASP, no revisions are required.
| |
| P App. A Auxiliary Shutdown The operators can comfortably A.S.D Panel, or those which perform actions needed at the ASP, must be used during even though the placement of the emergency operations, displays does not meet the are located above 65 criteria, inches or below 50 inches. Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| 1 REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS l
| |
| l I
| |
| 1 1
| |
| O Note: Reference P is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 11oo2s1 D.5 ,
| |
| STP60 12/01/89 1
| |
| | |
| t i
| |
| HOVSTON CONTROL ROOM ;
| |
| Ll3HTING DESIGN REVIEW a
| |
| POWER CO, HF AREA Workspac* HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH t HED 1148 Access to the documents Locks will be removed from the P, 6.1.1.4 required for Auxiliary door at the back of the ASP Room P 6.1.1.4 Shutdown Panel and the cabinets, providing easy operations requires two access to the documents. Access to keys: one to open the the ASP Room itself continues to door at the back of the require a key.
| |
| ASP Room; one to open the cabinet containing Labeling will be provided to the documents, identify the location of the documents and the contents of each Location of the cabinet drawer, t
| |
| i tO documents is not indicated in the ASP Storage options will be Room, and some cabinet investigated and appropriate drawers are not labeled storage provided, for contents.
| |
| The quantity of documents per cabinet drawer makes the drawers difficult to open and caused the cabinet to tip.
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 p.6 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM i LtGHTING a
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW i POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Vorkspace HED CATEGORY D
| |
| ]
| |
| I
| |
| $HEET NUMBEa OR$ERVATION OR D15P051T10N REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH l HED 1149 The Auxiliary Shutdown A supply of light bulbs (the only P 6.1.1.5 Panel Room does not expendables required) will be l P, . 6 .1.1. 5 contain the expendables provided at the ASP. l needed for the ASP. l l
| |
| REF: I CATECORY E EVALUATIONS O
| |
| I I
| |
| l l
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number stoo2s 1 D7 STP60 12/01/89 4
| |
| | |
| Houston CONTROL ROOM LOH G DESIGN REVIEW O k=a w. ,
| |
| HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUNIBEa OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1151 A draft of 160 ft/ min This HED remains under evaluation P, 6.1. 5. 2.b exists at the CRT to determine final resolution.
| |
| P, App. D workstation in the Rebalancing the EAB HVAC system D.1.1.C Unit 1 Auxiliary may resolve this problem.
| |
| Shutdown Panel Room, exceeding the 45 ft/ min (Air velocity measurements in the criterion limit. Unit 2 Auxiliary Shutdown Panel Room have shown no measurable airflow.)
| |
| O CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number 4
| |
| P, is STP C riteria Report Number 1100281 D8 STP60 12f01jg9
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW a
| |
| '(-
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| l HF AREAW orkspace HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBEg OB5ERVATION REFEkiNCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAS *f_PH HED 1152 Direct overhead lighting This HED will be evaluated with
| |
| ! P,- 6.1. 5. 3. e in the Auxiliary HED 1153 (Category D), concerning l
| |
| l P, App . D Shutdown Panel Room meter glare.
| |
| D.1.2.E results in operator fatigue.
| |
| 1 REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS O
| |
| l 1
| |
| I l \
| |
| l l
| |
| l Note: Reference P, is NUREG-0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Cr iteria Report Number 110026 1 p,9 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| I CONTROL ROOM .
| |
| Ll3HTING p gggg y g g yjg g DHOusTON &
| |
| POWER CO. 1 i
| |
| HF AREA Workspace HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBEg OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1153 Direct overhead lightit.g Alternatives for reducing glare P 6.1. 5. 3. f produces glare on the will be considered. This HED P App. D Auxiliary Shutdown Panel ,
| |
| remains under evaluation to D.l.2.G meters. determine final resolution. !
| |
| REF: i l
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS j
| |
| !O l l
| |
| l i
| |
| l l i l
| |
| l l
| |
| l O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C:-iteria Report Number stoo2s 1 D 10 l STP60 12/01/89 l
| |
| | |
| .~ . .
| |
| i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM L*H G DESIGN REVIEW j a
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| (~
| |
| HF AREA Workspace D !
| |
| HED CATEGORY i
| |
| $NEET NUMSEg 08 SERVAT 10N OR D15P051T10N REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH i HED 1157 Background noise level This discrepancy remains under P,.6.1.5.5.b at the Auxiliary evaluation to determine final j P,. App. D Shutdown Panel exceeds disposition. l D.1.4.D the criteria limit of 65 dB(A). resulting in j degraded operator l performance due to auditory fatigue.
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS l
| |
| l 1
| |
| I O Note: Reference P, is NUREG-0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C,riteria Report Number 1100281 D 11 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOVSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW a
| |
| POWER CO, hF AREA Communications HED CATEGORY , D N 8I" Ol$ POSITION On
| |
| ,RE E, CRITERIA TITLE HED 1085 The patch panels for the Addition of labels to provide S 0255 maintenance interconnection information at P, 6. 6.1.1 communication system do each patch panel will be evaluated P, 7 . 3 not have readily as part of the plant modification 6.4.1.2 available information process, for tieing in several people at various locations.
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number i P is STP C1iteria Report Number 110028 1 D 12 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| s l
| |
| I HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW ;
| |
| O V
| |
| POWER CO, HF AREA Communications HED CATEGORY D SHEET l NUMBEg OBSERVATION
| |
| ]
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE I PARAGaAPH l l
| |
| HED 1155 The location of the Reevaluation of the communications P. 6. 2.1. 3 communications box in box location, to improve j P, 7. 3 the Unit 1 Auxiliary usability, will be performed as Shutdown Panel Room part of the plant modification results in congestion, process.
| |
| 1 The communications box in the I Unit 2 ASP Room has been evaluated and is located appropriately.
| |
| REF:
| |
| f CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS l
| |
| . 1 I
| |
| l 1
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110024 1 p,y3 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| *- w
| |
| | |
| i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM I'*HT'"G DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| {J')
| |
| u HF AREA Annunciator HED CATEGORY D 5HEET '
| |
| NUMRER OBSERVATION l DISPO5til0N OR REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1092 Temporary identification A
| |
| * blue dot", indicating that the P, 6. 3. 3. 3. e (colored dots) has been computer system is driving that 6.6.5.1 added to the annunciator window, will b- engraved on each ,
| |
| P, None windows actuated via computer driven annunciator ERFDADS to distinguish window.
| |
| these alarms in the event of ERFDADS failure or malfunction.
| |
| REF: !
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION i
| |
| l l
| |
| l l
| |
| l \
| |
| l O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 D 14 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
| |
| .' LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| O HF AREA Controls HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBEg OB5ERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1001 After ' quick release" of Training has been implemented to P, 6.4.1. 2 certain Microswitch ensure that operators do not P, 6. 2.1. 6 switches, the switch may " quick release" the switches.
| |
| go past the center Without the
| |
| * quick release", the position and make up switch does not go past the center contacts for the position and cause the reverse opposite position of the actuation. No further corrective switch. The switches action is required.
| |
| involved are three-position switches, Based on the above actions, this maintained in the right HED is considered resolved for or left position and Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| spring return to center from the other position.
| |
| This accidental actuation may occur when the switch is turned to the spring return position and then released quickly.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 D 15 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i i
| |
| CONTROL ROOM UGHTNG pgglQ N p g yjg g D HOUSTON a POWER CO.
| |
| ]
| |
| HF AREA Controls HED CATEGORY D ;
| |
| SHEET i WUMBER OSSERVATION OR Dl5P05tT10N i REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE I PARAGRAPH I l
| |
| HED.1090 color coding of Switch handles on panel CP010 have P,. 6. 4. 2. 2 J handles on panel CP010 been replaced with black handles, 3 P . 6. 2.1.10 switches providing feeds , conforming to the color coding ]
| |
| App. S to ESF bus transformers criteria for switches. I S.4.3 does not conform to the color coding criteria. Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
| |
| l l
| |
| l 1
| |
| I l
| |
| l l l I
| |
| l l'
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREU.0700 Section 6 Number l P, is STP Criteria Report Number '
| |
| 11002s 1 D-16 .
| |
| i-STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| l HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM 1 UGH G DESIGN REWEW a l 4 POWER CO.
| |
| 1' HF AREA controls HED CATEGORY D N R OBSERVADON g Dl5PO$1710N REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGPAPH j l
| |
| HED 1093 Pushbuttons for manual Reengraving of the pushbuttons to 4 P, 6.4. 3. 3 initiation of the add closed corners, distinguishing P App. E Bypass / Inoperable Status them from indicating lights, will .
| |
| 1 E.1.$.1 Monitoring System do not be evaluated as part of the plant meet the " closed corner modification process, octagon" criterion for j distinguishing legend I pushbuttons from indicating lights, l l
| |
| i REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l I
| |
| 1 \
| |
| l I
| |
| l l-l O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number l 11002s 1 p,17 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| l QQ s
| |
| CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REWEW l
| |
| (, POWER CO.
| |
| % )1 HF AREA controls HED CATEGORY D ,
| |
| I 1
| |
| 5HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION l OR DISP 0$m0N )
| |
| urfuNcE ERIA ME PARAGRAPH HED 1144 Slow opening valves with Alternatives for holding the P 6.4.1.1. a small finger ope?.e.ed control switch ' actuated" will be P, 6. 2.1.1 controls are difficult evaluated to determine the to hold '' actuated" for appropriate resolution.
| |
| the time required for full valve stroke. Valves provided with jog control Additionally, some will be reevaluated to determine valves are provided with whether they actually need jog jog control, with no control. Where not required, the obvious need for this logic will be revised to a seal in type of circuit, circuit.
| |
| l REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION 1
| |
| 1 O
| |
| l V l
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number I P, is STP C riteria Report Number t t002s 1 p.18 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING 95$jg y g g ygg y a
| |
| l POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBEn OR$ERVATION OR Dl5PO$1 TION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1028 The third pen on three. Three pen recorders have been P, 6. 5.4.1 pen recorders is replaced with recorders made by l P, App. I obscured by the scales, another manufacturer. These new I.4 F recorders clearly show all three pens.
| |
| l l REF: Based on the above actions, this EOP VALIDATION REPORT HED is considered resolved for l
| |
| I APPENDIX A Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| O l
| |
| l l
| |
| l l
| |
| l l
| |
| l l
| |
| l O Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C -iteria Report Number l 11e0281 D 19 l
| |
| STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| I HOVSTON CONTROL ROOM \
| |
| UGHTlNG DESIGN REVIEW ;
| |
| I POWER CO. '
| |
| O,rN HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY D i
| |
| 5HEET NUMBER OBSERVATION
| |
| , g REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH ,
| |
| HED.1076 The alternate boric acid Investigation of this flow P. 6. 5.1. 2 flow indicator has the instrument loop scaling 6.5.1.3 first division at 30 GPM requirements, to determine an l P,. App. F (log scale). This is acceptable range that will provide F.1 the minimum required readability for the minimum Tech ;
| |
| F.2 flow per Tech Specs and Spec flow, will be performed as very hard to determine. part of the plant modification process.
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION l
| |
| l l
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C -iteria Report Number 11oo2s 1 D 20 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| i HousioN CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESlGN REWEW l s 1
| |
| ('')
| |
| (/
| |
| POWER CO. l l
| |
| HF AREA Visual Displays HED CATEGORY D l l
| |
| 5HEET I NUMBEg Ot$fRVATION OR Di$ POSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE l PARAGRAPH l
| |
| 1 HED 1104 RCS pressure recorder The technical and licensing P, . 6. 5 .1. 5 PR 0406 has a range of reasons for the different scales P,. App . T 0 3000 psig, on a scale override the desirability to meet l F.5 of 0 to 30 (psig x 100) the human factors criteria. No j with major division corrective action is required. l increments of 10. RCS pressure recorder PR. Based on the above, this HED is ;
| |
| 0407 has a range of 0 considered resolved for Unit 1 and l 3500 psig, on a scale of Unit 2.
| |
| 0 to 35 (psig x 100) with major division O increments of 5. Since the recorders are adjacent to eneh other, the readings will be compared; the scales '
| |
| should be compatible in numerical progression and scale organization. l l
| |
| l REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l Note: Referenc e P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number l D: is STP Criteria Report Number l
| |
| l 11oo2s 1 D.21 l.
| |
| STP60 12/01/89 l
| |
| | |
| i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM UGHTSNG DESIGN REVIEW c POWER CO.
| |
| f V) HT AREA Visual Displays D HED CATEGORY ,
| |
| 5HEET !
| |
| NUMRER Ot$ERVATION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH J
| |
| HED 1154 Meter scale dimension The smaller scales in question are j P, 6. 5.1. 5.b criteria are not met on part of controllers; the scales I P, App. F smaller scales on the have been evaluated as adequately F.4.D Auxiliary Shutdown providing parameter indication.
| |
| Panel. The criteria document will be j revised to indicate that the smaller scales are appropriate in j this application.
| |
| REF-CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS O\ Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C~iteria Report Number 110028 1 D 22 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| --. ~
| |
| e
| |
| !'i i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING ggglQ g gg yjg g A
| |
| b ~-(] Q, POWER CO.
| |
| l HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBER - OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH i
| |
| HED 1091 Color coding of SI Uce of mimic colors to ,
| |
| P 6.6.6.4 process simic on panel differentiate ESF subsystems by 6.5.1.6 CP001 does not conform train has been evaluated as P App. N to mimic color coding effective as an aid to operators l
| |
| N.1.2 criteria. in differentiating train App. S associated equipment on panel '
| |
| S.4.G CP001. Criteria are being developed for the use of train.
| |
| REF: reisted color coding of mimics.
| |
| l ENGINEERING OBSERVATION The mimics in the control room p will be modified in accordance with the revised criteria.
| |
| l (See also HED 1105, Category C.)
| |
| l I
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 11oo2s 1 D-23 STP60- 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING . DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Labels and Location Aids HED CATEGORY D L
| |
| l' . SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION lc L REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAtl}APH ,
| |
| j HED 1100 The ESF Status Provision of a demarcation pad for P,- 6 . 6 . 6 .1 Monitoring test the CP004 pushbutton and labels 6.6.6.2 pushbutton on CP004 for all ESF Status Monitoring test ;
| |
| I 6.6.1.1 lacks.a demarcation pad pushbuttons will be evaluated as P,- App. N (darker color paint), part of the plant modification l
| |
| N.1.1 The test pushbuttons on process. l 6.4.1.2 CP022 have labels indicating which is used for Bypass /Inop window test and which is used
| |
| - for Fail to Actuate l 1
| |
| window test. Such l 1
| |
| labels are not provided on other main control l panels.
| |
| 1 REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
| |
| l l
| |
| i l
| |
| l l
| |
| l O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number
| |
| . P, is STP Criteria Report Number i
| |
| 11002s 1 D 24 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW.
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA visual Displays HED CATEGORY D N BR OBSERVATION DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1137 The main generator MVAR The main generator MVAR meter P.- 6. 5.1.1 meter uses "IN/OUT" label has been revised to use g 6.5.1.2.b labeling, while system " LEAD / LAG" terminology.
| |
| 6.6.3.2 dispatcher.uses P, 6. 3.1. 2 terminology of Based upon the above actions, this App. F " LEAD / LAG" . HED is considered resolved for F.1 Unit 1 and Unit 2. -
| |
| F.3.4 6.4.1.2 6.4.5 REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11oo2s 1 D-25 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN ' REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY D N 8R OBSERVATION DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1034 The titles for the The ERFDADS displays have been S 0825 Normal and Critical revised to put the NSF/CSF letter P, 6. 7. 2.4 Safety Function displays designator in brackets after the P,- App. Q on ERFDADS would be safety function.
| |
| Q.4.P enhanced if the NSF/CSF letter designator were Based on the above actions, this placed in brackets, HED is considered resolved for e.g.: Unit 1. These same changes are being implemented for Unit 2.
| |
| Present - HEAT SINK H Better - HEAT SINK [H]
| |
| REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS O Note: Reference P, is NUREG-0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 110028 1 D-26 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LlGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| - O. .
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY D NU R OBSERVATION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1035 The ERFDADS keyboard is The possibility of differentiating P, 6. 7.14 lettered in three lines, the " shift" function line from the P App. P It is difficult to find "unshifted" function line will be P.1 -the correct key since investigated. (The top line is the same letter may the " shift" function.) The keys appear on two of the may not be large enough to lines. (The " shift" implement this recommendation.
| |
| function should be differentiated from the "unshifted" function.)
| |
| O REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS 9 Note: Reference P, is NUREG.0700 Section 6 Number P2 is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s-1 D-27 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM' LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY D N R OBSERVATION REFERENCE . CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1039 Proteus displays are The STP criterion has been S 0853 inconsistent in the use established as follows: Periods P, . 6. 7. 2. 4. k of periods at the end of ,
| |
| are to be used only at the end of P, App. Q a sentence or listing. a sentence. The computer displays Q.4.K (Procedure writer's will be reviewed for conformance guides sometimes to this criterion end revised as encourage not using required.
| |
| complete sentences and avoiding the use of periods.)
| |
| O REF:
| |
| CATEGORY E EVALUATIONS O Note: Reference P, is NUREG.0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11002s 1 D 28 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| CONTROL ROOM UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW DHOUSTON &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY D NU R OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1069 Color codings on SPDS Refer to HED 1123, Category D.
| |
| P, 6. 7. 2.7 displays have different P, App. Q meanings in different Based upon the opening of HED-Q.7.K places (trend graphs). 1123, this HED is considered closed for Unit 1 and Unit 2.
| |
| REF:
| |
| SPDS AUDIT O
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 D-29 STP60. 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON ' CONTROL' ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY D N ER OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1071 The ERFDADS function Labeling provided on the SPDS keys P - 6. 7.1. 4 keys used for SPDS is seen as adequate. Evaluations P, App. P should be differentiated will be performed to determine P.1 from the remaining keys, possible means to highlight these keys as SPDS keys.
| |
| REF:
| |
| SPDS AUDIT O Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number :
| |
| P is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 D 30 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM '
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW
| |
| - [G]
| |
| D UGHTING &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE- CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED-1073 Displays for QDPS and The displays will be revised to P 6.7.2.7 ERFDADS have been show the symbol for a cooler or P,- App. Q developed using the P&ID heater, without letters Q.7.H symbol for a cooler or- identifying the service or water App L heater, but without source, in conformance to the consistency in use of criteria developed.
| |
| letters identifying the service or water source.
| |
| Ov REF:
| |
| L ENGINEERING OBSERVATION O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 11oo2s 1 D-31 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| e HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM L'0H G DESIGN REVIEW G POWER CO.
| |
| , -L)
| |
| HF AREA computers HED CATEGORY D L-. SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION l OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH 1
| |
| HED-1074 The displayed value The ERFDADS display will be l- P, 6. 7. 2.4 sequence for RCS revised to conform with the QDPS P, App. Q pressure in ERFDADS is display, which is designed to Q.4.E different from QDPS. group the two sensors with the same range together.
| |
| REF:
| |
| 1 ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
| |
| .p l
| |
| \
| |
| v l
| |
| l L 1 l
| |
| l 1-l l
| |
| L O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C citeria Report Number 1100281 D-32 L
| |
| l' STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING ~ DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY D N R OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TlTLE PARAGRAPH HED 1106 Various changes are The ERFDADS display CV 02 has been P 6.7.2.5 required on the ERFDADS revised to more closely reflect P3 App. Q display CV-02 to match the actual plant.
| |
| Q.5.A the actual plant.
| |
| Based on the above actions, this HED is considered resolved for Unit 1. These same changes are REF: being implemented for Unit 2.
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION O
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG-0700 Section 6 Number l P is STP Cciteria Report Number 3
| |
| 110028 1 D-33 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| : HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHT lNG a
| |
| DESIGN REVIEW ,
| |
| i POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBEg OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION ;
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE (
| |
| PARAGRAPH HED-1110 The cursors on the SPDS This discrepancy remains under j
| |
| . P -6. 7. 2. 5.n Critical' Safety Function evaluation to determine final P, App Q Integrity:"0PERATING" , disposition.
| |
| Q.5.N and " COLD OVERPRESSURE" trend displays are
| |
| -difficult to locate on the CRT. The size of each cursor is one pixel and is meant to show the current value in a trend
| |
| -v(] plot.
| |
| REF:
| |
| SPDS MAIN-IN-THE-LOOP 2
| |
| VALIDATION A
| |
| U Note: Reference P, is NUREG-0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 p.34 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM gggggy ggyjgy i,
| |
| D LlOHTlNG &
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA computers HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBER ORSERVATION OR- DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1113 On the SPDS NSF- The SPDS Normal Safety Function P,- 6. 7. 2. 5 Containment display the Containment display will be P App Q scale legend associated revised to move the ' pressure" bar ,
| |
| Q.5.C with containment to the left hand side of the trend temperature and pressure chart, values can result in operator confusion and potential misreading of the values.
| |
| REF:
| |
| l SPDS MAN IN THE LOOP VALIDATION 1
| |
| 1 1
| |
| t l
| |
| O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C iteria Report Number 110028 1 D 35 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ^ ROOM LIGHTING g gglQ y g g yjg y POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1114 The lack of digital Digital values of parameters will P,- 6. 7. 2. 4 information makes be provided on the SPDS Normal ;
| |
| P, 11.1 accurate determination Safety Function displays, l App. Q of the SPDS Normal Q,4.A Safety Function bar chart values difficult and time consuming.
| |
| l REF:
| |
| SPDS MAN IN THE LOOP VALIDATION O Note: ' Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C riteria Report Number 11002s 1 D-36 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING ggggg y g g yjg y iQ V
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| - HF AREA computers HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1122 The acronym for breaker The SPDS top level displays have P, 6. 7. 2.4 (BRK) appearing on the been revised to change "BRK" to 6.6.3.3 top level SPDS displays "BKR".
| |
| P App. Q 3 is inconsistent'with the Q.4 acronym for breaker Based on the above actions, this 6.4.6 (BKR) contained in the HED is considered resolved for App. L "STP Standard Acronyms Unit 2. These same changes are List". being implemented for Unit 1.
| |
| [
| |
| REF:
| |
| SPDS MAN IN THE-LOOP VALIDATION O Note: Reference P, is NUREG 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C :iteria Report Number 110028 1. D 37 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| l ,
| |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW a
| |
| ',r < _
| |
| POWER CO.
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBEg OBSERVATION p
| |
| REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH
| |
| -HED 1123 The SPDS uses some of Use of colors other than green, P,- 6. 7. 2. 7 .the same colors for yellow and red will be P, App . Q trends and bar chart investigated for use on trend i 1
| |
| Q.7.K alarms on the Normal graphs. l 1
| |
| Safety Function displays. Specifically, (See also HED 1069, Category D.)
| |
| green and yellow are used for both purposes.
| |
| REF: 1 1
| |
| SPDS MAN IN-THE-LOOP '
| |
| VALIDATION l l
| |
| Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Criteria Report Number 110028 1 D-38 l STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON. CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING _ ggSlgy ggyjgy
| |
| - S O POWER CO.-
| |
| %.)
| |
| HF AREA Computers HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBER 045ERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERI A TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1136 ERFDADS display MS 06 Class 1E radiation monitor values i P. 6. 7. 2.4 gives the main steam are_datalinked to ERFDADS from 6.6.3.3 line radiation value both QDPS and directly from the P, App Q units as "R/HR" and uses radiation monitoring system. ,
| |
| Q.4 the values datalinked Criteria are being developed to 6.4.6 from QDPS, which are govern what input values will be App, L actually in uC1/cc used on each display. Following instead, development of the. criteria, the displays will be revised to l ERFDADS display RA-10 conform to the criteria, and the uses the RMS datalinked proper units will be shown.
| |
| values for SG blowdown, l
| |
| which have units of l l
| |
| mR/HR, but the display j shows units of uCi/cc.
| |
| REF:
| |
| ENGINEERING OBSERVATION l
| |
| 1 O
| |
| b Note: Reference P, is NUREG-0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP Cciteria Report Number 110028 1 D-39 STP60 12/01/89
| |
| | |
| HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
| |
| , POWER CO.
| |
| \
| |
| HF AREA Panel Layout HED CATEGORY D SHEET NUMBER OBSERVATION OR DISPOSITION REFERENCE CRITERIA TITLE PARAGRAPH HED 1107 Pushbuttons for blocking The power range neutron flux low P, 6. 8. 2. 2 the power range neutron setpoint trip block pushbuttons, 6.8.2.3 flux low setpoint trip and their associated labels, will P, 6. 5. 2. 2 above P 10 are laid out be reversed so that the "R" switch 6.5.2.3 vertically on panel is above the "S" switch.
| |
| CP005. The "S" train pushbutton is above the "R" train pushbutton.
| |
| This arrangement is inconsistent with the source range block
| |
| ! switches and the i intermediate range block l pushbuttons (also on !
| |
| CP005) and the normal top-to bottom alphabetic layout arrangement.
| |
| REF:
| |
| OPERATOR OBSERVATION
| |
| ; 's / Note: Reference P, is NUREC 0700 Section 6 Number P, is STP C citeria Report Number 11oo2s 1 D 40 STP60 12/01/89}}
| |
