ML20041C132: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:. | ||
N Commonweehh Edloon | |||
/ ' | |||
) one First National Plazl, Chicago. Ilhnoit i | |||
kO 7 Address Reply to: Post Offica Box 767 Nj Chicago, Illinois 60690 Feb rua ry 22, 1982 N ' | |||
S REcg;yg Licensing Branch #2 257gu k Mr. A. Schwencer, Chief 8 | |||
Division of Licensing k g*h, e ums U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission t | |||
Washington, DC 20555 | |||
'b | |||
==Subject:== | |||
LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 | |||
~ | |||
Proposed Technical Specification Changes NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374 | |||
==Dear Mr. Schwencer:== | |||
The purpose of this letter is to propose a clarification change to.the LaSalle County Station Technical Specifications. | |||
_The proposed change which was discussed with Mr. R._Bottimore on February 19, 1982, will clarify the required actions when performing a channel functional test on the ADS Timers and LPCI Pump " A" Start | |||
' Time Delay Relays. | |||
In Table 4.3.3.1-1 o f the Technical Specification (enclosure) Items A.l.F, A.2.C and B.2.C, are shown with a footnote (a). | |||
There appears to be no reason for this footnote since the functional check of the actuation instrumentation is required on a monthly basis. | |||
The footnote only serves to confuse the intent of the specification and, in fact, is inconsistant since item B.l.d does not have the same footnote. | |||
Therefore, a proposed change to the Technical Specification is requested to delete footnote (a). | |||
If there are any further questions in this regard, please contact this office. | |||
Very truly yours, 0.^^ | |||
b C. E. Sargent Nuclear Licensing Administrator 1m Enclosure g | |||
cc: | |||
NRC Resident III Inspector - LSCS 61 l | |||
3489N 8202260241 820222 PDR ADOCK 05000373 A | |||
PDR | |||
__}} | |||
Latest revision as of 20:04, 19 December 2024
| ML20041C132 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 02/22/1982 |
| From: | Sargent C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041C133 | List: |
| References | |
| 3489N, NUDOCS 8202260241 | |
| Download: ML20041C132 (1) | |
Text
.
N Commonweehh Edloon
/ '
) one First National Plazl, Chicago. Ilhnoit i
kO 7 Address Reply to: Post Offica Box 767 Nj Chicago, Illinois 60690 Feb rua ry 22, 1982 N '
S REcg;yg Licensing Branch #2 257gu k Mr. A. Schwencer, Chief 8
Division of Licensing k g*h, e ums U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission t
Washington, DC 20555
'b
Subject:
LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2
~
Proposed Technical Specification Changes NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374
Dear Mr. Schwencer:
The purpose of this letter is to propose a clarification change to.the LaSalle County Station Technical Specifications.
_The proposed change which was discussed with Mr. R._Bottimore on February 19, 1982, will clarify the required actions when performing a channel functional test on the ADS Timers and LPCI Pump " A" Start
' Time Delay Relays.
In Table 4.3.3.1-1 o f the Technical Specification (enclosure) Items A.l.F, A.2.C and B.2.C, are shown with a footnote (a).
There appears to be no reason for this footnote since the functional check of the actuation instrumentation is required on a monthly basis.
The footnote only serves to confuse the intent of the specification and, in fact, is inconsistant since item B.l.d does not have the same footnote.
Therefore, a proposed change to the Technical Specification is requested to delete footnote (a).
If there are any further questions in this regard, please contact this office.
Very truly yours, 0.^^
b C. E. Sargent Nuclear Licensing Administrator 1m Enclosure g
cc:
NRC Resident III Inspector - LSCS 61 l
3489N 8202260241 820222 PDR ADOCK 05000373 A
__