ML20090F513: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. 9 O | {{#Wiki_filter:. 9 O | ||
Dmcu POWER Goxiwxy P.O. HOx 33180 CHAMLOTTE, N.C. 28242 IIAL H. TUCKEH | Dmcu POWER Goxiwxy P.O. HOx 33180 CHAMLOTTE, N.C. 28242 IIAL H. TUCKEH Ten.epuose | ||
.Z.","~1. | |||
July 17, 1984 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. | |||
20555 Attention: Ms. E. G. Adensam, Chief Licensing Branch No. 4 Re: Catawba Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 | |||
==Dear Mr. Denton:== | ==Dear Mr. Denton:== | ||
In response to Mr. T. M. Novak's letter of May 25, 1984 which transmitted the | In response to Mr. T. M. Novak's letter of May 25, 1984 which transmitted the | ||
" Draft"-Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specifications, Duke certified in my {{letter dated|date=July 3, 1984|text=July 3, 1984 letter}} that the specifications as revised by your letters of June 8 and 22, 1984 accurately reflected the as-built plant. A subsequent letter dated July 17,.1984 transmitted a number of revised specifications. | |||
Based on the extensive preparation and review effort that has gone into the development of the Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specifications, Duke Power Company certifies that, to the best of our knowledge, the " Draft" Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specificatio'ns, as revised by the three referenced letters, accurately reflect the as-built plant and the Catawba FSAR. Furthermore, we are not aware of any conflicts between the " Draft" Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specifications and the NRC staff's SER analyses. | Based on the extensive preparation and review effort that has gone into the development of the Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specifications, Duke Power Company certifies that, to the best of our knowledge, the " Draft" Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specificatio'ns, as revised by the three referenced letters, accurately reflect the as-built plant and the Catawba FSAR. Furthermore, we are not aware of any conflicts between the " Draft" Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specifications and the NRC staff's SER analyses. | ||
Very truly yours, H. B. Tucker RWO/rbs Attachment cc: Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station | Very truly yours, H. B. Tucker RWO/rbs Attachment cc: Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station 8 | ||
f e 0 8407230133 840717 PDR ADOCK 05000 | |||
Mr. Harold R. D:nton, Director | Mr. Harold R. D:nton, Director July 17, 1984 Pagn 2 Mr. Robert Guild, Esq. | ||
Pagn 2 | |||
Mr. Robert Guild, Esq. | |||
Attorney-at-Law P. O. Box 12097 Charleston, South Carolina 29412 Palmetto Alliance 2135} Devine Street Columbia, South Carolina 29205 | Attorney-at-Law P. O. Box 12097 Charleston, South Carolina 29412 Palmetto Alliance 2135} Devine Street Columbia, South Carolina 29205 | ||
. Mr. Jesse L. Riley Carolina Environmental Study Group 854 Henley Place Charlotte, North Carolina 28207 4 | |||
] | |||
H i | H i | ||
i-4 a | i-4 a | ||
f | f | ||
'Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director July 17,1984 Pags 2 l | |||
1 I | 1 I | ||
HAL B. TUCKER, being duly sworn, states that he is Vice President of Duke Power Company; that he is authorized on the part of said Company to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission this Certification of the Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specifications, and that all statements and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge. | HAL B. TUCKER, being duly sworn, states that he is Vice President of Duke Power Company; that he is authorized on the part of said Company to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission this Certification of the Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specifications, and that all statements and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge. | ||
k Hal B. Tucker, Vice President Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of July, 1984. | k Hal B. Tucker, Vice President Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of July, 1984. | ||
L 6 db | L 6 db 1/ | ||
My Conmission Expires: | Notary Public My Conmission Expires: | ||
Gt,,A M | Gt,,A M 2o | ||
#tV | |||
/ | |||
l | l | ||
.,n m. | |||
y- | y- | ||
,m: | |||
r | |||
.,-v.-}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:17, 13 December 2024
| ML20090F513 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 07/17/1984 |
| From: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | Adensam E, Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8407230133 | |
| Download: ML20090F513 (3) | |
Text
. 9 O
Dmcu POWER Goxiwxy P.O. HOx 33180 CHAMLOTTE, N.C. 28242 IIAL H. TUCKEH Ten.epuose
.Z.","~1.
July 17, 1984 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 Attention: Ms. E. G. Adensam, Chief Licensing Branch No. 4 Re: Catawba Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414
Dear Mr. Denton:
In response to Mr. T. M. Novak's letter of May 25, 1984 which transmitted the
" Draft"-Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specifications, Duke certified in my July 3, 1984 letter that the specifications as revised by your letters of June 8 and 22, 1984 accurately reflected the as-built plant. A subsequent letter dated July 17,.1984 transmitted a number of revised specifications.
Based on the extensive preparation and review effort that has gone into the development of the Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specifications, Duke Power Company certifies that, to the best of our knowledge, the " Draft" Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specificatio'ns, as revised by the three referenced letters, accurately reflect the as-built plant and the Catawba FSAR. Furthermore, we are not aware of any conflicts between the " Draft" Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specifications and the NRC staff's SER analyses.
Very truly yours, H. B. Tucker RWO/rbs Attachment cc: Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station 8
f e 0 8407230133 840717 PDR ADOCK 05000
Mr. Harold R. D:nton, Director July 17, 1984 Pagn 2 Mr. Robert Guild, Esq.
Attorney-at-Law P. O. Box 12097 Charleston, South Carolina 29412 Palmetto Alliance 2135} Devine Street Columbia, South Carolina 29205
. Mr. Jesse L. Riley Carolina Environmental Study Group 854 Henley Place Charlotte, North Carolina 28207 4
]
H i
i-4 a
f
'Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director July 17,1984 Pags 2 l
1 I
HAL B. TUCKER, being duly sworn, states that he is Vice President of Duke Power Company; that he is authorized on the part of said Company to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission this Certification of the Catawba Unit 1 Technical Specifications, and that all statements and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge.
k Hal B. Tucker, Vice President Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of July, 1984.
L 6 db 1/
Notary Public My Conmission Expires:
Gt,,A M 2o
- tV
/
l
.,n m.
y-
,m:
r
.,-v.-