ML20137B105: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I
{{#Wiki_filter:'
  .'          . .                                                                                                              l
l
[f
[f
                +                     o,                             UNITED STATES yg .sy#             g                 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
+
o, UNITED STATES
, Q )(. (,
yg.sy#
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
{
            , Q )(.[( ,                E
E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
                                                      ~
[
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 September 16, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR: Karl V. Seyfrit, Chief                                            AEOD/E513 Reactor Operations Analysis Branch
September 16, 1985
~
~
Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data                                                 __
MEMORANDUM FOR: Karl V. Seyfrit, Chief AEOD/E513 Reactor Operations Analysis Branch Office for Analysis and Evaluation
THRU:                     Stuart D. Rubin, Chief i                                           /       Reactor Systems Section 1
~
.                                                    Reactor Operations Analysis ranch t
of Operational Data THRU:
Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data FROM:                     Sagid Salah, Engineer Reactor Systems Section 1 Reactor Operations Analysis Branch Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data
Stuart D. Rubin, Chief i
/
Reactor Systems Section 1 Reactor Operations Analysis ranch t
Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data FROM:
Sagid Salah, Engineer Reactor Systems Section 1 Reactor Operations Analysis Branch Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY SYSTEM RELIEF VALVE FAILURES Forwarded herewith is the subject Engineering Evaluation report for your i            -)          i nformation. The results of this review indicated that excessive hydraulic forces (back pressure) from the discharge side of the HPCS discharge relief valve caused the relief valve's internal bellows seal assembly to fail at LaSalle 1 and 2. To correct these problems, the licensee has modified the HPGS relief valve discharge path. It is expected that this modification will eliminate the potential for HPCS relief valve bellows seal assembly failures. From a review of the other BWRs with a HPCS system, it is concluded that River Bend Unit 1 is the only other BWR potentially suscep-                   ..
HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY SYSTEM RELIEF VALVE FAILURES i
tible to the kind of relief valve failures which occurred at LaSalia. Both plants utilize similar relief valve discharge piping arrangements and Crosby relief valves with an internal bellows seal. The other BWRs have sufficiently different HPCS system relief valve designs and/or discharge arrangements to rule out the potential for such valve failures at these 4
-)
pl ants. River Bend Unit 1 is currently loading fuel into the core in                               .
Forwarded herewith is the subject Engineering Evaluation report for your i nformation. The results of this review indicated that excessive hydraulic forces (back pressure) from the discharge side of the HPCS discharge relief valve caused the relief valve's internal bellows seal assembly to fail at LaSalle 1 and 2.
preparation for low power testing. It is suggested, therefore, that AEOD alert Region IV of the potential for HPCS relief valve failures at River                   '
To correct these problems, the licensee has modified the HPGS relief valve discharge path.
Bend similar to those which occurred at LaSalle.
It is expected that this modification will eliminate the potential for HPCS relief valve bellows seal assembly failures. From a review of the other BWRs with a HPCS system, it is concluded that River Bend Unit 1 is the only other BWR potentially suscep-tible to the kind of relief valve failures which occurred at LaSalia. Both plants utilize similar relief valve discharge piping arrangements and Crosby relief valves with an internal bellows seal.
                                                                            .  -y         j   f.
The other BWRs have sufficiently different HPCS system relief valve designs and/or discharge arrangements to rule out the potential for such valve failures at these pl ants.
                                                                                        'v  M       N'\
River Bend Unit 1 is currently loading fuel into the core in 4
Sagid Salah, Enginee Reactor Systems Section 1 Reactor Operations Analysis Branch
preparation for low power testing.
            .}                                                             Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data
It is suggested, therefore, that AEOD alert Region IV of the potential for HPCS relief valve failures at River Bend similar to those which occurred at LaSalle.
-y j
f.
M N'\\
'v Sagid Salah, Enginee Reactor Systems Section 1 Reactor Operations Analysis Branch
.}
Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
 
As stated 8511260187 851031 PDR FOIA SHOLLYS5-668 PDR vA-an ow. e m...--og,.
As stated                   8511260187 851031 PDR   FOIA SHOLLYS5-668       PDR vA-       ,
_}}
an ow . e m...--og,.       , . , ,    _}}

Latest revision as of 00:21, 12 December 2024

Forwards AEOD Engineering Evaluation Rept Re HPCS Sys Relief Valve Failures.Requests That Region IV Be Notified of Potential for Valve Failures at River Bend 1
ML20137B105
Person / Time
Site: River Bend, LaSalle, 05000000
Issue date: 09/16/1985
From: Salah S
NRC OFFICE FOR ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA (AEOD)
To: Seyfrit K
NRC OFFICE FOR ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA (AEOD)
Shared Package
ML20136E841 List:
References
FOIA-85-668 NUDOCS 8511260187
Download: ML20137B105 (1)


Text

'

l

[f

+

o, UNITED STATES

, Q )(. (,

yg.sy#

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

{

E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

[

September 16, 1985

~

MEMORANDUM FOR: Karl V. Seyfrit, Chief AEOD/E513 Reactor Operations Analysis Branch Office for Analysis and Evaluation

~

of Operational Data THRU:

Stuart D. Rubin, Chief i

/

Reactor Systems Section 1 Reactor Operations Analysis ranch t

Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data FROM:

Sagid Salah, Engineer Reactor Systems Section 1 Reactor Operations Analysis Branch Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data

SUBJECT:

HIGH PRESSURE CORE SPRAY SYSTEM RELIEF VALVE FAILURES i

-)

Forwarded herewith is the subject Engineering Evaluation report for your i nformation. The results of this review indicated that excessive hydraulic forces (back pressure) from the discharge side of the HPCS discharge relief valve caused the relief valve's internal bellows seal assembly to fail at LaSalle 1 and 2.

To correct these problems, the licensee has modified the HPGS relief valve discharge path.

It is expected that this modification will eliminate the potential for HPCS relief valve bellows seal assembly failures. From a review of the other BWRs with a HPCS system, it is concluded that River Bend Unit 1 is the only other BWR potentially suscep-tible to the kind of relief valve failures which occurred at LaSalia. Both plants utilize similar relief valve discharge piping arrangements and Crosby relief valves with an internal bellows seal.

The other BWRs have sufficiently different HPCS system relief valve designs and/or discharge arrangements to rule out the potential for such valve failures at these pl ants.

River Bend Unit 1 is currently loading fuel into the core in 4

preparation for low power testing.

It is suggested, therefore, that AEOD alert Region IV of the potential for HPCS relief valve failures at River Bend similar to those which occurred at LaSalle.

-y j

f.

M N'\\

'v Sagid Salah, Enginee Reactor Systems Section 1 Reactor Operations Analysis Branch

.}

Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data

Enclosure:

As stated 8511260187 851031 PDR FOIA SHOLLYS5-668 PDR vA-an ow. e m...--og,.

_