ML20149H280: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
                                                                                        3
3M Dj
    c'                                                                                 M Dj
c'
    o
o
                                      November 9, 1994
November 9, 1994
      Commonwealth Edison Company
Commonwealth Edison Company
      ATTN: Mr. R. Querio
ATTN: Mr. R. Querio
              Site Vice President
Site Vice President
      LaSalle County Station
LaSalle County Station
      2601 North 21st Road
2601 North 21st Road
      Marseilles, IL 61341
Marseilles, IL 61341
      SUBJECT:   Notice of Violation (Inspection Report Nos. 50-373/94017(DRP);
SUBJECT:
                  EC-374/94017(DRP))
Notice of Violation (Inspection Report Nos. 50-373/94017(DRP);
      Dear Mr. Querio:
EC-374/94017(DRP))
      This refers to the inspection conducted by P. Brochman and other NRC
Dear Mr. Querio:
      inspectors, and by R. Zuffa of the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety, on
This refers to the inspection conducted by P. Brochman and other NRC
      August 20 through October 7, 1994. The inspection included a review of
inspectors, and by R. Zuffa of the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety, on
      authorized activities for your LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2,
August 20 through October 7, 1994. The inspection included a review of
      facility. At the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed
authorized activities for your LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2,
      with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.
facility. At the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed
      Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within
with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.
      these areas, the in pection consisted of selective examinations of procedures
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within
      and rerctesentative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of
these areas, the in pection consisted of selective examinations of procedures
      activities in progress.
and rerctesentative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of
      During this inspection, certain of your activities related to incorrectly
activities in progress.
      oriented orifices appeared to be in violation of NRC requirements, as
During this inspection, certain of your activities related to incorrectly
      specified in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). This violation is of
oriented orifices appeared to be in violation of NRC requirements, as
      concern because it demonstrates a continued weakness in your corrective action
specified in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). This violation is of
      program. After the close of this inspection, we identified an additional
concern because it demonstrates a continued weakness in your corrective action
      orifice that was installed backwards. In your response to the Notice of
program. After the close of this inspection, we identified an additional
      Violation, please include your plan and schedule for addressing the issue of
orifice that was installed backwards.
In your response to the Notice of
Violation, please include your plan and schedule for addressing the issue of
incorrectl.y oriented orifices in safety-related and important to safety
'
'
      incorrectl.y oriented orifices in safety-related and important to safety
systems.
      systems.
Overall, the inspectors determined that engineering performance was acceptable
      Overall, the inspectors determined that engineering performance was acceptable
with some improvements noted.
      with some improvements noted.     However, the inspectors identified a number of
However, the inspectors identified a number of
      concerns which merit continued management attention (Section 3 of this report
concerns which merit continued management attention (Section 3 of this report
      and Section 3.1 of its attachment). Some of these concerns were identified in
and Section 3.1 of its attachment).
      our inspection of progress made in fulfilling your commitments described in
Some of these concerns were identified in
      Attachment B to your April 1, 1994, response to inspection reports
our inspection of progress made in fulfilling your commitments described in
      50-373/93026; 50-374/93026 and 50-373/93035; 50-374/93035. In addition to
Attachment B to your April 1, 1994, response to inspection reports
      your required response to the Notice of Violation, we request you provide the
50-373/93026; 50-374/93026 and 50-373/93035; 50-374/93035.
      projected schedule and current status' of your corrective actions described in
In addition to
      Attachment B to your April 1,1994, response, specifically in the areas of
your required response to the Notice of Violation, we request you provide the
      equipment reliability and preventative maintenance (Sections E.2, F.4.a and
projected schedule and current status' of your corrective actions described in
      F.4.b).
Attachment B to your April 1,1994, response, specifically in the areas of
        9411220093 941109
equipment reliability and preventative maintenance (Sections E.2, F.4.a and
        PDR   ADOCK 05000373                                                       ~ -[D[;} l
F.4.b).
        G                   PDR                                                                 8
9411220093 941109
PDR
ADOCK 05000373
~ -[D[;} l
G
PDR
8


  n_ =
n_ =
        '
'
                    Commonwealth Edison Company                                         2
Commonwealth Edison Company
{       ,,
2
                    You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions
{
                    soecified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response. In your
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions
                    response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional
,,
                    actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this                                                               ,
soecified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.
                    Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future
In your
                    inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is                                                               ,
response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional
                    necassary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.                                                                           l
actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this
                                                                                                                                                                1
,
                    In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future
                    this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is
                    in the NRC Public Document Room.
,
                    The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
necassary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
                    subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
                    required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
                    We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
in the NRC Public Document Room.
                                                                          Sincerely,
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
                                                                          Edward G. Greenman, Director
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
                                                                          Division of Reactor Projects
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
                    Docket Nos. 50-373/50-373
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
                    License Nos. NPF-11; NPF-18
Sincerely,
                    Enclosures:
Edward G. Greenman, Director
                    1.     Notice of Violation
Division of Reactor Projects
                    2.       Inspection Reports                                                                                                                 !
Docket Nos. 50-373/50-373
                                No. 50-373/9e"7(DRP);
License Nos. NPF-11; NPF-18
                                No.       50-374/9 % 7(DRP)                                                                                                     ,
Enclosures:
                    cc w/ encl:           J. C. orons, Vice President,
1.
                                              Nuclear Support
Notice of Violation
                                          J. S. Perry, Vice President, BWR Operations
2.
                                          D. J. Ray, Station Manager
Inspection Reports
                                          L. Gerner, Regulatory Assurance
!
                                              Supervisor
No.
                                          D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory
50-373/9e"7(DRP);
                                              Services Manager
No.
                                          Richard Hubbard
50-374/9 % 7(DRP)
                                          Nathan Schloss, Economist
,
                                              Office of the Attorney General
cc w/ encl:
                                          State Liaison Officer
J. C. orons, Vice President,
                                          Chairman, Illinois Commerce
Nuclear Support
                                              Commission
J. S. Perry, Vice President, BWR Operations
                    Distribution:
D. J. Ray, Station Manager
                    Docket File w/ encl                                                       DRP w/ encl
L. Gerner, Regulatory Assurance
                    PUBLIC IE-01 w/ encl                                                       RIII PRR w/ encl
Supervisor
                    OC/LFDCB w/ encl                                                           W. L. Axelson, RIII w/ encl
D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory
                    SRI, LaSalle, Dresden,
Services Manager
                        Quad Cities w/ encl
Richard Hubbard
                    Project Manager, NRR w/ encl
Nathan Schloss, Economist
    DOCUMENT NAME: 7:lasa.ir\las94017.drp
Office of the Attorney General
    To esocivs a copy of this docush.. . 44ca*! *.. sne von: "C" = Uny without attachment / enclosure 'E' = Copy with attachment! enclosure 'N' = No copy
State Liaison Officer
      0FFICE         RIII                         lE     Rill                 IE RIII                     l //   RIII                 l4 RIII           lg I +
Chairman, Illinois Commerce
      NAME           Hills t eTr-                       Schweibinz$2/             Gardner/Fr #                 Creed %                   Pedersond g /o
Commission
      DATE                     //_.r       44             / /- 7 '/ y               / / - 7-1y                     w\(\\M                   n / 7/3 y
Distribution:
                                                                                                                                                          '
Docket File w/ encl
      0FFICE         RIII                       l       RIII                 l                           l                           l                 l]
DRP w/ encl
      NAME           LaTorre                             Greenman
PUBLIC IE-01 w/ encl
      DATE
RIII PRR w/ encl
OC/LFDCB w/ encl
W. L. Axelson, RIII w/ encl
SRI, LaSalle, Dresden,
Quad Cities w/ encl
Project Manager, NRR w/ encl
DOCUMENT NAME: 7:lasa.ir\\las94017.drp
To esocivs a copy of this docush.. . 44ca*! *.. sne von:
"C" = Uny without attachment / enclosure
'E' = Copy with attachment! enclosure
'N' = No copy
0FFICE
RIII
lE
Rill
IE RIII
l // RIII
l4 RIII
lg
I
+
NAME
Hills t eTr-
Schweibinz$2/
Gardner/Fr #
Creed %
Pedersond g /o
DATE
//_.r
44
/ /- 7 '/ y
/ / - 7-1y
w\\(\\\\M
n / 7/3 y
'
0FFICE
RIII
l
RIII
l
l
l
l]
NAME
LaTorre
Greenman
DATE


                                                __                 -_-                         _                 ..
__
                                                                                                                          ..             ..         .. . . _ -
-_-
    ~
_
                  Commonwealth Edison Comp iny                                       2
..
l   ~
..
                  You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions
..
                  specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response. In your
.. .
                  response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional
. _ -
                  actions you plan to prcvent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this
Commonwealth Edison Comp iny
                  Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future
2
                  inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is
~
                  necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
l
                  In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of                                                                   i
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions
                  this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
~
                  in the NRC Public Document Room.
specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.
                  The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
In your
                  subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as                                                                 i
response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional
                                                                                                                                                                '
actions you plan to prcvent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this
                  required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-511.
Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future
                  We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.                                                                     l
inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is
                                                                        Sincerely,
necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
                                                                        Edward G. Greenman, Director                                                           i
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
                  Docket Nos. 50-373/50-373
i
                  License Nos. NPF-ll; NPF-18
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
                  Enclosures:
in the NRC Public Document Room.
                  1.     Notice of Violation
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
                  2.     Inspection Reports
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
                            No.     50-373/94017(DRP);
i
                            No.     50-374/94017(DRP)
'
                  cc w/ encl:         J. C. Brons, Vice President,
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-511.
                                          Nuclear Support
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
                                      J. S. Perry, Vice President, BWR Operations
l
                                      D. J. Ray, Station Manager
Sincerely,
                                        L. Gerner, Regulatory Assurance
Edward G. Greenman, Director
                                          Supervisor
i
                                      D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory                                                                                           i
Docket Nos. 50-373/50-373
                                          Services Manager                                                                                                     I
License Nos. NPF-ll; NPF-18
                                        Richard Hubbard
Enclosures:
                                      Nathan Schloss, Economist
1.
                                          Office of the Attorney General
Notice of Violation
                                      State Liaison Officer
2.
                                      Chairman, Illinois Commerce
Inspection Reports
                                          Commission
No.
                Distribution:
50-373/94017(DRP);
                Docket File w/ encl                                                       DRP w/ encl
No.
                  PUBLIC IE-01 w/ encl                                                     RIII PPR w/ encl
50-374/94017(DRP)
                OC/LFDCB w/ encl                                                           W. L. Axelson, RIII w/ encl
cc w/ encl:
                SRI, LaSalie, Dresden,
J. C. Brons, Vice President,
                      Quad Cities w/ encl
Nuclear Support
                  Project Manager, NRR w/ encl                                         (SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE)
J. S. Perry, Vice President, BWR Operations
  DOCUMENT NAME: g:lasa.ir\las94017.drp
D. J. Ray, Station Manager
  To ,ecela a copy of this document, indicate in the boa: "C" - Copy without attachment / enclosure *E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure *N' = No copy
L. Gerner, Regulatory Assurance
  0FFICE         RIII                       l     RIII                 l     RIII                 l     RIII                   l     Rill
Supervisor
  NAME           Hills                             Schweibinz                 Gardner                     Creed                         Pederson
D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory
  DATE
i
  OFFICE         RIII       ,Qs ( l (, RIII                     ',l           Rill                 l                             l                     l
Services Manager
  NAME           AxelsonB \. \ ,3 LaTorts f                                     Greeruhn
I
  DATE                       \ % \'M                       '
Richard Hubbard
                                                                '(!                   h\nM
Nathan Schloss, Economist
                                  .       .                                                                                                                   J
Office of the Attorney General
State Liaison Officer
Chairman, Illinois Commerce
Commission
Distribution:
Docket File w/ encl
DRP w/ encl
PUBLIC IE-01 w/ encl
RIII PPR w/ encl
OC/LFDCB w/ encl
W. L. Axelson, RIII w/ encl
SRI, LaSalie, Dresden,
Quad Cities w/ encl
Project Manager, NRR w/ encl
(SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE)
DOCUMENT NAME: g:lasa.ir\\las94017.drp
To ,ecela a copy of this document, indicate in the boa: "C" - Copy without attachment / enclosure
*E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure
*N' = No copy
0FFICE
RIII
l
RIII
l
RIII
l
RIII
l
Rill
NAME
Hills
Schweibinz
Gardner
Creed
Pederson
DATE
OFFICE
RIII
,Qs ( l (, RIII
',l
Rill
l
l
l
NAME
AxelsonB \\. \\ ,3
LaTorts f
Greeruhn
DATE
\\
% \\'M
'(!
h\\nM
'
.
.
J
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 09:26, 11 December 2024

Forwards Insp Repts 50-373/94-17 & 50-374/94-17 on 940820-1007 & Notice of Violation
ML20149H280
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  
Issue date: 11/09/1994
From: Greenman E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Querio R
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20149H281 List:
References
NUDOCS 9411220093
Download: ML20149H280 (3)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000373/1994017

Text

.

3M Dj

c'

o

November 9, 1994

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN: Mr. R. Querio

Site Vice President

LaSalle County Station

2601 North 21st Road

Marseilles, IL 61341

SUBJECT:

Notice of Violation (Inspection Report Nos. 50-373/94017(DRP);

EC-374/94017(DRP))

Dear Mr. Querio:

This refers to the inspection conducted by P. Brochman and other NRC

inspectors, and by R. Zuffa of the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety, on

August 20 through October 7, 1994. The inspection included a review of

authorized activities for your LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2,

facility. At the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed

with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within

these areas, the in pection consisted of selective examinations of procedures

and rerctesentative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of

activities in progress.

During this inspection, certain of your activities related to incorrectly

oriented orifices appeared to be in violation of NRC requirements, as

specified in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice). This violation is of

concern because it demonstrates a continued weakness in your corrective action

program. After the close of this inspection, we identified an additional

orifice that was installed backwards.

In your response to the Notice of

Violation, please include your plan and schedule for addressing the issue of

incorrectl.y oriented orifices in safety-related and important to safety

'

systems.

Overall, the inspectors determined that engineering performance was acceptable

with some improvements noted.

However, the inspectors identified a number of

concerns which merit continued management attention (Section 3 of this report

and Section 3.1 of its attachment).

Some of these concerns were identified in

our inspection of progress made in fulfilling your commitments described in

Attachment B to your April 1, 1994, response to inspection reports

50-373/93026; 50-374/93026 and 50-373/93035; 50-374/93035.

In addition to

your required response to the Notice of Violation, we request you provide the

projected schedule and current status' of your corrective actions described in

Attachment B to your April 1,1994, response, specifically in the areas of

equipment reliability and preventative maintenance (Sections E.2, F.4.a and

F.4.b).

9411220093 941109

PDR

ADOCK 05000373

~ -[D[;} l

G

PDR

8

n_ =

'

Commonwealth Edison Company

2

{

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions

,,

soecified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.

In your

response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional

actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this

,

Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future

inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is

,

necassary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed

in the NRC Public Document Room.

The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

Edward G. Greenman, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos. 50-373/50-373

License Nos. NPF-11; NPF-18

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection Reports

!

No.

50-373/9e"7(DRP);

No.

50-374/9 % 7(DRP)

,

cc w/ encl:

J. C. orons, Vice President,

Nuclear Support

J. S. Perry, Vice President, BWR Operations

D. J. Ray, Station Manager

L. Gerner, Regulatory Assurance

Supervisor

D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory

Services Manager

Richard Hubbard

Nathan Schloss, Economist

Office of the Attorney General

State Liaison Officer

Chairman, Illinois Commerce

Commission

Distribution:

Docket File w/ encl

DRP w/ encl

PUBLIC IE-01 w/ encl

RIII PRR w/ encl

OC/LFDCB w/ encl

W. L. Axelson, RIII w/ encl

SRI, LaSalle, Dresden,

Quad Cities w/ encl

Project Manager, NRR w/ encl

DOCUMENT NAME: 7:lasa.ir\\las94017.drp

To esocivs a copy of this docush.. . 44ca*! *.. sne von:

"C" = Uny without attachment / enclosure

'E' = Copy with attachment! enclosure

'N' = No copy

0FFICE

RIII

lE

Rill

IE RIII

l // RIII

l4 RIII

lg

I

+

NAME

Hills t eTr-

Schweibinz$2/

Gardner/Fr #

Creed %

Pedersond g /o

DATE

//_.r

44

/ /- 7 '/ y

/ / - 7-1y

w\\(\\\\M

n / 7/3 y

'

0FFICE

RIII

l

RIII

l

l

l

l]

NAME

LaTorre

Greenman

DATE

__

-_-

_

..

..

..

.. .

. _ -

Commonwealth Edison Comp iny

2

~

l

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions

~

specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.

In your

response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional

actions you plan to prcvent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this

Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future

inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is

necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

i

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed

in the NRC Public Document Room.

The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as

i

'

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No.96-511.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

l

Sincerely,

Edward G. Greenman, Director

i

Docket Nos. 50-373/50-373

License Nos. NPF-ll; NPF-18

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection Reports

No.

50-373/94017(DRP);

No.

50-374/94017(DRP)

cc w/ encl:

J. C. Brons, Vice President,

Nuclear Support

J. S. Perry, Vice President, BWR Operations

D. J. Ray, Station Manager

L. Gerner, Regulatory Assurance

Supervisor

D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory

i

Services Manager

I

Richard Hubbard

Nathan Schloss, Economist

Office of the Attorney General

State Liaison Officer

Chairman, Illinois Commerce

Commission

Distribution:

Docket File w/ encl

DRP w/ encl

PUBLIC IE-01 w/ encl

RIII PPR w/ encl

OC/LFDCB w/ encl

W. L. Axelson, RIII w/ encl

SRI, LaSalie, Dresden,

Quad Cities w/ encl

Project Manager, NRR w/ encl

(SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE)

DOCUMENT NAME: g:lasa.ir\\las94017.drp

To ,ecela a copy of this document, indicate in the boa: "C" - Copy without attachment / enclosure

  • E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure
  • N' = No copy

0FFICE

RIII

l

RIII

l

RIII

l

RIII

l

Rill

NAME

Hills

Schweibinz

Gardner

Creed

Pederson

DATE

OFFICE

RIII

,Qs ( l (, RIII

',l

Rill

l

l

l

NAME

AxelsonB \\. \\ ,3

LaTorts f

Greeruhn

DATE

\\

% \\'M

'(!

h\\nM

'

.

.

J

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20149H280&oldid=4167232"