ML20153A813

ES-301-4

ML20153A813
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	04/10/2020
From:	Gregory Roach Exelon Generation Co
To:	NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Roach G
Shared Package
ML19121A186	List: ML20153A789 ML20153A791 ML20153A795 ML20153A798 ML20153A801 ML20153A803 ML20153A806 ML20153A811 ML20153A813 ML20153A814 ML20153A817
References
Download: ML20153A813 (1)

Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Quad Cities Date of Exam: 3-16-2020 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: HM QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b" c1' 1.

The lnlUal conditions arereallstic In that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, q -

but it does not cue the operators Into expected events.

"b 2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

9 <"I\\

3.

Each event description consists of the following:

the point in the scenario when it Is to be Initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event



the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 9 SA>

the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (If applicable) 4.

The events are valld wth regard to physics and thermodynamics.

r;
6'

5.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete If s1l> 

evaluaon results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

9 Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

 Gz Cues are given.

7.

The simulator modeling ls not altered.

r.; I

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 1 0 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance 9



deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional SH>

fidelity Is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Scenarios are new or significantiy modified in accordance With Section D.5 of Es-301.

{/ Sit) &i 10. All Individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the 9 

bf fonn along with the simulator scenarios).

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable 9 Sf\\) G, rating factors. (Competency rating factors as desaibed on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be slgnificanUy involved In the minimum number of transients and events specified 9  Ci on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preldenUfled critical tasks across scenarios, v.tien r;_ 



possible.

14. The level. of difficulty Is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

l,/ 

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes 1.

Malfunctions after EOP entry. (1-2) 1/1/2/2

{/_ <l)) U\\

2.

Abnormal events (2-4)

,Iii /./tt4/414

'{./ 6"'1



3.

Major transients (1-2) 1/1/2/1 l}

 l\\

4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 / 1 / 212 cJ l<PrJ 0 5.

Entry Into a contingency EOP v..th substantive actions e 1 per scenario 1/1/2/1 q o set) 6.

Preidentified critical tasks (? 2) 2/2/3/2 GJ  r;,

• The facility licensee signature Is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

I

1. An Independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.