ML20153A813
| ML20153A813 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities |
| Issue date: | 04/10/2020 |
| From: | Gregory Roach Exelon Generation Co |
| To: | NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| Roach G | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19121A186 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML20153A813 (1) | |
Text
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Quad Cities Date of Exam: 3-16-2020 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: HM QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
b" c1' 1.
The lnlUal conditions arereallstic In that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, q -
but it does not cue the operators Into expected events.
- "b 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
9 <"I\\
3.
Each event description consists of the following:
the point in the scenario when it Is to be Initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event
the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 9 SA>
the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (If applicable) 4.
The events are valld wth regard to physics and thermodynamics.
r; 6'
- 5.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete If s1l>
evaluaon results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
6.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
9 Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Gz Cues are given.
- 7.
The simulator modeling ls not altered.
r.; I
8.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 1 0 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance 9
deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional SH>
fidelity Is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
9.
Scenarios are new or significantiy modified in accordance With Section D.5 of Es-301.
{/ Sit) &i 10. All Individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the 9
bf fonn along with the simulator scenarios).
- 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable 9 Sf\\) G, rating factors. (Competency rating factors as desaibed on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
- 12. Each applicant will be slgnificanUy involved In the minimum number of transients and events specified 9 Ci on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preldenUfled critical tasks across scenarios, v.tien r;_
possible.
- 14. The level. of difficulty Is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
l,/
Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d)
Actual Attributes 1.
Malfunctions after EOP entry. (1-2) 1/1/2/2
{/_ <l)) U\\
2.
Abnormal events (2-4)
,Iii /./tt4/414
'{./ 6"'1
3.
Major transients (1-2) 1/1/2/1 l}
l\\
4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 / 1 / 212 cJ l<PrJ 0 5.
Entry Into a contingency EOP v..th substantive actions e 1 per scenario 1/1/2/1 q o set) 6.
Preidentified critical tasks (? 2) 2/2/3/2 GJ r;,
- The facility licensee signature Is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
I
- An Independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.