ML20212B903: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 20: Line 20:
{{#Wiki_filter:*
{{#Wiki_filter:*
. . .
. . .
                                                  FEB 2 51987
FEB 2 51987
        Docket Nos.   50-272                                     License Nos. DPR-70
Docket Nos.
                        50-311                                                   DPR-75
50-272
        Public Service Electric and Gas Company
License Nos. DPR-70
        ATTN: Mr. Corbin A. McNeill, Jr.
50-311
                Vice President - Nuclear
DPR-75
        P. O. Box 236
Public Service Electric and Gas Company
        Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038
ATTN: Mr. Corbin A. McNeill, Jr.
        Gentlemen:
Vice President - Nuclear
        Subject:   Inspection Report Nos. 50-272/87-02 and 50-311/87-02
P. O. Box 236
        This letter refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. K. Manoly
Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038
        of this office on January 12-16, 1987 at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station
Gentlemen:
        Units 1 and 2. Mr. K. Manoly discussed the results of the inspection with Mr.
Subject:
        B. Preston of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection. Our findings
Inspection Report Nos. 50-272/87-02 and 50-311/87-02
        were further discussed in a telephone conversation between Mr. J. Strosnider
This letter refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. K. Manoly
        of my staff and Mr. B. Preston on February 18, 1987.
of this office on January 12-16, 1987 at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station
        Areas examined during this inspection are described in the NRC Region I Inspection
Units 1 and 2.
        Report which is enclosed with this letter. Within these areas, the inspection
Mr. K. Manoly discussed the results of the inspection with Mr.
        consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records,
B. Preston of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection. Our findings
        interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
were further discussed in a telephone conversation between Mr. J. Strosnider
                                                                                          .
of my staff and Mr. B. Preston on February 18, 1987.
        Our inspector also verified the steps you have taken to correct the violation
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the NRC Region I Inspection
        brought to your attention in the enclosure to our letter dated April 7, 1986.
Report which is enclosed with this letter. Within these areas, the inspection
        We have no further questions regarding your action at this time.
consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records,
        Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that some of your activities
interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
        were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as set forth in
.
        the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A. This violation has
Our inspector also verified the steps you have taken to correct the violation
        been categorized by severity level in accordance with the revised NRC Enforce-
brought to your attention in the enclosure to our letter dated April 7, 1986.
        ment Policy (10 CFR 2, Appendix C) published in the Federal Register Notice (49
We have no further questions regarding your action at this time.
        FR 8583) dated March 8, 1984. You are required to respond to this letter. In
Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that some of your activities
        preparing your response, you should follow the instructions in Appendix A, and
were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as set forth in
        alsc. indicate your assessment of: (1) the apparent similarity between the
the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A.
        weaknesses relating to the design interface and plant configuration control as
This violation has
        evidenced by our findings in this inspection in the mechanical / structural area
been categorized by severity level in accordance with the revised NRC Enforce-
        and in inspection No. 311/86-26 in the electrical area regarding the addition
ment Policy (10 CFR 2, Appendix C) published in the Federal Register Notice (49
        of electrical loads without determining their effects on the transient response
FR 8583) dated March 8, 1984. You are required to respond to this letter.
        of the electrical systems, and (2) the apparent lack of detailed review of your
In
        contractors technical report as noted during our examination of Franklin Research
preparing your response, you should follow the instructions in Appendix A, and
        report on testing of piping anchor U-bolt assemblies.
alsc. indicate your assessment of: (1) the apparent similarity between the
        The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not subject
weaknesses relating to the design interface and plant configuration control as
        to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required
evidenced by our findings in this inspection in the mechanical / structural area
        by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
and in inspection No. 311/86-26 in the electrical area regarding the addition
                                    OFFICIAL RECORD COPY     CIR SALEM 87-02 - 0001.0.0
of electrical loads without determining their effects on the transient response
                                                              02/20/87
of the electrical systems, and (2) the apparent lack of detailed review of your
      E OS$ $ [50bb272   PDH
contractors technical report as noted during our examination of Franklin Research
                                                                            T-60 l
report on testing of piping anchor U-bolt assemblies.
      0
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not subject
                                                                                  I I
to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
CIR SALEM 87-02 - 0001.0.0
02/20/87
E OS$ $ [50bb272
T-60 l
PDH
0
I I


.
.
. Public Service Electric and Gas Co.         2
Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
  Your cooperation with us in this matter is appreciated.
2
                                              Sincerely,
.
                                              Oricinal Sicned.B7:       f   ,
Your cooperation with us in this matter is appreciated.
                                                        Y           ,
Sincerely,
                                                Stewart D. Ebneter,(D rector
Oricinal Sicned.B7:
                                              Division of Reactor Safety
f
  Enclosure: Combined NRC Region I Inspection Report No. 50-272/87-02 and
,
                50-311/87-02.
Y
  cc w/ encl:
,
  J. M. Zupko, Jr., General Manager - Salem Operations
Stewart D. Ebneter,(D rector
  B. A. Preston, Manager, Licensing and Regulation
Division of Reactor Safety
  C. P. Johnson, Manager - Quality Assurance Nuclear Operations
Enclosure: Combined NRC Region I Inspection Report No. 50-272/87-02 and
  General Manager - Nuclear Safety Review
50-311/87-02.
  M. J. Wetterhahn, Esquire
cc w/ encl:
  R. Fryling, Jr. , Esquire
J. M. Zupko, Jr., General Manager - Salem Operations
  Public Document Room (PDR)
B. A. Preston, Manager, Licensing and Regulation
  Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
C. P. Johnson, Manager - Quality Assurance Nuclear Operations
  Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
General Manager - Nuclear Safety Review
  NRC Resident Inspector
M. J. Wetterhahn, Esquire
  State of New Jersey
R. Fryling, Jr. , Esquire
  bcc w/ enc 1:
Public Document Room (PDR)
  Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
  Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o encl)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
  DRP Section Chief
NRC Resident Inspector
  Robert J. Bores, DRSS
State of New Jersey
                                      WV
bcc w/ enc 1:
  RI:DRS           i
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
                    RI:DRS       J I:DRS
Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o encl)
  Manol /ca         Strosnider   F Durr
DRP Section Chief
  1/ w/87           1/20/87         $/Jf87
Robert J. Bores, DRSS
                                0FFICIAL RECORD COPY       CIR SALEM 87-02 - 0001.1.0
WV
                                                          02/20/87
RI:DRS
RI:DRS
J I:DRS
i
Manol /ca
Strosnider
F Durr
1/ w/87
1/20/87
$/Jf87
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
CIR SALEM 87-02 - 0001.1.0
02/20/87
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 08:00, 5 December 2024

Forwards Insp Repts 50-272/87-02 & 50-311/87-02 on 870112- 16 & Notice of Violation
ML20212B903
Person / Time
Site: Salem  
Issue date: 02/25/1987
From: Ebneter S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Mcneil C
Public Service Enterprise Group
Shared Package
ML20212B909 List:
References
NUDOCS 8703030666
Download: ML20212B903 (2)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000272/1987002

Text

. . .

FEB 2 51987

Docket Nos.

50-272

License Nos. DPR-70

50-311

DPR-75

Public Service Electric and Gas Company

ATTN: Mr. Corbin A. McNeill, Jr.

Vice President - Nuclear

P. O. Box 236

Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Inspection Report Nos. 50-272/87-02 and 50-311/87-02

This letter refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. K. Manoly

of this office on January 12-16, 1987 at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station

Units 1 and 2.

Mr. K. Manoly discussed the results of the inspection with Mr.

B. Preston of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection. Our findings

were further discussed in a telephone conversation between Mr. J. Strosnider

of my staff and Mr. B. Preston on February 18, 1987.

Areas examined during this inspection are described in the NRC Region I Inspection

Report which is enclosed with this letter. Within these areas, the inspection

consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records,

interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.

.

Our inspector also verified the steps you have taken to correct the violation

brought to your attention in the enclosure to our letter dated April 7, 1986.

We have no further questions regarding your action at this time.

Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that some of your activities

were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as set forth in

the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A.

This violation has

been categorized by severity level in accordance with the revised NRC Enforce-

ment Policy (10 CFR 2, Appendix C) published in the Federal Register Notice (49 FR 8583) dated March 8, 1984. You are required to respond to this letter.

In

preparing your response, you should follow the instructions in Appendix A, and

alsc. indicate your assessment of: (1) the apparent similarity between the

weaknesses relating to the design interface and plant configuration control as

evidenced by our findings in this inspection in the mechanical / structural area

and in inspection No. 311/86-26 in the electrical area regarding the addition

of electrical loads without determining their effects on the transient response

of the electrical systems, and (2) the apparent lack of detailed review of your

contractors technical report as noted during our examination of Franklin Research

report on testing of piping anchor U-bolt assemblies.

The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not subject

to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required

by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

CIR SALEM 87-02 - 0001.0.0

02/20/87

E OS$ $ [50bb272

T-60 l

PDH

0

I I

.

Public Service Electric and Gas Co.

2

.

Your cooperation with us in this matter is appreciated.

Sincerely,

Oricinal Sicned.B7:

f

,

Y

,

Stewart D. Ebneter,(D rector

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosure: Combined NRC Region I Inspection Report No. 50-272/87-02 and

50-311/87-02.

cc w/ encl:

J. M. Zupko, Jr., General Manager - Salem Operations

B. A. Preston, Manager, Licensing and Regulation

C. P. Johnson, Manager - Quality Assurance Nuclear Operations

General Manager - Nuclear Safety Review

M. J. Wetterhahn, Esquire

R. Fryling, Jr. , Esquire

Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident Inspector

State of New Jersey

bcc w/ enc 1:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o encl)

DRP Section Chief

Robert J. Bores, DRSS

WV

RI:DRS

RI:DRS

J I:DRS

i

Manol /ca

Strosnider

F Durr

1/ w/87

1/20/87

$/Jf87

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

CIR SALEM 87-02 - 0001.1.0

02/20/87

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20212B903&oldid=4001651"