ML20129J681: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[IA-84-311, Recommends That V Stello Be Requested to Give Yes or No Answer to Listed Question Re Util Playing Down Seriousness of Facility Incident in Initial Dealings W/Commonwealth of PA]]
| number = ML20129J681
| issue date = 11/09/1981
| title = Recommends That V Stello Be Requested to Give Yes or No Answer to Listed Question Re Util Playing Down Seriousness of Facility Incident in Initial Dealings W/Commonwealth of PA
| author name = Gilinsky V
| author affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
| addressee name = Ahearne, Bradford, Palladino
| addressee affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
| docket = 05000320
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = FOIA-84-311
| document report number = NUDOCS 8507230228
| package number = ML20127A105
| document type = INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM, MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 2
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.                  _      __ .            _ - . . .            . _ - .    -          _ . _ _ _ . . - _ . . _ _ _ _ - - _ . - , _ _ _
        -a
    * ' 7#"%*o
                                                                                                \
UNITED S'TATES l
cornell Rehm f.#      l d
i                    I g                              NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                                        Stello g-                    gE                                          WASHINGTON. D.C. 20555                                                  Shapar Denton g% y,,, +'/                                                                                                                              DeYoung CPFICE OF THE                                                            November 9, 1981 COMMIS$10NER                                                          ,
F MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN PALLADINO COMMISSIONER BRADFORD,                                                                          .
                                          .                  COMMISSIONER AHEARNE COMMISSIONER ROBERTS
 
==SUBJECT:==
TMI MANAGEMENT COMPETENCE s
In view of the' confusion which continues to surround this
                  -      issue, I think we should ask Vic Stello~to provide a one-                                                                                        '
word, "yes" or "no", answer to the following question:
                                    "In your, opinion, did GPU on the first day of the TMI accident knowingly pl'ay down the seriousness of the                                                                                  ,
accident in.its dealings with the Commonwealth of
                              - 4ennsylvania, in spite of the substantial evidence in                                                                                      '
its possession that the accident was serious?"
                                                                                                    .'                    ,/          ,;
ictor Gilins y cc:        SECY.
OGC 0                                  OPE
                          , \ EDO                    '
O t
                                                                                                                                                                /.f~
 
i November 17, 1981 Questions raised with Mr. DeYoung                                                                                                    .
: 1.          Gary Miller is presently ' Director of Startup and Test for GPU Nuclear.
He is stationed in the Harrisburg area.
: 2.            Ivan Porter is also with GPU~ Nuclear. ' Supervisor of Startup and' Test for TMI Unit 1. Stationed in the Harrisburg area.
: 3.            The two reports - Haynes and Moseley, are generally consistent. The Moseley report is closer to the Udall report's position than is the s                        Haynes r.eport. The bottom line on the Haynes report is that while
'                        we did not receive complete information from TMI Met Ed, we did receive sufficient information within the Commission that we should have known the state of conditions in the TMI accident.
O o
O 9
e e
6 6
              - _-._._ -_-_ ___ -_      - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - - - . - _ . _ - - - _ _ . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _}}

Revision as of 17:33, 2 September 2020