ML20153A813

ES-301-4

ML20153A813
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	04/10/2020
From:	Gregory Roach Exelon Generation Co
To:	NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Roach G
Shared Package
ML19121A186	List: ML20153A789 ML20153A791 ML20153A795 ML20153A798 ML20153A801 ML20153A803 ML20153A806 ML20153A811 ML20153A813 ML20153A814 ML20153A817
References
Download: ML20153A813 (1)

Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Quad Cities Date of Exam: 3-16-2020 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: HM QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b" c1' 1.

2.

The lnlUal conditions arereallstic In that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators Into expected events.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

q9 - :"b

<"I\

3. Each event description consists of the following:

• the point in the scenario when it Is to be Initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (If applicable) 9 SA>

4. The events are valld wth regard to physics and thermodynamics. r; 6' If

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluaon results commensurate with the scenario objectives. s1l>

9

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given. Gz

7. The simulator modeling ls not altered. r.; I 9

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 1 0 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity Is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

SH>

9. Scenarios are new or significantiy modified in accordance With Section D.5 of Es-301. {/ Sit) &i 10 . All Individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the fonn along with the simulator scenarios). 9 bf

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency rating factors as desaibed on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) 9 Sf\) G,

12. Each applicant will be slgnificanUy involved In the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). 9 Ci r;_

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preldenUfled critical tasks across scenarios, v.tien possible.

14. The level. of difficulty Is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. l,/

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- -

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry. (1-2) 1/1/2/2 {/_ <l)) U\

2. Abnormal events (2-4) ,Iii /./tt4/414 '{./ 6"'1

3. Major transients (1-2) 1/1/2/1 l} l\

cJ l<PrJ 0 qGJ o r;,

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/1/212

5. e Entry Into a contingency EOP v..th substantive actions 1 per scenario 1/1/2/1 set)

6. Preidentified critical tasks (?2) 2/2/3/2

• The facility licensee signature Is not applicable for NRC- developed tests. I

1. An Independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.