ML18106A082: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML18106A082 | | number = ML18106A082 | ||
| issue date = 04/16/2018 | | issue date = 04/16/2018 | ||
| title = Monticello Nuclear Plant - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Risk-Informed Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix R III.G.2.a Requirements for Exposed Structural Steel | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - Monticello Nuclear Plant - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Risk-Informed Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix R III.G.2.a Requirements for Exposed Structural Steel | ||
| author name = Kuntz R | | author name = Kuntz R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | ||
| addressee name = Jurek S | | addressee name = Jurek S | ||
| addressee affiliation = Xcel Energy Services, Inc | | addressee affiliation = Xcel Energy Services, Inc | ||
| docket = 05000263 | | docket = 05000263 | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Kuntz, Robert Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 8:20 AM To: Jurek, Shane M. | ||
==Subject:== | |||
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: | |||
Risk-Informed Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix R III.G.2.a Requirements for Exposed Structural Steel (EPID: L-2018-LLE-0001) | |||
Mr. Jurek, By letter dated March 21, 2018, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, doing business as Xcel Energy, submitted an exemption for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this exemption request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | |||
Based on the information provided in your submittal and discussions during the pre-licensing meeting on February 8, 2018, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::450 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is April 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | |||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | |||
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1 | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 298 Mail Envelope Properties (BY1PR09MB0421A70F7F05D4B7E5D92D4999B00) | |||
==Subject:== | |||
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: Risk-Informed Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix R III.G.2.a Requirements for Exposed Structural Steel (EPID: L-2018-LLE-0001) | |||
Sent Date: 4/16/2018 8:20:14 AM Received Date: 4/16/2018 8:20:15 AM From: Kuntz, Robert Created By: Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov Recipients: | |||
"Jurek, Shane M." <Shane.Jurek@xenuclear.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: BY1PR09MB0421.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2737 4/16/2018 8:20:15 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received:}} |
Latest revision as of 10:57, 7 March 2020
ML18106A082 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Monticello ![]() |
Issue date: | 04/16/2018 |
From: | Robert Kuntz Plant Licensing Branch III |
To: | Jurek S Xcel Energy Services |
References | |
L-2018-LLE-0001 | |
Download: ML18106A082 (2) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Kuntz, Robert Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 8:20 AM To: Jurek, Shane M.
Subject:
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re:
Risk-Informed Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix R III.G.2.a Requirements for Exposed Structural Steel (EPID: L-2018-LLE-0001)
Mr. Jurek, By letter dated March 21, 2018, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, doing business as Xcel Energy, submitted an exemption for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this exemption request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal and discussions during the pre-licensing meeting on February 8, 2018, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 450 hours18.75 days <br />2.679 weeks <br />0.616 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is April 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 298 Mail Envelope Properties (BY1PR09MB0421A70F7F05D4B7E5D92D4999B00)
Subject:
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: Risk-Informed Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix R III.G.2.a Requirements for Exposed Structural Steel (EPID: L-2018-LLE-0001)
Sent Date: 4/16/2018 8:20:14 AM Received Date: 4/16/2018 8:20:15 AM From: Kuntz, Robert Created By: Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Jurek, Shane M." <Shane.Jurek@xenuclear.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: BY1PR09MB0421.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2737 4/16/2018 8:20:15 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: