ML17252B049

Answers to AEC Questions on Quality Assurance for Operations - Dresden Unit 3

ML17252B049
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	01/07/1974
From:	Commonwealth Edison Co
To:	US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
References
Download: ML17252B049 (145)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:50-249 ANSWERS TO AEC QUESTION ON QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR OPERATIONS 1-7-74 THE.ATTACHED FILES ARE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE OFFICE OF REGULATION. THEY HAVE BEEN CHARGED TO YOU FOR A LIMITED TIME PERIOD AND MUST BE RETURNED TO THE CENTRAL RECORDS STATION 008. ANY PAGE(S) REMOVED FOR REPRODUCTION MUST BE RETURNED TO ITS/THEIR ORIGINAL ORDER.

~  DEADLINE RETURN DATE 2

0 g

• z n m

W. L. DONALDSON, CHIEF CENTRAL RECORDS STATION

SECTION I ANSWERS TO AEC QUESTIONS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR OPERATIONS JANUARY 7 1974

1. Describe the qualification req~irements for the position res~onsible for directing and managing the Quality Assurance Program for Station Operations. ,

The Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems directs the quality assurance activities of the Quality Assurance Program for Operations. The qualification requirements for the position of the Superintendent of Nuc.lear and Fossil Systems includes having a wo~king knowledge of the Quality Assurarice Program for Operations and nuclear plant engineering, construction and

• operating activities within CECo as well as functional inter-faces with working organizations outside the company. Education requirement is a 4egree in a scientific disciplirie or eq~ivalent.

The Quality Assurance Adminstrator (Production) reports to the Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems and is responsible for administering the quality assurance activities of the Quality Assurance Program for Operations. The qualification requirements for the position of Quality Assurance Adminis_trator (Production) are a working knowledge of the Quality Assurance Program for Operations an4 a degree in a scient~ti6 discipline or eq ui valen t. *

2. Describe the indoctrination and training program utilized by CECo to assure the necessary skills in their Quality Assurance personnel and others performing quality related activities.

IndoGtrination and training of personnel performing activities involving quality assurance shall include special training pro-grams, internal and external to the Company and on~the-job. training. The Quality Assurance Program for Operations provides that suitable proficiency is developed and maintained to compl -l\.--.-- wi th the requirements of ANSI N 18.1, "Selection and Trainin ' - of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel" and the Codes contained i. ~> AJu~KETEo

  *the engineering specifications for activities involving qu * -'tJMAR USJEc assurance work.                                      * *.    ~-           S 1974 A staff engineer in the Office of the Manager of Productio ~

REGULATOR~*

                                                                     ;~~~ETSECCLETtoN *.

coordinates training activities for Commonwealth's generatf RK. stations. He coordinates the preparation of training materi surveillance of on-the-job instruction, and the scheduling*of off-site training. He also coordinates the scheduling of simulator training facilities (Ref. 1, Par. 2.1.J.5).

3. In Figure 1, Page Ql.5-4 of the Zion Station Operations Quality Assurance Program which Dresden Unit 2 will use, the Quality Assurance Coordinators are shown reporting to group leaders who

   .have direct responsibility for performing the work being verified.

1833

With this organizational arrangement, clarify how CECo will assure that the Quality Assurance Coordinators will have suf-ficient authority and organizational freedom to effectively perform their-quality related functions. (See Engineering - Construction Section)

4. In Figure 1, Page Ql.5-4 of the Zion Station Operations Quality Assurance Program which Dresden Unit 2 will use, the field engineers who perform acceptance inspection report to super-visors who have direct responsibility for schedules. Clarify how CECo will assure sufficient authority and organizational freedom to effectively perform their quality related functions.

(See Engineering - Construction Section)

5. Identify ~ny Quality Assurance positioris which have the dele-gated authority and responsibility to stop unsatisfactory work or stop further processing of unsatisfactory material. '

The Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems, or his designated alternate has the authority to order unit shutdown or request any other action which he deems necessary to avoid unsafe plant conditions, as stated in the Technical Specifi-cations of the Operating License. The* Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems assigns to each nuc,lear generating station a Quality Assurance Engineer reporting to the Quality Assurance Administrator (Production) to provide surveillance of the Station ~ctivities. (~ef. 1, Pa~. 2.1.3.1.1). e If Technical Specification requirements or approved procedures are not properly implemented the Quality Assurance Engineer may secure appro'priate correction of such deficiency by contact with the responsible station management, or, if appropriate action is not obtained, he may immediately advise the Office of the Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems to secure _appropriate corr~ction .of the deficiency.

6. Identify the physical location of the Quality Assurance Engineer (site or headquarters) and describe the nature of his activities at the site. -

The Quality Assurance Engineer is located at the station and has (Ref. 1, Par. 2.1.3.1.1) the authority and responsibility for the surveillance of: -

a. The preparation and revision of the Program prbcedures for administration, maintenance and operations, _

b. Implementation of the Program,

c. The completion of documentation that required inspections and tests were performed,

d. The completion of reported corrective action;

.*e e. The incorporation of approved engineering changes into station maintenance and operating procedures.

7. Describe how the Quality Assurance Coordinator in ~harge of the Quality Assuran~e Engineer coordinates with the other Quality Assurance organizations and assures an overall effec-t-ive Quality Assurance Program for Station Operation.

The Quality Assurance Administrator (Production) is responsible (Ref. 1, Par. 2.1.3.1.1) for the review and approval of Quality Procedures and changes thereto prepared for the Operations

  .Quality Assurance Program for compliance with the policy con-tained in Reference 1. Drafts of the procedures and their revisions ar~ transmitted to the Office of the Manager of Quality Assurance and effected organizations for review and comments .. *The comments are included or 'resolved in accordance with established procedures.

8. Describe those provisions of the Quality Assurance Program which assure that the applicable Regulatory Guides and the Orange Book "Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements* During the Operations Phase of Nuclear Power Plants" dated October 26, 1973 are considered and that these guides or acceptable alter-natives are adequately implemented.

The provisions are provided by the following answer:

a. Applicable Regulatory Guides The conformance with the applicable Regulatory* Guides is.

assessed in References 2 and 3.

b. Orange Book (1) Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Regulatory Guide 1.33 Compliance.to the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Regulatory Guide 1.33 is described in the Operations Quality Assurance Program Descrip-tion (Ref. 1). Station procedures are currently being revised to the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1. 33 as stated in the application for con.ver-sion from provisional to full term Operating License.

(2) lD CFR Part 55 - Operators' Lice~ses and its Appendix A - . Requalification Programs for Licensed Operators of Production and Utilization Facilities Retraining and replacement training of station personnel is in accordance with ANSI 18.1 "Selection and Training of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel", dated March 8, 1971 as required by the Dresden 2 Technical Specifications. (3) Regulatory Guides 1.8, 1.30, 1.37, 1.38, 1.39, 1.58, and 1.64 , The conformance with these Regulatory Guides is assessed in References 2 and 3.

( 4) Paragraph 50. 55a, Codes .and Standards, of 10 CFR Part 50, Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities (ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Sec. XI - 1971 - Rules for Inservice Inspecti6n of Nuclea~ Reactor Coolant System The inservice inspection program described in Section 4.6.F of the Dresden 2 Technical Specifi-cation was based on Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 1971. ( 5) Regulatory Guide 1. 68, "Preoperational and Initial Sta,rtup Program::; for Water-Cooled Power Reactors" The Preoperational and Initial Startup Program is described in Section 13 of the.FSAR. (6) Extracts from ANSI N 45.2.8 - Supplementary Quality Assurance Requirements for Installationi Inspection, and Testing of Mechanical Equipment and Systems for the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants The Quality Assurance Requirements by which the Dresden 2 installation, inspecti6n, and testing of mechanical equipment and systems was accomplished is described in Appendix E of the FSAR. Adequate implementation of the Quality Assurance Program is assured by aud~ting the records required by the program in accordance with the requirements of the TechnicalSpecifications.

9. Describe the measures used to control changes and/or revisions to procurement documents.

Changes to engineering and quality assurance documentation requirements contained in procurement specifications and drawings require the approval of the .CECo Engineering Dep~rtment respon-sible for the requirement.

10. Identify the organizational .components that perform inspection:s and tests on safety-related structures, systems and components.

The Station Maintenance or Instrument Engineer are responsible for providing maintenance and instrument *inspections, documen-tation, and furnishing the latest procedures, drawings, documents, specifications and inspection instructions for their work. The inspections are performed by individuals who do not. report directly to the immediate supervisor who is responsible for the work being inspected (Ref. 1, Par. 2.10.2). The Maintenance or Instrument Engineer ~elects inspectors from maintenance or 1nstrument personnel knowledgeable in the area they will inspect and from Technical Staff, Operations Analysis Department or contractor personnel certified in nondestructive examination. Descr~be the measures used for source selection and evaluation, and list the organizational components involved.

'\ The Inventory Control Group in the Generating Stations Depart-ment verifies that Spare parts, material and equipment is ordered from the original equipment supplier or an evaluated alternate supplier on the approved Bidders List maintained by the PurQhasing Department (Ref. 1, Par. 2.4).

12. Describe measures that assure adequate inspection and audit of the source and identify responsibility for source audit and inspection. *

(Se~ Engirteerihg - Construction Section)

13. Describe measures for qualifying pr~cedures, equipment and personnel for special processes.

Special processes for modifications and maintenance and the personnel performing such processes, are qualified .in accordance with the requirements established in the design specifications. Station maintenance personnel and contractors prepare welding procedures which are approved by the Mechanical and Structural Engineering Department. Nondestructive testing procedures pre-pared by the station are approved by qualified personnel in the Operational Analysis Department. Nondestructive testing pro-cedures prepared by contractors for modifications are approved by Mechanical and Structural Engiheering,Department. The Pro-duction - Maintenance mechanical engineer assembles and maintains the approved Commonwealth Edison procedures used by station maintenance personnel (Ref. 1, Par. ~-9). *

14. Describe measures assuring that adequate test and inspection equipment is available at the site and is within calibration prior to performing an inspection operation.

The statiog Instrument and Maintenance Engineers develop a master list of portable test and measurement equipment tb be calibrated and used iri their work. The System Operational Analysis Engineer has the responsibility to maintain the accuracy within necessary limits of the portable meas~riDg and test equip-ment used in activities affecting quality. The System Operational Analysis Department personnel periodically calibrates and adjusts this equipment (Ref. 1, Par. 2.12).

15. Des~ribe measures used to analyze nonconformances for quality trends and to report the results to responsible management.

When deviation from the accepted normal operation of the react6r or associated equipment occurs, or when a reactor scram occurs, an investigation is made and a report issued by the Technlc.:al Staff. The report do6uments the deviation and provides a record from which to establish a trend in the operation. The report. contains such information as the date, time and nature of the deviation (e.g. process difficulty, equipment inadequacy, pro-cedure inadequacy), its cause, the hazard or potential hazard to operation and recommendations for corrective action (Ref. 1, Par. 2. 15. 2. 2) . * **

16. Describe those measures which assure that purchase documents for spare or replacement parts of safety-related structures, systems

   . and components are .reviewed for adequacy of quality requirements by qualified personnel knowledgeable irr ~uality Assurance. The review is to determine similarity, compatibility, and inclusion of the quality assurance requirements and acceptance criteria of the original design.
   *The procurement documents are reviewed and processed by the Inventory.Control Group, of the Superintendent of Production -

Maintenance Department . . The Inventory Control Group includes the engine~ring, *quality assurance and documentation require-ments from the ~ngineering specifications for spare parts, material and equipment in the pro~urement documents (Ref. 1, Par. 2. 4).

17. Describe those measures which assu~e that adequate receiving inspection is performed on purchased material and equipment to determine its acceptance to design and purchase order requirements.

Receiving inspection is performed by the Storekeeper. This inspection includes:

1. Visual insp~~tion for damage.

2. Review bf Shipping papers with purchase orders ~o verify receipt of items and required documentation.

3. Verification that items received.are identified and meet the purchase order requirements.

Equipment inspectiohs are ~erformed by the Technical Staff Super-visor for items received by the Stor~keepe~ as necessary. Material certifications, test reports and radiographs are accepted by .the* Techn~cal Staff Supervisor with assistance from .t~e Maintenance Engineer, Instrument Engineer and nondestructive examination personnel (Ref. 1, Par. 2.10).

18. Describe those measur~s which assure that inspe6tions are per-formed by 4ualified personnel using documented inspection instruc-tions and properly calibrated equip~ent.

• The station Maintenance or Instrument Engineer or the assigned organization select~ qualified per~onnel to perform inspections using the latest station or contractor procedures, drawings, docu-
• ments, specifi6ations and inspection requirements and properly calibrated equipment. The inspections are performed by individuals who do not report directly to the immediate supervisor who is responsible for the work being inspected (Ref. 1, Pars. 2.10 and

2. 12).

Describe those measures which assure that investigations are conducted and documented to determine the validity of previous inspect.ions or tests when measuring and test equipment are found to be out of calibration.

. \ A nonconformance report is prepared for portable station test equipment found out of calibration. The preparatioh of this report requires appropriate investigation and includes determining the validity of previous inspectionB .or tests ..

20. Clarify if records are maintained which indicate the complete status of all items under the calibration system.

The System Operational Analysis Engineer maintains records traceable to the portable test and measurement ~quipment showing the date of last calibration, the calibration data and the due date of the next calibration. In addition the company has undertaken a microfilming program for the station records. Two microfilm copies of the records are being made to provide a permanent working set of microfilm records at the station and an.archive set of microfilm records at another location. Radio~raphic film is stored in a fire protected building located within the station security boundry on an ele-vation not ~usceptible to flooding. Storage is in a controlled environment to pr~vent deterioration of the radiographic film.

21. Describe or li~t the different audits performed, the areas covered, their expected frequency, the members of the audit teams and the distribution of the .audit reports.

Audits are conducted under the direction of the Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems and by the Station* superintendent as specified in the Technical Specifications of th~ Operating License. Reports of these audits and recommendation*s of cor-rective actions are documented and forwarded to the management of the organization audited. Station audit reports are also sent to the Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems for review. . The Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems reports violations of the Technical Specifications and the Operating License to those position of corporate management that have responsibility for nuclear activities. ( Reference 1: Quality Assurance Program answer to question 1.5 of the Zion Final Safety Analysis Reporti Dkt. Nos. 50-295 and 50-304. Reference 2: Application For Conversion.From Provisional Operatirtg Lic~nse To Full-Term Operating License, Section 3.2, Dkt 50-327, dated March 16, 1973. Reference 3: Application For Conversion From Provisional Operating License To Full-Term Operating License, ~mendment 1 (Response to AEC question dated December 20, 1973), dated February 11, 1974.

' ., SECTION II Answers to AEC Questions For Dresden 2 Concerning Quatity Assurance Program for Operations Pertaining. to Engineering, Construction and Modifications

• Pages Section

1. and 2 1 6 2 2 1 (ref. to Att. 1 Q.R. 1.0) 2 and 3 1 1 ' 1 (OPERATION ONLY) 2*

6 (OPERATION ONLY) 7 3 13 and 14 10 8, 9, and 10 4 13 and 14 10 21 18 10 5 17 and 18 12 12 and 13 9 17 12 14 19 '15

    '15 16                              (OPERATION.Of'JLY) 11                                7 17

Answers to AEC Questions For Dresden 2 Concerning Quality Assurance Program for Operations

• Pertaining to Engineering, Construction and Modifications Questions Pages Section 18 12 and 13 9 17 12 19 17 12 20 17 12 21 21 18

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Commonwealth Edison Co. This document presents and summarizes the quality assurance program to be employed in the design, procurement, construction, modification, .and pre-service testing of safety-related systems, structures, and components for the Station. The program, as set forth in Attachment 1, is intended to be in conformance with 10CFR50,* Appendix B. The program may undergo minor modifi.cations according to approved procedures without changes to the SAR. Up-to-date programs will be available at the

• respective corporate offices for review and audit. The following discussion summarizes the quality assurance program covering engineering, construction and modifications for the Nuclear Generating Stations of Common~ealth Edison Company, E

February 18, 1974 (Rev. 1)

... .~ QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN,<CONSTRUCTION AND MODIFICATIONS 1 _., Organization .. A. Basic Organizational Responsibilities Co~monwealth Edison Company _____ Commonwealth Edi~~n Company is ultimately responsible for the assurance of quality in all phases of the design, procurement, COt\7 structionJmodifications, and pre-ser,_;.ice' testipg.of the Station. Edisom executes this responsibility in accordance with the program set

               ;1       forth in Attachment 1 and further assigns areas of ultimate respon-sibility to specific Edison organizations and individuals. as de-scribed in that attachment. Edison has delegated the responsibility for certain phases of the work to Sargent & Lundy and the NSSS supplier, both/of whom act as Edison's agents in the assigned areas. As
                     *discussed in Attachment 1, Edison maintains overall*control of the efforts of these organizations by various mechanisms such as
                     ,design evaluation and audits. Edison has prime responsibility for controlling the* quality of on-site work by field contractors.

The Manager of Quality As5urance directs the quality assurance ac:tivities for the design, procurement, and construction of the company's nuclear power'facilities and has been delegated responsibility.. and authority to stop unsati*sfactory work or stop further processing of unsatisfactory material during design engineering and cons.truction of the plant :.t."'ld design engineering and construction for plant modification. If conditions which are afve:rse to quality and which require prompt action are found by .*

                     '-QUality personnel at the site and required corrective.measures
                   .       t             '                                   .

• Cflll not be agreed upon, the Manager of. Quality Assurance will be

                  .-/ '                                                        .       .         .

notified promptly. , The Quality Assurance Administrator reports

• to the.Manager of Qu::ility Assurance and has the. responsibility for administering quality assura~ce activities.

~- . The qualification requirements for the position of Manager l

                                                             --1

. -* .~ of Quality Assurance :,includes having a broad background and workinp; :F".nowledge of nuclear plant engineering, construction, and operating activities within Commonwealth Edison Company as well as functional interfaces with.working organizations outside the company plus having ~xecutive capabilities to achieve goals an4 objectives in consent with company policies.* Educational re-quirements include as a minimum a baccalaureate degree in an

       . en~ineering or* equivalent technical discipline.

Job requirements for the position of Quality Assurance. Administrator (Engineering and Construction) includes havin~ a broad background and workinf knowled~e of engineering, con-s~ruction, and operating activities within Commonwealth Edison

       . Company as well as having a knowledge of codes* and.standqrds

• applicable to power plant design a~d construction and quality assurance principles. The Quality Assurance Administrator also shall have.supervisor and manaf!ement qualities and capabilities.

Educational requirements shall include a baccalaurea.te degree or equivale!"lt in engineering or an equivalent technical discipline. The Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance Program .

            ..                                                                   l for Nuclear Generating
                       .         . Stations and O.R~ 1.0 Figure.1-0 and 1-2.
        *in AttacQ.ment 1 cover the organization arrangement whereby the *site Station Construction Department and the Quality Assurance t

Department are separate organizations. The Site Project Engineer supported by Field Engineers is responsible.for verification that construc'tion activities carried out by site contractors conform j to procurement document requirements.* The procurement

      ~ocuments include Performance and quality related functions.

The Quality Assurance.grouu is responsible to assure that the quality **;e*quiremerits. are* fulfiiled 'by-Construction. Independent inspection agency activities performed directly for Commonwealth Edison are under the responsibility of the Quality Assurance Supervisor or Coordinator. and such agency has responsibility to identify unaccepta'Qle

                                                *2

   - or* nonconforming work'~ The independent testing agencies are
     . assigned responsibilities for inspection and testing, to determine and report whether the item conforms to design, test and specification requirements, and to reject unsatisfactory materials, equipment, and other.items. Such rejection by the independent
     . "testing agency will* be the b.asis for* action by the Common-weal th Edison site organizations to .car~y .out necessary st.eps to assure repair, rework, or processing o:f a nonconformance report in accordance with th_e Quality Assurance Program.

I Further.discussion of the .Edison organization is found in

     . Quality Requirement No. 1-0 b.f Attachment 1.

Sargent & Lundy Sargent & Lundy is responsible for the mechanical, struc-tural, and electrical design of the plant_ and for.the quality of that des-ign (except for _those portions of that design included within. the scope of the nuclear steam supply system (NSSS°). In this context," :Sargent & Lundy performs an independent.evaluation. of vendor proposals, designs, quality assurance programs, test reports, and design reports. Sargent & Lundy further performs an independent evaluation of the NSSS design. Sargent &. Ltindy .* is responsible .for the document di~tribution for all phases of the job.

                -~* Organizational Responsibilities for Major Operations Design Control of design quality is essentially a four-stage process. Designs originated by either the NSSS supplier or Sargent &
   ."*Lundy are subjected to internal review by the designer and an independent internal party (or parties). The NS.SS supplier and Sargent & Lundy designs are evaluated by each other as well as by personnel from one or more Edison departments *. These four steps constitute the primary design evaluation for all safety-3

(

                               *-:/

related: items in the Station. Appropriate document distribution and control has been established to permit an effective effort in this area. Comments an designs resulting .from these evalua-tions are presented in letter form, by telephone (with,written follow-up), or in meetings with published minutes. Edison has final authority with respect to decision making o_n designs. Procurement Procurement control and follow-up for NSSS components is established and maintained by "tthe NSSS supplier. Edison and Sargent & Lundy evaluate the NSSS s~pplier procurement sp_ecif ications and

                  'Edison audits and inspects the.NSSS supplier*control measures.
      ~ ...          Procurement of and follow-up on non-NSSS components and services
                   ,are directly controlled by Edison, based on 'sargent & Lundy spec- .

ifications which have been evaluated by Edison. ,*Sargent & Lundy is used to assist in this effort, as Edison's agent, as re-quested by Edison. Construction Construction quality assurance is an Edison respon-sibility. Edison exercises managerial control of all site activities and specifically the site Quality Assurance Group maintains close surveillance of on-site contractors*. and qualiti assurf:inCe activities. The NSSS supplier furnishes technical and Quality Control assistance for on-site activities relating to the NSSS. On-site contractors' quality assurance progr~ms are independently evaluated by Sargent & Lundy. 1-------- Pre-service Testin~ Pre-service testing, consisting of pre---operation8l arid

                  *startup testin~, is controlled by Edison.

Sargent & Lundy and

                 .:..*.the NSSS supplier _furnish rough *draft test procedures to Edison. Based
            .... ~n these, a final draft is written by Edison. This final dreft.

4

is subjected*to internal Edison evaluation and to evaluation by Sargent & Lundy or the NSSS supplier as appropriate. The tests are managed and performed by Edison with technical assistance from the NSSS supplier as appropriate. The evaluation of the test results is performed by Edison and confirmed by independent internal Edison evaluations. Further -independent

*evaluations .by Sargent & Lundy or the NSSS supplier are performed as required by-Edison.

summary ii)' ' It should be noted that several levels of evaluation exists for all phases of the quality assurance effort. The specific details regarding each-aspect discussed previously are found in Attachment 1. 2 Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear Generating Stations Program.Description The classification of_ structures, systems, and components . designated

   ,.        as Safety Related is defined in the Commonwealth Edison Q~ality Assurance Manual fo~ Nuclear Generating Stations.

Attachment I to this chapter presents the Introductory and Policy Description (Quality Requirements) of the Manual. This description takes the form of addressing each of the 18 criteria ~n 10CFR50 ~nd the added intent of co~plying with ANSI N45.2 and applicable Regulatory Guides and sections to the Grey Book "Guidance on Quality Assurance R~quirements During Design and Procurement Phase of Nuclear Power Plants" (see attached Quality Requirement index and Quality Requirement Cross 5

                                                                                                                          ~    j  * '

Reference)* As explained in the Introduct;ion to** Attachment 1 , these requirements will be implemented by means of detailed

               .. quality pror.edures (see attached quality procedures index) delineating the specific methodology to be ~sed. These quality procedures compose the remaining part of the Quality Assurance.

Manual. for Nu.clear Ge~erating Stations. .  !

         )~-*-.*      -* .....  **             . -- . - . ~**:.     --;..: -*******---:**- - **--**-*     -~-  ..-----:.... ,-_-::::_-----:-*-.--*-.-=~==----,,-fl---:---*-- - .

The responsibility :for coordinating the.review I. *and approval of revised Quality Requirements and.Procedures is esta.blished in Quality Requirement 2.0, .'Attachment *1,. During revision of a Quality Procedure the draft*

  -*---procedure, including proposed revisions, shall be distributed for comments to all personnel whose responsibilities .may be involved.                            -*- ..      - -* -                                        _ _ . *-*

Further details on revisfons of Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures may be found in Quality Procedure No. 2-1 *

                                                                                                      --- . - *---~--    ...

I: *Training

        ,                           Indoctrination and training of personnel* performi,ng                                                       .                    .

• activities involving quality assurance will '.include general training, speciai. .

triiining programs, such*as- welding, nondestructive . examinat-ions ~* etc., internal and external to the Company and cin-the-job training, such* as inspections, testing, auditing, etc., as required. .. The Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear Generating Stations provides that suitable proficiency is developed and maintained through retraining for activities involving quality assurance work. I I Further details on training may be.found in Quality Procedure ( Q. P. )- No._ 2-2 in the Quality Assurance Manual for .

• Nuclear Generating Stations.

6

                      . 3H  Design c*ontrol -

The preliminary vehicle for design control involves multi-level review: and/or evaluation of design documents by independent groups. The design documents include but are not limited to system flow diagrams, equipment specifications,. proc.ess speci-fications, design criteria, and equipment drawings.* Design calculations are also subject to two or more levels of evaluation or review including that performed by the originator. These reviews or evaluations-are *conducted by the NSS supp~~er on interface and nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) scope designs; by Sargent & Lundy on Sargent & Lundy and NSSS designs; and by F.dison on all designs. The Edison Mechanical and. Structural and* Station Electrical Engineering Departments have responsibility

              '-:for Edison design review effort with input from other Edison departments a.s .appropriate.

These design evaluations or reviews include consideration of quality standards, quality assurance requirements, materials suitability, process suitability, interface control, and suit-ability of analytical or testing requirements as appropriate.

            .~~Edison- will assure that design requirements including re~latory_

requirements, codes, and standards will be utilized in the development of specifications, drawings, procedures arid

               *instructions*

Design changes are controlled throilgh document revisions

              ~resulting from design change requests and/or design change notices and are reviewed and evaluated in the same way as the basic de-sign docurrients. Site desi~n change requests will be reviewed
             . ;by the Site'Quality .Assurance Supervisor or Coordinator, CECo
                .Engineering Department Personnel, and/or the Architect Engineer as applicable and will be approved by the C~o Engineering Depart-7

ment after which ;the anuroved change

                                                                                                           ~--

will be subrni tted to the " Architect Engiriee~ for in6brporation ~nd distribution~ Further detail~ on*design and design ch 3 nge_control

                    *may be found in Attachment 1 , Qu<3.li ty Requirement No. 3. 0; and Quality Procedure No's. 3-1, 3-2 and 3-51.                                                                         -~ .
                        .**** .* . 4            Procure~ent                  Document Control

• The:.JJT<:;*c,Urement.. documents generally consist of equipment-

              *., specifications or ser;vices specifications, each of which are re~ ..
                       '\'"iewed or evaluated*. as previously disbussed i.n , Section _3 for*                                                          o:
            . r:       design and.,.cons-tr:uction and. .

design. . ...

                                                                                                             .and construction for rnodif ication's 0
          ; ._ * :*Chan_ges to procur_ernent .documents are handled in**a similar fashion.;

Actual contract or* purchase order documents are reviewed by the

• Nsss suppl.ier *for' ~s*ss
• ftems a:nd *oy Edis oh* and Sargent & tundy
• '. * *fo;.** non~Ns'ss j_tems to insure *that all requirerrients. h.ave been

                  * *.iriGorporated.sp.ecifically.or                                          by reference~                          .. '
                     * ,.~I             '                           *  .-::~         '
                                        *.*. *R.e'c'or.tj.s pertaining to the . review and evaluation of
                     .Procurement documents \<rill include, in whole or in: part,
 ..                  minutes of meetings, comment letters, design review records, .
                    *project quality assurance aud-i ts and. a copy_ of the original des.igi1_ .

document marked with comments or latest revis'ions ** These records will_ be kept in vendor files and/ or applicable CECo department * " f.iles during the* Engineering, Construction and Operating phases of the generati.ng stati9n.

                                              "Prior to si.lbmi ttal. of the engineering proposal request to      the Edison General Purchasing Agent:;.                                  .

the* Project. or. General.

        .I           Design.Engineer prepares _a suggested list of prospective bidders .

for*. each specification using input from the.Architect* Engineer and the cognizant Purchasing. Department* Buyer.~ .. This list is established u,sing such factors as past experience, experience of other utilities,

ii l e or specific qualification surveys (either desk or field surveys are

        ***-used.)              The final list of prospective bidders as well as the person agreeing to the list are indicated on the Mechani9al Building
         . *Proposal Request (MBPR) ~r Electrical Proposal Request (EPR) approved by the responsible Engineering Department Head or his designee.
                 '.fhe persons agreeing to the list are .. key. representatives of the Engineering Departments, Station Construction Department, Oper~ting Department, Purchasing Department, and, when requested, the Architect Engineer.

Upon_ completion* of the evaluation of the proposals

              ..submitted by those on the approved bidders list, the responsible roj_ect or General Design Engineer shall have prepared and
             *transmitted--to the Purchasing Department a letter of recommendation and a purchase requisition. The purchase requisition will incorporate, A ._.

by*reference, those documents such as specifications, drawings,

              ]>roposals, supplementary proposals, etc., which form the basis
               !or the evaluation and award. Edison Purchasing, based on the
              'Y-ecommendation letter, its own evaluation and purchase requisition,
                     .I               .                 .                   .

shall ' conduct necessary negotiations and clarifications and make; the award. -***- \

                                                                                . **--=- .. _..
                                *Prior to final award of the contract or purchase order~
       . . the cognizant CECo Engineering Department He:1d will assign
          . . authority for         .   . .

evaluation of the

                                                            . contractor quality assurance p*ro-

gram to the Project or General Design Engineer who will be assisted Supervisor or Coordinator also will review and concur with the cognizant CECo Engineering Department evaluation results. As I

               ~art of the contractor quality assurance P!ogram evaluation, Edis.on
                                                          *9

Quality Assurance. will assure ~11 contractor quality assurance e* program evaluation deficiencies are resolved. !f the contractor program deficiencies are minor and/or may be corrected by specific procedures for the work to be dc:me, the resolution may follow an

          *award and will be. a condition of _the award.

Further details on procurement document control are

                    -presented in Attachment 1, Quality Requirement No. 4.0; a:~d * - *;
                     *Q._uali ty Proceci\lres 3-1, ... 4-1, and**4 ... 2.
                             ,5    Instr~ons,       Procedures, and DrawinP-'s

• 1, .Activities affecting quality are required by the Edison quality,program to be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or *drawings. Procurement documents and the corporate

             . quality assurance programs of Edison, the NSSS supplier~ and**
             . Sarg~nt & Lundy reflec_t this requiremeni_;. Quality Procedure,; 5.:.1 in* the Edison Quality Assurance Manual for Nuclear Generating Stations
               .establishes     .
                                        "the method for review, evaluation,. acce*ptance, and
               .distribution of contractor qu~lity instructions and procedures including spe_cial process procedures *
                  .J               Further details are presented ln Attachment 1 ,

• Quality

i. '. -Jiequireinent No. 5. o; :and Q\.,\ali ty Proceditre * .:s.;..1 .* * . . ..

                             ,6   'Document Control The fundamental.control vehicies for documentation re-lating to Safety Category I systems, structures,* and components I*.
            ~-are a project distribution list and periodic docum~nt. status
            **reports. Sargent & Lundy acts as the general distribution agency
                ~or project documents (except for internal Edison quality assurance procedures) and carries out the distribution in accor-d.ance with a* list furnished by Edison .for specific types of * . t
                 . I 10

( l

• documents. Both Sargent & Lundy and the NSSS supplier* publish p6riodic stat~s report~ identifyin~ those docu~cnts.cufrently in force.

           'These reports are di~tributcd to all involved parties. ERch
            *document recipient is responsible for insurins that only the latest authorized documents are in use ~nd-that void documents are so identified. Periodic inspections and audits are employed as a final check to ~ss~r~ "that the latest authorized documents are in use. Typical do~uments subject t9 distribution control are, design specifications, seismic reports, contractor Quality Control procedures and others that are included on the sample distribution
           *list attached to Q.P. 6-1.

Further details on document control are presented in Attachment 1, Quality Requirement No. 6.0; and Quality Procedure

                ,6-1.

7 Control of Purchased Material¥ Equipment and Services

       .I' Both Edison and the NSSS supplier have direct procuremerit
               *f'unctions for the Station. Sargent & Lundy offers recommendations to Edison.on.vendor selection and reviews vendor efforts as

~--****-** ""*

               .directed by Edison. Edison will inspect and audit the NSSS supplier control of purchased material, eq)-lipment, and services. Edison
               .has the responsibility fo~ on-site controis of Edison and the NSSS
                 $upplier.*purchased material, equipment, and services.

Incoming material and equipment ~ill be inspected by Edison or its agent to assure physical integrity and documentation compliance with procurement docu~ent requirements followed by review and sign,,-off of appropriate Edison a. A. Report Forms

        *I      by Edison Construction and Q .A: personnel as applicable.
                                  ,~

11

The details of the measures employed for such control are present in Attachment 1, Quality Requirement No. 7.0; Quality Procedures 7-1, 7-2, 7-3, 18-1, and 18-2. 8 Identification anJ Control of MateriaJs, Parts, and Components Materials, parts,.* components, and equipment will be

     . identified by stamps, labels, tags, or other suitable means unique to the specific item. Records pertaining to an item will be traceable to the item through the identification.

Items which ar~ not correct or are defective ~ill be appropriately labeled and .controlled to preclude usage. The NSS$ supplie~ and other suppliers to Edison *are responsible for .this identification* and are subject to audit and inspection by Edison in this regard~ .. I The details of the measures employed Sor identification and control are presented in Attachment 1, Quality Requirement 8.0; and Quality Procedure 8-1 *

           *~   Control *of Snecial Processes Special processes are generally controlled in a three-stage effort consisting of personnel qualification, procedure.

qualification (and/or. approval) and implementation, and lastly,. inspection or evaluation of the process results.. *Recognized

    , codes or standards a~e used where applicable *. Vendors are required to have approved controls in force as ~ppropriate to the processes being employed for a specific task. The application of the~e controls is assured through audit/surveillance activities by Edison or its agents at vendor plants and/or the site~ The 12

Edison site Supervisor of Quality Assurance or Quality Assurance Coordinator is responsible for assuring that records of qualified personnel ar~ maintained by the Contractor fo~ work performed for Edison. Further details on special process control and current lists of special p~ocesses are presented in Attachment 1, Quality Requirement No. 9.q~ and.Quality Procedure 9-1. j . 10 Inspection Under the inspection pro~ram conducted by Edison for purchased materials an inspection and test plan will be prepared for each purchased item based on specified requirements and the specific fabrication techniques and sequences to be used for that

            *item. Approval of such a plan and approval. as to the quality require~ent$ being satisfied is the responsi~ility of the Quality Assurance Supervisor or Coordinator. Inspections may take the form of source. inspection, receiving inspection, or both, depending
                                                                      ~   .

on the nature, importance, and quantity of the item(s) procured. Inspections will be performed to approved written procedures or check lists for final inspections. Procurement documents shall: contain provisions for Edison's right of access to vendors' andL subvendors' facilities and records for source inspection and audit *

                              . 1he NSSS supplier will conduct inspe~tions on ~terns pro-cured under the NSSS contract. This does not preclude E~ison inspections ~I~.          - those same ite=s.                   ~       ~. *
~ *, .          ,  ..
                 -    J ... *  *  *
                  .              The. Edison Site Supervisor of Qualitv Assurance or Qu_al.i ty Assurance Coordinator will assure tha~. surveillance of contractors a-:tivities is performed in accorda~ca with sur-veillance procedures and checklists. InspectiC"::'l notification I

points. as.established ~y Edison will be witne~sed by Edison or 13

_its designat~d agent. The applicable Ediscn site Supervisor of Quality Assurance or Quality Assurance Coor~inator will assure that required inspection of contract it~~s is carried out and that contractor test procedures approved by Edison or the

      *Architect Engineer are judiciously implemented. In preparing an inspection notification point witnessing plan, Edison will take into account applicable codes, standards, specifications, and contractor quality control procedures. The plan will also identify, fo~ example, the parameters to b~ checked, accept/reject criteria, equipment needed for the inspection or contractor

___ documentation to be reviewed.

,. .F\irther details* of" the *1nspection programs are found in

      . :Attachment 1 ~.Quality Requirement.No. 10.0; *and Quality .Pro-cedure No' s 7-f, 7-2, 7-3, 10-1 , 18-2 * :*

11 Test Control The test program will consist essentially *of four testing stages:

a. Vendor proof testing - This testing consists* 6f source testing such as hydrostatic testing, seismic testing, performance testing, and environ-mental testing as appropriate er.ad as reflected in

                          --the specific procurement documents for a given item or items. Approved writt~n procedur~s will be required for ~hese tests and the test results.
                          --will be evaluated. For items procuied under the

• NSSS contract, the NSSS supplie~ will act *as Edisort's

        .*                    agent in this regard* subject to inspection.and audit by Edison or its designated agent.- For non-NSSS items, Sargent & Lundy will participate with Edison or act as Edison's agent in this re-
                           .. gard.

14

Construction testing - This testing consists of* on-site component testing such as hydrostatic testing, pressure proof testine, pump and valve actuation to verify proper installation, and electrical continuity verificetion. Written

                    *procedures or.check lists will be employed and
        *'.          the status of equipment qoth before and after
                     .testing will be documented. jhe various on-site service contractors will generally perform these
                    .tests. Control and management bf the tests is the responsibility of the Edison St2tion Construction
            '.'    *Department Project Engineer. The Supervisor o~

Duality Assurance -0r Quality Assurance *Coordinator will be responsible for assurin~ that adequate calibrated equipment is utilized, that equipment is properly r~leased for testing, that d~ta

                  .documentation is in compliance with procedures

---* and that retention control of test nata documentation is adequate. _____ - c. Pre-operational testing .- This testing consists of

l. ~yste~ performance tests prior to (o~ in some cas~s, after) core loading and are performed on completed

                  .ot essentially completed systems. Two basic          * *.

categories of tests exist. The first of the~e in-cludes formal pre-operational tests which are per-formed on critical Safety - Related *equipment and .:

                 *which are controlled by approved written procedures

• and are evaluated in accordance with the Edison

                .*Quality Assurance Program. 'The Site Quality

Assurance Supervisor or Coordinator will perform 15

                                    *a final re~iew of all Equipment Releases to assure
                               * *.. that all comments and exceptions have been resolved
                                    .and will sign the release for equipment turnover

• to operations.

For those systems whose functioning (other than as 8 pressure boundary) is not critical to safety, testing is not controlled in.accordance with the

                                  . Edison program. However, wri tte:i procedures or check lists are developed Rnd the test results are evaluated for these systems.

A complete list of these test~, by categor~, is included in Section 14.1 of the SAR, pre...:operational "testing is performed by_ the contractor.-~ Edison* station operating persoJnel. . ~* r

d.

• Startup testing - -startup

                                                         ,     . . testin& consists of th.ose
                                *.:Single and multi-system tests occurring after fuel loading which are intended to de~onstrate over~ll plant performance. These tests include the 10\.1-power physics tests and the po'i.*er escalation testing
                                 . program. Those tests essential. to demonstration of.* safe operation will be conducted under a program having the same requirements as .the formal pre-.

operational tests. Non-safety related testing,. if performed, will be controlled in.a manner similar

                                 *.to component demonstratio!1 test. --~-complete list _________ *--*---- .

of these tests is included in Section 14.1 of the SAR. Startup tests will be performed by station operating personnel. 16

               ~1 ii
                .;  .         Further details regarding test control are presented in Attachment
               !i      .

1, Quality Requirement No. 11.0; and Q~Ality r~ocedure . I No's. 11-1 and 11~2

• 12 Control of Measurinf.Y and Test Equir.*~

Calibration of measuring and test quipment used at the

                 ;site will be performed off-site by the Edis.on Operational Analysis i
             . ,Department. Both the Operational Analysis Department and the applicable construction site shall maintain necessary calibration records.                                                                                      ....~.-*:
                            ------:----.... .--~- - .. -****        ***-   **--**--~_-:-:.:=~~_:_:..*._

The basic control measures employed for.measuring and test equipment consist of periodic calibraticn using appropriate standards and documented procedures. The control includes documentation and recording of calibrations, tagging or equivalent methods to.* show calibration status, and when necessary, written procedures for the use of the equipment. For each piece of test and measurement equipment, the date of last calibration, the. calibration data, and the due date of next calibration shall accompany ~he piece of equipment at the time of calibration and shall

                   '     remain . with the equipment until the next      .

calibration. These items shall be identified by use of tags or stickers. . will investigate the consequences of previous uses of test and Edison

     *--~-'-- -*                                                           .                              . ... -- -
         ; measurement equipment and take corrective action if calibration by the System Operational Analysis Department. shows the accuracy of 1any equipment to be outside the specified accuracy limit. *Suppliers and contractors to Edison are required to have and employ similar
        ' ' appropriate control measures which Edison will assure through I

surveillance,, audit and approval of contractor pro~edures. Th~*detalls of the control'prof,ram are presented in

          *. Attachment 1, Quality Requirement No. 12. 0; * -~mci Quality Procedure No's. 12-1 and 12-2~ :

J 17

  *                 .... 13

• Handling, Storage 2* and Sh1pping The primary vehicles for controlling, handling, storage,

         .** and shipping of i terns are approved written instructions or procedures.

which: delineate acceptable techniques and necessary qualifications and

              ~recautions.- A storage location plan*pr6vided by on-site con~

tractors isireviewed* and approved by the Station Construction Field Engineer for each site utilizing information provided by the applicable Engineering Department Project or General Design Engineer .and.Contractor. Inspections and audits by Edison or its

              &,gents are us.ed to verify compliance wJ. th the plan or pro*cedures.

Further details pertaining to the control program are presented in Attachment .1, Quality Requirement N6. 13.0; ~nd Qu~lity Procedure No~ 13-1; .. 14 Inspection, Tes.lz_and Operat'ing Status The measures used to indicate the status of items are

             'especially broken down into two phases. The fii*st phase is pre-receipt controls used to insure that all ..requisite tests and inspections SCheduled. to be performed at a vendor IS Sh Op haVe been made *. The controls applied to this .chase consist of vendor,
                                                                                         ' \

progress reports, inspection notification points, and quality release* documents which accompany the item to the site. The second phas.e consists o.f on-site. controls and i_dentif ication of status. These.controls consist of documented.receipt inspections

              ;afid i tern tagging to indicate n-onconfo:rming and test status.

I Application and removal o.f identifying tags wili be conducted by t4ison Site Field Engineers whereby the Edison Site _Quality. A~surance.Supervisor or Coordinator will assure tha1:; these actions through revie._._; and sign-off are documented on the Edison Material Receiving Rep6rt Form 7-1.1. Edison, assisted as required by the Nsss

• sµpplier- and Sa:rgent & Luridy, 'is responsible for* control and ~

,__ *e*., material status. ~----* - - -.. 18

                                                                                          \

Further details on these measures are presented :in Attachment 1, Quality Requirement No. 14.0; and Qu~lity Procedures ,_: 7-1. and 14-1. 15 Nonconforming Materials, Parts, or Components The measures employed at the site during design and

            \
              ' construction.and design and construction for modification to con-
               *trol nonconforming items consist of tagging or other discrete
               *marking, segregation, and documented evaluations and resolutions of the nonconformance. The measures emplqyed in *a supplier's shop vary, but are subject to the approval of the NSSS supplier for NSSS items and of Edison for non-NSSS items. Contractor nonconformances will be docume~ted.by each contractor as described in his approved Quality Assurance Program and Procedures. Disposition of Nonconfor~
              'mances reportable to Edison or discovered by Edison, shall be e*       reviewed and resolved by Edison personnel within the Engineering, Construction, and/or Quality Assurance Departments as applicable
               *using NCR form Q.P. 15-1.1.                                           **~

Further details regarding these measures are presented l in Attachment 1, Quality Requirement No. 15.0; and Q~ality Prqcedure

           *,No. 15-1.

16 Corrective Action Corrective action measures are included in the design,

• - .. *source fabrication, and on-site construction and erection phases

          *,pf the project. Corrective action measures during design are des-cribed in Section 3. Correc*tive action measures in the ,

• source fabrication phase of the project are included in the quality assurance programs of individual vendors, including the NSSS supplier, augmented by Edison efforts as described in 19

li sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 15. On-site*corrective action measures con~ist of a program for recording Rnd reporting nonconfor-mances, classifying nonconformances, detailing the appropri.ate 1 corporate level of resolu_tion for given classes of noncon~ormances, evaluating corrective actions for effectiveness, and controlling_ 1

           *corrective actions by surveillance and evaluation. Implementatic:i.
        *of corrective action will be accomplished at the source of the deficiency by appropriate personnel as directed by cognizant .

Edison engineers. For corrective action of nonconformances the Edison Site Quality Assurance Supervisor or Coordinator will

                                                          ~

establish and maintain a Nonconformance Report (NCR) Station

  ..       Log to monitor the resolution and closing of all NCR's

• The-details of corrective action measures are presented in Attachment 1, Quality Requirement No. 16.0; *and Quality Procedures

-- 15-1, and 16-1. 17 Qu~litv Assurance Records Quality assurance records will .be maintained either by Edison or by an agent of Edison, under Edison's control. The

          *location, means of identification, duration of retention, and
         . means of re~rieval will vary. depending on the nature of the individual records.
     '               Quality Assurance records will be stored in a predetermined location as necessary to meet the *requiremerits of applicable     j standards, codes and regulatory agencies. T'ne storage location
     * ~r facili tY: shall be adequate for the maintenance, preservation and protection of the Quality Assurance record files from the time
        ~f receipt until their ultimate disposal.

I Further details are presented in Attachment 1, Quality Requirement No. 17.0, and Quality Procedure 17.1. 20

.. "', f . 18 Audits Audits will be performed by Edison and/or its contractors,

                   .subcontractors, and suppliers to verify the overall compliance with, end effectiyeness of, quality programs* in eff 1:?ct for the project.

The number and experience of persons participating in audits will vary according to the nature and significance of the audit. l . Audi ts will pe planned using a checklist and will be conducted in accordance with a schedule as applicable to evaluate compliance with* all aspects of the Quality Assurance Program. On-site audits will be performed on a regular monthly basis while off-site audits will be performed on a rando::i frequency based. on the nature and safety significance of the wo:*k being performed. An audit report shall involve the preparation of an .e. *audit report package consisting of a Summary Sheet,,*Attachment Sheet, Checklists and any additional pertinent details recorded on additional sheets necessary to support .a finding(s). The audit report package will be sent to the Vice.President of Engineer1ng, Vice President of Construction, Manager of Station Construction, the respective heads of the: Engineering Departments, Manager of Quality Assurance and the Quality Assurance Administr~tor for man.agemeht review and action as required. l **----. Also) periodic reports on quality assurance activities

                 *are submitted to the Manager of Quality*Assurance by the Supervisors and Coordinators. In addition, written summary reports of such
                  *activities are submitted to top management. Such reports, in part, provide bases for to~ management reviews and discussions of quality assurance activities and status.

21

    <, '( -

Descri~tions of the Audit systems are represented in Attachment 1~ Quality Requirement No. 18.0, and Quality Procedure 18-1, and 1.8-2. 22

ATTACHMENT 1 INDEX

      - PREFACE
     .- INTRODUCTION
      - DEFINITIONS
      - A. S. M. E. INTERFACE
      - QUALITY REQUIREMENTS INDEX
      - QUALITY REQUIREMENTS 1.0 - 18.0
      - 10CFR50 APPENDIX B
      - QUALITY PROCEDURES INDEX

           "'\.":.
 ...  ~~.,..i:./ ~

1_, .. '-y: ATTACHMENT I QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIONS 1833

QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL This Quality Assurance Manual has been prepared to delineate the requirements and procedures governing the Commonwealth Edison Company quality management plan for nuclear generating stations. Implementation.of the plan Quality Requirements with Quality Procedures provides a degree of quality assurance commensurate with the intent of applicable codes, Atomic Energy Commission requirements, and Federal Regulations governing design, procure-ment, construction, testing, operation, refueling, maintenance, repair, and modification of nuclear power generating facilities. The execution of the quality management plan will assure Common-wealth Edison Company that the plant is built to requirements and with the reliability necessary to safeguard the general public and Company employee. The scope of this manual covers the total quality management plan for the life of Commonwealth Edison Company nuclear generating plants commencing with the LaSalle County Station. The quality assurance plans covering the Dresden, Quad-Cities, and Zion plants e for design, construction, testing, and start-up are contained in the following documents: Dresden 2/3 FSAR Quad-Cities 1/2 FSAR Zion Quality Assurance Manual

                              . yer Chairman and Pres Commonwealth Edison December 13, 1973   (Rev. 1)

Com-mrnl.. QUALITY e Edi.an Company A88U ..ANCE MANUAL INTRODUCTION This Quality Assurance Manual contains the plan governing the Commonwealth Edison Company (CECo) quality assurance program relative to its nuclear power generating facilities. The Manual consists of two parts. The first part includes the requirements developed as the Commonwealth Edison Company quality management plan. The second part. inc.ludes Engineering and Construction and Oper;:itions procedures .~developed to implement the quality management plan. The purpose of the Quality Assurance M~nµal is to standardize quality requirements and procedures and otherwise identify methods of quality control. The design, organization, and contents of this manual are intended to comply with the followin~ documents:

a. Apperidix B to 10CFR50 Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Plants" (AEC regulation covering licensing of production and utilization facilities).

b. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (Section III).

c. ANSI N45.2 - Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants.

d. ANSI N18.7 - Administrative Controls for Nuclear Power Plants.

The procedures in the Quality Assurance Manual will be supplemented by additional instructions which will be developed and documented by individual departments, eAch Generating Station 8nd Construction Site as the need arises and be controlled by Quality Assurance Administration. For each Station, these will be developed in specific areas such as operation, maintenance and repair which ere peculiar to that Station. The individual Station Maintenance and Operations Procedures Manuals will be developed for this purpose. The application of the 18 Criteria of Appendix B to 10CFR50 FIS outlined in this manual is in accordance with their interpretaticn as understood by Commonwealth Edison Company. ChanGes or modifi-cations to these interpretations will be reflected in revisions to the Manual Requirements or Quality Procedures. Revisions tc this manual will be made in accordance with a Quality Procedure. The contents of this Quality Assurance Manual apply to safety-related material, components, equipment, systems, and structures (i.e., those that prevent or mitigate the consequences of postulated accidents that could cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public) as defined in each Station's SAR(s).

                            ~

Commonwnlth

• Niian c-pany QUALITY A88U ..ANCI! MANUAL They also apply to those systems, components, parts, and r~aterials that are desie;ned, fabricated and erected, tested and inspected in accordance with the AS~E Boiler and Pressure VesseJ Code.

NOTE: A description of the Quality Assurance Manual and how it complies with the requirements of the ASr-~E Boiler anc Pressur*" Vessel Code Se:~tion III Quality Assurance Requirements is given herein under the section entitled "AS~*~E Code InterfacE-." (end) December 1 , *1973 ( F~ev. 1 \

Commoownltb QUALITY e Edi.a ASSURANCE MANUAL c_,..,. DEFINITIONS Audit. Periodio evaluation of the performance of an organi-zation *s errorta which affect quality or the conformance ot items to drawings and specifications. Auditor. One authorized to exa~ine quality assurance practices and verify whether requirements are being met. Balance of Plant. Generating Station items and equipment not designed, furnished or installed as a part of the Nuclear Steam Supply System. (Class B and Class r.) . Biel package. The total of clrawings, specifications, codes, standards, quality and other requirements that describes the task on which a prospective contractor/supplier will bid. Calibration. A method of assuring accuracy of gages artd instruments used for measuring and testing by comparing with recognized standards. Certificate or Compliance. A document properly signed and dated attesting to the fact that certain activities were performed, results were achieved, conditions existed, or criteria were satisfied. Certified personnel. 11c~rsonncl who have passed a formal training program and a formal proficiency test for special processes such as welding, plating and nondestructive testing. Certified standards. Standards of measurement whose accuracy can be traced to standards at the National Bureau of Standards. Characteristic. Any property or attribute of an item, process, or service that is distinct, describable, and measurable, as conforming or nonconforming to specified quality requirements. Quality characteristics are generally identified in specifications and drawings which describe the item, pr6cess or service. Code. A recognized standard for using or processing materials, or for ~skill involved in use or processing. Cogni;;,ant Engineer. The engineer assigned a specific task or area of responsibility in the design or testing of a component or system. Component. A part, ass8mbly, or combination of parts and assemblies mounted together to perform a design function. Component Identification Number. An identification number assigned (where appropriate) to an item for use throughout its iifetime. Construction. Activities at the building site necessary to erect, inspect and accept a power generating station and its associated installation. DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev. ) 6 PAGE..2._ OF_

Commonwealth

• F.dlson Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL Construction Tests. Those tests necessary to verify that the installation of each component of a system is complete and complies with the applicable specifications, standards, codes, drawings, and engineering informatton.

Contract (1nolud1ng puroba1e order). A binding agreement between two or more persona or companies. Contractor. Any organi?.ation or individual(s) under contract to perform work, furnish items or services for Commonwealth Edison Co. It includes the terms Vendor & .Supplier. Control point. In a sequential operation, a checkpoint at which certain data are taken, inspections made or approvals required. Corrective action. ~limination of the cause of discrepancy or non-conformity in a product or process. Design controls. Methorts for assuring that basic design re-quirements are formalized and translated into design documents with proper review to assure the scheduled release of a valid design. Design requirements. Documents that set the functional require-ments, operating conditions, safety requirements, performance objective!>, design margins, and cl2sign life. Included are any special requirements for size, weight, ruggedness, materials, fabrications or construction, testing, maintenance, operating environments, safety margins, and derating factors. Design criteria. Statements of the form, function, and interface requirements within well defined limitations. Design review. An analysis of design with respect to technical adequacy, interface control, inspectability, maintainability, and conformance to applicable codes, standards, regulations,and design criteria. Desk survey. An evaluation of a supplier's quality control capability made from documented procedures and records of past per-formance. Deviation. A nonconformance. Departure cif a characteristic from specified requirements. Documentation. Any written or pictorial information describing, defining, specifying, reporting, or certifying activities, requirements, procedures or results. Drawing manifest. A document for transmitting drawings, released for construction to Engineering, Construction, a.nd Production. DATE 12/1 /73

Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL l'.:quipmcnt.  !\. combination of items of material. in either sub-assembly or complete form. Erector. An organ:L?.ation involved. in assembling and building equipment or structures at the site. Fabricator. /\11 org.-1nL~ation involved in the manufacture of material or equipment. Final ~)afety Analy:3 l::; l~c"rrnrt. ( r;~AH) A. finalization of the preliminary ::;afcty analy::;i::; rc~port prepared for the U.S. Atomic

~nergy Commisuion prior to isnuance of an operating license.

First level dc;~;igri rcv:L0w. A review conducted by the responsible project engineer within the de:..;ign agency for a specific design .Hsc iplinc. Plow cl1art.  !\. reprc!Jentation of the sequence of activities such as procurement, fabrication, processing, assembly, inspection and test, or the sequence of inrtividual operations within one or more of those functions. Incident. Occurrence of major damage, serious personal injury or significant schedule rlPlay. Inspection. The proces~~ of measuring, Pxam1n1ng, testing, gaging, or otherwise comparing a product with stated requirements. Inspection and test plan. A listing, with optimum sequencing, of all the inspcctiow3 and test:~ required to be performed for a specific item, component, structure or service. Interface control. Con:;idcration that components and structures are geometrically and functionally compatible and that materials are compatible with both procr:::;::; and c:nvironment. Item. Any levr~l of unit u.:,;scmbly, including structure, system, Gub:;ystcm, subassembly, component, part or material. Mate: rial. Items u:;r::d to create other items: includes raw materials and single fabricated items. National :;tanilarcl:;. ::;ystems, instruments and materials standards maintain('CT at or issued by the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) or

• other de~;ignated institutions, and the values for natural physical constants and conversion factors recommendc:d by the NBS.

J:>A!F 12I1 /73 (Rev. ) el;(if 3 Of 6

8

 /

Commonwealth F.dl- Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL 9 Nonconformancc. A dr.ficir.ncy in characteristic, documentation, or procedure which renders the quality of an item unacceptable or indet_crminate. Examples of nonconformance inclurl.e: physical defr.ct~, test failures, incorrect or inwlr.quate documentation, and deviation or variation from prescriberl. procr.s~ing, inspection or test procedures. Nuc lcar l"~evir.w Board. f\. Commonweal th Eilis on Co. group cstablist1ed to assist Company management in assuring that nuclear ccncrating facilities ure operated and maintained in compliance with AEC license rcquircmentu. Nuc lcar :~t0am ~iupp ly :*.y :; tc*m. ( N:~:;;',) That portion of the nuclear gcrwrn.t Lng plant which provLc1*~:.; :;tc.'.1.m from nuclear heat. It includes reactor, :L ts control ~;y::.;tr.m:*;, ma:i.n coolant and steam generation systems, fuel handling cr1u.lpmcnt, r'mr~rg<:ncy core~ cooling system and other safe-guards, a;,sociatcd electrical equipment,tnstrumentation, spent fuel hl'lndltng,and radioa.ct:ive w::i.stP di.sposal system. Objective J~viclcncc. f\.ny statement of fact, information, or record, e :L the r quanti ta ti VP. or qualitative, pertaining to the quality of an item or service basRd on ob:~ervations, mcast1rcmt:nts, or tests which can be ve ri fir.d. Operational Teets. Teets that are performed during the operations or the plan to verify continued satisfactory performance ~ or safety related structures, systems, and components. Preliminary ~~afr.ty fu1aly:h;i_:; l<cport. ( P.C)AR) ThP initial detailed safety evaluation preparer! for th0. lJ .:.; . Atomic Energy Commission prior to 1~-:.::;uance of the site construction perm-Lt anrl. which delineates design, normal and cmc:: re;ency opr. ration, potc~ntial ace idents and prerl ictcrl. conscquc:ncc:; of such ace Jdents, an<l the means proposed to prevent such acc:Lcfonts and/or rcduc0 tlte.ir cons0qucnces to acceptance levels. Preoperational Testin~. Preliminary testing prior to fuel loading and plant operatlono assure that construction and instal-lation are complete and to verify design and function of systems. 1*'roccdm*r.. f\. 1loc1uncr1tr:d .Ln:;tn1ction wtlicll has a general step l.>y step format. Propric~tary fie:.; i11;n:;. h':;ign:; rnginr~crcd, *produced and sold by a manufacturrr in* accorrlcu1c<~ 1:Ji.tl1 l1L~ critr.ria and warranty. Purcha:;r: w~qul :~Lt Lun. 'l'ri<~ ha:; :Le doc:.; umcnt describing a material, componr'nt or :;r~ rvice 1'o r whjc 11 a '1.Lsc re te p roe urcmc~nt action is necessary. Quality A:~:;uranc<'. Planned or systc~matic actions necessary to provide adequate: confidence t~i.J.t an item of a facility will perform satisfactorily in service. DATE 12/1/73 (Rev. ) PAGE~ OF_§_ .

\ Cmumomrealth QUALITY e Edison Company ASSURANCE MANUAL Quality ('.ontrol. Qunlit.v :1ssurance :1cUons which provide a

  ~cans   to control and measure the ch.1,racterjstics of an item, process, or f~ciltty to establjshed requirements.

Repair. The process of restorjng a nonconforming characteristic to a c-ondJtion such that tr1P. cn.pabilit,v of an jtem to function reliably and safely is unimpaired, even though that jtem still may deviate from an orjgjnnl requirement. Request f!Jr hjd. Invitntjon to bid on a specific task made to suppliers or contractors for materials, goods and s~rvices. Rework - The process by which a nonconforming item is made to conform to a prior specified requirement hy completion, remachining, reassembling or other means. Second level design revjew. Independent objective assessment of a design by qualified personnel who have no direct project responsibility for the design. Source Rcceptance. /\cceptance of a product by Commonweal th Edison co. or jts designated ar;ent at the supplier's plant, prior to shipment. Source inspection. Inspection carried out at Vendor plant prior to sh j pmen t of pure hased j terns. Special process. A process that js certified and controlled. Specifications. Stntements of the properties that an item should possess to be satjsfactor.v to the buyer. Such properties are: material, size, physical and chemical properties, methods of manufacture, finish, jnspections and tests to be applied, and method of packing for shipment. Start-up Tests. Tests that are performed after initial fuel loading and proceed through several power level plateaus to l°°" power. St:1tion Eeview Hoard. !\ group of people appointed within the Station personnel in accordnncP with the Technical Specificatjon to review and approve all (:ompany and ~)tati.on orders, procedures, tests, experiments, modifications, abnormal occurrencesi plant operation, and special investjgations.

• Surveill::mce. l~xami.nation of supplier's manufacturing, inspection and test operations, and of records of work in progress.

Technical Review. A determination as to whether a nonconforming item wlll be accepted "as is," reworked, repaired to an acceptable condition, or rejected . Technical Specification. The design and performance criteria and operating limits and principles of an operating license to be observed during initial fuel loading, critical testing, start-up, power operations, refueling, and maintenance operations. DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev. ) PAGE~ OF_6_

Commonwealth

• FAlkoa c-pany QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL Test. Determination of the physical and functional properties of item~

Test plan. An outline, narrative description, or flow diagram indicating the tests to be performed, the methorts to be used and the points in the process where they are to be executed. May be a test procedure.

• Variation. A nonconformancP.. Departure of a characteristic from specified requirements.

Waiver. An exception to established controls or adoption of special procedures in lieu of controls. Work instructions. Instructions to personnel performing work on specific areas such as controls and identification of materials and equipment during fabrication or installation. Workmanship. That quality of an item expressing its skillful and artful manufacture, without apparent blemishes. DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev. )~~OF~

                    """""-e.ltll

• I'..._ Campoy QUALITY AaSUftANCI! MANUAL ASME CODE HiTF.:HFl'J".:E The folJ ow inc L> ri descriptJon of how th:i_:; r,!:-H:d;! l complies 1,;i th thP. rer;uirernf~nts of ASME Boiler and Pressure VesseJ Code (Section I I I). .

1.0 GENERAL (NA-4210) CECo's overall Quality Assurance program is designed to accommodate the encineering and construction llh8ses of a nuclear power plant ancl sul;sequently the operational ma_intenance and modificetion pha~es of the program. CECo first developed this quality rr.anual to respond to the requirements of the Federal Register 10CFR50, Appendix B. The manual is divided into two parts \*ti th the first part titled, "Ouali ty Hequire-ments," and the second part titled, "Quality Procedures." The Quality Requirements portion of the manual contains CECo's policies for Quality Assurance and the Quality Proce-dures portion contains detail procedures for implementation of the policies. The Quality Procedures are uniquely numbered to differentiate between those that are applic2ble to Engineering and Construction activities and tho~e that apply in Operations activities. In each section, Envineerinf and Construction procedures end with a -1 through -50 suffix while the Operations procedures end with -51 through -100 suffix. The Quality Procedures are automatically invoked by the Quality Requirements (i.e., Q.R. 5.1 invokes all Section 5 Quality Procedures). This "ASME Code Interface" is provided to specifically explain CECo implementation and compliance with the latest applicable Quality Assurance requirements of the ASME Code Section III Article NA-4000. Figure I and II arc attached to show the relationships between this manual, AS~E Code, ANSI N45.2 and 10CFR50, Appendix B. Figure III is attached to show the document tree utilized within CECo to assure that the quality requirements have been translated into detailed procedures that are implemented at the working level within each station. 1.1 Statement of Authority The Statement of Authority of the quality assurance organizations of CECo is contained in the preface of this manual.

\ The quality assurance organizations of CECo are emr-.. 2red to assure compl.i;:ince with the q11al i ty requ i rement'.'i, not only of ASME Code, but also those of the Federal Govern-ment and the various nationnl standards that are applied to an owner's program of quality assurance in nuclear power. Quality Assurance authority within CECo for the engineering and construction phases of a nuclear power plant is vested

     ~vi i::;h Lhe Manager of Quality As.surance and. sul1sequently to the Quc:i.li ty Assurance Administrator. *Quality Assurance authority for operations is vested with the Man~ger of Production and subsequently the Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems.

1.2 Responsibility Responsibility for implementation of quality assurance requirements rests with the Manager of Quality Assurance and the Manager of Production. Sectio~ 1.0 of the quality requirements further defines and assigns responsi-bilities within CECo. Since CECo relies heavily in engineering and construction upon the utilization of an architect engineer (AE), nuclear steam supply system suppliers (NSSS), suppliers and subcontractors to each, Quality Assurance is a line group assigned as an audit function. CECo contrr:icts with suppliers who are qualified in accordance with the applicable section of the ASME Code and who have the appropriate Code authorizations. Audits are performed by CECo to verify the performance of the architect engineers and nuclear steam supply system suppliers and their subcontractors. In operations and maintenance, the Superintendent of Nuclerlr and Fossil Systems utilizes the Quality Assurance Administrator's (Production) Office for the monitorine of day-to-day operations and the governing of the maintenance and modification of nuclear generating station facilities in accordance with those codes and standards to which the facility was originally constructed, or the latest edition of the codes and standards, depen-dent upon the age of the faciJity and the design require-ments. This organization also audits the performance of the station Quality Assurance groups which are a part of the station technical staffs.

\

1.3 Organization Charts The overall and detailed organizati~n charts describing CECo's organization are contained in Section 1.0 of the Quality Requirements portion of this manual. The basis Quality Assurance organizational structure within CECo is a combination of staff and line functions. The engineering portion of the organization is a line organi-zati 0n intimately and directly involved with the day-to-day construction and engir1eerinc activities rass8ciated with nuclear fa6ility construction. Operational Quality Assurance is both staff and line with a station Quality Assurance group which performs quality control functions and is part of the station line organization. The performance and compliance of each station to quality assurance requirements is assured through audits administered by the Quality Assurance Administrator. 1.4 Policy Statement The basic policy statement concerning CECo's Quality Assurance program is contained in ttiis quality assurance manual. Overall policy, includes not only compliance with ASME Section III Article NA-4000 for items contracted for after July 1, 1971, but also the requirements contained in the federal regulations 10CFR50, Appendix B, ANSI Standard N45.2 and ANSI N18.7. Put together, all of these standards comprise the CECo quality assurance program requirements which, in all cases, is equal to or exceeds those require-ments contained in ASME Section III, Arcticle NA-4000. 2.0 DRAWING AND SPECIFICATION CONTROL (NA-4410 and NA-4430) Drawing and specification control is maintained by CECo to assure that only the latest approved drawinf,s and specifications are utilized in the procurement, fabrication, construction, maintenance and modification of nuclear power plant facilities. Basic control lists are maintained in an integrated system within CECo and also with their subcontractors. 2.1 Production, Maintenance and Distribution The overall production, maintenance 8nd distribution of of drawing~, standards, and specifications, are split bet~een the design and construction phases of the project and the maintenance/modification phases of the project *

\ Normally, CECo contracts with a qualified architect engineering firm to provide design drawings, standards and specifications for initial construction of the power plant. Augmenting this basic contract is another contract with the nuclear steam supply system supplier who produces drawings, engineering standards, and speci-fications for those portions of the plant for which he is responsible. For maintenance and modification, if the.work to be performed is major in nature, a qualified architect engineer may produce the drawings, engineering standards and specifications required and submit them for review and approval by CECo. In those instances where the maintenance or modification work is minimal or very minor in nature, CECo may elect to produce the required drawines, standards and specific3tions and/or perform the physical work involved. In these instances, design work, reviews and Professional Engineer (PE) Certification, if required, may be accomplished by CECo's architect engineer. The applicable Authorized Inspection Agency is advised of the ASME design change in accordance with Section 6 of the Quality Procedures. The basic review structure, details of review and distribution by CECo are contained within Sections 3.0 and 6.0 of the Quality Procedures portion of this manual. 2.2 Drawing Revision Control CECo assures control of revision to drawings produced by its architect engineer or nuclear steam supply system supplier by requiring submission, for documented review and comment, of all changes or revisions to the originally approved desien drawin~s. With respect to maintenance or modifications of systems, structures, or components, the design revisions are submitted to the respective electrical or mechanical engineering sections of station operations for review and ~pproval prior to release. Design change evaluation is carried out in accordance with Section 3.0 of the Quality Procedures. Periodically, updated listing of the revisions in both phases of the program are issued in accordance with Section 6.0 of the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures portions of this manual.

\ 2.3 8p~cifications and Engineering Standard Revisions C~~crol Ci'.:C..:o assures control of revisions to specificn tions a.nd engineering standards utilized on their nuclear power projects in accord~nce with those controls described in Sections 3.0 and C.O of the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures portion of this manual. When the revision involves this manual, the Authorized Inspecti9n Ar,ency is advised of the chanee by means of a review copy for their information. Transmittal of the revision is accomplished in accordance with Section 2.0 of this manual. 3.0 PROCUREMENT CONTROL (NA-4440 and NA-4442) Procurement document control in the design and construction phases of .power plant construction by CECo is exercised by the architect engineer or the nuclear steam supply system supplier in the specifications prepared by them to comply with the rules and regulations of ASME Section III as well. as other regulatory codes and standards requirements. With repard to the operational phase, either an architect engineer's control i::; exerted and/or CECo' s own internal control is exerted, dependent upon the assignment of the responsibility by CECo. In those instances of CECo' :; control, requirements of ASM~ Section III, CJ.ass 1, 2, 3 or MC, as applicable, are directly lr1cluded in the procurement documents. In the instances of the utilization of an architect engineer, the requirements of ASME Section III regulations, codes and standards are imposed upon the architect engineer by CECo and subsequently assured by the Engineering Quality Audit function. 3.1 Procurement Basic procurement control as exercised by CECo, is described in Sections 4.0 and 1.0 of the Quality Require-ments and Quality Procedures portions of this manual. Overall, the engineering and construction portions of procurement are operated in such a manner that the architect en~ineer is required to submit the designs, specifications and standRrds to be utilized in procure-ment to CECo for review and approval. Subsequent to approval of procurement documents by CECo, the actual purchasinf is performed by CECo. The NSSS supplier performs the procurement, subject to CECo audit.

1 n~; pr::c ti on dur i. n:'. th1, course or proct1 remc*n t i ~; as dc'->cribcd .in J><:ir;wrarh ::i.3 below. Jn tho~>{? c:1scs when~ the desir:n ;incJ ~pecific.::i.tion:.; :ire prov.ided to CE.:Co Purchasirw, review 3nd approval i ~; C1 s described in ~ections 4.0 and 7.0 of both the Quality Require-ments and Quality Procedures portion of this manual. 5.2 Source of Purchase Requisitions Approval L)uriiw the ent,ineerinr; and construction phase of a project, purchase requests are prepared by CECo Enrineer and include a procurement package supplied by the architect en~ineer to CECo. Subsequent to review and approval. by CECo, such requisitions are issued first as a request for proposal and subsequently, after evaluation, as a purch~se order upon Award of cur.tract. ASME requiremfJnts pertaining to Section I II, Class 1, 2, 3 or MC, as applicable, are included as part of such purchase packa~es. Wher1 a project is instituted by CECO internally for the maintenance or modification of an existing power plant, procurement requirements are normally initiated by the Station Technical Staff and processed ns described in Section 4.0 of the Quality Procedures. In those instances where an architect engineer is retained to rwndle the rnodificr:tion, review nnd approval of requisi-tions is as described for the engineerin~ and construc-tion phase. Handling of purchase orders is as described in Sections 4.0 and 7.0 of the Quality Requirements and OuAlity Procedures portion of this manual. 3.3 Source Inspection Source inspection activities are carried out by CECo in accordance with Sectioris 7 .O c:inrl 10.0 of the Quality Requirements and Qual.ity Procedures portion of this manual. Source inspection will be performed by CECo personnel or CECo's agent on components procured to the requirements of ASME Section III, Classes 1, 2, 3 or MC, in accordance with preplanned inspection instruc-tions and checklists. The SHme type of checklist and instruction will be utilized when procurement and subse-quent source inspection is required for maintenance or ~edification activities on the part of CECo. Where source inspection is required, instructions and proce-dures governing the activities of CECo quality assurance

or specialist personnel are provided in accordance with

           ~ecti~n 7.0 of the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures portion of this manual. Source inspection activities are also performed by the AE and the NSSS Supµlier as directed by CECo. CECo audits these
           ~ctivities to assure compliance with desiGn require-ments.

7 ' j **. ~ l~2ceiving inspection is performed at the receiving plant

           <)n  ASF!~ '.)ection III equipment ordered by CECo.       In those C8.:*J:s involvin;   er.r;irieerinp.; and construction, such inspec-tion may be conducted by Construction Contr~ctors, as audited ty CSCo, or by CECo's own personnel. Receiving inspection of in-coming materials governed by ASME
           ~ection III, for maintenance and modification activities, is audited by the Station Quality Assurance personnel in accordance with Sections 7.0 and 10.0 of the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures portion of this manual.

5. '; Vendor Qual if i c_ation - Approved Vendor List An approved vendor list is generated in accordance with Section 4.0 of the Quality Procedures. Subsequent low performance, or continued nonperformance on the part of a vendor on the approved list may result in his removal from th.'1t list.

3.G Deficient or Nonconforming Material CECo control~ deficient or nonconforming materials or items produced by a su~plier in accordance with Section 15.0 of' the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures portion of this manual. Corrective action, as dictated by the type and severity of the nonconformance, is governed by Section 16.0 of the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures portion of this manual. CECo or their agent, verifies that deficient and nonconforming material has been replaced, repaired and dispositioned as necessary to assure compliance with applicable specifications, codes, standards and federal regulations.

4. 0 PHOCE~;s CONTROL ( NA-4450)

Prnces!::. control is excrcj_:;ed by CECo in those r.ictivi ties involvin~ ASME Section III. In the construction phases, this process control is specified as part of CECo's contract with their AE, NSSS Supplier or involved subcontractors. The requirements for travelers, checklists and production order systems, are incl11ded jn the contractor's procurement documents to their subcontractors. The overall details of this control in the construction phases are included in Sections 9.0, 10.0, 11.0 An:i 1 5.0 of the Quality Requirements and Quality Proce-aures portion of this manual. The controls exerted, ~hen proce~;.~-. control must be achieved "in-house" by CECo, are oeRcribed in Paragraphs 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 below. 4.1 Traveler Or Process Control System CECo utilizes maintenance procedures to control modifi-catiGns accomplished by CECo personnel. The details of preparation, reviews, approvals and Authorized Inspector participation are contained in Sections 9.0, 10.0, 11.0 and 13.0 of this man~al and in the individual

                 ~enera*tinp station operating procedures.

~ 4.2 Checkli~t System The checklists used by CECo to govern their application of special processes are prepared, approved and distri-buted in accordance with the CECo Special Process Proce-dures Manual which is at each generating station. 4.3 Production Order System Since CECo does not perform manufacturing production, a production order system is not utilized. Rather, when modification to a plant is required, a detailed project schedule is developed by the individual station and subsequently the work is authorized by use of a work request as described in the Operations Quality Procedures of Section 3.0.

5. 0 V*IELiJ:l t G QUALITY ASSUHANCE ( NB-4 300, NA-5252 and NA-5253)

Welding quality assurance, as practiced by CECo or their agent is a controlled, certified process which assures thRt the welding processes are properly qualified in accordance with Section.III and IX of the ASHE Code, and that the welders involved are also properly qualified and certified in

accordance with Section IX. In the construction phase, welding quality assurance is specified as part of CECo's contract with their AE, NSSS Supplier or involved contractors and control is maintained by CECo surveillance and audit. For modification or repair, when CECo is performing the work, the following applies: 5.1 Welding Material. Control The welding material control system is as outlined in Sections 9.0 and 10.0 of the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures portion of this manual. The details of storage, issuance and use are contained in the individual generating station operating procedures. 5.2 Qualification of Welders CECo qualifies their welders in accordance with the CECo Special Process Procedures manual. 5.3 System of Production Checks The system of production checks utilized by CECo is contained in the individual generating station operating procedures.

• 6.0 NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION (NB-5000 - APPENDIX IX)

CECo performs nondestructive examinations in accordance with Sections 9.0 and 14.0 of the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures portion of this manual. When a contractor is involved, CECo uses Sections 9.0 and 14.0 as a basis for audit of their system. The details governing qualification of personnel and procedures, NDE status and equipment quali-fication are contained in the CECo Special Process Procedures Manual. 7 .O QUALIFIC/\TIOl'; OF GUAGES AND MEASURIHG EQUIPMENT (NA4600 and NA4630) The CECo system for maintaining qualification of guages and measuring equipment is stated in Section 12.0 of the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures portion of this manual. Calibration of guages and measuring equipment is performed utilizing known standards which are traceable to National Standards.

e.o ~!EAT TREATING (NA-5263 and NB-4600) CECo'~ heat treating processes are controlled Rnd est:iblishcd in accordance with Section 9.0.of the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures sections of this manual. Heat treatinr, operations performed by or under the cognizance of CECo are performed in a controlled and documented manner to assure that the equipment proce~ses and personnel are properly qualified and that the appropriate process parameters are monitored and recorded. 8.1 Description of System Used Local post-weld heat treating is the only heat treatment oper~tion performed by CECo. Other heat treating is performed by a qualified contractor using a system that has been reviewed by CECo, or its agent, prior to use. 8.2 Record System CECo or their agent audits th~ record system of a contractor performing heat treat operations in conjunc-tion with a nuclear fabrication or modification project. Items checked are: the heat treat furnace record, the heat chart (including whether it is completely filled in and signed as required), personnel and furnace qualifications and calibration. 8.3 Calibration of Furnaces Since CECo does not maintain any heat treating furnaces, the determination that calibration has been accomplished by the subcontractors is verified by audit. 9.0 DOCUMENTATION (NA-4430, NA-4442.2, NA~4452 and NA-4530) The CECo system of documentation is covered in Sections 6.0, 11.0 and 17.0 of the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures sections of this manual. 9.1 System of Acquirin~ Final Documentation In those instances where CECo performs an ASME Section III modification, completion of a complete set of the completed procedures, certification data, NDE results, etc., that were required to fabricate and install the

items specified in the modification is the responsiJility of the Technical Staff Supervisor. This set of documents is trrtnsmitted to the Station Office Supervisor after acceptance by the Authorized Inspector for retention in the station files for the life of the plant. When CECo has contracted for the fabrication, modification or repair, the ASMS qualified contractor is respon~ible for the final documentation. Upon completion of the required testing, the complete documentation package is submitted to CECo Technical Staff Supervision. Upon completion of review and acceptance, the package is forwarded to the station Office Supervisor for retention. 9.2 Checklist of Final Documents For each contract, or major Code activity, a checklist of final documents required including the appropriate Data Report is prepared by the contractor or CECo Technical Staff, as applicable. This checklist shall include the requirements of ASME Section III and appli-cable specifications, drawings, production travelers, maintenance procedures, etc. The checklist shall provide for the review and concurrence of the Authorized Inspector. 9.3 Submittal of Data Reports Before the component or appurtenance is placed in service, copies of the appropriate ASME data reports are filed with the enforcement authorities having jurisdiction at the location of each installation. The data reports indicate those cases where modifications have been performed to an existing system or component versus a completely new installation. 10.0 AUTHORIZED INSPECTOR CECo maintains a valid, continuing agreement with an ASME Authorized Inspection Agency at those times which involve Section III nuclear work. At the present time, this av,ency is Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company. 10.1 Relationship In-Plant The Authorized Inspector's primary contact is with the station Superintendent, with access to the station

(..)uali ty Assurance. Engineer. The Authorized Inspec'lcr shall have free access to CECo station facilities at as provided in NA-5120 of ASME Section III. He shall be provided ample time to insert his hold points in the ~aintenance procedures relating to Section III or Section XJ Code work and has authority to place any item on hold if the Code is being violated. The Authorized Inspector will notify the Station Superinten-dent and/or Technical Staff Supervisor of any such problem. 10.2 Documents Available to the Authorized Inspector The Authorized Inspector shall be afforded full access to any procedures, specifications, drawings and design specifications involved in ASViE Code work. 10.3 Choosine of Hold Points The Authorized Inspector shall be kept up-to-date on all maintenance procedures involving ASME Code modifi-cations, and is supplied a review copy by the Technical Staff Supervisor when the procedures are in the rough draft staee. The Authorized Inspector is then afforded the opportunity to enter his hold points. \lfhen the final draft of the procedure has been typed, the Technical Staff Supervisor assures that the Authorized Inspector's hold points have been properly included. 10.4 NDE and the Authorized Inspector Nondestructive examination detailed procedures are available for review by the Authorized Inspector prior to their use in ASME Code work. Nondestructive examina-tion personnel files are open to the Authorized Inspector upon request. He may require requalification of either procedures or personnel if reason exists to doubt the validity of test results. 10.5 Checklist of Final Documents and Data Reports When the final document check list and data reports have been prepared as required in 9.2 above, the entire package shall be made available to the Authorized Inspector. When the Authorized Inspector is satisfied that the work is qualified to be stamped, he shall certify the data report by signature.

10.G Additional Records Additional record~:; requin~d by Uw Author izcd Inspector to assure Code compliance will be supplied by C~Co uµon request. 11.0 NONCONFORMANCES CORRECTIVE ACTION (NA-4800) The CECo system for rionconformance reporting and subsequent corrective action is described in* Sections 15.0 and 16.0 of the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures portion of this manual. Detailed actions at the individual genernting station are described in the individual generating station operating procedures. 12.0 AUDIT (NA-4700) The CECo audit system is described in Section 18.0 of the Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures portions of this manual. 12.1 Description of Audit System CECo and their agents maintain a comprehensive audit system for engineering, construction and operations activities. System and product audits are performed and include the following areas: *

a. Systems Audits - such as audits of engineering, construction and operaticns quality systems including methods, procedures, instructions, tests, examinations, records and practices established to control and verify activities that affect the system effectiveness.

b. Product Audits - assess the effectiveness of inspecticns and tests that are specific to the fabrication, installation, construction, testing and operation of an it~m.

Audits are scheduled or conducted ~s required, and follow-up action includin~ reaudit performed as necess8ry to assure that deficiencies or adverse conditions are corrected. Special audits related to specific quality problems or interface coordination problems are performed as required. The audit schedule is reviewed semi-annually as a minimum and is subject to change as required for effective administration of the Quality Assurance Audit Program.

13.0 FOJ<M~; The forms required for complete implementatiur1 of the <Jun] j ty Assur~nce system are included in each applicable section of either the Quality Procedures portion of this manual or the Special Process Procedures Manual. For convenience, the following is a listing of the forms utilized by CECo and their location in this manual. FORM TITLE Q.P. LOCATION Appendix A Quality Assurance Manual Revision Q.P. 2-1 Distribution Appendix B Procedure Format (Illustration for Q.P. 2-1 Engr./Constr.) Appendix C Review of New and Proposed Revisions C).P. 2-1 to Procedures 3-1 Design Control Records Q.P. 3-1 3-2.1 Design Change Notice Log Q.P. 3-2 3-2.2 Design Change Notice Q.P. 3-2 4-2 Evaluation of Contractor's Quality Q.P. 4-2 Assurance Program 7-1.1 Material and Equipment Receiving and Q.P. 7-1 Inspection Report 11-1.1 Release For Construction Testing Q.P. 11-1 11-2. 2 Station Construction Equipment Release Q. F. 11-2 Form 15-1.1 Nonconf ormance Report Q.P. 15-1 15-1.2 Nonconf ormance Report Status Log Q.P. 15-1 86-1075 Specific Trouble Report Q. p. 15-2 16-1.1 Telephone Memorandum Q. p. 16-1 18-1.1 Audit and Surveillance Checklist Q. p. 18-1 18-1.2 Audit and Surveillance-Summary Sheet Q. p. 18-1 18-1.3 Inspection Trip Report Q. p. 18-1

FIGURE I NA-4000 4100 ASME CODE INTRODUCTION ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION QR 1.0 PRODUCTION QH *1.0

                                                                                          ;> 5 I 4111 QA PROGR/\M           QR l.o & 2.0. Qr 2-1         ()H  I . 0 & i'. 0. Qf' 4112 INTERIM LETTER                    N/A                              NII\

4120 EVALUATION OF PROGRAM 4130 QA DEFINED INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 4140 DOCUMENTATION OF PROGRAM QR. 1. Q, -.5 . 0 QR 1.0, 5.0 & QP 5"'.~_1 4210 AUTHOR ITV AND RESPONSI~ILITY QR 1.0 QR 1. O_ 4220 QUALIFICATION OF PERSONNEL QR 9.0 QR 9.0 4221 PERSONNEL RECORDS QR 17.0 QR 17.0 & QP 17-51 4320 CATEGORIES OF RESPONSIBILITIES 4410 DESIGN CONTROL QR 3.0 & 6.0, QP 2-2, 3-1, 6-1 QR 3.0 & 6.0, QP 2-53, 3-51, 6."":.~J.. 4420 QC PROCEDURES 4430 DOCUMENT CONTROL QR 6.. P1~QP 6-1 QR.f.b &-QP 6.:.51 4441 MEASURES TO QR 4.0, 5.0, 7.0 & QR 4.0, 5.0, 7.0 & CONTROL PURCHASES QP 4-1, 4-2, 7-1, 10-1 QP 4-51 1 7-.~J 4442 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROLLS - QR a.o QR 8.0, QP 8-51, 8-52 4451 FABRICATION CONTROL QR 9 . 0 & 10 . 0 , QR 9.0 & 10.0, QP 9-1 QP 9-51, 10-51 4452 PROCESS CONTROL CHECK LISTS QR 10.0, QP 10-1 QR 10.0 &QP 10-51 4460 HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING QR 13. 0 &_ QP 13-1 QR 13. 0 & QP 13- 51 4510 EXAMINATIONS AND TESTS QR 10.0_& __QP..10"'.1 QR 10.0. .. & QP

                                                                                  . 10-51 .*.

4520 HOLD POINTS QR 10~0 & QP 10"'.l QR 10.0 & QP 10-51 4530 CHECK LlSTS - INSPECTION AND QR 10 . 0 , 11. 0 , QR 10. 0, 11 . 0, TESTS QP 10-1 , 11-1 QP 10-5.1 , 11-51 4540 EXAMINATION STATUS QR l 0 . 0, 14. 0 , QR nrJr~ 14. o. QP l 0-1 QP 14-51 4550 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS QR 15.0 & QR. rs.o, QP _15"'. l.. . QP 1~-51 4660 CALIBRATION REQUIREMENTS QR 12.0, QR 12.0, QP 12-51

• QP 12-1, 12-3 4700 AUDITS QR 18.0, QP 18-1, 18-2 QR fa.a~ QP 18-51 4800 CORRECTIVE ACTION QR 16.0 QR 16.0, QP 16-51 4910 RECORD MAINTENANCE BY OWNER QR 17.0 QR 17~0, QP 17-51 4920 MAINTENANCE ANO ACCESS TO RECORDS QR 17.0 QR 17.0, QP 17-51 4930 CONTENT OF RECORDS QR 17.0 QR 17.0, QP 17-51
• 4940 SUBMlnAL OF DATA REPORTS QR 19.0 December 1, 1973 QR 19.0

e Cu11MONWEAL TH EDISON QUALITY REQUIREMENTS 1.0 Organization

• ASME III NA-4100, 4111
• 4210 N 45.2 l . 0 and 3.0 n-r.0.1

• .i. l1 10 l.t°R 50 I

J.

                                                                                                                      ~

2.0 QA Program 4111

• 4120, 4140, 4320, 4420 2.0 II 3.0 Design Control 4410 4. 1
• 4.3, and 4.4 I II 4.0 Procurement Document Control 4441 5.0 IV 5.0 Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings 4441 -6.0 v 6.0 Document Control 4410, 4430 4.4 and 7.0 VI 7.0 Control of Purchased Material
• Equipment, and Services 4441 8.0 VII 8.0 Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, and Components 4441. 4442 9.0 VI II 9.0 Control of Special Processes 4220, 4451 10.0 IX 10.0 Inspection 4451, 4452, 4510, 4520, 4530, 4540 11.0 x 11.0 Test Control 4530 12.0 XI 12.0 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment 4600 13. 0 XII 13.0 Handling, Storage, and Shipping 446.0 14.0 XII I 14.0 Inspection, Test, and Operating Status 4540 15.0 XIV 15.0 Nonconforming Materials, Parts, or Components 4550 16.0 xv 16.0 Corrective Action 4800 17.0 XVI

17. 0 Quality Assurance Records 4221, 4910, 4920, 4930 18.0 XVII 18.0 Audits 4700 19.0 . XVIII 4940 - Not Coverea 4.3 - Not Covered Decembe~ 1 , 1973

FIGURE III ASME CODE - AEC REGULATIONS STANDARDS SECTION III ' CECO QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

           "     CECO QUALITY PROCEDURES INDIVIDUAL*                                    INDIVIDUAL

. STATION MANUALS STATION MANUALS QUAD CITIES FUTURE December 1, 197~

r*-:.~:. :... ~ *~.:* ~

       -i ....                             ..
               --**-***~r..--.-.-*.-~--.- *~---"-:~~-,~*ro.~ ... "."W'-t._. .. ,..~ ..,:,-~*....;..._...._~,.....**"'*~~*-1-.--------.-~---.---~ ... ,.-,,,.,------.._

! t ~ . "**-. QUALIT'! P.EQUIRE:*Si'-i1'S H~D.'..X L.~--------- EO .* TIT!.:~ 1.0 12-1-73 2.0 Qunlity Aanurance Program 12-1-73 Design Gon.troJ. 12--1-*73 4.0 Procura~ent Docu2ent Control 12-1-73 5.0 Instructiona, Proc~dures, and Dr~~ings 12-1-73 6.o Document Control 12-1-73 7 .o . 12-1 *-73

                  *s.o          T.n'.:k:-1 U.~*~;_ '.'.D. t:~on ?r:d c;,,:;n.t1:r):.. o"

E\~~:t~;:t~':.~ t~r~o;;J. COfii~~:*(;*1.:.:;':(itf~: 12-1-~7:5 9.o 12-1--73 ' 10.0 Inr.pect:';..Gn 11.0 12-1-73 12.0 Control* of. Measur:1ng* and Test Equip:~i~nt 12-1-73 13.0 12-1-73 12-*1-73 15.0 Nonccnforrni~g M~tcrialz, ?crtz, or Co~poncnts 12-1-T3 16.0 Corrective Action 12-1-73 17.0 Quality A::rnuranco Recc-rds 12-1-73 18.o Audit3 12-1-73

               - Att~chr:1ent           ~ Appendi:".".:           B, . J.OCFR-50,                   "Qu~l:tty A2.2*1/l.. <.lt1Ce Cr:t t*eria for* l~uc le~r Po*<<<<~!' Pl!:m t ~> '                                                            9-17 **71
                                                                                                                                                                   ~
                                                                                                   *)~-":
                                                                                                   '"*, ~i L- *--1,..

12.)_1 /*r-; * ( _,_<**"""'_......__ F',.ev. ;i) j f-'.*~. G: ~~;:~~

I I e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALITY REQUIREMENT

                                                                          . Q.R. NO. _ 1_._o___

1 *.1 GENERAL The Executive Vice President of Commonwealth Edison Company has overall responsibility for the Quality Assurance Program covering the design, construction and operation of the Company's nuclear generating stations. Authority and responsibility is assigned to the Manager of Quality Assurance for quality assurance with respect to design,,procurement and construction of these facilities. Authority and responsibility is assigned to the Manager of Production for quality assurance with respect to the operation of the Company's.nuclear* power stations.

   .                         The Vice President (Engineering); Manager of Quality                  '

Assurance; Vice President (Licensing and Construction);. "i General Division Manager; Vice President (Purchasing); and Manager of Production are responsible for implementation of the Quality Assurance Programs as described herein. The Vice President (Engineering) directs the activities of departments responsible for design, test,procedure, plant modif ~cations and the baseline data for future in-service inspection of Commo~wealth Edison Company nuclear power generating stations. The major departments and the person responsible for activities within each department are as follows: Mechanical & Structural Engineering Department System Mechanical and Structural Engineer Station Electrical Engineering Department - System Station Electrical Engineer Operational Anaiysis Department - System Operational Analysis Engineer

• The Manager of Quality Assurance directs the quality .

   . . -* -*-*** ****a.ssl.irarice' activities for the design' procurement and construc-tion of the Company's nuclear power facilities and with the Atomic Energy Commission Directorate of Regulatory Operations, Region III (:Construction).:._ The Quality Assurance Administrator reports directly to the Manager of Quality Assurance. He has responsibility for administering such quality assurance activities and has authority and organizational freedom to identify problems; to initiate, recommend. or provide solutions.

This organization is independent of the groups and individuals directl responsible for performing specific activities to which such quality assurance is applicable. I I

                                                       *DATE_. 12/1/73  (Rev.2) PAGE~ OF~

Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALITY REQUIREMENT o_ __ Q.R. NO. _1......__

       *1

• 1 GENERAL (Continued)

The Vice President (Licensing, Construction and Environmental Affairs) directs the actjvities of departments responsible for

              *licensing, construction, construction testing, and environ-mental affairs.

The Manager of Production is responsible for the activities of departments and divisions concerned with the operation and maintenc;mce of the Company's generating facilities" as well as control over the bulk power transmission system. The departments and divisions and the person responsible for activity within each are as follows: Nuclear and Fossil Systems Department - Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems f Power Supply Department - Superintendent of System Power Supply

• .**- Production, Nuclear Division -

Superintendent of Production-Division A Production, Fossil Division - Superintendent of Production-Division B Production Maintenance Department - Superintendent of Production-Maintenance The General Division Manager is responsible for the activities of the seven Operating Divisions and the Operating Manager. These Divisions are assigned responsibilty for

• those activities concerned with distribution of power as well as service to customers and public relations within their respective geographical areas including operation and

         ,     maintenance and inspection of electrical transmission and distribution facilities. Th~ Operating Manag~r's responsibility includes the Transmission and Distribution Constructibn Department which has functional responsibility and control for Division Substation Construction activities.

A Division Vice. Pres{dent is responsible .for each Division. A Division Operating Manager reports to the Division Vice _President. The Division Operating Manager is responsible for Division Substation Construction and Division Operational Analysis activities~ DATE 12/1 /73 * (Rev* 2) PAGE2-. OF _g_g_

Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 1.0 1 .1 GENERAL (Continued) The Vice President (Purchasing) is responsible for purchasing activities related to the Company's nuclear facilities including nuclear fuel. He is also responsible for generating station storekeeping activities.

1. 2 ORGANIZATION The Commonwealth Edison Company organization as related to quality assurance is shown in Figures 1-0, 1-1 and 1-7.

Departmental and divisional organization showing the Quality Assurance function is shown in Figures 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-5 and 1-6. 1.3 SCOPE Specific responsibilities for implementation of the Quality Assurance Program are assigned to the Commonwealth Edison Company organizational groups as outlined in Paragraphs 1.4 through 1.7. The scope of responsibilities involved in a nuclear project is divided into four Phases. Phase I - Definitions of system design and quality requirements. and acceptance of the quality o~ design. Phase II - Verification that.design and quality requirements have been met during construction. Phase III - Base-Line in-service inspection; preoperational testing. Phase IV - Operation, in-service inspection, maintenance, repair, refueling and station modifications. 1.4 ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION RESPONSIBILITIES 1 .4.1 MECHANICAL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT The Mechanical and Structural Engineering Department is organized as shown in Figure 1-3. This department is responsible for Phases I and III and assists other departments for all Phases. DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev.2) PAGEl__ OF~

e Commonwealth Edison Company -*a QUALITY TITLE: ORGANIZATION ASSURANCE MANUAL QUALi TY . REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. _1........0..___ _ 1.4.1.1 For Phases I and III the Department delegates and also coordinates various segments of these activities with the Station Construction Department, Station Electric~l Engineering Department, Nuclear and Fossil. Systems Department,

                         . Operational Analysis Department and Production-Di vision A. For Phase IV station modifications design activity, the Mechanical and Structural Engineering Department has responsibility for design and schedules with assistance from the Station Electrical Engineering Department and the Nuclear and Fossil Systems Department.

1.4.1.2

                  ,J The System Mechanical and Structural Engineer-assigns a Project Engineer for-each nuclear generating station who coordinates the mechanical, structural and nuclear activities
                         *of the project. during design. a.nd construction, and as requested during subsequent st;ation modifications. The Project Engineer has the following responsibilities.

a. Review and control the scope of work involving the mechanical, structural, instrumentation, and control designs of the NSSS vendor and Architect Engineer to verify that applicable Safety Analysis Report (SAR), regulatory requirements .

and design bases are properly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures and Jnstructions. b~ Review and accept the specifications, drawings, and scope for mechanical and structural material, equipment and erection work, prepared by the Architect Engineer and NSSS vendor, to verify inclusion of inspection, testing and acceptance criteria.

c. Analyze bids, make purchase recommenda-tions, control expenditures and assure that necessary quality requirements are included in purchase orders and contracts.

DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev.2) PAGE~ OF-..ll.

              .Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY      ASSURANCE . MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION                                     QUALITY REQUIREMENT o_ __

Q. R. NO. _1.._..__ 1.4.1.2 (Continued)

d. Disposition of mechanical and structural design changes.

e. Review the Architect Engineer's .evalua-tion of fabricator's and erector's detailed designs, drawings and work instructions for reasonableness and completeness.

f. Review and approve resolution of nonconfor-mances relating to mechanical and structural portions of the generating station.

g. Establish the plans for the preoperational and start-up test programs.

h. Coordinate the preparation and review of

                         .preoperational and start-up test*

• procedures.

i. Coordinate the evaluation of the adequacy of .the results of the preoperational and start-up testing. Make recommendation for acceptance of test results when results are judged satisf~ctory~

j.* Develop overall schedules. 1.4.1.3 The Mechan'ical and Structural Engineering Department Quality Assurance Coordinator has the responsibility to assure that the following quality assurance activities are performed.

a. Development of quality procedures to be used by Mechanical and Structural Engineering in the Commonwealth Edison Quality Assurance Program.

b. Evaluation of contractors' quality assurance programs.

c. Acceptance or rejection of contractors' quality assurance programs.

DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev.2) PAGE~ OF~

• Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 1.0 1.4.1.3 (Continued)

d. Audits of the design review system of Architect Engineer and'NSSS vendor.

e. Audits of construction site activities.

f. Audits of off~site contractors, as necessary, or requested.

g. Purchase documents (i.e., specifications, drawings, procedures and instructions) are reviewed for assurance of the inclusion of Quality Assurance Requirements.

1.4.2 STATION ELECTRICAL ENGHTEERING DEPA::tTMENT The Station Electrical Engineering Department is organized with a System Station Electrical Engineer, a Station Design Staff Engineer, a Quality Assurance Coordinator, a Generating Station Section Engineer, General Design Engineers and Electrical Project Engineers as shown in Figure 1-4. This Department is delegated the responsibility for the electrical portion of Pha.se I and assist other departments with the electrical portion of all phases. 1.4:2.1 The System Station Electrical Engineer assigns a Project Engineer to each nuclear generating station who has the following responsibil~ties:

a. Review the electrical designs of the Architect Engineer and NSSS vendor to verify that applicable SAR, regulatory requirements and design base~ are properly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures and instructions.

b. Review the specifications for electrical material and equipment prepared by the Architect Engineer and NSSS vendor to verify inclusion of standards, inspection, testing and acceptance criteria.

DATE 1211 IT3 (Rev.2) PAGE~ OF~

Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q. R. NO. _1.;...:*:..;;o;...__ _ 1.4.2.1 (Continued)

c. Analyze electrical bids; make purchase recommendations and assure that necessary quality requirements are included in electrical purchase orders and contracts.

d. Participate with the Mechanical and Structural Engineering Department in developing overall schedules.

e. Review the Architect Engineer's evalua-tion of electrical fabricators and erectors detailed designs, drawings and work instruc-

                *         tions for reasonableness and completeness.

f. Review, make recommendation and approve resolutiori of nonconformances .related to electrical portions of the plant.

g. Disposition of electrical design changes.

h. Participate in the preparation and review of construction, preopetational and start-up test procedures.

i .. Review the design of electrical equipment which is supplied as a portion of the mechanical equipment purchased by the Mechanical and Structural Erigineering: Department.

j. Electrical engineering for station modifications, as requested and electrical engineering associated with station modifications involving mechanical revisions.

1.4.2.2 The Station Electrical Department Project Engineer coordinates the electrical portion of Phases I, II, III and IV of the Company Quality Assurance Program and provides electrical expertise

• DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev.2) PAGE2._ OFE.._*

Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q. R. NO. _1_.......o_ __ 1.4.2.3 The Station Electrical Engineering Department Quality Assurance Coordinator has the responsibility to assure that the following quality assurance activities are performed.

a. Development of quality assurance .and control procedures to be used by Station Electrical Engineering Department in the Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance Program.

b. Evaluation of electrical contractors quality assurance programs.

c. Acceptance or rejection of electrical contractors' quality assurance programs.

d. Audits of the electrical aspects of the design review system involving the Architect Engineer and NSSS vendor.

e. Audits of the construction site activities.

f. Audits of off-site contractors, as necessary, or requesteµ.

g. Electrical purchase documents (i.e~,

specifications, drawings, procedures and instructions) are reviewed for assurance of the inclusion of Quality Assurance Requirements. 1.4.3 STATION CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT The Station Construction Department is organized with a Manager, Technical Staff, Project Engineers and Field Engineers as shown in Figure 1-2. A Supervisor of Quality Assurance or Site Quality Assurance Coor.dinator is assigned to each construction site for

• Phase II.

1.4.3.1 The Manager of Station Construction Department assigns a Project Engineer to each Station who has the following responsibilities:

• DATE. 12/1 /73 (Rev.2) PAGE~ OF _ll. .
• Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. N0.~1~*~0;..._~-

1.4.3.1 (Continued)

a. Advisor to engineering departments for design suitability from a construetion viewpoint. *

b. Coordinate requests for field revisions.

c. Receipt of items including furnishing necessary storage facilities.

d. Assist Mechanical and Structural

                           . Engineering Department in development of overall schedule.

e. Verify conformance and completeness of contractor's installation or erection

                           *.to specification requirements.

f.

• Supervise and approve mechanical .and structural construction tests. *

g. Coordinate and provide assistance for electrical construction tests.

h. Coordinate preoperational tests.

1.4.3.2 The Station Construction Project Engineer is responsible for coordinating and directing Phase II of the Program, for activities affecting quality at suppliers.facilities and construction at the site. The Station Construction D~partment rec~ives assistance from the Mechanical and Structural Engineering, Station Electrical Engineering and Operational

                      *Analysis Departments. The Station Construction Department provides construction assistance
                     . and expertise to the total program including plant modifications under Phase IV.

1.4.4 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS DEPARTMENT The Operational Analysis Department is organized as shown in Figure 1-5. [)ATE 12/1/73 (Rev.2) PAGE--9._ OF.22.._

Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q. R. NO. _1~*:..;;o;._..__ 1.4.4.1 The System Operational Analysis Engineer has the.following responsibilities:

a. Participate in review of design specifica-tions to verify proper selection of materials and the inclusion of adequate electrical testing requirements.

b. Prepare procedures and conduct electrical construction tests as directed.

c. Participate in the preparation and review of preoperational and start-up test procedures.

d. Participate in and coordinate preoperational and start-up testing, as directed.

e. Maintain Commonwealth Edison Company off-site testing facilities and equip-ment required to fulfill the Department responsibilities.

f. Provide necessary assistance and expertise for baseline and in-service inspection.

g. Provide specialized testing services and

• equipment analysis such as instrument and equipment calibrations (traceable to national standards) and evaluation of materials.

1.4.4.2 The Operational Analysis Department provides specialized field testing services through its technical staff specialists, standardizing and calibration services and materials expertise for the total program. The Depart-ment is responsible for inspection and proof testing of electrical generation, transmission and distribution equipment. The Company Level III NDE person is assigned to this department. DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev.2) PAGE..2.2... OF~

Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. _ 1_._o_ _ 1.4.4.3 'The Operational Analysi~ Department Quality Assurance Coordinator has the responsibility to assure that the following quality assurance activities are performed:

a. Calibration is performed on test and measurement equipment as required.

b. Auditing the performance of destructive and nondestructive testing as directed.

c. Review of fabricator and erector work instruction for inclusion on nondestructive and electrical testing

                 ~            requirements.

d. Review results of electrical construction tests.

-- 1.4.5

e. Nondestructive test personnel qualifications records are-maintained.

QUALITY ASSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR .(Engineering & Construction) The Quality Assurance Administrator reports to the Manager of Quality Assurance and is responsible for administration of the Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance Requirements and Procedures established for the design and construction phases of nuclear power generating stations. Specifically, he will direct the efforts of the Supervisors of Quality Assurance, Site Quality Assurance Coordinators and each Quality Assurance Coordinator in the Mechanical & Structural Engineering, Station Electrical Engineering and Operational Analysis Departments. He maintains a cognizance of the Operations portion of the Quality Assurance Program to determine that it interfaces with the design and construction quality assurance phases. He shall serve as liaison .with the quality assurance organizations of the NSSS Vendor, Architect Engineer and* contractors - as necessary - to assure that compliance with the applicable Codes, Standards and Regulations are met. The Quality Assurance Administrator will regularly inform the Manager of Quality Assurance of significant quality assurance developments and/or

               'problem areas. He will also inform the Superintendent

_1 DATE _:12/1 /73 (Rev. 2 > PAGE--2!._ OF~

a9 Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL ~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--r~~~~~-----, TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 1 *0 1.4.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR (Engineering & Construction) of Nuclear and Fossil Systems and, where applicable, the Fuel Agent, of significant quality assurance questions related to construction for station modifica-tions or fuel fabrication. The Quality Assurnnce Administrator has sufficient authority to identify problem areas and require corrective action. 1.4.5.1 Su ervisor of Quality Assurance or Qualit Assurance Coordinator Engineering & Construction) A Supervisor of Quality Assurance or a Quality Assurance Coordinator reports to the Quality Assurance Administrator and is responsible for the quality activities within his specific department. He is responsible to observe and inform the Quality Assurance Administrator of any failure that documenta-tion for required Safety Analysis Reports, Quality Assurance Manual Reports, design reports, construction reports and test reports are properly executed and maintained. The Supervisor of Quality Assurance or a Quality Assurance Coordinator is responsible for reviews and audits to assure that the above require-ments are met and that nonconformances are resolved.

• A. Engineering - The Engineering Department Quality Assurance Coordinators (Mechanical

                             & Structural and Station Electrical) are responsible for assuring that General Office audits of the Construction Site activities are carried out. They also maintain surveillance of required documenta-tion of modification activities at operating stations where Engineering Department responsibility is involved.

B. Operational Analysis - The Operational Analysis Department Quality Assurance Coordinator is responsible for assuring that calibration procedures and records DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev* 2) PAGE.2.L OF 22 '~ ~

Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL -~*-*~~~~~~~~~~--~~~--r--~~~------~ TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 1.0 1.l;.* 5.1 (Continued) B. (Continued) are maintained for Nuclear Station Test and Measurement equipment. He also maintains surveillance of required documentation of the testing and inspec-tion activities related to Operational Analysis Department.

c. Construction Site - The Supervisor of Quality Assurance or Site Quality Assurance Coordinator is responsible, for assuring off-site vendor inspections and surveillance, surveillance of site contractor quality activities, compliance of material and e~uip ment with procurement document requirements, maintenance of quality records filed at the site, and direction of the Site Quality Assurance Group activities.

The Site Quaiity Assurance Group will vary with the volume of quality oriented activity at the site. Generally, the number will vary from one to six, although in the preconstructicin and *early stages of construction, the Site Quality Assurance Coordinator may perform these activities alone.

• ___........*..... .

The Supervisor of Quality Assurance or Site Quality Assurance Coordinator has the responsibility that the following quality assurance activities are performed:

a.

• Development and approval rif site contractor construction quality control procedures.

b. Review and approval of site contractor

                                   . qual,i ty assurance programs.

c. Advise engineering departments of Bidder

                                   *Quality Assurance capabilities when requested.

d~ Maintain surveillance*of off-site and site contractors to verify conformance to approved quality control programs and procedures. DATE

• 12/1 /73 (Rev. 2 ) PAGE.21.... OF~

Commonwealth Edison Company I QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALITY REQUIREMENT

                                                       . Q.R. NO. _1.;. . ;:*;,. ; ;.o_ __

1.4.5.1 (Continued) C. (Continued)

e. Assure accumulation, filing and maintenance of quality assurance documents and records required for site construction.

f. Review and acceptance of nondestructive test documentation.

g. Identify and maintain file for si~e nonconforming items and follow-up*and monitor corrective action required for disposition of site nonconformances.

h. Monitor calibration records for test equipment involved in site construction activities.

i. Assure safekeeping of quality assurance.

documentation during construction. *

j. Maintain surveillance of material receiving reports and coordinate required corrective actions.

k. Review on-site contractor surveillance reports for quality problems and coordinate corrective actions.

            *1.4.5.2  Nuclear Fuel Fabrication Inspector The Nuclear Fuel Fabrication Inspector has the responsibility for surveillance of fuel fabrication at vendor's plant. He reports to the Quality Assurance Administrator.

1.5 PRODUCTION RESPONSIBILITIES 1.5.1 NUCLEAR AND FOSSIL SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT The Nuclear and Fossil Syste!!ls Department is shown in Figure 1-6. This department is responsible for the functional direction of on-site technical staff. The functional direction of the technical staff includes DATE 12/ 1 /73 (Rev. 2 ) PAGE~ OF~

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL

---

~~~~~~--~~-r-~~----~

TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q. R. NO. _..;...:..;1.o:;.....___ 1.5.1 NUCLEAR AND FOSSIL SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT (Continued) reactor core physics calculations, fuel management, chemistry and radiochemistry analysis and environmental monitoring. This Department also reviews new Station designs. The Superintendent, Nuclear and Fossil Systems, is responsible for the following Operations Quality Assurance Program activities:

a. The establishment and administration of the program.

                                           ~

b. Off-site review, investigative and audit activities as described in the Administrative Section 6.0 of .the station Technical Specifications.

c. Informing the Manager of Production of significant problems affecting the administratioti of the program.

1.5.1.1 Quality Assurance Administrator (Production) The Quality Assurance Administrator reports to the Superintendent, Nuclear and Fossil Systems, and is independent of the groups and individuals directly responsible for performing specific activities. He has responsibility

• and authority for: *

a. Coordinating, reviewi~g and updating of the Operations portion of the Quality Assurance Program.

b. Review and approval of Quality Procedures and changes thereto for the Operations portion of the Quality Assurance Program.

c. Review of Quality Assurance reports sent to Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems to identify problems; initiate, recommend, or provide solutions; and to verify implementation of solutions.

1.5.1.~ Quality Assurance Engineer The Quality Assurance Engineer assigned to a station reports to the Quality Assurance Administrator (Production) and has authority and responsibility for the surveillance of: DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev.2) PAGE-12... oF_E_

Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL .-.--~--~~--~~~~~~~~----, TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q. R. NO. ___ 1 ~*o.____ 1.5.1.2 Quality Assurance Engineer (Continued)

a. The preparation and revision of the station procedures for administration, maintenance and.operations.

b. Implementation of .the Operations portion of the Quality Assurance Program.

c. The completion of documentation showing that the required inspections and tests were performed.

d. The completion of reported corrective action.

e. The incorporation of approved engineering changes into station maintenance and operating procedures.

1.5.2 PRODUCTION-DIVISION A Commonwealth's generating stations are divided into

              *two production divisions. The Superintendent of Production-Division A is*responsible for the administra-tion of the operation, maintenance and refueling

• activities of nuclear stations* He is also responsible for implementation of the Quality Procedures and for development of station procedures. He coordinates the outages and modifications during Phase IV. He provides liaison with the Atomic Energy Commission Directorate of Regulatory Operations, Region III (Reactor Testing and Start-up Unit and Reactor Operation Unit). The nuclear Station Superintendents report directly to him.

Additional responsibilities of the Superintendent of Produ6tion-Division A are: In-service inspection, safety, compliance with licenses and environmental standards, personnel selection and.training, and liaison

              . between stations and other utilities.

1.5.2.1 .Station Superintenden~ Each nuclear generating station is managed by a Station Superintendent who is responsible for overall administrative management of the DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev. 2) PAGE...!.§_ OF~

• Commonwealth Edison Company QUAL.ITY ASSURANCE MANUAL.

TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 1.0 1~5.2.1 Station Superintendent (Continued) station and implementation of the Operations

                       *portion of the Quality Assurance Program.

This responsibility includes industrial relations, planning, coordination, o~eration, maintenance, refueling and technical services. The Station Superintendent is responsible for compliance with the station's AEC Operating License, other government regulations and company procedures. He authoriz~s station procedures and modifications. He supervises the station's on-site review and audit function as required by the Administrative Section 6.0 of the Technical Specifications. 1.5.2.2 Assistant Superintendent Responsibility for the day-to-day operating, maintaining and refueling activities for the station is delegated to the Assistant* Superintendent. Reporting to him are! (1) Station Operating Engineers, (2) Maintenance En~ineer, (3) T~chnical Staff Supervisor, (4) Training Supervisor and (5) Office Supervisor.

• 1.5.2.3 Technical Staff Supervisors The Technical Staff Supervisor provides*

technical support for plant operations, refueling, maintenanc~ and modifications, and evaluates

                     .. process data and equipment performance .. He is also responsible for providing the following:

a. *.Development, revision and approval of station procedures for the operations portion of the Quality Assurance Program.

b. On-site review, investigative audit and approval activities as described in the Administrative Section 6.0 of the station Technical Specifications.

c. Witnessing of assigned testing.

                                      *DATE. 12/1 /73  (Rev.2) PAGE-22... OF~

Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 1 .O 1.~.2.3 {Continued)

d. Verifying completion of modifications and equipment maintenance.

e. Verifying incorporation of approved engineering changes into station maintenance and operating procedures.

f. Verifying completion of reported corrective action.

1.5.2.3.1 Instrument Engineer The Instrument Engineer is responsible for directing the main-tenance, including repair, of all instrument equipment in the station. His responsibility includes planning work, providing on-the-job training of instrument personnel, arranging for the maintenance work and its inspection to be performed, and initiating requisitions for the procurement of instruments and parts from vendors and services from contractors. The Instrument Engineer reports to the Technical Staff Supervisor. 1~5.2.4 Maintenance Engineer The Maintenance Engineer is responsible for directing the maintenance, including repair, of all except instrumentation. His responsi-bility includes planning work, providing on-the-job training of maintenance personnel, arranging for the maintenance work and its inspection to be performed, and initiating requisitions for the procurement of tools, equipment and parts from vendors and services from contractors. DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev. 2 ) PAGE.JlL OF.£?__

8 Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL ____, TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q. R. N 0. ___..;1...:.*..;;.o_ __ 1.5.2.5 Operating Engineers The Operating Engineers are responsible for the operation of the mechanical and electrical equipment and certain common plant systems, such as fuel handling and radioactive waste processing, assigned to them by the Assistant Superintendent. They are responsible for recommending maintenance for such equipment and for authorizing functional acceptance tests to be conducted by operating and/or Technical Staff personnel. The Operating Engineers are responsible for shift operations and the Shift Engineers report to them. 1.5.2.6 Shift Engineer The Shift Engineer on duty is responsible for operating the plant in complaince with the station Operating License and the station

• operating procedures. During his shift, the Shift Engineer is in charge of the entire plant operation, and is responsible for the plant being oper~ted in a safe and reliable condition.

He receives direction from the Operating

• Engineers.

1.5.2.7 Training Supervisor The Training Supervisor is responsible for the training and retraining of operating and maintenance personnel. His responsibility includes planning, scheduling, preparing, presenting and documenting completion of training courses. 1.5.2.8 Office _Supervisor The Office Supervisor is responsible for directing the activities of the station's clerical staff and for maintaining files of quality assurance documents assigned to him. He also serves as the station Security Officer and directs the station's security plan activities.

.DATE. 1-2/1 /73 (Rev.2) .PAGE.1L OF _g_

• Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL

---

~~~~~~_...-~~~~~~~,.---~~~--------~

TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q. R. NO. _1..........0._____ 1.5.3 PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT

                   .The Production Maintenance Department is shown in Figure 1-6. This department is responsible for functional direction of maintenance activities (Phase IV) as shown in Figure 1-7.

1.5.3.1 The Superintendent-Production Maintenance has the following responsibilities:

a. Functional direction of electrical and mechanical maintenance activities of generating stations.

b. Spare parts inventory control.

c. Authorizing procurement of spare parts and materials and assuring that quality assurance documentatio~ is specified on purchase order. .

d. Liaison with Commonwealth stations and departments, manufacturers and other utilities on maintenance matters.

e. Advising the scheduling of maintenance outages of nuclear generating stations.

1.5.4 POWER SUPPLY DEPARTMENT The Power Supply Department is shown in Figure 1-6. This department is responsible for managing the bulk power system with the objectives of safe operation, reliable service and efficient utilization of Company-owned production facilities. 1.5.4.1 The Superintendent of Power Supply has the following responsibilitie~:

a. Scheduling power generation.

b. Purchase of power from neighboring utilities

• DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev.2)PAGE...1.Q. OF~

Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 1.0 1.5.4.1 (Continued)

c. Coordinating the operation of the Commonwealth system with the Mid-America Inter-Pool Network and other interconnected utili ti.es.

c. Final scheduling of outages for generating stations. for corrective and preventive maintenance.

1.5;5 TRAINING (Production) A General Staff Engineer coordinates training activities for Commonwealth's generating stations. As such, he is responsible for preparation of training materials, surveillance of on-the-job instruction, and evaluation of simulator training facilities and the scheduling of off-site training. 1.6 PURCHASING RESPONSIBILITIES 1.6.1 .FUEL AGENT The Fuel Agent is responsible for the procurement of nuclear fuel to specifications furnished by the Mechanical and Structural Engineering Department. The Fuel Agent reports to the Vice President, Purchasing. 1.6.2 STATION STOREKEEPER The Station Storekeeper reports to the Director of Stores and Material Control under the Vice President, Purchasing. The Station"Storekeeper receives functional direction from the Assistant Station Superintendent for station storekeeping activities. He is responsible for administration 'of the station storeroom including receiving, inspecting, storing and issuing spare parts, materials and equipment. His responsibility includes verifying the receipt of specified quality assurance documents for spare parts~ material and equipment directed to him, maintaining inventory records of spare parts, materials and equipment and complying with special handling and storing instructions. DATE 12/1/73 (Rev. 2 ) PAGEgj__ OF~

Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL e.--~~~~~~~~~-y---"--~~____, TITLE: ORGANIZATION QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. ~1~*~0---~~

l. 7 DIVISION OPERATIONS RESPONSIBILITIES .

1.7.1 SUBSTATION CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT The Substation Construction Department performs electrical modifications at nuclear generating stations as directed and in accordance with the provision of this Quality Assurance Manual. A Substation Construction Procedures Manual is used to control specific procenses and procedures unique to electrical construction and 1nstallat1ono Approved: Ul__U/~ 11-z.,.7,

• M*kage; of Quality Assurance DATE 12/1/73 (Rev.2) PAGE~ OF 22

CHAIRMAN OF BOARD AND

                                                                                                                ~ EXECUTIVE VICEEXECUTIVE PRESIDENT L--------....11.smmm-.-mma---.,      PRESIDENT 1

VICE PRESIDENT I I

, r VICE PRESIDENT                                                                                                                      GENERAL DIVISION ,.

MANAGER OF MANAGER OF MANAGER VlCE PRESIDENT l CONSTRUCTION, VICE PRESIDENT lPURCHASINGl LICENSING, AND QUALITY . ASSURANCE l ENGINEERING l PRODUCTION (OPERATIONS) j (FIGURE 1-6)

• ENVIRONMENTALl.

MANAGER ASSISTANT STATION VICE PRESIDENT CONSTRUCTION (ENGINEERING} CORPORATE LEVEL (FIGURE 1-2) LICENSING ADMINISTRATOR DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL I i I SUPT. OF PROO. DIV. A SUPT. OF PROO. I DIV. 8 I SUPT. OF PROD. I SUPT. OF NUC.. & FOS. SYSTEMS I

                                                                                                                                                                                       ,..._J_ -,~
                                                                                                                                                                                          ;;JP'. Of POWE~'.

su~PL:' i l FUEL PWR AFFAIRS MAINT. AGENT LICENSING ADMINISTRATOR BWR QUALITY ASSURANCE I SYSTEM MECHANICAL AND STRUCTURAL I I SYSTEM STATION ELECTRICAL ENGINEER I I f SYSiEM OP£RATIONAL: ANALYSIS ENGINEER : I

                                                                                                                                                                                 .               I SITE             ADMINISTRATOR               ENGINEER                        ( FIG~RE 1-4)                 ,. ,           ( r1GuRE 1-4 l              :

PROJECT ENGR. (FIGURE 1-1)

                                                                               ~

(FIGUR.E 1-3) _J

• FUEL SUPERVISOR FIELD ENGINEER 1.

M. s. ENGRG. aQUALITY

• l I<"Tj\ !

                                                                                                                   .J ""*

El .-.... ENGRG

                                                                                                                               '"'....\.>.

QUM.!TY

                                                                                                                                              *

• If-~ . .:. oi:t1=.---l

                                                                                                                                                                       * *00ALIT'f  -* . ;

i* , SUPERVISORS ASSURANCE COORDINATOR i AS~;-JRANCE. COQPJ!NATOR I '1 t:; .:_'JRAW<'.' CO~~nlNATO~: OF . _ I- - - - - * - . -a u_. L - . - ... *~---

• Q. A. OR Q. A. ! 1 -...~~

COORDINATORS ~ (S:TE)  : FIGURE 1-0 ORGANIZATION CHART NUCLEAR FUELl RELATED TO 111 FABRICATION Ii QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTOR 10-19-73

EXEc9vE VICE PRESIDENT

                . MANAGER OF QUALl{Y ASSURANCE         ~
                               .  ~ I QUALITY SUPT. OF PRODUCTION DIV. A
                                                                                                        ......       SUPT.OF
                                                                                                                  *NUCLEAR 8

' ASSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR (FIGURE 1-7) t:I r 0 FOSSIL

• SYSTEMS

                         -                                                                           ~* ;ii (ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION)                                              STA. SUPT.      J 51 ASST. SUPT.         ~.
                                                                                                           ~
                                                                                                           ~.

QUALITY ASSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR

     .I                                       I          .. I                                                    (PRODUCTION )

SUP ERV IS IORS MBS ST. ELECT. SYSTEM OF ENGINEERING ENG I NEER I NG O.A.O. Q. A. OR Q. A. QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY COORDINATORS ASSURANCE ASSURANCE ASSURANCE

    .(SITE)        COORDINATOR                                                 QUALITY    QUALITY           .QUALITY            QUALITY COORDINATOR     COORDINATOR           ASSURANCE  ASSURANCE          ASSURANCE          ASSURANCE ENGINEER   ENGINEER           ENGINEER           ENGINEER DRESDEN QUAD CITIES             ZION          *LA SALLE (FUTURE)

SITE NUCLEAR

  .QUALITY                       FUEL ASSURANCE                   FABR ICATiON                                                  QUALITY            QUALITY PERSONNEL                    INSPECTOR                                                  ASSURANCE          ASSURANCE ENGINEER          ENGINEER BYRON           BRAiDWOOD (FUTURE).          (FUTURE}
                                                                                                                             . FIGURE 1-1 ORGANIZAllON CHART QUALITY ASSURt.NCE 11-26-7~

MANAGER STATION CONSTRUCTION SITE QUALITY ASSURANCE

            .SUPERVISOR OR COORDINATOR TECH. STAFF INDEPENDENT INSPECTION AGENCIES I

ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL STRUCTURAL

                                                                 *-*   NUCLEAR GEN. STATION PROJECT ENGR. .

I I r;--~* I SYSTEM Ir I ELECTRICAL I MECHANICAL I STRUCTURAL I OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS DEPT. II II FIELD . ENGR. FIELD ENGR. FIELD ENGR. I I

 *1   SITE 0. A. D.
                    *I JI .

ENGINEER i_: _ _ :..J FIGURE 1-2 STATION .CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT. 1'2-1-73

                                  . SYSTEM           I MEC HAN 1CAL a STRUCTURAL  I ENGINEER          I STAT I Or~    MECHANICAL 8                   STRUCTURAL           ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN         STRUCTURAL                       GROUP                 GROUP DESIGN ENGR SECTION        . STAFF a                      ENGINEERS              ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS          OFFICE                       DRAFTSMEN             DRAFTSMEN PERSONNEL I

I PROJECT ENGINEERS I QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY ASSURANCE COOROI NATOR ADMINISTRATOR MECH ENGRS CIVIL ENGRS NUCLEAR ENGRS ENGRG ASST FIG!JRE I - 3 MECHANICAL ANO I STRUCTURAL. ENGINEERING I DEPARTMENT I 8 73

                                                    , SYSTEM STATION ELECTRICAL ENGINEER STATION DESIGN STAFF ENGINEER

• QUALITY QUALITY ASSURANCE ..._._.~~ASSURANCE COORDINATOR ADMINISTRATOR GENERATING STATIONS SECTION ENGINEER I I I I GENERAL DESIGN .GENERAL DESIGN GENERAL DESIGN GENERAL DESIGN
• ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER I I I ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL . '

ELECTRICAL ,. ELECTRICAL PROJECT - ---*.  ;,. ..... PROJECT *- *-- .. PROJECT - . -**** PROJECT -- ENGINEERS ENGlNEERS ENGINEERS ENGINEERS FIGURE I- 4 STATION ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 5- I - 73

SYSTEM OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ENGINEER

                                                          ----        QUALITY ASSURANCE COORDINATOR QUALITY
                                                                                             ..+-ASSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR SUPERVISING                                                    SUPERVISING STAFF ENGINEER                                                 STAFF ENGINEER r----,

I ELECTRONICS ELECTRONICS POWER II STATION GENERATION ANO MATERIALS AND. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IS ITEl I GROUP INSTRUMENTS GROUP GROUP RELAYS GROUP GROUP I I COMPUTER CORROSION I ELECTRICAL I* SITE O.A.D . ELECTRONICS GROUP GROUP I FIELD ENGINEER ENGINEER FIGURE 1-5 I L _ _ _J OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS DEPARTMENT 5-1-11

MANAGER OF PRODUCTION

            *"if,.

SUPERINTENDENT SUPERINTENDENT OF SUPERINTENDENT OF STAFF SUPERINTENDENT OF SUPERINTENDENT OF OF PRODUCTION PRODUCTION TRAINING PRODUCTION NUCLEAR 8 FOSSIL POWER SUPPLY DIVISION A DIVISION 8 EMPLOYE RELATIONS **MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS ELECTRICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE MECHANICAL NUCLEAR REACTOR GAS TURBINE ANALYSIS STATION INVENTORY CONTROL CHEMISTRY SUPERINTENDENT RADIATION PROTECTION ENVIRONMENTAL NEW PLANT ASS~ SUPERINTENDENT OF STATION TRAINING TECH STAFF SUPERVISOR OFFICE SUPERVISOR MAINTENANCE ENGINEER I~..... J . QUALi TY ASSURANCE MASTER MECHANIC * . REACTOR PHYSICS CHEMISTRY FOREMAN SHIFT RADIATION PROTECTION ENVIRON MENTAL ENGINEER THERMAL FOREMAN INSTRUMENTATION FIGURE 1-6

                                                ----=---
                                                - - - - - - - - ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONAL MANAGER OF PRODUCTION 11-1-71

MANAGER OF PRODUCTION SUPERINTENDENT OF SUPERINTENDENT OF SUPERINTENDENT OF NUCLEAR 8 FOSSIL PRODUCTION PRODUCTION SYSTEMS DIVIS>ION A MAINTENANCE I QUALITY I ASSURANCE ~................. . STATION SUPERINTENDENT I (PRODUCTION) ADMINISTRATOR I 1.------- 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE I ENGINEER ----------- 1--------' ASST. SUPERINTENDENT I I I I L-~ TECH STAFF STOREKEEPER OPERATING MAINTENANCE

                                                                                                    --J.

SUPERVISOR ENGINEERS ENGINEER OFFICE SUPERVISOR SHIFT ENGINEERS

................. : ................ ~ ........................... .

l FIGURE I *17 l PRODUCTION

                                         - - - - - - - - ADMINISTRATIVE                                             OUAL ITY A SSUR ~NCE
                                         ------FUNCTIONAL                                                           PROGRAM DIRECTION
                                         ***************.*******AUDIT (PER TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS)                                 11-26*7.S

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM QUALi TY REQUIREME.1~T Q.R. NO. 2.0 2 .1 GENERAL The Commonwealth Edison Company has extensive experience with the development, scheduling, design, construction and operation of electric generating facilities. It has pioneered in commercial nuclear power. Commonwealth Edison Company and its consultants and vendors have established desi~ns and specif ica-tions for compliance with applicable regulations, codes and standards to assure installations of utmost safety and reliability. Commonwealth Edison Company has established qualified equipment suppliers and contractors through experience, evaluation at vendor plants, and site surveillance during plant erection. These efforts add assurance thRt compliance with applicable design specifications and codes is maintained and a high lPvel of reliability is achieved. Furthermore, Commonwealth Edison Company has maint8ined a history of reliable service to its customers with ~afe opera-tion of its plants.

• 2.2 POLICY It is the policy of Commonwealth Edison Company to 8ssure a high degree of functional inte~rity of the eqtiipment, structures and s::1fety-rela_ted :3ystems of its nuclear generating facilities, the performance.of which are essential to the prevention of nuclear accidents that could cause undue risk to the health and safety of the publlc, or to the mitigation of the consequences of such accidents in the unlikely event they shou]d occur. These systems, equipment, and structures will be identified, designed, fabricated, erected, tested and operated to the criteria and requirements of ASM~

Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Sections III and XI, ANSI N45.2 and N18.7 Stand3rds and 10CFR50. The responsi-bility for these activities is described in Quality Req1Jire-ment 1.0. It is also the policy of CommonweaJ.th Edison CompAny to assure a high degree of functional integrity for its generating facilities so as to achieve high availability of these facilities for the production of eJectric power. DATE 12/1 /T3 (Rev. 1 ) PAGE_l_ OF~

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 2.0 2.2 POL.ICY (Continued) Also it is th~ policy of Commonwealth Edison Company to maintain ~ overall quality levels which will achieve the foregoing in a safe, effective and economic manner. 2.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCRAM The quality assurance programs of Commonwealth Edison Company, Architect Engineers, and Nuclear Steam Supply System vendors include ASME Section III Article NA-4000 requirements, the quality assurance criteria for nuclear power plants of Appendix B to 10CFR50 "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," ANSI-N45.2, "Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants," and ANSI-NH~. 7, Standards for Administrative Control for Nuclear Power Plrmts." In addition, individual contractor's, fabricator's, and vendor's QuaJity Assurance pro~r8ms will include the applicnble portions of Code~ Standards ahd Appendix B as they affect the total program. A description of these progrAms ls included in the quality assurance section of the SAR for each nuclear generating station. A copy of the SAR will be avail~ble to the Quality Assurance, Operations, Construction, and Engineerin areas, as necessary, for reference and use. The overall Commonwealth Edison Company quality assurance program as a minimum provides for engineering design control, audit and surveillance of on-site contractors and off-site vendors, surveillance ~nd audit of the performance and quality assurance procedures of the Architect Engineer and CECo Engineering, Purchasing and Construction Groups, and for plant operations quality assurance programs covering plant maintenance, repairs, operations, in-service surveillance and modifications. The appropriate levels of Commonwealth Edison Company management will be advised of quality deficiencies on a regular basis or as necessary to achieve timely resolution of quality problems. In addition, upper management will become directly involved to the extent required to effect corrective action by CommonweRlth Edison Company personnel, site contrActors, or vendors. (Ref. C>.R. 1.0) DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev .1) PAGE___L. OF_4_

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM QUALi TY REQUIREMEl'1T Q.R. NO. _ 2_._o___

2. 3 QUAI I'T'Y ASSUf*U.NCE PROGRAM (Continued)

Achievements of the applicable requirements of codes, standards, and specifications for materials, structures, equipment, and systems will be verified through quality control activities. The control activities will encompass design, procurement specifications, materials, processes, procedures, identification, testing, nonconformance, corrective action, documentation, handling, storage, operation, maintenance, modifications, in-service surveillance and repair. 2.4 RESPONSIBILITY Commonwealth Edison Company is responsible for implementation of the quality assurance program for its nuclear power gener0ting stations. Portions of this program will be delegated to - and carried out by - the Architect Engineer, the Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSS~3) vendor, and other contractors as required. Responsibility for implementation of the quality assurance program for nuclear power generating stations within Commonwealth

      ~u1son Company is described in Quality Require~ent 1.0.

• 2.5 OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Commonwealth Edison Company quality assurance program are to: (1) establish with confidence that the design, fabrication, erection, and operation of its nuclear power generation fucilities are performed in a manner consistent with the policies stated in Paragraph 2.2; (2) provide for documenting, retaining documentation, and updating design, fabrication, erection and product quality information necessary for Commonwealth Edison Company operation, maintenance, repair, modification, refueling and in-service surveillance of the nuclear power facilities; (3) prevent schedule delays and high cost due to poor quality; and (4) provide hir,h plant reliability and ~vailability.

2.6 APPLICABILITY The Quality Assurance Pror:ram applies to safety-related 8nd/or ASME Section IJ J :1ctivi ti.es and equipment. These :;ctivi ties and equi.pmerit <ire described in the qu:ili ty assurance section CJf the SAH. for each p.lant and furt.her, in spec if icat ions :md proce-dures developed in carrying out the Quality Assurance Pro~ram. A copy of the SAR will be available in the Operations, DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev .1) PAGE_l_ QF_4_

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 2.0 2.6 APPLICABILITY (Continued) Construction, Quality Assurance and Engineering areas, as necessar~ for reference. The requirements in ASME Section III, Article NA-4000 shall be applied to Section III systems and components. The 18 criteria of Appendix B of 10CFR50 will be applied to safety-related systems 8nd componerits for desi~n, construction, maintenance, refuelin~, repair, and station modification. Criteria 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, and 14 to 18 will bH applied to operation of safety-related systems and components.

2. 7 REVISIONS TO TIH*; LJUALITY ASSUR/l.NCE PROGl-{AM The Quality Assurance Administrator and the Superintendent of Nuclear & Fossil Systems will be responsible for assuring a regular review of the status and adequacy of the Quality Assurance Manual. The Quality Requirements in the Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance Manual and revisions thereto are approved by the Manager of Quality Assurance and the Manager of Production and may only be revised with their approval.

The Quality Requirements and Quality Procedures shall be revised where such revision affects ASME: Section III activities for Class 1, 2, 3, and MC components with the concurrence of the Authorized Inspection Agency. Respective Department Quality Procedures involving engineering and construction and revisions thereto are approved by the Head of the issuing department and the Quality Assurance Administrator, and for the Quality Procedures of the Nuclear Stations by the Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems. 2.8 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Sections 2 and 5 of the Quality Procedures provide the procedures for implementing this section of the Quality Requirements. Approved By: DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev.1) PAGE--.JL. OF--.!L.

8 Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: DESIGN CONTROL QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. _3_._o___ 3.1 GEi'ff:HAL The prime responsibility for design control of mechanical, structural, and r1uclear related systems and components is ciss ir~ned to the Mechanic8J and Structural Engineering Depart-ment. Likewise, the prime responsibility for design control of electrical systems and components is assigned to the Station Electrical Engineerin~ Department. Each department will control design by coordinating an evalua-tion of the design documents. The extent of the design evalua-tion will be determined by the complexity of the system and any safety-related function to be performed by that system. Evaluation by the Architect Engineer, the Nuclear Steam Supply System vendor, and/or Commonwealth Edison Company Engineering Departments will assure that designs and materials will conform to the applicable codes, standards, regulatory requirements, SAi< commitments, and appropriate quaJ.ity standards, as applicable. Commonwealth Edison Comp~ny Engineering Departments will evolua te the de:o.i.r-n for safety, rel i3bili ty, inspectabil i ty, mg j_nta i_nabili ty and construe talli li ty. The .'.Juperintendent of Procluction and the Superi_ntendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems will be responsible for review of the design for operability, inspectability and maintainability. Coordination of the design evaluation effort by the responsible Commonwealth- Edison Company Engineering Departments will be, in part, directed toward the identification and control of design interfaces. The cognizant Commonwealth Edison Company Engineering Depart-ments, with assistance from other organizations or contr8ctors, shall apply desiGn control measures to items such as: reactor physics, stress, ther6al, hydraulic, transient and accident analysis; compAtibility of materials; accessibility for in-s~rvice inspection, mainten:1nce, and repair; and delineation of acceptance criteria for inspections and tests.

3. 2 DC.CUM:C:NTATIGN Evidence of design evaluntion will be documented and retained by the responsibl.e Commonwealth Edison Company Engineering Department.

DATE 12/1/73 (Rev* 1 ) PAGE_l_ OF--~:_

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: DESIGN CONTROL QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. __...3......_o_ _

3. 3 EV Al UATH1N OF DESIC;tJ CH/\f*iGES Control of design changes will be by evaluation. The extent of the evaluation will be determined by the complexity of the chnnge and its safety-related function with respect to the ori~inal design. Coordin~tion of evaluation of design changes will be by the Commonwealth Edison Company Engineering Departffient having prime responsibility for design control, i.e., either the Mechanical and Structural or the Station Electrical Engineering Departments. The control of documents will be maintained within the system described in Qua:iity Requirement 6.0, "Document Control."

Plant modifications will lJe in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.59 and ASM1~ Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section lII where applicable and will be submitted to the Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems, the Station Superintendent and the Authorized Inspector for review prior to implementation. The Station Superintendent authorizes the modification. The

        , Technical Staff Supervisor is responsible for verifying that operating procedure changes are accomplished as station modifi-cations. The Superintendent of Nuclear Bnd fossil Systems reviews and approves proposed modifications to plant systen1s and components involvinf a revision to the Technical Specifica-tions or a previously unreviewed safety question.

3.4 INDEPENDENT REVIEW The verifying or checkin~ of desipn features is done by individuals or organiz3tions other than those who prepared the original desir.~n but who may be from the same organization.

z  ::

Ih?LEJ'f,ENTING PROCEDUfl2S Cuality Procedure Section 3 and 15 provide the implementing procedures for this sect.ion of the Quality Requirements. Approved By: ~. ;/-.,--,~

                      ;ag~. .1.ty A~surance DATE 12 /1 /73 (Rev.1) PAGE_?__ OF~

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASS.URANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALi TY REQUIREMENT PROCUREMBNT DOCUMENT CONTROL Q.R. NO. 4.0 4.1 G.l!:NERAL The quality requirements for each item or service to be procured will be clearly stated in the bid package, contracts, and pur-chase orders. ~uality Control inBpections and test requirements are included in applicable codes, and standards ~nd design specification requirements. Similarly, the reqtiired methods of identification, pre3e£vation, and packaging, ~nd methods of controlling conformance to acceptance criteria are covered by these documents. (.luality Assurance program requirements are included as needed in the o~iginal procurement contract to pro-vide for implementation of the approved quality assurance program, supplier evaluation, inspection and test planning, supplier surveillance, witnessing of inspection control points, and in-spection documentation. Replacement parts and equipment will be procured to requireillents equivRlent to or better than the original installation. Procurement controls are imposed ln U1e specificatj_onri by the. cognizant ~ngineering Department Project Engineer through l1is review of the procurement specifications prior to its iusuance to assure design requireruPnts are met. 4.2 D~SIGN REQUIREMENTS The bid package and the resulting contracts or purchase order will clearly reference applicable revision dates of appropriate drawings and specifications for the item or service bein~ pro-cured. Appropriate revisions of ANSI, ASME, or other applicable codes and/or standards will be considered a nart of the design requirem~nts and he referenced in the bid pabkage, conttact, or purcaase ordtr. 4.3 INSP~CTION AND TEST PLAN The bid package and resulting contract or purchase order will contain the requirement for inspection, test planning, and inspection documentation.

4. 4 1-'HOC:UHl~M~N'.I.' .JJOCUM_t;N'.1.' CON'l'h01 PLAN

    ;:-'.01.1monweal th Edison Conipr:iny, its contractors, sut>contr;:ictors, and suppliers will be responsible for their respective syste~s by which an appropriate review will determine that the require-ments of this section have been met.

OATE 12/1 /73_ (Rev .1) PAGE__.L_ OF _g__

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL 1 TITLE: QUALi TY REQUIREMENT

       ~HOCUREM~NT   DOCUM~NT  CONTROL                           Q.R. NO. 4.0 4.5  QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The bid package and resulting contract or purchase order will contain, as applicable, the requirement for the contractor quality assurance program, and will state the controls which will exist between the purchaser and seller in requesting and accepting changes under the purchase order or contract.

4.6 SPARE PARTS The procurement of spare parts is governed by Quality Require~ ment 7.0, Paragraph 7.7. 4.7 IMPLEMl!:NTING ~ROCEDUHBS

    ~uality   Procedure sections 4 and 7 provide the implementing procedures for this section. of the ~uality Requirements.
                                         "\~,\~~
                                          '--Manager) of Production DATE 12/1    - I.1-3 I_   (Rev.1) PAGE...;L_ OF_g__

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALITY REQUIREMENT INSTRUCTIONS,* PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS Q.R. NO. 5.0 5.1 GENERAL The quality assurance actions carried out for design, construc-tion, testing, and operation activities will be described in "*. documented instructions, procedures, drawings, specifications, or check lists. These documents will assist personnel in assuring that important activities have been performed. These documents will also reference applicable acceptance criteria which must be satisfied to assure that the quality related activity has been properly carried out. 5.2 SCOPE

   ~uality  Procedures will be written for the surveillance of de-sign, construction, testing, operations, maintenance, and repair activities. Where appropriate, these procedures will include check lists containing the necessary elements of operation to be observed or measured. These check lists will be used to the maximum extent practical to document the actions performed.

Maintenance and repairs to structures and equipment after con-struction and testing is completed are the responsibility of each ;:itation Maintenance ingineer and are performed in accordance with applicable drawings, procedures, instructions, and/or check lists. When Code work is involved, these documents shall be submitted to the Authorized Inspector for insertion of his hold points. Drawings, procedures, instructions, and/or check lists are used for maintenance and repairs outside the scope of normal station craft maintenance capability. When procedures and/or check lists are not available for work out-side the scope of normal station maintenance craft capability, an outline of the steps to be followed will be prepared to assure proper completion and testing of the maintenance or repair work. These procedures and/or check lists or outlines are supplemented as necessary by instructions from the personnel responsible for directing the specific maintenance or repair work.

   ~ach Station Superintendent or his designee is also responsible
   ;or preparation of procedures to assure the safe operation and refueling of the Station in accordance with requirements of the A~C operating l~cense. The Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems provides direction for the preparation of necessary instructions and procedures to accomplish the Station activities in a uniform and systematic manner.

DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev. 1 ) PAGE -1O F _ 2 ..

e Commonwealth Edison Company

                    . QUALITY       ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE:                                                     QUALi TY REQUIREMENT.

INSTRUCTIONS, PROC~DURES AND DRAWINGS Q.R. NO. __.5_._o_ __ 5.3 rt~S~ON~IBILITY

      ~uality    Procedures and instructions supplementing the Procedures of the ~uality Assurance Manual generally will be prepared, reviewed, and approved within the individual ~epartments, Generating Stations and Construction Sites responsible for the activities involved as the need arises and be controlled by
      ~uali ty Assurance Administration.

• Any Commonweal th Edison ~*

Company departmental group may propose procedures as necessary to meet regulatory or code requirements. i'he procedures will be independently reviewed and evaluated by otner involved departments with interface responsibilities and the comments forwarded to the issuing department. Quality rrocedures for ~ngineerinr and Construction will be reviewed by. the ~uperintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems and for Operations by thP. Manager of ~uality Assurance. e ~.4 IMPLEM.c..N'l'ING PROCEDURES Sections 2 and 5 of the Quality Procedures contain the imple-

     *menting procedures for this section of the .Quality Requirements.

DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev* 1 ) PAGE--2.. OF_~-

• C,Qmmonwealth Edison Company QOALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL QUALi TY REQUIREMENT DOCuMENT CONTROL Q.R. NO. 6 *0 6.1. GENERAL A system will be Jsed to assure that documents such as specifica-tions, procedures, and drawings are reviewed .for adequacy and
• approvedcfor release by authorized personnel. Such documents will be distrib~ted to and used at the locations where the pre-scribed activit;/*is performed. Changes to these documents will be handled similarly.

Documentation.Control will identify design documents, provide a schedule for completion, define design milestones or other control points, and identify design responsibilities with particular atterition to the definition of organizational inter-

    . faces. Design documents will include drawings, equipment specifications, work instructions, and test procedures necessary to obtain proper procurement, installation, start-up and opera-tion of systems and co~ponents in a~cordance with engineering requirements.~ Document control will include requirements for materials,* fabrication, special processes, testing, inspection, cleaning, packaging, shipping, storage, maintenance, refueling, operations, and plant m6difications.

6. 2 DISTRIBUTION .

     ~ distiibuti6n list for the documents. involved will be used and will designate recipients of document copies. This listing
    .shall include document changes, distributions for comment, and/or distributions for use.

6.3 CONTROL St~tus reports will be issued periodically, listing the latest revision of documents to assist recipients in maintaining up-to-d& te files. ~ach recipient on the distribution list will be required to maintain an up-t6-date file of the issued documents, ~- pertaining to his area of responsibility, in accordance with

     ~uality rtequirement 17.0, "Quality Assurance Records".

6.4 RESPONSIBILITY fhe Mechanical and ~tructural ~ngineering Department Project

     ~ngineer   har> the responsihili ty to establish document control procedures and methods during design, construction, pre-onerational and start-up testing, and plant modifications.

DATE 12 /1 /73 (Rev* 1) PAGE_L OF .2.._

e e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALITY REQUIREMENT DOCUlvU.:NT CONTROL Q. R. NO. 6. 0 6.4 h~::>l'ONSIBILITY (Cont'd) The Station Superintendent has the responsibility to establish document control procedures for operation, refueling, maintenance, and repair. The Station Office Supervisor maintains the station files for controlled documents. Superseded documents retained for reference are so marked. The Station Maintenance and Station Instrument ~ngineers assure tne lat.est revisions of documents for maintenance and repair are in their working files. The Technical 0taff Supervisor will incorporate changes to maintenance and operating criteria into station procedures and instructions in a timely manner.

     ~he ~tation Construction Department Contractor or Production
     ~ngineer, whichever has prime responsibility for the modification, shall collect and retain the inspection and test documents durinp:

construction and installation of assigned plant modifications. 6.5 IMP1~Ml!;NTING PROCEDURES 9

     ~uality   Assurance Manual distribution and revisions are controllerl in accordance with Quality Requirement Section 2 and design documents are distributed in accordance with Section 6. Upon completion of construction the completed construction and test procedures are transferred to the Station Superintendent in accordance with ~u~lity Procedure Section 6 *
          .oY:/{)~~ jt-z.t*i~s         *--~ ....

rlanager of i.;!uali ty Assurance DATE 12/1 /73 .* (Rev .1) PAGE_£_ OF _1_

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUAl.dTY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, QUALi TY REQUIREMENT 1 AND SERVICES Q. R. NO. __.7._..__o___ 7.1 GENERAL Contractors and suppliers furnishi~g material, equipment, and services to Commonwealth Bdison Company for items within the jurisdiction of this ~uality Assurance Manual will be selected on the basis of demonstrated capability to provide a product, process, or service in accordance with the design specifications and contract provisions, The purpose of this Quality Requirement is to define the quality system elements and related policies which assure the quality of purchased material, equipment, and services through the evalua-tion of supplier, surveillance of their operations, required source inspection, documentation, receiving inspection, and retention of quality records. The cognizant Engineering Project Engineer in conjunction with

     ~uality Assurance will require a quality assurance pro~ram in accordance with ANSI N45.2 and/or ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel
   . Code Section III from vendors. or contractors consistent with the importance of the procurement to station safety and operation*

and the requirements of ASME Section III. Control and approval of subcontractors quality assurance programs, procedures, and personnel qualification, are the responsibility of the specific contractor involved. Such contractor actions are to be documented and will be subject to audit by Commonwealth Edison Company, 7.2 EVALUATION OF SUPPLIERS An evaluation of supplier capability will be required for ASME Section III and safety-related items. Where valid records of supplier capability and quality performance are not available to Commonwealth Edison Company, a survey of the supplier's facilities, capnbilities and quality assurance system will be made by Commonwealth Edison Company or its desi~nated representative The Engineerinf, Department Quality Assurance Coordinator will be responsible for assuring that these vendor or contractor quality assurance program evaluations are carried out, DATE 12/1/73 (Rev .1) PAGE]-__ OF__!_

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, QUALi TY REQUIREMENT AND SERVICES Q.R. NO. 7.0 7.2 EVALUATION OF SUPPLIERS (Cont'd) In addition, Quality Requirement 9.0 of this manual, "Control of Special Processes", requires an evaluation and assessment of certain process and inspection capabilities such as welding, heat treatment, and nondestructive examination. 7.3 SOURCE SELECTION Past performance of a contractor/supplier will normally be considered during procurement activities by Commonwealth Edison Company. Prior to contract or purchase order award, the bidder's capability and quality performance will be reviewed relative to the product, process, or service being procured. If records are inadequate, a survey of the bidder's facilities prior to award may be required. Such surveys will include, as applicable, review of facilities, organization, quality assurance program and experience, existing controls, knowledge of special processes, possession of a current ASME Certificate of Authoriza-tion, and an understanding of, and a willingness to meet contract or purchase order requirements. *

• 7.4 SURVEILLANCE OF SUPPLIER OPERATIONS Source surveillance will be a requirement of the purchase order for safety related and/or ASMB Section III items when:

a) Determination of conformance of the item to purchase order requirements at any other point would require uneconomic disassembly or destructive testing. b) Special instruments, gauges, or facilities required for inspection or test are more readily available at source and would be uneconomic to reproduce at the job site. c) A receiving inspection would destroy or require replace-ment of special preservation and packing. d) ~uality controls and inspections are integrated into production methods, and inspection at the suppliers plant is necessary to economically verify test reports, in-spection records, certifications or other evidence of quality. DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev.1)PAGE_?__ OF_!__

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, QUALi TY REQUIREMENT I AND SERVICES Q.R. NO. 7.0 7.4 SURVEILLANCE OF SUPPLIER OPERATIONS (Cont'd) Presence of source surveillance by Commonwealth Edison Company or its agents will not nullify the supplier's responsibility. for maintaining a quality control organization delivering quality articles. Unless otherwise specified, acceptance by Commonwealth ~dison Company will be at the nuclear ~enerating station site in accord~nce with the terms of the contract. Unless otherwise specified, surveillance of off-site suppliers will be the responsibility of the Station Construction Depart-ment. 7.5 RECEIVING INSPECTION Materials and articles received from suppliers will be subject to inspection upon receipt. Documented evidence* of inspection will show conditLon of equipment as received and indicate compliance with the procurement requirements. Evidence that material or equipment conforms to procurement requirements must be documented, retained, and available at the site prior to use or installation. This evidence shall be in the form of complete documentation or a letter of compliance * . Documentation require-ments will be delineated in the individual equipment specifica-tions. The Station Construction Materials Receiving Coordinator or designee will be responsible for assuring thnt receivin~ inspection is completed. Nonconforming equipment will be controlled in accordance with Quality Requirement Q.R. 15.0, "Nonconforming Materials, Parts or Components." 7.6 SUPPLI~R AUDIT Suppliers of safety related and/or ASME Section III items will be subjected to survey, audit or surveillance of their quality assurance system by Commonwealth Edison Company, or its a~ents, at intervals consistent with the importance, complexity, and quantity of the product or services to assure that the necessary manufacturing processes are being.utilized and that quality controls are beine m~intained. Audits will be conducted in accordance with (..! * .it. 18, "Audits". DATE 12/1/73 (Rev.1) PAGE_l_ oF_i__

• Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, QUALi TY REQUIREMENT AND SERVICES Q.R. NO. 7.0

  *. 7.7    SPARE PARTS Spare parts will be purchased to original or better design re-quirements. The applicable quality assurance requirements will be included in the procurement documents.

Spare parts and equipment from suppliers and equipment manu-

            .facturers will require documentation by equipment or part number for identification and traceability. Documentation for material will be in accordance with procurement order requirements. When the procurement order for ASME Section III components and safety related spare parts, material, and equipment includes a specifica-tion or drawing, documentatton _:will be received from the Vendor which verifies conformance wit~. those requirements.

The Station Storekeeper is responsible. for assuring that the documentation for spare parts and equipment is inc.Luded as part of the shipment. The documentation for the purchased material,

           *equipment, and/or services will be ;retained at the station.

When required documentation is lacking for safety related and/or

       - ASME Section III components or spare parts, the Technical Staff Supervisor will assure that appropri~te _documentation is ob~ained or that suitable inspection and testing is performed to verify .

conformance to procurement requirements. Receip~ inspection _of

         **spare parts and equipment purchased to ASME Section III req':1ire-inents shall be assured by the Station Quality Assurance Engip.eer.

7.8 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Sections 4, 7, and 8 of the Quality Procedures are the implementing procedures for this section of the Quality Requirements. APPROVED BY: ~~-11-u-73

• anager of Quality **

Assurance DATE 2/4/74 (Rev. 2) PAGE__!_ OF_i__

• Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL

.e TITLE: IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF.' MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. _s_._o___ 8.1 GENERAL A system of controls .will be exercised to prevent the use of nonconforming items or items which have not received the required inspections and tests. Materials, parts, components, and equipment wiJl have their identity marked on the item or on tags and records troceable to the item. Identific~tion assipned to materials, parts and components will be maintained throughout fabrication, installation or erection and use of the item. The identification system will be established by the Mechanical and Structural Engineering Department with assistance from the Station Electrical Engineering Department, Architect Engineer and Nuclear Steam Suppiy Syste~ vendor as needed. 8.2 IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Assigned identification of materials, parts and components will be unique to the item. Identification will be on the item where practicable, and/or on records traceable. to the item. During fabrication, installation, erection and us~ of items, identification will he maintained tni.ceable to the documenta-tion of subcompon~rits and/or materials when specified. Engineering review will establish that stamps, tags, or labels affixing identification to an item will not affect the properties or otherwise cause deterioration of the item and that stamps, tags and labels shall be made of material that will assure identification is not lost. The identification systems used by Commonwealth Edison Company, its contractors and major suppliers for a nuclear generating station will be integrated to the extent necessary for uniformity. 8.3 CONTROL OF ITEJV!S The identity established by this requirement will generally be applied during the design phase. The p~ocurement of items and components will use this identity and it will be maintained during fabrication performed by vendors and in accordance with Quality Requirement 4.0, "Procurement Document Control." The receiving inspection, erection, repair and maintenance records of engineered items and components which are filed at the construction site or Statipn will be traceable to the DATE 12/1/73 (Rev* 1) PAGE__j_ OF 2-

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL .9,---.-----------------------------,--------~------. TITLE: IDENTIFI~ATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS, Ql:JALITY REQUIREMENT PAHT.S AND COMPONENTS Q.R. NO. 8.0 8.3 CONTROL OF ITEMS (Continued) engineering identity in accordance with Quality Requirement 10.0, "Inspection." Items and components which have not been subjected to required inspection and tests prior to receipt will be tagged or marked and controlled in accordance with Quality Requirement 14.0, "Inspection, Tes~ and Operating Status." Nonconforming items will be identified and controlled in accordance with a Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Requirement 15.0, governing nonconforming material, parts or components. 8.4 REPLACEMENT PARTS AND MATERIALS Replacement parts and materials will be similarly identified by coded part numbers during purchase, storage, and installa-tion to assure required traceability to records and documents. Multiple parts with identical configuration are individually coded. Part numbers are assigned by the Production-Maintenance Inventory Control Group. 8.5 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Section 8 of the Quality Proc~dures is the implementing procedure for this section of the Quality Require~ents. DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev* 1) PAGE~ OF .2_

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: tONTROL OF SPEC~AJ PROCESSES QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. _9..__.o_ __ 9.1 GENER.AL For some processes, the required level of quality defined in applicable codes, standards, and specifications cannot be assured by inspection of the itern alone. Fcir these processes, quality assurance is obtained through reliance on personnel qualification and procedural controi. These special processes include welding, heat treating, coating, plating, material cleaning and bonding, chemical processes, certain nondestruc-tive testing processes, and such additional processes th:::it may be identified in the contract or purchase order, as the result of ASME Section III requirements and/or design review. Procedures for the control of special processes will be maintained for components within the primary system pressure boundary and other safety related and/or ASME Section III desiv,nated boundaries. These procedures will be in accordance with applicable codes and specifications.

9. 2 PROC2DURE OU!J .. IFICATIC!i~ M;D CONTROL Process control procedures will be used as required by applic8ble specificAtions, codes, or standards. Supplemental procedures will be pre.pa.red. as.necessary to provide detailed performance and methods for control of special processes. Process control procedures.will specify the preparatory steps, processing details, conditions t') be maintained during the steps of the process, inspection and test requirements, and records require-ments. Process control procedures will be submitted to Commonwealth Edison Company for review and evaluation in accordance with documented Commonwealth Edison Company proce-dures. Process control procedures* will specify the methods of verifying the adequacy of processing materials, solutions, and equipment, including.definitions of their associated control parameters. When the process is conducted in special environ-ments, such as in vacuum or inert gases, the process control procedures will specify the requirements and methods for maintaining such environm*ents.

The control and approvRl of sub-vendor Quality Assurance and Quality Control procedures nre the responsibility of the specific contractor involved (includes NSSS vendor) *. DATE 12/1/73 (Rev .1) PAGE_L__ OF .2._

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL. - - TITLE: CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES QUALITY REUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 9.0 9.2 PROCEDURE QUALIFICATIO~ AND CONTROL (Continued) Control procedures for nondestructive examination processes such as radiography, ultrasonic testihg, liquid penetrant in~pection, and magnetic particle inspection; will be used by CECo and their contractors to assure that the results provide accurate, uniform and reproducible indications of actual quality.

• PERSCN~El. QUALIFICATI0N AND CERTIFICATION Commonwealth Edison Company and contractor personnel responsible for the performance and verification of special processes will be certified as required by applicable specifications, codes, and standards. Certification of personnel for these processes will include necessary training followed by an examination of
• each individual. The period of validity for certifications shall be specified, and each individual shall be recertified at the end of such a period by retesting. Personnel failing retest shall be removed from operations pending recertification.

Training, testingi and certificatio~ of personnel shall be in accordance with criteria described j_6 applicable codes, standards, and specifications. 9.4 PROCESS CONTROL RECORDS Process control records will provide objective evidence that special processes were performed in compliance with approved process control procedur~s by qualified personnel. Process records will specify the inspection and test data to be verified in accordance with Quality Requi~ement 10.0 "Inspec-tion" and 11 . 0, "Test Control." Results of nondestructive exa~inations will be recorded in accordance with applicable specifications, codes and standards. These records will be re~ained by Commonwealth Edison Company or when the work is contracted, they will be retained by the vendor and then supplied to Commonwealth Edison Company as required by procurement documents.

9. 5 RESPC N'.'.)IBILITY 1

During construction and assigned plant modifications, the responsibility for implementation of special process proce-dures is thAt of Station Construction and shall be under the DATE 12/1/73 (Rev.1) PAGE~ OF~

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL .e TITLE: CONTROL OF SPECIAL.. PROCESSES QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 9.0 9.5 RESPONSIBILITY surveillance and audit control of the Supervisor of Quality Assurance or the Site Quality Assurance Coordinator. During station operation, the Production Maintenance Engineer assembles and maintains the qualified procedures used by

        ~tation mairitenance'personnel or contr~ctor. Persons performing such sp~cial processes shall be qualified in accordance with the requirements of the applicable codes ~nd specifications.

Implementation of procedures during operations is audited by the Station Maintenance Engineer and Station Instrument Engineer or their designee. Completion of inspection, tests, and audits is verified by the Station Quality Assurance Engineer. 9.6 IhPLEMENTING FH.OCEDURES Section 9 of the Quality Procedures contain the implementing procedures for this section of the Quality Requirements. Approved By DATE 12/1/73 (Rev* 1) PAGE..2.._ OF _l_

. e l TITLE: INSPECTION Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL QUALITY PROCEour*-. Q. P. NO. 1 o. o 10.1 GENERAL Inspection Programs by Stat~on Construction will be established to provide assurance that the quality control surveillance, inspec - tions, and tests defined in the npplicahle equipment specifications are performed. Quality Assurance inspection and testing will be conducted to verify conformance to applicable drawings, ir.str11cti0ns, And procedures. _In addition, in-service inspection will be carried out in confor~ance with requirements of AS~E ~ection XI. Inspection and test control points, to bP. witnessed by the Authorized Inspector, .Commonwealth Edison Company or its representative, will be est8blished as required to assure quality of i terns and effective;iess of the inspection pror:rar.;s. The individual performing inspections shall be independent of the individual directly responsible for performing the specific activity. The person who has first level manAgement responsibility for the specific task shall not perform inspec~ i tions. Higher level associated personnel with broad manAge-ment responsibilities ~ay b~ responsible for inspections, but the preferred procedure shall be to use other*independent, technically qualified personnel, as assigned, to perform the inspections. 10.2 INSPECTION AND TEST PLAN An inspection and test plan will be prepared for the items specified,. either as a separate document identified with the parts, components, or assemblies; or as an integral part of work. instruction documents. The inspection and test plan will consist of a flow chart~ diagram, or narrative descrip-tion of the sequence of procuremen_t, fabrication, processinr;, assembly, inspection and test activities, and shall specify the inspection points. The inspection and test plan will provide testing requirements,* the characteristics to be measured, the inspecti.on and test procedures, and the applicable acceptance criteria. The criteria for selection of testing met~ods will be to verify design requirements. Sampling inspection methods may be used when tests are destructive or when the qu8lity records and the inherent inspection characteristics of th~ item indicate that a reduction in inspection or testing can be achieved without jeopardizing the assurance of quality. Samplin~ methods require 1:irior approval of the Commonweal th Edison Comp;rny or its representative as required by contract. The importance, relative complexity, point of acceptance, and quantity of items will determine whether items will be inspected at source or upon receipt. Source inspection is to be utilized

                                           . DATE 12/1 /73  (Rev.1) PAGE~ OF~-

• Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL

 - TITLE:
   - -INSPECTION
            - - - - - - - - - - - . -QUALITY                  - -PROCEDURE Q. P. NO. 1 o.o 10.2   INSPECTION AND TEST PLAN (Continued) under the same criteria as source surveill8nce with the additional requirement that there are control points in the contractor/

supplier's manufacturing plan which must be identified for notification to Commonwealth Edison C6mpany or its agents prior to proceeding with manufacture. Items which hRve been inspected at source will also require sufficient receiving inspection to assure that itemE are not damaged in shipment. ~ Certification of chemical and phyiical properties or laboratory verification of materials will be required when indicated by applicable codes and ~tanda.rds, by design requirements, or as stated *in the procurement documents. In--process and final inspections anq tests will be used to assure conformance to design requirements for fabrication and construction work. 10.3 PROCEDURES Written procedures or check lists will be used to specify and verify final inspections and test~. Changes to approved procedures will be documented and will be reviewed for approval by personnel with equivalent engineering and quality assurance technical competence as the personnel that established the procedure. The Authorized Inspection Agency shall review and. concur with the procedure changes when ASME Section III work is involved. 10.4 STANDARDS Where samples of acceptable work (workmanship samples) are to be used as criteri& for acceptance or rejection, the samples will be selected, identified, and controlled under the same approval authority as requirP.d for inspection and test proce-dures. 10.5 RECORDS REQUIREMENTS Inspection and test records will provide objective evidence th~t inspections and tests were performed in compli8nce with instructions and procedures to verify design requirements. Inspection and test results will be recorded to show conform-ance with acceptance criteria and/or record and identify the cause of rejected items. Inspection and test records will ideptify the inspector or recorder. DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev. 1 ) PAGE~ OF~

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: INSPECTION QUALi TY REQUIREMEN"1 Q.R. NO. ~10~*~0-----~- 10.6 INSPECTION CONTROL Inspection and testing will be performed in accordance with documented instructions, procedures and/or plans. The control of purchased material, equipment, anrt services will be conducted in accordance with Quality Requirement 7.0, "Control of Purchased Material, Equipment, and Services." The receiving inspection function at the sife will process acceutatle items to storage or end use. Nonconforming items will be j.dentified, segregated, and disposed of in accordance with Quality Requirements 14.0, Inspection, Test, and Operating Status, and 15.0, "Nonconforming Materials, Parts, or Components." Appropriate corrective action(s) will be initiated and accomplished in accordance with Quality Requirement 16.0, "Corrective Action." Data and results will be recorded when specified and copies distributed in accord:1nce with the applicable procedure. Personnel performin~ inspections and tests will be identified

     .on the report.

Rework, repair, or replacement performed after completion of inspection tests will req1iire reinspection and retest to the extent necessary to establish acceptability to the original criteria. 10.7 RESPONSIBILITY For activities affecting quality at supplier's facilities and construction at the site, the Supervisor of Quality Assurance or the Site Quality Assurance Coordinator will verify that inspection .procedures are established and executed. The Station Construction Department shall be responsible for the execution of such inspection by the contr~ctors in accordance with such procedures. The Qualj.ty Assurance Supervisor or Coordinator shall be responsible for independent testing and inspection activities performed directly for CECo. For plant modifica~ions directed either by Station Construction or Station personnel, the Station Maintenance Engineer with the assistance of the Station Quality Assurance Engineer will verify that inspections performed at the station are in accordance with the engineering design quality control inspec-tion and testing criteria. An assiened Station Construction Engineer may perform this verification with the assistance* of the Station Quality Assurance Engineer or the Site Quality Assurance Supervisor or Coordinator. DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev .1) PAGE_i_ OF__!!._

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: INSPECTION QUALi TY REQUIREMEl*IT Q.R. NO. 10.0 10.7 RESPONSIBILITY (Continued) The cognizant Station Technical Staff Supervisor with the assistance of the Station Quality Assurance Engineer will verify that inspection during station operation, outages, and In-Service Inspection program required by the Tech~ical Specification is carried out in accordance with approved procedures and/or check lists. - 10.8 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Sections 7, 8, and 10 of the Quality Procedures are the implementing procedures for this section of the Qu~lity Requirements. Approved By

              ~
             .~QU8ly Assurance j(-~/ -?~

anc:i.ger DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev.1) PAGE~ OF_4_

          .

• Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: TEST CONTROL QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 11.0 11 .1 GENl~RAL Test pror;rams will be established to assure that design and performance criteria h~ve been satisfied. The test programs will include, as apprcipri8.te, procedures to evaluate structures, systems, subsystems, and components. The program will include, as applicable, proof tests prior to installation,. construction, preoperation, and start~up tests as required for a new plant, and operational tests, as well as *those tests applicable following plant maintenance or modifications.

11 . 2 TE.3T PROCEDURES Written test procedures will be developed to demonstrate de~ign and performance characteristics as specified in design and operating requirements. The procedures will include provisions for assuring that prerequisites have been completed and state the data to be obtained. The tests will be performed under the appropriate conditions using approved and calibrated test equipment in accordanc~ with Quality Requirement 12.0, "Control of Measuring and Test Equipment."

• Data will be examined frequently as each test proceeds, and*

out-of-tolerance conditions will be recorded and described in adequate detail to permit post-test analysis. Equipment failures and malfunctions will be reported in accordance with Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Require-ment 15.0 governing nonconforming items. Appropriate corrective action ~ill be carried out and documented per Quality Requirement No*. 16. 0, "Corrective Action." 11.3 TEST EVALUATION Test results will be evaluated following each test to assure conformance with design and performance requirements. The evaluation will determine the following: I o That the appropri8te test procedure was used *

2. That the data displays the adequacy of the equipment to meet the specified requirements.

3. That nonconforming or incident conditions, if applicable, are reported*and corrected.

DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev. 1 ) PAGE..1.__ OF~

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: TEST CONTROL QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q. R. NO. 11

• o 11.3 TEST EVALUATION Test data that has been reviewed *following the test and found to meet or exceed the requirements will be accepted by a responsible person and the action documented.

Test data that does not meet the requirements will be recorded and, if necessary, reported in accordnnce with Quality Require-ment 15, "Nonconforming Materials~ Parts, or Components." The appropriate.corrective action will be carried out and documented in accordance with Quality Requirement No. 16, f "Corrective Action."

11. I+ RECORDS REC::UIREMENTS Test records will include instrument calibration data and djta sheets completed during the tests~ The data sheets will have provisions for identifying the person responsible for conducting the test and the qate or period the test was performed.

The original test records shall be reviewed for completeness, identified, and indexed to establish them as part of a permanent retard to be retained for review. 11.5 RESPOKSIBILITY The responsibility for writine, review and approval of procedures, the evaluation of test results and the documenta-tion is set forth in the Quality Procedure qesignated for the particular.type of te~:;t, (e.g., construction, preopera-tional, start-up and operational tests). The Authorized Inspector sha1.l have the opportunity to establish his hold points prior to the approval of the test procedures written for the tests required by the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III. 11.6 IMPLEViENTING PROCEDUHES Section 11 of the Quality Procedures contains the implementing ~~ procedures for this section of the Quality Requirements .

                                                    .**-)

.Approved By DATE 12/1./73 (Rev.1) PAGE_g__ OF~

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. _1....,.2............ 0 __ 12.1 GENF.RAL Measuring and test equipment which is used to determine the acceptability of materials, parts, components, fabricated items, and completed construction assemblies, and to.perform the preoperational testing and to ascertain the proper indica-tions in the operation of generating station equipment will be periodically calibrated or adjusted to assure that accuracy is maintained within necessary limits in order to verify design requirements.

12. 2 CAJ .IBRATION REQUIREMENTS Inspection, measuring and test equipment will be calibrAted 8t scheduled intervals against certified standards having known valid relationships to recognized standards. Calibration intervals for items will be based upon the type of equipment, accuracy, use and other conditions affecting measurement control.

Commonwealth Edison or their contractors and vendors may provide calibrations of ~easuring nnd test equipment, or use the services of an approved standards 12boratory. In either case, approved standard procedures will be used for calibra-tion work*- .Standard~~ will be maintained and used in an environment with temperature, humidity and cleanliness controls compatible with maintaining accuracy and operating cn;ojr::icteristics of the standards. H.istory records for rneri.surinr~ and test equipment will be used to ind icote ,cal i bra ti on status, condition, correction to be applied and repair events.

     ~raceability     record$ will be maintained for certified standards to show that their calibrations are traceable to recognized n8tional standards. The records will be maintained by Commonwealth Edison for company standards as well as calibration records for inspection, measuring and test equip-me:1t. Reputable commercial. laboratories shall be employed when needed and their standHrds will be traceable to recog-nized national standards.

DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev.1) PAGE_j__ oF_?__

           .e       Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY       ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT           QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 12.0 12 .4 EQUIPMENT CONTROL Items of measuring and test equipment will be labeled or tagged to show calibration status, including due date of the next calibration for use, in accordance with Quality Requirement 10.0, "Inspection," and 11.0, "Test Control." Equipment thnt h8s not been properly maintained or calibrated in accordance with specified sche~ules will be identified. The Station Maintenance Department (or cognizant Station Construction Engineer dufin~ construction) will be notified for immediate corrective action. Written procedures appropriate to the item(s) of measuring and test equipment involved will be used to specify preoperations, checks, environmental requirements, stepwise instructions for use, and instructions for shutdown and layaway.

The Operational Analysis Department will be responsible for calibration and maintenance of Commonwealth Edison Company measuring and test equipment. Assistance in this activity will be obtained from qualified vendors or laboratories as necessary. The Station Instrument Engineer is responsible for the periodic calibration and adjustment of tools, gauges, instruments, and testinf; devices-within specified tolerances during station operation as well as documentation of such calibration and ad;justment.

12. 5 IMfJLLMI*:NTINC PROCEDUHE:S Section 12 of the Uuality Procedures contains the implementing procedures for this section of the Quality Requirements.

Approved By DATE 1 ?./1 /73 (Rev* 1 ) PAGE-'-.. OF __L

• Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL

---~~~~~~~~-----r~~~--, TITLE: HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHIPPING QUALITY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 13.0

13. 1 GEl\J F'.:RAL Written instructions for handling, preserv;:ition, storage, and shipping will be used to specify special protective conditions ne6essary to prevent damage or deterioration of materials and equipment. The requirements needed to provide adequate receipt of material and equipment are established by Engineering in the equipment specifications or vendor instructioris.

13.2 HANDLING Special handling instructions will be provided for items that are susceptible to handling damage. Durinr, fabrication, processing, construction, modifications, or installation, special c~rts, cranes, boxes, containers, and transportation vehicles will be uti~ized as necessary to prevent damage due to handling. Construction installation, and test sites will be provided Copies of special handling instructions as appropriate. 13~3 PRESERVATION Instruction8 for preservation will be provided for items subject to deterio~ation or darnGge through exposure to air, moisture, or other environments during fabrication, processing, assembly, and. interim storar;e pc~riods. Items wil 1 be cleaned and preserved by such methods as re~uired to preclude deterioration. Items subject to dama~e w~ll be packaged in a manner and with such mat~rials as re111ired tc prevent damage. When maintenance of specific internal or external. environments are necessary, these will be included in special packaging instructions.

13. 4 . STORAGE For i:ems which are required to be stored for *long periods of time, storage instructions will specify special protective environments necessary to prevent deterioration and damage.

Instructions will provide for adequate safety, maintenan6~ of ;.;reservation, periodic inspection, and*periodic accounta-bility. 13.5 SHIPFI~G CONTROL Vendor's Quality Program will include shipping procedures which will provide for inspection and control of items leaving the supplier's plant to assure the following: DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev .1) PAGE..J_ OF _l_

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHIPPING QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q.R. NO. 13~0 13.5 SHIPPING CONTROL (Continued)

a. Items have been subjected to and have satisfactorily passed applicable inspections and tests.

b. Items are complete and assembled as required.

c. Items have been preserved and* packaged in accordance with applicable procedures and contract requirements.

d. Packaged items have been identified and marked in accordance with applicable procedures and specifications.

e. In the absence of packing and marking requirements in the contract or subcontract, the packing and marking of items will be such as to be readily identifiable at destination.

f. Items shipped from.fa vendor will be accompanied with necessary shipping documents including special handling and storage instructions, if required.

13.6 RESPONSIBILITY During construction, the Station Construction and Quality Assurance Groups shall provide surveillance of on-site rec~ipt handling arid storage of material and equipment. The Station Construction Department, however, shall have prime responsibility for this activity. After licensing, when performing plant modif~cations, the . assigned Station Construction Department En~ineer will ~rovide surveillance of handling, storage, and receipt of materiaL and equipment for plant modification. The Station Storekeeper controls such special handling and storage of station and other assigned spare .parts, material, and equipment in accordance with supplier instructions. ir,:' .DATE _2_/_4-'-/..:..74..;.___(Rev. 2 );,AGE..L. OF _l_

_ .* e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHtPPING QUALi TY REQUIREMENT Q:R. NO. 13.0

13. r( PHOCEDURES Section 13 of the Quality Procedures contains the implementing procedures for this section of the Quality Requirement's.

2< _ -.... DATE 12 /1 /73 . (Rev. 1 ) PAGE_l_ OF_l__

• Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALi TY REQUIREMENT HISPECTION, TEST., AND OPERATING STATUS Q.R. NO. 1.4.0 14.1 (;ENE.ltAL The status of material, equipment, or. systems will be established with the use. of forms and tags during construction and operation phases of the nuclear generatinf. station. This system of control will provide for the identification of items which have sati&factorily met* required inspections and tests prior to arrival at the construction site *. This system will also provide

    *for indicating the quality or operating status during construc-tion and plant operations.

14.2 STATUS IDBNTIFICATION The system of identifyinp, the status of material, equipment, or systems is as follows: 14.2.1 RECEIVING AND STORAGE Material Receiving and Inspection report forms will be used to indicate the physical condition and conformance to specification. 14.2.2 CONSTRUCTION STATUS Systems and components will be tagged upon receipt and during construction to indicate their status as to receipt, installation, and test. This card will be light blue with black letters. 14.2.3 NON-CONFORMING MATEH~A~ AND EQUIPMENT Material and equipment which does not conform to specification will be identified through the use

                ~f quality assurance tags. A yellow, Qu~lity Assurance. "HOLD" tag with black letters will identify hon-conforming equipment or questionable material until its.quality status is resolved.

14.C:.4 UNACCBPTABLE K~TERlAL AND EQUIPMENT When material or equipment is determined to be of unacceptable quality, it will be identified with a red Quality Assurance "R,C;J.8CT" tag. Additionally, this information* will be documented on non-conformance and material receiving and inspection reports. DATE 12/1/73 (Rev* 1) PAGE-1..... OF _L.

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALi TY REQUIREMENT INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS Q.R. NO. i. 4 .o . 14.2.5 PRODUCTION STATUS When a system or component under the jurisdiction of the Production Department Load Dispatcher is taken out of service for any reason, it will be identified with the use of the Commonwealth Edison Company "HOLD" card. This card is orange in color. When generating station equipment or systems which are not under the jurisdic-tion of the Production Department Load Dispatcher are

                  . taken out of service for inspection, repair, or modification, they will be identified and controlled with the red Commonwealth Edison Company "OUT-OF-SERVICE" card.

14.-.:, STA'fUS CONTROL The methods of control will be provided through Construction and Station Operating Procedures which describe the use of forms, tags, and locging metuods. Cor.lmonwealth.:t;dison Company or its designated agent will resolve the condition initiating any tagging prior to construction tel3ting, pre-operational testing, or resumption of production operations. 14.4 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Sectibn 14 of the Quality Procedures contains the implementing

          ~rocedures for this section of the Quality Requirements.

i..r:-,c0Vc.D i>Y: ~ 1t-z1-7~ Manager of Coiua.li ty of Assurance on DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev* 1 ) PAGE2-. OF _J_

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALi TY REQUIRErvi:r ,-~ NONCONFORMING MATEB.IALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS Q.R. NO. 15 .o 15 .1 GENERAL ' ,J ' Items which are found nonconforming to drawings, specification requirements, or workmanshi.p *standards will be identified and controlled to prevent their ~nadverte~t 11se or installation. The disposition of items that cannot be brought into confofm-ance with design requirements will be determined after a technical evaluation.

15.2 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

ANUJSPOSITIO~ Technical Evaluation will be performe~ to determine whether a nonco.nforming i tern may be accepted "as-is", repaired to an acceptable condition, or whether the item nust be rejected. Item~ may be reworked to conform with design and/or specifica-tion requirements without Technical Evaluation. When items are accepted "as-is", Technical Evaluation will be performed to assure that the final condition of nonconforming items will not adversely affect safety, operability or maintainability of the items, or of the co~ponent or system in which it is installed. Personnel performing the Technical Evaluation will have com-petence equivalent to that of the engineering and quality assurance personnel who established the original design, *. inspection, and workmanship requirements. Teclinical Evaluation actions relating to nonconforming .i terrs will be documented. Such documentation will be' retain.:!d and wiJ.l be traceable to each item. 15.3 IDENTIFICATION AND CON~ROL Items which are found to nonconfurm.ing to desi.gh and specif.'ication requirements or workmanship standards wil.l be positively identified and uniquely ser,regated or handled as nonconforming to prevent their inadvertent use.' A Technical Evaluation by Commonwealth ~dison Company or its deslgnated agent(s) will determine whether (or under what conditions) the item can be used. Nonconforming items accepted "as-is or r~worked to an accept-able condition shall be identified through docum0ntation records and in a manner that wilJ,. establish the condition as installed. Hejected items shall be identified by taggine, immediately *

     ,removed from construction or installation areas (unless physical size prohibits this), segregated in a controlled area and re-turned to the vendor or pl~sically altered to prevent uncontrolled use or installation.

DATE 12/1 /73 . (Rev .1) PAGE-1_ QF_3_

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL ~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,---~~~-----:~ QUALi TY REQUIREME~.:-1 TITLE: NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR-- COMPONENTS Q.R. NO. 15.0 15.4 D~LEGATED REVIEW AUTHORITY Commonwealth Edison Company may delegate to certain of its contractors the authority to perform Technical Evaluation of nonconforming items under the contractor'3 direct control, where the contractor has an acceptable procedure for handling nonconforming i terns *. 'h7here such authority is deler:ated, "':he contractor is responsible for establishing that: 1) all actions fall within the requirements set by Commonwealth Edison Compan~, 2) any accepted nonconformity meets the design intent, and, 3) personnel performing the evaluation meet the require-ments of Par. 15.2. Commonwealth Bdison Company reserves the right to review qualificatjons of contrector personnel performing sueh evaluations. 15.5 SUPPLIER REQUEST FOR ~EVIEW ACTION When a contractor finds it necessary or desirable to utilize nonconforming items in the perf~rmance of his work or to submit such i terns to Commonweal th -~di.son Company with a request for acceptance, he is obligated to immediately inform Commonwealth Edison Company of the nature and extent of the nonconformity and the reason for proposing its use or installation. The contractor is required to exercise the necessary controls to identify and segregate the item from acceptable material and to withhold it from use pending Technical Bvaluation. When Technical ~valuation has not been delegated, Commonwealth Edison Company will make a Technical ~valuation of all per-tinent data rel&ting to the nonconformity, including the cause, where known, and the corrective action eithAr taken or planned to prevent recurrence. When the responsible Commonwealth ~dison Company personnel authorizes acceptance of the item "as-is", or rework of the nonconforming item, the action will be documented as required in Par. 15.3. Nonconformances involving vendor product prior to shipment to the site will be .identified in shipping documents or certificates of conformance. *

• 15.6 INCIDENTS Construction incidents are documented and reported to the Atomic.

       ~nergy   Commission and the executive management. The Station Construction Department Project Bngineer is responsible for this reporting. Damage to material or equipment is resolved in accordance with ~uality Procedure Section 15.

DATE 12/1/73 (Rev. 1 ) PAGE~ OF_l__

e Commonweatth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL

• 9--~~~~--~---------T-~~--~

TITLE: . QUALITY REQUIREMENT NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS Q.R. NO. 15.0

                                                                                 ' *I,! ....

• 15.6 INCIDENTS (Cont'd)

Operating incidents are documented and reported to the Atomic Energy Commission as required by the license. The. Station Superintendent is responsible for reporting and investigating incidents in accordance with Quality Procedure Section 15. Reports of incidents that result in damage or are otherwise

         *safety significant are reviewed with the Manager of Production, and forwarded to executive management.

15.7 OPERATING NONCONFORMANCES For any events where significant deviation from the accepted normal operation of a reactor and its associated equipment occurs, the Station Technical Staff investigate*s and issues a Deviation Report. These reports are reviewed for trends in the plant operation. The reports are distributed to the Superin-tendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems, Superintendents of Production, the Station Operating Engineers and Technical Staff Supervisor. The Maintenance Engineer receives a copy of the deviat,ion i f it involves maintenance work. Reports involving significant reactor safety considerations are reviewed with the* Manager of Production and forwarded to executive management. Such deviations will be reported to the AEC as required by the.operating license. 15.8 RESPONSIBILITY During construction and plant modification, the Mechanical and

         . Structural Engineering Department Project Engineer has re-sponsibility for resolution of nonconformances. He will be assisted by the Station Electrical Engineering Department Project Engineer .and Quality Assurance personnel as necessary.

Nonconformances t6 system operating and technical ~pecification requirements will be resolved.through actions by the cognizant* Oper~ting Engineer with the approval of the Station Superintendent. Jl5.9 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Section 15 procedures Manager of Quality

                           *Assurance.
                                          *DATE 2/4/74 (Rev. 21           OF--3...

e Commonwealth Edison Company QU~LITY ASSURANCE MANUAL

---

*----'"-o,.--------

TITLE: QUALITY REQUIREME:.~. CORRECTIVE ACTION Q.R. NO. 16.0 16.1 GENERAL A corrective ~ctio~ syetem will be used to assure that noncon-forming items and condit~ons which might affect the safe operation of of a nuclear generating station are identified and corrected. This sys te!11 will provide follow..,.up to a[; sure that corrective measures c:.re effectively implemented. Significant conditions and nonconforming items. will be reported to appro-priate levels of management. 16.2 RECORDING AND REPORTING Hecords will.be kept to identify:

1. Incidents (e.g.l major damage, personal injury, maj~r sch~dule delays;.

2. Nonconforming items in accordance with QuaJ.ity Hequire-ment 15.0, "Nonconforming Materials, Part8 or Companents".

3. Unfavorable conditions identified in Audit Reptirts in accordance with Quality Requirement 18.0, "Au.dits".

4. Equipment failures and malfunctions which occur during

           ~tation operation.

Heporting of nonconformities to management is not required for systems or components ff one of the following conditions are met:

1. The nonconformity is. ~ot an indication of a significant failure in any portion of the ~uality Assurance Program conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Commonwealth .t:dison Company l.(uality Assurance Manual.

2. The nonconformity is of a type that frequently occurs during design and construction of generating stations such as:

a. Minor incluuions, cracks, undercuts, or porousities, where ti1e rnagn.i tude or frequency or occurrence i:;

not indicative of a significant problem in design, proceaures, materials or workmanship.

b. Minor departures from specified physical or chemical properties of materials that do not require extensive evaluation to determine adequacy of the materials.

DATE 12 /1 /73 (Rev.1)pAGE_l__ oF_l__

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL .e TITLE: CORRECTIVE ACTION QUALi TY REQUIREM[N-Q. R. NO. 16.0 16.2 RECORDING AND REPORTING (Cont'd)

c. Minor structural departures from design requirements, such ~s low strength concrete or porousity 6f concrete provided tha~ an extensive evaluation is not r~quired to determine adequacy of the structure or reoairs.

d. Minor departures from performance specifications, as demonstrated by acceptance of construction and ore-operational tests, which do not require ex~e~sive evaluations of an item's performance capability or extensive redesign.

3. The nonconformance can and will be remedied through the use

               .of established methods in applicable codes or approved pro-cedures.

4. The item will have the capability of performing its intended function.

Copies of the noncon f ormance repor t s wi. 11 -L .*' sent to the Manager of Quality Assurance. 16.3 ANALYSIS OF R~CORDS Records will be regularly reviewed and analyzed:

a. To assure that the causes of nonconformities.*and the corrective actibn have been clearly described.

b. To assure that the overall effect resulting from the use of nonconforming items has been evaluated by authorized Commonwealth Edison Company personnel.

c. To determine whether corrective measures ~ill preclude recurrence.

16.4 REVIEW AND EVALUATION FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION Personnel performing the evaluation function are responsible for considering th~ cause and th~ feasibility of correcti.ve action to a~sure that the necessary quality of an item is not deteriorated. Where it is determined that the c~use cannot be corrected in a timely manner, the effective date of corrective action will be determined dur inf.~ the review and evaluation.

        ~valuation may indicate the need for inve~tigatioris to assure that corrective measures are considered complete. ~valuation may also indicate that the nature of the nonconformity is minor and does not require corrective action.

12/1/77) (RP.V .1) ..... ,or. ?

9 e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALi TY REQUIREMENT CORRECTIVE ACTION Q~R. NO. 16.0 16.5 CORRECTIVE ACTION CONTROL Site contractors and off-site vendors will be required to follow-up on Corrective Action commitments within their quality program.

       *The. Supervisor of Quality Assurance or the Site Quality Assurance Coordina,tor will be responsible for surveillance of site corrective action.

The Mechanical and Structural Engineering Department Project Engineer is iesponsible for assuring that review and ~valuation of nonconformance reports is carried out .to determine need of corrective action. r

• Required corrective action during Station operation which is due to equipment malfunctions and/or abnormal occurrences will be incorporated into the Station maintenance and operating pro-cedures in a timely manner to preclude repetition. The Quality Assurance Engineer assigned to the Station verifies the completion of corrective actions by the Station for deficiencies found bi the Off-Site audit, review and investigative function.

Deficiencies in implementing corrective actions will be brought to the attention of appropriate management levels for resolu-tion as part of the Quality Assurance Program in accordance with Quality Requirement 2.0, "Quality Assurance Program", Paragraph 2.3. 16.6 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Section 16 of the Quality Procedures contains the implementing procedures for this section of the Quality Requirements. APPROVED BY:~ //-z/-73 '* Manager of Quality Assurance DATE 2 / 4 /7 4 (Rev. 2) PAGE__i_ OF-2......

0 Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALi TY REQUIREMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS Q.R. NO. 17,0

                                                                              ;*/'.I..

17 .1 GENERAL

     ~uality  program documentation is specified in the Quality Pro-cedures contained in the Commonwealth Edison Quality Assurance Manual. Fabrication and construction documentation is generated by contractors and suppliers for Commonwealth Edison Company, and will be available at the construction site or as directed by procurement documents. When records are stored at locations other than the site, a record ~ill be maintained at the site to identify these records and their location* (e.g., NSSS equipment documentation). Records generated during site testing, opera-tions, and plant modifications will be available at the plant site.

17.2 RESPONSIBILITY The ~uality Assurance Administrator will be responsible for assuring the retention of rec-0rds during the engineering, con-st~uction, and assigned plant modification periods. Following start-up, the Superintendent of Nuclear and Fossil Systems will be responsible for assuring the retention *of records for the* life of the plant or for the period of time specified by Commonwealth Bdison Company_ ~uality ~rocedures. 17.3 R~COHD REQUIREMENTS

     ~uality  records will be received, evaluated, stored, and re-trievable to:

17.3.l Provide Commonwealth .r;dison Company and the Authorized Inspector the inspection and test results and/or certifications required by codes, specifications, purchase documents, and construction contracts. These r~cords, supplemented by vendor and field inspections, will provide Commonwealth Edison Company assurance that the items obtained and/or delivered comply with the specified requirements. 17.3.2 Provide a niGtorJcal record of the fabrication, in-stallatio11, erection, modification, and operation of a generatj_ng station to Commonwealth Bdison Company for future use. 17.3.3 Verify proper fabrication/installation of ASME Section III components and systems.

                                     *'DATE 12/1 /73  (Rev .. ,) PAGE__l_ or _j_

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUAL..ITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALi TY REQUIREMENT

             ~UALITY ASSURANC~     RECORDS                    Q.R. NO. 17 .o 17.4  QUALI~Y R~~UIR~M.b:NTS      DOCUMBNTATION Typical quality assurance documents are listed below. Equipment specifications will delineate those required for specific items.

a.  !,,,!uality Assurance Manual

b. Design Criteria (SAR)

c. hpplicable Codes ~nd Standards

d. Design rlelease Procedure

e. Work Instructions

f. ~equests for Bid

g. rurchase Specifications

h. Identification System (Materials, Parts, and Components)

i. ?rocess Control Procedure (Special Processes)

        .) . Inspection* and Test Plan K. Inspection.Procedure

1. Calibration Procedure rn. Instruction for Handling, Storage, and Shipping

n. Construction, Pre-operational, and Start-up Test Procedures e 0. Audit Plan 17.5 ~UALITY PERFORMANC~ DOCUMENTATION

       ~ypical ferformance Records which may be required by equipment s pee if ica t ions are as .follows:

a. Design tlev iew i{e port:3

b. Design C~lculations

c. ~esign Verification Testing Records

d. Drawings and ~pecification~

t:

• Design Helease aecords

        ~* ,  Design Change Records i*     Supplier ivaluations (Quality System, special processing capability)

n. ~eceiving Inspe~tion Records J.

• inventory ~ecords J . ~quipment Certifications (Special Processes)

K. _i-iersonnel Certification hecords (Special Processes)

              ~rocess Control aecords (Special Processes)
       ~
      ..L

• lil
• Inspec~ion and Test Records

n. M&terial C~rtificatiana

0. Test and Inspection ~quipment Calibration Records

p. Nonconforming Material Reports and Dispositions

q. Corrective Action Reports e r. Audit Heports.

DATE 12/1/73 {Rev.1) PAGE~ oF__3~

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL ~..--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~----~~-------~---. TITLE: QUALITY REQUIREMENT

            ~UALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS                               Q.R. NO.         17.0 17.6  OPBHATING QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION

a. ~tation Operati9n.

b.: Maintenance

c. .ctepair

d. riefueling .

e. ~lant Modification 17.7 R~TBNTION REQUIREMENTS iil~s shall be maintained current, complete, and av~ilable for aJ.dit by Commonwealth .Sdison Company or its agents at any time durin5 the retention period. Contractors and suppliers may retain their quality records as required by applicable codes, standard, and/or contract ~equirements. At the end of the required retention period, the contractor o~ supplier shall transfer these records to the Commonwealth Edison Compa~y Site

       ~uality Assurance Coordinator or Supervisor of Quality Assurance to file in a secure lopation for the life of the plant. In no
      .case will the. file be destroyed without written instruction from Commonwealth ..::dison Company.

17.6 R.i!:COHDS CONTROL

       '.L'he method of controlJ. ing storage and retrieval of quality records is described in ~uality Procedure Section 17.

17.9 IMPLEMENTING PliOC..t!:DURES

       ~ection    17 of the   ~ualit~ Procedures contains the implementing proc~dures   for this section of the ~uality Requirements.
                                                              )
                                                       /~
                                                  '-~*--~.-
                                                          .. ~,------~~-,..---~~~

Assurance Manager of DATE 12/1/73 (Rev.1) PAGE-.-.L. OF_]__

e Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALi TY REQUIREMENT AUDITS Q.R. NO. 18.0 18.1 G~NEHAL Audits will be performed by Commonwealth Edison Company and/or

    'i*ts contractors, subcontractors and suppliers to verify the adequacy and effectiveness of quality programs under their cognizance. These audits are to be conducted to assist the organization being audited and assure. that required corrective action or improvements are accomplished.

Audits will cover quality systems for engineering, construction, and operation. Systems audits evaluate the quality program in-cluding the adherence to procedures and controls. The adequacy of certifications and records will also be evaluated. Product audits assess the effectiveness of inspections and tests that are specific to the fabrication, installation, construction, testing, and operation of an item. lb.2 AUDIT PLAN Audits will be planned using a checklist and will be conducted in accordance with a schedule. Audits are to be performed efficiently in order to provide a minimum of interfere~ce with work in progress and minimum disruption of organizations being audited. An audit plan will be maintained in order to schedule audits, designate the CECo organization or contractor to be audited, and identify the organization involved in the audit. The elements in the quality program, in procurement documents, and in related codes and standards, are subject to systems audits. Also, items received, fabricated, and constructed or installed for use by Commonwe~lth Bdison Company in its nuclear power plants are subject to product audits.

     ~udits   will be performed throughout the life of each contract at such frequencies as are nec~ssary to verify compliance and determine the effectiveness of procedures, inspections, tests, process controls, and documentation.

16.3 AUDIT ORGANIZATION Pi.udits will be conducted by qualified personnel who are familiar with written procedures, standards, and processes applicable to the area beint audited, but who do not have specific line responsibilities for the area beinG audited. DATE 12/1/73 (Rev. 1 ) PAGE-1:- OF--l.

8 Commonwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALi TY REQUIREMENT AUDITS Q.R. NO. 18.0 16.~ PERFORMANCE AND REPORTING A checklist or a listing of the qu~lity system elements will

• be prepared for each audit which will identify in advance the features to be verified. The agenda or listing of quality elements provides the basis for performing an audit and provides a record of the details for the audit report. The audit report will show the general area or item beinr audited and any specific deficiencies that have been noted. The audit report will be signed and dated by the auditor and will be distributed for re-view by management following the completion of the audit. Where deficiencies are noted, management responsible for quality assurance will define a schedule for implementing corrective action as a part of the audit.

le.) FOLLOW-UP H~4UIREMBNTS Audit reports which reveal deficiencies in quality performance will be distributed to Commonwealth idison Company management for review. The purpose of the review is to determine the nature and severity of conditions found, the effectiveness of corrective action taken, and.any need for revision of the quality system. There will be follow up on corrective action commitments to assure effective implementation has been carried out. Defitiencies in the execution or implementation.of correctiv~ action will be brought to the attention of the person who is res~onsible in the area involved. Continued deficiencies, or failure to implement effective corrective action will be re-ported to appropriate management level within Commonwealth idisori Company. 16.6 IMPLBMENTING PHOCBDUHBS

      ~ection  18 of tne ~uality Procedure~ contains the implementing procedures for this section of the ~uality Requirements

• Assurance Manager of DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev* 1) PAGE___l_ OF -2._

APPENDIX &-QUALITY ASSURANCE CRITERIA FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS AND FUEL REPROCESSING PLANTS rn 14,689bJ batroduction. Every applirant for a construction permit is required by the provisions of § 50.34 to include in its preliminary safety analysis report a de-scription of the quality assurance program to be applied to the design. fabrica-tion, construction, and testing- of the structures, systems, and components of the facility. Every applicant for :in operating- license is required to include, in its final safety analysis report, information pertaining to the managerial and administrative controls to be used to assure safe operation. Nuclear power plants and fuel reproressing- plants include structures, systems and components that prevent 0r miti~ate the consequences of postulated accicients that could ci\usc undue risk to the health and safety of the (>ublic. This ap-pendix establishes quality assurance requirements for the dcs1gn. construl*tiqn Atomic EnerCY Law Report1 10 CFR 50, App. 8 ~ 14,689h

and operation of those !ltructurcs, systems, and components. The pertinent requirements of this appendix apply to all activities affecting the sa.fety-relatect functions of those structures, systems, and components; these activi-ties include designing, purchasing, fabricating, handling, shipping, storing, cleaning, erecting, installing, inspecting, testing, operating, maintaining, re-pairing, refueling, and modifying. .

• As used in this appendix, "quality assurance" comprises all those planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a struc-ture, system, or cnmpnnent will per.form satisfactorily in service. Quality usurance includes quality control, which comprises those quality assurance actions related to the physical characteristics of a material, structure, com-ponent, or system which provide a means to control the quality of the material, structure, component, or system to predetermined requirements.

I. ORGANIZATION The applicant shall be respo~sible for the establishment and execution 1 of the quality assurance program. The. applicant may delegate to other or-gaJSizations the work of e!ltablishing and executing the quality assurance pro-gram, or any part thereof, but shall retain responsibility therefor. The authority and duties of persons and organizations performinJ? Quality assu'rance funr.- tions shal! be clearly established and delincllted in writil)g. Such persons and organizations shall have sufficient* authority and vrganizational freedom to identify quality problems; to initiate, recommend, or provide solutions; and to verify implementation of solutions. In general, assurance of quality requires management measures which provide that the individ*ual or group assigned the responsibility for checking, auditing, inspecting, or otherwise verifying that an activity has been correctly performed is independent of the individual or group directly responsible for performing the specific ac~ivity.

       .                 . II. QUALITY    Asst'RANCE PaocRA~.1 The appiicant shall establish at the earliest practicable time, consistent with the schedule for accomplishing the activities, a quality assurance. pro-gram which complies with the requirements of this appentlix. This program .

shall be documented by written policies, procedures, or instructions and !!hall be c:irried out throughout plant life in :iccordance with those polir'it'~. pro-cedures, or instructions. The applicant shall identify the structures, systems, and components to be covered by the quality assurance program and the major organizations participating in the proJrram, together with the designated func-tions of these organizntion!I. The quality assurance program' shall provide control over activities affecting the quality of the identified structures, sys-tems, and components, to :in extent consistent with their importance to safety. Activities affecting quality shall be accomplished under suitably controlled conditions. Controlled conditions include the \1Se of appropriate equipment; !1Uitable environmental conditions for accomplishing the activity, such as ade-quate cleanness; and assur:ince that all prerequisites for the given activity have been satisfied. The program shall take into account the need for special controls, processes, test equipment, tools, and skills to attain the required quality, and the need for verification of quality by insyection and test. The program shall provide for indoctrination and training o personnel performing activities affecting quality as necess:iry to :i!lsurt that suitable proficiency is

• Wllll* the term "applicant" 11 used In these These erlterla Will a110 'be und for auldanee ertterla. the requirement* are. of coune, appll- In evaluatlna the adequacy of quality auurance cabl* after aucll a penon hu received a license pro1rram1 In uao by holdel'I of con1tn&ctlon pe,..

to eon1tnact and operate a nuclear powerplant. mlt1 a.nd opera.Una llc:enaea. t 14.881* 10 CFR SO. App. B © 1v*11, (.'ommen:e Clearln1 House, Inc.

___ ..._ll

. .,.,.          Part S~Licenain1 of ProdUction and Utilisation Pacilldes 20.tll*I achieved and maintained. The applicant shall re~larly *review the status and adequacy of the quality assurance proi:ram. ManaJ:'ement of other ori:nniza-tions participnting in the quality assurance program shall regularly review the status and adequacy of that part of the quality assurance program which they are executing.

III. DESIGN CoNTROL Measures shall be established to assure that applicable regulatory require-ments and the clesign basis, as defined in § 50.2 ancl as specified in the license application, for those structures, systems, and components to which this ap-pendix applies are correctly translated into specifications, clrawin~s. pro-cedures, and instructions. These measures shall include provisions to assure that appropriate quality standards are specified and included in design docu-ments and that deviations from such standards arc controlled. Measures shall also be established for the selection anrl re,*iew for suitability of application of materials, parts. equipment, and processes that arc essential to the safety-related functions of the structures, systems and components. Measures shall be established for the i1lentification and control of design interfaces and for coordination among participating design organizations. These measures shall include the establishment of procedures among partici-pating design organizations for the review, approval, release, distribution. and revision of documents involving design interfaces. The design control measures shall provide for verifyin~ or checking the adequacy of desi~n, s_uch as by th~ performance of design reviews, by the use . of JLltemate or s1mphfied calculational methods, or. by the.performance of a euitable testing program. The verifying or checking process shall be per-formed by individuals or groups other than those who performed the original design, but who may be from the same organization. \.Vhere a* test program is used to verify the adequacy of a specific design feature in lieu of other veri-fying or checking processes. it shall include suitable qualification testing of a prototype unit under the most adverse design conditions. Design control measures shall be applied to items such as the following: reactor physics, stress, thermal, hydraulic, and accident analyses; compatibility of materials; accessibility for inscrvi.:e inspedion, maintenance, and repair; and delineation of acceptance criteria for inspections and tests. Design changes, including field changes, shall be subject to design control measures commensurate with those applied to the original design and be ap-proved by the organization that performed the original design unless the ap-plicant designates another responsible organization. IV. PRocuREMENT Docu1t1ENT CONTROL Measures shall be established to assure that applicable regulatory require-ments, design bases, and other requirements which are necessary to assure adequate quality are suitably included or referenced in the documents for pro-curement of material, equipment, and services, whether purchased by the applicant or by its contractors or subcontractors. To the extent necessary, procurement documents shall require contractors or subcontractors to provide* a quality assurance program consistent with the pertinent provisions of this appendix. V. INSTRUCTJONs, PaocEDURES, AND DRAWINGS Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instruc-tions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, Atomic Enersy Law Reports 10 CFR 10, A*P* B 11 14,lllb

ao,Cll*IO

                                                                           ...._~II or drawings. Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriAte quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.

VI. DoCUMENT CONTROL Measures shall be established to control the issuance of documents, such as instructions, procedures, and drawings, including changes thereto, which prescribe all activities affecting quality. These measures shall assure that documents, including changes, are reviewed for adequacy and approved for release by authorized personnel and arc distributed to and used at the location where the prescribed activity is performed. Changes to documents shall be rev!ewed and approved by the same or~anization~ that performed the orig~nal review and approval unless the applicant designates another responsible organization. VII. CoNTROL OF PURCHASED MATEJ.IAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES Measures shall be established to assure that purchased material, equip-ment, and .!ervices, whether purchased directly or through contractors and 1ubcontractors, conform to the procurement documents. These measures shall include provisions, as appropriate, for source evaluation and selection, objective evidence of quality furnished by the contractor or subcontractor, inspection i,.t the contractor or subcontractor source, anJ examination of products upon delivery. Documentary evidence that material .anti equipment conform to the procurement requirements shall be available at the nuclear powerplant site prior to installation or use of such material and equipment. This documentary evidence shall be retained at the nuclear powerplant site and shall be sufficient to identify the specific requirements, such as. codes, standards, or specifications, met by the purchased material and equipment. The effectiveness of the c.ontrol 0£ quality by contractors and subcontractors shall be assessed by the applicant or designee at intervals consistent with the imp0rtance, complexity, and quantity of the product or services. VIII. IDENTIFICATION AND CoNTllOL OF MATERIALS, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS Measures shall be established for the identification and control of ma-terials, parts, and components, including partially fabricated assemblies. ,\

• . These measures shall assure that identification of the item is maintained by heat number, part number, serial number, or other appropriate means, either on the item or on records traceable to the item, as required throughout fabri-cation, erection, installation, and use of the item. These identification and control measures shall be designed to prevent the use of incorrect or defective material, parts, and components.

IX. CoNTJlOL OF SPECIAL PROC£SSES

    .: . Measures shall. be established to a~sure th~t special processes, including welding, heat treatmg, and nonciestructtve testing, are controlled and accom-plished by qualified personnel using qualified procedures in accordance with applicable codes, standards, specifications, criteria, and other special require-ments.

X.

• INSPECTION

       *: A program for: inspection of activities .affecting quality shall be estab-lished and executed by or for the organization performing the activity to verify conformance with the documented instructions, procedures, and draw-1114,*eallt 10 CFR so. App. 8                  © l!J'll, Commerce Clearins Howie. lac.

e. ...............

            ,.,.        Part ~L1...,a1n1 of ProclactioD and Utillab Padlltla   20.411* I I inp for accomplishing the activity. Such inspection shalt be performed by individuals other than those who performed the activity being inspected.

Examinations, measurements, or tests of material or products processed shall be performed for *each work operation where necessary to assure quality. If inspection of processed material or produds is impossible or disadvan-tageous, indirec.t control by monitoring processing methods, equipment, and personnel shall be provided. Both inspection and process monitoring shall be provided when control is inadequate without both. If mandatory inspection hold points, which require witnessin$' or inspecting by the applicant's desig-nated representative and beyond which work shall not proceed without the consent of its designated representative are required, the specific hold points shall be indicated in appropriate documents. XI. Tr.sT CoNTROL A test program shall be established to assure that ~11 testing required to demonstrate that !"truct11res, syste!'!!!, and components will perform satis-factorily in service is identified and.performed in accordance with written test procedures which incorporate the requirements and acceptance limits con-tained in applicable design documents. The test pro~am shall include, as appropriate, proof tests prior to installation, preoperattonal tests, and opera-tional tests during nuclear power plant and fuel reprocessing plant operation,

• ~

of structures, systems, and eomponents. Test procedures shall include pro-i ,.uions for assuring that all prerequisites ior the given test have been met, that adequate test instrumentation is available and used, and that the test is per-formed under suitable environmental conditions. Test results shall be docu-mented and evaluated to assure that test requirements have been* satisfied.

• e XII. CoNTRoL or MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT Measures shall be established to assure that tools, gages, instruments, and other measuring and testing devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, calibrated, and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within necessary limits.
• XIII. HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING Measures shall ue established to control the handlin~, storage, shipping, cleaning and prf'!lf'rvatiC1n of material and equipment in accordance with work and inspection instructions to prevent damage or deterioration. \Vhen necessary for particular prod*ucts, special protective environments, such as inert gas atmosphere, specific moisture content levels, and temperature levels, shall be specified and provided.

XIV. INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS Measures shall be established to indicate, by the use of markings* su~h as stamps, tags, ltlbels, routing Ctlrds, or other. suitable means, the status of inspections and tests performed upon individual items of the nuclear power plant and fuel reprocessing plant. These measures shall provide for the identi-fication of items which have satisfactorily passed required inspections arid tests, where necessary to preclude inadvertent bypassing of such inspections and tests. Measures shall also be established for indicating the operatin~ status of structures, systems, and components of the nuclear power plant and

       ~uel r~processing plant, such as by tagging valves and *switches, to prevent inadvertent operation.

Atamlc: Enef'IY Law Reporte 10 Cl'll IO. App. B 11 14.181*

20.482 * * .Reculation~Atomlc Enera Comrniaalon *umber 141-14 tl-17-71 XV. NoNCONFORMINCi 1\1.untALs, PARTS, OR Co11PONENTs

 -   Measures shall be established to control materials, parts, or components which do not conform to requirements in or<ler to prevent their inadvertent use or installation. These measures shall include, as appropriate, procedures for identification, documentation, segregation, disposition, and notification to affected organizations. Nonconforming items shall be reviewed a~d accepted, rejected, repaired or reworked in. accordance with documented procedures.
                             - XVI. COUECTIVE ACTION -

Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected. In the case of significant conditions ad.verse to quality, the measures shall assure that the cause of the condition is detem1ined and corrective action taken to preclude repetition. The identification of the si~nificant condition adverse to quality, the caus~ of the condition, and the corrective action taken -shall be documented and reported to appropriate levels of management. x*11*1r. QUAL1TY Asst:RANCI:: Rt::CURUS Sufficient records shall be maintained to furnish evidence of activities affecting quality. The records shall include at least the following: Operating logs and the results of reviews, inspections, tests. audits, monjtoring of work performance, and materials analyses. The records shall also include closely related data such as qualifications of personnel, procedures, and equipment. Inspection and test records shall, as a minimum, identify the inspector or data recorder, the type of observation. the results,_ the acceptability, and the action taken in connection with _any deficiencies noted. Records shall be identifiable anct retrievable. Consistent with applicahle regulatory require-ments, the applicant shall establish requirements concerning record retention, such as duration, location, and assigned responsibility.

• I,*

XVIII. AUDITS A co~p-rehensive system of planned and periodic audits shall be carried out to verify compliance with all aspects of the quality as!'urance prog-ram and to determine the effectiveness of the program. The au1lit5 shall he per-formed in accordance with the written procedures or check lists Ly appro-priately trained pe1 :.u11111:l m~t having direct responsibilities in the areas being audited. Audit results shall Le documented and reviewed by management ha_ving responsibility in the area audited. Followup action, including reaudit of deficient areas, shall be taken where indicated.

 *   [Appendix B as added June 17, 1970, effective July 27, 1970 (35 F. R.

10498) and amended September 11, 1971, effective October 11, 1971 (36 F. R. 18301).] t 14.889b 10 CFR 50. App. B e 1971, Commerce Clearinc House, Inc.

• Comm.~nwealth Edison Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TITLE: QUALITY PROCEDURES INDEX (ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION)

No. Title Rev. Date 2-1 Procedure For Revision of the Quality Assurance 12-1-73 Manual 2-2 Training of Personnel to Mee.t Quality Assurance 12-1-73 Requirements

• 3-1 Design Control 12-1 ... 73 3-2 Design Change Control 12-1-73 3~3 Classification of Systems, Components, Parts and 12-1-73 Materials ,

4-1 Request for Bid, Proposal Evaluation and

• 12-1-73 Recommendation 4-2 Evaluation of Contractor's. Quality Assurance 12-1-73

           *Program e     5-1    Quality Instructions and Procedures                    12-1-73 6-1    Distribution of Design Documents                       12-1-73 7-1    Control of Procured Material and Equipment -

Receiving and Inspection - 12-1-73 7-2 Off-Site Contractor Inspection 12-1-73 7-3 Surveillance of Nuclear Fuel Contractors 12-1-73. 8-1 Identification and Control of Materials, Parts . 12-1-73 and Components 9-1 Control of Contractor Special Processes 12-1-73 10-1. On-Site Constrac'tor Inspection 12-*1-73 11-1 Development, Performance, Documentation and 12-1-73 Evaluation of Construction Tests 11-2 Development, Performance, Documentation.and 12-1-73 Evaluation of Pre-Operational and ~tart-Up Tests DATE 12/1 /73 (Rev.3) PAGE_!_ OF~

• Commonwealth Edison. Company QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL "TITLE: QUALITY PROCEDURES INDEX (ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION)

;.:~

Title Rev. Date

            -No.-

12-1 Calibration Control of Commonwealth Edison Test 12-1-73 and Measurement Equipment 12-2 Calibration and Control of Station Instrumentation 12-1-73 and Control Equipment 13--1 Site Handling, Storage, Preservation, Maintenance 1?-1-73

                       .and Shipping of Material, Equipment and Components 1'~-1      Inspection and Test                                    12-1-73 1.5-1      Reporting Quality Nonconformances During Construe-     12-1-73 tion and Test 15...,2    Reporting Incidents and Deficiencies That Occur        12-1-73 During Construction and Tests 16-1       Correctiv~  Action for Responsible Deficiencies and    12-1-13 e                Nonconformances That Occµr During Construction and*

Test t7-1 Quality Assurance ~ecords 12-1-73

           '18-1      Quality Program Audits                                 .12-1-73

.:; 18-2 Surveillance .of Contractor Quality Assurance/ .

• 12-1.-73 Control Activities DATE 12/1/73 (Rev.3) PAGE~ QF_2_}}