ML12363A107

Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Decommissioning Study Plan

ML12363A107
Person / Time
Site:	Yankee Rowe
Issue date:	12/31/2012
From:	Knight Cost Engineering Services
To:	Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Yankee Atomic Electric Co
Shared Package
ML123630169	List: ML12363A106 ML12363A107
References
BYR 2012-043
Download: ML12363A107 (24)

Text

Decommissioning Study of the Yankee Rowe Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Prepared for Yankee Atomic Power Company Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC December, 2012

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

............................................................................................ 3 2.0

SUMMARY

................................................................................... 4 3.0 DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATING METHODOLOGIES................7 4.0 ASSUMPTIONS .............................................................................. 8 5.0 SCHEDULES ............................................................................... 10 6.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ................................................................ 12 6.1 UTILITY STAFF ....................................................................................... 12 6.2 DECOMMISSIONING GENERAL CONTRACTOR ............................................ 12 6.3 SECURITY ................................................ ............................. 13

7.0 REFERENCES

.............................................................................. 14 APPENDIX A ...................................................................................... 15 Page 2 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to identify the costs associated with the decommissioning of the Yankee Rowe (YR) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). This estimate includes only the structures, systems and land within the NRC licensed area. The YR ISFSI is located in the South East portion of the former reactor site. The NAC-MPC fuel storage and transport canister system chosen by YR is licensed by the NRC for both storage and transportation.

There are 16 dry storage casks on the 50 by 180-foot, three-foot-thick concrete pad at the YR ISFSI. Fifteen of the casks contain the 533 spent fuel assemblies and one cask stores sections of the reactor vessel internals that are classified as Greater Than Class C (GTCC) waste. Each vertical concrete cask has a three and a half-inch steel liner surrounded by 21 inches of reinforced concrete. The entire dry storage process -- procuring materials, fabricating the fuel containers, constructing the storage facility and transferring spent fuel was completed in June 2003.

Page 3 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 2.0

SUMMARY

Decommissioning is the safe removal of a facility or site from service and the reduction of radioactivity to a level that permits either the release of the property for unrestricted use and NRC license termination; or a restricted release of the property and NRC license termination.

This estimate includes all costs incurred to release the property for unrestricted use.

On June 17, 2011, the NRC published a final rule amending its regulations to improve decommissioning planning. The rule will become effective on December 17, 2012 and requires compliance by March 31, 2013. This rule will require licensees to report additional details in their decommissioning cost estimate. To assist in the implementation of the new rule, the NRC issued NUREG-1757, "Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance, Financial Assurance, Recordkeeping and Timeliness."

NUREG-1 757 does not apply to licensees under I OCFR Part 50 nor does it eliminate the need to follow Regulatory Guide 1.202 or NUREG-1713. It does provide additional information to support the development of the cost estimate. This cost estimate was prepared in accordance with the guidelines provided in RG 1.202 and NUREG-1713. In addition, it does take into account the guidelines identified in NUREG-1757.

NUREG-1757 specifies that a contingency of 25% is to be included in the estimate. This estimate takes exception to this contingency level for two reasons. First, the estimate is conservative in that the entire storage pad, concrete overpacks and overpack liners are assumed to be disposed of as potentially contaminated. Second, the YR site has recently been successfully decommissioned. Many of the key personnel involved in that project remain at the YR ISFSI.

The lessons learned from that project will be incorporated in the YR ISFSI decommissioning.

For this reason it is felt that a 10% contingency is adequate to cover unknown and unplanned occurrences.

The total cost including contingency is $9.8 million, $8.5 million for radiological removal and

$1.3 million for non-radiological removal. Table 2-1 provides a summary of costs. Cost details are provided in Appendix A TABLE 2-1

SUMMARY

OF COSTS Non-Radiological radiological Total Cost Removal $ Removal $

Grand Total Building $9,848,120 $8,510,833 $1,337,287 Tax on General Contractor $0 $0 so General Contractor with contingency $6,033,61.2 S5,214,301 $819,311 Page 4 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 Site Costs with contingency $3,814,508 $3,296,532 $517,976 General. Contractor $5,485,102 $4,740,274 $744,828 Site Costs $3,467,735 $2,996,847 $470,888 YR ISFSI S8,952,837 $7,737,121 $1,215,716 PERIOD DEPENDENT COSTS $5,814,531 $5,024,970 $789,562 1.1 YR Site Costs $3,467,735 $2,996,847 $470,888 1.1.1 Project Management $1,222,720 1.1.2 Security Staff $889,014 1.1.3 Fees $325,000 $280,868 $44,132 1.1.4 Insurance $631,000 $545,316 $85,684 1.1.5 Legal $200,000 $172,842 $27,158 I.1.6 Property Taxes $200,000 $172,842 $27,158 1.2 General Contractor $2,346,796 $2,028,122 $318,674 1.2.1 Decommissioning General Contractor $1,209,290 1.2.2 Waste Packaging Crew $512,621 1.2.3 Equipment & Materials $624,885 ACTIVITIES $3,138,305 $2,712,151 $426,154 1.3 Project Engineering $21,108 $18,242 $2,866 1.3.1 Procedure Development and Review - Offsite $10,554 Preparation of QA and Safety Documents-1.3.2 Offsite (in parallel with 1.2.1) $10,554 Site Mobilization and General Employee 1.4 Training (GET) $106,669 $92,184 $14,485 1.4.1 Site Mobilization $27,198 1.4.2 General Employee Training $71,738 1.4.3 Site Specific Training $7,733 1.5 Site Preparation - Performed by Staff $14,404 $12,448 $1,956 1.5.1 Initial Site Survey 1.5.2 Setup work areas 1.5.3 Decontamination Readiness Review 1.6 Disconnect all utilities to work areas. $7,202 $6,224 $978 1.6.1 Electrical $3,601 1.6.2 Ventilation $1,800 1.6.3 Piping $1,800 1.7 Removal inside security fence $2,596,684 $2,535,505 $61,179 1.7.1 Remove Guard Posts $3,305 $3,305 1.7.2 Instrument Enclosure $8,375 $0 $8,375 1.7.3 Remove VCCs $1,208,823 $1,208,823 $0 1.7.3.1 Exterior Concrete $612,010 $0 $0 1.7.3.2 Steel liner $596,812 1.7.4 Remove Concrete Pad $1,326,683 $1,326,683 1.7.5 Remove Fence and Towers $39,399 $39,399 1.7.6 Remove Light Towers $10,100 $10,100 1.8 Removal outside security fence $334,315 $334,315 Page 5 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 1.8.1 Remove Nuisance Fence $70,485 $70.485 1.8.2 Retaining Wall $46,334 $46,334 Conduit and wire - Instrument Enclosure to 1.8.3 Utility Pole $23,208 $23,208 1.8.4 Remove road inside licensed area $190,915 $190,915 1.8.5 Remove vehicle barriers $3,373 $3,373 1.8.10 Miscellaneous Final Site Survey Structure gone - By DGC 1.9 Staff $25,000 $21,605 $3,395 1.9.1 Prepare Final Status Survey Plan 1.9.2 Soil Sampling I *9.3 Direct Survey 1.9.4 Sampling Analysis 1.9.5 Prepare Final Status Survey Report 1.1 Orise Site Release Confirmation 1.11 Outside areas $2,904 $2,904 1.11.1 Backfill, grade and seed $2,904 $2,904 1.12 Demolition Crew Demobilization $19,465 $16,822 $2,643 1.13 Final Project Report - Offsite $10,554 $9,121 $1,433 Page 6 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 3.0 DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATING APPROACH Two types of costs were determined in this estimate: activity costs and level of effort costs. The activity costs were developed utilizing a unit cost factor approach. Site material quantities for concrete, steel and equipment where developed from site specific drawings. Productivity factors were applied to these quantities to determine activity durations. Labor crews were developed and applied to the material quantities to determine labor costs and person-hours. The activity durations were used to develop a project schedule.

The level of effort costs such as equipment rental and the General Contractor (GC) staff were developed based on the project schedule duration. A rental equipment file was developed for the construction effort. The GC staff is assumed to be on-site for the duration of the project. The Oversight staff cost is another level of effort cost that is included in the cost estimate.

Bulk removal of the storage pad and concrete storage casks is assumed to be performed using an excavator with a hydraulic hammer attachment. The steel liner will be segmented utilizing torch cutters. All of this waste will be trucked off-site for processing. This leads to a large disposal volume; however, at a lower rate for bulk processing than for direct burial. In addition, there will be far less characterization and iterative decontamination. Clean structures will be demolished using mechanical means and disposed of at a local landfill.

In addition to the removal labor there is a dedicated waste packaging crew included in this estimate. This crew will consolidate, package and prepare containers for transportation. The waste packaging is estimated to remain on site for the duration of the project. This crew consists of 2 laborers; I Health Physics Technician; 1 Equipment Operator and 1 Foreman.

Page 7 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 4.0 ASSUMPTIONS Following is a list of assumptions developed by KCES in completing this study. These assumptions are based on the most current decommissioning methodologies and site-specific considerations.

1. Component quantities were developed from actual plant listings.

2. Concrete volumes were developed from plant drawings.

3. The oversight staff is assumed to be the similar size and configuration as it is currently.

4. The oversight staff positions and costs were supplied by the Company and represent July, 2012 salary and benefit data.

5. Subcontractor base labor rates and fringe benefits were taken directly from the 2012 R. S. Means Heavy Construction Cost Data and adjusted to Massachusetts based on the City Cost Indexes for Pittsfield, MA.

6. Activity labor costs do not include any allowance for delays between activities, nor is there any cost allowance for craft labor retained on-site while waiting for work to become available.

7. All skilled laborers will be supplied locally and hired by the Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC).

8. The cost for Utility personnel assisting the DGC to develop decommissioning activity specifications is included in the Utility Staff costs.

9. The separate DGC staff salaries, including overhead and profit, were determined by KCES.

10. Transportation costs are based on actual mileage from YR to Memphis, TN processing facility utilized in the estimate.

11. The ISFSI Concrete Pad, VCC exterior concrete and VCC liner steel are assumed to be Class A waste. This waste will be disposed of at the Studsvik processing facility in Tennessee. A disposal rate of $0.1.3 per pound has been used in this estimate and is based on information provided by Studsvik.

12. The following buildings are disposed of as Clean waste in local landfill. A disposal rate of $91.80 per ton has been used in this estimate and is based on information provided in the 2012 R. S. Means Building Construction Cost Data.

Guard Posts Instrument Enclosure Page 8 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 Security Fence Light Towers Nuisance Fence Retaining Wall Conduit and wire - Instrument Enclosure to Utility Pole Road inside licensed area Vehicle barrier

13. All costs used in these calculations were current on July, 2012.

14. The costs of all required safety analyses and safety measures for the protection of the general public, the environment, and decommissioning workers are included in the cost estimates.

15. It is assumed that all MPCs containing both spent fuel and GTCC will have been removed from site prior to the start of decommissioning.

16. Property taxes are included in the estimate at the current cost of $200,000 per year.

17. Fees are included in the estimate at the current cost of $325,000 per year.

18. Insurance costs are included in the estimate at the current cost of $631,000 per year.

19. Legal costs are included in the estimate at the current cost of $200,000 per year.

20. The decommissioning will be performed under the current regulations.

21. Removal of the pad and concrete overpacks will be performed in Tyvek coveralls.

Productivity rates have been adjusted to account for this.

22. No subsurface material is assumed to require remediation regarding radionuclides. This assumption is justified because: 1) the ISFSI area was confirmed to be clean of radiological contaminants prior to the construction of the ISFSI; 2) the ISFSI area will be maintained clean of loose radiological contaminants during the storage period; 3) the irradiated fuel and GTCC waste are stored in sealed canisters; 4) nuclear activation of the VCCs, VCCs liners, and ISFSI pad are anticipated; the activation products will remain fixed during the storage period; and 5) if contamination of subsurface material occurs during decommissioning activities, the contamination is expected to remain below the decommissioning criteria of 25 millirem per year Total Effective Dose Equivalent.

Page 9 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 5.0 SCHEDULE A scenario-specific schedule has been developed for estimate.

Activity durations were determined based on the unit cost factor approach. Plant material inventory quantities were developed from site specific material. Unit rates for cost, man hours and schedule hours were applied to the material quantities. From this calculation the removal or decontamination cost, total man hours and total schedule hours were determined for an activity.

The schedule hours are then entered into the schedule to determine project duration. Two work crews are assumed for the concrete pad and concrete overpacks. All other work was assumed to be performed by one crew. Work outside of the security fence will be performed in parallel with the work inside the fence. The total project duration is 6.96 months.

Figure 5-1 provides the detailed decommissioning schedule.

Page 10 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 Figure 5-1 Project Schedule ID iTask Name Duration l Start ..1u...

st Quarter...... ....... .. ...... T i2nd Quarter ......... l 3rd - ,,J6

... Quarter

.................* - -' - i - Finish i Dec Aug

. Project EngIneering Thu i2/14 Wed 118/14 5 days:

3 i Procedure Development and Review - Offsite Wed I1//14 5 days: ThuV,2114

-4 Preparation of OA and Safety Documents - offsita 9 danys Thu 1V9114 Wad 11/114 1

- 6 1- -............. l . . .. . .

5  ! Site Mobiiiation and General Eomployee Training (GET) 3 days Thu 119114 Tue 1121/14

-. 616-i Site Mobilization Mon 1/13/14 7 General Employee Training 5 days Tue 1114(14 Mon 1120/14' 6- 1 Site Specific Training I day Tue t121114 Tue 1121114 9 Site Preparation - Performed by Staff 4 days Wed 1122/14 Mon112714

.d Initial Site Survey 2 days Wed 1/221i4 Thu 1/23/14

.4 11 ' Setup work areas 1 day Fri 1/24/14 Fri 1124/14 i;~.

12 Decontamination Readiness Review 1 day Mon 1V27114 Mon 1/27/14 13 Discennect ail utilities to work areas. 2 days.. Tue 1128114 W"us 1128114

-1"4 Electrical 1 day Tue 1128114 Tue 1/28/14,

.15 Ventilation 0.5 days Wed 1/29/14 Wed 1/28/14 16 i Piping G.5days Wed 1129114 Wed 1129/14 1 17 Removal Iialda Soeuirty Fence 90.13 days Thu 1130114 The 615114 18 i Remove Guard Poots 0.59 days: Thu 1130/14 Thu 1/30114 19-" Remove Instrument Enclosure 1.24 days Thu 1130114 FrP1/31114 It.

20 Remove VCCs 49.22 days Fri 1131114 Fri 4/11114 1 Extletrir Concrete. 12.55days Fri 1131/14 Wed 2/19/14 Steel liner 3M.67days Wed 2119Mt' Fo 4/11i/14 23 Remove Concrete Padc 27.21 days Fri4111/14 Tue 5120114 24 Remove Fence and Towers 9.41 days Tue 5120/14 Mon 6/2/14 25 Remove Light Towers 2.46 days Mon 612/14 Thu 6/5114 26 i Removal Ottilde Security Pence 39.79 days Thu 1130114 Wed 3128114 27 RemoveNuisance Fence 17.21 days Thu 1130/14 Mon2/24/14 ..

28 Remove Retaining Wall 5.14 days Mon2124)14 Mon3/3/14 29 Remove Conduit and Wire 6.44 days Mon 313114 Tue 3/11/14 Liii 30 3"

Remove road inside licensed area Remove vehicle barrier 10.33 days 0.67 days Tue 3111/14 Wed 3126/14 Wed 3/26114 Wed 3/26/14 1 F

23 days Thu G15/14 32 Final Site Sarvey Structure gone - By DGC Staff Tue 718114,1 33 Prepare Final Status Survey Plan 5 days TIhu 6/5/14 Thu 6/I2/14 34 Soil Sampling 5 days Thu W-12/14

..3 Direct Survey 3 days Thu 6119/14 Tue 6/24/14

.36 Sampling Analysls 5 days Tue 6(24/14 Tue 71/ 14 37 1 Prepare Final Status Survey Report 5 days" Tue 7/1/14 Tue 7'18/14Te714 38 avseSite Release Confirmation 0days" Toe 7/8/14, 1.1

-I Outidle areas 5.93 days Tue 7/8114 Wed 7116114 i

• Wed 71'16/U4 40 BacktItl, grade and seed 6.93

& days .. T.uea78114 41--] Demoitilon Craw Oemobllioallon 2 days Wed 7116/14 Fri 7/18/114

.42 -"I Final Project Report - Offite.i 10 days Fri7/18/14: Fri8111141 Page 11 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 6.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT There are three components to project management during decommissioning, Oversight Staff (staff), Decommissioning General Contractor Staff (DGC) and Security. The person levels for each are identified below.

6.1 OVERSIGHT STAFF The staff size is currently at a level of 18 and is assumed to be maintained at this level and at a similar configuration during the decommissioning. In addition, one final status survey resource will be added and one licensing person will be added to assist in the decommissioning. The staff will provide DGC oversight as well as maintain license compliance. Table 7-1 provides a summary of this staff.

TABLE 6-1 OVERSIGHT STAFF Staff Number President 1 Cask Relicensing Project Manager 1 Workers Concerns Manager 1.

Business Manager I ISFSI Manager 2 ISFSI QA Manager 1 Director Government Relations 1 General iCounsel I Business Administrator I Treasurer I Accountant 1 Benefits Manager I IT Services I ISFSI Operations Specialist 2 Program Manager 1 ISFSI Administrator I Licensing Engineer 1 Security Manager 1 20 6.2 DECOMMISSIONING GENERAL CONTRACTOR The DGC will be responsible for all of the physical work. The staff will oversee the work crews.,

schedule work and supply HP support. The DGC will be responsible for finishing the project on time and on budget. Table 7-2 provides a summary of the DGC staff.

Page 12 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 TABLE 6-2 DOC STAFF 2012 Person Base Position Salary Level Project Superintendent $148,000 1.00 QA Auditor/Inspector $70,000 1.00 Health &Safety Supervisor $117,000 1.00 Packaging/Shipping Specialist $70,000 1.00 Cost Control Accountant $55,000 1.00 Scheduler II $60,000 1.00 Demolition Specialist $86,000 1,00 Industrial Safety $86,000 1.00 Engineering Supervisor $117,000 1.00 Project Supervisor $79,000 1.00 Decontamination Tech $55,000 2.00 Instrumentation Tech $55,000 1.00 Tool Crib Attendant $43,000 1.00 14.00 6.3 SECURITY Once spent fuel has been removed from the site the security force will be significantly reduced.

This estimate assumes a force of 13 guards and one manager. This will allow a security person level of 5 guards during work time and two guards all other times. The guard force was assumed to consist of various levels of guards and the rate used has been adjusted accordingly.

Page 13 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 7.0 References

1. R.S. Means, Inc, Building ConstructionCost Data, Kingston, Massachusetts, 2012.

2. Regulatory Guide 1.202, "Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors"

3. NUREG- 1713, "Standard Review Plan for Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors"

4. NUREG-1757, "Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance, Financial Assurance, Recordkeeping and Timeliness" Page. 14 of 15

Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 APPENDIX A Page 15 of 15

lJ001,12010 400 3AA.0*0 720 00 20

• W-.40 7i04000 M ý 4 YOoo.441.*00.W 4 7*004 0240020 2A.07.4 0.70 . 14..4 411WOMAN2420 1103t.11 0200%

12.74.2Oa 204760 pl~o M02.

4.0.VaM449I4,wO0 0<4".2 00-W104060 so SO 2 so w0 a

`A`Wý* $W0.41 62*6000 20.14*12 4620200 S'A*,x R=Aad2 3 a.

4.o.001200.40 103W50 a.*otoa 11,11tW7 6120*7 005120 Coot's a 20 ml..00102 04.7031 SMSSW2 6,04of 00060 003004 00106.20 1000*0 2046170 04*0247 1020,1 stiboo 01,123*2 so atm S0=2O0 02111.736 2100 MI.202l 104 010 -I 000.0 ...0.dm2 4.190414 222000000%I01l S0<22,m2

-I WTI0.2.1 20.7.0 $314.0 1120110 56.0 1 M7 s0% 17200

'20,1 MAY0 001*t4 In?7, '040% S32.016 tart I 00.1 20.c 00.0 10,20.70 0002 0IN.0I =10% 12420.0 9,0114 0020~ t20007 t0.o020 atom tO20lO 1 wes 00o71 oo.n0, 02,20A t'20.21t SK.0 tU. 020.20 200,00 205,~ 1 HIM2 0IN0 0220

- RAT 0.00

'051 14I.1 0SAY =A` 62%

062111K) 'M07 0 MAT "201 0`m.2% MAN02 Ifl I l.16-1,010

• 2 10 a I007 o, 022%mnn *7 6612 02040 02, 207 ismos 01 oooo ar 0

• 0ww $a 00 0OT% 006*1 St Ila.

00 0I4O Mon.  %,2` A.m 4 I0M20 I VWS*04 SIS.MA own.00 03."folad 40,604 020I 202% 07, SM20= MO2.62 14402 seal

-I-0 OW314 00116 2.G0 006 120100 "Is 2nd 072040-2 1,200M &,MAO2 207.02 022.20 1.14 O-o.oý SM ON, 1072*20 20100 24.10 204.00 #iM10.00 S1200.200, 00001 000 04.to1 aO.2"20 tg040 260.12000146, 2714 Roo,

'14027 SM4,0

~

CI20404.4 0270 06070 462760 MAN20 wars 0,I, s144*0 MAN00 0400020 1.o.0" I004.I N- 1200000 W I'll.0 ;a13 I0I 20 0n*2 0.20 fthod".202 976460 045.70 020.20 SUP" 000440 0000 0200 000.20% 174,12 0.0MI:0 Po0.o40200a T-oo SU0.2 0207 0202%  %"Am0 06.117 W301.1 l2171 W02040 "a"o OI lo UMC.0020-.l 000 W0.4 000.70 I00m02 172= 0.2007

$'.20034 14.11419 072 W00402000 SOON*2 612m,40 I-P004200002 12020* 20674607 27,14- ?24 ý 1 W000.2 MIT 0I% 600 0.I00A,"

Ulm+o Ivan mo'lOIy SMA4 Im,7I 1

Sm2.00 107,0 0MA00 002.7 010tAM U01917 ,.0400 W4.60 71-3

$;.3 33£2 S 'IN0 STAN2

00 01 - I 3m, 03 3.- 05 - -

3403230 0033~-~'

OOpmo.3oo.l.oo.J 43 10 Will0 3k~0030 `1V3 31

1. 9 91359 0 a 1*07041 403 5lf

~04~.*04 $739 5332 WAN9 IWO4 m30" 5330320 1 M( w29 I 10309 134.1 1 u XMI 1"A 403733290~ma~ 3 0160,50 WAN~

I "As3 134.

910 NO 0to 03-3307- s3m03 a23 I $2,M7 53.4 34,51230 3m003 330.4010 303 - 4.. ý a.", - 41s 13M3 O 3343 31901 0o 03 03

. ,3 3 630 Dow-.

TIM39 W'dI 10404235 2 Ii3ýVa 030 30t 21 023 3.0 039 33 2'3431 273 332 3 9 51 003M.014--. 02 33

1. 40*

MW10 21.7 "034 A4? u+, yt

+ o m ",i lllvoJ s a l;~l o m171**

.1" 1l 42+.s+ s*l w0 a3 sIOM4 sVM4.

333 w..,sO.4oo.m,.323a..012 52i 0314 7+07 0014 41*03 535323914534 40 5.004 320 030303 $MM' 3523 Vil 030m145 7 2.004 20

1. 13~ 00 3o2 7032l 310 0733 0 3 244o Ulm31 MM92 1303 00., 0 43.3 u4l3 03039 3 37003330033314 3 332.s*0.,Ss.oa. "loioo C- oftw* +m,,

331*0*433033 o0.0 M#90 I3ll04 O,*co04 3-3 73.1931070.3 3 53930m0309o53.3 3 0.14040o3134532 0 050000 'a. 84,14 009*?404 45 3

$1444,2+' Wl0l 4 13 7153140032 090301403.333534 035.4 14533

.400395 033 93323 00 D.W N703 140M 03104 U.11m0990 342 003321039020425435 1449 539,53 t W- VIA",

093 3 03m~w.03 3 3234s104s0.9, 3 #00303030~ 00 33 30190*43100934 7 0964333 00103540 I 419390200 3 *300,..19302.1*m Will SILO 3,3foaI 43.3..302 2 0533330090* 10 was053329321 33310505333037000 3 055320444.0433 1034- 50 T9 esrdt 2 lmsO.

0007 73433 0 35333 0 3190

YOVMM RIa 66410D CostFafr, DIMA6S 00..4foý 0*40. 0. 74 S-16. 20 0. 4..

~ ~ ~~

04.0 W464. 1 440 4

~ lW

~ I a

~ 404 4i

~ 00 0

~

0t'..04 71.01 0

~ *4 6

~ ~ 606 a

0 .

1.6 alS0.M0l OL.0 r., a- W.A.. D4.2140 lb.Y14LWO Xd40* YA404 Y.0*1 2.0*0*0 X00*1* *.1 C.4

• CI Q. .

ii4 I00.Q *40 A-ds00 SWO 27 046040 4,4400 46096~d 4ll l"4 o 13AKU 7.90 4 4 I ~~ 046 4 ~ ZI 0 ~ ~ 04.60.4*

0200 4.043761 093 n .4 a*a~

1,41SWO 4dfto. aft 6. SMA106 U1=3212 l 17*

IA 1 IN0 VIM32 ntT'm' I 4.063" 6 80.4 WAm WasP.404W ..VW -

I 04041010a..*4 mmo mOmS O wm 70406..0ww I CW3*1 mm.4 SON i0m,*0*.

I SWISS,1 00 am WM',s6.d 4 On..k" No6 "m VAS, 4k06404 Sin 0412w.00 sbo-dw 2 COW0S so4w SlIZ3 27 sla66ad I S 0047114*411.P4.44,.

144l46666 *14,40, 010.664 $10.40 $,A"6 1.0.1 000404.441 163+0 .606 1466 0.4..0,M0. 140,.

144 4.0404.0.00. 6.96 I am7 123 0.n404.4007.mn.6.4.o 66 I) 10.14.1.041364..t...1*mn. am I Do 04 6.40041.66 1.4045so A.6 8.00 sas SO 01= PAW "4,41l B 40M 166 B "MI 53AM0 4m 24 143 7* O oam 4 $I-4 SIAM I.N6 1.66 Il 6667640436~44404a SIA 17.6 6 6 9. 6 6 7044

$I"0.0 07406 477 410 411 0 0 0 2.1TI I Ia a WS. Slnw S1S SAM so0 62wea 0 M I II 7.166.10.14004. 4.71 73 0 77.0 AO-.o 6.1 44.0014L-6 1441 0 4ft. 6 . mt 7067, sF4. 66404* Lb - .- N.666~U 066R 060 nom 01.., ~~ 0m 0m ~ ~ 00=0076 666 Sa 60N.76 "All9 IN66 6 4

.6 2w4 ma 0,0 a.0 1

I 4,00 Vi1 0404 t4026606.610306.1.0* l~*0.o.,1s.,.4.c.614a~.*.

0 4?1 427.40 0,4t III." So 4 71.41 01640. . A O g*om Sa I'm6 14211 36 Um0 64.010 06.210 714.4* 006 61 641644144, 7 .14R0041 3*4. *4. 4 .nf II 061.404.76 4.

a.. S6.~ iA K196M US30 1 .6 SA 4 1264 0INS70I144 I SA0ID *6 0400 4.601, 411 1 2640 6.6444

'm6 2

- 66406. 05

'-s 1 +4010*0n 70M.-0 Tr-tsO. .$ Tml 0.. .640 ,6 , .. .0.., 073403 4.44 174 6..n. 4146.. 0

• 4 96 10,451 foll1o1 64 40 S1i.l8 1.40+0 0 ON S,406661 166 266s0 46.0a4 1731 6.366m01,o.04.

6.4666401~

4..1o~.4...1.

74. 66OSW64 ~ 2614 404.0 low0 066N 706.0 W.7 a6064 014010,4 9611r.0 66 064*14m 66 1403. , 136.066 Mw.66 16.0 '630 m 647.

130 463 .44.o6011402...0.14*4 *7.90.60ko440..1*n06I0.cc4.0 WU- WsltoI k* id W ý C~lkr*

ý %*Ji*Tlll s4 ok.

I Im TW1L $

N0

• .P+ul~m 0m 52.31~e 6"Mi $246"A U.l~.+

0 420 son 640036 am 70 .,.1 0

1.732 SSW . A 6e7 166 6I 6.96 4.140 2T.12 426444 044231 MWA12 6 oo oo 0 .o 1.1fo1 o4 M6% +/-121 a, 0.4 I , I SO1W&A 1.11,032 2306" SOST 4 9666S 66410Au =0lm 1 VA.4 R41.0ve 44 .7 -M I* .41 . 0317 S316.6 S1.166.44 SO S`JM.W 61=463 4 0 4 . 17316 4.00150A 6To-06% 667 113 MIN20 76 ,4 430 44 6.44146666 11144.0..dI *4 wmO*4444.6t.1,6.4*00 14.0.o..

+ 600o*11 35 *o 1"-1 S4MAO 040el3 m.6666% 0 6A4 Cbo.37 N N 110

.100"~~*640 .Is 06*4460.wMIASm M: $1.12M S 614 13 0341, MI A4IS 1. 7119 =7

74000700.00 (700 tol 02.04 40, Ijod (.7. 1.00 A000~400.00 7.00 l...0060.6470 .000 0040 40. 0o. W~o Wa 4.0 Co~0 .00.. We W.0 o. e 00 0*000 71004000 Co.0 720.4020*1 704.* P.01.0, Maki- Qa4kof wifto.3,O Xd-6 X3OhM 0000.70 740O0.( 7600017 allamadd, 7*000 n. rd0 0. C0Q (60s~ Vh 714 0~h 0*1070

.. Fa,,

a..* 700400. 1.00000. l0.0.0 ft 0*W-,. W0Pt0070. - 0434.~ 0. -

i 00 00 iSO 03 0o00 0.M0o41 103,41700

74. 00002 00.?a- '0,* fi74 00 amn .m dadn fv*,

1 7000020 wal 00 M ?a.

"?0 O00 Unit3 401.1407 'jade 0'A 0040 0034 am 0 "0 "0. Inlj 03?

1121 01200,o0 U00.60,04)

In

,00 Ill. 1. 0 00340 00 M20 salad Mainto RLF Radial 6.0. Lat 22MM 1.0* 03e7 2IT12NIm-Z 1 MWI 0110 7.07 1.2" _,Ote. Iill SA 21112RSt Alia* 31" 3,ntt 30213

- 70,- ..

00011ý 24 0 2M in 1,mN im da a

i amo sld 71a IIAool

""W 70001 Ohs 0013

• .1 07 13 A 3,6 'AD¢ 0 O S4tl *,lq a ad0.7 $0 0 00  %%,4"4 00 00 000.0 034)7S is 0.0..0,. 0 00 100 1.00 000. ad7100,0740 070400 smO."

A WS 01.0 60 .0 oat Os.40,. 7.O a- IS.0.

446 0734 w3 w.7070.0477 4403 V7 a0 070 00.00 0*In *na 230%00

.a-. i*s70*

0 020 7 "06 ad00000 Ohs 004400 10

0. Sano.oo 012.1 407.0 W0040 46.an a 4M iJ0 01.0, 0N 0 000.000 SM140 so 00734 $46,334 204" 00 I7 u 04sm ON.I~faU00 A0040.0... 04,60t., 0,h.000000000000070000007 0.00 0040 0034 I So0 0.00o001*34020, .0.14*10005W.0300010000000*044400074 ft00 212050S 14 A,. 70ws l t0* 0401, 0 0.0 4000.07 MAX)4 lan" adn 00 a00000 0.0 003 0 0077 S 04 an3 is4, 6 1, o 001.04o I .0 072074.700700 0 soJ L, 1304 07. A0D2 soO 200 51.9210 a $,A 74am0,41 03 Omw, ad. T,,s7.

04.

000 00 10.04 B a in RAF7 490 0005 wild0 ad 5030.7%0 S01020 $1MAIS WWo~4.O AN00.0. 7.0ft 70070, .0,0.. 74

,0 0034i 0704.20l 02Mlm

• 41(.7 707700 ft-- 27.010. 00*

Am l7o003 .0034% 2s.a0 420 0.360 In'CA N

00000 ft 04 coos 012000 7o~0.m00.4 00 IVAII an, Ul.m0 uAn

,is., .4 0,10 007 F05 000f70 11704 17.00.00 -3000% 140 2034 00.04* I IM 277.0s003 30272..04. hoo.0000o,00U0bh .0.0007400010.004,.2 000 hsom* o 0

o~oo so~o s4eine4 so,¢ si03 sooo

00. 96 ONRA 00400.

r."

am000.4 3 0.00

,Aid ldiý 7004 In 743 0700 001.0 w020 0

0 0th 000,o0 0000s*000 S

3 4m-. 24 k'a 10.3 007*00,0 0o0 7020*047.00*

teal Sloe Aelowod Moalt INcA.. 45.4 tOo..,o.J2.* 74o2.4 tMO, lAoo. 5001200 tON... tt*. W*. tt..o. CO5.A*. .50W... 001200 tO...

loW LI.o0S$7.eOOSANe,, Ileoy~ tlalm. ~2(A5 WWYoUi00 Y*aAOO SiM-lofl CA..ofl TM-S TM-SOT *4.5,57 SiosCos Toe 00,4 COIl 152 PS.57W451*.SoaiS*wI '0 n~ S in S StO00tiMI itO 1 2 4oOI*..M-2 seWos o..M-.o U .. n 0. 54243434 I0 so itO 0'5.WRtiOO$25*0W00 flf.otoeojto..o.AW.I.O.,$*

i.5t Qin.... A 57,42 IN 41.42 em om Om 0m0 to m ON mom 5 SZg04 52 34 55 U $2 W447.4

%2ý0 Iii., e04 - m Mm.*I 0.001 f l fUmmrm s l

• i0+.

Wm a o, ' iXU 2

9-4 a a 4142 WOS an bt415. V M.S 44404.426i*w t2StSt

ýt. tt.

s,44434.A.,0.4 hAWK, 7.2 m0 .a$2wi

.1elW 811*43434~I 434* 2 3t4.WA2ON2$A13123 4 0010 U=m &MN $"AN5W 5W =J7 54.3,7 Wm e 45UPA45.M-.4M NO43 Wl.029-+i*44M-

• 7o 5 *WPm4eW~alm 1 ol WOO Wore WNPaWOl 3487.2 ~OmOttM-Mzt S*i.ot$4.

I 4.SW T.*M Wore 54.#..d4.t.02*..Wa*m VA VAVP&Ald 4U4M-2 ~r WLN gmm 41724 m1.as+-sm W. w43 Sis

$MI 34S4.44 Sý .,I.- "AW 51.200 4,7. m on. Il o emi~o b In

BYR 2012-043 ENCLOSURE 2 CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL ASSURANCE December 2012

CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL ASSURANCE NRC Licensee:

Yankee Atomic Electric Company Yankee Rowe Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation NRC License No. DPR-3 (NRC Docket Nos.50-029 and 72-31) 49 Yankee Road Rowe, MA 01367 Issued to: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Certification:

I hereby certify that Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC) is the licensee for the Yankee Rowe Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (Yankee Rowe ISFSI) and that 1,the undersigned, am authorized to provide this Certification of Financial Assurance with respect to the radiological decommissioning of the Yankee Rowe ISFSI.

During the operation of this ISFSI, spent nuclear fuel and Greater than Class C waste will be stored at the Yankee Rowe ISFSI in storage casks licensed under 10 CFR 72. Pursuant to contracts with the Department of Energy the spent fuel and associated casks will ultimately be removed from the ISFSI location, and YAEC will dispose of other radiological waste in accordance with NRC regulations, at which time the Yankee Rowe ISFSI will be decommissioned in accordance with NRC regulations.

I further certify that financial assurance in an amount sufficient to fund Yankee Rowe ISFSI radiological decommissioning at the time of such decommissioning has been provided, pursuant to 10 CFR 72.30, as described in the letter to which this Certification is attached. That radiological decommissioning funding assurance is premised on a site-specific decommissioning cost estimate and funding methodology described therein, in the amount of:

Yankee Rowe ISFSI $ 8.5 million (inclusive of contingency)

Carla M. Pizzella Yankee Atomic Electric Compa Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer Phone (860) 267-6426 x304 Corporate Seal Date \I& \'/ k

BYR 2012-043 ENCLOSURE 3 TOTAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE YANKEE ROWE ISFSI, INCLUDING COST ESTIMATE FOR MANAGING IRRADIATED FUEL AND GTCC WASTE December 2012

Yankee Atomic Electric Company Irradiated Fuel & GTCC Waste Management and ISFSI Decom Estimate Represented in 2013 Dollars Data FERC Summarv Sum of 2013 Sum of 2014 Sum of 2015 Sum of 2016 Sum of 2017 Sum of 2018 Sum of 2019 Sum of 2020 Sum of 2021 Sum of 2022 2013-2022

i. - -

Contingency $357,690 $343,148 $353,128 $375,690 $375,315 $325,315 $727,380 $747,630 $0 $514,798 $4,120,094 Insurance $431,000 $537,667 $431,000 $431,000 $431,000 $431,000 $431,000 $431,000 $0 $1,054,000 $4,608,667 Labor - Non-Manual $1,600,750 $1,600,750 $1,600,750 $1,600,750 $1,600,750 $1,600,750 $1,600,750 $1,620,750 $0 $1,024,750 $13,850,750 Labor - Security $2,380,000 $2,380,000 $2,380,000 $2,380,000 $2,380,000 $2,380,000 $2,380,000 $2,380,000 $0 $0 $19,040,000 Materials & Supplies $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $0 $20,000 $620,000 Miscellaneous $80,950 $80,950 $80,950 $80,950 $80,950 $80,950 $80,950 $80,950 $0 $38,700 $686,300 Outside Services - A&G $528,100 $720,600 $776,850 $1,478,100 $1,470,600 $470,600 $478,100 $470,600 $0 $577,530 $6,971,080 Outside Services - Fuel Loading $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $260,000 $700,000 $0 $0 $960,000 Outside Services - ISFSI OP's $438,000 $548,000 $548,000 $548,000 $548,000 $548,000 $548,000 $548,000 $0 $75,000 $4,349,000 Outside Services - Legal $900,000 $200,000 $450,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $700,000 $450,000 $0 $1,600,000 $4,900,000 Outside Services - NON-RAD D&D of ISFSI $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,370,719 $0 $1,370,719 Outside Services - RAD D&D of ISFSI $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,723,604 $0 $8,723,604 Property Taxes $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $0 $100,000 $2,180,000 Regulatory Fees $390,000 $390,000 $390,000 $390,000 $390,000 $390,000 $390,000 $390,000 $0 $598,000 $3,718,000 Utilities $70000 $70000 $70.000 $70000 $70000 $70.000 $70.000 $70.000 $0 $60000 $620,000 Grand Total $7,511,490 $7,206,115 $7,415,678 $7,889,490 $7,881,615 $6,831,615 $8,001,180 $8,223,930 $10,094,323 $5,662,778 $76,718,214 Note 1: The cost of management of irradiated fuel and GTCC waste is calculated as follows:

$76,718,214 Grand Total from Above

($1,370,719) Non-Rad D&D ISFSI

( Rad D&D ISFSI

$66,623,891 Management of Irradiated Fuel and GTCC Waste Note 2: The cost of RAD and NON-RAD D&D of the ISFSI in 2013 dollars as provided in the column labeled "Sum of 2021" is derived by escalating the value of the cost estimates provided in Enclosure 1 by 2.5%.