ML16125A014: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558) | NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558) | ||
Hi Mitch, By application dated April 4, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. | Hi Mitch, By application dated April 4, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16110A266), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
ML16110A266), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence. | ||
If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-0489. | If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-0489. | ||
| Line 44: | Line 43: | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558) | NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558) | ||
Hi Mitch, By application dated April 4, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. | Hi Mitch, By application dated April 4, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16110A266), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
ML16110A266), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence. | ||
If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-0489. | If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-0489. | ||
Revision as of 04:03, 5 February 2020
| ML16125A014 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello  |
| Issue date: | 05/03/2016 |
| From: | Audrey Klett Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Hanek O Florida Power & Light Co |
| References | |
| MF7557, MF7558 | |
| Download: ML16125A014 (2) | |
Text
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Klett, Audrey Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:04 PM To: 'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com' Cc: 'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)
Subject:
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)
Hi Mitch, By application dated April 4, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16110A266), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-0489.
Audrey Klett Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 301-415-0489 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2818 Mail Envelope Properties (Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov20160503170300)
Subject:
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)
Sent Date: 5/3/2016 5:03:30 PM Received Date: 5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM From: Klett, Audrey Created By: Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov Recipients:
"'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None
"'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com'" <Mitch.Guth@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1560 5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Klett, Audrey Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:04 PM To: 'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com' Cc: 'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)
Subject:
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)
Hi Mitch, By application dated April 4, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16110A266), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-0489.
Audrey Klett Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 301-415-0489 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2818 Mail Envelope Properties (Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov20160503170300)
Subject:
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)
Sent Date: 5/3/2016 5:03:30 PM Received Date: 5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM From: Klett, Audrey Created By: Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov Recipients:
"'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None
"'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com'" <Mitch.Guth@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1560 5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: