ML19046A112: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NRG FO R M 699 (03-20 1 3) SUMM A R Y. (C o nt i nued from page 1) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULA T ORY COMM I SSIO N C ON V ER S AT IO N RE COR D (co ntinu ed) On January 17 , 2019 , GNF-A participated on a phone call with the NRC staff (thereafter, the staff) to clarify questions related to the request for supplemental information (RSI) related to the revalidation recommendation request from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) for the Model No. TK-C69 transportation package. The discussion was focused on RSis Th-2 , Th-4, and Th-5. the following is a summary of the discussion with GNF-A: RSI-Th-2 and Th-4 GNF-A asked if this question is similar to the requirement in Part 71 , to demonstrate that the package will stand temperature changes from ambient temperatures to extreme cold and heat conditions. The staff pointed out that the evaluation for the package should include the effects of thermal stresses to the package under extreme cold and heat conditions as required in the IAEA regulations.
{{#Wiki_filter:.JI i  \ \.
Therefore , the applicant needs to provide information about the performance of the package under these conditions. In terms Th-4 , GNF-A mentioned that paragraph 653(b) is applicable to Type B packages and the Model No. TK-C69 would be transporting Type A contents. The staff mentioned that there is an RSI question related to confirm the type on content to be transported in the Model No. TK-C69 , just to confirm that the package will be used to transport only Type A material.
NRG FORM 699 **<>"''"''-,.                                        U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION            DATE OF SIGNATURE f)
RSI -Th-5 GNF-A asked if this question was focused on providing information regarding the effects of thermal stresses in the package at extreme heat conditions , since Chapter 3 of the application does not include this information. The staff pointed out that the applicant should explain how the thermal evaluation considered gaps between components and identify these gaps in its response. The staff mentioned that adding a statement in the application about these items should be sufficient at the acceptance review phase. GNF-A agreed to verify if the need of this action has changed and to provide an estimated time frame in which it would submit the RSI responses.
(03-2013)
NRG FORM 699 (03-2 0 1 3) Page 2 of 2}}
                      -;.-+,, ,
CONVERSATION RECORD NAME OF PERSON($) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU                                        DATE OF CONTACT    TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL Kirstein, Erik S; GE Power                                                                  01/1712019 0  TELEPHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS                                                                          TELEPHONE NUMBER 0  INCOMING Erik.kirstein@ge.com                                                                        (910) 819-5365          D OUTGOING ORGANIZATION                                                        DOCKET NUMBER($)
GNF-A                                                                71-3093 LICENSE NUMBER($)                                                    CONTROL NUMBER($)
NIA                                                                NIA SUBJECT 1/1712019, 2:00 PM - CONFERENCE CALL TO DISCUSS CLAR1FICATION QUESTIONS REGARDING REQUESTS FOR SUPPLEMENTAL INFOMATION (THERMAL EVALUATION) MODEL NO. TK-C69 (DOCKET NO. 71-3093)
 
==SUMMARY==
 
Attendees:
GNF-A\GE Power (TVEL's Representative in the U.S.):
Erik Kirstein, Senior Nuclear Packaging Engineer NRC:
Jimmy Chang, Thermal Reviewer Norma Garcia Santos, Project Manager Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)
GNF-A would provide a time frame in which it would be submitting the response to the supplemental information. GNF-A also agreed to provide an update of the need date to complete this action. The staff noted that it could not commit to any dates at this time.
Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSff/pN Norma Nfia Santos, Jimmy Chang,/ and Erik Ki7t NRC FOR9(03-2013)
                                        ,_/
Page 1   of    2
 
NRG FORM 699                                                                                    U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (03-2013)
CONVERSAT ION RECORD (continued)
 
==SUMMARY==
. (Continued from page 1)
On January 17, 2019, GNF-A participated on a phone call with the NRC staff (thereafter, the staff) to clarify questions related to the request for supplemental information (RSI) related to the revalidation recommendation request from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) for the Model No. TK-C69 transportation package. The discussion was focused on RSis Th-2, Th-4, and Th-5 .
the following is a summary of the discussion with GNF-A :
RSI-Th-2 and Th-4 GNF-A asked if this question is similar to the requirement in Part 71 , to demonstrate that the package will stand temperature changes from ambient temperatures to extreme cold and heat conditions. The staff pointed out that the evaluation for the package should include the effects of thermal stresses to the package under extreme cold and heat conditions as required in the IAEA regulations.
Therefore, the applicant needs to provide information about the performance of the package under these conditions. In terms ofRSI-Th-4, GNF-A mentioned that paragraph 653(b) is applicable to Type B packages and the Model No. TK-C69 would be transporting Type A contents. The staff mentioned that there is an RSI question related to confirm the type on content to be transported in the Model No. TK-C69, just to confirm that the package will be used to transport only Type A material.
RSI -Th-5 GNF-A asked if this question was focused on providing information regarding the effects of thermal stresses in the package at extreme heat conditions, since Chapter 3 of the application does not include this information. The staff pointed out that the applicant should explain how the thermal evaluation considered gaps between components and identify these gaps in its response.
The staff mentioned that adding a statement in the application about these items should be sufficient at the acceptance review phase.
GNF-A agreed to verify if the need of this action has changed and to provide an estimated time frame in which it would submit the RSI responses.
NRG FORM 699 (03-2013)
Page 2 of     2}}

Latest revision as of 12:30, 2 February 2020

2/14/2019, Conversation Record with K. Erik S/Ge Power Conference Call to Discuss Clarification Questions Regarding Requests for Supplemental Information (Thermal Evaluation) Model No. TK-C69 (Dkt No. 71-3093), Conv. Held on January 17, 201
ML19046A112
Person / Time
Site: 07103093
Issue date: 02/14/2019
From: Garcia-Santos N
Spent Fuel Licensing Branch
To: Kirstein E
GE Power
Garcia-Santos N
References
Download: ML19046A112 (2)


Text

.JI i \ \.

NRG FORM 699 **<>""-,. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE f)

(03-2013)

-;.-+,, ,

CONVERSATION RECORD NAME OF PERSON($) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU DATE OF CONTACT TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL Kirstein, Erik S; GE Power 01/1712019 0 TELEPHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER 0 INCOMING Erik.kirstein@ge.com (910) 819-5365 D OUTGOING ORGANIZATION DOCKET NUMBER($)

GNF-A 71-3093 LICENSE NUMBER($) CONTROL NUMBER($)

NIA NIA SUBJECT 1/1712019, 2:00 PM - CONFERENCE CALL TO DISCUSS CLAR1FICATION QUESTIONS REGARDING REQUESTS FOR SUPPLEMENTAL INFOMATION (THERMAL EVALUATION) MODEL NO. TK-C69 (DOCKET NO. 71-3093)

SUMMARY

Attendees:

GNF-A\GE Power (TVEL's Representative in the U.S.):

Erik Kirstein, Senior Nuclear Packaging Engineer NRC:

Jimmy Chang, Thermal Reviewer Norma Garcia Santos, Project Manager Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)

GNF-A would provide a time frame in which it would be submitting the response to the supplemental information. GNF-A also agreed to provide an update of the need date to complete this action. The staff noted that it could not commit to any dates at this time.

Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSff/pN Norma Nfia Santos, Jimmy Chang,/ and Erik Ki7t NRC FOR9(03-2013)

,_/

Page 1 of 2

NRG FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (03-2013)

CONVERSAT ION RECORD (continued)

SUMMARY

. (Continued from page 1)

On January 17, 2019, GNF-A participated on a phone call with the NRC staff (thereafter, the staff) to clarify questions related to the request for supplemental information (RSI) related to the revalidation recommendation request from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) for the Model No. TK-C69 transportation package. The discussion was focused on RSis Th-2, Th-4, and Th-5 .

the following is a summary of the discussion with GNF-A :

RSI-Th-2 and Th-4 GNF-A asked if this question is similar to the requirement in Part 71 , to demonstrate that the package will stand temperature changes from ambient temperatures to extreme cold and heat conditions. The staff pointed out that the evaluation for the package should include the effects of thermal stresses to the package under extreme cold and heat conditions as required in the IAEA regulations.

Therefore, the applicant needs to provide information about the performance of the package under these conditions. In terms ofRSI-Th-4, GNF-A mentioned that paragraph 653(b) is applicable to Type B packages and the Model No. TK-C69 would be transporting Type A contents. The staff mentioned that there is an RSI question related to confirm the type on content to be transported in the Model No. TK-C69, just to confirm that the package will be used to transport only Type A material.

RSI -Th-5 GNF-A asked if this question was focused on providing information regarding the effects of thermal stresses in the package at extreme heat conditions, since Chapter 3 of the application does not include this information. The staff pointed out that the applicant should explain how the thermal evaluation considered gaps between components and identify these gaps in its response.

The staff mentioned that adding a statement in the application about these items should be sufficient at the acceptance review phase.

GNF-A agreed to verify if the need of this action has changed and to provide an estimated time frame in which it would submit the RSI responses.

NRG FORM 699 (03-2013)

Page 2 of 2