ML051780296: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/26/2002
| issue date = 04/26/2002
| title = E-mail from R. Landsman to J. Craig, Dresden Crane Issue
| title = E-mail from R. Landsman to J. Craig, Dresden Crane Issue
| author name = Landsman R B
| author name = Landsman R
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| addressee name = Craig J W
| addressee name = Craig J
| addressee affiliation = NRC/EDO
| addressee affiliation = NRC/EDO
| docket = 05000237, 05000249
| docket = 05000237, 05000249
| license number = DPR-019, DPR-025
| license number = DPR-019, DPR-025
| contact person = Pedersen R M, OE
| contact person = Pedersen R, OE
| case reference number = DPO-2003-100
| case reference number = DPO-2003-100
| document type = Differing Professional Opinion Case File, E-Mail
| document type = Differing Professional Opinion Case File, E-Mail
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_~l T rs e Crnsu ~~ Page 15 From: Ross Landsman I I To: John Craig Otto Date: 4/26102 11:43AM  
{{#Wiki_filter:_~l T     rs         e   Crnsu                 ~~                                                             Page 15 From:               Ross Landsman       II To:                 John Craig Otto Date:               4/26102 11:43AM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Dresden Crane Issue John, your E-mail to me dated 2115102 indicated to me that the issues would be resolved prior to Dresden loading a cask. They weren't. Rill let Dresden start loading a cask last night with all the technical issues unresolved.
Dresden Crane Issue John, your E-mail to me dated 2115102 indicated to me that the issues would be resolved prior to Dresden loading a cask. They weren't. Rill let Dresden start loading a cask last night with all the technical issues unresolved. I still have no responses from NRR or Rill to my DPV issued 5123101, nor the backfit issued 9/28/01.
I still have no responses from NRR or Rill to my DPV issued 5123101, nor the backfit issued 9/28/01.The issues are: the seismic issues regarding the reactor building superstructure (see DPV), the trolley is not seismic nor has any design calculations per the licensee (see licensee's RAI response dated 4/12102), the two lifting yokes are not seismic and do not meet ANSI N14.6 requirements (the cask might fall off the yokes) (see all the paperwork), the cask transfer facility (CTF) lift beam is not single failure proof as we require (see DPV), the CTF welds do not meet code (do not have weld records or QC records) and therefore the CTF shouldn't be used (see DPV), and the issue discovered at Fitzpatrick (moving a cask without the lid on) is not resolved at Dresden (new issue).CC: Jim Dyer; William Travers}}
The issues are: the seismic issues regarding the reactor building superstructure (see DPV), the trolley is not seismic nor has any design calculations per the licensee (see licensee's RAI response dated 4/12102),
the two lifting yokes are not seismic and do not meet ANSI N14.6 requirements (the cask might fall off the yokes) (see all the paperwork), the cask transfer facility (CTF) lift beam is not single failure proof as we require (see DPV), the CTF welds do not meet code (do not have weld records or QC records) and therefore the CTF shouldn't be used (see DPV), and the issue discovered at Fitzpatrick (moving a cask without the lid on) is not resolved at Dresden (new issue).
CC:                 Jim Dyer; William Travers}}

Latest revision as of 01:15, 24 November 2019

E-mail from R. Landsman to J. Craig, Dresden Crane Issue
ML051780296
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/2002
From: Landsman R
NRC/RGN-III
To: Jocelyn Craig
NRC/EDO
Pedersen R, OE
References
DPO-2003-100
Download: ML051780296 (1)
v • d • e


Text

_~l T rs e Crnsu ~~ Page 15 From: Ross Landsman II To: John Craig Otto Date: 4/26102 11:43AM

Subject:

Dresden Crane Issue John, your E-mail to me dated 2115102 indicated to me that the issues would be resolved prior to Dresden loading a cask. They weren't. Rill let Dresden start loading a cask last night with all the technical issues unresolved. I still have no responses from NRR or Rill to my DPV issued 5123101, nor the backfit issued 9/28/01.

The issues are: the seismic issues regarding the reactor building superstructure (see DPV), the trolley is not seismic nor has any design calculations per the licensee (see licensee's RAI response dated 4/12102),

the two lifting yokes are not seismic and do not meet ANSI N14.6 requirements (the cask might fall off the yokes) (see all the paperwork), the cask transfer facility (CTF) lift beam is not single failure proof as we require (see DPV), the CTF welds do not meet code (do not have weld records or QC records) and therefore the CTF shouldn't be used (see DPV), and the issue discovered at Fitzpatrick (moving a cask without the lid on) is not resolved at Dresden (new issue).

CC: Jim Dyer; William Travers

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML051780296&oldid=2198366"