ML16141A025: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML16141A025
| number = ML16141A025
| issue date = 05/05/2016
| issue date = 05/05/2016
| title = Susquehanna Steam Electric Station - Non-Concurrence for Susquehanna TSTF-425 LAR (NCP-2016-005) Sections a, B, and C
| title = Non-Concurrence for Susquehanna TSTF-425 LAR (NCP-2016-005) Sections a, B, and C
| author name = Miller G E
| author name = Miller G
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 13
| page count = 13
| project = CAC:MF5151, CAC:MF5152
| project = CAC:MF5151, CAC:MF5152
| stage = Other
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NCP-2016-005 Section C As the NCP Approver, I have read and considered the submission from EEEB staf Prior to discussion of the issues, I would like to acknowledge the work of the EEEB staff and recognize that it is good that they are exercising their ability to register their concerns through the NRC's non-concurrence proces Summary of Issues The EEEB staff is objecting to the issuance of amendments to the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 licenses to implement TSTF-425 (Risk-Informed Surveillance Frequencies). The EEEB Non-concurrence has four core objections to the proposed license amendment request (LAR): 1. The proposed amendment would modify the Susquehanna Technical Specifications (TSs) in a manner that doesn't meet the current licensing basis of Susquehanna and NRC regulatory requirement Specifically, General Design Criterion (GDC) 17, GDC 18, 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3), and 10 CFR Appendix B Criterion II . The Topical Report (TR) Safety Evaluation (SE) was not reviewed by the Office of the General Counsel (OGC). 3. There are no backstops provided for the Surveillance Requirement (SR) frequencies that would be relocated to the licensee controlled documen . The proposed amendment is risk-based, not risk-informe Evaluation of Non-Concurrence The objections raised in this non-concurrence are identical to those raised by EEEB staff during the NRC review of a TSTF-425 LAR for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (NCP-2015-012). The non-concurrence, including the NRC's response to the non-concurrence is available under Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16033A19 As no new issues have been raised by the current non-concurrence, nor has additional technical justification for the issues been provided, I find that the previous resolution of the issues remains vali Thus, the NRC staff should proceed with issuance of the LAR.}}
{{#Wiki_filter:NCP-2016-005 Section C As the NCP Approver, I have read and considered the submission from EEEB staff. Prior to discussion of the issues, I would like to acknowledge the work of the EEEB staff and recognize that it is good that they are exercising their ability to register their concerns through the NRCs non-concurrence process.
Summary of Issues The EEEB staff is objecting to the issuance of amendments to the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 licenses to implement TSTF-425 (Risk-Informed Surveillance Frequencies). The EEEB Non-concurrence has four core objections to the proposed license amendment request (LAR):
: 1. The proposed amendment would modify the Susquehanna Technical Specifications (TSs) in a manner that doesnt meet the current licensing basis of Susquehanna and NRC regulatory requirements. Specifically, General Design Criterion (GDC) 17, GDC 18, 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3), and 10 CFR Appendix B Criterion III.
: 2. The Topical Report (TR) Safety Evaluation (SE) was not reviewed by the Office of the General Counsel (OGC).
: 3. There are no backstops provided for the Surveillance Requirement (SR) frequencies that would be relocated to the licensee controlled document.
: 4. The proposed amendment is risk-based, not risk-informed.
Evaluation of Non-Concurrence The objections raised in this non-concurrence are identical to those raised by EEEB staff during the NRC review of a TSTF-425 LAR for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (NCP-2015-012).
The non-concurrence, including the NRCs response to the non-concurrence is available under Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16033A197. As no new issues have been raised by the current non-concurrence, nor has additional technical justification for the issues been provided, I find that the previous resolution of the issues remains valid. Thus, the NRC staff should proceed with issuance of the LAR.}}

Latest revision as of 19:50, 30 October 2019

Non-Concurrence for Susquehanna TSTF-425 LAR (NCP-2016-005) Sections a, B, and C
ML16141A025
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/05/2016
From: Geoffrey Miller
Plant Licensing Branch II
To:
Susquehanna
Miller, G. E. LPLII-1
References
CAC MF5151, CAC MF5152, NCP-2016-005, TSTF-425
Download: ML16141A025 (13)


Text

NCP-2016-005 Section C As the NCP Approver, I have read and considered the submission from EEEB staff. Prior to discussion of the issues, I would like to acknowledge the work of the EEEB staff and recognize that it is good that they are exercising their ability to register their concerns through the NRCs non-concurrence process.

Summary of Issues The EEEB staff is objecting to the issuance of amendments to the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 licenses to implement TSTF-425 (Risk-Informed Surveillance Frequencies). The EEEB Non-concurrence has four core objections to the proposed license amendment request (LAR):

1. The proposed amendment would modify the Susquehanna Technical Specifications (TSs) in a manner that doesnt meet the current licensing basis of Susquehanna and NRC regulatory requirements. Specifically, General Design Criterion (GDC) 17, GDC 18, 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3), and 10 CFR Appendix B Criterion III.
2. The Topical Report (TR) Safety Evaluation (SE) was not reviewed by the Office of the General Counsel (OGC).
3. There are no backstops provided for the Surveillance Requirement (SR) frequencies that would be relocated to the licensee controlled document.
4. The proposed amendment is risk-based, not risk-informed.

Evaluation of Non-Concurrence The objections raised in this non-concurrence are identical to those raised by EEEB staff during the NRC review of a TSTF-425 LAR for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (NCP-2015-012).

The non-concurrence, including the NRCs response to the non-concurrence is available under Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16033A197. As no new issues have been raised by the current non-concurrence, nor has additional technical justification for the issues been provided, I find that the previous resolution of the issues remains valid. Thus, the NRC staff should proceed with issuance of the LAR.