ML18107A042: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/16/2018
| issue date = 04/16/2018
| title = Comment (008) of Janet Schlueter on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on PR-61 - Disposal of Greater-than-Class C and Transuranic Waste
| title = Comment (008) of Janet Schlueter on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on PR-61 - Disposal of Greater-than-Class C and Transuranic Waste
| author name = Schlueter J R
| author name = Schlueter J
| author affiliation = Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
| author affiliation = Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
| addressee name = Vietti-Cook A L
| addressee name = Vietti-Cook A
| addressee affiliation = NRC/SECY
| addressee affiliation = NRC/SECY
| docket = PROJ0689
| docket = PROJ0689
| license number =  
|| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| case reference number = 83FR06475, NRC-2017-0081, PR-61
| case reference number = 83FR06475, NRC-2017-0081, PR-61
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: SCHLUETER, Janet To: Vietti-Cook, Annette Cc: Dapas, Marc
{{#Wiki_filter:83FR06475                                                                    8 PR-61 From:             SCHLUETER, Janet To:               Vietti-Cook, Annette Cc:               Dapas, Marc; Tappert, John; timothy.mmcartin@nrc.gov; Maupin, Cardelia
; Tappert, John
; timothy.mmcartin@nrc.gov
; Maupin, Cardelia


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Industry Comments on Greater than Class C and Transuranic Waste Disposal (83 FR 6475; Docket ID NRC-2017-0081)
[External_Sender] Industry Comments on Greater than Class C and Transuranic Waste Disposal (83 FR 6475; Docket ID NRC-2017-0081)
Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 5:02:11 PM Attachments:
Date:             Monday, April 16, 2018 5:02:11 PM Attachments:     04-16-18_NRC_NEI Comments on GTCC and TRU Scoping.pdf THE ATTACHMENT CONTAINS THE COMPLETE CONTENTS OF THE LETTER April 16, 2018 Ms. Annette Vietti-Cook Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudication Staff
04-16-18_NRC_NEI Comments on GTCC and TRU Scoping.pdf THE ATTACHMENT CONTAINS THE COMPLETE CONTENTS OF THE LETTER April 16, 2018 Ms. Annette Vietti-Cook Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
 
Washington, DC 20555-0001
 
ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudication Staff


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 36: Line 28:
==Dear Ms. Vietti-Cook:==
==Dear Ms. Vietti-Cook:==


I write to provide input from members of the Nuclear Energy Institute's (NEI)
[1]
[1]Low-Level Radioactive Waste Task Force on the subject Federal Register notice regarding the disposal of
I write to provide input from members of the Nuclear Energy Institutes (NEI)                         Low-Level Radioactive Waste Task Force on the subject Federal Register notice regarding the disposal of Greater than Class C (GTCC) and Transuranic Wastes (TRU). Specifically, staff efforts to develop a technical basis for the permanent disposal of GTCC and TRU through means other than a deep geologic repository. We appreciate the NRC public meetings held on this topic and the opportunity to provide general comments for the staffs consideration. We look forward to future public workshops and a potential rulemaking. Industry supports NRC efforts to help establish a comprehensive national framework for the permanent disposal of all categories of radioactive waste.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (202) 739-8098 or jrs@nei.org.
Sincerely, Janet R. Schlueter Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety Nuclear Energy Institute 1201 F Street N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004


Greater than Class C (GTCC) and Transuranic Wastes (TRU). Specifically, staff efforts to develop a
[1]
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is the organization responsible for establishing unified industry policy on matters affecting the nuclear energy industry, including the regulatory aspects of generic operational and technical issues. NEI's members include entities licensed to operate commercial nuclear power plants in the United States, nuclear plant designers, major architect/engineering firms, fuel cycle facilities, nuclear materials licensees, and other organizations and entities involved in the nuclear energy industry.
This electronic message transmission contains information from the Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc. The information is intended solely for the use of the addressee and its use by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this communication in error, and any review, use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or by electronic mail and permanently delete the original message. IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
Sent through www.intermedia.com


technical basis for the permanent disposal of GTCC and TRU through means other than a deep
JANET R. SCHLUETER Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety 1201 F Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004 P: 202.739.8098 jrs@nei.org nei.org April 16, 2018 Ms. Annette Vietti-Cook Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudication Staff


geologic repository. We appreciate the NRC public meetings held on this topic and the opportunity
==Subject:==
Industry Comments on Greater than Class C and Transuranic Waste Disposal (83 FR 6475; Docket ID NRC-2017-0081)
Project Number: 689


to provide general comments for the staff's consideration. We look forward to future public
==Dear Ms. Vietti-Cook:==


workshops and a potential rulemaking. Industry supports NRC efforts to help establish a
I write to provide input from members of the Nuclear Energy Institutes (NEI) 1 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Task Force on the subject Federal Register notice regarding the disposal of Greater than Class C (GTCC) and Transuranic Wastes (TRU). Specifically, staff efforts to develop a technical basis for the permanent disposal of GTCC and TRU through means other than a deep geologic repository. We appreciate the NRC public meetings held on this topic and the opportunity to provide general comments for the staffs consideration.
We look forward to future public workshops and a potential rulemaking. Industry supports NRC efforts to help establish a comprehensive national framework for the permanent disposal of all categories of radioactive waste.
General Comments:
As I stated during the August 2015 Commission briefing on GTCC waste management, most if not all licensees work hard to not generate GTCC and--once generated--safely and securely manage it.
Additionally, NRCs 2015 Branch Technical Position (BTP) on Concentration Averaging and Source Encapsulation provides a technically sound method to reduce the volume of GTCC and industry is implementing the BTP. Based on long-standing, safe industry practices for radioactive waste management and regulatory oversight, we are not aware of any public health and safety or environmental issue that 1
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is the organization responsible for establishing unified industry policy on matters affecting the nuclear energy industry, including the regulatory aspects of generic operational and technical issues. NEI's members include entities licensed to operate commercial nuclear power plants in the United States, nuclear plant designers, major architect/engineering firms, fuel cycle facilities, nuclear materials licensees, and other organizations and entities involved in the nuclear energy industry.


comprehensive national framework for the permanent disposal of all categories of radioactive
Ms. Vietti-Cook April 16, 2018 Page 2 warrants an immediate or near term regulatory action. That being said, we do believebased in part on the jurisdictional question raised to NRC in 2015 by the Agreement State of Texasthat the time is right, if not long overdue, for the federal government to implement a predictable, comprehensive regulatory framework for the permanent disposal of all categories of wastes including GTCC and TRU. Such efforts should be informed by our nations vast experience in safely managing such wastes and fully resolve all associated jurisdictional, legal, policy and technical issues. In that regard, we support Commission direction on SECY-15-0094 that the staff prepare a regulatory basis for GTCC disposal through means other than a deep geologic repository and add a definition of TRU to 10 CFR Part 61 for clarity and completeness. Both issues will benefit from a fully-vetted, transparent NRC decision making process. For completeness, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the Disposal of GTCC in January 2016. The EIS acknowledges that land disposal of GTCC at a commercial radioactive waste disposal facility is a viable alternative to disposal in a federal facility. The collective efforts of NRC and DOE, along with the Agreement States, will help ensure a more comprehensive radioactive waste management infrastructure for all categories of radioactive waste.
 
As you are aware, Waste Control Specialists (WCS) of Andrews County Texas is currently authorized by the State of Texas to dispose of federally-generated wastes in its federal waste cell on the WCS TX site. We understand that the characteristics of DOEs GTCC-like wastes are very similar to that of commercially-generated GTCC waste. Therefore, from a risk and technical perspective, the disposal of commercially-generated GTCC and TRU wastes at a commercial low-level waste disposal facility might be technically feasible. Additionally, as recognized by domestic low-level waste (LLW) disposal site operators and regulators, disposal of any waste stream with previously unanalyzed characteristics must be based on and bound by a site-specific performance assessment and regulatory authorization. As such, not only is it important that NRC address the Texas jurisdictional inquiry, it is equally important that NRC promulgate through the rulemaking process a set of GTCC/TRU general disposal criteria that may be adopted by an Agreement State and implemented by any LLW disposal site operator. As is the case today, NRC would provide oversight of the Agreement State-authorized LLW disposal program through its Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program. Therefore, regulatory oversight of such wastes would not be diminished under this scenario, in fact, it might be enhanced.
waste.If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (202) 739-8098
We trust that the NRC staff is reaching out to solicit specific input from radioactive waste researchers, technical experts, disposal site operators, the Agreement States, DOE and its laboratories, and others to gather detailed information to help inform development of the draft and final regulatory basis for GTCC and TRU disposal. That being said, ultimately, it is a site-by-site and individual Agreement State decision on whether to authorize the disposal of GTCC/TRU wastes in a commercial LLW disposal facility assuming that all jurisdictional, legal and policy issues are resolved. We look forward to further iterations of the regulatory basis, a potential proposed rule on this matter and a Commission decision on the Texas jurisdictional question.
 
In summary, industry takes great pride in its efforts to safely and securely manage radioactive wastes generated from licensed activities, and the nation and industry at large will benefit from a more
or jrs@nei.org.
S incerely, Janet R. Schlueter
 
Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety Nuclear Energy Institute
 
1201 F Street N.W., Suite 1100
 
Washington, DC 20004
[1] The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is the organization responsible for establishing unified industry policy on matters affecting the nuclear energy industry, including the regulatory aspects of generic operational and technical issues. NEI's members include entities licensed to operate commercial nuclear power plants in the United States, nuclear plant designers, major architect/engineering firms, fuel cycle facilities, nuclear materials licensees, and other organizations and entities involved in the nuclear energy industry.
This electronic message transmission contains information from the Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc. The information is intended solely for the use of the addressee and its use by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this communication in error, and any review, use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or by electronic mail and permanently delete the original message. IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.Sent through www.intermedia.com JANET R. SCHLUETER Senio r Director, Radiation and Materials Safety 1201 F Street
, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004 P: 202.739.80 98 jrs@nei.org nei.org April 16, 2018  Ms. Annette Vietti
-Cook Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
-0001  ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudication Staff
 
==Subject:==
Industry Comments on Greater than Class C and Transuranic Waste Disposal (83 FR 6475; Docke t ID NRC-2017-0081)  Project Number: 689 Dear Ms. Vietti
-Cook:  I write to provide input from members of the Nuclear Energy Institute
's (NEI)1 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Task Force on the subject Federal Register notice regarding the disposal of Greater than Class C (GTCC) and Transuranic Wastes (TRU). Specifically, staff efforts to develop a technical basis for the permanent disposal of GTCC and TRU through means other than a deep geologic repository. We appreciate the NRC public meetings held on this topic and the opportunity to provide general comments for the staff's consideration. We look forward to future public workshops and a potential rulemaking. Industry supports NRC efforts to help establish a comprehensive national framework for the permanent disposal of all categories of radioactive waste.
General Comments
As I stated during the August 2015 Commission briefing on GTCC waste management, most if not all licensees work hard to not generate GTCC and
--once generated
--safely and securely manage it. Additionally, NRC's 2015 Branch Technical Position (BTP) on Concentration Averaging and Source Encapsulation provides a technically sound method to reduce the volume of GTCC and industry is implementing the BTP. Based on long-standing , safe industry practices for radioactive waste management and regulatory oversight, we are not awar e of any public health and safety or environmental issue that                                            1 The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is the organization responsible for establishing unified industry policy on matters affecting the nuclear energy industry, including the regulatory aspects of generic operational and technical issues. NEI's members include entities licensed to operate commercial nuclear power plants in the United States, nuclear plant designers, major architect/engineering firms, fuel cycle facilities, nuclear materials licensees, and other organizations and entities involved in the nuclear energy industry.


Ms. Vietti
Ms. Vietti-Cook April 16, 2018 Page 3 comprehensive national radioactive waste management infrastructure that addresses all categories of wastes.
-Cook April 16 , 2018 Page 2  warrants an immediate or near term regulatory action. That being said, we do believe
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (202) 739-8098 or jrs@nei.org.
-based in part on the jurisdictional question raised to NRC in 2015 by the Agreement State of Texas
Sincerely, Janet R. Schlueter c:     Mr. Marc Dapas, NMSS Mr. John Tappert, NMSS/DUWP Mr. Timothy McCartin, NMSS/DSFM Ms. Cardelia Maupin, NMSS/DUWP/LLW}}
-that the time is right, if not long overdue, for the federal government to implement a predictable, comprehensive regulatory framework for the permanent disposal of all categories of waste s including GTCC and TRU. Such efforts should be informed by our nation's vast experience in safely managing such wastes and fully resolve all associated jurisdictional, legal, policy and technical issues. In that regard, we support Commission direction on SECY-15-0094 that the staff prepare a regulatory basis for GTCC disposal through means other than a deep geologic repository and add a definition of TRU to 10 CFR Part 61 for clarity and completeness. Both issues will benefit from a fully
-vetted, transparent NRC decision making process. For completeness, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the Disposal of GTCC in January 2016. The EIS acknowledges that land disposal of GTCC at a commercial radioactive waste disposal facility is a viable alternative to disposal in a federal facility. The collective efforts of NRC and DOE, along with the Agreement States, will help ensure a more comprehensive radioactive waste management infrastructure for all categories of radioactive waste.
As you are aware, Waste Control Specialists (WCS) of Andrews County Texas is currently authorized by the State of Texas to dispose of federally-generated wastes in its federal waste cell on the WCS TX site. We understand that the characteristics of DOE's "GTCC
-like" wastes are very similar to that of commercially
-generated GTCC waste. Therefore, from a risk and technical perspective, the disposal of commercially
-generated GTCC and TRU wastes at a commercial low-level waste disposal facility might be technically feasible. Additionally, as recognized by domestic low-level waste (LLW) disposal site operators and regulators, disposal of any waste stream with previously unanalyzed characteristics must be based on and bound by a site
-specific performance assessment and regulatory authorization. As such, not only is it important that NRC address the Texas jurisdictional inquiry, it is equally important that NRC promulgate through the rulemaking process a set of GTCC/TRU general disposal criteria that may be adopted by an Agreement State and implemented by a ny LLW disposal site operator. As is the case today, NRC would provide oversight of the Agreement State
-authorized LLW disposal program through its Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program. Therefore, regulatory oversight of such wastes would not be diminished under this scenario, in fact, it might be enhanced.
We trust that the NRC staff is reaching out to solicit specific input from radioactive waste researchers, technical experts, disposal site operators, the Agreement States, DOE and its laboratories, and others to gather detailed information to help inform development of the draft and final regulatory basis for GTCC and TRU disposal. That being said, ultimately, it is a site
-b y-site and individual Agreement State decision on whether to authorize the disposal of GTCC/TRU wastes in a commercial LLW disposal facility assuming that all jurisdictional, legal and policy issues are resolved. We look forward to further iterations of the regulatory basis, a potential proposed rule on this matter and a Commission decision on the Texas jurisdictional question. In summary, industry takes great pride in its efforts to safely and securely manage radioactive waste s generated from licensed activities , and the nation and industry at large will benefit from a more Ms. Vietti
-Cook April 16 , 2018 Page 3 comprehensive national radioactive waste management infrastructure that addresses all categories of waste s. If you have any questions or require additional information, plea se contact me at (202) 739
-8098 or jrs@nei.org.
Sincerely,     Janet R. Schlueter c: Mr. Marc Dapas, NMSS Mr. John Tappert, NMSS/DUWP Mr. Timothy McCartin, NMSS/DSFM Ms. Cardelia Maupin, NMSS/DUWP/LLW}}

Latest revision as of 08:46, 21 October 2019

Comment (008) of Janet Schlueter on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on PR-61 - Disposal of Greater-than-Class C and Transuranic Waste
ML18107A042
Person / Time
Site: Nuclear Energy Institute
Issue date: 04/16/2018
From: Schlueter J
Nuclear Energy Institute
To: Annette Vietti-Cook
NRC/SECY
References
83FR06475, NRC-2017-0081, PR-61
Download: ML18107A042 (5)


Text

83FR06475 8 PR-61 From: SCHLUETER, Janet To: Vietti-Cook, Annette Cc: Dapas, Marc; Tappert, John; timothy.mmcartin@nrc.gov; Maupin, Cardelia

Subject:

[External_Sender] Industry Comments on Greater than Class C and Transuranic Waste Disposal (83 FR 6475; Docket ID NRC-2017-0081)

Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 5:02:11 PM Attachments: 04-16-18_NRC_NEI Comments on GTCC and TRU Scoping.pdf THE ATTACHMENT CONTAINS THE COMPLETE CONTENTS OF THE LETTER April 16, 2018 Ms. Annette Vietti-Cook Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudication Staff

Subject:

Industry Comments on Greater than Class C and Transuranic Waste Disposal (83 FR 6475; Docket ID NRC-2017-0081)

Project Number: 689

Dear Ms. Vietti-Cook:

[1]

I write to provide input from members of the Nuclear Energy Institutes (NEI) Low-Level Radioactive Waste Task Force on the subject Federal Register notice regarding the disposal of Greater than Class C (GTCC) and Transuranic Wastes (TRU). Specifically, staff efforts to develop a technical basis for the permanent disposal of GTCC and TRU through means other than a deep geologic repository. We appreciate the NRC public meetings held on this topic and the opportunity to provide general comments for the staffs consideration. We look forward to future public workshops and a potential rulemaking. Industry supports NRC efforts to help establish a comprehensive national framework for the permanent disposal of all categories of radioactive waste.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (202) 739-8098 or jrs@nei.org.

Sincerely, Janet R. Schlueter Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety Nuclear Energy Institute 1201 F Street N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004

[1]

The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is the organization responsible for establishing unified industry policy on matters affecting the nuclear energy industry, including the regulatory aspects of generic operational and technical issues. NEI's members include entities licensed to operate commercial nuclear power plants in the United States, nuclear plant designers, major architect/engineering firms, fuel cycle facilities, nuclear materials licensees, and other organizations and entities involved in the nuclear energy industry.

This electronic message transmission contains information from the Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc. The information is intended solely for the use of the addressee and its use by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this communication in error, and any review, use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or by electronic mail and permanently delete the original message. IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

Sent through www.intermedia.com

JANET R. SCHLUETER Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety 1201 F Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004 P: 202.739.8098 jrs@nei.org nei.org April 16, 2018 Ms. Annette Vietti-Cook Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudication Staff

Subject:

Industry Comments on Greater than Class C and Transuranic Waste Disposal (83 FR 6475; Docket ID NRC-2017-0081)

Project Number: 689

Dear Ms. Vietti-Cook:

I write to provide input from members of the Nuclear Energy Institutes (NEI) 1 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Task Force on the subject Federal Register notice regarding the disposal of Greater than Class C (GTCC) and Transuranic Wastes (TRU). Specifically, staff efforts to develop a technical basis for the permanent disposal of GTCC and TRU through means other than a deep geologic repository. We appreciate the NRC public meetings held on this topic and the opportunity to provide general comments for the staffs consideration.

We look forward to future public workshops and a potential rulemaking. Industry supports NRC efforts to help establish a comprehensive national framework for the permanent disposal of all categories of radioactive waste.

General Comments:

As I stated during the August 2015 Commission briefing on GTCC waste management, most if not all licensees work hard to not generate GTCC and--once generated--safely and securely manage it.

Additionally, NRCs 2015 Branch Technical Position (BTP) on Concentration Averaging and Source Encapsulation provides a technically sound method to reduce the volume of GTCC and industry is implementing the BTP. Based on long-standing, safe industry practices for radioactive waste management and regulatory oversight, we are not aware of any public health and safety or environmental issue that 1

The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is the organization responsible for establishing unified industry policy on matters affecting the nuclear energy industry, including the regulatory aspects of generic operational and technical issues. NEI's members include entities licensed to operate commercial nuclear power plants in the United States, nuclear plant designers, major architect/engineering firms, fuel cycle facilities, nuclear materials licensees, and other organizations and entities involved in the nuclear energy industry.

Ms. Vietti-Cook April 16, 2018 Page 2 warrants an immediate or near term regulatory action. That being said, we do believebased in part on the jurisdictional question raised to NRC in 2015 by the Agreement State of Texasthat the time is right, if not long overdue, for the federal government to implement a predictable, comprehensive regulatory framework for the permanent disposal of all categories of wastes including GTCC and TRU. Such efforts should be informed by our nations vast experience in safely managing such wastes and fully resolve all associated jurisdictional, legal, policy and technical issues. In that regard, we support Commission direction on SECY-15-0094 that the staff prepare a regulatory basis for GTCC disposal through means other than a deep geologic repository and add a definition of TRU to 10 CFR Part 61 for clarity and completeness. Both issues will benefit from a fully-vetted, transparent NRC decision making process. For completeness, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the Disposal of GTCC in January 2016. The EIS acknowledges that land disposal of GTCC at a commercial radioactive waste disposal facility is a viable alternative to disposal in a federal facility. The collective efforts of NRC and DOE, along with the Agreement States, will help ensure a more comprehensive radioactive waste management infrastructure for all categories of radioactive waste.

As you are aware, Waste Control Specialists (WCS) of Andrews County Texas is currently authorized by the State of Texas to dispose of federally-generated wastes in its federal waste cell on the WCS TX site. We understand that the characteristics of DOEs GTCC-like wastes are very similar to that of commercially-generated GTCC waste. Therefore, from a risk and technical perspective, the disposal of commercially-generated GTCC and TRU wastes at a commercial low-level waste disposal facility might be technically feasible. Additionally, as recognized by domestic low-level waste (LLW) disposal site operators and regulators, disposal of any waste stream with previously unanalyzed characteristics must be based on and bound by a site-specific performance assessment and regulatory authorization. As such, not only is it important that NRC address the Texas jurisdictional inquiry, it is equally important that NRC promulgate through the rulemaking process a set of GTCC/TRU general disposal criteria that may be adopted by an Agreement State and implemented by any LLW disposal site operator. As is the case today, NRC would provide oversight of the Agreement State-authorized LLW disposal program through its Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program. Therefore, regulatory oversight of such wastes would not be diminished under this scenario, in fact, it might be enhanced.

We trust that the NRC staff is reaching out to solicit specific input from radioactive waste researchers, technical experts, disposal site operators, the Agreement States, DOE and its laboratories, and others to gather detailed information to help inform development of the draft and final regulatory basis for GTCC and TRU disposal. That being said, ultimately, it is a site-by-site and individual Agreement State decision on whether to authorize the disposal of GTCC/TRU wastes in a commercial LLW disposal facility assuming that all jurisdictional, legal and policy issues are resolved. We look forward to further iterations of the regulatory basis, a potential proposed rule on this matter and a Commission decision on the Texas jurisdictional question.

In summary, industry takes great pride in its efforts to safely and securely manage radioactive wastes generated from licensed activities, and the nation and industry at large will benefit from a more

Ms. Vietti-Cook April 16, 2018 Page 3 comprehensive national radioactive waste management infrastructure that addresses all categories of wastes.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (202) 739-8098 or jrs@nei.org.

Sincerely, Janet R. Schlueter c: Mr. Marc Dapas, NMSS Mr. John Tappert, NMSS/DUWP Mr. Timothy McCartin, NMSS/DSFM Ms. Cardelia Maupin, NMSS/DUWP/LLW