ML18283A529: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMXSSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTEIORXTY (Browns Perry Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2)) | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMXSSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of ) | ||
The responses be3ow confirm the oral response given Mr.Garner'by Mr.Powell on July 2: 84(g), (h): The feather on a wand option was not specifically considered at the time of the original decision because it appeared at that time that a satisfactory method of leak checking was available and, thus, there was no need to consider others.98, 276, 277, 280: The responses to these interrogatories were either prepared by Mr.Green personally or under his supervision or direction and with his specific approval. | ) | ||
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTEIORXTY ) Docket Nos. 50- | |||
) 0-260 (Browns Perry Nuclear Plant, )- | |||
Units 1 and 2) ) | |||
LICENSEE'S RESPONSES TO MR. GMQIHR'S ORAL UESTIONS OF JULY 1; 1976 On July 1, 1976, Intervenor William E. Garner, in a telephone conversation with David G. Powell, requested that some of the responses to interrogatories filed by TVA on June 21, 1976, be clarified. The responses be3ow confirm the oral response given Mr. Garner'by Mr. Powell on July 2: | |||
84(g), (h): The feather on a wand option was not specifically considered at the time of the original decision because it appeared at that time that a satisfactory method of leak checking was available and, thus, there was no need to consider others. | |||
98, 276, 277, 280: The responses to these interrogatories were either prepared by Mr. Green personally or under his supervision or direction and with his specific approval. | |||
sp | |||
;) | |||
110: TVA has not decided upon any one soap solution that will be used exclusively for leak checking. Any solution that would be used would first be qualified for this application. | |||
274: At the time this, statement was made, a full investigation of the specific causes and circumstances surrounding the fire had not yet been completed and Mr. Green could not yet have been aware of. them. | |||
Thus, Mr. Green's use of the word "-inexcusable" was not meant to refer to any fault or culpability relating to the specific circumstances of the fire, but merely reflected Mr. Green's initial reaction to the fire. | |||
I certify that the above responses are true and correct.. | |||
David G. Powell Attorney for Licensee Tennessee Valley Authority July 2, 1976 Knoxville, Tennessee | |||
0' UNXTED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COI&iISSXON Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of ) | |||
') | |||
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ) Docket Nos. 50-259 | |||
) 50-260 (Bxowns Ferry Nuclear Plant, ) | |||
Units 1 and 2) ) | |||
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have served the original and 20 conformed copeis, of the following document on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission by depositing them in the United States mail, postage pre-paid and addressed to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mashington, D.C. 20555, Attention: Chief, Docketing and Service Section: | |||
Licensee's Responses to Mr. Garner's Oral Questions of July 1, 1976 and that I have served a copy of the above document upon the persons listed below by depositing it in the United States mail, postage pre-paid and addressed: | |||
Thomas W. Reilly, Esq., Chairman Dr. Frederick P. Cowan Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 22 Browns Lane U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Bellport, New York 11713-Washington, D.C. 20555 William E. Garner, Esq. | |||
Dr. Hugh C. Paxton Route 4, Box 354 Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Scottsboro, Alabama 35768 P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, New 1fexico 87544 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board James R. Tourtellotte, Esq. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lawrence Brenner, Esq. Washington, D.C. '0555 Office of the Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 This 2nd day of July, 1976. | |||
David G. Powell Attorney for,Licensee Tennessee Valley Authority}} |
Latest revision as of 13:04, 20 October 2019
ML18283A529 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Browns Ferry |
Issue date: | 07/02/1976 |
From: | Dawn Powell Tennessee Valley Authority |
To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
References | |
Download: ML18283A529 (7) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMXSSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of )
)
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTEIORXTY ) Docket Nos. 50-
) 0-260 (Browns Perry Nuclear Plant, )-
Units 1 and 2) )
LICENSEE'S RESPONSES TO MR. GMQIHR'S ORAL UESTIONS OF JULY 1; 1976 On July 1, 1976, Intervenor William E. Garner, in a telephone conversation with David G. Powell, requested that some of the responses to interrogatories filed by TVA on June 21, 1976, be clarified. The responses be3ow confirm the oral response given Mr. Garner'by Mr. Powell on July 2:
84(g), (h): The feather on a wand option was not specifically considered at the time of the original decision because it appeared at that time that a satisfactory method of leak checking was available and, thus, there was no need to consider others.
98, 276, 277, 280: The responses to these interrogatories were either prepared by Mr. Green personally or under his supervision or direction and with his specific approval.
sp
- )
110: TVA has not decided upon any one soap solution that will be used exclusively for leak checking. Any solution that would be used would first be qualified for this application.
274: At the time this, statement was made, a full investigation of the specific causes and circumstances surrounding the fire had not yet been completed and Mr. Green could not yet have been aware of. them.
Thus, Mr. Green's use of the word "-inexcusable" was not meant to refer to any fault or culpability relating to the specific circumstances of the fire, but merely reflected Mr. Green's initial reaction to the fire.
I certify that the above responses are true and correct..
David G. Powell Attorney for Licensee Tennessee Valley Authority July 2, 1976 Knoxville, Tennessee
0' UNXTED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COI&iISSXON Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of )
')
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ) Docket Nos. 50-259
) 50-260 (Bxowns Ferry Nuclear Plant, )
Units 1 and 2) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have served the original and 20 conformed copeis, of the following document on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission by depositing them in the United States mail, postage pre-paid and addressed to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mashington, D.C. 20555, Attention: Chief, Docketing and Service Section:
Licensee's Responses to Mr. Garner's Oral Questions of July 1, 1976 and that I have served a copy of the above document upon the persons listed below by depositing it in the United States mail, postage pre-paid and addressed:
Thomas W. Reilly, Esq., Chairman Dr. Frederick P. Cowan Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 22 Browns Lane U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Bellport, New York 11713-Washington, D.C. 20555 William E. Garner, Esq.
Dr. Hugh C. Paxton Route 4, Box 354 Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Scottsboro, Alabama 35768 P.O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, New 1fexico 87544 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board James R. Tourtellotte, Esq. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lawrence Brenner, Esq. Washington, D.C. '0555 Office of the Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 This 2nd day of July, 1976.
David G. Powell Attorney for,Licensee Tennessee Valley Authority