ML18283A536
| ML18283A536 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry |
| Issue date: | 06/20/1976 |
| From: | Garner W - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| Download: ML18283A536 (10) | |
Text
WUC i. ".'ij.t lt'"0Uls.i l'( l(Y,'OL'1i1IS~ ION Before the 'itomic Safety and licensing Board In the Natter of
)
TENNESSEE VAIXEY AU""liOfil i", Y
)
Browns Perry Nucle;.r Plant (Units 1 and 2)
Dockei; Nos.
0-2/9
-F6 INTEi<VHiVOit' f7ES i'ON.';- ~~'O f30'; <<0' RULINGS ON N(.Tl(.NS 3:i'J.'L'9 JUNE 10, 1976 Mithout waiving his ripht to object to their admissibility into evidence, Intervenor makes-the following further answers to the interrogatories of the Ap;lic,nt.
eq s
p I
j,(
~1 4
% J
1 (a).
As'n A o!'tipulaLc d Cont.ellt.l()tl 1:
l)'lr'!1!',I"rl)lr l oil pAj.;1'l nl lllr'livn!rl1]".!rl loll report
! y the Nucle::r inert",y 'ni!rt ilit.y niiii 1'rni)< i ly Irr rrir'rrr:rcr A~:.mr:i:it inrr May, it!'!'.
As, to 8 of Striated Contention 1 i paragra>ihs lq and 5 on page 3
of, the Invest-igation report by the Nuclear energy Liability and Property Insurance Association, May>
19 As to C of Stipulated Contention 1:
Intervenor does not, intend to further nursue this subsection.
As to 0 of Stip>>later! ContenLion 1:
the last Lwo paragraphs on page 9 and. the first't,hree paragraphs on page 10 of the Investigation Eteport by the Nuclear &ergy Liabi.lit,y and Property Insurance Association,
- Hay, 1975.
As to E of Stipulated Contention 1:
t,he !'irst fi.ve'arapraphs on page 12 of the Invbstigation Report by the Nuclear Enerp~ LiabiliLy and Property Insurance As rociatinn,
%y, 1975. '
As t,o F of StiprrlaLed ConLention 1:
paragraph 6,
7 and 8 on page 3 and the second para!,riilh on page
!+ nf the Invest,ir 'it,ion tl<port, by the Nuc'lear Lgncrgg Liability and v
Proper L'ri.urance Associat,i,on,
- Hay, 1975.
2 (d).
See 1 (a) above.
Also,:
As to A of 1:
the recommenJati.on of NilC and the proposals of the TVA are inadk-quate Lo obviate the necessity for indepenrient CSHs.
This is especially true of the adminisLrative charges.
See for extr..rple let,ter and aLtachment dated
~une 7, 1976 from
!". J.
Long Lo Tennessee Valley Authority, and letLcr and attachment dated June 11, 1976 from i". J.
Long to Tennessee Valley AutBority.
As t,o 9 of 2:
see "as to A of 1" above.
As t,o 0 of 1:
NRC aporoval of TVA proposals is untenable.
Necessity for evacuation of the Control room should be avoided.
As Lo l. of 1:
'i'ho NlR responsf s and TVA proposals do not solve the problems of Lhe possible loss o!'ne or morc rrnit,s redundant sysLem$
See "as to E of Stipulat'ed Contention 1" in response to 1(a) above.
1
s ~ ~
> ~
A".
t,o
!" of 1: the
'I'VA !ir<it>o!isis an(t 't,)i( ~ NIIC 'i('('(,pt'ill(ie ol
>>!lill(~ r(i>p>"Ir'(> l>t friar)('quatre (s'.
N IL> c(~ll(."l( iir>> I>ll ) nt (
~
(it Al I ri('lllll('lit. I "I o a'>I'ili.).
is iioi, an acceptable x).'ernat,e.,
I'1'irui'it I v "!~('r'(I ('.I >>y:(I (i((
2 (e).
second part:
paragraph 3 of page 3 of the i1EI,PIA inves'igation report of Nay 1975, especially the last sentence thereof.
3 (f)'.,"econd part.:
paragra',hs 4 ani 5 of page 3, of the NELI'IA in~est,igat.ioi( report, of. May 1(175.
4 (d). secorid part: inter ve:ior docs riot, inl,u:i:I 'o f(irther pursue
. oct,'n 0 of St,i pulat.ed Con'>>t, ion I.
5 (h). (I) Unless the other saf( t'y p.ecairtions adeouately replace the need for the modificat,ion, yes.
(2) (Piere 'he pi!biicrs safety is ccncnrnoi, cost.
shou'r(t be immateria1.
As to reasons and bases, sr e as to 0 of ),in response t,o 1 (a) above, and as 't:o I) of 1
in response t,(
2 ((i) above.
6 (().:(i~(.or)(I pa:i.: (1) sen 5 ())) (1) above.
i l
(2) sen 5 (h) (2) above.-
See a".
t,o K n)'
in respon.
e t,o I {a) arid 2 ((') above.
8 (a) and (b)
In'ervenor defines "techni.ca11y qualified and competent" as having the i
education, training, experience, ability and willingness 'tn do something.
The definition includes supervisory and management personnel having the same'characteristics pli.s their T
Ai".linr,ness t,o correct
. rrnrs.
8 (c), (d) and (e).
TVi's "technical.ly incompetent and unqulified "to complete any of the modifications: the area of t.ec)inical'xpertise that is required to the greatest degree is a supervisory and management disciplinary program that, works; to prove competency
'fVA woulri have to come forward with a real.ist,ic program that works or delegate to others such a program.
I 10 (a). (iefined as deviat.io:is frnm the design approved by the f..r'.
11 (d).
see HRC staff res>pons(.
to Tnterverinr(s Int,erro)',at,os 13 at page 12 of NF(C Staff's Answers t,o Int,crrogitories of Tntervenor Garner.
11 (e).
tt>e program is'ol comprelu nsiv>> and coml>let,c enout',h.
Gee l'or vx>u>>l>l~
I IE lns>>ection teleport Nns..'0-25o /7t -1" and
'.>0-2(>0/7t'.-12 d.'cl.e.l 6/3/7(,
<;nl>r cinl ty I on page 2 and h. on pages I-5; especially I at page 2.
and XE Report No. 50-259/76-11 and 50-260/7(:-11, 11-'(f). Intervenor has no knowledge as t6 @ther, regions.
11 (g). Given the TVA track record, attitu~ie, lack of competence, failure to comply>
and incorripibi1ity, NRC's inspection and surveil]ance should be total and cons~ant.
(III(,'il.'. ll".".liUij. I!(>'iY 0( Nf'~>1.;SXi N Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Tn the Matter of TENNESSEE, VALLEY AUTIIORXTY (frowns Perry Nuclear Plant nits 1 and 2)
Docket Nos.
50-259 50-260 State of Alabama
)
)
County'of Jackson
)
'/1illiam E. Garner, being fir'st duly sworn, deposes and says I
that he has read the.foregoing Intervenor's
Response
to Hoard's Bulin!~s on Notions Bated June 10, 1976, that he is informed, of the matters stated in the answers thereto and th;:t the answers are true I,o the.best of his knowledpe, information, and belief.
</illiam I". Garner Subscribed.
and sworn to before mc this 20th day of June, 1976>.
pI
')
ota y l c, ac son
'ounty, Alabama My Commission expir<"s Y
ggV 2
~ot g,V Oh
<1<1
$0
J
~
~
i i 'I'i,'D iilJC Ii:
1n the Mat ter of
)
)
Tennessee V alley Authori ty
)
)
Browns Ferry Nuclear P]ant
)
(Units 1 and 2)
)
ST~a'I'll:l (il'Nt"l(XCA 9
I< il:IU tel L'(>l<Y 0(:MMXSSION Docket Nos.
50-259 50-260
~~ ~ g76 5*/fQ'to<<
C<r"e ~'
', -~~4+
/P ggglloA CEI<TIPIC>'TY OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have s"rved copies of the following on the following by depositing them in the United States mail, first class, postage.
prepaid:
Intervenor's E(espon.:e to Board's Etulin<I. Reilly, !'-s:t., Chairman Atomic Safety and Eiicensinp Board U. S. Nuclear Re,u3atory C(,mmi.".sion l'1 ~st>inpton, D. C.
20555 Dr. Frederick I'. Cowan 22
!3rowns L: ne
!3ellport, New Yorl< 11713 Dr. Ilugh C. l'axton los Alamos Scient,ific Labor; t;ory
!.'. (..
Box 1663 1 os Alamos, New Ilexico 8754'1 (general Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority 629 New Sprankle Building Knoxville, Tennessee 37919 Executive Legal Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
'~'ia"hington, D. C,, '20555 A tomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
"(ashingt on.,
D.
C.
20555
!Lhi.; 20th day o,f'un.,
1')76.
- Iillj.o.m l'.
( amer Inte rv<.'nor pro-gy,
I 0
~