ML061230054: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 05/01/2006
| issue date = 05/01/2006
| title = EA-06-047, Duane Arnold, Notice of Violation
| title = EA-06-047, Duane Arnold, Notice of Violation
| author name = Caldwell J L
| author name = Caldwell J
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/ORA
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/ORA
| addressee name = VanMiddlesworth G D
| addressee name = Vanmiddlesworth G
| addressee affiliation = Nuclear Management Co, LLC
| addressee affiliation = Nuclear Management Co, LLC
| docket = 05000331
| docket = 05000331

Revision as of 20:08, 13 July 2019

EA-06-047, Duane Arnold, Notice of Violation
ML061230054
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/01/2006
From: Caldwell J
Region 3 Administrator
To: Vanmiddlesworth G
Nuclear Management Co
References
3-2004-033, EA-06-047, IA-06-013, IA-06-014, IA-06-015
Download: ML061230054 (6)


Text

May 1, 2006EA-06-047Mr. Gary Van MiddlesworthVice-PresidentDuane Arnold Energy Center 3277 DAEC Road Palo, IA 52324-9785

SUBJECT:

NOTICE OF VIOLATION (OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS REPORT NO. 3-2004-033) DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER

Dear Mr. Van Middlesworth:

This refers to the investigation conducted by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)Office of Investigations (OI) at the Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) that was completed onOctober 26, 2005. The investigation concerned a former supervisor's apparent willful violationof a DAEC refueling procedure on November 9, 2004. In that instance, the former supervisor failed to complete a "Pre Fuel Move Checklist," as required by a DAEC fuel handling procedure before moving three irradiated fuel bundles in the DAEC spent fuel pool. A summary of the OI report was provided to you on March 9, 2006.In the letter transmitting the summary of the OI report, we provided you the opportunity toaddress the apparent violation described in that letter by either attending a predecisionalenforcement conference (PEC), providing a written response, or requesting alternative dispute resolution (ADR) before we made our final enforcement decision. On March 15, 2006, you indicated that a PEC would not be necessary, you would not be requesting ADR, and a written response would be submitted. In a letter dated April 7, 2006, you provided a written response to the apparent violation.Based on the information developed during the investigation and the information that youprovided in your April 7, 2006, letter, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRCrequirements occurred. The violation is cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice) andthe circumstances surrounding it described in the summary of OI Report No. 3-2004-033 provided to you on March 9, 2006. In summary, DAEC Refueling Procedure No. 403, "Performance of Fuel Handling Activities," Revision No. 16, was issued on June 16, 2004, and required that the designated fuel handling supervisor complete applicable sections of the "Pre Fuel Move Checklist" before starting fuel handling activities. On November 9, 2004, a refueling floor supervisor, who was primarily responsible for preparing Revision No. 16 to the procedure, was the designated fuel handling supervisor and he failed to complete the "Pre Fuel Move Checklist" before moving three irradiated fuel bundles in the DAEC spent fuel pool, as required by the refueling procedure. Based on the information developed during the OI investigation, it appears that the refueling floor supervisor had sufficient understanding of theprocedural requirement to complete applicable sections of the "Pre Fuel Move Checklist" before starting fuel handling activities on November 9, 2004. Also, the refueling floor supervisor was experienced in refueling floor activities and was appropriately trained for the movement of G. Van Middlesworth-2-irradiated fuel in the spent fuel pool. Therefore, this is considered to be a willful violation,demonstrating at least careless disregard of a procedure required by DAEC Technical Specification 5.4.1, and the violation has been categorized in accordance with theNRC Enforcement Policy at Severity Level III. The current Enforcement Policy isincluded on the NRC's Web site at www.nrc.gov; select What We Do , Enforcement

, then Enforcement Policy. In accordance with the Enforcement Policy, a base civil penalty in the amount of $60,000 wasconsidered for a Severity Level III violation occurring on November 9, 2004. Since this is awillful violation, the NRC considered whether credit was warranted for Identification andCorrective Action in accordance with the civil penalty assessment process in Section VI.C.2 ofthe Enforcement Policy. Credit was warranted for the Identification factor since your staffidentified the violation and notified the NRC. Credit was also given for the Corrective Actionfactor. Corrective actions consisted of: (1) suspending fuel movement on the refuel floor; (2) taking disciplinary action; (3) creating a dedicated fuel movement team; (4) re-training operators involved in fuel movement; and (5) assigning a manager to sponsor new fuel receipt.Therefore, to encourage prompt identification and comprehensive correction of violations, Ihave been authorized, after consultation with the Director, Office of Enforcement, not to propose a civil penalty in this case. However, significant violations in the future could result in a civil penalty. The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the violation, the correctiveactions taken and planned to correct the violation and prevent recurrence and the date when full compliance was achieved is already adequately addressed on the docket in your April 7, 2006, letter. Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you choose to provide additional information, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice. Please contact Bruce L. Burgess, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 2 at (630) 829-9629 with anyquestions.If you disagree with the enforcement sanction, you may request ADR with the NRC in anattempt to resolve the issues. Alternative dispute resolution is a general term encompassing various techniques for resolving conflict outside of court using a neutral third party. The technique that the NRC has decided to employ during a pilot program which is now in effectis mediation. Additional information concerning the NRC's pilot program is described inthe enclosed brochure (NUREG/BR-0317) and can be obtained at http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement/adr.html. The Institute on Conflict Resolution (ICR) atCornell University has agreed to facilitate the NRC's program as an intake neutral. Pleasecontact ICR at 877-733-9415 within 10 days of the date of this letter if you are interested in pursing resolution of this issue through ADR.In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, itsenclosure, and your response, if you choose to respond, will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system G. Van Middlesworth-3-(ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the Public without redaction. TheNRC also includes significant enforcement actions on its Web site at www.nrc.gov; select WhatWe Do , Enforcement , then Significant Enforcement Actions

.Sincerely, /RA by Geoffrey Grant acting for/James L. CaldwellRegional Administrator Docket No. 50-331License No. DPR-49

Enclosures:

1. Notice of Violation 2. NUREG/BR-0317 (LICENSEE ONLY)cc w/encls:J. Stall, Senior Vice President, Nuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer R. Helfrich, Senior Attorney M. Ross, Managing Attorney W. Webster, Vice President, Nuclear Operations M. Warner, Vice President, Nuclear Operations Support R. Kundalkar, Vice President, Nuclear Engineering J. Bjorseth, Site Director D. Curtland, Plant Manager S. Catron, Manager, Regulatory Affairs Chairman, Linn County Board of Supervisors D. McGhee, Iowa Department of Public HealthFILE NAME: G:\EICS\Duane Arnold\06-047 EA SLIII No CP - FINAL.wpd Publicly Available G Non-Publicly Available G Sensitive Non-SensitiveTo receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:

" C" = Copy w/o att/encl " E" = Copy w/att/encl " N" = No copyOFFICERIIIENRR*EOGCED:OE*ERIIIERIIIENAMEWeilPascarelliB. JonesJohnsonBoland forPedersonWest for SatoriusDATE04/26/0604/26/0604/20/0604/26/064/28/064/28/06OFFICERIIINRIIINNAMEO'BrienGrant for CaldwellDATE5/1/065/1/06OFFICIAL RECORD COPY* HQ concurrences provided in 4-26-2006 e-mail from D. Starkey, OE.

G. Van Middlesworth-4-

SUBJECT:

NOTICE OF VIOLATION (OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS REPORT NO. 3-2004-033) DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTERDISTRIBUTION

ADAMS (PARS)

SECY OCA L. Reyes, EDO W. Kane, DEDR M. Johnson, OE C. Nolan, OE D. Starkey, OE N. Hilton, OE J. Caldwell, RIII G. Grant, RIII M. Satorius, RIII C. Pederson, RIII A. Boland, RIII S. West, RIII L. Chandler, OGC B. Jones, OGC J. Bonanno, OGC J. Dyer, NRR D. Holody, Enforcement Officer, RI C. Evans, Enforcement Officer, RII K. O'Brien, Enforcement Officer, RIII K. Fuller, Enforcement Officer, RIV R. Pascarelli, Enforcement Coordinator, NRR Resident Inspector E. Brenner, OPA H. Bell, OIG G. Caputo, OI J. Schlueter, OSTP R. Paul, RIII:OI C. Dvorak, RIII:OI N. Hane, RIII:OIB. Burgess, RIII C. Weil, RIII:EICS J. Strasma, RIII:PA R. Lickus, RIII J. Lynch, RIII OEWEB OEMAIL OAC3 DRPIII DRSIII PLB1 JRK1 NOTICE OF VIOLATIONFPL Energy, LLCDocket No.050-00331Duane Arnold Energy Center License No. DPR-49 EA-06-047

During an NRC investigation completed on October 26, 2005, a violation of NRC requirementswas identified. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below: Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) Technical Specification 5.4.1. provides, in part,that written procedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained covering theapplicable procedures recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, Appendix A, February 1978.Section 2 of Appendix A to Regulatory Guide 1.33, "Quality Assurance ProgramRequirements (Operation)," Revision 2, February 1978, provides, in part, that the licensee establish written procedures for preparation for refueling, refueling equipment operation, and core alterations. Section 5.2 of DAEC Refueling Procedure 403, Revision 16, dated June 16, 2004,"Performance of Fuel Handling Activities," a procedure that implements Technical Specification 5.4.1 and Regulatory Guide 1.33, provides that prior to the start of fuelhandling activities, the Refueling Services Manager or the designated Fuel Handling Supervisor shall complete applicable sections of the "Pre Fuel Move Checklist." Contrary to the above, on November 9, 2004, a designated fuel handling supervisorfailed to complete a Pre Fuel Move Checklist prior to relocating three irradiated fuel bundles in the DAEC Spent Fuel/Cask Pool.This is a Severity Level III violation (Supplement I) (EA-06-047).The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the violation, the correctiveactions taken and planned to correct the violation and prevent recurrence, and the date whenfull compliance was achieved is already adequately addressed on the docket in your April 7, 2006, letter. Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you choose to provide additional information, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice. However, you are required to submit pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 if the description therein does not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you choose to respond, clearly mark your response as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation; EA-06-047" and send it to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator and the Enforcement Officer, Region III, and a copy to theNRC Resident Inspector at the Duane Arnold Energy Center, within 30 days of the lettertransmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). If you contest this enforcement action, you should also provide a copy of your response, withthe basis for your denial, to the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Notice of Violation-2-If you choose to respond, your response will be made available electronically for publicinspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS),

accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html, to the extentpossible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. In accordance with 10 CFR 19.11, you may be required to post this Notice within two workingdays. Dated this 1 st day of May 2006