NOC-AE-15003304, Cycle 20 Core Operating Limits Report: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 11/12/2015 | | issue date = 11/12/2015 | ||
| title = Cycle 20 Core Operating Limits Report | | title = Cycle 20 Core Operating Limits Report | ||
| author name = Dunn R | | author name = Dunn R | ||
| author affiliation = South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Co | | author affiliation = South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Co | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = |
Revision as of 14:43, 20 June 2019
ML15334A346 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | South Texas ![]() |
Issue date: | 11/12/2015 |
From: | Dunn R South Texas |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
NOC-AE-15003304, STI: 34235347 | |
Download: ML15334A346 (18) | |
Text
Nuclear Operating Company South Texas Pro/edt E/ectric Generating SLtaton PCO Box 289 Wadsworth, Texas 77483 :v/v -November 12, 2015 NOC-AE-1 5003304 10 CFR 50.36 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 South Texas Project Unit 1 Docket No. STN 50-498 Unit 1 Cycle 20 Core Operatincq Limits Report In accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.1 .6.d, STP Nuclear Operating Company submits the attached Core Operating Limits Report for Unit 1 Cycle 20. The report covers the core design changes made during the 1RE19 refueling outage.There are no commitments in this letter.If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact Marilyn Kistler at (361)972-8385 or me at (361) 972-7743.Roland F. Dunn Manager, Nuclear Fuel & Analysis mk
Attachment:
South Texas Project Unit 1 Cycle 20 Core Operating Limits Report, Revision 0 STI: 34235347 NOC-AE-1 5003304 Page 2 of 2 CC: (paper copy)Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1600 East Lamar Boulevard Arlington, TX 76011-4511 Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North (08 H04)11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 NRC Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0. Box 289, Mail Code: MNIl16 Wadsworth, TX 77483 (electronic copy)Morgqan. Lewis & Bockius LLP Steve Frantz, Esquire U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa M. Regner NRG South Texas LP John Ragan Chris O'Hara Jim von Suskil CPS Energqy Kevin Polio Cris Eugster L. D. Blaylock Crain Caton & James, P.C.Peter Nemeth City of Austin Cheryl Mele John Wester Texas Dept. of State Health Services Richard A. Ratliff Robert Free Nuclear Operating Company SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT Unit 1 Cycle 20 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT Revision 0 Core Operating Limits Report Pg f1 Page 1 of 16 l~ 1 Cycle 20 Nuclear Operating Company Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0rPage 2 of 16 1.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report for STPEGS Unit 1 Cycle 20 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.6. The core operating limits have been developed using the NRC-approved methodologies specified in Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.The Technical Specifications affected by this report are: 1) 2.1 SAFETY LIMITS 2) 2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 3) 3/4.1.1.1 SHUTDOWN MARGIN 4) 3/4.1.1.3 MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT LIMITS 5) 3/4.1.3.5 SHUTDOWN ROD INSERTION LIMITS 6) 3/4.1.3.6 CONTROL ROD INSERTION LIMITS 7) 3/4.2.1 AFD LIMITS 8) 3/4.2.2 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR 9) 3/4.2.3 NUCLEAR ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR 10) 3/4.2.5 DNB PARAMETERS 2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section 1.0 are presented below.2.1 SAFETY LIMITS (Specification 2.1):*2.1.1 The combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) shall not exceed the limits shown in Figure 1.2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS (Specification 2.2): 2.2.1 2.2.1 The Loop design flow for Reactor Coolant Flow-Low is 98,000 gpm.
B .Unit 1 Cycle 20 Nuclear Operating Company Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 mr r Page 3 of 16 2.2.2 The Over-temperature AT and Over-power AT setpoint parameter values are listed below: Over-temperature AT Setpoint Parameter Valuesmeasured reactor vessel AT lead/lag time constant, Ti 8 sec t2 measured reactor vessel AT lead/lag time constant, T2 --3 secmeasured reactor vessel AT lag time constant, T3 = 2 sec t 4 measured reactor vessel average temperature lead/lag time constant, T4 =28 sec t5s measured reactor vessel average temperature lead/lag time constant, t5 = 4 sec-c6 measured reactor vessel average temperature lag time constant, = 2 sec K 1 Overtemperature AT reactor trip setpoint, K 1 = 1.14 K 2 Overtemperature AT reactor trip setpoint Tavg coefficient, K2 = 0.028/°F K(3 Overtemperature AT reactor trip setpoint pressure coefficient, IK3= 0.00143/psi T' Nominal full power Tavg, T'<_ 592.0 0 F P' Nominal RCS pressure, P' = 2235 psig fl (AI) is a function of the indicated difference between top and bottom detectors of the power-range neutron ion chambers; with gains to be selected based on measured instrument response during plant startup tests such that: (1) For qt -qb between -70% and +8%, fi(AD) 0, where qt and qb are percent RATED THERMAL POWER in the top and bottom halves of the core respectively, and qt + qb is total THERMAL POWER in percent of RATED THERMAL POWER;(2) For each percent that the magnitude of qt -qb exceeds -70%, the AT Trip Setpoint shall be automatically reduced by 0.0% of its value at RATED TEHERMAL POWER; and (3) For each percent that the magnitude of qt -qb exceeds +/-8%, the AT Trip Setpoint shall be automatically reduced by 2.65% of its value at RATED THERMVAL POWER. (Reference 3.6 and Section 4.4.1.2 of Reference 3.7)Over-power AT Setpoint Parameter Values Til measured reactor vessel AT lead/lag time constant, til 8 sec T2 measured reactor vessel AT lead/lag time constant, tc2 =3 sec-r3 measured reactor vessel AT lag time constant, T13 =2 sec-r6 measured reactor vessel average temperature lag time constant, "T6 = 2 sec-r7 Time constant utilized in the rate-lag compensator for Tavg, "T7 -- 10 sec K4 Overpower AT reactor trip setpoint, IK4 = 1.08 K5 Overpower AT reactor trip setpoint Tavg rate/lag coefficient, Ks = 0.02/°F for increasing average temperature, and Ks = 0 for decreasing average temperature K6 Overpower AT reactor trip setpoint Tavg heatup coefficient K(6 = 0.002/°F for T >T", and K6 = 0 for T _ T" T" Indicated full power Tavg, T"< 592.0 0 F f 2 (AI) = 0 for all (AI)
-Unit 1 Cycle 20 Nlear Operating Com.pany Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0* rPage4 of 16 2.3 SHUTDOWN MARGIN (Specification 3.1.1.1): The SHUTDOWN MARGIN shall be: 2.3.1 Greater than 1.3% Ap for MODES 1 and 2** See Special Test Exception 3.10.1 2.3.2 Greater than the limits in Figure 2 for MODES 3 and 4.2.3.3 Greater than the limits in Figure 3 for MODE 5.2.4 MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT (Specification 3.1.1.3): 2.4.1 The BOL, ARO, MTC shall be less positive than the limits shown in Figure 4.2.4.2 The EOL, ARO, HFP, MTC shall be less negative than -62.6 pcm!°F.2.4.3 The 300 ppm, ARO, HFP, MTC shall be less negative than -53.6 pcm/°F (300 ppm Surveillance Limit).Where: BOL stands for Beginning-of-Cycle Life, EOL stands for End-of-Cycle Life, ARO stands for All Rods Out, HFP stands for Hot Full Power (100% RATED THERMAL POWER), HFP vessel average temperature is 592 °F.2.4.4 The Revised Predicted near-EOL 300 ppm MTC shall be calculated using the algorithm from the document referenced by Technical Specification 6.9.1 .6.b. 10: Revised Predicted MTC =Predicted MTC +/- AFD Correction
-3 pcm/°F If the Revised Predicted MTC is less negative than the COLR Section 2.4.3 limit and all of the benchmark data contained in the surveillance procedure are met, then an MTC measurement in accordance with S .R. 4.1.1 .3b is not required.2.5 ROD INSERTION LIMITS (Specification 3.1.3.5 and 3.1.3.6): 2.5.1 All banks shall have the same Full Out Position (FOP) of either 254 or 259 steps withdrawn.
2.5.2 The Control Banks shall be limited in physical insertion as specified in Figure 5.2.5.3 Individual Shutdown bank rods are fully withdrawn when the Bank Demand Indication is at the FOP and the Rod Group Height Limiting Condition for Operation is satisfied (T.S. 3.1.3.1).
IDT 1 Cycle 20 Nuclear Operating Company Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0r Page 5 of 16 2.6 AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE (Specification 3.2.1): 2.6.1 AFD limits as required by Technical Specification 3.2.1 are determined by Constant Axial Offset Control (CAOC) Operations with an AFD target band of +5, -10%.2.6.2 The AFD shall be maintained within the ACCEPTABLE OPERATION portion of Figure 6, as required by Technical Specifications.
2.7 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR (Specification 3.2.2): 2.7.1 = 2.55.2.7.2 K(Z) is provided in Figure 7.2.7.3 The Fx limits for RATED THERMAL POWER (Fx~yP) within specific core planes shall be: 2.7.3.1 Less than or equal to 2.102 for all cycle bumups for all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods, and 2.7.3.2 Less than or equal to the appropriate core height-dependent value from Table 1 for all unrodded core planes.2.7.3.3 PFxy = 0.2.These Fx limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot channel factor FQ(Z) will be limited by Technical Specification 3.2.2 assuming the most-limiting axial power distributions expected to result for the insertion and removal of Control Banks C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions, as described in WCAP-83 85. Therefore, these Fx limits provide assurance that the initial conditions assumed in the LOCA analysis are met, along with the ECCS acceptance criteria of 10 CFR 50.46.2.7.4 Core Power Distribution Measurement Uncertainty for the Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor 2.7.4.1 If the Power Distribution Monitoring System(PDMS) is operable, as defined in the Technical Requirements Manual Section 3.3.3.12, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (UFQ) to be applied to the FQ(Z) and Fxy(Z) using the PDMS shall be calculated by: UFQ :(1.0 + (UQ/IOO))*UE Where: UQ = Uncertainty for power peaking factor as defined in Equation 5-19 from the document referenced by Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.b.l11 UE = Engineering uncertainty factor of 1.03.This uncertainty is calculated and applied automatically by the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS).
IPD 3 Unit 1 Cycle 20 Nuclear Operating Company Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 6 of 16 2.7.4.2 If the moveable detector system is used, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (UJFQ) to be applied to the FQ(Z) and Fxy(Z) shall be calculated by: UFQ = UQU*UE Where: UQU = Base FQ measurement uncertainty of 1.05.UE =Engineering uncertainty factor of 1.03.2.8 ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR (Specification 3.2.3): 2.8.1 = 1.62 2.8.2 PFAriH 0.3 2.8.3 Core Power Distribution Measurement Uncertainty for the Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor 2.8.3.1 If the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS) is operable, as defined in the Technical Requirements Manual Section 3.3.3.12, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (UFAH) to be applied to the using the PDMS shall be the greater of: UFAH= 1.04 OR UFAH = 1.0 + (UJA/I00)Where: UAH = Uncertainty for power peaking factor as defined in Equation 5-19 from the document referenced in Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.b.1 1.This uncertainty is calculated and applied automatically by the Power Distribution Monitoring System.2.8.3.2 If the moveable detector system is used, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (UFAH) shall be: UFAn= 1.0 4 RUnit 1 Cycle 20 Nuclear Operating Company Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0r Page 7 of 16 2.9 DNB PARAMETERS (Specification 3.2.5): 2.9.1 The following DNB-related parameters shall be maintained within the following limits:1 2.9.1.1 Reactor Coolant System Tavg _< 595 °F 2, 2.9.1.2 Pressurizer Pressure > 2200 psig 3, 2.9.1.3 Minimum Measured Reactor Coolant System Flow > 403,000 gpm 4.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to D. F. Hoppes (STPNOC), "South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Unit 1 Cycle 20 Final Reload Evaluation" NF-TG-1 5-62 (ST-UB-NOC-15003490 dated September 22, 2015.3.2 NUREG-1346, Technical Specifications, South Texas Project Unit Nos. 1 and 2.3.3 STPNOC Calculation ZC-7035, Rev. 2, "Loop Uncertainty Calculation for RCS Tavg Instrumentation," Section 10.1.3.4 STPNOC Calculation ZC-7032, Rev. 6, "Loop Uncertainty Calculation for Narrow Range Pressurizer Pressure Monitoring Instrumentation," Section 2.3, Page 9.3.5 5Z529ZB0 1025 Rev. 4, Design Basis Document, Technical Specifications
/LCO, Tech Spec Section 3.2.5.c.3.6 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to D. F. Hoppes (STPNOC), "South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Documentation of the f 1 (AI) Function in OTAT Setpoint Calculation," NF-TG- 11-93 (ST-UB-NOC-11003215) dated November 10, 2011.3.7 Document RSE-U1, Rev. 4, "Unit 1 Cycle 20 Reload Safety Evaluation and Core Operating Limits Report." (CR Action 14-10332-9)
SA discussion of the processes to be used to take these readings is provided in the basis for Technical Specification 3.2.5.2 Includes a 1.9 °F measurement uncertainty per Reference 3.3, Page 37.3Limit not applicable during either a Thermal Power ramp in excess of 5% of RTP per minute or a Thermal Power step in excess of 10% RTP. Per Technical Specification 3.2.5 Bases, this includes a 10.7 psi measurement uncertainty as read on the QDPS display, which is bounded by the 9.6 psi averaged measurement calculated in Reference 3.4.4Includes the most linmiting flow measurement uncertainty of 2.8% from Reference 3.5.
fl lUnit 1 Cycee20 Nucea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 8 of 16 Figure 1 Reactor Core Safety Limits -Four Loops in Operation 680 ,-, 620 600 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Rated Thermal Power (%)
fl lUnitl1 Cycle 20 Nulea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 flE D Page 9 of 16 Figure 2 Required Shutdown Margin for Modes 3 & 4 7.0 6.0 5.0 C.)3.0 20 13.0 2.0 0400 800 1200 1600 2000 RCS Critical Boron Concentration (ppm)(for ARI minus most reactive stuck rod)2400 f l lUnit 1 Cycleo20 Nucea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Lhnits Report Rev. 0 Page 10 of 16 Figure 3 Required Shutdown Margin for Mode 5 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 20 1- .0 03.0 0 400 800 1200 1600 RCS Critical Boron Concentration (ppm)(for ARI minus most reactive stuck rod)2000 2400 Unitl1Cycle 20 Nulea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 11 of 16 Figure 4 MTC versus Power Level 7.0 6.0 5.0 0 S2.0 S1.0~0.0-1.0-2.0-3.0 Unacceptable Acceptable 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Rated Thermal Power (%)70 80 90 100 IP~rBUvit1 Cycleo20 Nulea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 12 of 16 Figure 5 Control Rod Insertion Limits* versus Power Level 260 240 220 200 180 160~,140 O 120 0100 80 60 40 20 l l-l1 l r~lli lllillllllllJl K 4'259): 122 Step Overlap~I (21 ,254): 11 7 ,Step ,Overlap 1 S(79,259): ( 77,254 ): 122 Step Overlap 117 Step Overlap-+ -F -Iii + T h~! ! [ ! I J [ !El [ I V* Coto Bak i s led ihdantul u oiin Full wihrw shl:etecodto hresudw n coto bak ar at th oiino ihr24o 5 tp 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Rated Thermal Power (%)
PT M Unitl1 Cycleo20 Nulea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 13 of 16 Figure 6 AFD Limits versus Power Level 120 110 100 90 80-0 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 (11,90) -I --Uncepal Unaccptabl
-Acetal ---50 30 10 010 20 30 40 50 Axial Flux Difference
(% Delta-I)
IP~ffUnit 1 Cycleo20 Nulea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 14 of 16 Figure 7 K(Z) -Normalized FQ (Z) versus Core Height 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8.~0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0-- -- t--- --I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I [ [ I-- II--~---I----t----l1 I I! I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I -I ---I ----I---I- [ -- --I-----I-I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l I I I I I I I l l I I I : I : : I I : ; 1 1 I I I I I I I 1-4--I IfIII II I II I I I -t--F I 1 I iITIII I II I I I I I [ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ; I I ; I! I I I I I I I t--b -I I I I I I I I 1 I ci 1 I I I I I I [ I I I I II I I I I I l I---I -- I--I--l I I I I I I I I I [ I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I [ P I I I I [ I I I I 1 1 I I I r I I I I I I I I [ E I I T I I I I[ I I I I II I I I I-I -t--I-- I--- I I I I I I -------- I- + ------ I I I I I ;! i! !!! 1! i ! i m m ! ! ! !1 1 ! ] !! 1 ! !!Core Elev. (if) FQ K(Z)0.0 2.55 1.0 7.0 2.55 1.0-14.0 2.359 0.925! 1 1 ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! I ! ! 1 ! ! I 1 ! I 1 ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! 1-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I---- I---- I--- I I-- I I I [ I I l I I I [II III l! ! 1 1 ! 1 ! ! ! ! I ! l l L I ! ! l ! ! ! ! l ! ! ! l l ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 1 ! ! ! ! 1 I I I I : I I I I : I I I I r I I I i I ; ; ; ; I ; I ; I 1 I I ; i I ; ; I ; ; ; r I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1I 1 1-I-- --t -- I-4 ---I Il l l l 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Core Height (ft)9 10 11 12 13 14
1 Cycle 20 Nuclear Operating Company Core Operating Limilts Report Rev. 0I 15 ofl16 Table 1 (Part 1 of 2)Unrodded Fx for Each Core Height for Cycle.Burnups Less Than 9000 MWD/MTU Core Height (Ft.)Axial Point Unrodded Fxy Core Height (Ft.)Axial Point Unrodded Fxy 14.0 13.8 13.6 13.4 13.2 13.0 12.8 12.6 12.4 12.2 12.0 11.8 11.6 11.4 11.2 11.0 10.8 10.6 10.4 10.2 10.0 9.8 9.6 9.4 9.2 9.0 8.8 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.0 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 7.3 17 5.739 4.158 2.789 2.495 2.226 2.138 2.118 2.068 2.022 2.002 2.014 2.037 2.014 1.965 1.933 1.925 1.920 1.918 1.93 8 1.973 1.98 1 1.943 1.908 1.904 1.895 1.896 1.916 1.983 2.036 1.977 1.925 1.929 1.945 1.947 1.939 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.2 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 1.972 1.993 1.975 1.932 1.90 1 1.938 1.952 1.958 2.001 2.058 2.063 2.009 1.946 1.966 1.973 1.965 1.974 2.014 2.039 1.99 1 1.93 8 1.942 1.947 1.952 1.967 1.997 2.004 1.932 1.872 1.912 2.222 3.005 4.318 6.145 9.180 Unt1Cycle 20 Nulea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 16 of 16 Table 1 (Part 2 of 2)Unrodded Fxy for Each Core Height for Cycle Burnups Greater Than or Equal to 9000 MWD/MTU Core Height (Ft.)Axial Point Unrodded Fxy Core Height (Ft.)Axial Point Unrodded Fxy 14.0 13.8 13.6 13.4 13.2 13.0 12.8 12.6 12.4 12.2 12.0 11.8 11.6 11.4 11.2 11.0 10.8 10.6 10.4 10.2 10.0 9.8 9.6 9.4 9.2 9.0 8.8 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.0 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 6.495 5.203 3.9 11 2.790 2.552 2.305 2.160 2.087 2.027 2.02 1 2.030 2.056 2.082 2.074 2.044 2.009 2.03 8 2.046 2.053 2.082 2.127 2.145 2.113 2.088 2.102 2.110 2.114 2.124 2.161 2.194 2.157 2.124 2.126 2.137 2.148 2.160 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.2 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 2.203 2.238 2.204 2.147 2.114 2.106 2.095 2.08 1 2.098 2.13 1 2.125.2.067 2.021 2.016 2.005 1.990 1.992 2.026 2.048 1.990 1.935 1.905 1.875 1.864 1.880 1.926 1.954 1.932 1.945 2.054 2.418 3.143 4.250 5.782 8.469 Nuclear Operating Company South Texas Pro/edt E/ectric Generating SLtaton PCO Box 289 Wadsworth, Texas 77483 :v/v -November 12, 2015 NOC-AE-1 5003304 10 CFR 50.36 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 South Texas Project Unit 1 Docket No. STN 50-498 Unit 1 Cycle 20 Core Operatincq Limits Report In accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.1 .6.d, STP Nuclear Operating Company submits the attached Core Operating Limits Report for Unit 1 Cycle 20. The report covers the core design changes made during the 1RE19 refueling outage.There are no commitments in this letter.If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact Marilyn Kistler at (361)972-8385 or me at (361) 972-7743.Roland F. Dunn Manager, Nuclear Fuel & Analysis mk
Attachment:
South Texas Project Unit 1 Cycle 20 Core Operating Limits Report, Revision 0 STI: 34235347 NOC-AE-1 5003304 Page 2 of 2 CC: (paper copy)Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1600 East Lamar Boulevard Arlington, TX 76011-4511 Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North (08 H04)11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 NRC Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0. Box 289, Mail Code: MNIl16 Wadsworth, TX 77483 (electronic copy)Morgqan. Lewis & Bockius LLP Steve Frantz, Esquire U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa M. Regner NRG South Texas LP John Ragan Chris O'Hara Jim von Suskil CPS Energqy Kevin Polio Cris Eugster L. D. Blaylock Crain Caton & James, P.C.Peter Nemeth City of Austin Cheryl Mele John Wester Texas Dept. of State Health Services Richard A. Ratliff Robert Free Nuclear Operating Company SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT Unit 1 Cycle 20 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT Revision 0 Core Operating Limits Report Pg f1 Page 1 of 16 l~ 1 Cycle 20 Nuclear Operating Company Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0rPage 2 of 16 1.0 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report for STPEGS Unit 1 Cycle 20 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.6. The core operating limits have been developed using the NRC-approved methodologies specified in Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.The Technical Specifications affected by this report are: 1) 2.1 SAFETY LIMITS 2) 2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 3) 3/4.1.1.1 SHUTDOWN MARGIN 4) 3/4.1.1.3 MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT LIMITS 5) 3/4.1.3.5 SHUTDOWN ROD INSERTION LIMITS 6) 3/4.1.3.6 CONTROL ROD INSERTION LIMITS 7) 3/4.2.1 AFD LIMITS 8) 3/4.2.2 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR 9) 3/4.2.3 NUCLEAR ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR 10) 3/4.2.5 DNB PARAMETERS 2.0 OPERATING LIMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section 1.0 are presented below.2.1 SAFETY LIMITS (Specification 2.1):*2.1.1 The combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) shall not exceed the limits shown in Figure 1.2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS (Specification 2.2): 2.2.1 2.2.1 The Loop design flow for Reactor Coolant Flow-Low is 98,000 gpm.
B .Unit 1 Cycle 20 Nuclear Operating Company Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 mr r Page 3 of 16 2.2.2 The Over-temperature AT and Over-power AT setpoint parameter values are listed below: Over-temperature AT Setpoint Parameter Valuesmeasured reactor vessel AT lead/lag time constant, Ti 8 sec t2 measured reactor vessel AT lead/lag time constant, T2 --3 secmeasured reactor vessel AT lag time constant, T3 = 2 sec t 4 measured reactor vessel average temperature lead/lag time constant, T4 =28 sec t5s measured reactor vessel average temperature lead/lag time constant, t5 = 4 sec-c6 measured reactor vessel average temperature lag time constant, = 2 sec K 1 Overtemperature AT reactor trip setpoint, K 1 = 1.14 K 2 Overtemperature AT reactor trip setpoint Tavg coefficient, K2 = 0.028/°F K(3 Overtemperature AT reactor trip setpoint pressure coefficient, IK3= 0.00143/psi T' Nominal full power Tavg, T'<_ 592.0 0 F P' Nominal RCS pressure, P' = 2235 psig fl (AI) is a function of the indicated difference between top and bottom detectors of the power-range neutron ion chambers; with gains to be selected based on measured instrument response during plant startup tests such that: (1) For qt -qb between -70% and +8%, fi(AD) 0, where qt and qb are percent RATED THERMAL POWER in the top and bottom halves of the core respectively, and qt + qb is total THERMAL POWER in percent of RATED THERMAL POWER;(2) For each percent that the magnitude of qt -qb exceeds -70%, the AT Trip Setpoint shall be automatically reduced by 0.0% of its value at RATED TEHERMAL POWER; and (3) For each percent that the magnitude of qt -qb exceeds +/-8%, the AT Trip Setpoint shall be automatically reduced by 2.65% of its value at RATED THERMVAL POWER. (Reference 3.6 and Section 4.4.1.2 of Reference 3.7)Over-power AT Setpoint Parameter Values Til measured reactor vessel AT lead/lag time constant, til 8 sec T2 measured reactor vessel AT lead/lag time constant, tc2 =3 sec-r3 measured reactor vessel AT lag time constant, T13 =2 sec-r6 measured reactor vessel average temperature lag time constant, "T6 = 2 sec-r7 Time constant utilized in the rate-lag compensator for Tavg, "T7 -- 10 sec K4 Overpower AT reactor trip setpoint, IK4 = 1.08 K5 Overpower AT reactor trip setpoint Tavg rate/lag coefficient, Ks = 0.02/°F for increasing average temperature, and Ks = 0 for decreasing average temperature K6 Overpower AT reactor trip setpoint Tavg heatup coefficient K(6 = 0.002/°F for T >T", and K6 = 0 for T _ T" T" Indicated full power Tavg, T"< 592.0 0 F f 2 (AI) = 0 for all (AI)
-Unit 1 Cycle 20 Nlear Operating Com.pany Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0* rPage4 of 16 2.3 SHUTDOWN MARGIN (Specification 3.1.1.1): The SHUTDOWN MARGIN shall be: 2.3.1 Greater than 1.3% Ap for MODES 1 and 2** See Special Test Exception 3.10.1 2.3.2 Greater than the limits in Figure 2 for MODES 3 and 4.2.3.3 Greater than the limits in Figure 3 for MODE 5.2.4 MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT (Specification 3.1.1.3): 2.4.1 The BOL, ARO, MTC shall be less positive than the limits shown in Figure 4.2.4.2 The EOL, ARO, HFP, MTC shall be less negative than -62.6 pcm!°F.2.4.3 The 300 ppm, ARO, HFP, MTC shall be less negative than -53.6 pcm/°F (300 ppm Surveillance Limit).Where: BOL stands for Beginning-of-Cycle Life, EOL stands for End-of-Cycle Life, ARO stands for All Rods Out, HFP stands for Hot Full Power (100% RATED THERMAL POWER), HFP vessel average temperature is 592 °F.2.4.4 The Revised Predicted near-EOL 300 ppm MTC shall be calculated using the algorithm from the document referenced by Technical Specification 6.9.1 .6.b. 10: Revised Predicted MTC =Predicted MTC +/- AFD Correction
-3 pcm/°F If the Revised Predicted MTC is less negative than the COLR Section 2.4.3 limit and all of the benchmark data contained in the surveillance procedure are met, then an MTC measurement in accordance with S .R. 4.1.1 .3b is not required.2.5 ROD INSERTION LIMITS (Specification 3.1.3.5 and 3.1.3.6): 2.5.1 All banks shall have the same Full Out Position (FOP) of either 254 or 259 steps withdrawn.
2.5.2 The Control Banks shall be limited in physical insertion as specified in Figure 5.2.5.3 Individual Shutdown bank rods are fully withdrawn when the Bank Demand Indication is at the FOP and the Rod Group Height Limiting Condition for Operation is satisfied (T.S. 3.1.3.1).
IDT 1 Cycle 20 Nuclear Operating Company Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0r Page 5 of 16 2.6 AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE (Specification 3.2.1): 2.6.1 AFD limits as required by Technical Specification 3.2.1 are determined by Constant Axial Offset Control (CAOC) Operations with an AFD target band of +5, -10%.2.6.2 The AFD shall be maintained within the ACCEPTABLE OPERATION portion of Figure 6, as required by Technical Specifications.
2.7 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR (Specification 3.2.2): 2.7.1 = 2.55.2.7.2 K(Z) is provided in Figure 7.2.7.3 The Fx limits for RATED THERMAL POWER (Fx~yP) within specific core planes shall be: 2.7.3.1 Less than or equal to 2.102 for all cycle bumups for all core planes containing Bank "D" control rods, and 2.7.3.2 Less than or equal to the appropriate core height-dependent value from Table 1 for all unrodded core planes.2.7.3.3 PFxy = 0.2.These Fx limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot channel factor FQ(Z) will be limited by Technical Specification 3.2.2 assuming the most-limiting axial power distributions expected to result for the insertion and removal of Control Banks C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power distributions, as described in WCAP-83 85. Therefore, these Fx limits provide assurance that the initial conditions assumed in the LOCA analysis are met, along with the ECCS acceptance criteria of 10 CFR 50.46.2.7.4 Core Power Distribution Measurement Uncertainty for the Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor 2.7.4.1 If the Power Distribution Monitoring System(PDMS) is operable, as defined in the Technical Requirements Manual Section 3.3.3.12, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (UFQ) to be applied to the FQ(Z) and Fxy(Z) using the PDMS shall be calculated by: UFQ :(1.0 + (UQ/IOO))*UE Where: UQ = Uncertainty for power peaking factor as defined in Equation 5-19 from the document referenced by Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.b.l11 UE = Engineering uncertainty factor of 1.03.This uncertainty is calculated and applied automatically by the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS).
IPD 3 Unit 1 Cycle 20 Nuclear Operating Company Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 6 of 16 2.7.4.2 If the moveable detector system is used, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (UJFQ) to be applied to the FQ(Z) and Fxy(Z) shall be calculated by: UFQ = UQU*UE Where: UQU = Base FQ measurement uncertainty of 1.05.UE =Engineering uncertainty factor of 1.03.2.8 ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR (Specification 3.2.3): 2.8.1 = 1.62 2.8.2 PFAriH 0.3 2.8.3 Core Power Distribution Measurement Uncertainty for the Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor 2.8.3.1 If the Power Distribution Monitoring System (PDMS) is operable, as defined in the Technical Requirements Manual Section 3.3.3.12, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (UFAH) to be applied to the using the PDMS shall be the greater of: UFAH= 1.04 OR UFAH = 1.0 + (UJA/I00)Where: UAH = Uncertainty for power peaking factor as defined in Equation 5-19 from the document referenced in Technical Specification 6.9.1.6.b.1 1.This uncertainty is calculated and applied automatically by the Power Distribution Monitoring System.2.8.3.2 If the moveable detector system is used, the core power distribution measurement uncertainty (UFAH) shall be: UFAn= 1.0 4 RUnit 1 Cycle 20 Nuclear Operating Company Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0r Page 7 of 16 2.9 DNB PARAMETERS (Specification 3.2.5): 2.9.1 The following DNB-related parameters shall be maintained within the following limits:1 2.9.1.1 Reactor Coolant System Tavg _< 595 °F 2, 2.9.1.2 Pressurizer Pressure > 2200 psig 3, 2.9.1.3 Minimum Measured Reactor Coolant System Flow > 403,000 gpm 4.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to D. F. Hoppes (STPNOC), "South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Unit 1 Cycle 20 Final Reload Evaluation" NF-TG-1 5-62 (ST-UB-NOC-15003490 dated September 22, 2015.3.2 NUREG-1346, Technical Specifications, South Texas Project Unit Nos. 1 and 2.3.3 STPNOC Calculation ZC-7035, Rev. 2, "Loop Uncertainty Calculation for RCS Tavg Instrumentation," Section 10.1.3.4 STPNOC Calculation ZC-7032, Rev. 6, "Loop Uncertainty Calculation for Narrow Range Pressurizer Pressure Monitoring Instrumentation," Section 2.3, Page 9.3.5 5Z529ZB0 1025 Rev. 4, Design Basis Document, Technical Specifications
/LCO, Tech Spec Section 3.2.5.c.3.6 Letter from J. M. Ralston (Westinghouse) to D. F. Hoppes (STPNOC), "South Texas Project Electric Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Documentation of the f 1 (AI) Function in OTAT Setpoint Calculation," NF-TG- 11-93 (ST-UB-NOC-11003215) dated November 10, 2011.3.7 Document RSE-U1, Rev. 4, "Unit 1 Cycle 20 Reload Safety Evaluation and Core Operating Limits Report." (CR Action 14-10332-9)
SA discussion of the processes to be used to take these readings is provided in the basis for Technical Specification 3.2.5.2 Includes a 1.9 °F measurement uncertainty per Reference 3.3, Page 37.3Limit not applicable during either a Thermal Power ramp in excess of 5% of RTP per minute or a Thermal Power step in excess of 10% RTP. Per Technical Specification 3.2.5 Bases, this includes a 10.7 psi measurement uncertainty as read on the QDPS display, which is bounded by the 9.6 psi averaged measurement calculated in Reference 3.4.4Includes the most linmiting flow measurement uncertainty of 2.8% from Reference 3.5.
fl lUnit 1 Cycee20 Nucea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 8 of 16 Figure 1 Reactor Core Safety Limits -Four Loops in Operation 680 ,-, 620 600 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Rated Thermal Power (%)
fl lUnitl1 Cycle 20 Nulea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 flE D Page 9 of 16 Figure 2 Required Shutdown Margin for Modes 3 & 4 7.0 6.0 5.0 C.)3.0 20 13.0 2.0 0400 800 1200 1600 2000 RCS Critical Boron Concentration (ppm)(for ARI minus most reactive stuck rod)2400 f l lUnit 1 Cycleo20 Nucea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Lhnits Report Rev. 0 Page 10 of 16 Figure 3 Required Shutdown Margin for Mode 5 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 20 1- .0 03.0 0 400 800 1200 1600 RCS Critical Boron Concentration (ppm)(for ARI minus most reactive stuck rod)2000 2400 Unitl1Cycle 20 Nulea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 11 of 16 Figure 4 MTC versus Power Level 7.0 6.0 5.0 0 S2.0 S1.0~0.0-1.0-2.0-3.0 Unacceptable Acceptable 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Rated Thermal Power (%)70 80 90 100 IP~rBUvit1 Cycleo20 Nulea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 12 of 16 Figure 5 Control Rod Insertion Limits* versus Power Level 260 240 220 200 180 160~,140 O 120 0100 80 60 40 20 l l-l1 l r~lli lllillllllllJl K 4'259): 122 Step Overlap~I (21 ,254): 11 7 ,Step ,Overlap 1 S(79,259): ( 77,254 ): 122 Step Overlap 117 Step Overlap-+ -F -Iii + T h~! ! [ ! I J [ !El [ I V* Coto Bak i s led ihdantul u oiin Full wihrw shl:etecodto hresudw n coto bak ar at th oiino ihr24o 5 tp 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Rated Thermal Power (%)
PT M Unitl1 Cycleo20 Nulea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 13 of 16 Figure 6 AFD Limits versus Power Level 120 110 100 90 80-0 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 (11,90) -I --Uncepal Unaccptabl
-Acetal ---50 30 10 010 20 30 40 50 Axial Flux Difference
(% Delta-I)
IP~ffUnit 1 Cycleo20 Nulea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 14 of 16 Figure 7 K(Z) -Normalized FQ (Z) versus Core Height 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8.~0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0-- -- t--- --I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I [ [ I-- II--~---I----t----l1 I I! I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I -I ---I ----I---I- [ -- --I-----I-I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l I I I I I I I l l I I I : I : : I I : ; 1 1 I I I I I I I 1-4--I IfIII II I II I I I -t--F I 1 I iITIII I II I I I I I [ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ; I I ; I! I I I I I I I t--b -I I I I I I I I 1 I ci 1 I I I I I I [ I I I I II I I I I I l I---I -- I--I--l I I I I I I I I I [ I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I [ P I I I I [ I I I I 1 1 I I I r I I I I I I I I [ E I I T I I I I[ I I I I II I I I I-I -t--I-- I--- I I I I I I -------- I- + ------ I I I I I ;! i! !!! 1! i ! i m m ! ! ! !1 1 ! ] !! 1 ! !!Core Elev. (if) FQ K(Z)0.0 2.55 1.0 7.0 2.55 1.0-14.0 2.359 0.925! 1 1 ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! I ! ! 1 ! ! I 1 ! I 1 ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! 1-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I---- I---- I--- I I-- I I I [ I I l I I I [II III l! ! 1 1 ! 1 ! ! ! ! I ! l l L I ! ! l ! ! ! ! l ! ! ! l l ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 1 ! ! ! ! 1 I I I I : I I I I : I I I I r I I I i I ; ; ; ; I ; I ; I 1 I I ; i I ; ; I ; ; ; r I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1I 1 1-I-- --t -- I-4 ---I Il l l l 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Core Height (ft)9 10 11 12 13 14
1 Cycle 20 Nuclear Operating Company Core Operating Limilts Report Rev. 0I 15 ofl16 Table 1 (Part 1 of 2)Unrodded Fx for Each Core Height for Cycle.Burnups Less Than 9000 MWD/MTU Core Height (Ft.)Axial Point Unrodded Fxy Core Height (Ft.)Axial Point Unrodded Fxy 14.0 13.8 13.6 13.4 13.2 13.0 12.8 12.6 12.4 12.2 12.0 11.8 11.6 11.4 11.2 11.0 10.8 10.6 10.4 10.2 10.0 9.8 9.6 9.4 9.2 9.0 8.8 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.0 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 7.3 17 5.739 4.158 2.789 2.495 2.226 2.138 2.118 2.068 2.022 2.002 2.014 2.037 2.014 1.965 1.933 1.925 1.920 1.918 1.93 8 1.973 1.98 1 1.943 1.908 1.904 1.895 1.896 1.916 1.983 2.036 1.977 1.925 1.929 1.945 1.947 1.939 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.2 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 1.972 1.993 1.975 1.932 1.90 1 1.938 1.952 1.958 2.001 2.058 2.063 2.009 1.946 1.966 1.973 1.965 1.974 2.014 2.039 1.99 1 1.93 8 1.942 1.947 1.952 1.967 1.997 2.004 1.932 1.872 1.912 2.222 3.005 4.318 6.145 9.180 Unt1Cycle 20 Nulea Oprtn Copn Core Operating Limits Report Rev. 0 Page 16 of 16 Table 1 (Part 2 of 2)Unrodded Fxy for Each Core Height for Cycle Burnups Greater Than or Equal to 9000 MWD/MTU Core Height (Ft.)Axial Point Unrodded Fxy Core Height (Ft.)Axial Point Unrodded Fxy 14.0 13.8 13.6 13.4 13.2 13.0 12.8 12.6 12.4 12.2 12.0 11.8 11.6 11.4 11.2 11.0 10.8 10.6 10.4 10.2 10.0 9.8 9.6 9.4 9.2 9.0 8.8 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.0 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 6.495 5.203 3.9 11 2.790 2.552 2.305 2.160 2.087 2.027 2.02 1 2.030 2.056 2.082 2.074 2.044 2.009 2.03 8 2.046 2.053 2.082 2.127 2.145 2.113 2.088 2.102 2.110 2.114 2.124 2.161 2.194 2.157 2.124 2.126 2.137 2.148 2.160 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.2 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 2.203 2.238 2.204 2.147 2.114 2.106 2.095 2.08 1 2.098 2.13 1 2.125.2.067 2.021 2.016 2.005 1.990 1.992 2.026 2.048 1.990 1.935 1.905 1.875 1.864 1.880 1.926 1.954 1.932 1.945 2.054 2.418 3.143 4.250 5.782 8.469