NRC Generic Letter 1999-02: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:-ERRATA -UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001August 23, 1999NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA): LABORATORY TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADEACTIVATED CHARCOAL
{{#Wiki_filter:-ERRATA -UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY  
COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 23, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):  
LABORATORY  
TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADE
ACTIVATED
CHARCOAL  


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who havepermanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removedfrom the reactor vessel.DiscussionA typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, 'Laboratory Testing ofNuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in whichit appears technically incorrect. This sentence appears in two places, namely, in RequestedActions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads "If the systemhas a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification] should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read 'If thesystem has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revisedTS should specify the face velocity."If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listedbelow or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.David B. Matthews, DireDivision of Regulatory Improvement ProgramsOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contact: John P. Segala, NRR301-415-1858Internet: jpsl nrc.govLead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR T +9 J jQ301-415-2020 cAc r .Internet: blm~nrc.gov99080 osoewOo 99ZA  
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, 'Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.
-ERRATA -: -/n (',,A tUNITED STATESINUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIUrs {> -/OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIO9 P /WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001August 23, 1999NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA): LABORATORY TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADEACTIVATED CHARCOAL
 
This sentence appears in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads "If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]  
should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read 'If the system has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.David B. Matthews, Dire Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contact: John P. Segala, NRR 301-415-1858 Internet:  
jpsl nrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR T +9 J jQ 301-415-2020  
cAc r .Internet:  
blm~nrc.gov
99080 osoewOo 99ZA  
-ERRATA -: -/n (',,A t UNITED STATES INUCLEAR REGULATORY  
COMMISSIUrs  
{> -/OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIO9 P /WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 23, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):  
LABORATORY  
TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADE
ACTIVATED
CHARCOAL  


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who havepermanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removedfrom the reactor vessel.DiscussionA typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, 'Laboratory Testing ofNuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in whichit appears technically incorrect. This sentence appears in two places, namely, in RequestedActions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads 'If the systemhas a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification] should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read "If thesystem has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revisedTS should specify the face velocity." ';If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listedbelow or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed byScott F. NAerry FORDavid B. Matthews, DirectorDivision of Regulatory Improvement ProgramsOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contact: John P. Segala, NRR301-415-1858Internet: jpslnrc.govLead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR301-415-2020Internet: blm~nrc.govDOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\ws\errata.wpdTo receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachmentlenclosure N = No copyOFFICE REXB i Tch Ed SPL C:REXB DiDNAME JShapaker _____annonMarsh D1_ _DATE c/ 'I99 1 Y99 .I'99 ,liv99 N g*9OFFICIAL RECORD COPY9908060152 {k 4on l  
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, 'Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.
-ERRATA -UNITED STATESiNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001August 23, 1999NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA): LABORATORY TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADEACTIVATED CHARCOAL
 
This sentence appears in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads 'If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]  
should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read "If the system has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." ';If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed by Scott F. NAerry FOR David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contact: John P. Segala, NRR 301-415-1858 Internet:  
jpslnrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR 301-415-2020
Internet:  
blm~nrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\ws\errata.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachmentlenclosure N = No copy OFFICE REXB i Tch Ed SPL C:REXB DiD NAME JShapaker  
_____annonMarsh D1_ _DATE c/ 'I99 1 Y99 .I'99 ,liv99 N g*9 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9908060152
{k 4on l  
-ERRATA -UNITED STATES iNUCLEAR REGULATORY  
COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 23, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):  
LABORATORY  
TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADE
ACTIVATED
CHARCOAL  


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who havepermanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removedfrom the reactor vessel.DiscussionA typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, "Laboratory Testing ofNuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in whichit appears technically incorrect. This sentence appears in two places, namely, in RequestedActions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads "If the systemhas a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification] should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read "If thesystem has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revisedTS should specify the face velocity."If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listedbelow or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed byScott F. Nberry FORDavid B. Matthews, DirectorDivision of Regulatory Improvement ProgramsOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contact: John P. Segala, NRR301-415-1858Internet: jpsl @nrc.govLead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR301-415-2020Internet: blm@nrc.govDOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\jws\errata.wpdTo receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy wlo attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachmentlenclosure N = No copyOFFICE I EETech Ed SPLB lC:REXB l D:PXPZNAME JShapaker _annon IMarsh _1_6___th__DATE J199 '7/c'd999 //(W9 kv99 s X99 jOFFICIAL RECORD COPY9908060152
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, "Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.
-ERRATA -UNITED STATES-NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001August 12, 1999NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA): LABORATORY TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GEACTIVATED CHARCOAL
 
This sentence appears in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads "If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]  
should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read "If the system has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed by Scott F. Nberry FOR David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contact: John P. Segala, NRR 301-415-1858 Internet:  
jpsl @nrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR 301-415-2020
Internet:  
blm@nrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\jws\errata.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy wlo attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachmentlenclosure N = No copy OFFICE I EETech Ed SPLB lC:REXB l D:PXPZ NAME JShapaker  
_annon IMarsh _1_6___th__
DATE J199 '7/c'd999  
//(W9 kv99 s X 9 9 j OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9908060152
-ERRATA -UNITED STATES-NUCLEAR REGULATORY  
COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 12, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):  
LABORATORY  
TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GE
ACTIVATED
CHARCOAL  


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except thos who havepermanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has bee ermanently removedfrom the reactor vessel.DiscussionA typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, "Laboratory Testing ofNuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3 A999 that makes the sentence in whichit appears technically incorrect. This sentence apppWrs in two places, namely, in RequestedActions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads 'If the systemhas a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0/203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification] should specify the fa velocity." This sentence should read "If thesystem has a face velocity greater than II9i percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revisedTS should specify the face velocity."If you have any questions about this Patter, please contact one of the staff members listedbelow or the appropriate Office of Nuiclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager./ David B. Matthews, DirectorDivision of Regulatory Improvement ProgramsOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contpct: John P. Segala, NRR1f 301-415-1858Internet: jpsl@nrc.govLead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR301-415-2020Internet: blmenrc.govDOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\jws\errata.wpdTo receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N = No copyOFFICE REXB l lITech Ed l PL C RE 'd lNAME JShapakeAlj i CA a <JHan no'l _________ DMatthewsl DATE -/6/99 M mJ,/9 9 ' h1/Iw99 / 199 Jv !OFFICIAL RECORD COPY9908060152
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except thos who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has bee ermanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, "Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3 A999 that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.
-ERRATA-UNITED STATESN-UCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSkI.OOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001August 23, 1999NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA): LABORATORY TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADEACTIVATED CHARCOAL
 
This sentence apppWrs in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads 'If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0/203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]  
should specify the fa velocity." This sentence should read "If the system has a face velocity greater than II9i percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." If you have any questions about this Patter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuiclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager./ David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contpct: John P. Segala, NRR 1f 301-415-1858 Internet:  
jpsl@nrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR 301-415-2020
Internet:  
blmenrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\jws\errata.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N = No copy OFFICE REXB l lITech Ed l PL C RE 'd lNAME JShapakeAlj i CA a <JHan no'l _________  
DMatthewsl DATE -/6/99 M mJ,/9 9 ' h1/Iw99 / 199 J v !OFFICIAL  
RECORD COPY 9908060152
-ERRATA-UNITED STATES N-UCLEAR REGULATORY  
COMMISSkI.O
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 23, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):  
LABORATORY  
TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADE
ACTIVATED
CHARCOAL  


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who havepermanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removedfrom the reactor vessel.DiscussionA typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, *Laboratory Testing ofNuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in whichit appears technically incorrect. This sentence appears in two places, namely, in RequestedActions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads "If the systemhas a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification] should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read 'If thesystem has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revisedTS should specify the face velocity."If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listedbelow or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed byScott F. wtberry FORDavid B. Matthews, DirectorDivision of Regulatory Improvement ProgramsOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contact: John P. Segala, NRR301-415-1858Internet: jpsl @nrc.govLead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR301-415-2020Internet: bIm~nrc.govDOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\jws\errata.wpdTo receive a copy of this document. indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N No copyllOFFICE lREXB l lTech Ed I l: PPBllCRXNAME JShapaker SMannonLarsh D IIIl DATE / I'/99 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I_ __ __9 _ ___9 0'19-OFFICIAL RECORD COPY9908060152
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, *Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.
}}
 
This sentence appears in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads "If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]  
should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read 'If the system has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed by Scott F. wtberry FOR David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contact: John P. Segala, NRR 301-415-1858 Internet:  
jpsl @nrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR 301-415-2020
Internet:  
bIm~nrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\jws\errata.wpd To receive a copy of this document.
 
indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N No copyllOFFICE lREXB l lTech Ed I l: PPBllCRX NAME JShapaker SMannonLarsh D IIIl DATE / I'/99 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I_ __ __9 _ ___9 0'19-OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9908060152}}


{{GL-Nav}}
{{GL-Nav}}

Revision as of 12:48, 31 August 2018

NRC Generic Letter 1999-002: (Errata): Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal
ML031110094
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Washington Public Power Supply System, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Clinch River, Crane  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/23/1999
From: Matthews D B
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
To:
References
GL-99-002, NUDOCS 9908060152
Download: ML031110094 (5)


-ERRATA -UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 23, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):

LABORATORY

TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADE

ACTIVATED

CHARCOAL

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, 'Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.

This sentence appears in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads "If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]

should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read 'If the system has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.David B. Matthews, Dire Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contact: John P. Segala, NRR 301-415-1858 Internet:

jpsl nrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR T +9 J jQ 301-415-2020

cAc r .Internet:

blm~nrc.gov

99080 osoewOo 99ZA

-ERRATA -: -/n (',,A t UNITED STATES INUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSIUrs

{> -/OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIO9 P /WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 23, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):

LABORATORY

TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADE

ACTIVATED

CHARCOAL

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, 'Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.

This sentence appears in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads 'If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]

should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read "If the system has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." ';If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed by Scott F. NAerry FOR David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contact: John P. Segala, NRR 301-415-1858 Internet:

jpslnrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR 301-415-2020

Internet:

blm~nrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\ws\errata.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachmentlenclosure N = No copy OFFICE REXB i Tch Ed SPL C:REXB DiD NAME JShapaker

_____annonMarsh D1_ _DATE c/ 'I99 1 Y99 .I'99 ,liv99 N g*9 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9908060152

{k 4on l

-ERRATA -UNITED STATES iNUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 23, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):

LABORATORY

TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADE

ACTIVATED

CHARCOAL

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, "Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.

This sentence appears in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads "If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]

should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read "If the system has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed by Scott F. Nberry FOR David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contact: John P. Segala, NRR 301-415-1858 Internet:

jpsl @nrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR 301-415-2020

Internet:

blm@nrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\jws\errata.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy wlo attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachmentlenclosure N = No copy OFFICE I EETech Ed SPLB lC:REXB l D:PXPZ NAME JShapaker

_annon IMarsh _1_6___th__

DATE J199 '7/c'd999

//(W9 kv99 s X 9 9 j OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9908060152

-ERRATA -UNITED STATES-NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 12, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):

LABORATORY

TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GE

ACTIVATED

CHARCOAL

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except thos who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has bee ermanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, "Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3 A999 that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.

This sentence apppWrs in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads 'If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0/203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]

should specify the fa velocity." This sentence should read "If the system has a face velocity greater than II9i percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." If you have any questions about this Patter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuiclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager./ David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contpct: John P. Segala, NRR 1f 301-415-1858 Internet:

jpsl@nrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR 301-415-2020

Internet:

blmenrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\jws\errata.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N = No copy OFFICE REXB l lITech Ed l PL C RE 'd lNAME JShapakeAlj i CA a <JHan no'l _________

DMatthewsl DATE -/6/99 M mJ,/9 9 ' h1/Iw99 / 199 J v !OFFICIAL

RECORD COPY 9908060152

-ERRATA-UNITED STATES N-UCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSkI.O

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 23, 1999 NRC GENERIC LETTER 99-02 (ERRATA):

LABORATORY

TESTING OF NUCLEAR-GRADE

ACTIVATED

CHARCOAL

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.Discussion A typographical error has been identified in Generic Letter 99-02, *Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal," issued on June 3, 1999, that makes the sentence in which it appears technically incorrect.

This sentence appears in two places, namely, in Requested Actions 2 and 3, on page 7 of the generic letter. The affected sentence reads "If the system has a face velocity greater than 10 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS[technical specification]

should specify the face velocity." This sentence should read 'If the system has a face velocity greater than 110 percent of 0.203 m/s (40 ft/min), then the revised TS should specify the face velocity." If you have any questions about this matter, please contact one of the staff members listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Original signed by Scott F. wtberry FOR David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contact: John P. Segala, NRR 301-415-1858 Internet:

jpsl @nrc.gov Lead project manager: Brenda L. Mozafari, NRR 301-415-2020

Internet:

bIm~nrc.gov DOCUMENT NAME: G:\REXB\jws\errata.wpd To receive a copy of this document.

indicate in the box C=Copy w/o attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N No copyllOFFICE lREXB l lTech Ed I l: PPBllCRX NAME JShapaker SMannonLarsh D IIIl DATE / I'/99 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I_ __ __9 _ ___9 0'19-OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9908060152

Template:GL-Nav