U-600237, Forwards marked-up FSAR Page B-3,providing Clarifications Requested by Adoption of Rev 2 to Visual Weld Acceptance Criteria.... Info Will Be Included in Amend 35 to FSAR
| ML20137G175 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 08/23/1985 |
| From: | Spangenberg F ILLINOIS POWER CO. |
| To: | Butler W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| U-600237, NUDOCS 8508270195 | |
| Download: ML20137G175 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _
1 d
i U-600237 L30-85 (08 -23)-L i
1A.120 l
llLIN018 POWER COMPANY r
iP CLINTON PontR STAflON. P.o. 804 670. CLINTON, ILLINCl3 61727 j
August 23, 1985 i
L l
l Docket No. 50-461 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l
I l
Attnt Mr. W. R. Butler, Chief l
Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Clinton Power Station Unit 1
}
Illinois Power Company Endorsement of Visual j
Weld Acceptanco Criteria (VWAC), Revision 2 i
l Dear Mr. Butlers 1
\\
Please find attached for the Staff's review a marked-up Clinton Final Safety Analysis (FSAR) page B-3.
This mark-up, which will be incorporated into the FSAR in Amendment 35, provides the clarifications requested by the Staff on Illinois Power Company's adoption of the l
Visual Weld Acceptance Criterin (VWAC) for AWS Structural Welding at Nuclear Power Plants, Revision 2.
Your timely review and approval of this material is requested to support the earliest possible implementation of these criteria at CPS.
Please contact us if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sin re yours,n F. A.
Angehscrg Director - Nucicar Licensing Nuclear Station Engineering RTR/kaf Attachment cc:
B. L. Siegel, NRC Clinton Licensing Project Manager NRC Resident Office Regional Administrator, Region III, USNRC Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety N
8508270195 H50023 PDM ADOCK 05000461 A
PDH gg
t g
t'v ;
CPS-FSAR AMENDMENT 34 JULY 1985
[
i examination, except that welds impractical to
.diograph were i
examined by ultrasonic and either magnetic particle or liquid l
penetrant methods.
The above nondestructive test methods were in compliance with applicable sections of the following ASTM specifications:
[
l s
a.
E94-68, " Recommended Practice for Radiographic Testing,"
I b.
E142-77, " Controlling Quality of Radiographic Testing,"
c.
E164-74, " Recommended Practice for Ultrasonic Contract Examination of Weldments,"
d.
E109-63, " Dry Powder Magnetic Particle Inspection,"
e.
E138-63, " Wet Magnetic Particle Inspection,"
\\
f.
E165-75, " Recommended Practice for Liquid Penetrant Inspection Method," and 6
L g.
AWS D1.1. (as clarified VWAC, navision 2).
l L
All other weld joints including fillet welds, were 100% visually examined.
The visual examination conformed to all applicable requirements of AWS Dl.1 through July 1985 Visual welding
'll inspection af ter that date was performed to the critoria contained in VWAC Rovision 2.
Clarifications to and deviations,
r from portions of AWS D1.1 (and-VNAC-Revt31on-2 Para made based on engincoring evaluatio,ns.
l
\\
D.3.3.3 Fabrication The fabrication of structural steel conformed to AISC
" Specification for the Design, Fabrication and Erection of Structural Stool for Buildings," 1969 or 1978.
I I
h 6
6 T
(-
1 1>
.i D 3-2
- F 92 y
...~..
?E 4