TXX-6272, Responds to 870205 Request for Addl Info Re Insp Repts 50-445/85-07,50-446/85-05,50-445/85-14,50-446/85-11, 50-445/85-16,50-446/85-13,50-445/86-06 & 50-446/86-04
| ML20210G298 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak |
| Issue date: | 02/10/1987 |
| From: | Counsil W TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| TXX-6272, NUDOCS 8702110255 | |
| Download: ML20210G298 (39) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:. E Log # TXX-6272 P9 File # 10130 1RIELECTRIC Milliam G. Coumil noma,n,m a. February 10, 1987 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 s
SUBJECT:
COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES) DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 l REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING INSPECTION REPORTS: 50-445/85-07, 50-446/85-05; 50-445/85-14, 50-446/85-11; 50-445/85-16, 50-446/85-13; 50-445/86-06, 50-446/86-04 Gentlemen: We have reviewed your letter dated February 5,1987, requesting additional information on the subject inspection reports. We hereby respond to the request for additional information in the attachment to this letter. Very truly yours, 1 l W. G. Counsil l r By: G. S. Keeley m / Manager,Nuclearycensing RSB:lw Attachment Enclosures c - Mr. E. H. Johnson, Region IV l Mr. D. L. Kelley, RI - Region IV Mr. H. S. Phillips, RI - Region IV h / & 400 N rth Olive Street Lil. Ml Dallas,leus 75201 00702110255 870210 PDR ADOCK 05000445 Q PDR
L Attachment to TXX-6272 February 10, 1987 Page 1 of 5 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING INSPECTION REPORTS 50-445/85-07, 50-446/85-05; 50-445/85-14, 50-446/85-11; 50-445/85-16, 50-446/85-13; 50-445/86-06, 50-446/86-04 1. Provide TU Electric's evaluations and, as appropriate, proposed or corrective actions (including procedures generated) to unresolved items or open items addressed in inspection reports 50-445/85-07,50-446/85-05; 50-445/85-14, 50-446/85-11; 50-445/85-16, 50-446/85-13; 50-445/86-06, 50-446/86-04. RESPONSE TO ITEM 1 Based on discussions with the NRC staff on February 9, 1987, TU Electric will respond to this question by Thursday, February 12, 1987. 2. With reference to inspection report 50-445/85-07,50-446/85-05, unresolved item 446/8505-06, when Westinghouse accepted the deviation in tolerance for centering and leveling of the Unit 2 reactor vessel from their recommended design criteria, did Westinghouse perform an engineering evaluation (e.g., to confirm the stress report is still valid)? Did TV Electric review the Westinghouse engineering evaluation? Please provide the engineering evaluation. RESPONSE TO ITEM 2 At the time of the inspection finding (1985), no evaluation by Westinghouse was available which substantiated acceptance of the tolerance l deviation on the 1979 construction operational traveler. However, as a l result of the inspection item, Westinghouse, the NSSS design organization, documented acceptance of the tolerance by letter WPT-8148, dated January 10, 1986. Westinghouse has recently indicated an evaluation exists for accepting the tolerances; however, the evaluation has not been received at the jobsite. Westinghouse has also indicated that the final as-built stress reports (which will incorporate deviations encountered during the l construction phase) will be issued after completion of construction. Currently, only design stress reports have been issued by Westinghouse. i 1
J
v s Attachment to TXX-6272 February 10, 1987 Page 2 of 5 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING INSPECTION REPORTS 50-445/85-07, 50-446/85-05; 50-445/85-14, 50-446/85-11; 50-445/85-16, 50-446/85-13; 50-445/86-06, 50-446/86 CONT'D 3. With reference to inspection report 50-445/85-07,50-446/85-05, unresolved item 446/8505-07, does TV Electric audit plan require an audit be performed of surveillances of the Unit 2 reactor pressure vessel specifications, procedures, and installations? i RESPONSE TO ITEM 3 1 TU Electric's audit plan did not and does not require an audit of s surveillances of the Unit 2 reactor pressure vessel specifications, procedures, and installations. The objective of the TU Electric audit plan is to determine that a quality assurance program has been developed and documented in accordance with specified requirements. TV Electric accomplishes that objective by performing audits on selected activities, not on all activities. 4. With reference to inspection report 50-445/85-07,500-446/85-05, and NOV 445/8507-04,446/8505-02, although no records exist that concrete mixing blades had been inspected quarterly since trucks were placed in service in 1977, it is our understanding that there are consistent concrete strength and uniformity tests. a. Does TU Electric have a concrete strength statistical distribution for this period? b. Provide three (3) results reports spaced over this period (i.e., 1977, 1980 and 1984). RESPONSE TO ITEM 4.a is a statistical evaluation of a series of concrete tests run during 1978. This is one of several statistical evaluations run during the 1978 to 1979 time frame. RESPONSE TO ITEM 4.b Enclosures 2, 3 and 4 are sample strength tests run during this period. is a sample uniformity test. Uniformity tests were run and documented during the 1977 to 1979 time frame, and strength tests were run and documented during the entire 1977 to 1984 time frame.
Attachment to TXX-6272 February 10, 1987 Page 3 of 5 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING INSPECTION REPORTS 50-445/85-07, 50-446/85-05; 50-445/85-14, 50-446/85-11; 50-445/85-16, 50-446/85-13; 50-445/86-06, 50-446/86 CONT'D 5. What are the marking and traceability requirements for pipe spools and weld-rods? With regard to weld rods, what are the consequences of using an unidentified weld rod to perform welding? RESPONSE TO ITEM 5 9 MARKING AND TRACEABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PIPE SPOOLS: The site marking and traceability requirements of pipe spools in the ASME o Code Section III, Division I, Subsection NA, Paragraph NA-4442.1 and NA-3776.6(a) are identified within CP-CPM-6.9, General Piping Procedure, as specified by Specification MS-100, Piping Specification for Nuclear [ Piping. CP-CPM-6.9, General Piping Procedure, states, "This procedure and the appendices have been prepared to delineate requirements for the fabrication, installation, B0P inspection, and the documentation for piping..." CP-CPM-6.9, Appendix C, Material Identification, contains the requirements for the ~ control and identification of components and material using unique markings, color coding, etc. It outlines the material identification procedure, QC receipt inspection of materials and color coding and tagging of material by warehouse personnel. It also requires that the color code be. maintained until the pipe and/or fitting is fabricated into, or becomes a pipe spool. This appendix also requires that material requisition documentation should contain: a) Piping Materials - quantity, description, heat no., pipe category, specification, color code or stock no., code class, or for field use, the applicable drawing (s) for which the material is to be used, b) Piping Subassemblies - subassembly number... and, d) Valves - quantity, size, generic no., serial no. and drawing (s) on which valve (s) are shown... f) In addition to the above information, the applicable heat / log / serial number and code class shall be marked on the Material Requisition form adjacent to the appropriate item for all "Q" material... " CP-CPM-6.9, Appendix D, Welding and Related Processes, requires that QCI verify items or material to b: installed or used in fabrication be accepted for construction activities or other wise released. This appendix also identifies controls for material traceability control, marking transfers and prefabrication checks for proper markings. CP-CPM-6.9, Appendix E, Pipe Fabrication and Installation, delineates the requirements for piping fabrication and installation at CPSES. It
Attachment to TXX-6272 . February 10, 1987 Page 4 of 5 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING INSPECTION-REPORTS 50-445/85-07, 50-446/85-05; 50-445/85-14, 50-446/85-11; 50-445/85-16, 50-446/85-13; 50-445/86-06, 50-446/86 CONT'D specifies such elements as marking technique and requirements, QC verification and marking location. Specifically, the procedure requires, "Each spool shall be identified where practical by a name tag attached by banding and in addition, in all cases, by marking the spool number into ' the spool approximately 4 inches from the upstream field weld end." The procedure also provides marking requirements for piping prior to cutting for fabrication as follows: "Q" Pipe Heat number, piece number, spool number, ASME grade number and schedule. The procedure also states, " Care should be used when marking short pieces of pipe to ensure the markings are not inadvertently removed during the cleaning / fabrication process prior to being recorded on the weld documentatica." 1 CP-CPM-6.9, Appendix G, Documentation for ASME Welding, Fabrication, and Installation Activities, provides the documentation requirements of ASME Section III for welding, fabrication, and installation activities. It describes the requirements for using Weld Data Cards, Multiple Weld Data Cards and Manufacturing Records Sheets. These records ensure traceability of material through onsite fabrication to final installation and documentation transmittal for review approval, certification and records vault for retention. MARKING AND TRACEABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR WELD RODS: 4. i The site marking and traceability requirements for weld rods specified in the ASME Code Section III, Division I, Subsection NA, Paragraphs NA-4442.1 and NA-3766.6(b), are identified within CP-CPM-6.9, General Piping l Procedure. CP-CPM-6.9, Appendix B, Weld Filler Material, delineates requirements for the procurement and control of all welding filler material. It includes i_ controls for procurement, identification, material distribution and storage, prevention of contamination during handling, and issuance control. The procedure is specific in requirements for identification of weld filler material that is removed from its original container: .. 2) Each 18-inch length of straight bare wire shall be flag tagged on one end. Each 36-inch length of straight bare wire shall be flag tagged on both ends. Marking shall include the material classification, heat / lot, and size. I 3) Low hydrogen electrodes shall be segregated to maintain traceability by the classification, size, and heat / lot number when l placed in a heated stationary or portable oven..." . _., _.,, - _ _ _ _ _, _ _..,. _ _ -,, ~,..., r
m Attachment to TXX-6272 February 10, 1987 Page 5 of 5 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING INSPECTION REPORTS 50-445/85-07, 50-446/85-05; 50-445/85-14, 50-446/85-11; 50-445/85-16, 50-446/85-13; 50-445/86-06, 50-446/86 CONT'D The procedure gives requirements for the completion of the Weld Filler Material Log (WFML) as to Weld Procedure Specification (WPS), material size and class, welder's symbol, date and weld numbers, entry of the heat number and quantity of material issued and current revision /ICN number to the WPS. The return of weld filler material to the Material Distribution Station (MDS) shall be dispositioned as follows: ".. 2) Straight-length bare wire - a) Material not used may be reissued b) Used material shall be considered NCWFM [ Nonconforming WFM] c) Flag tag identification must be affixed to all reissued bare wire. Flag tagging shall not be done if material traceability is unclear. Material returned without the original flag tag shall be handled as NCWFM... 4) Low-hydrogen electrodes - a) Material issued in portable oven that was energized (no notation on WFML). Return to stationary oven, reissue as required. b) Material issued in portable oven discovered not energized and has exceeded exposure limits (notation on WFML) disposition as NCWFM, store for transit to WQTC [ Welder Qualification Training Center].
- 5) Other covered electrodes -
Identify and protect, reissue as required...." CONSEQUENCES OF USING UNIDENTIFIED WELD RODS: Unidentified weld rod is required to be treated as nonconforming and documented on Nonconformance Reports using CP-CPM-6.9, Appendix B. If the weld rod could not positively be identified, the subject weld joint l would be removed and replaced. l l If the identification of the weld rod could be established using l supplemental documentation, the subject weld could be accepted "as-is" contingent on approval of Engineering and QA/QC. This approval use would include appropriate technical justification for acceptance.
.cu cuoson e n Pa ge i or iq CONCRETE TESTING DRTR MANRGEMENT W~ / l REVISION A l l RUN DATE: 03-15-79 PROJECT: COMANCHE.PER_M Jos nunata 35-1195 CONCRETE ntxt R-132 7 onY TEsis To 12-29-78 to day TESTS to: 12-29-78 .-am-77/// X XX% / ///I \\T 1 1 TT \\ \\ 1 \\ t/
- i/>
W V I- - -,,,_ v A t / --x BROWN & ROOT. INC. POWER ENGINEERING DIVISION HOUSTON. TEXRS FORNOREM M
- ~:~ '2W~
s- ~ ~ ~
l[ l{Il ( l:I tlllll1 1 I EosE72 Jo,P " o d l 4 1 42 F 1 P o C d T G 0 ED 1P l ( S hE S R J*- U 5 T 1 A 3 R 0 E e P d M E T E A T D N E UR E RR odEH BT l MUS NU 2 O 3 TI 1 0 SV 4 R EE TR s P X IM F O E 0 T 3 E E RC G N R 3t PE l V o R d G N I KA V E n P o M f EH C emno ~ c [ b 8.om Oo g o" wMpDTMUrw 8 S 85* o98 =- E,:. a e =.d 32 u G A s e ll} j' l' l >,l l
J l ~~ 1 ,m aR \\ e c$ l 1cosenucue ress ]comentre nixs n-1st nui entee on-1s-1s Pt.or a L tl E L 8 cr-244 e i 8 g-I g. g-ha ~3f-r s 40 g, i =sE -jui l 1 = I d le do do Jo do de h do A e TEST NUMBER MOVING RVERAGE OF PREVIOUS THREE SLUMPS CIN.)
escwsone t Page, 4 of 19 n m 4 N m e D n m n e. g N a .n a y ( Y ZW v.s t z e* O U a =w w g 'ui u a 2 w a" w 4Wh =~ EDe Ep a C C hm o i -, m > s .ww pg f. A W o M W I 8 E l 0 =w m-c o Z w .i o w' o 2E w h fi, i m r - 1-CC'$ 00'S 00't 00't 00'3 00't 00'O IN31NO3 8IW fORNORM10!IMY
$ PJ CL.OSO P,E I Page s or 17 o 1 to rb 4 o h' P.* I ? Ee E N 7 w 0 W b ,a. 'e ILI u 3 5 P- = 4Nh ~~ mEL 30 Z am 2 A~ws He M w E Ee u
- s 4>
L Yv p t g W a ~ m u [h m LL I. w c t 4U je Y. ( L.- C0'C 0S'E 00*t og t 00't 02'O 00'0 A 30 3 ggg W O W W
taccesuae i Page (o o9 19 l ^* .;g i- .t = e l4 =l e s m ,o. ' 4. 3 b ~ 'l g' O" l-gl x g g i i. z = w $l Ia8 o g +r i wI e 'l c,,, l w if I I 4Ew l e r a z l o EO ~ oow I ex EE mo l 2 c. es l wn o e = -, W I l +1 5 s e a I c l w U 4s e,, I =w U H E S3 o l m> o 4 g y 4- ? gggguGROH.T is 00' dt. oc de 00 de 00 0 00 ds 00'0$ 0lm H10N3819 i 3 i
EN ct osv Rg g j Pog< "I oF 19 g l ~ I zl e l a'4 g. e f-o 0., 2y g m mi 1 i. 5 H" O i 1 -e Z l.n W I z !, [' ' M l t.II >C l -E C 'l ui c- 'I w l m S"w5 I mc nDm 2m r* o C bw owW> Ww Hg G. j L un o ,5 Wo /. g - u x W. a E t m c z t' t c
- i. 6 l
ik 9gggghTiGHON 00' O'L 00'0'9 00' S 00'09 00*ds 00'0 I 0* W10N381S 3
EMcLosoR E 1 Page 8 of 19 t sh l I W I l e l b in'- 3 e. v> A w a t1 M' o q w r. 5 A M o n G 'w o M 8 c-aE M 2 n5 tis w ?!- r. M us '4D Nes O n,'(Q p ~~ sus i d 1 / l L'3W
- rc M
/ A E / L y C' O .n sm w m W i 0 ) l E u cc I W E l i 0 \\ l m I I N . '. ' E i E., f. Ea:nu ~ r~~..,'. t. 00'0dt 00 de 00*dj,pg.p, gg,; p l 1 .__....m...
i 7E i wp C R ICopWNCHE PEAK I CONCRETE NIXs A-132 RUN DATEe 03-15-15 PLOT 9 ec o 1 o i I oa CP-244 "m i 4 .o - 8 I E N o LL I om 0 l wee cj:s-Y --A \\ ~ j m I ci L l %E I d 50 30 $0 40 50 do - 30 d0 50 i TEST NUNBER WITHIN TEST COEFFICIENT OF VRRIRTION. ? ORY (%)
Eractosons t Pqe io og i3 4 5 b 4 S 5
- G Y
A c 5c G 4 E a E z O a: 4WU .ea r-s a: ze g 4> 4 s agm e M M 2 y W W w Q 4 u.. E u 8 g p u 4 a I JG* 11 w w 4C 1 E 3
- n. em u a
qqqmngipFn ' rs o co t's oo it ao dt co e A.d0 3
4 Euct.oson.C l Pogo.11 oF 19 4 l dl M
- 9 4
S b = e [ z 5 3 al 5 8
- 5 9
l = Ts I y I 45 s w s m EC OhU l = >. = g=o B 4 I 4M." wi l We H I d e = C w U MW i = i w H 4 =c 8 5 i u i t i E Ia h ggg 0, poi co'ds 00 dL 00 de co-{s co cv 0" H 6 3
3? es [conamenEPERE lCONCREWMIN: A-132 l RUN BRTEs 05-15 '70 lPLST 12 l -{ CP-244 2m .n - 8 f, 8 g- "o8 3~ r. 1=.1 uoo I WO 21 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._=n.La_tramers__ _ $ g-i l as 8 k-8 O G8 8 M6 d"o lo da do Je do do io da de TEST NUMBER NOVING RVERAGE OF PREVIOUS THREE 28 DAY STRENGTHS (PSI)
,m 19 W la s g$ r cancnere nrx a-tse num ents os-ts-w roer is comucne reau CP-244 3 8 h 8 k-i 8 - j-a m l l ar c= E es iMi d io do do Jo do do-do do o TEST-NuttBER MnVTNn AVFRAfE OF PREV 10US -TEN, 28_.. DRY RANGE (PSI)
i? 5P O ' I 'd g CSMANCHE PERK CONCRETE MIXs A-132 Rutt 13 RTE OS-16 Je - l PLOT - 14 CP-244 g'_, 8 d-E e >o La 9 o. u !!B 8 =a A x: --
- g A8 g:
3 .=n A o9 fa da do do - do do io do - do TEST -NUMBER WITHIN TEST COEFFICIENT OF VARIRTION. 28 DAY (%)
FF 8% G$ g g. c cnn mx. .-in I
== an. ms-w neg5 ) g5
- ~
8 l I l E i >o ta 9 j om j 'J "s a asus g- !EE "o a"Q 8 C 4 o = - - - E ca iE w a. a6 {o do de Je do do - k do do i TEST NUMBER l OVERALL COEFFICIENT-OF VARIATION. 28_ DR.Y ( % )
~om D 2. ... - - ~.. -... _. _.-.. - -. ~. ..t P Q O O e -V CC - ny _... CLIENT seAME -1 ERAS UTILITIES SERVICES INC. mm ?
- LOCATIJN
-6LEtt 805E. TEAAS g-r
- PLANT WAME -CorAI4CnE PE AR NUCLE AR PROJt.CT I
g, g - - = - - '~ I e
- BROWN AIAD 9001 JOS NUp*0ER 1195 I
. CA Cut.4T!cNS HV - 6MME PolNTER l i l I .j._. I .. ~ -- l 1 CONCRETE TEST. DATA M6T. ~-~ -' -~ ~ - ^ - -
- * - ' ~ ~
~ ~ ~ - i...... _ _ _.. _. CP.244 #Ev!SION A IBM 3TO.155/868 i J/IS/79 i T1HE.13:48 31 ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ' -' '~ " - " - i ---... g gg, l. 1 CALCULATION NJMBER REVE51DN NUWRR l l _ _... I-LV) or FIRST ANALYSIS F04 eigx A.120 SECutsu ANALYSIS FOR MIX A-128 l ~ Lew OF t ti!5T A*aALYSIS F02 M1 A A-132 7 St. Coho ArsALYSTS FoH seta A-132 -~ ~~ * ~. SECOe49 ANALYSIS F Ud MI A A-1.13 4 I d ml; wt]Ge T et.01% t.OT CzEtolEO AS A RESULT OF ONLY ONE TAKEN PER DAY l C3 -f uaTE l, AbECALd sv AMae83)F.4 8= y gJATL CM%svtD sv ht.10 1
E ncusont. t f Page_ J r of 19 e e e e. e. i. i I.>,. n. 1 l g !. F.,.
- 1..< e l o. o l,, l e,~.
.ol o~14..I,..Inool~~ l.-n...-
- ,d:,":.
o W. . u.... l
- e.....
~.. I ~. o. ~..... n. o. =.. ~. ~..o e.,,. ~ n n e ~ e. - = n. ~,, n i ~. n. ~ n. n. ~ ~,.. n..... . ~....n t h.x. h.. 2 . ~ n e. ~ m,..,. ..-,.Bs..... w .o. . n. ~ ~ ~. -. ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . ~. ~ ~. ~ l I I l g g. i !...l....l. l' o. l. .l o..
- W}.:2.:
.n~~.
- ~
~..,.... n m =....#.x h.-- n. i ~n ~~ Ino no.~ . n. ~ n- -- l . l. ~ .~ l 2 l l. l l I I I ..................................I.. c.. 1... e. ,4. W -. o, -.. . ~.C m 2 . d o e t. ~ ~.,. A.,n....,n...,,..... .n. 3 n e l. o,o, . o... e,,....... I.....,.I c.n.n. n ~. ~, c o..n.r 3 1 - n,.,. .~~. .- ~.n- .<t.> .n.n. to~o .#oo.n~ 1 .nr.~ . n... n .<e o mo.no .o n ><.om m. 5W l 1 .I I l l. l ....fn I l I I. I. i i l I.,n J,... .. l. e... l...
- 3..
........ ~.,,.. e. ~n I A;8 . n., .., ~. no I.~n .~
- l. w.,.
. ~ n. $ e., . e,n we I.~m.$n .no . ~. sa G u s. !me .o, e see wo .wm me o
- s. w e
.oo ..w I i. .I .I .i u
== s ...A w s s. ..m,X.. e .. ~. !. n, .->t#~e ...~,,o,. ~~~ ~ c,, i. .. n - . e. + > s. > s.. o... - >= - u n ! ~ ~ c 1 af. ~.., . ~
- n.... o. n...,o. n. l. ~. a.....n.
. !.. o.. ~ ~
- n. e.
ao.bz w ~.u,...tm..o.um..l~I . ~ o - o. l ~. ~ . ~ ~ I.~~.e ~em .o
- .~,o
-no ~.mm s o ~ ~ l o o. ~ ~. ~ .~i~g ~ ~ m ~ .I I -1 I l .i 1 d.:
- l. o..
- l. o.
- l. o..
8.e.. . < 4_. >.... 1... .. ~ ~, 1.#. ~.. n4 I. ~~ ~. ~ e e .. o. ..,, o ~ .n ~o .n .~. . - o. n 2 .~~ l >u. ..w.>=.fo - l l e a i g. I I g s I 'l bi I l 'l l l. l. 1 l . ~n e n I. - n,..!.,................ ..,,.,n...o~.........,............~ln~..... ~e I e.m 3.f o.f 22 Lo z. z. - oo W- . o,.n. ~ ~ l~, ~~ ..~ ~~ -.~.oon.n a n n n n n., n n 1 mJ ... n.-. n,...... -. ~,. ~.. 3.r f o e. ~ n nnn.nn .nn nn I,,, l l. I l l. n.. .o .w l l ~1 <a fn. ...l...I I I l 4 ca. o... ..,. l. o......,. , o o looo. .. o, o. o. n.o ..<d ~m eo...,.c o, +.n . ~ .#o ~ .on e n., c., n
- n. e. e.
.m . n,. n. ~- .-~ e,. .4 . ~, ~. .~= a s. s ..,n I ~,, n, .XX u-. ..n i n, nm .nn .nn .i n n., w. ~ w= v"o u l. l. l
- i..,
i..
- l. R.
1..
- l..,
1. l. o!..> .z 4
- i. n.
. n.. n. . c. o l I.n % a Ew-.. t l o.
- i. o
.o e .o .l. .8u l.., o l l. ..,, e.l.,..l ...,oIs ~..~ - ~-.,, 8 n. ~. -. n a. p 1.. o. i n.,..,,. ,1.,.....,...,........,...........,.,....,.,..,,.,. o 3 a w. e -. ~, n,. ...,...,.,...e.,...,..n,n,..,,,n,<,,,,..., .o, .,, n, ..z-.
- 4..,. !
...s E,o -- l-- 1 1 m. l m w l l e. m l... -. 2. t , r.,,, 1,.. o.. - e. e. l.,,. o... .m. 9 d. =. -.2... ,r., I,,.,..,,,.,
- e. o. n.., o. r. I,. o.,.. ~. r.,. u ~. o. ~.
- c.,o... o.
.n, < a. o ;..,.,. ~. ~. I..,.,. ,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,..n,,, i i .... e.:. ~w v.<v.r s .!c....i ! oo,...i....- u m. ., e. _ a.y . m- ,en. c- .n..o.e.l..,o~en n.,,.,.,. l,,.,i e., 3 a,,..L.,... .e
- d,.i. 3,. t.. - e.. o. t.
n n.,..,... n.,...n..n. . l..n. 2 d. 2 3. c.,. c.
- l.. y n.,.,.,.
..m -a n .sd. .go. l 2 l .<p, y.n 1 n:..,.... v .o,,c ..,e.,.,..,.. -,~..,.,~,.,,, -..,. a.t. 6 o,.. coo.#n.ou.43 er ~ ~. e - s, u. - u .e4 .e, ,e t..., .-et. 2 w l. .. e.,. .,.z. - o. ~. I,.=. o ~,.. ...e n .n -e ,~o.,. m. . n.,...,.- e.,,.. t r ~x., .<<..o~. a. ,.n~...~ lN I w .o n n n I n. r, . n n. o v..d. e. .I, n I w. 2 .l l i
4 %6
- 4..
_~ = 29 62. 2.50 4.4 tc5.4 0.5* 3400. 3470 130. 2.73 5064 5048. 40. 3:41 p'M( 121278 59. 3.57 4.7 144.5 3530. 3980 123. 273.39 ~~ 5028 5310. Ibc. 192.17 0 61. 3.33 4.9 144.4 e. 3630. 169. 6.86 9 - '5280 ~ ~ ~ 134 3.62 'W N' 3 h{ 0 g 30 S6. 2.25 S.e 145.4 0.5' 3750. 3620. 270. 2.85 4770 4930 32e. 3.10 1 1212/6 S r. J.52
- e.. I 144.5 34 ts c.
. 3970 128. 276.87 Se90. 5300 185. 200.80 C a 7J e 58 2.c3 4.a 144.9 6. 3570. 212. b.97 0 51J0. 149. 3.79 9 '9 i 31 62. 3.5e %2 0.0 0.5' 3o90. 3650 90. 2.83 S710 5570 29e. 3.15 '6- ~
- 121378 59 3.57
..F 144.'.s 3600. 3960. 126. 278.45 S429 SJue. Iss. 203.11 O-sv. 3.73 4.9 14%
- o.
35Ho. 420. F.03 c. 5180. 162. 3.83 3t 2. 3.00 4.2 146 4 0.6 3740. 3650. L80. 2.87 5500 5410. l#e. 3.14 12137e 59 3 51 4.7 144.n 3560. 395s. 12a. 279.39 5320 5310. 184. 280.80 ~ 0 6d. 2.92 4.a 145.6 v. 3b40 187. 7.0T 0 5360. 176. 3.78 33 5.t. 2.15 4.s 1*4.7 8.63 3d90. 3M80. 20. 2.80 5680 5620. 133. 3.11 1214to 59. J.*n 4.7 144.0 3470. 3950. 125. 275.40 5550. 5320. 186. 204.61 u el. 3.03 4.7 145.5 O. 3f30. 175. 6.97 0 553J. lat. 3.85 l ~. _... j 34 44. 3.2% 4.6 144.s c.54 3610 3%90. 50. 2.76 57eG. 5580. 440.
- 3. I'J i
121816 Sv. 3..a 4.7 144.h J560 39*0. 123. 278.24 5460. 5J3D. the. 206.41 er o1. 4.pn .5 14 % 2 c. 3710. 161. 7.06 0 5540. 189 3.44 ~......__ _... I 3b t.o. 3.2S 4.7 144.5 0.5# 3450 3404. 110. 2.76 5070. 5090. 30. 3.06 122. 288.84 5100. 5320. 183. 20F.33 121978 av. 3.47 4.7 844.6 3340. 3948. ~ 134. 7.36 e. 5430 174 3.93 ~ 0 f.3. 3.Gd 4.6 144.C 0. 3620. 34 3.34 %.2 0.0 0.5J 3570 3550. 50 2.72 5350. 5330. 50. 3.00 121978 %D. 3.47 a.7 144.6 3520. 3910. 120. 291.52 5300. 5320. 180. 204.44 o 65. 3.33 '.8 144.a C. 3510. 131. F.45 O. 5330 !bd. 3.84 37 69 3./5 ~.I p.0 0. 5'F 3370. 3430. 120. ' 2.73 5090 5150 110. 2.97 1219/r 60. ~ J.*7 4.F 144.o 3490. 3908. 120. 298.44 S200 5310 1T6 203.o1 o 6t. J.13 %c 144.d D. 3460. 104 F.64 8. 5190. 174. - 3.83 __ --=..........___.....~...___......=- 3h 66. 3.50-5.4 0.0 0.57 3/70. 3350. 160. 2.77 5470 5090 30. 2.91 1/191H AS. 3.41 4.7 144.h 3430. 3890. 121. 386.99 5100 5310. 114 284.22 0 M.. 3.4/ L2 0.e e. J44 0. 118 7.9e C. 5190 142. 3.85 ......._.......................... ~... 34a 42. 3.cn 43 14% u e.% 4030. 4020. 30 2.71 5760 5890 2b0. 2.93 201Fi 60. 3.46
- .7 14%.7 4000.
3b90. 119. 303.72 6020 5320 176 221.60 66. 3.25 4.9 145.0 0. 36bd. 108. 7.81 0 5370 164. - 4.16 b 0 4e 4/. 3.75 5.2 143.S 0.57 3820. 3800. 4e. 2.67 5540 5338 420. 3.04 i 26fA an. 3.4S .7 144.n 3780 38%. 117 300.22 5120 5340. 182. 21o.81 c h t. 3.2% bc 144.3 0. 3720. 85. 7.72 e.
- 5448, 174 4.1I d
3 41 bl.
- 1. 7%
%9 142.7 0.E2 3530. 3520. 30. 2.63 4999 4984 30. 2.94 27te 60. 3.46 4.re 144.S 350s. 38A0. 115. 302.03 4968 531e. 179. 222.69 et. 3,33 51 14J.o C. 3760. 79 7.79-C. - 5484 14a. 4 19 l % K __G g""3
- 't 64 1.25 41 0.0 0.e2 3760.
3690.
- 148, 2.64 5420 5510 170.
2.'a r o 3 2978 t,0. l.45
- .d 144.*>
362u. 3870. 115. 299.7s $590 5320. 1 13 221.94 - F p A2. 3.42 %1 143.1 e. %70. 75. 7.74 9. 52TO. 147 4.17 4 _... -....-. _ __. _ _. _.. _ - --v - - 4)
- s. 3.
3.lS 4.4 0.0 0.82 J$00. 3610. 10. 2.59 5849 5120. 250. 2.99 3 3223/H
- u.
s.4o 4.7 144.4 Jo1b. 3a10. 1I3 299.02 -S590. 53J0 180 227.32 o .. s. a. *. - 4.4 14t.1 0. %c 0. f4 l.73 0, 5400 tw. 4.2T
44 6,.. 4.Ce 0.7 00 6.62
- 3650, 36, 50.
2.56 5520 55202 14. . 93 122973 60. 3.47 0.7 144.5 370). 3860. 112. 296.96 5510. 5330. 175 226:44 i o 63. 3.67 4.4 e.0 e. 3660. 74. 7.69 8 5560. 136. 4.25 4 -,5m'. ~_-- 45 67 6.eJ 5.2 e.c 8.62 3480. 3*40. 90. 2.56 5370. 5260. 228. 2.95 D 7.
- ill It297ei 61.
J.o rs 4.5 144.S 339e. 3b50. 111. 300.35 5150 533e. 177. 224 16 '"@ p i o o4 3.92 4.6 e.0 d. 3570. 72. 7.s0 9 550s. 155. 4.21 o l 3M . - ~.... -... - -.... - 40 70. ' 3.25 4.6 0.0 c.62 3o80. 3690. 10. 2.51 5730 5600 27d. 2.98 h n I. 12207h s1. .s. 6 4.8 144.S '3670 %50. Is9 '298.e8 5464.---" 5340. ' - -- 179 - 225.04 - '-w 'l 1 0 ha. 3.75 ..e 0.4 c. 3600. ed. 7.7* 0 5460. 171 4.22 l . - - - - - -. - - - ~ ~. - -.. - ~. ~ _ .O~. .. -. -. ~ 1 s. t)t.5!G84 Slut. :Jt.Tres a.000. RL90! RED DVf R0tiSIG$ STHEse6Tp6= 4404. 1 1 j a I g l ] i s a e t I i l .i ._-.l... . ~.. O 1 .x3 ..M. ,g _M NE =:s i 8:3 .g l
- e..3 J
2 r-4 ..s
00btdQT U. HUr/7 COWANY ewcwsoes a {' p,, i 34 7 ......,,,,m.,2....,4, .,,......., m,.u.... g ~N'N Page Order 927 Date: Brown & Root, Inc. P.O. Box 1001 Cien Rose, Texas 76043
Subject:
Texas Utilities Services, Inc. Re: D & R/TUSI retention time Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station fog the attached documents 1980-1982 Units 1 & 2 //fefdje years af ter plant Job No. 35-1195 .begins operation. B & R Subcontrace No. 35-1195-0225 Hunt Project No. 513 Gentlemen: Please acknowledge receipt of the following item by signing and returning a copy of this letter.
- cPDhn
'To ahn coedsdon mf cw cowM cv&oces M /16 hwoJeare Mie hwthk Sout $ M2 - CB/D - ao/ RROWN & ROOT. INE ~ pgcs.. o=,n JUL 2919n FILES NoTed ROBERT W. HUNT COMPA!N h*# #[) [M "' QUALITY ASSURANCE k,A
- a. M
.,o. Title O U 6 g w mm Date 9 19 QA RECORD RouriNG '** I M arvr t r j*~ Form HCP-9 'L i (xQ"w , nu7 ni
- 2. -
WX2/ 3.- , svante uo, Iul-mo -on, j 4'- 5.- 7
bNC&ObU SQ } Fa e Q cf 7 i n s. si.. 3777-6 7-2k-7'[ ",.E y, f ..w e. w 13-C-9927 Dato: Bro.m & Root, Inc. RE: Texas Utilities Services, Inc. Comanche Pask Steam Electric Station P. o. Box 1001 Glen Roso, Texas 76043 1980-1982 Units 1 & 2 . Job No. 35-1195 B & R Subcontrace No. 35-1195-0225 Ilunt Project No. 513 Contlemen: We report results of Concreta Compression Tests, ASTM C-39 (llunc E1001) J4' Pour No. dd I-M /B- @ / Slump Inches Ticket No. 32887 Tamparature *F.' [ Date Mada 2'22-7 I Air Content % Y. /2d Data Tested ~29-77 Concrete Mix 7 Unit Weight /4 5 28 Age Days FIELD CURED (J05) STANDARD CURED N/A Y87[ 8487h N[A Cylinder No. N/A N/A Strencth lbs. PSI. JfSO M/ N/A N/A Max. Load - lbs. f782 _ _ /88(M 4/A N/A ho 9 Type of Fracture 7-23-77 f-28*27 N[A N[A Date Reeeived i 9/A Min 29.26 l 28.3f Area r Testad by: Respectfully submitted, l Checked by: Mc9 ROBERT W. IlUNT COMPANY ~. /_ ~.; R -fx. U M x..a-Form llCP-E1001 (Rev.11/76) HoucHr w.Must compANv, t
FAMLoSue.n 2 Pag e a c+ 7-EY ' 77 35% 927 Date: 3,m .. e.i Dro n & Root, Inc. RE: Texas Utilities Services, Inc. P. O. Box 1001 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Cicn Rosc, Texas 76043 1980-1982 Unics 1 & 2 . Job No. 35-1195 3 & R Subcontract No. 35-1195-0225 Ilunc Pro.icce No. 513 Genticmen: We report results of Concreta Compression Tests, ASTM C-39 (llunt E1001) d Pour No. M 2-88/#- M / Slump Inches Ticket No. 829/f Tamparature 'F.' f Y,8 2 Date !!ade 7-22-77 Air Content % M[ Date Tested 7*29-7'7 Concreta Mix _ _ _ k Unit Weight /458 Age Days FIEI,D CURED fJ08) STANDARD CURED _ Cylinder No. M844 ((fg[ N/A . M/g .Strencth lbs PSI. J43 3 err 49 N/A 4/A Max. Load - lbs. /dddtCO__ / M OC N/A N/A [,o N[A N/A e Type of Fracture 1 N[A N[A b28 7[ Date R_aceived [- P /9 i N[8 N[A ,[8.88 i f8,/7 Area y Tested by: Respectfuliy submitted. Checked by: ROBERT W. IIU!C Cot!?ANY w_L w e -_ 0 ' walt-Form IICP-E1001 (Rev.11/76) bN M 84 0 0 C l4 7 W. HUNT COMPANT.
f-WNGbOSotV g S O.? I eise, si.. 3777-6 g
- [' Y'/- 77 i.h
..w e. w 13-C-9927 Date: Bro.cn A Root, Inc. RE: Texas Utilitics Services, Inc. P. O. Dox 1001. Comanche Pask Stosm Electric Station Cicn Rosc. Texas 76043 1980-1982 Units 1 & 2 . Job No. 35-1195 B & R Subconcrset No. 35-1195-0225 Ilunt Project No. 513 Conticmen: 'lla report results of Concrete Compression Tests, ASTM C-39 (Itunc E1001) Pour No. 2 1 s5~8/D-08/ Slump Inches I Ticket No. 8296~9 Tamparature
- F.'
[O Y Data Mada 7 77 Mr content % _ /2[ Date Tasted 2 77 Concreta Mfx f UnitWeight/Y4._dM___ Age Days FIELD CURED COB) STANDARD CURED Cylinder No. Y399 [NOO _ _ N/A N/A Strength lbs. Psr. .5323 J194 N/A 4/A e x. toaa - 1ss. 9m 9/m d/* g/4 Bn Gla 9/A m e a vreceure Date Received 7*23-77 '/-18* 77 N[A N[A 28 2i Yh88 !b Area Tested by: Respectfully submitted, Checked by ROBERT W. Il0NT COMPANY ) FOR W M AT M ORY Form 11CP-E1001 (Rev.11/76) HoucHT W. HUNT COMPANY.
l, I 3CNRI.~hUl~~[ I.WsPC'y' q QC a ,,I.,,,,3 ......, c. u,..., J,,,. <,,, u......... Re rt File 3777-6 [-/f-77 Page Order 13-C-9927 Date: Brown & Root, Inc. P.O. Box 1001 Glen Rose, Texas 76043
Subject:
Texas' Utilities Services, Inc. Re B & R/TUSI retention time Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station foi the attached documents 1980-1982 Units 1 & 2 //[efdse_. years af ter plant Job No. 35-1195 .begins operation. B & R Subcontract No. 35-1195-0225 Hunt Project No. 513 Centlement Please acknowledge receipt of the following item by signing and returning a copy of this letter. h'tP% n8 %sm conossh) mt a comek cypoas OA10}F KTl* $1lV /// bA)f$Q@ OUL 002~ O/O-/3/9 hDV'Vii G MUOT. INC R PTT '=1 I AljC 2 9 1077 j i j FILES NOTED R BERT W. WE COM QU Y Aci9URANCE Rec. nc. l ': fW ...a e ^^: 1e [yg b W LJt Date g -Z,.fi -7f l OA RECORD RotmNG l ' 4TN. O I I. b Form HCP-9 2. Fft.f NO. _ CC Y 2 - 3. sueru No. 4, t o 2. 5 Gin - 04 1 y. --_________.m, s =
6NC.LOSORF9. Pqe G rA 7 i.we u 1-927 Date: 8-/9-77 ,[ HCI'M$ l Dro m & Root, Inc. RE: Texas Utilities Services. Inc. P. O. Box 1001 Comancho Pesh Steam Electric Station Glen Rose, Texas 76043 1980-1982 Un!cs 1 & 2 Job No. 35-1195 B & R Subcontract No. 35-1295-0225 Ilunt Pro.joct No. 513 Centlemen: We report results of Concreto Compression Tests, ASTH C-39 (llunt E1001) Pour No. 8C2 - 68/S-4/f Slump Inches _ /M Ticket No. '3J d' f 7 Temporature 'F'_ [f0 Date Made 7 '22 ~7~/ Air Content % M 1}} Coricrete Mix /// Date Tested
- -/f-7 7 Age Days
-- Unit Weight /9f/4 STANnARD CURED FIELD CURED (JOB) dWJff (~ 'f_3 JV Cylinder No. $#Y))4 $ ~ ')"))O Strength 1hs. PSI. CfGG C309 T 4/ 5 7 Sty *f] Ha>:. Load - lbs. /97006 ff/846 / f f TM /f T 986 Type of Fracture 8.cc hv 8n 8er V I f f Date Received 7~J$#77 7-13-77 9.// - 77 8' '//~ 7 7 //23 OS, /P Area //27 .N W d Respectfully submitted. Tested by: _ Checked by: ROBF.RT W. Il0!n COMPANY e ,a ,DQ -_=~ V I /A_P V Form 11CP-2:3 001 (Rev.11/76) 14 0 ll C l4 7 W. HUNT COMPANY,
W CLOS U C.E 'h. h e 7 o+ 7 3 .,,ur 11ct'#19NI i so. u. 3777-fi un ..w s.: u 13-C-9927 Date: I-/9-77 .,a Dro.en 6 Root, Inc. RE: Texas Ut111 tics Servicon, Inc. 1 P. O. Dox 1001 Comanche Pcah Steam Electric Station Glen Rose, Texas 76043 1980-1982 Units 1 & 2 . Job No. 35-1195 B & R Subcontract No. 35-1195-0225 Ilunt Pro. lect No. 513 j Centlemen: We report results of Concretc Compression Tests, ASTH C-39 (llunt E1001) Pour No. 60j - f//# - o /S Slump Inches 34 Ticket No. 3 f ffg Temporacure 'F.' (( # Date Made 7 -jf-M Air Content % M fl Data Tested f -/f'- 7 7 Codcreto Hix _ /// Age Days _ Unit Weight /+d5 ##, STANDARD CURED FIELD CURED (JOB) /4 Cylinder No. 6 97Jf_ (-9 194 ,,4-9797 s$ .Streneth ihs. PSI. f 374 f3/f 6/97 A/4 na>:. Load - 1bs. /C300m / G Soo /4(Occ g/.4 Type of Fracture 8er 8er 8 ef 4I r r r Date Received 7-23-77 7-23"77 8'-//_- 7 7 &A/ Aten ,ff 4'f ! // '30 // $f_. /d Tested by: /T Respectfully submitted, Checked by: ROBERT U. IlUNI COMPANY
- \\
m%.- . n i'Q 0 / M.Lc For:a llCI'-I:1U01 (Rey, 11/76) [h M te o ll C 14 Y W. H u tJ T COMPANY.
I W @t'ti 6 g .4 " J -/0 .R CoedANCHE ptAM STEAM (f,ECTRic STAON n NO "AFP 7M;n - op 4 g O/, ..p(f YL.stT No- - M7 ,, g \\ e.LU .MO w moist r a. N,o r a. ca' ! u,o e A. total.ATs.es. Tea Tv.c o, cu.,N. c o,,,,, para as n. % Los _ q qq Les (L M Las, 3 'lti, Les 14 3 % Las bW APattacLE SPtclFIED ofs194 STRENGTH TOTat a[ E reou SATcH cguth? / cu 10. Ngo a00to H o/CEutNT maTio asR Cu 0, 2 t oz. $9 CZ M86 PSI m2[ Oavs LCM LOS (% gal. . Q.*aM., 4C unaNo of CtesNT TYPE or W WENT OmeND oF AIR ENTR.WeluG ADWiXTURE BRAmo or WATER Rt30clNG aceNETURE W29 C.A. Y Y A)b V A* A)$ 77 E U SOURCE C.A. SP. OR. C A. SOURCE F A. S8. OR. FA FWENESS M00VLES FA. $1. 0le boisR o740 $/-PA0}utix 2.&.2_ TTPE OP etXpel BATCH L040 TICNET No. SatAPLE TAWEN ATs UW9 OQAJ1' 3 /d c Y. met oo or. Lac,No B av., O securf =TE...tc0 aov. .<aTNER A.R TE conc. 7:= .Luu. f, _ O avee,es O enLr Q cavTs
- . g.jp,,o C )Q,&
9(f' v g 3 *r 2 Tite oF islNeft AT UNIT WT. Cu. PT. Mix
- t. D.
9ptCleRN TAWEN SY 5ptOMEN CAST sy aam CENTRAL PLANT \\ h, min kh.h? LW Ita f f r_s A grijnbj })W80 A$h 0 b,8 __ cTLosoEn ta A wtasunto ave.on DATE ca*Pto Tiet caTE asax/ Loa 0 consuusssss CAP gr,7 g Tvst or tha :N
- N.
casato eT Ytsfro TEsTE0 Ls. STRENGTH yr areas ons. - n -ro awoo haac @ 0 Se $iY loir s-1-to f tr1rA 1 06S8 .s-in -n ew A240 k bh b& fr17A 7 Y$h (d// /-7-fo b /r11e D WT C 014 2 1S'S 0 6'08 t-4-ro 149500 S 73 0 & dr S Y 0 G190 1-+ fa II, Moo GhSD N LE $ Ir17D R$$N~' boi2 v kN /c 0 35' I2-25'SO 0800 os e iunoo S/60 h O We rr174 E wss" 3 + n kroco N960 0 /s"17f 9 ?$' 4 ora 2SS h l g y omic a Time sTairezo REuaRus g %y PERM. PLT. RECORD wtrC -; ms 6cc. CURIN G CONTROL TEST RESULTS b - /"7 1. W,/ FOR 28 DAT BREAK
- w 9'? 'uC,,,,.
e n r a v.s. - u v r- ,q.,, *g fy - LasARATOPf CURED CTU N0ERf$1 FlELD CLRED cvuh0Ef45 5?b-TUC rCi staENGTN (e s il - f o) STRENGTH ( p s. t.) l T 6 TO 4$bU 1 b> id: MAR 10 % <ai.m - <ci.2_Eh ';.89 A SMo . toi.m a - i
- NOTE- (1).80VE ha,5 7 OE EGuaL 70 OR GAE TER THAN e ss; oR (2) A8ovt NEED j
1 it.. L-NOP EXCEED TME DE SIGN STRCNGTH BY WQRE THaN S0o PSI
- 1/1'.TY / s S -
Tae o.as caiTEaioN is NOT =cf. ,-7 - - O., e -,I h -.....i.N.,,. UO. C APPIN G MOLO NO L /3 / 25 Def PREPARED SY CHECMED 8Y
- )t ir ak t hainst r a m r* rtmana s h ? n at. ppt te Am et Tusco LAs sustRvison P08td ill-41 m
[EMc,Loggg,giNDATE J - 8 # C comAwcwt prax sTE.*.:s ELacTmc sTAnoN &Ar-w rz-m &' P0vR NO C / / g (al M0IST F. A. M 0 FA C A. H 0C A TOTAL wATEn/3ATCw TYet of Comtes g COMPJTE y [4 M DATA A8 [1 5t O Las L L(, Les i t. At ts tan 3 2 3, Les @D Les a M APPLICAR.E 20 ADDED H o/CEastNT RAT 10 A.4 CW.Y. TOTAL 4 setCiflED DEsl4N STRENGTH 3 FRObs SAT (H CfMENT / CU YD. M g b I RS LI*- Ib GAL . %.4 % $ 4 CI $ 4 01 h PSI M DAri g passa y y TYPt & MMENT SRANO OF Alm ENTWAlls4NG ADesiMTURE DRAND of WATER REDUC)fs0 A0te4MTURE tsAN sgC A. E GH ~~2C~ 1h& L/L //A yr SOURCE F A SP. GA. F A. FWENES$ N00ulf3 FA. SOURCE C A. $# 04 C. A. W/ bl. $on.e
- 2. S.2-3W 5 AX /- 0)eIowe J. & 0 A) 0Fasix EB RATCM LOAD TICKET NC.
S&MPLE TAMEN AT: 7 7 O ""m' "'"c" D 'o""* 'o'"Y " o'ec"'**c 90o/ //6 e T. .typjt b l ETN00 Or.LACase 7,um, O event DATc SA tED .soum .EATwo. Aim TsisR. COuC.Tsw.. neuis [ O euesite O.ELT O CauTE .p.f. ya w% gj.f o gyl r /// r y 714E OF IflEps0 AT UNIT WT. CU. FT. Mix t o. SPECtedEN TAstEN SY sptQastN CA$T 9f AIR ENTRAL 9LANT ))b L** l0$$ TQMu 91]De0 h f$ tlW b3 0 \\Y'L, uiN. I cvLissosa to estatern avin raA DATE CWgg Tiut DATE 4eAX/ LOAD C0es4Eguve " "' g-TM y W DiA. iN in. CA M O ev 7tsTED 7tsfte Ls. cTReassTH suman h.#$' (0JJ F No f 0foo.t. /.Gn Vuoo SOTO bb $ bw fry /A 1 4 f b962 3 11 ro v sees 30 60 hh b0 h x19A 7 hh (off J 10 /nre 49 EN' l.000 '3.20 N OL MS 2-+ n IS%00 SS30 h (0 $ S EttD 5.Y (a018 v2W 0 Obd8 1-+ n 158000 5%O [ 0 W _w inst 2f ?N L. cal 22W N 06 6 3 -+ ro %ooo UBSD N { NNt_ L otf 24W N O'T50 3 4R N3t.oco 4190 (o 0 N intf M N_ W l _ g he ~ STnig REasARMS DATE & TetsE _f.4 -/O OW. W CURING c0NTROL TEST RESULTS FOR 28 DAY BREAK LASARATORY CURED CYLINDERfS: FIEL3 cv4E0 CYLmDEum STRENGTM ( * $ t.) U30 (C) STAENGTM (P S l} _ IO) 4Mo , bi InD ,a3 U bM m8 'H 8 2 (Q) + (b) + 2 = __ i t (Q)+(D) * (C)+tdis hb
- NOTE- (IJ.4 pow E Most SE EQUAL 70 C4 GREATER THAN 0.85, NOT EXCEE0 TME DESIGN STRENGTH BY MomE THAN EVEN TMOUGM THE O SS CRITERION is NOT WET.
ns neo W [ I M -O - 4E..,0, - N. n.. C APPIN 3 es0LC No L8Ja (10'2 Es MY PREPARED BY CsetCut0 SY v s l br aiam r ua.a.s ra m c ~~ = ts ny as .r - ri 4 TueC0 LAs SW8ERW190R fl0 md 11.1 41 ~
co A= Cwt Rta= site s stecTRic station 002-9f5'2 093 6 OAT ~ F /#-#r coR-9952- 03/ 8
- "* fyY "noctwRt gyt,,rtgsg cyc,Reie 109-9 778- 0s/,0 S.2 nuoRr on L
(o u0iST ra n,0 r A CA u,0CA 70 tat wAttR/sATC= TypeorCURm) my^ SY&om o as Hs f a$ d,DI" 4tsoas ist aS NGTH TOTALhS*tCIFit0 DESdON8S pagg g ,EWEwf / CU YD Ngo A00E0 go/ CEMENT RAfl0 A.R Co. Y ,566 MI Vd# ,,1
- 7 0
3/S7 a5 DAYS to MApel 0F M)ENT TYWE Gr QWENT BRAND OF AWt ENTRAINING ADuirtuet 94AND OF WATER REQUCING A0 MIXTURE ualt ai21 C A. G-H '2T MsVL Al# .W __ SOURCE C.A SP. 04. C A. SOURCE F.A. SP. 64 rA FwtNESS u0outKS rA. I Tv-To d Top J2.4T Tu o -Tos,I no A. 63_ a?s2. dT Q,..C.,A TYPE 0*1110(186 SATCH LOAD TICKE7 WO. $4MPLE TAlltN ATs pga g ,, 43fy9 o C TR i R o,- I 0F PLACINo o aum)e ovatrT oart SA Lco woum CAT cii Aim TEve. co C. 7:= sw utTH00 3//.,,, O munie O ULT Gr C 97: y.g.py jggd 6,p
- rp r 4,(/
Tale OF bdIE9st AT UNIT WT. CU. r7. WIN t0 SPECitdEN TAKEN 87 SptCenstN CAST 57 AfR A f W 4 tu B2. Asermu 00- La-J us S. I s %$5& w. 9 tota 90 RED AVG.DA DATE CAPPCD Tiut 0 ATE Max. LOAD CC. _.- $k" T1pt 0F CT(se0ER LD g DA sN IN CA81 BED BY TEST _tD TESTED Ls. STREse4TH yy WIEAf( y ?},V u.wsl s-m d Q om s-2s-&rceo noso (k de Ku l=acA W&s a wxt P mn s-as-u n.tcoo sn ro ela d.t d a, du & AX Gesc 1t V& t.<*t O n O rom i,-is-e m m czuo p Mqq b.19 k%k 4.= a s-ir e 0 wln (,-IN4 scnoon c.t e o & WL Rd, mw g w
- i... i n,r n 6)
,o.,, s-a w oeo mo ak el ruL c, V' w d. t -awno mo du dx uL l xm 2 b%, 01 s. ann e l,a L i = DATE e flest ST Rs > RtuAnnS 5 */9* $ Y W Fu r O.l,OSOAt~4 CURING CONTROL TEST RESULTS gg lf Q FoR 28 OAT BREA= ritto CuRte C LAsARAfomy curio CruNotArSi 7 O to) O (C) STRENGTM ( P.S i l STRENGTH (PS I) f.2 f 0 ed, M 6 o,b3 kY0
- to).Ibn - (C)+(dl.
A iI 2 (0) f D)
- 2 =
- NOT E-(1) 6 E uuST St cQUAL 70 On GREATER TMAN O SS: 04 (2) ABOVE NEED NOT (XCEED THE DE SIGN STRENGTM BY WORE THAN 500 PSL EVEN THOUGH THC 0 05 CRITERl04 18 NOT WET.
$",0"'s " iso" TMIT.- f a9 2 gg **"' g cR CowmRa 5 siO4 mACMiNe No W f "E 8 1 - Y NO. _ U ObE'N b 38 Dev PREPAmt0 OY __ CMECNED Bf CAPPING WOLD -. a, _,., ~..,,,,, _,, n "a '- -v) i
@@2" kE8s1" OU C ) * ((*d I' COMANCHE P(A3 STEA3 ELECTRIC STATION OATE 002-9PSA 05/8 3sy-av II m /)y,1,N N,cyg /0V-9778-Of/.df.t M P9 ngPont on CTL. wT no - -/ moctouRe _ W J ~U (a) M0isT FA MoFA CA M 0C A TOTAL waftR44TCM TYWC 0* g 2 o! TIN" 8'//,Stos O tes //ff"tes Nia-6/f0tes /fD tes ^** F Qu CEMENT / Cu VD Mgo A00E0 H 0/CEutNT mAteo SPECIFIED DEsisN STMN0TM TOTALIMw .5,.2 P 0... ,3M 9.</I air Cu 2 vp T'c= " asf? L., o DuCae6 A0asinTumE Max Si2E C.A BLAND OF CEaENT TYPE & M utNT SAANO 0F AIR Esf7 RAINING ADuixTURE DRAND G-M .E tydebt' OFWATERN4 -9(v 90umCE CA SP. 04. C A. SouRCC F.A
- 58. GR. FA FINENESS WCDuL18 F A.
N /* D N O h he h$ [p(/ = hAl O O he b'S he $h J TTpE orammese savoeton0 flCKET NO. SAMPLt TAl(EN AT: 1 pgy q g-g3gysp a a T At ~~E. O re s V a \\ e,_ 1 l .ETN00 or me.. o u, o - 0 1E..~0 .R .c.T.E. 4,. TE CO,.C. TE... o.u.a. a.Ea We~rE s'-tt-ty ne& Rnra 74 r CV r 3 h ,N Tied 0F MtNW68 AT UNIT WT. CU. FT. MIX LD. $P(CIMEN TAstEN SY SPEOldEN CAST WY A4R 7d')$ ,N / # % tn !32. &ncmeco De-44-2WS SI* .E..u.E0 Av.. a. O.TE C. m 0 Ti E 04TE i .t0AD x-_= gg
- 7. O,
= CTu,,x.. C'1,'" TEsTE0 u sTc0 te.
- T=ENeT4 saEA.c Da.
i= cam 0 av NR ! _W A k I dA dd R@9G 9 E.M-. u.co' r v.H &) 3:cY s-1944 Sw*,719 o & (2 [k l 2V91W S' I 51&- 6.oo4 r.:H+ D 1[ s-23-tylwot M@ b Nw iip
- o:
2V992 /0 t-Af <,.oor r-z W W so sv *s-M-84l#rs c.oo W/O 9 P Oh
- 4. ;. 0 L m s-Ling h
4 Y Hs 95dM l OATE a Tauf sini p REmamsts S ll-fff 0 100 CameA C 4 u a O41t] A X k QstesT D EM* W-WE Ehd.i.0$O I CURING CONTROL TEST RESULTS FOR 20 DAY OREAK l LABARATORY CURED CYLINDERfs) FIELD CURE 0 CYLIN STRENGTH (P $ 1.) (C) STREN3TM ( P.$ 1 ) (0)
- d)
' bl L (0 )+ (b) * (C)+(d)s
- 2. (0)t(b)+ 2e N
- NOTE (lj@vf 14JST BE E0uaL 70 CR OREATER THAN 0 85: OR (2) A80VE peEED NOT EXCEED TMF DES,3N STRENGTH av MORC THAN s00 PSI EVEN T HOUGH TME O.86 CRITEAsON 13 NOT MET h @C -.
m 1 ~ raEaAu= < Co .s,0N CN,,,E. 4. ~, - 5~ CAeriwo wCLs No. ten o uo m_ g, p g,, p,gp,,g9,y of e,a= r cura s e-. n,,,,,,, m n f0R
- m.,
...m., .,,,...m MOLO$9 CF ous:n? W. HUNT COMPANY itsessamas ( cascana T. ie.uwei -. g 3 e l erf 3 3777-6
== M 7 b onese 13-C-9927 Date:
- a=
Brown & Root. Inc., P.O..Boi 1001 Clen Rose, Texas 76043 I
Subject:
Texas Utilities Services, Inc. .Re t 3*.& R/tUSI retention time Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station for the attached documents IM4-yeara after plant 1980-1982 Units 1 & 2 Job No. 35-1195 'begins operation. 3 & R Subcontract No. 35-1195-0225 - ' 4 /- 7-/#'74 .. Hunt.Froject No. 513 ... Gentlemen Please acknowledge, receipt of.the following item by signing and returning a copy of this letter. -i. t & } %21. *-__ UAlt fo @M.ff _ _b $_f_ Yttu t K $ sty ~ O l-l t --lROWN & ROOT *, INC I RECEIVED E B Jul.12194 I nt.ts NoTro g ROBERT W. HUNT CO.MPANY OUALITY ASSURANCE QA RECORD ROUTING Rec. by own & R te. I RTN. 'oA VIEW ~ l. f f 0 by lll l / lun 7pf 2.- ~ /> M su ILE o. 4' J-- ,2 /o Date ~ 5. %.1-m;. ( Form HCP-9
w.: - wt ia.s.scsco LoNac.M. INf.s. LOS ANcEtts M F i ROBERT W. HUNT COMPANY, ENGINESRS (N g} cuteAoo. Iz.:.txons n. w.. 3777-6 ....)[gpA ens. 13-C-9927 e... Y Brown & Root, Inc. Post Office Sox 1001 Glen Rose, Texas 76043 Attention: Mr. P. L. Buesolini Project Quality Assurance Manager
Subject:
References Texas Utilities Services, Inc. Comanche Peak Steam Electric Statio5 1980-1982 Unite 1 & 2 Job Number 1195 3 & R Subcontract Number 35-1195-0225 Hunt Project 513 Centlemens We report results of tests in accordance with requirements of ASTM: C94-73a Appendix XI Concrete Unifonnity Requirements made on the following equipment - l l Ready Mix Truck # RET 01 Weight per cubic foot (air-free basis) Sample #1 = 153.32 lb/cu. ft. Sample #2 = 153.91 lb/cu. ft. Difference in results = 0,59 lb/cu. ft. Maximum Permissible difference in results = /.60 lb/cu ft. Air Content, Volume % of Concrete l Sample #1 a 4.2% Sample #2 = 4.5% Difference in results = 0.3% Maximum Permissible difference in results = 1.0% FOR WOWAil0ll OllLY
T 3777-6 6 DS M E naron j/c (' jyf A6 ms no. omo no
- tgS-
'Pq e 3 d 1 ~1nches Sample #2 = Sh inches Difference in results = 1h inches Maximum permissible difference in results = 1.5 inches Coarse Aggmgate content, portion by weight of each sample retained on No. 4 sieve, percent-Sample #1 = 63.675 Sample #2 = 65.705 Difference in results = 2.03% Maximum permissible difference in results = 6.00% Average compressive strength at 7 days for each sample, based on average strength of all comparative test specimens, percent. Sample #1 = 102.49% Sanple #2 = 97.50% Difference in results = 4.99% Maximum permissible difference in results = 7.5% The above results comply with project requirenents. Respectfully submitted, ERT W. HUNT COMPANY n K. Kinkade L el III BKK/pw e M. J'?>
- dkd:
. M i *- I nomenT w. H UNT COMPANY. ENGINEER $ @ ENsW .}}