Search results

l. O Enclosure Comments on 10 CFR 50.55(a) Proposed Rule," Industry Codes and Standards" The NRC is proposing to amend 10 CFR 50.55(a), which defines the

are to be provided to the NRC. In addition, there are elements of the proposed rule that are contrary to the guidance in NUREG-1022, Revision 1. While miemaking

Oms 3m) 20 ATTENTION Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff Comments on Proposed Rule " Codes and Standards;IEEE National Consensus Standard" (62 Federal Recistst

available to safely decommission the nation's nuclear power plants. Any rule proposed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to assure funding in the event

Specifically, (i) the proposed rule does not provide a procedure i for the designation of the " Cognizant Security Agency (CSA)"; (ii) the proposed rule does , not

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-333 Comments on Proposed Rule Monitorina the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants 1

the proposed rule. While the Authority is in favor of the objectives of the proposed rule, there are constitutional issues related to the proposed random

lon the poposed rule. lC e' y ~ (The Nuclear Management and Resources Council (NUMARC) has reviewed the proposed rule and believes ti rule is unnecessary

licenses. - Comments on the specific content of the advance notice of proposed rule are being submitted to the NRC by the Nuclear Management and Resources

less frequently than annually." as required by 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4). ;The proposed change would revise this regulation to read "...shall be filed no later

3 pr 29 a - xn u 4# Authority ~ ~ MTJ1"??'e"r"" ~ l DOCKET NUMBER ^ PROPOSED RULE.!! 50 x {G'IFRaa580) June 22,1999 JPN-99-022 IPN-99-067 The Secretary

Project Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. STN 50-498, STN 50-499 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.63,- " Loss of All Alternatina Current Power" Houston Lighting

Comments on Proposed Rulemaking Concerning 10 CFR 50.59 " Changes, Tests and Experiments" 63 Fed. Rea. 56098 - October 21,1998 1. Comments on Proposed Rulemaking

generic requirements imposed since the backfit rule took offect were issued by the NRC as -1 . I exempt from the rule. Before establishing IRRIS to control the

AUthOri senor vce Prescent ano Chef Nuclear Off cer Of DOCKET NUMBER AUl - PROPOSED RULE PR so < 72 M September 20,1999 JPN-99-029 IPN-99-103 Secretary U.S. Nuclear

! " DOCKET t/ UMBER \ PROPOSED RULE ~$1 - -~ (52Re.45344) 4@f > NewYorkPower & Authority '88 JAN 28 A8 :41 Jan h ,iS2 l'9 %. JPN-88-002N6-IPN-88-002 Secretary

reviewed the proposed rule for revising backfitting process for nuclear power plants (Reference 1). The Authority supports the revised rule and recommends

on NRC Proposed Rule on Record Rotention Periods ftpr Records 1. FEDERAL REGISTER, Vol. 52, No. 208, dated October 28, 1987 regarding proposed rule on retention

the intended requirement. In addition, Section 72.236, item (c) of the proposed rule states: "(c) The cask must be designed and fabricated so that the spent

on this proposed rule. We have reviewed and accepted the industry-wide position presented by NUMARC. The detailed comments on the proposed rule contained