Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Entered dateEvent description
ENS 4842519 October 2012 17:34:00

A patient was being treated for a liver tumor and the dosage was delivered to the wrong lobe. The physician prescribed 17 mCi of Y-90 to the left lobe of the liver. The prescribing physician was not present during the dose administration procedure. The intervention radiologist examined a fluoroscope of the patient's liver and noted a larger tumor on the right lobe. The prescribed dosage was then delivered to the right lobe of the liver, not in accordance with the prescribed dosage plan. Patient examination detected no observable impact, and the physician is developing another dosage plan for the patient. The Iowa Department of Public Health will perform an onsite investigation. A Medical Event may indicate potential problems in a medical facility's use of radioactive materials. It does not necessarily result in harm to the patient.

  • * * UPDATE FROM RANDAL DAHLIN TO CHARLES TEAL ON 11/2/12 AT 1408 EDT * * *

The following was received from the State of Iowa via email: The University of Iowa nuclear medicine staff notified the Environmental Health & Safety (EHS) office on October 19, 2012 that they had discovered a reportable medical event that occurred during an October 18, 2012, therapy administration of Yttrium-90 microspheres (SIRSpheres) to a patient with liver metastases from a carcinoid tumor. The Nuclear Medicine authorized user had prescribed for the delivery of 17 millicuries of the Y-90 microspheres to the left lobe of the patient's liver with plans to also administer 34 millicuries of the Y-90 microspheres to the right lobe of the patient's liver at a later time. Y-90 activity to be administered was calculated based on body surface area and tumor involvement. However, the interventional radiologist performing the Y-90 microsphere administration under fluoroscopic guidance noted that the angiogram of the patient's liver showed more tumor blood flow in the right lobe of the patient's liver and decided it would be medically more advantageous for the patient to treat the right lobe of the liver first. He proceeded to treat the right lobe without consulting the authorized user. The interventional radiologist was only able to deliver 96% of the 17 millicurie Y-90 dose to the right lobe of the patient's liver before the right artery occluded. The authorized user discovered the administration discrepancy the next day when the patient was scheduled for post therapy imaging on October 19th. Both the patient and referring physician were informed of the medical event on October 19th. The physicians involved concluded that the patient's health and outcome were not affected by treating the right lobe of the liver first with only 17 millicuries of Y-90 microspheres since only 96% of activity could be injected before full embolization of the right hepatic artery occurred. The physicians plan to treat the left lobe of the patient's liver in approximately 4 weeks. The Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) performed an onsite investigation of this medical event on October 23, 2012. The IDPH inspector interviewed the University Radiation Safety Officer, the Nuclear Medicine Authorized User, the Interventional Radiologist performing the Y-90 administration, the Chief Nuclear Pharmacist, the Chairman of the Medical Radiation Protection Committee, and Hospital Radiation Safety Review Group. The cause of the event was a lack of understanding of the requirements for administering radioactive material under the supervision of an authorized user. The interventional radiologist made a medical decision to alter the administration site without consulting the prescribing authorized user. To avoid recurrence the following actions are being taken by the University of Iowa. All nuclear medicine authorized users prescribing Y-90 microsphere therapy will review the supervision requirements specified in Iowa Administrative Code 641-41.2(11) with all interventional radiologists on staff to ensure that they understand that they are required to follow the instructions of the prescribing authorized user. A roster of the individuals receiving this training will be forwarded to the IDPH upon completion. Additionally, nuclear medicine and interventional radiology will develop a written policy regarding the proper steps to be taken in the event that any deviation from the authorized user's written directive for the medical administration of radioactive materials is required. A copy of the policy will be forwarded to IDPH upon completion. Reporting Requirement: 35.3045(a)(1(i) - Total dose delivered that differs from the prescribed dose by 20% or more; and differs from the prescribed dose by more than 0.05 Sv (50 rem) SDE. IA Report: IA120006 Notified R3DO (Kozak) and the FSME Event Resource via email.

ENS 4842319 October 2012 16:25:00The licensee misplaced a static eliminator device containing 10 mCi of Po-210. The device model number is P-2021-8301; Serial number is A2HS590. The device was used to neutralize static charge on plastic parts prior to entering the paint process. The licensee considers the device as lost. THIS MATERIAL EVENT CONTAINS A "LESS THAN CAT 3" LEVEL OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL Sources that are "Less than IAEA Category 3 sources," are either sources that are very unlikely to cause permanent injury to individuals or contain a very small amount of radioactive material that would not cause any permanent injury. Some of these sources, such as moisture density gauges or thickness gauges that are Category 4, the amount of unshielded radioactive material, if not safely managed or securely protected, could possibly - although it is unlikely - temporarily injure someone who handled it or were otherwise in contact with it, or who were close to it for a period of many weeks. For additional information go to http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1227_web.pdf
ENS 4755427 December 2011 12:57:00The following information was received via email from the State of Iowa: The RSO of Louisa Generating Station/MidAmerican located at 8602 172nd Street, Muscatine, Iowa 52761 reported to IDPH (Iowa Department of Public Health) at 0930 CST that at approximately 0800 (CST), the courtyard operator was performing rounds and noticed that the shutter on a Texas Nuclear device (model # 5192, serial # B-2724, 50 mCi, Cesium 137) in crusher feeder / hopper 1B was detached from the device and laying on the grating directly underneath the device. (The RSO) suspects that the shutter vibrated off. The shutter is usually in the open position as the hopper is operational 24/7 measuring coal as it moves through the hopper. There were no employees in the hopper and the device sits 10-12 feet above the ground. After (IDPH spoke) with (the RSO) and considering their license conditions, (the RSO) is calling the service provider to come to their location and assess the repositioning of the shutter.
ENS 4737827 October 2011 12:12:00The state's licensee reported that they lost a NRD Nuclecel Device Model P-2021-8201, serial number A2HH880, which was shipped to the company on 09/01/10. The company noticed the device was missing on October 4th. However, the company also believes it could be installed somewhere in the facility in a location where it cannot be seen. The State's licensee has implemented the following corrective actions: 1) We will assign 1 device to its own machine cell and it will not be moved. 2) We have stopped the use of quick push/pull connections and replaced with threaded connections. 3) All Nuclecel devices are attached with yellow air hose ... and we don't use yellow air hoses on anything else. 4) We have added the devices to our month end inventory count. THIS MATERIAL EVENT CONTAINS A "LESS THAN CAT 3" LEVEL OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL Sources that are "Less than IAEA Category 3 sources," are either sources that are very unlikely to cause permanent injury to individuals or contain a very small amount of radioactive material that would not cause any permanent injury. Some of these sources, such as moisture density gauges or thickness gauges that are Category 4, the amount of unshielded radioactive material, if not safely managed or securely protected, could possibly - although it is unlikely - temporarily injure someone who handled it or were otherwise in contact with it, or who were close to it for a period of many weeks. For additional information go to http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1227_web.pdf
ENS 463821 November 2010 17:49:00The following information was received via email: (The licensee Radiation Safety Officer (RSO)), for Ames Municipal, Iowa License 0147-1-85-FG reported (to the state) via phone a 'sticky' shutter for their Texas Nuclear fixed gauge device, model number 5197, Cs-137, 100 mCi (September 1980), serial number B843. The RSO said that during a shutter check this morning at approximately 10:00 a.m. the shutter was in the closed position, however the indicator showed that it was not completely closed. This fixed gauge is usually in the open position as it is a level detection device for the coal hopper. They only close it when doing scheduled work on the machine/hopper that requires the shutter to be closed. He reports that a leak test on October 15th was good and that a radiation worker adjusted a detector on October 28th and was able to close the shutter on that day. (The RSO) reports that no employees were exposed to radiation as a result of this event and that they are going to attempt to mitigate the issue on the morning of November 2nd. He will report to the Iowa Department of Public Health for updates.
ENS 4373419 October 2007 18:43:00

A patient intervened during a vaginal iridium seed implant treatment by removing one of the needles from her body. The needle was found by a nurse approximately 30 minutes after it had been removed by the patient. The needle was located at the foot of the bed near the patients right foot and ankle. The doctor directed the nurse to place the source back into the pig. There were six sources in the needle. Total activity is 7 milliCuries of Ir-192. The estimated dose to the nurses hand was 13 milliRem, and she was wearing a whole body dosimeter, which is being examined. The estimated dose to the patients right ankle is 4.6 to 165 Rem. The patient will be monitored for acute radiation signs. The patient is in the process of receiving the planned dose.

  • * * UPDATE PROVIDED BY MELANIE RASMUSSON TO JEFF ROTTON AT 1123 EST ON 01/02/08 * * *

The State of Iowa received a recent update stating that the licensee concluded that the patient's intended dose with IMRT (external beam Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy) and the dose to the exposed areas of the patients' legs and ankles from the removed source showed no signs of skin reaction as of December 5, 2007 and was due to patient intervention. They are going to continue to follow the patient and said that they would keep the State of Iowa informed. Notified R3DO (Louden) and FSME (Flannery) A "Medical Event" may indicate potential problems in a medical facility's use of radioactive materials. It does not necessarily result in harm to the patient.