RS-13-041, 10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis Checklists

10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis Checklists

ML13024A209
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden, Peach Bottom, Oyster Creek, Byron, Braidwood, Limerick, Clinton, Quad Cities, LaSalle, Crane
Issue date:	01/23/2013
From:	Gullott D Exelon Generation Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RS-13-041
Download: ML13024A209 (123)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:RS 041 10 CFR 50.4 10 CFR 50 Appendix E January 23, 2013 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77 NRC Docket Nos. STN 50-456, 50-457, and 72-73 Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-37 and NPF-66 NRC Docket Nos. 50-454 50-455 and 72-68 Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 Facility Operating License No. NPF-62 NRC Docket No. 50-461 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Facility Operating License No. DPR-2, (Renewed) DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos. 50-010, 50-237, 50-249 and 72-37 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-1 1 and NPF-1 8 NRC Docket Nos. 50 -373, 50-374 and 72-70 Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85 NRC Docket Nos. 50 -352, 50-353 and 72-65 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket Nos. 50-219 and 72-15 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Facility Operating License No. DPR-12, (Renewed) Nos. DPR -44, and DPR-56 NRC Docket Nos. 50-171, 50-277, 50-278 and 72-29 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR -29 and DPR-30 NRC Docket Nos. 50-254, 50-265 and 72-53 1 RS-13-041 10 CFR 50.4 10 CFR 50 Appendix E January 23, 2013 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission A TIN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77 NRC Docket Nos. STN 50-456. 50-457. and 72-73 Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-37 and NPF-66 NRC Docket Nos. 50-454. 50-455 and 72-68 Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 Facility Operating License No. NPF-62 NRC Docket No. 50-461 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Facility Operating License No. DPR-2, (Renewed) DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos. 50-010. 50-237. 50-249 and 72-37 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-11 and NPF-18 NRC Docket Nos. 50-373. 50-374 and 72-70 Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85 NRC Docket Nos. 50-352. 50-353 and 72-65 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket Nos. 50-219 and 72-15 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Facility Operating License No. DPR-12, (Renewed) Nos. DPR-44, and DPR-56 NRC Docket Nos. 50-171. 50-277. 50-278 and 72-29 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-29 and DPR-30 NRC Docket Nos. 50-254. 50-265 and 72-53

January 23, 2013 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-50 NRC Docket No. 50-289

Subject:

10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis Checklists Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Braidwood Station," dated December 12, 2012 Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1 0 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Byron Station," dated December 12, 2012

3) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Clinton Power Station," dated December 12, 2012

4) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Dresden Nuclear Power Station," dated December 12, 2012

5) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for LaSalle County Station," dated December 12, 2012

6) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Limerick Generating Station," dated December 12, 2012

7) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station," dated December 12, 2012

8) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station," dated December 12, 2012

9) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station," dated December 12, 2012

10) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station," dated December 12, 2012

References:

1) 2) January 23, 2013 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-50 NRC Docket No. 50-289

Subject:

10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis Checklists

References:

1) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Braidwood Station," dated December 12, 2012

2) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Byron Station," dated December 12, 2012

3) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Clinton Power Station," dated December 12, 2012

4) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Dresden Nuclear Power Station," dated December 12, 2012

5) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for LaSalle County Station," dated December 12, 2012

6) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Limerick Generating Station," dated December 12, 2012

7) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station," dated December 12, 2012

8) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station," dated December 12, 2012

9) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate AnalysiS for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station," dated December 12, 2012 1 0) Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station," dated December 12, 2012

January 23, 2013 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 3 In References 1 through 10, Exelon Generation Company, LLC, (EGC) submitted the Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) analysis for the Exelon fleet stations in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix E, Section IV, "Content of Emergency Plans," paragraph 4. The attached Exelon fleet stations' ETE analysis checklists are being submitted as requested to facilitate NRC review of the submitted ETE analyses. There are no commitments in this letter. If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Dwi Murray at (630) 657-3695. Respectfully, David M. Gullott Manager - Licensing Exelon Generation Company, LLC Attachments: 1) 2012 Braidwood Station ETE Analysis Checklist

2) 2012 Byron Station ETE Analysis Checklist

3) 2012 Clinton Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist

4) 2012 Dresden Nuclear Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist

5) 2012 LaSalle County Station ETE Analysis Checklist

6) 2012 Limerick Generating Station ETE Analysis Checklist

7) 2012 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ETE Analysis Checklist

8) 2012 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist

9) 2012 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist 10)2012 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station ETE Analysis Checklist cc:

Operating Reactor Licensing and Outreach Branch Chief - NRC Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, Division of Preparedness and Response, NRR Operating Reactor Licensing and Outreach Branch Team Leader - NRC Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, Division of Preparedness and Response, NRR January 23, 2013 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 3 In References 1 through 10, Exelon Generation Company, LLC, (EGG) submitted the Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) analysis for the Exelon fleet stations in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix E, Section IV, "Content of Emergency Plans," paragraph

4.

The attached Exelon fleet stations' ETE analysis checklists are being submitted as requested to facilitate NRC review of the submitted ETE analyses. There are no commitments in this letter. If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Dwi Murray at (630) 657-3695. Respectfully, David M. Gullott Manager - Licensing Exelon Generation Company, LLC Attachments: 1) 2012 Braidwood Station ETE Analysis Checklist

2) 2012 Byron Station ETE Analysis Checklist

3) 2012 Clinton Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist

4) 2012 Dresden Nuclear Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist

5) 2012 LaSalle County Station ETE Analysis Checklist

6) 2012 Limerick Generating Station ETE Analysis Checklist

7) 2012 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ETE Analysis Checklist

8) 2012 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist

9) 2012 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist 10)2012 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station ETE Analysis Checklist cc:

Operating Reactor licenSing and Outreach Branch Chief - NRC Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, Division of Preparedness and Response, NRR Operating Reactor Licensing and Outreach Branch Team Leader - NRC Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, Division of Preparedness and Response, NRR 2012 Braidwood Station ETE Analysis Checklist 2012 Braidwood Station ETE Analysis Checklist

Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Braidwood Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) 1.0 Introduction a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area 2 Sect 1 should be described. yes b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of es Figure 4-1 Figure 1-1 the site, including major roadways, significant topographical y features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ. c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002. 1.1 Approach a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Section 4.3 provided. b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, yes Sect. 2.1, 3 large employers, and special events should be identified. c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control yes Sect 2.1 plans in the analysis. d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be Sect 5 5 identified by name and version. yes e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be yes Sect 6.6 described. 1.2 Assumptions a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions have been implemented. b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to support their use. 1.3 Scenario Development a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios. Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Braidwood

a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area I yes I Sect 1.2 should be described.

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of I yes I Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.

c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in I yes I Table 1-3 1-1, "ETE Comearison," of NUREG/CR-7002.

I~roach

a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be I yes I Section 4.3 rovided.

b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, I yes I Sect. 2. 1, 3 OJ I

large emelo:{ers, and seecial events should be identified. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control

c.

I Sect 2.1 lans in the anal sis. yes

d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be yes I Sect 5.5 identified b name and version.

e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be I Sect 6.6 yes s

planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective I yes I Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 been imelemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and I yes I Sect 2.1 include the basis to sueeort their use.

Scenario Oevelo~ment

a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason I yes I No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios.

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in es 4 Sect 6 development of a staged evacuation. y 1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas Figure 1 1 ERPAs should be included. yes b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6-2 in each sector. c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be yes Table 6-3 provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations. 2.0 Demand Estimation a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. The US Census should be the source of the population Sect 2 1 3 values, or another credible source should be provided. es y b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE. c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the yes Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents. 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or S t 3 1 1 justification should be provided for other values. yes ec b. Major employers should be listed. yes Table A-1 2.1.2 Transient Population a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should be included, and peak and average attendance for these yes Section 3.3, Table A-2 and A-3 facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided. b. The average population during the season should be used, yes Sect 3.3 to ~

b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction in each sector.

c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Stag Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile areal5 mile keyhole evacuations.

a.

b.

yes yes yes yes yes yes ETE. Iyes

c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the distribution for oermanent residents.

yes yes Sect 6.4 Figure 1.1 Table 6-2 Table 6-3 Table 3-1 thru 3-4 Sect 2.1,3 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent Figure 1-2 Sect 3.1.1

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Anal sis (Yes/No) itemized and totaled for each scenario. c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at Sect 3 3 facilities should be estimated. s ye d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided. Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1, 3.3 values vary should be provided. e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient population. 2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit Sect 3 1 2 dependent residents should be discussed. yes b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group yes Sect 3.1.2 should be quantified. c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent yes Sect 3.1.2 residents should be used in the analysis. d. The methodology used to determine the number of people 1 2 Sect 3 with disabilities and those with access and functional needs yes who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data. e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or yes Sect 3.1.2 justification should be provided for higher values. f. An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 programs were used in developing the estimate. g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be no Sect 5.3 provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred. 2.3 Special Facility Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided. yes Table A-4, A-5, A-6 Special facility staff should be included in the total special

c.

I ne Dercent ot permanent residents assumed to u.... ~. I yes I Sect 3.3 should be estimated.

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why I yes I Sect 2.1,3.3 values va!y should be erovided.

e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for I yes I Table 3-2 the transient eoeulation.

IOSit De~endent Permanent Residents of transit I Sect 3.1.2 yes """" vl'UvllL Iv.;JIU""'IL~.;III IV.... ""...,"" ul.;n,.,u.;ll.;llvy.

b. TransDortation resources needed to evacuate this group yes I Sect 3.1.2

c.

I ne countVllocal evacuation plans for transit dependent I Sect 3.1.2 be used in the anal~sis. yes

d. The methodology used to determine the number of people I yes I Sect 3.1.2 OJ I

with disabilities and those with access and functional needs I w who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from 10caVcounty registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the onl~ set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or I yes I Sect 3.1.2 justification should be erovided for higher values.

f.

An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration I yes I Sect 3.1.2 were used in develoeing the estimate.

g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, Ino I Sect 5.3 or other transport needed to support evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not al Facility Residents of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided.

I yes I Table A-4, A-5, A-f3 staff should be included in the total

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/NO facility population. b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data Sect 3 4 was obtained. yes c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should Table A-6 be provided. es y d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed Table A-6 to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided. yes e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., no Part of offsite agency planning process medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student yes Table 3-3 & Table A-4 Sect 3.4.2 population, and transportation resources required to support the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided. b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools yes Sect 3.4.2 are based on 100% of the school capacity. c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3. Adjustment for personal vehicles - N/A for the values used should be provided. d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary. yes Sect 6.7 2.5.1 Special Events a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event. b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient no Sect 2.4.4 population should be analyzed in the ETE. c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event no Sect 2.4.4 should be estimated. 2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP. b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to Figure 1-2 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. es y

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data was obtained.

I yes I Sect 3.4

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be... ~,..,,;.... o....

I yes ITableA-6

d. An _...,,,,......,, ___.... _ "...., "...,..... _....... __,..,_""...., ".....,1.... 1......., 11 __.............

Iyes ITableA-6 to su~~ort the evacuation of the facilit~ should be ~rovide""

e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g.,

medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and Ino I Part of offsite agency planning process other correctional facilities) should be discussed when a~~ro~riate. Schools

a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support I yes I Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & Table A-4 the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be ~rovided.

to L Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools I Sect 3.4.2

1.

are based on 100% of the.,,. h,..,.. I,."... ",.;+" I yes

c.

yes I Sect 3. Adjustment for personal vehicles - N/A A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, Ino I Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event.

b. The soecial event that er. __ ",...,......,...,......., 11.11_..., __ n. 11., """........... 111.

no Sect 2.4.4

c.

I ne percent ot permanent reSidents attendmg the event no Sect 2.4.4 should be estimated. 2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles I yes I Figure 1-2 from the NPP.

b. population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 L I Figure 1-2 yes

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes Sect 5 generated for the permanent resident pop ulation. 2.5,3 Back round and Pass Through Traffic a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios. b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. 26 Summary of Demand Estimation a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario. 3.0 Roadway Capacity a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be Sect 4 discussed. es y 3.1 Roadway Characteristics a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been yes Sect 4.1 conducted. b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the yes Sect 4.3 analysis. c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway yes Appendix C " of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided. Characteristics, d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should yes Appendix C be provided. e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node es Appendix C numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be y provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002. 3.2 Capacity Analysis a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the yes Appendix C transportation network should be described in detail and OJ I 01

c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time enerated for the oermanent resident oooulation.

2.5.3 Backaround and Pass Throuah Traffic

a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic yes should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may I yes be reduced for niahttime scenarios.

b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped enterina the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. I yes 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for I yes permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and ass-throuah demand used in each scenario.

3.0 Roadwav Capaci

a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be I

discussed. yes 3.1 Roadwav Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the analvsis.

c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway Characteristics," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be orovided.

d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should be orovided.

yes yes yes yes

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be I yes provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002.

3.2 Capacity Analvsis

a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the transoortation network should be described in detail and I yes Sect 5 Sect 2.1, 4.3 Sect 2.1, 4.3 Table 3-1 thru 3-4 Sect 4 Sect 4.1 Sect 4.3 AppendixC AppendixC AppendixC Appendix C

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling. b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information no Field information is not used should be used in the ETE calculation. 3.3 Intersection Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Appendix C unsignalized, signalized, or manned by response personnel. b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length, and turn lane queue capacity. c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is Sect 4 3 used in the calculations. es y 3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered. b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 yes Sect 2.4 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values. c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on no Impediments are addressed in PAD process streets and driveways, when applicable. 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be Sect 5 identified. yes b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical yes Appendix B relevance should be provided. c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be yes Appendix B summarized. d. The trip generation time for each population group should be Sect 5 developed from site specific information. es y 4.1.1 Permanent Residonts and Transient Population a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their Sect 5 homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Tri es y to I m

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are or manned

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle and tum lane aueue ".::>n::>".ihl

c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is used in the calculations.

The adverse weather conditIOn Should be Identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be cone>ir!oror!

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values.

c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets no yes yes yes yes yes no

....,ILlllv'-ol. generation times should be I yes

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical Jyes relevance should be erovided.

c.

Data obtained from telephone surveys should be summarized. yes

d. The trio aeneration time for each population group should be information.

yes 1 Permanent Residents and Trans.en

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their I yes homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. T.-i...

Field information is not used Appendix C Table 7-1 Sect 4.3 Sect 2.4 Sect 2.4 Impediments are addressed in PAD process I Sect S I Appendix B Appendix B SectS I Sect S

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating. b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used Sect 5 to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds. c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially Sect 5 returning to hotels prior to evacuating. yes d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sect 2.4.4 should be considered. e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the general public. 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the no Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities. offsite agency planning process. b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating yes Sect 5.3 ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents. c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency provided. planning process d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief yes Sect 5.4.3, 6.7 drivers and initiate the bus route are provided. e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit yes Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed. dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the pickup point. up point information published for the public. f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load yes Sect 6.7 passengers should be discussed. A map of bus routes should be included. no Bus information is published for the public h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special no Individual needs are part of offsite planning process vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, OJ .!.J generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home Drior to evacuatina.

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in camDarounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially return ina to hotels Drior to evacuatina.

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network with the aeneral Dublic.

4.1.2 Transit DeDendent Residents yes yes no yes

a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they I no should have been agreed upon by the responsible authorities.

b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating ambulatorv and non-ambulatorv residents.

c.

The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are rovided.

d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief drivers and initiate the bus route are Drovided.

e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to the DickuD Doint.

f.

The number of bus stops and time needed to load assenaers should be discussed. A mao of bus routes should be included. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons yes no yes yes yes no includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special I no vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, Sect 5 Sect 5 Sect 2.4.4 Sect 5 Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick up point information published for the public. Part of offsite agency planning process. Sect 5.3 Transportation resources are part of offsite agency planning process Sect 5.4.3,6.7 Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed. Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick up point information published for the public. Sect 6.7 Bus information is Dublished for the Dublic Individual needs are part of offsite planning process

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided. i. Information should be provided to support analysis of return Sect 6 7 trips, if necessary. yes 4.1.3 Special Facilities a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times 7 Sect 6 should be provided. yes b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound Sect 6 7 speeds. yes c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should

logistics part of offsite agency planning Table A-6 be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes should be discussed.

d. Time for loading of residents should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A-6 trips are needed. f. If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning be provided. g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination. h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the 7 Sect 6 time elements for the return trips. yes 4.1.4 Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times 7 Sect 6 should be provided. yes b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound Sect 6 7 speeds. yes c. Time for loading of students should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table A-4 trips are needed. e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning should be provided. f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3 pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated OJ I CD

i.

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be orovided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound soeeds.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents should be discussed.

d. Time for loadina of residents should be orovided.

e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trios are needed.

f.

If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should be orovided.

g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center rior to beina evacuated to their final destination.

h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trios.

4.1.4 Schools

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be orovided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound soeeds.

c. Time for load ina of students should be orovided.

d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trios are needed.

e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses should be orovided.

f.

yes Sect 6.7 yes Sect 6.7 yes Sect 6.7 yes Table A-6.; logistics part of offsite agency planning es Sect 6.7 yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A-6 no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning yes Sect 5.4.3 yes Sect 6.7 yes Sect 6.7 yes Sect 6.7 es Sect 6.7 yes TableA-4 no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning yes Sect 5.4.3

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) to their final destination. g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips. yes Sect 6.7 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. yes Sect 5.5 b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate N/A Traffic Simulation utilized the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate. 4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model In put a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative set of model inputs should be provided. yes Sect 5.5 b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis. 4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Out put a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be provided. b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review: yes Sect 6 1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode. 2. Network wide average travel time. 3. Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume. 4. Total vehicles exiting the network. 5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ. 6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ. c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes Appendix D scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service LOS "E" and LOS "F" conditions, OJ I CD

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trios.

4.2 ETE Modelln

a. General information about the model should be provided and demonstrates its use in ETE studies.

b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as aoorooriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation ModellnDut

a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative set of model inouts should be orovided.

b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the analvsis.

4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model OutDut

a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE should be orovided.

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review:

1.

Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode.

2.

Network wide average travel time.

3.

Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume.

4.

Total vehicles exiting the network.

5.

A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (Le., at 2,4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist includinq level of service (LOS) "ED and LOS "F" conditions, yes Sect 6.7 yes Sect 5.5 N/A Traffic Simulation utilized yes Sect 5.5 yes page v yes Sect 5.5 yes Sect 6 yes Appendix D

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) if the occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Sect 6 population. b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained. c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," yes Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002. d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of special facilities, transit de pendent, and school populations. yes Sect 6 5.0 Other Considerations 51 Development of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided. yes Sect 7 b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control plan that affect the ETE should be provided. yes Sect 7 5.2 Enhancements InEvacuation Time a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation time should be provided. yes Sect 7 b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of enhancements to local authorities should be pro yes Sect 7 5.3 State and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with these agencies should be discussed. yes Sect 2.2 b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues that may affect the ETE. no No unresolved issues 5.4 Reviews and Updates a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to be performed and submitted to the NRC. yes Sect 6.5 5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers should be provided. yes Figure 4-1 b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate no Not required

a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes I Sect 6 o ulation.

b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated I yes I Sect 6 data should be eXQlained.

c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," I yes I Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-?002.

d. ETEs should be orovided for the 100 oercent evacuation of I Sect 6 yes yes Sect?

OJ, yes Sect? a yes Sect? yes Sect? I interaction with I I Sect 2.2 yes no No unresolved Issues Sect 6.5 Figure 4-1

Criterion Addressed in ETE Anal sis Comments (Yes/No) return times for buses should be provided. c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate yes Sect 3.1.2 buses to the congregate care center. Technical Reviewer Date \\ 12z/ l 3 2 3 Supervisory Review 1 urn v Date 1- -i 3 III I ->. return times for buses should be provided.

c.

It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate buses to the conareaate care center. Technical Reviewer ~;--.< \\ ~'-'>." Y Supervisory Review /4 ~ yes Sect 3.1.2 Date \\ ;-z_:z_1 \\s. Date J - '2 :3 - J I 2012 Byron Station ETE Analysis Checklist 2012 Byron Station ETE Analysis Checklist

Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Byron Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) 1.0 Introduction a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area Sect 1 2 should be described. es y b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ. c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002. 1.1 Approach a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Section 4.3 provi b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, es 1 Sect 2 3 large employers, and special events should be identified. y c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control Sect 2 1 tans in the analysis. e y s d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be Sect 5 5 identified by name and version. es y e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be Sect 6 6 described. es y 1.2 Assumptions a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions have been implemented. b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and J es Sect 2.1 include the basis to support their use. 1,3 Scenario Development a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios. Table 8-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Byron

a.

I Ilv '""II\\....,~"""'vl t-'I{;UIIIIII~ ~v

• • '"' \\'-,.....,

Yin ** ___ 1I..... VYII~... ~....,"-'_ I Sect 1.2 should be described. yes

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of yes I Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.

c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in I yes I Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Comearison," of NUREG/CR-7002.

A~~roach

a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obta during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes I Section 4.3 rovided.

b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, I Sect. 2.1, 3 III

~ I..."... _t""t. t""t.1"'I""I_1'""".o.......,. '*"'U*U'..I t"'"n.o.",i.,..,,1.o.\\ll""'It._+...,....,.h"...,.. h.o. i,.l.o.n+ifi.o.I"I yes I C. LJ.. ;n .... u~.;IIIVII.... 11'-'11.... ""...,v t-',v.;llVIILvU VII.....;11""" VI "lUl,."",",VI II.I VI I Sect 2.1 lans in the anal sis. yes

d. Traffic simulation models used for the analvses should be I

Sect 5.5 yes yes Sect 6.6

---

L-

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption ttiat the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective I yes I Sect 2.1,3, 5.4 have been imelemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and I yes I Sect 2.1 include the basis to sueeort their use.

arlo Develo~ment

a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason I yes I No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios.

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in 4 Sect 6 development of a staged evacuation. yes 14 Evacuation Planning Areas a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas yes Figure 1.1 ERPAs should be included. b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6-2 in each sector. c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Table 6-3 Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be yes provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations. 2.0 Demand Estimation a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Po pulation a. The US Census should be the source of the population yes Sect 2.1, 3 values, or another credible source should be provided. b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE. c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the yeS Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents. 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or yes Sect 3.1.1 justification should be provided for other values. b. Major employers should be listed. yes Table A-1 2.1.2 Transient Population a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should yes Sect 3.3, Table A-2 and A-3 be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided. b. The average population during the season should be used, yes Sect 3.3 OJ N

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in develooment of a staaed evacuation.

1.4 Evacuation Plan nina Areas

a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas ERPAs) should be included.

b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction in each sector.

c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile areal5 mile keyhole evacuations.

2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools.

2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. The US Census should be the source of the population values, or another credible source should be orovided.

b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for rowth to reflect oooulation estimates to the year of the ETE.

c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the ooulation distribution for permanent residents.

2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles

a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or

• ustification should be provided for other values.

b. Maior emolovers should be listed.

2.1.2 Transient Population

a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develoo attendance values should be orovided.

b. The averaoe oooulation durina the season should be used, Sect 6.4 yes Figure 1.1 yes Table 6-2 yes Table 6-3 yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 yes Sect 2.1,3 yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent yes Figure 1-2 yes Sect 3.1.1 es TableA-1 Sect 3.3, Table A-2 and A-3 es Sect 3.3

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) itemized and totaled for each scenario. c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at Sect 3 3 facilities should be estimated. es y d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided. Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1, 3.3 values vary should be provided. e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient population. 2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit yes Sect 3.1.2 dependent residents should be discussed. b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group yes Sect 3.1.2 should be quantified. c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent yes Sect 3.1.2 residents should be used in the analysis. d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs yes Sect 3.1.2 who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data. e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or yes Sect 3.1.2 justification should be provided for higher values. f. An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 programs were used in developing the estimate. g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be no Sect 5.3 provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred. 2.3 Special Faclifty Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided. yes Table A-4, A-5, A-6 Special facility staff should be included in the total special OJ I W

c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at I

facilities should be estimated. yes

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why I yes values varv should be provided.

e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for I yes the transient coculation.

2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents

a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit decendent residents should be discussed.

I yes

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group I

should be Quantified. yes

c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent residents should be used in the analvsis.

d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the onlv set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or

• ustification should be provided for hiaher values.

f.

An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration roo rams were used in developino the estimate.

g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enouah to assure double countino has not occurred.

2.3 Special Facility Residents

a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided.

Special facilitv staff should be included in the total special yes yes yes yes no yes Sect 3.3 Sect 2.1, 3.3 Table 3-2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 5.3 Table A-4, A-5, A-f3

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) facility population. b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data Sect 3 4 was obtained. es y c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should bl T A 6 be provided. e y s a e d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed yes Table A-6 to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided. e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and no Part of offsite agency planning process other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & Table A-4 the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided. b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools ct 3 S 4 2 are based on 100% of the school capacity. e y s e c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3. Adjustment for personal vehicles - N/A for the values used should be provided. d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary. yes Sect 6.7 2.5.1 Special Events a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event. b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient Sect 2 4 4 population should be analyzed in the ETE. no c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event no Sect 2 4 4 should be estimated. 2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP. b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. yes Figure 1-2 OJ ./:...

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data was obtained.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided.

d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed to support the evacuation of the facilitv should be provided.

e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g.,

medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools yes yes yes no

a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support I yes the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided.

b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools I are based on 100% of the school capacitv.

yes

c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis I yes for the values used should be provided.

d. The need for return trios should be identified if necessarv.

I ves 2.5.1 SDeclal Events

a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, and season of the event.

b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient ooulation should be analvzed in the ETE.

c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event should be estimated.

2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles from the NPP.

b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are orovided bv sector.

no no no yes yes Sect 3.4 TableA-6 Table A-6 Part of offsite agency planning process Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & Table A-4 Sect 3.4.2 Sect 3. Adjustment for personal vehicles - N/A Sect 6.7 Sect 2.4.4 Sect 2.4.4 Sect 2.4.4 Figure 1-2 Figure 1-2

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes Sect 5 generated for the permanent resident population. 2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios. b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario. 3.0 Roadway Capacity a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be yes Sect 4 discussed. 3.1 Roadway Characteristics a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been yes Sect 4.1 conducted. b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the yes Sect 4.3 analysis. c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway yes Appendix C " of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided. Characteristics, d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should yes Appendix C be provided. e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node es Appendix C numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be y provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002. 3.2 Capacity Analysis a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the yes Appendix C transportation network should be described in detail and yes SectS yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 used to assess roadway capacity should be I yes I Sect 4 III discussed. I 01 3.1 Roadwa Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been I yes I Sect 4.1 conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the yes I Sect 4.3

c.

A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway yes I Appendix C " of NUREG/CR-7002 should be ~ro"irlorl

d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment ~,,~_._

I Appendix C be rovided. yes

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node yes IAppendixC numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002.

Capacity Analysis used to calculate the roadway capacity for the I network should be described in detail and yes IAppendixC

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling. b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information no Field information is not used should be used in the ETE calculation. 3.3 Intersection Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Appendix C unsi nalized, signalized, or manned by response personnel. b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length, and turn lane q ueue capacity. c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is Sect 4 3 used in the calculations. es y 3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered. b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 yes Sect 2.4 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values. c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways, when applicable. no Impediments are addressed in PAD process 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be S t 5 identified. s ye ec b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical yes Appendix B relevance should be provided. c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be yes Appendix B summarized. d. The trip generation time for each population group should be Sect 5 developed from site s ecific information. es y 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their S homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Tri es y ct 5 e III m identifies factors that are exoresslv used in the modelin

b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are unsianalized, signalized, or manned bv resoonse personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle lenath, and turn lane aueue caoacitv.

c.

Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is used in the calculations. 3.4 Adverse Weather

a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be considered.

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values.

c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and drivewavs, when aoolicable.

4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time no yes yes yes yes yes no

a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be I identified.

yes

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical I yes relevance should be orovided.

c.

Data obtained from telephone surveys should be I summarized. yes

d. The trip generation time for each population group should be I develooed from site soecific information.

yes 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their I

homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Tri.... yes Field information is not used. AppendixC Table 7-1 Sect 4.3 Sect 2.4 Sect 2.4 Impediments are addressed in PAD process Sect 5 Appendix B Appendix B Sect 5 Sect 5

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating. b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes Sect 5 difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds. c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially Sect 5 returnin to hotels prior to evacuating. s ye d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sect 2.4.4 should be considered. e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the general public. 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they no Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities. offsite agency planning process. b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating yes Sect 5.3 ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents. c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency provided. planning process d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief yes Sect 5.4.3 6.7 drivers and initiate the bus route are provided. e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus yes Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed. pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the pickup point. up point information published for the public. f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load yes Sect 6.7 passengers should be discussed. A map of bus routes should be included. no Bus information is published for the public h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special no Individual needs are part of offsite planning process vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, III -...j generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuatina.

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in camoarounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially returnina to hotels prior to evacuatina.

d.

Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network with the aeneral public.

4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents yes yes no yes

a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they I no should have been agreed upon by the responsible authorities.

b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating ambulatorv and non-ambulatorv residents.

c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are rovided.

d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief drivers and initiate the bus route are provided.

e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to the oickup point.

f.

The number of bus stops and time needed to load assenaers should be discussed. A map of bus routes should be included.

h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons yes no yes yes yes no includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special I no vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, Sect 5 Sect 5 Sect 2.4.4 Sect 5 Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick up point information published for the public. Part of offsite agency planning process.

Sect 5.3 Transportation resources are part of offsite agency planning process Sect 5.4.3,6.7 Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed. Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick up point information published for the public. Sect 6.7 Bus information is published for the public Individual needs are part of offsite planning process

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Anal sis Yes/No and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided. i. Information should be provided to support analysis of return S ct 6 7 trips, if necessary. es y e 4.1.3 Special Facilities a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times Sect 6 7 should be provided. s ye b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound S ct 6 7 speeds. es y e c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes Table A-6; logistics part of offsite agency planning should be discussed. d. Time for loading of residents should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A.6 trips are needed. f. If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning be provided. g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination. h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the S t 6 time elements for the return trips. es y 7 ec 4.1.4Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times ct 6 S should be provided. e y s 7 e b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound S speeds. e y s t 6 7 ec c. Time for loading of students should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table A.4 trips are needed. e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning should be provided. f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3 ass through the reception center prior to being evacuated yes I Sect 6.7 and mobilization times I Sect 6.7 yes

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound I Sect 6.7 seeds.

yes

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes I Table A-6; logistics part of offsite agency planning should be discussed.

d. Time for loading of re

e. Information should bE yes I Sect 5.4.3, Table A.6 trI S are neeaea.

f.

If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning be rovided. no

g.

III L residents are expected to pass through the reception center I yes I Sect 5.4.3 I (X)

h.

.......,...,_I~"I.... """"., 'u;..... _, 1...,1 IV...,,,,,,...,_ ""'_",\\001 __ LV.... U~II.. lIr \\.11_ I yes I Sect 6.7 times I yes I Sect 6.7 yes Sect 6.7 ime for loadin of students should be rovided. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional I yes I TableA.4

ri~s are needed.

e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses Ino I Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning should be ~rovided.

f.

If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to I yes I Sect 5.4.3 h the reception center prior to beina evacuated

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) to their final destination. g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes Sect 6.7 time elements for the return trips. 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided yes Sect 5.5 and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE N/A Traffic Simulation utilized calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate. 4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative Sect 5 5 set of model inputs should be provided. yes b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis. 4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be provided. b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to Sect 6 support review: yes 1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode. 2. Network wide average travel time. 3. Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume. 4. Total vehicles exiting the network. 5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ. 6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ. c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various Appendix D times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation es y scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service (LOS) "E" and LOS "F" conditions, OJ I co to their final destination.

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trios.

4.2 ETE Modelln

a. General information about the model should be provided and demonstrates its use in ETE studies.

b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as aoorooriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input

a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative set of model inouts should be orovided.

b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the analvsis.

4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output

a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model yes yes N/A yes yes used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE I yes should be orovided.

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review:

I yes

1.

Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode.

2.

Network wide average travel time.

3.

Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume.

4.

Total vehicles exiting the network.

5.

A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c.

Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (Le., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation I yes scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist includina level of service (LOS) "E" and LOS "F" conditions, Sect 6.7 Sect 5.5 Traffic Simulation utilized Sect 5.5 page v Sect 5.5 Sect 6 Appendix D

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) if they occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Sect 6 population. b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained. c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," yes Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002. d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of Sect 6 special facilities, transit dependent, and school populations. es y 5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the Sect 7 traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided. es y b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control Sect 7 plan that affect the ETE should be provided. es y 5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation Sect 7 time should be provided. s ye b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of Sect 7 enhancements to local authorities should be pro s ye 5.3 State and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with Sect 2 2 these agencies should be discussed. s ye b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues no No unresolved issues that may affect the ETE. 5.4 Reviews and Updates a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to Sect 6 5 be performed and submitted to the NRC. es y 5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers Figure 4-1 should be provided. e y s b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate no Not required

a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient I yes 1 Sect 6 ulation.

b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated I yes 1 Sect 6 data should be exelained.

c.

Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," I yes 1 Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002.

d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of yes r Sect 6 yes I Sect 7 OJ 1 --

--~----.------ _. ---------- -- -- - _._---- --.. -.-. Iyes I I"'tol_" +h...... + ""'JoUt"""t.,...+ +ht"""t. E:TI:: ~h_1 II"'" ht"""t. _... _\\li,.l.o.,.I Sect 7 ~ 0 v._..... II.... "...... IV ** """"................. w.... ", ******* v I", Tho. rOQI life! nf ~C!C!.o.C!C!'n"\\.o.n+C! fnr in"'tlnrt"\\\\I.o.rn.o.n+ nf.0.\\1"'=1""1 I "'=I+inn I yes Sect 7 yes Sect 7 yes Sect 2.2 no No unresolved issues Sect 6.5 Figure 4-1

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis YesINo) return times for buses should be provided. c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate yes Sect 3.1.2 buses to the congregate care center. Technical Reviewer Supervisory Review Date 1` 23 -J 3 III I.....

c.

It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate buses to the conqreqate care center. yes Sect 3.1.2 \\/2£.../\\"3, Technical Reviewer ~ "-- - ~Gate Supervisory Review ~ C2J;.!... Date lw 23 -J"? 2012 Clinton Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist 2012 Clinton Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist

Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Clinton Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) 1.0 Introduction a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area Sect 1 2 should be described. s ye b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ. c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002. 1.1A Approach a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Section 4.3 provided. b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, es Sect 2 3 1 large employers, and special events should be identified. y c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control Sect 2 1 plans in the analysis. es y d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be yes Sect 5.5 identified by name and version. e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be S ct 6 6 described. es y e 1.2 Assumptions a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions have been implemented. b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to support their use. 1.3 Scenario Development a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes Section 2.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios. Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Clinton emergency "-'_..... " _____, __, _.. __________... " _. __ Iyes be described.

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of I yes I Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.

c. A comparison (

yes I Table 1-3 >,IUKI=l.j/L;K-fUUL I

a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be I yes I Section 4.3

~rovided.

b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilitieu, I yes I Sect. 2.1, 3 OJ

~ I~..,..t"""t. l""'t.~I"\\I"\\I.o... ~ ~..",..a rool"\\.o.~i_1 'o'\\I.o.n+roo ~h_, 1I,..a h.o. i,..a.o.n4-i-Ei.o.,.,a I

c.

_.........,......,..."....., ""11""""_...,_ 1""_"-'''' ___ II....... __,.. -'CI,I_.... _1......... I Sect 2.1 lans in the anal sis. yes

d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be I Sect 5.5 identified b~ name and version.

yes

e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be I yes I Sect 6.6 described.

1.2 Assumpt

a. The planni yes I Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions nave oeen 1m lementea.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General I Sect 2.1 yes Ort tnelr use.

I e ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason I yes I Section 2.4 should be orovided for use of other scenarios.

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Anal ysis (Yes/No 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in es Sect 6 4 development of a staged evacuation. y 1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas es Fi ure 1 1 (ERPAs) should be included. y g b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6-2 in each sector. c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be no Zone 1 extends to 5 miles provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations. 2.0 Demand Estimation a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Po pulation a. The US Census should be the source of the population yes Sect 2.1 3 values, or another credible source should be provided. b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE. c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the yes Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents. 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or Sect 3 1 justification should be provided for other values. es y 1 b. Major em ployers should be listed. yes Table A-1 2.1.2 Transient Population a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should be included, and peak and average attendance for these yes Sect 3.3, Table A-2 and A-3 facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided. b. The average population during the season should be used, yes Sect 3.3 rp I'J

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in development of a staoed evacuation.

1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas

a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas ERPAs) should be included.

b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction in each sector.

c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations.

2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools.

2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. The US Census should be the source of the population values, or another credible source should be provided.

b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for rowth to reflect population estimates to the vear of the ETE.

c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the opulation distribution for permanent residents.

2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles

a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or

• ustification should be provided for other values.

b. Maior emplovers should be listed.

2.1.2 Transient Population

a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided.

b.

yes Sect 6.4 yes Figure 1.1 yes Table 6-2 no Zone 1 extends to 5 miles yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 yes Sect2.1,3 yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent yes Figure 1-2 yes Sect 3.1.1 es TableA-1 Sect 3.3, Table A-2 and A-3 es Sect 3.3

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) itemized and totaled for each scenario. c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at Sect 3 3 facilities should be estimated. es y d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided. Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1, 3.3 values vary should be provided. e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient population. 2.2 Transit Dep endent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit yes Sect 3.1.2 dependent residents should be discussed. b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group yes Sect 3.1.2 should be quantified. c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent yes Sect 3.1.2 residents should be used in the analysis. d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs yes Sect 3.1.2 who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data. e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or yes Sect 3.1.2 justification should be provided for higher values. f. An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 programs were used in developing the estimate. g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be no Sect 5.3 provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred. 2.3 Special Facility Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided. yes Table A-4, A-5 Special facility staff should be included in the total special OJ I W itemized and totaled for each scenario.

c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at facilities should be estimated.

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why values varv should be provided.

e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for the transient population.

2.2 Transit Deoendent Permanent Residents

a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit dependent residents should be discussed.

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group should be auantified.

c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent residents should be used in the analvsis.

d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or

'ustification should be provided for hiqher values.

f.

An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration roarams were used in developina the estimate.

g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enouah to assure double countina has not occurred.

2.3 Soeclal Facilitv Residents

a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided.

Special facility staff should be included in the total special yes Sect 3.3 yes Sect 2.1, 3.3 yes Table 3-2 yes Sect 3.1.2 yes Sect 3.1.2 yes Sect 3.1.2 yes Sect 3.1.2 yes Sect 3.1.2 yes Sect 3.1.2 no Sect 5.3 yes Table A-4, A-5

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) facility population. b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data Sect 3 4 was obtained. es y c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should Table A-4 be provided. es y d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed Table A-4 to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided. es y e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and no Part of offsite agency planning process other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & Table A-5 the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided. b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools yes Sect 3.4.2 are based on 100% of the school capacity. c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3. Adjustment for personal vehicles - N/A for the values used should be provided. d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary. yes Sect 6.7 2.5.1 Special Events a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, yes Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event. b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient yes Sect 2.4.4 population should be analyzed in the ETE. c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event should be estimated. es y Se t 6 5 c 2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP. b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. yes Figure 1-2 OJ

1.

c.

yes

d.

yes

e.

no

a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support I yes the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be nrn\\lirlQrl

b. Transportation resources are based on 100% of th

c.

A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, and season of the event.

b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient lation should be anal zed in the ETE.

Qnt nf nQrm<:>nQnt rQe>irlQnte> <:>ttQnrlinn thQ Q\\lQnt .... II_UI_...,."'" "".... LIII..... L"""U. 2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles from the NPP.

b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to EPZ are nrn\\lirl""rl h\\l <'"",..+.... r I yes yes yes I

I yes I yes Sect 3.4 TableA-4 TableA-4 Part of offsite agency planning process Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & Table A-5 Sect 3.4.2 Sect 3. Adjustment for personal vehicles - N/A I Sect 2.4.4 Sect 2.4.4 Sect 6.5 I Figure 1-2 I Figure 1-2

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes Sect 5 generated for the permanent resident population. 2,5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios. b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and ass-throw h demand used in each scenario. 3.0 Roadway Capacity a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be Sect 4 discussed. es y 3.1 Roadway Characteristics a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been Sect 4 1 conducted. es y b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the yes Sect 4.3 analysis. c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway yes Appendix C Characteristics, of NUREG/CR-7002 should be rovided. d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should yes Appendix C be provided. e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be yes Appendix C provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002. 3.2 Capacity Analysis a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the A es y transportation network should be described in detail and pendix C p CD I 01

c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time enerated for the permanent resident population.

2.5.3 Backaround and Pass Throuah Traffic

a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may be reduced for niohttime scenarios.

b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped enterina the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification.

2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and ass-throuah demand used in each scenario.

3.0 Roadwav CaDaci

a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be discussed.

3.1 Roadwav Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the analvsis.

c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway Characteristics," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be orovided.

d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should be orovided.

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002.

3.2 CaDacitv Analvsis

a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the transportation network should be described in detail and yes Sect 5 yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 yes Sect 4 yes Sect 4.1 yes Sect 4.3 yes Appendix C yes Appendix C yes Appendix C yes Appendix C

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling. b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information no Field information is not used should be used in the ETE calculation. 3.3 Intersection Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Appendix C unsi nalized, signalized, or manned b response personnel. b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length, and turn lane queue capacity. c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is Sect 4 3 used in the calculations. es y 3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered. b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 yes Sect 2.4 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values. c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways, when applicable. no Impediments are addressed in PAD process 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be Sect 5 identified. es y b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical yes Appendix B relevance should be provided. c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be yes Appendix B summarized. d. The trip generation time for each population group should be developed from site specific information. es y Sect 5 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Trip es y Sect 5 OJ en identifies factors that are expressly used in the modelin

b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are unsicmalized, signalized, or manned by response personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle lenath, and turn lane queue capacity.

c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is used in the calculations.

3.4 Adverse Weather

a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be considered.

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values.

c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways, when applicable.

4.0 DeveloDment of Evacuation Times 4.1 TrlD Generation Time

a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical relevance should be provided.

c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be summarized.

d. The trip generation time for each population group should be developed from site specific information.

4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient PODulation

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Tri no Field information is not used.

yes Appendix C yes Table 7-1 yes Sect 4.3 yes Sect 2.4 yes Sect 2.4 no Impediments are addressed in PAD process yes SectS yes Appendix B yes Appendix B yes SectS yes Sect S

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating. b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes Sect 5 difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds. c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially Sect 5 returning to hotels prior to evacuating. es y d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sect 2.4.4 should be considered. e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the general public. 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they no Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities. offsite agency planning process. b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating yes Sect 5.3 ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents. c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency provided. planning process d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief yes Sect 5.4.3, 6.8 drivers and initiate the bus route are provided. e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus yes Sect 6.8; Trans to pick up points not addressed. pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the pickup point. up point information published for the public. f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load yes Sect 6.8 passengers should be discussed. A map of bus routes should be included. no Bus information is published for the public. h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special no Individual needs are part of offsite planning process vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, OJ I -.J generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuatina.

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in camparounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially returnina to hotels prior to evacuatina.

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network with the aeneral public.

4.1.2 Transit Oeoendent Residents yes yes no yes

a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they I no should have been agreed upon by the responsible authorities.

b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating ambulatorv and non-ambulatorv residents.

c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are rovided.

d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief drivers and initiate the bus route are provided.

e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to the pickup point.

f.

The number of bus stops and time needed to load assenaers should be discussed. A map of bus routes should be included. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, yes no yes yes yes no no Sect 5 Sect 5 Sect 2.4.4 Sect 5 Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick up point information published for the public. Part of offsite agency planning process. Sect 5.3 Transportation resources are part of offsite agency planning process Sect 5.4.3, 6.8 Sect 6.8; Trans to pick up points not addressed. Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick up point information published for the public. Sect 6.8 Bus information is published for the public. Individual needs are part of offsite planning process

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Anal sis (Yes/No) and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided. i. Information should be provided to support analysis of return Sect 6 8 trips, if necessary. es y 4.1.3 Special Facilities a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times Sect 6 8 should be provided. s ye b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound Sect 6 8 speeds. es y c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes Table A-4; logistics part of offsite agency planning should be discussed. d. Time for loading of residents should be provided. yes Sect 6.8 e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A.4 trips are needed. f. If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning be provided. g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination. h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the Sect 6 8 time elements for the return trips. es y 4.1.4 Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times Sect 6 8 should be provided. es y b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound Sect 6 8 seeds. es y c. Time for loading of students should be provided. yes Sect 6.8 d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table A.5 trips are needed. e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses should be provided. no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3 pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated OJ I CD

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound speeds.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents should be discussed.

d. Time for loadina of residents should be provided.

e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trips are needed.

f.

If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should be provided.

g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center rior to beina evacuated to their final destination.

h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips.

4.1.4 Schools

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound speeds.

c. Time for loadina of students should be provided.

d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trios are needed.

e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses should be provided.

f.

yes Sect 6.8 yes Sect 6.8 yes Sect 6.8 yes Table A-4; logistics part of offsite agency planning es Sect 6.8 yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A.4 no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning yes Sect 5.4.3 yes Sect 6.8 yes Sect 6.8 yes Sect 6.8 es Sect 6.8 yes TableA.5 no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning yes Sect 5.4.3

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) to their final destination. g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the Sect 6 7 time elements for the return trips. es y 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided Sect 5 5 and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. es y b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate N/A Traffic Simulation utilized the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate. 4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model In put a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative Sect 5 5 set of model inputs should be provided. es y b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis. 4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be provided. b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review: yes Sect 6 1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode. 2. Network wide average travel time. 3. Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume. 4. Total vehicles exiting the network. 5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ. 6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ. c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes Appendix D scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service LOS "E" and LOS "F° conditions, OJ I CD to their final destination.

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips.

4.2 ETE Modelln

a. General information about the model should be provided and demonstrates its use in ETE studies.

b. If a traffic simUlation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation ModellnDut

a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative set of model inputs should be provided.

b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the analvsis.

4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model OutDut

a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model yes yes N/A yes yes used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE I yes should be provided.

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review:

I yes

1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode.

2.

Network wide average travel time.

3.

Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume.

4. Total vehicles exiting the network.

5.

A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (i.e., at 2,4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation I yes scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist includina level of service (LOS) "En and LOS "F" conditions, Sect 6.7 Sect 5.5 Traffic Simulation utilized Sect 5.5 page v Sect 5.5 Sect 6 Appendix D

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) if they occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Sect 6 population. b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained. c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," no Zone I extends to 5 miles of NUREG/CR-7002. d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of Sect 6 sped al facilities, transit dependent, and school populations. es y 5.0 Other Considerations 51 Development of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the Sect 7 traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided. es y b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control ct 7 S Ian that affect the ETE should be provided. e y s e 5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation Sect 7 time should be provided. s ye b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of ct 7 S enhancements to local authorities should be provided. yes e 5.3 State and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with these agencies should be discussed. yes Sect 2.2 b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues no No unresolved issues that may affect the ETE. 5.4 Reviews and U pdates a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to 6 be performed and submitted to the NRC. es y Sect 6. 5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers Figure 4-1 should be provided. s ye b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate no Not required CD I..... o if they occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public

a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient I yes ooulation.

b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated I yes data should be exolained.

c.

Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," I no of NUREG/CR-7002.

d.

ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of soecial facilities, transit dependent, and school oooulations. 5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans

a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the traffic control olan used in the analvsis should be orovided.

b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control Ian that affect the ETE should be orovided.

5.2 Enhancements In Evacuation Time

a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation time should be orovided.

b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of enhancements to local authorities should be orovided.

5.3 State and Local Review

a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with these aaencies should be discussed.

b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues that may affect the ETE.

5.4 Reviews and Updates

a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to be oerformed and submitted to the NRC.

5.5 Reception Centers and Conareaate Care Center

a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers should be orovided.

b.

yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes no Sect 6 Sect 6 Zone 1 extends to 5 miles Sect 6 Sect 7 Sect 7 Sect 7 Sect 7 Sect 2.2 No unresolved issues Sect 6.6 Figure 4-1 Not reauired

Criterion Addressed in ETE Analysis Comments (Yes/No) return times for buses should be provided. c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate yes Sect 3.1.2 buses to the congregate care center. Technical Reviewer Date \\ / 2z/ \\-3 Supervisory Review 14+., L Date 1-23 -13 OJ I...... return times for buses should be orovided.

c.

It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate buses to the conareaate care center. yes Technical Reviewer ~ \\'. ~. Supervisory Review fL f1.J;A Sect 3.1.2 Date \\ /"27.../ \\~ Date J I J 2012 Dresden Nuclear Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist 2012 Dresden Nuclear Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist

Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Dresden Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No 1.0 Introduction a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area should be described. yes Sect 1.2 b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ. c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Com arison," of NUREG/CR-7002. 1.1 Approach a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Section 4.3 provided. b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, large employers, and special events should be identified. yes Sect. 2.1, 3 c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control plans in the analysis. yes Sect 2.1 d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be identified by name and version. yes Sect 5.5 e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be described. yes Sect 6.6 1.2 Assumptions a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions have been implemented. b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to support their use. 1.3 Scenario Development a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios. Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Dresden

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in 4 Sect 6 development of a staged evacuation. yes 1.4 Evacuation Plannin g Areas a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas yes Figure 1.1 (ERPAs) should be included. b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6-2 in each sector. c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Table 6-3 Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be yes provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations. 2.0 Demand Estimation a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. The US Census should be the source of the population yes Sect 2.1, 3 values, or another credible source should be provided. b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE. c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the yes Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents. 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or 1 Sect 3 1 justification should be provided for other values. yes b. Major employers should be listed. yes Table A-1 2.1.2 Transient Population a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should yes Sect 3.3, Table A-2 and A-3 be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided. b. The average population during the season should be used, yes Sect 3.3 CD N 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in develooment of a staqed evacuation.

1.4 Evacuation Plannlna Areas

a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas ERPAs) should be included.

b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction in each sector.

c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile areal5 mile keyhole evacuations.

2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools.

2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. The US Census should be the source of the population values, or another credible source should be orovided.

b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for rowth to reflect oooulation estimates to the vear of the ETE.

c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the ooulation distribution for oermanent residents.

2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles

a.

a.

b.

yes Sect 6.4 yes Figure 1.1 yes Table 6-2 yes Table 6-3 yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 yes Sect 2.1,3 yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent yes Figure 1-2 yes Sect 3.1.1 es TableA-1 Sect 3.3, Table A-2 and A-3 es Sect 3.3

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) itemized and totaled for each scenario. c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at yes Sect 3.3 facilities should be estimated. d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided. Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1, 3.3 values vary should be provided. e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient population. 2.2 TransitDependent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit yes Sect 3.1.2 dependent residents should be discussed. b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group yes Sect 3.1.2 should be quantified. c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent yes Sect 3.1.2 residents should be used in the analysis. d. The methodology used to determine the number of people 2 Sect 3 1 with disabilities and those with access and functional needs yes who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data. e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or yes Sect 3.1.2 justification should be provided for higher values. f. An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 programs were used in developing the estimate. g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, Sect 5 3 or other transport needed to support evacuation should be no provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred. 2.3 Special Facility Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided. yes Table A-4, A-5, A-6 Special facility staff should be included in the total special CD I W itemized and totaled for each scenario.

c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at I

facilities should be estimated. yes

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why I yes values varv should be provided.

e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for I yes the transient population.

2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents

a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit I

dependent residents should be discussed. yes

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group I

should be auantified. yes

c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent residents should be used in the analvsis.

d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the onlv set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or

'ustification should be provided for hioher values.

f.

An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration roarams were used in developina the estimate.

g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enouah to assure double countina has not occurred.

2.3 Special Facility Residents

a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided.

Special facilitv staff should be included in the total special yes yes yes yes no yes Sect 3.3 Sect 2.1, 3.3 Table 3-2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 5.3 Table A-4, A-5, A-6

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysl5 (Yes/No) facility population. b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data was obtained. yes Sect 3.4 c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided. yes Table A-6 d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided. yes Table A-6 e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and no Part of offsite agency planning process other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & Table A-4 the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided. b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools are based on 100% of the school capacity. yes Sect 3.4.2 c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3. Adjustment for personal vehicles - N/A for the values used should be provided. d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary. yes Sect 6.7 2.5.1 Special Events a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event. b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient population should be analyzed in the ETE. no Sect 2.4.4 c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event should be estimated. no Sect 2.4.4 2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP. b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. yes Figure 1-2 OJ

1.

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data was obtained.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be orovided.

d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed to suooort the evacuation of the facility should be orovided.

e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g.,

medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when aoorooriate. 2.4 Schools

a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be orovided.

b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools are based on 100% of the school caoacity.

c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis for the values used should be orovided.

d. The need for return trios should be identified if necessa.*.

2.5.1 Special Events

a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, and season of the event.

b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient ooulation should be analvzed in the ETE.

c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event should be estimated.

2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles from the NPP.

b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are orovided by sector.

yes Sect 3.4 yes TableA-6 yes TableA-6 no Part of offsite agency planning process yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & Table A-4 yes Sect 3.4.2 yes Sect 3. Adjustment for personal vehicles - N/A es Sect 6.7 no Sect 2.4.4 no Sect 2.4.4 no Sect 2.4.4 yes Figure 1-2 yes Figure 1-2

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes Sect 5 generated for the permanent resident population. 2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios. b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped yes Sect 2.1 4.3 entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario. 3.0 Roadway Capacity a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be ct 4 S discussed. es y e 31 Roadway Characteristics a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been Sect 4 1 conducted. es y b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the yes Sect 4.3 analysis. c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway yes Appendix C Characteristics, of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided. d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should yes Appendix C be provided. e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be yes Appendix C provided and should be similar to Figure 3 -1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002. 3.2 Capacity Analysis a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the yes Appendix C transportation network should be described in detail and CD I C11

c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time enerated for the oermanent resident oooulation.

2.5.3 8ackaround and Pass Throuah Traffic

a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may be reduced for niahtlime scenarios.

b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped enterina the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification.

2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and ass-throuah demand used in each scenario.

3.0 Roadway Capaci

a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be discussed.

3.1 RoadwaY Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the analvsis.

c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway Characteristics," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be orovided.

d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should be orovided.

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002.

3.2 Capacity AnalYsis

a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the transDortation network should be described in detail and yes SectS yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 yes Sect 4 yes Sect 4.1 yes Sect 4.3 yes AppendixC yes AppendixC yes AppendixC yes Appendix C

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling. b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information no Field information is not used should be used in the ETE calculation. 3.3 Intersection Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Appendix C unsi nalized, signalized, or manned b response personnel. b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length, and turn lane q ueue capacity. c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is yes Sect 4.3 used in the calculations. 3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered. b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 yes Sect 2.4 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values. c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways, when applicable. no Impediments are addressed in PAD process 4,0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be Sect 5 identified. s ye b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical yes Appendix B relevance should be provided. c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be yes Appendix B summarized. d. The trip generation time for each population group should be Sect 5 developed from site specific information. s ye 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Trip es y Sect 5 OJ 0,

b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are unsianalized, signalized, or manned bv response personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle lenath, and turn lane aueue capacity.

c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is used in the calculations.

3.4 Adverse Weather

a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be considered.

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values.

c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways, when applicable.

4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time

a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, no yes yes yes yes yes no yes area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical I yes relevance should be provided.

c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be I

summarized. yes

d. The trip generation time for each population group should be I developed from site specific information.

yes 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their I

homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Tri.... yes Field information is not used Appendix C Table 7-1 Sect 4.3 Sect 2.4 Sect 2.4 Impediments are addressed in PAD process SectS Appendix B Appendix B SectS Sect S

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analbsis (Yes/No) generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating. b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes Sect 5 difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds. c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially t 5 S returning to hotels prior to evacuating. es y ec d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sect 2.4.4 should be considered. e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the general public. 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they no Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities. offsite agency planning process. b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating yes Sect 5.3 ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents. c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency provided. planning process d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief yes Sect 5.4.3 6.7 drivers and initiate the bus route are provided. e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus yes Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed. pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the pickup point. up point information published for the public. f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load yes Sect 6.7 passengers should be discussed. A map of bus routes should be included. no Bus information is published for the public h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special no Individual needs are part of offsite planning process vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, CD I -...j yes

c.

yes

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected I no should be considered.

e.

I he triP generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network I yes with the and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they I no should have been agreed upon by the responsible authorities.

b.

should be included on the means of evacuating and non-ambulatorv residents.

c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are

d.

e.

The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special vehicles. time to drive to the home of r<>",irl<>nt" yes no yes yes yes SectS Sect 5 Sect 2.4.4 SectS Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick up point information published for the public. Part of offsite Sect 5.3 Transportation resources are part of offsite agency Sect 5.4.3, 6.7 Individual needs are part of offsite planning process

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided. i. Information should be provided to support analysis of return Sect 6 7 trips, if necessary. es y 4.1.3 Special Facilities a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times Sect 6 7 should be provided. es y b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound t 6 S 7 speeds. s ye ec c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes Table A-6; logistics part of offsite agency planning should be discussed. d. Time for loading of residents should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A.6 trips are needed. f. If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning be provided. g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination. h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the S t 6 7 time elements for the return trips. e y s ec 4.1.4 Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times t 6 Se 7 should be provided. es y c b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound Sect 6 7 speeds. es y c. Time for loading of students should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table A.4 trips are needed. e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses should be provided. no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3 pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated OJ I 00 logistics and mobilization times

b.

c.

vehicles should

e.

It return trios are needed. the destination of school buses

f.

If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to h the receotion center orior to beina evacuated yes Sect6.? yes Sect 6.? yes Sect6.? yes Table A-6; logistics part of offsite agency planning yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A.6 no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning yes Sect 5.4.3 yes Sect 6.? Sect6.? Sect 6.? yes Table A.4 no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning yes Sect 5.4.3

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Anal sis (Yes/No) to their final destination. g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes Sect 6.7 time elements for the return trips. 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided yes Sect 5.5 and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate N/A Traffic Simulation utilized the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate. 4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative ct 5 S 5 set of model inputs should be provided. es y e b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis. 4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be provided. b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review: yes Sect 6 1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode. 2. Network wide average travel time. 3. Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume. 4. Total vehicles exiting the network. 5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ. 6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ. c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes Appendix D scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service LOS "E" and LOS "F" conditions, OJ, co to their final destination.

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the retum trios.

4.2 ETE Modelln

a. General information about the model should be provided and demonstrates its use in ETE studies.

b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as aoorooriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation ModellnDut

a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative set of model inouts should be orovided.

b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the analvsis.

4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model OutDut

a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model yes yes N/A yes yes used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE I yes should be orovided.

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review:

I yes

1.

Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode.

2.

Network wide average travel time.

3.

Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume.

4.

Total vehicles exiting the network.

5.

A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation I yes scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist includina level of service (LOS) "En and LOS "F" conditions, Sect 6.7 Sect 5.5 Traffic Simulation utilized Sect 5.5 page v Sect 5.5 Sect 6 Appendix D

Criterion Addressed in ETE Anai sis Comments (Yes/No) if they occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Sect 6 population. b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained. c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," yes Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002. d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of sped al facilities, transit dependent, and school populations. yes Sect 6 5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided. yes Sect 7 b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control plan that affect the ETE should be provided. yes Sect 7 5.2 Enhancements In Evacuation Time a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation time should be provided. yes Sect 7 b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of enhancements to local authorities should be provided. yes Sect 7 5.3 State and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with these agencies should be discussed. yes Sect 2.2 b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues that may affect the ETE. no No unresolved issues 5.4 Reviews and U pdates a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to be performed and submitted to the NRC. yes Sect 6.5 5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers should be provided. yes Figure 4-1 b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate no Not required OJ I ->. o

a.

o UlatIon.

b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all data ShOUld De ex lamed.

c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs yes I Sect 6 yes I Sect 6 yes I

Sect 6 Sect 6 Sect? Sect? Sect? Sect? Sect 2.2 No unresolved issues Sect 6.5 Figure 4-1

Criterion Addressed in ETE Anal s Comments (Yes/No) return times for buses should be provided. c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate yes Sect 3.1.2 buses to the congregate care center. Technical Reviewer Supervisory Review t^ d" Date /- 23 -1,? CD I return times for buses should be Drovided.

c.

It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate buses to the conqreqate care center. yes Sect 3.1.2 \\/7..."2../\\5. Technical Reviewer ~ \\..,~"\\ \\.1'-~Date Supervisory Review L ~ Date /-23-{] 2012 LaSalle County Station ETE Analysis Checklist 2012 LaSalle County Station ETE Analysis Checklist

Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist LaSalle Criterion Addressed in ETE Analysis Comments (Yes/No) 1.0 Introduction a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area should be described. yes Sect 1.2 b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ. c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002. 11 Approach a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Section 4.3 provided. b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, large employers, and special events should be identified. yes Sect. 2.1, 3 c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control plans in the analysis. yes Sect 2.1 d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be identified by name and version. yes Sect 5.5 e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be described. yes Sect 6.6 1.2 Assumptions a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions have been implemented. b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to support their use. 1.3 Scenario Development a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios. CD I..... Table 8-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist LaSalle The emergency planning zone (EPZ) should be described.

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.

c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in Table 1-1. "ETE Comparison." of NUREG/CR-7002.

~ l...... r_l""'Io _"-I""lI_\\/.o.rroo ..........,..! roo_.o.,..i...... 1 l""'t.\\ll""'Io"+roo roohnl II"'! h.o. irll""'t..... +ifi.o.,..!

c.

,-,,,,.n,,,U.,;Jo;;II',,,," o;;II.,V\\AIU..,'" lJ.v.,;Jv.... ""'.... VII u.,;r_ 10.".........,.'",",VI.Io..VI

d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be name and version.

e. MethOdS used to address data uncertainties.... vu...........

ions

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective actions have been im~lemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, Assumptions,* of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and include the basis to support their use.

ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysiS, or a reason should be provided for use of other scenarios. yes yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 yes Table 1-3 yes I Section 4.3 I yes Sect. 2.1,3 yes I Sect 2.1 yes I Sect 5.5 I yes I Sect 6.6 I yes I Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 I yes I Sect 2.1 yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in Sect 6 4 development of a staged evacuation. yes 1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas es Figure 1 1 (ERPAs) should be included. y b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6-2 in each sector. c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be yes Table 6-3 provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations. 2.0 Demand Estimation a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. The US Census should be the source of the population yes Sect 2.1, 3 values, or another credible source should be provided. b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE. c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the yes Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents. 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or Sect 3 1 1 justification should be provided for other values. es y b. Major employers should be listed. yes Table A-1 2.1.2 Transient Population a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should be included, and peak and average attendance for these yes Sect 3.3, Table A-2 & A-3 facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided. b. The average population during the season should be used, yes Sect 3.3 CD ~

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in develooment of a staaed evacuation.

1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas

a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas ERPAs) should be included.

b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction in each sector.

c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile areal5 mile keyhole evacuations.

2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools.

2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. The US Census should be the source of the population values, or another credible source should be orovided.

b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for rowth to reflect oooulation estimates to the year of the ETE.

c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the ooulation distribution for oermanent residents.

2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles

a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or

'ustification should be orovided for other values.

b. Maior emoloyers should be listed.

2.1.2 Transient Population

a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develoo attendance values should be orovided.

b. The averaae oooulation durina the season should be used, Sect 6.4 yes Figure 1.1 yes Table 6-2 yes Table 6-3 yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 yes Sect 2.1,3 yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent yes Figure 1-2 yes Sect 3.1.1 es TableA-1 Sect 3.3, Table A-2 & A-3 es Sect 3.3

Criterion Addressed in ETE Analysis Comments (Yes/No) itemized and totaled for each scenario. c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at facilities should be estimated. yes Sect 3.3 d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided. Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1, 3.3 values vary should be provided. e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient population. 2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit dependent residents should be discussed. yes Sect 3.1.2 b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group should be quantified. yes Sect 3.1.2 c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent residents should be used in the analysis. yes Sect 3.1.2 d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs yes Sect 3.1.2 who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data. e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or yes Sect 3.1.2 justification should be provided for higher values. f. An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 programs were used in developing the estimate. g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be no Sect 5.3 provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred. 2.3 Special Facility Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided. yes Table A-4, A-5 Special facility staff should be included in the total special OJ I W itemized and totaled for each scenario.

c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at I

facilities should be estimated. yes

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why I yes values vary should be provided.

e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for I yes the transient population.

2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents

a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit I

dependent residents should be discussed. yes

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group I

should be Quantified. yes

c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent residents should be used in the analvsis.

d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the onlv set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or

'ustification should be provided for hiaher values.

f.

An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration roQrams were used in developina the estimate.

g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enouah to assure double countina has not occurred.

2.3 SDecial FacUlty Residents

a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided.

Special facilitv staff should be included in the total special yes yes yes yes no yes Sect 3.3 Sect 2.1, 3.3 Table 3-2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 3.1.2 Sect 5.3 Table A-4, A-5

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Anal y is (Yes/No) facility population. b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data Sect 3 4 was obtained. es y c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should Table A-5 be provided. es y d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed Table A-5 to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided. es y e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and no Part of offsite agency planning process other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & Table A-4 the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided. b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools Sect 3 4 2 are based on 100% of the school capacity. es y c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3. Adjustment for personal vehicles - N/A for the values used should be provided. d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary. yes Sect 6.7 2.5.1 Special Events a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event. b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient no Sect 2 4 4 population should be analyzed in the ETE. c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event no Sect 2 4 4 should be estimated. 2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP. b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to Figure 1-2 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. yes CD .l:..

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data was obtained.

c.

The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be orovided.

d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed to suooort the evacuation of the facilitv should be orovided.

e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g.,

medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when aoorooriate. 2.4 Schools

a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be orovided.

b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools are based on 100% of the school caoacitv.

c.

The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis for the values used should be orovided.

d. The need for return trios should be identified if necessa.*.

2.5.1 Special Events

a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, and season of the event.

b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient ooulation should be analvzed in the ETE.

c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event should be estimated.

2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles from the NPP.

b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to 15 mile area bevond the EPZ are orovided bv sector.

yes Sect 3.4 yes Table A-5 yes Table A-5 no Part of offsite agency planning process yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & Table A-4 yes Sect 3.4.2 yes Sect 3. Adjustment for personal vehicles - N/A es Sect 6.7 no Sect 2.4.4 no Sect 2.4.4 no Sect 2.4.4 yes Figure 1-2 yes Figure 1-2

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes Sect 5 generated for the permanent resident population. 2.5.3 Background and Pass Throu h Traffic a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios. b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total Table 3-1 thru 3-4 populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for yes permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario. 3.0 Roadway Capacity a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be Sect 4 discussed. yes 3.1 Roadway Characteristics a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been yes Sect 4.1 conducted. b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the yes Sect 4.3 analysis. c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway yes Appendix C " of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided. Characteristics, d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should yes Appendix C be provided. e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node es Appendix C numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be y provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002. 3.2 Capacity Analysis a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the yes Appendix C transportation network should be described in detail and

c.

yes SectS Sect 2.1, 4.3 scenarios. yes uld be assumed to have stopped hours after the initial notification. I yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 CD b rHC!'I"'" 1~~.o.rI ,yes I Sect 4 I 01 a...... _,............... _~ _I.... -,._ .... ~_ ....... '"1 ""_ "'- ____.1......... ___ II yes I Sect 4.1 conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the yes I Sect 4.3 analysis.

c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway yes AppendixC Characteristics," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided.

d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should yes Appendix C be ~rovided.

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be yes AppendixC provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002.

aclty Anal~sls capacity for the I in detail and yes IAppendixC

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling. b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information no Field information is not used should be used in the ETE calculation. 3.3 Intersection Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Appendix C unsignalized, signalized, or manned by response p ersonnel. b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length, and turn lane queue capacity. c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is Sect 4 3 used in the calculations. es y 3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered. b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 yes Sect 2.4 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values. c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways, when applicable. no Impediments are addressed in PAD process 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be Sect 5 identified. es y b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical yes Appendix B relevance should be provided. c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be yes Appendix B summarized. d. The trip generation time for each population group should be developed from site specific information. yes Sect 5 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Po ulation a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Trip es y Sect 5 CD en

b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are unsianalized, signalized, or manned bv response personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle lenath, and turn lane aueue capacitv.

c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is used in the calculations.

3.4 Adverse Weather

a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be considered.

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values.

c.

The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and drivewavs, when applicable. 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time

a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical relevance should be provided.

c.

Data obtained from telephone surveys should be summarized.

d. The trip generation time for each population group should be developed from site specific information.

4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Tri no Field information is not used yes AppendixC yes Table 7-1 yes Sect 4.3 yes Sect 2.4 yes Sect 2.4 no Impediments are addressed in PAD process yes SectS yes Appendix B yes Appendix B yes SectS yes SectS

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating. b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes Sect 5 difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds. c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially returning to hotels prior to evacuating. yes Sect 5 d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sect 2.4.4 should be considered. e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the general public. 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they no Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities. offsite agency planning process b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating Se t 5 3 ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents. es y c c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency provided. planning process d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief drivers and initiate the bus route are provided. yes Sect 5.4.3, 6.7 e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus yes Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed. pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the pickup point. up point information published for the public. f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load passengers should be discussed. yes Sect 6.7 A map of bus routes should be included. no Bus information is published for the public h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special no Individual needs are part of offsite planning process vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, OJ ~ generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home orior to evacuatina.

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in camoarounds.

c.

The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially returnina to hotels orior to evacuatina.

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network with the aeneral oublic.

4.1.2 Transit DeDendent Residents yes yes no yes

a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they I no should have been agreed upon by the responsible authorities.

b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating ambulatorv and non-ambulatorv residents.

c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are rovided.

d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief drivers and initiate the bus route are orovided.

e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to the oickuo ooint.

f.

The number of bus stops and time needed to load assenaers should be discussed. A mao of bus routes should be included. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons yes no yes yes yes no includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special I no vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, Sect 5 Sect 5 Sect 2.4.4 Sect 5 Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick up point information published for the public. Part of offsite agency planning process Sect 5.3 Transportation resources are part of offsite agency planning process Sect 5.4.3, 6.7 Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed. Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick up point information published for the public. Sect 6.7 Bus information is oublished for the oublic Individual needs are part of offsite planning process

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided. i. Information should be provided to support analysis of return trips, if necessary. yes Sect 6.7 4.1.3 Special Facilities a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound speeds. yes Sect 6.7 c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes Table A-5; logistics part of offsite agency planning should be discussed. d. Time for loading of residents should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3,Table A-5 trips are needed. f. If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should be provided. no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination. h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips. yes Sect 6.7 4.1.4 Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound speeds. yes Sect 6.7 c. Time for loading of students should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table A.4 trips are needed. e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses should be provided. no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3 pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated OJ, co yes I I yes on evacuation logistics and mobilization times rovided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound yes seeds.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should yes snould be discussed.

d. Time for loadin of residents should be rovided.

e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the yes tn s are needed.

f.

If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should no be rovided.

g.

t 1 I residents are expected to pass. through th~ r~ceptlon cen er yes ~ior to being evacuated to their final d.estlnatlon. I h c,,,.,,.,,,r+;,.,,.. ;,.,l"........... +;"n.. h",,1..1 ho,.,~"\\,,r1orl +....,..,,,,,n+,l,, tho I yes

e. It return trios are needed. the destination of school buses

f.

If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to h the receotion center orior to beina evacuated yes yes yes no yes I Sect 6.7 I Sect 6.7 I Sect 6.7 I Table A-5; logistics part of offsite agency planning I Sect 5.4.3,Table A-5 Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning Sect 5.4.3 Sect 6.7 Sect 6.7 Sect 6.7 TableA.4 Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning Sect 5.4.3

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis YesINO to their final destination. g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips. yes Sect 6.7 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. yes Sect 5.5 b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate N/A Traffic Simulation utilized the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate. 4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative set of model inputs should be provided. yes Sect 5.5 b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis. 4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be provided. b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review: yes Sect 6 1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode. 2. Network wide average travel time. 3. Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume. 4. Total vehicles exiting the network. 5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ. 6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ. c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes Appendix D scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service LOS "E" and LOS "F" conditions, OJ I co General information and demonstrates its use

b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been --< -- --_. __.:_<

a representative used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE should be rovided. yes yes N/A yes yes I yes

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to I support review:

yes

1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode.

2.

Network wide average travel time.

3.

Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume.

4.

Total vehicles exiting the network.

5.

A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c.

(';olor coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (Le., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation I yes scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist includina level of service (LOS) "E" and LOS "F" Sect 6.7 Sect 5.5 Traffic Simulation utilized Sect 5.5 page v I Sect 5.5 I Sect 6 I Appendix D

Criterion Addressed in ETE Analysis Comments Yes/No if the occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Sect 6 population. b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained. c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," yes Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002. d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of special facilities, transit dependent, and school populations. yes Sect 6 5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided. yes Sect 7 b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control plan that affect the ETE should be provided. yes Sect 7 5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation time should be provided. yes Sect 7 b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of enhancements to local authorities should be provided. yes Sect 7 5.3 State and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with these agencies should be discussed. yes Sect 2.2 b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues that may affect the ETE. no No unresolved issues 5.4 Reviews and Updates a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to be performed and submitted to the NRC. yes Sect 6.5 5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers should be provided. yes Figure 4-1 b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate no Not required The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient I yes 'Sect 6 population.

b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated I yes

'Sect 6 data should be explained.

c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," I yes I Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002.

d. ETEs should be orovided for the 100 oercent evacuation of yes I Sect 6 yes I Sect 7 OJ

-- --,1---- ------- _. --------.- -- -_.- _.-.. _- -_.. _--- ,yes I .... 1.....,,'" +h"":ll+....."HoM +ho ~T~ ~h"\\1 111""1 hl""'lo nrn\\li,.,ao,..l Sect 7 0 v...... ' **,W ** VU..............,....... wvww... v ******* v I~ Th", ~"'e:l lite: nf ~e:e:",e:e:m"'nte: fn~ imn~n\\l"'m"'nt nf "'\\I~(,II~tinn I yes Sect 7 yes Sect 7 yes Sect 2.2 no No unresolved issues yes r ects s Figure 4-1

Criterion Addressed in ETE Analysis Comments (Yes/No) return times for buses should be provided. c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate yes Sect 3.1.2 buses to the congregate care center. Technical Reviewer Date \\ / 22- / o 3 Supervisory Review <^^ Date J i 3 III I.....

c.

It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate buses to the conareaate care center. Technical Reviewer ~N>. '= §,,'--'~ Supervisory Review LL W yes Sect 3.1.2 Date \\ / 22.. I \\ 3 Date J / ~ 2012 Limerick Generating Station ETE Analysis Checklist 2012 Limerick Generating Station ETE Analysis Checklist

Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Limerick Criterion Addressed In ETE Anal sis Comments YeslNo 1.0 Introduction a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area should be described. yes Sect 1.2 b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ. c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-4 "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002. 1.1 Approach a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Sect 4.3

rovided, b.

Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, large employers, and special events should be identified. yes Sect. 2.1, 3 c, Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control fans in the analysis. yes Sect 2.1 d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be identified by name and version. yes Sect 5.5 e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be described. yes Sect 6.6 1.2 Assumptions a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions have been im plemented. b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to support their use. 1.3 Scenario Development a. The ten scenarios in Table 1 -3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios. Table B*1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Limerick Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis . (Y_u/No) 1.0 Introduction

a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area yes Sect 1.2 should be described.

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features. boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.

c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1 "ETE Comparison>> of NUREG/CR-7002.

1.1 Approach

a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Sect 4.3 provided.

r:p

b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, yes Sect. 2.1,3 large employers. and special events should be identified.

c, Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control yes Sect 2.1 plans in the analysis.

d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be yes SectS.S identified by name and version.

e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be yes SectS.6 described.

1.2 Assumptions

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3. S.4 actions have been implemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, ~General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 inclUde the basis to support their use.

1.3 Scenario Development

a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3. Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason should be provided for use of other scenarios.

yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4

Criterion Addressed in ETE Ana! sis Comments es/No 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in development of a staged evacuation. yes Sect 6.4 1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas (ERPAs) should be included. yes Figure 1-1 b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6-2 & 6-3 in each sector. c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be Yes Table 6-2 & 6-3 provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations. 2.0 Demand Estimation a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. The US Census should be the source of the population values, or another credible source should be provided. yes Sect 2.1, 3 b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE. Yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the yes Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents. 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or justification should be provided for other values. yes Sect 3.1.1 b. Major employers should be listed. es Table A-1 2.1.2 Transient Population a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should be included, and peak and average attendance for these yes Sect 3.3, Table A.2 & A-3 facilities should be listed The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided. b. The average population during the season should be used, es Sect 3.3 Criterion Addressed in Comments ere Analysis (Yes/No} 1.3.1 Staaed evacuation

s. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in yes Sect 6.4 development of a staaed evacuation.

1.4 evacuation Plannlna Areas

a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas yes Figure 1-1 (ERPAs) should be included.

b. A table should be provided Identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6-2 & 6-3 in each sector.

c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged yes Table 6-2 & 6-3 Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR*7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2. 5.

and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile arealS mile keyhole evacuations. 2.0 Demand estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four

~ population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. 2.1 Permanent ResIdents and Transient Population

a. The US Census should be the source of the population yes Sect 2.1, 3 values, or another credible source should be provided.

b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent arowth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE.

c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1,

• Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for permanent residents.

yes Figure 1-2 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles

a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or yes Sect 3.1.1 iustification should be provided for other values.

b. Maior em plovers should be listed.

yes TableA-1 2.1.2 Transient Population

a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should Sect 3.3, Table A.2 & A-3 be included, and peak and average attendance for these yes facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided.

b. The averaae population durina the season should be used Ives Sect 3.3

Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis Yes/Na itemized and totaled for each scenario. c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at facilities should be estimated. yes Sect 3.3 d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided. Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1, 33 values va should be rovided

e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient population.

2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit yes Sect 3,1,2 de ancient residents should be discussed, b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group should be quantified. yes Sect 3.1.2 c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent yes Sect 3.1.2 residents should be used In the analysis. d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs yes Sect 3.1.2 who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data, e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or yes Sect 3.1.2 justification should be provided for higher values. f. An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 programs were used in developing the estimate. g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be no Sect 5.3;

• Transportation Assistance phone numbers provided and the quantification of resources should be and pick up point information published for the public detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred.

2.3 Special Facili Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided. yes Table A-3 thru A-6 Special facility staff should be included in the total special Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE AnalYsis (Ye./No) itemized and totaled for each scenario.

c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at yes Sect 3.3 facilities should be estimated.

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1, 3.3 values vary should be orovided.

e. A sector diagram should be Included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002. showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient population.

2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents

a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit yes SectS.1.2 dependent residents should be discussed.

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group yes Sect 3.1.2 should be quantified.

c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent yes Sect 3.1.2 residents should be used In the analvsis.

~

d. The methodology used to determine the number of people yes Sect 3.1.2 with disabilities and those with access and functional needs I

who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the onlv set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or yes Sect 3.1.2 justification should be provided for higher values.

f.

An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 proarams were used in developing the estimate.

g. A summary table of the total number of buses. ambulances.

no Sect 5.3; Transportation Assistance phone numbers or other transport needed to support evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be and pick up point information published for the public detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred. 2.3 Special FacilitY Residents

a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided.

yes Table A-S thru A-6 Special facilitv staff should be included in the total special

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis ea/No facility ulation. b. A discussion should be provided on haw special facility data was obtained. yes Sect 3.4 c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should yes Table A-6 be provided.

d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed es T bl A 6 to support the evacuation of the facili should be provided.

y a e e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and no Part of offsite agency planning process other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-4 & A-4 the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided. b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools are based on 100% of the school capacity. yes Sect 3.4.2 c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3. POV adjustment n/a for the values used should be provided. d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessa yes Sect 6.7, Table 6-6 2.6.1 Special Events a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event. b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient o ulation should be anal zed In the ETE. no Sect 2.4.4 c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event should be estimated. no Sect 2,4,4 2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP. b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. yes Figure 1-2 Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE AnalYsis (Yes/No) facilitv coDulation.

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data yes Sect 3.4 was obtained.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should yes TableA-6 be provided.

d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed yes TableA-6 to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided.

e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g.,

no Part of offslte agency planning process medical support or security support for prisons. Jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools

a. A list of schools including name, location, student yes Sect 3.4.2. Table 3-4 & A-4 population, and transportation resources required to support the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided.

f

b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools yes Sect 3.4.2 are based on 100% of the school capacity.

c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis for the values used should be provided.

yes Sect 3. POVadjustment nla

d. The need for retum trips should be identified if necessary.

Ives Sect 6.7 Table 6-8 2.5.1 Special Events

a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration.

no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event.

b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient no Sect 2.4.4 population should be analvzed in the ETE.

c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event Sect 2.4.4 should be estimated.

no 2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles from the NPP.

yes Figure 1-2

b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to yes Figure 1-2 15 mile area bevond the EPZ are provided by sector.

Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis es/No c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes Sect 5 generated for the permanent resident population. 2.5.3 Background and Pass Throu gh Traffic a. The volume of background traffic and pass -through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios. b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 2.6 Summa of Demand Estimation a, A summary table should be provided that identifies the total populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for yes Table 3-1 thru 3-5 permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario. 3.0 Roadway Capacity a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be discussed. yes Sect 4 3.1 Roadway Characteristics a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been conducted. yes Sect 4.1 b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the yes Sect 4.3 anal sis. c. A table similar to that In Appendix A, "Roadway Characteristics," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided. yes Appendix C d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should be provided. yes Appendix C e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be Yes Appendix C provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002. 3.2 Capacity Analysis a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the trans rtation network should be described In detail and yes Appendix C Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE AnalYsis (YeslNo)

c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes SectS generated for the permanent resident population.

2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic S, The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for niQhttime scenarios.

b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped Sect 2.1, 4.3 entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. yes 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the lotal yes Table 3-1 thru 3-5 populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities. schools. shadow population. and pass-throuah demand used in each scenario.

3.0 Roadway Capacity r:p

a. The methodes) used to assess roadway capacity should be yes Sect 4 discussed.

01 3.1 Roadway Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been yes

$ect4.1 conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey. and types of information gathered and used in the yes Sect 4.3 analysiS.

c. A table similar to that In Appendix A. "Roadway yes Appendix C Characteristics

• of NUREG/CR*7002 should be provided.

d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should yes Appendix C be provided.

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node yes Appendix C numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002.

3.2 Capacity Analysis

a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the AppendixC transportation network should be described In detail and yes

Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis es/No identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling. b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information no field information is not used should be used in the ETE calculation. 3.3 Intersection Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Appendix C unsi nalized signalized, or manned by response personnel. b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length, and turn lane queue capacity. c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is used in the calculations. y Sect 4.3 3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered. b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 yes Sect 2.4 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values. c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways, when applicable. no impediments are addressed in PAD process 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be identified. yes Sect 5 b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical yes Appendix 8 relevance should be provided. c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be summarized. yes Appendix B d. The trip generation time for each population group should be developed from site specific information, yes Sect 5 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Tri es y Sect 5 Criterion Addressed in Comments erE Analvsls

• • fYeslNo) identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling.

b. The capacity analysis identifies where field Information no field information is not used should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Append/xC unsignalized signalized or manned bv resoonse Dersonnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length and turn lane queue capacity.

c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is yes Sect 4.3 used in the calculations.

3.4 Adverse Weather

a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered.

~

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table yes Sect 2.4 3-1, 'Weather Capacity Factors,* of NUREG/CR-7002 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values.

c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on no impediments are addressed in PAD process streets and drivewavs when applicable.

4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time

a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be yes SectS identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants. and statistical yes Appendix a relevance should be provided.

c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be yes Appendix a summarized.

d. The trip generation time for each population group should be yes Sect 5 developed from site specific information.

4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient PODulation

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their yes Sect 5 homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Trip

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating. b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes Sect 5 difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds. c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially S t 5 returning to hotels prior to evacuating. es y ec d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sect 2.4.4 should be considered. e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the general public. 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they no Transportation Assistance numbers and pick phone should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities, offsite a nc planning process b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating yes Sect 5.3 ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents. c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency

provided, planning process d.

Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief drivers and Initiate the bus route are provided. yes Sect 5.4.3, 6.7 a. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus yes Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed, pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the pickup point. u point information published for the public f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load Sect 6 7 passengers should be discussed. es y A map of bus routes should be included. no Bus information is published for the public h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special no Individual needs are part of offsite planning process vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE AnalYsis (YeslNo) generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuatina.

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes Sect 5 difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or In camDarounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially Sect 5 return!nll to hotels Drior to evacuating.

yes

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Seot2.4.4 should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the general Dublic.

4.1.2 Transit Decendent Residents I r:p

a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the erE analysis. If new plans are developed with the erE, they no Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities.

offs/fe agency planning process

b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating Sect 5.3 ambulatory and non-ambulatorv residents.

yes

c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offs;te agency provided.

I planning process

d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses. brief yes Sect 5.4.3,6.7 drivers and Initiate the bus route are provided.

e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit yes Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed.

dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the DickuD Doint. up point information published for the public

t.

The number of bus stops and time needed to load Sect 6.7 passenQers should be discussed. yes

g. A mao of bus routes should be included.

no Bus information is published for the DubUc

h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special no Individual needs are part of offslte planning process vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents. loadinll time

Criterion Addressed in ETE Analysis Comments and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided, i. Information should be provided to support analysis of return tri s, if necessary. yes Sect 6.7 4.1,3 Special Facilities a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound speeds. yes Sect 6.7 c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes Table A-6 ; logistics part of offsite agency planning should be discussed. d. Time for loading of residents should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 a. Information should be provided that Indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A-6 trips are needed. f. If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should be provided. no Host facilities are art of offsite a enc Ian nin P g y p g g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 rior to being evacuated to their final destination. h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return tris. yes Sect 6.7 4.1.4 Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times e should be provided. y s Sect 6,7 b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound speeds. yes Sect 6,7 c. Time for loading of students should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table A-4, Table 6-6 trips are needed. e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses should be rovided no Host Schools are plan part of offsite agency nin g f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3; Schools evacuate directly to host schools ass throe h the reception center prior to being evacuated Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis (yes/No) and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided.

i.

Information should be provided to support analysis of return yes SectS.7 trips. if necessary. 4.1.3 special Facilities

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times yes SectS.7 should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound yes SectS.7 speeds.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should Table A-6 ; logistics part of oftsite agency planning be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes should be discussed.

d. Time for loadina of residents should be provided.

yes SectS.7

e. Information should be provided that Indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A-6 trips are needed.

f.

If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should no Host facilities are part of offslte agency plan ning be orovided.

g. Discussion should be provided on Whether speCial facility

~ residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination.

h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes SectS.7 time elements for the return trips.

4.1.4 Schools

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times yes SectS.7 should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound yes SectS.7 speeds.

c. Time for loading of students should be provided.

yes SectS.7

d. 'nformation should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table A-4, Table S-6 trips are needed.

e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses no Host Schools are part of offsite agency plan ning should be provided.

f.

If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3; Schools evacuate directly to host schools pass throuah the reception center prior to being evacuated

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis es/No to their final destination. g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips. yes Sect 6.7 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided yes Sect 5 5 and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate N/A traffic simulation utilized the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate. 4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model In put a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative set of model in uts should be provided. yes Sect 5.5 b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis. 4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be provided. b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review: yes Sect 6 1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode. 2. Network wide average travel time. 3. Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume. 4. Total vehicles exiting the network. 5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ. 6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ. c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes Appendix 0 scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service LOS "E" and LOS "F" conditions Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analvsls (Yes/No) to their final destination.

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes Sect 6.7 time elements for the return trips.

4.2 erE Modeling

a. General information about the model should be provided yes Sect 5.5 and demonstrates its use in ETE studies.

b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE N/A traffic simulation utilized calculation, 8ufficient detail should be provided to validate the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met as appropriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input

a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative yes Sect 5.5 set of model inputs should be provided.

b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis.

4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output

a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model

~ used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be orovided.

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to yes Sect 6 support review:

1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode.

2. Network wide average travel time.

3. Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume.

4. Total vehicles exiting the network.

S. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various Appendix 0 times (i.e.* at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes scenariO, identifying areas where long queues exist includino level of service (LOS) "EQ and LOS -F" conditions

Criterion Addressed In ETE Analysis Comments YesINo If they occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should Include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Sect 6 population. b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should Include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained. c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," yes Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002. d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of special facilities, transit dependent, and school o ulations. yes Sect 6 5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the traffic control plan used in the anal ysis should be provided. yes Sect 7 b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control Ian that affect the ETE should be provided. yes Sect 7 5.2 Enhancements In Evacuation Time a. The results of assessments for Improvement of evacuation time should be provided, yes Sect 7 b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of enhancements to local authorities should be provided, yes Sect 7 5.3 State and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with these agencies should be discussed. yes Sect 2.2 b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues that ma affect the ETE. no no unresolved issues 5.4 Reviews and Updates a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to be performed and submitted to the NRC. yes Sect 6.5 5.6 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers should be provided. yes Figure 4-1; Congregate care Is event specific and part of offsite plan Pa b. if return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate no not required Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE AnalYsis (YealNo) if theY occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time estimates for the General Public

a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Sect 6 DODulation.

b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained.

c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole,"

yes Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002.

d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of yes Sect 6 special facilities, transit dependent and school DODulations.

6.0 Other Considerations 6.1 DeveloDment of Traffic Control Plans

a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the Sect 7 traffic control plan used in the analvsis should be Drovided.

yes rp ~

b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control yes Sect 7 Dian that affect the ETE should be Drovided.

o 6.2 Enhancements In Evacuation Time

a. The results of assessments for Improvement of evacuation yes Sect 7 time should be provided.

b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of yes Sect 7 enhancements to local authorities should be orovided.

6.3 state and local Review

a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with yes Sect 2.2 these aaencies should be discussed.

b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues no no unresolved Issues that may affect the ETE.

6.4 Reviews and Updates

a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to be cerformed and submitted to the NRC.

yes SectS.S 6.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center

a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers yes Rgure 4*1; CQngregate care Is event specific and part Qf offsile plan should be provided.

b. If return trips are reQuired assumptions used to estimate no not reQuired

Criterion Addressed in ETE Analysis Common es/No) yes Sect 3.1.2 return times for buses should be provided. c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate buses to the con re ate care center. Exelon Technical Reviewer Date f tll)-3 Supervisory Review Date rp return times for buses should be orovided.

c.

It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate buses to the congregate care center. Exelon Technical Reviewer \\/,ilPlb; I f bt5AA

i9 Supervisory Review' Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) yes Sect 3.1.2 Date J /'1/13 Date

{UOr3 2012 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ETE Analysis Checklist 2012 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ETE Analysis Checklist

Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Oyster Creek Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) 1.0 Introduction a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area es S ct 1 2 should be described. y e b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ. c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1 "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002. 1.1 Approach a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Sect 4.3 provided. b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, yes Sect 21 3 large employers, and special events should be identified. c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control S t 2 1 fans in the analysis. es y ec d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be identified b name and version. yes Sect 5.5 e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be described. yes Sect 6.6 1.2 Assumptions a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions have been im plemented. b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1 -2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to support their use. 1.3 Scenario Development a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios. Table B*1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Oyster Creek Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis (yes/No) 1.0 Introduction

a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area yes Sect 1.2 should be described.

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of yes Figure 1-1. Figure 4-1 the site. including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.

c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1 "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002.

1.1 Approach

a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Sect 4.3 provided.

rp

b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, yes Sect. 2.1. 3 large em plovers and special events should be identified.

-a.

c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control yes Sect 2.1 plans in the analysis.

d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be yes Sect 5.5 identified by name and version.

e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be yes Sect 6.6 described.

1.2 Assumptions

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions have been implemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, uGeneral Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to sUfmort their use.

1.3 Scellario Development

a. The ten scenarios In Table 1-3. Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason should be provided for use of other scenarios.

yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in Se t, 6 4 develo ment of a staged evacuation. es y c 1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas yes Figure 1.1 (ERPAs) should be included. b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6-3 in each sector, c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be yes Table 6-2 provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations. 2.0 Demand Estimation a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ, transients special facilities and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Po utation a. The US Census should be the source of the population values, or another credible source should be provided. yes Sect 2.1, 3 b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE. c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the yes Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents. 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between I and 2 or justification should be provided for other values. yes Sect 3.1.1 b. Major employers should be listed. es Table A.1 2.1.2 Transient Population a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should be included, and peak and average attendance for these yes Sect 3.3, Table A.2 facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided. b. The average population during the season should be used, es Sect3.3 Criterion Addressed in Comments erE AnalYsis (Yes/No) 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in yes Sect 6.4 development of a staQed evacuation.

1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas

a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas yes Figure 1.1 (ERPAs) should be included.

b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6*3 in each sector.

c. A table similar to Table 1-4. "Evacuation Areas for a Staged yes Table 6-2 Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR*7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2. 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile arealS mile keyhole evacuations.

2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four

~ population groups. including permanent residents of the yes Table 3*1 thru 34 EPZ. transients special facilities, and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient PODulation

a. The US Census should be the source of the population yes Sect 2.1,3 values, or another credible source should be provided.

b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE.

c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1.

"Population by Sector." of NUREG/CR-7002. showing the population distribution for permanent residents. yes Figure 1-2 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles

s. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or yes Sect 3.1.1 justification should be provided for other values.

b. Major employers should be listed.

ves Table A.i 2.1.2 Transient Population

a. A list of facilities Which attract transient populations should yes Sect 3.3. Table A.2 be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of Information used to develop attendance values should be provided.

b. The average population during the season should be used Ives Sect3.3

Criterion Addressed in ETE Analysis Comments (Yes/No) itemized and totaled for each scenario. c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at facilities should be estimated. yes Sect 3.3 d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided. Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1, 3.3 values va should be provided. e. A sector diagram should be Included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient population. 2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit dependent. residents should be discussed. yes Sect 3.1.2 b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group should be quantified. yes Sect 3.1.2 c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent residents should be used in the anal ysis. yes Sect 3.1.2 d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs yes Sect 3.1.2 who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data, e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or yes Sect 3.1.2 justification should be provided for higher values. f. An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 programs were used in develo ping the estimate. g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuatior should be no Sect 5.3; Transportation Assistance phone numbers provided and the quantification of resources should be and pick up point information published for the public detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred. 2.3 Special Facility Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided, yes Table A.3, A,4, A.5 Special facility staff should be included in the total special Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analvsis

• IYeslNo) itemized and totaled for each scenario.

c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at yes Sect 3.3 facilities should be estimated.

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1. 3.3 values vary should be provided.

e. A sector diagram should be Included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient population.

2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents

a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit yes Sect 3.1.2 deoendent residents should be discussed.

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group yes Sect 3.1.2 should be Quantified.

c. The countyllocal evacuation plans for transit dependent yes Sect 3.1.2 residents should be used in the analvsis.

Z!

d. The methodology used to determine the number of people yes Sect 3.1.2 I

with disabilities and those with access and func:ional needs who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or yes Sect 3.1.2 justification should be provided for higher values.

f.

An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 proarams were used in developing the estimate.

g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, no Sect 5.3; Transportation Assistance phone numbers or other transport needed to support evacuatioJ"i should be provided and the quantification of resources should be and pick up point information published for the public detailed enough to assure double countina has not occurred.

2.3 Special Facility Residents

s. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided.

yes Table A3, A4, A5 Special facilitv staff should be included in the total special

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) facili population. b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data was obtained. yes Sect 3.4 c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should yes Table A.5 be rovided. d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided. yes Table A.5 e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and no Part of offsite agency planning process other correctional facilities) should be discussed when a ro riate.. 2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & A.3 the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided. b, Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools are based on 100% of the school capacity. yes Sect 3.4.2, Table A.3 c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3. POV adjustment n/a for the values used should be provided. d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessa ry. yes Sect 6.7 Table 6-6 p ecial Events 2.6.1 S a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event. b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient population should be analyzed in the ETE. no Sect 2.4.4 c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event should be estimated. no Sect 2.4.4 2.6.2 Shadow Evacuation a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP. b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. 1 yes 1 Figure 1-2 Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE AnalYsis (Yes/No) facilitv population.

b. A discussion should be provided an how special facility data yes Sect 3.4 was obtained.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should Table A.5 be provided.

yes

d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed yes TableA.5 to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided.

e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g.,

no Part of oftsite agency planning process medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and ather correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools

a. A list of schools including name, location, student yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & A.3 population. and transportation resources required to support the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be orovided.

~

b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools yes Sect 3.4.2, Table A.3 are based an 100% of the school capacity.

c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3. POV adjustment nla for the values used should be Drovided.

d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary.

Ives Sect6.7 Table6-6 2.6.1 Special Events

a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event.

b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient no Sect 2.4.4 population should be analvzed in the ETE.

c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event no Sect 2.4.4 should be estimated.

2.6.2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP.

b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to yes Figure 1-2 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector.

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis es/No c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes Sect 5 generated for the permanent resident population. 2.5.3 Background round and Pass Through Traffic a. The volume of background traffic and pass -through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios. b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped yes Sect 2.1 4.3 entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. 2.6 Summa of Demand Estimation a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total populations and total vehicles used In the analysis for yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario. 3.0 Roadway Capacl!y a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be Se t 4 discussed. es y c 3.1 Roadway Characteristics a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been yes Sect 4.1 conducted. b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used In the yes Sect 4.3

analysis, c.

A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway yes Appendix C of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided. Characteristics, d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should yes Appendix C be

rovided, e.

A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be yes Appendix C provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREGICR-7002. 3,2 Capacity Analysis a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the Eyes es Appendix C transportation network should be described in detail and Criterion Addressed In Comments ElE Analysis (Ve.lNo)

c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes SectS generated for the permanent resident Dopulation.

2.5.3 Background and Pass Throuah Traffic

a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios.

b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 enter/na the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification.

2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population. and pass-through demand used in each scenario.

3.0 Roadway Capacity ~

a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be yes Sect 4 discussed.

3.1 Roadway Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been yes Sect 4.1 conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used In the yes Sect 4.3 analvsis.

c. A table similar to that in Appendix A. "Roadway yes AppendixC Characteristics* of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided.

d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should yes AppendixC be provided.

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node yes AppendixC numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREGlCR-7002.

3.2 Capacitv Analvsis

a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the yes AppendixC transportation network should be described In detail and

Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis esiNo identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling. b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information no field information is not used should be used in the ETE calculation. 3.3 Intersection Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that Includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Appendix C unsi nalized si gnalized, or manned b res ponse personnel. b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume Intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length, and turn lane ueue ca acit. c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is used in the calculations. yes Sect 4.3 3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered. b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 yes Sect 2.4 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values. c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways, when applicable. no impediments are addressed in PAD process 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be identified. yes Sect 5 b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical yes Appendix 8 relevance should be provided. c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be summarized. yes Appendix 8 d. The trip generation time for each population group should be developed from site scific information. yes Sect 5 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Tri es Y Sect 5 OJ a., identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeline.

b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are unsianaJized signalized or manned by response personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume Intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle lenj:1th and turn lane Queue capacity.

c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is used In the calculations.

3.4 Adverse Weather

a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be considered.

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR*7002 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values.

c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways when applicable.

4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time

a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical relevance should be provided.

c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be summarized.

d. The trip generation time for each population group should be developed from site specific information.

4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at a/l times. Trio Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analvsis

• CYesiNol no field information is not used yes AppendixC yes Table 7-1 yes Sect 4.3 yes Sect 2.4 yes Sect 2.4 no impediments are addressed in PAD process yes SectS yes Appendix B yes Appendix B yes SectS yes SectS

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis YesiNo generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating. b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes Sect 5 difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds, c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially es S t 5 returning to hotels prior to evacuating. y ec d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sect 2.4,4 should be considered. e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the general public. 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they no Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities. offsite a enc lannin process b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating ambulato and non-ambulatory residents, yes Sect 5.3 c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency provided. planning process d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief Yes Sect 5.4.3 6 7 drivers and initiate the bus route are provided. e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus yes Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed. pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the pickug point. up point information published for the public f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load passengers should be discussed. yes Sect 6.7 A ma of bus routes should be Included, no Bus Information is published for the public h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special no Individual needs are part of offsite planning process vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuatina.

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used Sect 5 to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in camoorounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially yes Sect 5 return ina to hotels prior to evacuating.

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sect 2.4.4 should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the aeneral Dublic.

4.1.2 Transit Deoendent Residents ~

a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the no Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities.

offsite agency planning process

b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating yes Sect 5.3 I

ambulatory and non-ambulatorv residents.

c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency provided.

planning process

d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief yes Sect 5.4.3,6.7 drivers and initiate the bus route are provided.

e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed.

dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus yes pickup pOint. and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the oickup point. u~point information published for the public

f.

The number of bus stops and time needed to load Sect 6.7 passengers should be discussed. yes

g. A map of bus routes should be Included.

no Bus information is published for the public

h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents loadina time, no Individual needs are part of offsite planning process

Criterion Addressed in ETE Analysis Comments es/No and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided. i. Information should be provided to support analysis of return trips, if necessa yes Sect 6.7 4.1.3 Special Facilities a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be rovided. yes Sect 6.7 b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound speeds. yes Sect 6.7 c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes Table A.5; logistics part of offsite agency planning should be discussed. process d. Time for loading of residents should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A.5 trips are needed. f. If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should be provided. Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 Prior to bein evacuated to their final destination. h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips. yes Sect 6.7 4.1.4 Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be

rovided, yes Sect 6.7 b.

Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound seeds. yes Sect 6.7 c. Time for loading of students should be provided. es Sect 6.7 d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table 6-6, Table A.3 trips are needed. e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses should be provided. no Host Schools are part of offsite a enc lannin g y p g f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3, Schools evacuate directly to host schools pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis (yeslNo) and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided.

i.

Information should be provided to support analysis of return SectS.7 trips, if necessary. yes 4.1.3 Special Facilities

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times yes SectS.7 should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound yes SectS.7 speeds.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes Table A.5; logistics part of offsite agency planning should be discussed.

process

d. Time for loadina of residents should be provided.

Ives SectS.7

e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A.5 trips are needed.

f.

If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning be provided. no

g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility

~ residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination.

h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes Sect S.7 time elements for the return trips.

4.1.4 Schools

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times SectS.7 should be provided.

yes

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound yes SectS.7 speeds.

c. Time for loadino of students should be provided.

ves SectS.7

d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table 6-6, Table A.3 trips are needed.

e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses Host Schools are part of offsite agency planning should be provided.

no

f.

If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to pass through the reception center prior to beil19 evacuated yes Sect 5.4.3; Schools evacuate directly to host schools

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) to their final destination. g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips. yes Sect 6.7 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided yes Sect 5.5 and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate no traffic simulation utilized the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met as appropriate. 4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative yes Sect 5.5 set of model inputs should be provided. b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis. 4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be provided. b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review; yes Sect 6 1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode. 2. Network wide average travel time. 3. Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume. 4. Total vehicles exiting the network, 5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve Identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ. 6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ. c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes Appendix D scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service LOS "E" and LOS "F" conditions Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analvsis (Yes/No)- to their final destination.

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes Sect 6.7 time elements for the return trios.

4.2 ETE Modelina

a. General information about the model should be provided yes Sect 5.5 and demonstrates its use in ETE studies.

b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate no traffic simulation utilized the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met as aoorooriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input

a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative yes Sect 5.5 set of model inouts should be ofovided.

b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis.

4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output

a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model

~ used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be Drovided.

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to yes SectS support review:

1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode.

2. Network wide average travel time.

3.

Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume.

4. Total vehicles exiting the network.

5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve Identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

S. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (Le., at 2. 4. 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes Appendix 0 scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist includina level of service (LOS) "En and LOS "F" conditions.

Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Anal"is es/No if the occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Sect 6 o ulation. b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained. c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," yes Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002. d. ETES should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of Sect 6 special facilities transit dependent, and school populations. yes 5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the S ct 7 traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided. e y s e b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control Sect 7 Ian that affect the ETE should be provided. es y 5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation Sect 7 time should be p rovided. es y b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of Sect 7 enhancements to local authorities should be provided. es y 5.3 State and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with Sect 2 2 these agencies should be discussed. es y b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues no no unresolved isses that ma affect the ETE, 5.4 Reviews and Updates

a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to Se 5

t 6 be performed and submitted to the NRC. es y c 5.5 Rece tion Centers and Congregate Care Center

a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers yes Figure 4-1, Congregate care is event specific and part of offslte plan should be provided.

b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate no not re uired Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis "'"/No) if they occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public

a. The eTE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Sect 6 llopulation.

b. The erE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes SectS data should be explained.

c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs Similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole,*

yes SectS of NUREG/CR-7002.

d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of yes SectS special facilities transit dependent. and school populations.

5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans

a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the yes Sect 7 traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided.

r:p....

b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control yes Sect 7 plan that affect the ETE should be provided.

o 5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time

a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation yes Sect 7 time should be provided.

b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of yes Sect 1 enhancements to local authorities should be provided.

6.3 State and local Review

a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with yes Sect 2.2 these agencies should be discussed.

b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues no no unresolved isses that may affect the ETE.

6.4 Reviews and Updates

a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to y be performed and submitted to the NRC.

es SectS.S 5.5 Reception Centera and Congregate Care Center

a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers yes Figure 4*1; Congregate care Is event specific and part of offslte plan should be provided.

b. If return trips arel'equir~LCissumptions used to estimate no not requirec:t_~___._~_

.... _~

c. It should be clearly stated If it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate I yes buses to the congregate care center. Exelon Technical Reviewer Date (-, 1 13 Supervisory Review Date 'P return times for buses should be provided.

c.

It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate buses to llieQonareaate care center. /' Exelon I Technical Reviewer (, pe-I v """'A'. ~~,' Supervisory Review* " l Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (YeslNo) yes Sect 3.1.2 --... ---------.-----~-.---------.-.. - Date {1113 Date l ( rv/13 2012 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist 2012 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist

Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Peach Bottom Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis es/No 1.0 Introduction a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area should be described. yes Sect 1.2 b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ. c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002. 1.1 Approach a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Sect 4.3 provided. b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, large employers, and special events should be identified. yes Sect. 2.1, 3 c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control tans in the analysis. yes Sect 2.1 d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be identified by name and version. yes Sect 5.5 a. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be y J described. es Sect 6.6 1.2 Assumptions a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions have been im plemented. b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to support their use. 1.3 Scenario Development a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios. Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Peach Bottom Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) 1.0 Introduction

a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area yes Sect 1.2 should be described.

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4*1 the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.

c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison" of NUREG/CR*7002.

1.1 Approach

a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Sect 4.3 provided.

rp

b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, yes Sect. 2.1,3 large employers, and special events should be identified.

c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control yes Sect 2.1 plans in the analvsis.

d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be yes Sect 5.5 identified by name and version.

e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be yes SectS.S described.

1.2 Assumptions

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions have been implemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to support their use.

L 1.3 Scenario Development

a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes No "Special Evenf' see section 2.4.4 should be providj3<l for use of Q1hf3f l;Cf3J1E1fios-,_...

L

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis YeslNo 1.3.1 Sts ed Evacuation a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in sect 6 4 development of a staged evacuation. es y 1.4 Evacuation Plannin g Areas a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas yes Figure 1-1 ERPAs should be included. b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6-2 & 6-3 in each sector. c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be yes Table 6-2 & 6-3 provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations. 2.0 Demand Estimation a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ, transients, s pecial facilities, and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Po pulation a. The US Census should be the source of the population yes Sect 2.1, 3 values, or another credible source should be provided. b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE, c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the yes Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents. 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between I and 2 or Sect 3 1 1 justification should be provided for other values. es y b. Major employers should be listed. es Table A-1 2.1.2 Transient Population a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should be included, and peak and average attendance for these yes Sect 3.3, Table A-1 & A-3 facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develo attendance values should be provided. b. The average population during the season should be used, yes Sect 3.3 Criterion Addressed in Comments erE Analysis (Yes/No) 1.3.1 S~ed Evacuation

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in yes Sect 6.4 development of a staged evacuation.

1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas

a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas yes Figure 1-1 (ERPAs) should be included.

b. A table should be provided Identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6-2 & 6-3 in each sector.

c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged yes Table 6-2 & 6-3 Evacuation Keyhole,n of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5.

and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations. 2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four

~ population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ transients, special facilities and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. The US Census should be the source of the population yes Sect 2.1,3 I

values or another credible source should be Rrovided.

b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE.

c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1.

"Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002. showing the yes Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents. 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles

a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or yes Sect 3.1.1 justification should be provided for other values.

b. Major emplovers should be listed.

Ives TableA-1 2.1.2 Transient Population

a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should yes Sect 3.3, Table A-1 & A-3 be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided.

b. The averaruu>QQulation dlJril}gJhe season should be used

~ Sect 3.3

Criterion Addressed In ETE Analysis Comments (Yes/No) itemized and totaled for each scenario. c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at facilities should be estimated. yes Sect 3.3 d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided. Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1, 3.3 values va should be provided. e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient population. 2.2 Transit De pendent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit dependent residents should be discussed. yes Sect 3.1.2 b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group should be quantified. yes Sect 3.1.2 c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent residents should be used in the anal ysis. yes Sect 3.1.2 d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs yes Sect 3.1.2 who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data. e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or j yes Sect 3.1.2 ustification should be provided for higher values. f. An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 programs were used in developing the estimate. g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be no Sect 5.3; Transportation Assistance phone numbers provided and the quantification of resources should be and pick up point information published for the public detailed enough to assure double countin g has not occurred. 2.3 special Facili Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided. yes Table A-4 Special facility staff should be included in the total special Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE AnalYsis (Yes/No) itemized and totaled for each scenario.

c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at Sect 3.3 facilities should be estimated.

yes

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1,3.3 values varY should be Drovided.

e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient DODulation.

2.2 Transit OeDandent Permanent Residents

a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit yes Sect 3.1.2 dependent residents should be discussed.

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group yes Sect 3.1.2 should be Quantified.

c. The countyllocal evacuation plans for transit dependent Sect 3.1.2 residents shOUld be used in the analysis.

yes r:p

d. The methodology used to determine the number of people yes Sect 3.1.2 with disabilities and those with access and functional needs w

who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from 10caVcounty registration programs should be used In the estimate, but should not be the onlv set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or yes Sect 3.1.2 justification should be orovided for higher values.

f.

An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 proarams were used in developina the estimate.

g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, Sect 5.3; Transportation Assistance phone numbers or other transport needed to support evacuation should be no provided and the quantification of resources should be and pick up point information published for the public detailed enouah to assure double counting has not occurred.

2.3 Special Facllltv Residents

a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided.

yes TableA4 SDecial facility staff should be included in the total special

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis es/No facility population. b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data es Sect 3 4 was obtained. y c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should yes Table A-4 be provided. d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed yes Table A-4 to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided. a. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and no Part of offsite agency planning process other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & A-4 the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided. b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools Sect 3 4 2 are based on 100% of the school capacity, es y c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3. POV aa ustment n/a for the values used should be provided. d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessa yes Sect 6,7 Table 5-6 2.5.1 Special Events a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event. b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient S t 2 4 4 population should be analyzed in the ETE. no ec c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event 4 should be estimated. no t 2 S 4 ec 2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP. b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. yes Figure 1-2 Criterion AddreAed In Comments ETE Analysl, (yeslNo) facility population.

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data yes Sect 3.4 was obtained.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should yes TableA-4 be provided.

d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed yes TableA-4 to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided.

e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g.,

no Part of offsite agency planning process medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools

a. A list of schools including name, location, student yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & A-4 population, and transportation resources required to support the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided.

f

b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools yes Sect 3.4.2 are based on 100% of the school capacity.

c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3. POV aOjustment nla for the values used should be provided.

d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary.

'yes Sect 6.7 Table 6-6 2.5.1 Special Events

a. A complete list of special events should be provided and Includes information on the population, estimated duration, no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event.

b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient no Sect 2.4.4 population should be analyzed in the ETE.

c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event no Sect 2.4.4 should be estimated.

I 2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP.

b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to yes Figure 1-2 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector.

Criterion Addressed In ETE Analysis Comments Yes/No c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes sect 5 generated for the permanent resident population. 2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios. b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 2.6 Summa of Demand Estimation a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario. 3.0 Roadway Capacity a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be discussed. yes Sect 4 3.1 Roadway Characteristics a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been conducted. yes Sect 4.1 b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the yes Sect 4.3 analysis. c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway Characteristics of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided. yes Appendix C q d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should be provided. yes Appendix C e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be yes Appendix C provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002. 1 3.2 Capacity Analysis a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the transportation network should be described in detail and yes Appendix C Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analvsis -Nes/Nol-

c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes Sect 5 aenerated for the permanent resident population.

2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic

a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios.

b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification.

2.6 SummarY of Demand estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-throuah demand used in each scenario.

3.0 Roadway CaDacitv Z!

a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be yes Sect 4 discussed.

3.1 Roadwav Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been yes 5ect4.1 conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the yes 5ect4.3 analvsis.

c. A table Similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway yes AppendixC Characteristics

• of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided.

d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should yes AppendixC be provided.

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node yes AppendixC numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002.

3.2 Capacity Analysis

a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the yes AppendixC transportation network should be described in detail and

Criterion Addressed In ETE Analysis Comments Yes/No identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling, b. The capacity analysis Identifies where field information should be used in the ETE calculation. no field information is not used 3.3 Intersection Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Appendix C unsi nalized signalized, or manned by response personnel. b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume Intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length, and turn lane queue capacity. c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is used in the calculations. yes Sect 4.3 3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered. b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 yes Sect 2.4 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values. c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways, when applicable. no impediments are addressed in PAD p process 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be identified. yes Sect 5 b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical yes Appendix B relevance should be provided. c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be summarized. yes Appendix B d. The trip generation time for each population group should be developed from site specific information. yes Sect 5 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Po pulation a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Trip yes Sect 5 OJ c:>> identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling.

b. The capacity analysis Identifies where field information should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are unsignalized signalized or manned by response personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume Intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle length and turn lane Queue capacity.

c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is used in the calculations.

3.4 Adverse Weather

a. The adverse weather condition should be Identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be considered.

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values.

c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways when applicable.

4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time

a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey. number of participants. and statistical relevance should be provided.

c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be summarized.

d. The trip generation time for each population group should be developed from site specific information.

4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Trip Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) no field information is not used yes AppendixC yes Table 7-1 yes Sect 4.3 yes Sect 2.4 yes Sect 2.4 no impediments are addressed in PAD process yes Sect 5 yes Appendix 8 yes Appendix 8 yes Sect 5 yes Sect 5

.. ~-.------- ~-.---

Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis es/No generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating. b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes Sect 5 difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds. c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially returning to hotels prior to evacuating. yes Sect 5 d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sect 2.4.4 should be considered. e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the general public. 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they no Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities. offsite agency planning process b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating ambulatory and non-ambulato residents. yes Sect 5.3 c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency provided. planning process d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief drivers and initiate the bus route are provided. yes Sect 5.4.3, 6.7 e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit residents to prepare and then travel to a bus yes Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up pE' p points not addressed. pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the pickup point. up point information published for the public f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load passengers should be discussed. yes Sect 6.7 A map of bus routes should be included. no Bus information is published for the public h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special no Individual needs are part of offsite planning process vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, I Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analvsis (Yes/No) generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating.

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes SectS difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in camporounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially Sect 5 returning to hotels orior to evacuating.

yes

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sact 2.4.4 should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the oeneral public.

4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents ~

a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they no Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities.

oftsite agency planning process

b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating Sect 5.3 I

ambulatorv and non-ambulatorv residents. yes

c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency provided.

planning process

d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief drivers and initiate the bus route are provided.

yes Sect 5.4.3, 6.7

e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus yes Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed.

pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the pickup point. up point information published for the public

f.

The number of bus stops and time needed to load passengers should be discussed. yes Sect 6.7 ~. A map of bus routes should be included. no Bus information is published for the public

h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory parsons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special no Individual needs are part of off site planning process vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents loadino time

Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis esiNa and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided. i. Information should be provided to support analysis of return es Sect 6 7 trips, if necessary. y 4.1.3 Special Facilities a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times yes Sect 6.7 should be provided. b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound Sect 6 7 speeds. es y c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes Table A-4 ; logistics part of offsite agency planning should be discussed. d. Time for loading of residents should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed In a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A-4 tri s are needed. f. If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning be provided. g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination. h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the S 7 t 6 time elements for the return trips. es y ec 4.1.4 Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound speeds. yes Sect 6.7 c. Time for loading of students should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table A-4, Table 6-6 trips are needed. e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses should be provided. no Host Schools are part of offsite agency planning f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3; Schools evacuate directly to host schools ass through the reception center prior to being evacuated Criterion Addressed in Comments erE Analysis (VesINo) and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided. I. Information should be provided to support analysis of return Sect 6.7 trips if necessary. yes 4.1.3 Special Facilities

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times yes Sect 6.7 should be orovided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound yes Sect 6.7 I

speeds.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes Table A-4 ; logistics part of offsite agency planning should be discussed.

d. Time for loading of residents should be orovided.

ves SectS.7

e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A-4 trips are needed.

f.

If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning be provided. no

g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility

~ residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination.

h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes Sect 6.7 time elements for the return trips.

4.1.4 Schools

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times yes SectS.7 should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound yes Sect 6.7 speeds.

c. Time for loadino of students should be orav/ded.

ves Sect 6.7

d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table A-4, Table 6-6 trips are needed.

e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses no Host Schools are part of offsite agency planning should be provided.

f.

If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3; Schools evacuate directly to host schools pass through the receotion center orior to be/no evacuated

Criterion Addressed in ETE Analysis Comments (Yes/No) to their final destination. g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips. yes Sect 6.7 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. yes Sect 5.5 b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate N/A traffic simulation utilized the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate. 4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model In put a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative set of model inputs should be provided. yes Sect 5.5 b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis. 4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be provided. b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review; yes Sect 6 1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode. 2. Network wide average travel time. 3. Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume. 4. Total vehicles exiting the network. 5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ. 6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ. c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes Appendix D scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service LOS "E" and LOS "F" conditions, Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) to their final destination.

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes Sect 6.7 time elements for the return trips.

4.2 ETE Modellna

a. General information about the model should be provided yes Sect 5.5 and demonstrates its use in ETE studies.

b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE N/A calculation. sufficient detail should be provided to validate traffic simulation utilized the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met. as appropriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input

a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative yes Sect 5.5 set of model inputs should be provided.

b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analvsis.

4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output

a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model

~ used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be provided.

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to yes Sect 6 support review:

1.

Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode.

2.

Network wide average travel time.

3.

Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume.

4. Total vehicles exiting the network.

5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for varioLls times (Le., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes Appendix 0 scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist

~c/!Jding levelQf servicEt (LOS) "E" ~and LOS MF" conditions.

Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis Yes1No if they occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Sect 6 o ulation. b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained. c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," yes Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002. d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of Sect 6 special facilities, transit dependent, and school populations. yes 6.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the Sect 7 traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided. yes b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control Sect 7 Ian that affect the ETE should be provided. s ye 5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation Sect 7 time should be provided. es y b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of yes Sect 7 enhancements to local authorities should be provided. 5.3 State and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with Sect 2 2 these agencies should be discussed. e y s b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues no no unresolved issues that may affect the ETE. 5.4 Reviews and Updates a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to Sect 6 5 be performed and submitted to the NRC. s ye 5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers yes Figure 4-1; Congregate care is event specific and part of offsite plan should be provided b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate no not re uired Criterion Addressed In Comments ErE Analysis (VeslNo) if they occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public

s. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes SectS population.

b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained.

c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole,*

yes Sects of NUREG/CR-7002.

d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of yes Sects special facilities transit dependent and school populations.

6.0 Other Considerations 6.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans

a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the yes Sect 7 traffic control plan used in the analysis should be orovided.

~

b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control yes Sect 7 plan that affect the ETE should be provided.

o 6.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time

a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation yes Sect 7 time should be provided.

b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of yes Sect 7 enhancements to local authorities should be provided.

5.3 State and Local Review

a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with yes Sect 2.2 these agencies should be discussed.

b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues no unresolved issues i

that may affect the ETE. no 6.4 Reviews and Updates

a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to be performed and submitted to the NRC.

yes SectS.5 6.6 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center

a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers yes Figure 4~ 1; Congregate care is event specifiC and part of offsite plan should be provided.

b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate no not reauired

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis es/No return times for buses should be provided. c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate yes Sect 3.1.2 buses to the congregate care center. Exelon Technical Reviewer 13 Supervisory Review 'T ` `° Date I (.J( ' r:p.... return times for buses should be provided.

c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate buses to the conareaate care center.

Exelon Technical Reviewer.... ly*~~-_. ' ~ Y""I'E.< *. A",3 ~ r' Supervisory Review v'~ Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis tveslNo) yes Sect 3.1.2 I Date 1/1/13 Date ,( lot.J 2012 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist 2012 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station ETE Analysis Checklist

Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Quad Cities Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) 1.0 introduction a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area Sect 1 2 should be described. es y b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ. c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002. 1.1 Approach a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Section 4.3 provided. b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, es Y Sect. 2.1 3 e large employers, and special events should be identified. c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control Sect 2 1 plans in the analysis. es y d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be Sect 5 5 identified by name and version. es y e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be Se t 6 6 described. es y c 1.2 Assumptions a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions have been implemented. b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to support their use. 1.3 Scenario Development a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios. Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Quad Cities yes I Sect 1.2

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of yes I Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.

c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes I Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Com arison" of NUREG/CR-7002.

A roach A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained yes Section 4.3 OJ ~ 1......,."'.t""'t..o."-I"'\\I"\\I.o.,.~ _""" ~".o.,..ii"!.1.o.\\I.o.n+roo rooh". II"" h.o. i"l.o.n+i+..o."! I yes Sect. 2.1, 3 I.....

c.

....,I~""',."....,...,._II.,;rIIV"""""..,"'"...,.""...,_11.. ",,\\,.11 _II "'..., __ I LI.... III"'",",VIILIVI yes I Sect 2.1

d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be I Sect 5.5 and version.

yes

e. MethodS used to address data u.. ~~.* ~"... ~v v ** ~u.u ~~

I yes I Sect 6.6

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective

/yes I Sect 2.1,3,5.4 actions have been im~lemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and

/yes I Sect 2.1 include the basis to su~~ort their use.

cenario Develo~ment

a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason

/yes I No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios.

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in Sect 6 4 development of a staged evacuation. yes 1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas es Figure 1 1 (ERPAs) should be included. y b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6-2 in each sector. c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Table 6-3 Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be yes provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations. 2.0 Demand Estimation a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. The US Census should be the source of the population yes Sect 2.1, 3 values, or another credible source should be provided. b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE. c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the yes Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents. 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or Sect 3 1 1 justification should be provided for other values. yes b. Major employers should be listed. yes Table A-1 2.1.2 Transient Population a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should yes Table A-2 and A-3 Sect 3.3 be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided. b. The average population during the season should be used, yes Sect 3.3 Sect 6.4 response planning areas I yes 'yau IJV" 1I1\\.1IUUvU. Figure 1.1

b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction I yes in each sector.

Table 6-2

c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be I yes Table 6-3 provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile areaJ5 mile keyhole evacuations.

mand Estimation nand estimation should be developed for the four OJ .. lulation groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 I N Z.1 permanent ReSidents and TranSient PO ulatton

a. The US Census should be the source of the population values, or another credible source should be rovided.

yes Sect 2.1, 3

b. Population values should be adiusted as necessary for ETE. yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent

c.

Figure 1-2 Sect 3.1.1

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/Nod itemized and totaled for each scenario. c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at Sect 3 3 facilities should be estimated. es y d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided. Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1, 3.3 values vary should be provided. e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient population. 2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit yes Sect 3.1.2 dependent residents should be discussed. b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group yes Sect 3.1.2 should be quantified. c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent yes Sect 3.1.2 residents should be used in the analysis. d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs yes Sect 3.1.2 who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data. e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or yes Sect 3.1.2 justification should be provided for higher values. f. An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 programs were used in developing the estimate. g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be no Sect 5.3 provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred. 2.3 Special Facility Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided. yes Table A-4, A-5, A-6 Special facility staff should be included in the total special

c.

I Ilv I.. f\\.... ',,",vi I.. VI '"'11,..... 11_1110. * """'IUVI......, """""""'1 I Iv","".. V I Sect 3.3 facilities should be estimated. yes

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

I Sect 2.1,3.3 yes

e.

yes I Table 3-2 I to determine the number of transit I yes I Sect 3.1.2 should be discussed.

b. Transoortation resources needed to evacu~....,.. "'" l::I'V"

yes I Sect 3.1.2

c.

I he countv/local evacuation plans for transit dependent I Sect 3.1.2 be used in the anal~sis yes

d. The methodology used to determine the.. _... __. _..-__.-._

I yes I Sect 3.1.2 OJ I with disabilities and those with access and functional needs I (..) who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from 10caVcounty registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the onl~ set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation*

resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or I yes I Sect 3.1.2 ustification should be ~rovided for higher values. An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration I yes I Sect 3.1.2 ~rograms were used in develooinq the estimate.

g. A summary table of the ____... _... __. _. _____, _... __._.. ___, I no I Sect 5.3 or other transport needed to support evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred.

Sl!eclal Facility Residents

a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided.

I yes I Table A-4, A-5, A-6 staff should be included in the total

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No facility population. b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data Sect 3 4 was obtained. es y c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should Table A-4 be provided. es y d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed yes Table A-4 to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided. e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and no Part of offsite agency planning process other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & Table A-5 the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided. b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools Se t 3 4 2 are based on 100% of the school capacity. es y c c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3. Adjustment for personal vehicles - N/A for the values used should be provided. d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary. yes Sect 6.7 2.5.1 Special Events a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event. b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient no Sect 2 4 4 population should be analyzed in the ETE. c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event no Sect 2 4 4 should be estimated. 2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP. b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. yes Figure 1-2 OJ J:,.. l.C2fJC2l1ILY of vehicles needed Id be orovided.

e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g.,

medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when

a.

and season of the event.

b. The soecial event that encomoasses the peak transient ETE.

c. The oercent of oermanent residents attending the event I

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles from the NPP.

b. Population estimates for the shadow ~.~~~~ *. ~" ".*,,~,~.~

15 mile area beyond the EPZ are.... r.... ";rI"'rI h" "",,,+....r yes Sect 3.4 yes Table A-4 yes TableA-4 no Part of offsite agency planning process Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & Table A-5 Sect 3.4.2 Sect 3. Adjustment for personal vehicles - N/A no I Sect 2.4.4 no I Sect 2.4.4 Ino I Sect 2.4.4 \\ yes I Figure 1-2 I yes I Figure 1-2

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes&No c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes Sect 5 generated for the permanent resident population. 2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traff ic a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios. b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped yes Sect 2.1 4.3 enterin the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario. 3.0 Roadwgy Capacity a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be Sect 4 discussed. es y 3.1 Roadway Characteristics a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been yes Sect 4.1 conducted. b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the yes Sect 4.3 analysis. c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway yes Appendix C Characteristics, of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided. d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should yes Appendix C be provided. e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be yes Appendix C provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002. 3.2 CapacIW Analysis a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the yes Appendix C transportation network should be described in detail and rp 01

c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time enerated for the permanent resident population.

2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic

a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may be reduced for niahttime scenarios.

b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped enterina the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification.

2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and ass-throuah demand used in each scenario.

3.0 Roadwav Capaci

a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be discussed.

3.1 Roadwav Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the analvsis.

c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway Characteristics," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided.

d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should be provided.

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002.

3.2 Caoacitv Analvsis

a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the transportation network should be described in detail and yes Sect 5 yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 yes Sect 4 yes Sect 4.1 yes Sect 4.3 yes Appendix C yes Appendix C yes Appendix C yes Appendix C

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) identifies factors that are exp ressly used in the modeling. b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information no Field information is not used should be used in the ETE calculation. 3.3 Intersection Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Appendix C unsignalized, sig nalized, or manned by response personnel. b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length, and turn lane queue capacity. c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is Sect 4 3 used in the calculations. yes 3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered. b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 yes Sect 2.4 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values. c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on no Impediments are addressed in PAD process streets and driveways, when applicable. 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be Sect 5 identified. es y b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical yes Appendix B relevance should be provided. c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be yes Appendix B summarized. d. The trip generation time for each population group should be Sect 5 developed from site specific information. yes 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their Sect 5 homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Tri es y OJ m identifies factors that are exoresslv used in the modelin

b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are unsianalized, signalized, or manned bv resoonse oersonnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle lenath, and turn lane aueue caoacitv.

c.

Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is used in the calculations. 3.4 Adverse Weather

a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be considered.

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values.

c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways, when aoolicable.

4.0 DeveloDment of Evacuation Times 4.1 TrlD Generation Time no yes yes yes yes yes no

a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be I identified.

yes

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical I yes relevance should be orovided.

c.

Data obtained from telephone surveys should be I summarized. yes

d. The trip generation time for each population group should be I develooed from site soecific information.

yes 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient PODuJatlon

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their I

homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Tri" yes Field information is not used AppendixC Table 7-1 Sect 4.3 Sect 2.4 Sect 2.4 Impediments are addressed in PAD process SectS Appendix B Appendix B SectS SectS

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes]No generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating. b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used Sect 5 to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds. c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially Sect 5 returning to hotels prior to evacuating. yes d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sect 2.4.4 should be considered. e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the general public. 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the no Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities. offsite agency planning process b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating yes Sect 5.3 ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents. c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency provided. planning process d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief yes Sect 5.4.3, 6.7 drivers and initiate the bus route are provided. e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit yes Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed. dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the pickup point. up point information published for the public. f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load yes Sect 6.7 passengers should be discussed. A map of bus routes should be included. no Bus information is published r the public. h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special no Individual needs are part of offsite planning process vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, OJ .!..J generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home orior to evacuatina.

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in camoarounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially returnina to hotels orior to evacuatina.

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network with the qeneral oublic.

4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents yes yes no yes

a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they I no should have been agreed upon by the responsible authorities.

b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating ambulatorv and non-ambulatorv residents.

c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are rovided.

d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief drivers and initiate the bus route are orovided.

e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to the oickuo ooint.

f.

The number of bus stops and time needed to load assenaers should be discussed. A mao of bus routes should be included. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, yes no yes yes yes no no Sect 5 SectS Sect 2.4.4 SectS Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick up point information published for the public. Part of offsite agency planning process Sect 5.3 Transportation resources are part of offsite agency planning process Sect 5.4.3,6.7 Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed. Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick up point information published for the oublic. Sect 6.7 Bus information is oublished for the oublic. Individual needs are part of offsite planning process

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided. i. Information should be provided to support analysis of return 7 Sect 6 trips, if necessary. yes 4.1.3 Special Facilities a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times Sect 6 7 should be provided. yes b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound Sect 6 7 speeds. yes c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes Table A-6; logistics part of offsite agency planning should be discussed. d. Time for loading of residents should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A.6 trips are needed. f. If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning be provided. g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination. h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the Sect 6 7 time elements for the return trips. yes 4.1.4 Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times 7 Sect 6 should be provided. yes b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound 7 Sect 6 speeds. yes c. Time for loading of students should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table A.4 trips are needed. e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning should be provided. f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3 pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated OJ I co

i.

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound speeds.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents should be discussed.

d. Time for loadina of residents should be provided.

e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trips are needed.

f.

If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should be provided.

g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center rior to beina evacuated to their final destination.

h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips.

4.1.4 Schools

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound speeds.

c. Time for load ina of students should be provided.

d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trips are needed.

e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses should be provided.

f.

If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to ass throuah the reception center prior to beino evacuated yes Sect 6.7 yes Sect 6.7 yes Sect 6.7 yes Table A-6; logistics part of offsite agency planning es Sect 6.7 yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A.6 no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning yes Sect 5.4.3 yes Sect 6.7 yes Sect 6.7 yes Sect 6.7 es Sect 6.7 yes TableA.4 no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning yes Sect 5.4.3

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No to their final destination. g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes Sect 6.7 time elements for the return trips. 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided yes Sect 5.5 and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE N/A Traffic Simulation utilized calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate. 4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative yes Sect 5.5 set of model inputs should be provided. b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis. 4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be provided. b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to Sect 6 support review: yes 1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode. 2. Network wide average travel time. 3. Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume. 4. Total vehicles exiting the network. 5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ. 6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ. c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various Appendix D times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation es y scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service (LOS) "E" and LOS "F" conditions,

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes Sect 6.7 time elements for the return tri s.

ETE Modelln ~.t""'t.n.t""'t.r~1 i....fI"\\M"n~+il"\\... ~h,.\\1I+ +h.o. n"\\l"\\rI.o.1 l"'"hnl.1r1 h.o. t"\\rn\\.lin.o.r1 yes Sect 5.5 I' L-I L-.;IILUUlv".

b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE N/A I Traffic Simulation utilized calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as c Simulation Modelln~ut and a representative I yes I Sect 5.5 yes page v I

t~ut A discussion regarding whether the traffic simUlation model OJ used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE I yes I Sect 5.5 I (0 should be I?rovided.

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to I support review:

yes I Sect 6

1.

Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode.

2.

Network wide average travel time.

3.

Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume.

4.

Total vehicles exiting the network.

5.

A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

6.

Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c.

Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various I yes I Appendix D times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist level of service (LOS) "E" and LOS "F"

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analtesis _ (Yes/No) if they occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Sect 6 population. b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained. c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," yes Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002. d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of Sect 6 special facilities, transit dependent, and school populations. yes 5.0 Other Considerations 6.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the Sect 7 traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided. yes b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control Sect 7 Ian that affect the ETE should be provided. yes 5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation Sect 7 time should be provided. yes b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of Sect 7 enhancements to local authorities should be provided. yes 5.3 State and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with 2 Sect 2 these agencies should be discussed. yes b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues no No unresolved issues that may affect the ETE. 5.4 Reviews and Updates a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to 5 Sect 6 be performed and submitted to the NRC. yes 5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers Figure 4-1 should be provided. yes b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate no Not required

a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient I yes I Sect 6 ulation.

b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated I yes 1 Sect 6 data should be ex~lained.

c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," I yes 1 Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002.

d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of yes 1 Sect 6 yes I

Sect 7 OJ I -- ~---------.. -- --.1-------.. -- -- ---_._---- --... -.-_... - --... --- Iyes I nl'!':lln +h"=ll+ '!':IIffo,...t +ho ~T~ ~hnl.J'" h.o. nrn\\lirl.o.'" Sect 7 0 ""._....,.M.'V~ **,'ir ** ~ ***... ~vu.... 'v **

• 1,.UiijiJ I'"

ThQ rQ~1 lite:: ",f !:Iic::c::oc::e:rYlontc:: fnr irnnrn\\lornont "f O\\l'!':ll""II'!':11tinn 1 yes Sect 7 yes Sect 7 yes Sect 2.2 no No unresolved issues Sect 6.5 Figure 4-1

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Anal sis (Yes/No) return times for buses should be provided. c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate yes Sect 3.1.2 buses to the congregate care center. Technical Reviewer,1 \\^J -N_ Date \\ /2z/\\3 Supervisory Review / (^^ Date 1-23-0 OJ I ~ ~ return times for buses should be orovided.

c.

It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate buses to the conoreoate care center. yes Technical Reviewer ~ "-- ~ '-T Supervisory Review JL aM Sect 3.1.2 Date '\\ / '2'2.. / \\ 3, Date I J 3 0 2012 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station ETE Analysis Checklist 0 2012 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station ETE Analysis Checklist

Table 8-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Thy ee Mile Island Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No 1.0 Introduction a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area yes Sect 1.2 should be described. b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4-1 features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ. c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002. 1.1 Approach, a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Sect 4.3 provided. b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, yes Sect. 2.1, 3 large employers, and special events should be identified. c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control S t 2 1 plans in the analysis. yes ec d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be Sect 5 5 identified by name and version. es y e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be Sect 6 6 described. s ye 1.2 Assumptions a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1, 3, 5.4 actions have been implemented. b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREGICR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to su pport their use. 1.3 Scenario Development a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 should be provided for use of other scenarios. Table B*1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Three Mile Island Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analvsis (VeslNo) 1,0 Introduction

a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area yes Sect 1.2 should be described.

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of yes Figure 1-1, Figure 4*1 the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.

c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002.

1,1 Approach

a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Sect 4.3 provided.

r::p

b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, yes Sect. 2.1,3 large employers and special events should be identified.

c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control yes Sect 2.1 plans in the analysis.

d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be yes SectS.S identified by name and version.

e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be yes SectS.S described.

1.2 Assu,,!p..tlons

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 2.1. 3, 5.4 actions have been implemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions,* of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to support their use.

1.3 Scenario Development

a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes No "Special Event" see section 2.4.4 I

should be provided for use of other scenarios.

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis YesINo 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in development of a staged evacuation. yes Sect 6.4 1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas ERPAs should be included. yes Figure 1-1 b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6-3 in each sector. c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be yes Table 6-2 provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations. 2.0 Demand Estimation a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ transients special facilities and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. The US Census should be the source of the population values, or another credible source should be provided. yes Sect 2.1, 3 b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for growth to reflect o ulation estimates to the year of the ETE. yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the yes Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents. 2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or justification should be provided for other values. yes Sect 3.1.1 b. Major employers should be listed. yes Table Al 2.1.2 Transient Population a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should be included, and peak and average attendance for these yes Sect 3.3, Table A2 & A3 facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided. b. The average population during the season should be used yes Sect 3.3 Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analvsis IVesJNo) 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in yes Sect 6.4 development of a staged evacuation.

1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas

a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas yes Figure 1*1 (ERPAs) should be Included.

b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 6*3 in each sector.

c. A table similar to Table 1-4. "Evacuation Areas for a Staged yes Table 6-2 Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2,5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/S mile keyhole evacuations.

2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four

~ popUlation groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 EPZ transients special facilities and schools. 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient PODulatlon

a. The US Census should be the source of the population yes Sect 2.1.3 values or another credible source should be provided.

b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE.

c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1,

• Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the yes Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents.

2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles

a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or yes Sect 3.1.1 justification should be provided for other values.

b. Maior employers should be listed.

ves TableA1 2.1.2 Transient Population

a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should yes Sect 3.3, Table A2 & A3 be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided.

b. The average population during the season should be used, Ives Sect 3.3

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No itemized and totaled for each scenario. c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at facilities should be estimated. yes Sect 3.3 d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided. Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1, 3.3 values vary should be provided. a. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Table 3-2 the transient population. 2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit dependent residents should be discussed. yes Sect 3 1 2 b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group should be quantified. yes Sect 3.1.2 c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent residents should be used in the analysis. yes Sect 3.1.2 d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs yes Sect 3.1.2 who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided, Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data, e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or j yes Sect 3.1.2 ustification should be provided for higher values. f. An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 programs were used in developing the estimate. g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be no Sect 5.3; Transportation Assistance phone numbers provided and the quantification of resources should be and pick up point information published for the public detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred. 2.3 Special Facility Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided. yes Table AS thru A6 Special facility staff should be included in the total s pecial O:J W itemized and totaled for each scenario.

c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at facilities should be estimated.

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why values vary should be provided.

e. A sector diagram should be included. similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR*7002, showing the population distribution for the transient population.

2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents

a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit dependent residents should be discussed.

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group should be Quantified.

c. The countyllocal evacuation plans for transit dependent residents should be used in the analysis.

d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from 10caVcounty registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the onlv set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or justification should be orovided for higher values.

f.

An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration programs were used in develooing the estimate.

g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enouah to assure double counting has not occurred.

2.3 Special Facility Residents

a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided.

Special facility staff should be included in the total special Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analvsls (YeS/No} yes Sect 3.3 yes Sect 2.1.3.3 yes Table 3*2 yes Sect 3.1.2 yes Sect 3.1.2 yes Sect 3.1.2 l yes Sect 3.1.2 yes Sect 3.1.2 yes Sect 3.1.2 no Sect 5.3; Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick up point information published for the public yes Table A3 thru A6

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis es/No facili population. b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data was obtained. yes Sect 3.4 c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided. yes Table AS d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed to support the evacuation of the facili should be provided. yes Table A6 e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and no Part of offsite agency planning process other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support y Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & A4 .4.2, the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided. b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools are based on 100% of the school capacity. yes Sect 3.4.2 c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3, POV adjustment n/a for the values used should be provided. d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessa yes Sect 6.7, Table 6-6 2.5.1 Special Events a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event. b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient population should be analyzed in the ETE. no Sect 2.4.4 c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event should be estimated. no Sect 2.4.4 2.6.2 Shadow Evacuation a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP. b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. yes Figure 1 2 Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE AnalYsis (,(fiINO) facility population.

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data yes Sect 3.4 was obtained.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should yes Table AS be provided.

d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed yes TableA6 to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided.

e. The logistiCS for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g.*

no Part of offsite agency planning process medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate. 2.4 Schools

a. A list of schools including name, location, student yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3*3 & A4 population. and transportation resources required to support the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided.

cc.

b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools yes Sect 3.4.2 are based on 100% of the school capacity.

c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3. POV adjustment nla for the values used should be provided.

d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary.

rves Sect 6.7. Table 6-6 2.5.1 S"pecial Events

a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population. estimated duration.

no Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event.

b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient no Sect 2.4.4 population should be analyzed in the ETE.

c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event no Sect 2.4.4 should be estimated.

2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 from the NPP.

b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to yes Figure 1-2 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are j:!rovided b~ sector.

~

Criterion Addressed In Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes Sect 5 generated for the permanent resident population. 2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 be reduced for ni httime scenarios. b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for yes Table 3-1 thru 3-5 permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario. 3.0 Roadway Capacity a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be discussed. yes Sect 4 3.1 Roadway Characteristics a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been conducted. yes Sect 4.1 b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of Information gathered and used In the yes Sect 4.3 analysis. c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway Characteristics," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided. Yes Appendix C d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should be provided. yes Appendix C e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be yes Appendix C provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002. 3.2 Ca acl Analysis a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the transportation network should be described in detail and yes Appendix C Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analvsis (YeS/No)

c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes Sect 5 generated for the permanent resident population.

2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic

a. The volume of background traffic and pass-through traffic should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1,4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios.

b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped yes Sect 2.1, 4.3 entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification.

2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total yes Table 3-1 thru 3-5 I

populations and total veh ieles used in the analysis for permanent residents, transients, transit dependent reSidents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-throuah demand used in each scenario. 3.0 Roadwav Capacity ~

a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be yes Sect 4 discussed.

3.1 Roadwav Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been yes Sect 4.1 conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of Information gathered and used in the yes Sect 4.3 analYSis.

c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, 'Roadway yes AppendixC Characteristics," of NUREG/CR*7002 should be provided.

d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should yes Appendix C be provided.

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node yes AppendixC numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1. "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002.

3.2 Capacity Analvsis

a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the yes AppendixC transportiiltion network should be dest::ribed in detail and

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling. b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information no field information is not used should be used in the ETE calculation. 3.3 Intersection Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Appendix C unsi nalized signalized, or manned by response personnel. b, Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length, and turn lane queue capacity. c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is yes Sect 4.3 used in the calculations. 3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered. b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors, of NUREG/CR-7002 yes Sect 2.4 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values. c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways, when applicable. no impediments are addressed in PAD process 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be Sect 5 identified. es y b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical yes Appendix B relevance should be provided. c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be yes Appendix B summarized. d. The trip generation time for each population group should be Sect 5 developed from site specific information. es y 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Tri es y Sect 5 Criterion Addressed in Comments erE Analysis tYes/No) identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling.

b. The capacity analysiS identifies where field information no field information is not used should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Appendix C unsignalized signalized or manned by response personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length and turn lane Queue capacity.

c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is Sect 4.3 used in the calculations.

yes 3.4 Adverse Weather

a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered.

~

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table yes Sect 2.4 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values.

c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on no impediments are addressed in PAD process streets and driveways, when applicable.

4.0 Development of Evacuation Timn 4.1 Trip Generation Time

a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be yes SectS identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used. the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical yes Appendix B relevance should be provided.

c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be Appendix B summarized.

yes

d. The trip generation time for each population group should be yes SectS developed from site specific information.

4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their Sect S homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Trip yes

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis Yes/No generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating. b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes Sect 5 difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on takes or in campgrounds. c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially Sect 5 returning to hotels prior to evacuating. es y d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sect 2.4.4 should be considered, e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the general public. 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they no Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities. offsite agency planning process b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating yes Sect 5.3 ambulatory and non-ambulato residents. c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency provided. planning process d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief yes Sect 5 4 3 6.7 drivers and initiate the bus route are provided. e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus yes Sect 6,7; Trans to pick up points not addressed. pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the pickup point. up point information published for the public f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load yes Sect 6.7 passengers should be discussed. A map of bus routes should be included. no Bus information is published for the public h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special no Individual needs are part of offsite planning process vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, Criterion Addressed in Comments erE Analysis (Yes/No) generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating.

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used Sect 5 to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially yes Sect 5 returning to hotels prior to evacuatinQ.

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected no Sect 2.4.4 should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population should I

be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the oenersl public. 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents r:p

a. If available, existing plans and bus routes are used in the Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they no should have been agreed upon by the responsible up point information published for the public. Part of authorities.

offsite agency planning process

b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating ambulatorv and non-ambulatorv residents.

yes Sect 5.3

c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are no Transportation resources are part of offsite agency provided.

planning process

d. Logistical details. such as the time to obtain buses, brief drivers and initiate the bus route are Drovided.

yes Sect 5.4.3. 6.7

e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus yes Sect 6.7; Trans to pick up points not addressed.

pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to Transportation Assistance phone numbers and pick the DickuD ooint. up point information published for the Dublic

f.

The number of bus stops and time needed to load oassengers should be discussed. yes Sect 6.7

g. A mao of bus routes should be included.

no Bus information is published for the DubUc

h. The trip generation time for nonwambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special vehicles time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, no Individual needs are part of offsite planning process

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided. I. Information should be provided to support analysis of return trips, if necessary. yes Sect 6.7 4.1.3 S eciai Facilities a. information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times yes Sect 6 7 should be provided. b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound speeds. yes Sect 6.7 c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes Table A6 ; logistics part of offsite agency planning should be discussed. d. Time for loading of residents should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A6 tri s are needed. f. If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should be provided. no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination. h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips. yes Sect 6.7 4.1.4 Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound s s eeds. ye Sect 6.7 c. Time for loading of students should be provided. yes Sect 6.7 d. information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed In a single trip or if additional yes Table A4, Table 6-6 tops are needed. e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses should be provided. no Host Schools are part of offsite agency planning f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3; Schools evacuate directly to host schools ass through the reception center prior to being evacuated Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided.

i.

Information should be provided to support analysis of return yes Sect 6.7 trips, if necessary. 4.1.3 Special Facilities

a. Information on evacuation logistiCS and mobilization times yes Sect 6.7 should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound yes SectS.7 speeds.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should Table A6 ; logistics part of offsite agency planning be provided, and the logistiCS of evacuating these residents yes should be discussed.

d. Time for loading of residents should be provided.

.yes Sect 6.7

e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 5.4.3, Table A6 trips are needed.

f.

If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should no Host facilities are part of offsite agency planning be provided.

g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility

~ residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination.

h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes Sect 6.7 time elements for the return trips.

4.1.4 Schools

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times yes SectS.7 should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound yes SectS.7 speeds.

c. Time for loading of students should be provided.

yes Sect 6.7

d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Table A4. Table 6-6 trips are needed.

e. If return trips are needed. the destination of school buses no Host Schools are part of offsite agency planning should be provided.

f.

If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3; Schools evacuate directly to host schools p~!;s through the reception center prior to being evacuated

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis YesINo to their final destination. g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes Sect 6.7 time elements for the return trips. 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided yes Sect 5.5 and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE no traffic simulation utilized calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate. 4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative yes Sect 5.5 set of model in uts should be provided, b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis. 4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be rovided. b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to Sect 6 support review: yes 1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode. 2. Network wide average travel time. 3, Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume. 4. Total vehicles exiting the network. 5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ. 6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ. c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various Appendix D times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service (LOS) "E" and LOS "F" conditions, Criterion Addressed in Comments erE Analysis (VeS/No) to their final destination.

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the yes Sect 6.7 time elements for the return trips.

4.2 ETE Modeling

a. General information about the model should be provided yes Sect 5.5 and demonstrates its use in ETE studies.

b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE traffic simulation utilized calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate no the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met as appropriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input

a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative yes Sect 5.5 set of model inputs should be provided.

b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analYsis.

4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output

a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simUlation model

~ used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be provided.

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to yes Sect 6 support review:

1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode.

2. Network wide average travel time.

3, Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume.

4. Total vehicles exiting the network.

5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (i.e.* at 2,4,6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes Appendix 0 scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service (LOS) "E" and LOS "F" conditions,

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis es/No if they occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Sect 6 o ulation. b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained. c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," yes Sect 6 of NUREG/CR-7002. d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of Sect 6 special facilities, transit dependent, and school populations. es y 5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the Sect 7 traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided. es y b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control Sect 7 plan that affect the ETE should be provided. es y 5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation Sect 7 time should be provided. e y s b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of Sect 7 enhancements to local authorities should be provided. es y 5.3 State and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with yes Sect 2.2 these agencies should be discussed. b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues no no unresolved issues that may affect the ETE. 5.4 Reviews and Updates a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to Sect 6 5 be performed and submitted to the NRC. es y 5.5 Reception Centers and Con gregate Care Center a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers yes Figure 4-1, Congregate care is event specific and part of offsite plan should be provided. b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate no not required Criterion Addressed in Comments erE AnalYsis . (Yaa!No) if they occur. 4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public

a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes SectS population.

b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Sect 6 data should be explained.

c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3. "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole,"

yes SectS of NUREG/CR-7002.

d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of SectS special facilities transit deDendent and school DODulations.

yes 5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans

a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the Sect 7 traffic control Dian used in the analvsis should be Drovided.

yes I rp

b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control yes Sect 7 plan that affect the ETE should be provided.

o 5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time

a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation yes Sect 7 time should be provided.

b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of yes Sect 7 enhancements to local authorities should be Drovided.

5.3 State and Local Review

a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of Interaction with yes Sect 2.2 these alleneias should be discussed.

b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues no no unresolved issues that may affect the ETE.

5.4 Reviews and Updataa

a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to be performed and submitted to the NRC.

yes Sect 6.5 5.5 Reception Centers and Con~re~ate Care Center

a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers yes Figure 4-1; Congregate care is event specific and part of offsite plan should be Drovided.

Q. If retljrn triP~Cl[Eilrl3~uired assumptions used to estimate no not reauired

Criterion Addressed In ETE Analysis (Yes/No) yes Sect 3.1.2 Comments return times for buses should be provided. c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate buses to theconcireaate carecenter. Exelon Technical Reviewer Date.,.. Supervisory Review -`T. Date I 'I t r:p return times for buses should be provided.

c. It should be clearly stated if it Is assumed that passengers are left at the reception center and are taken by separate buses to the conoreQate care center.

~ ,I Supervisory Review ~ Criterion Addressed in Commenbi ETE Analysis (Yes/No) yes Sect 3.1.2 -~ Dale +1 \\0, Date t ( l i) (.~}}