|
---|
Category:Legal-Exhibit
MONTHYEARML15337A3522015-11-17017 November 2015 Official Exhibit - NYS000582-00-BD01 - Diagram of Strength Vs Amplitude by Dr. Richard T. Lahey ML15337A3372015-11-11011 November 2015 Official Exhibit - ENTR00726-00-BD01 - Track 2 Hearing Exhibit List ML15337A3322015-11-0505 November 2015 Official Exhibit - ENT000726-00-BD01 - Entergy Track 2 Hearing Exhibit List ML15337A3352015-11-0505 November 2015 Official Exhibit - RIVR14001-00-BD01 - Riverkeeper Tailored Track 2 Exhibit List ML15337A3362015-11-0505 November 2015 Official Exhibit - NRCR10001-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Track 2 Exhibit List ML15337A3332015-11-0404 November 2015 Official Exhibit - NYSR25001-00-BD01 - NYS Revised Tailored Exhibits List Relevant to Track 2 Contentions ML15337A3312015-11-0303 November 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000230-00-BD01 - Corrections to Prefiled Testimony NRC000168 and NRC000197 ML15337A3262015-10-29029 October 2015 Official Exhibit - ENT000722-00-BD01 - Supplemental Testimony of Entergy Witnesses Nelson Azevedo, Timothy Griesbach & Randy Lott ML15337A3292015-10-29029 October 2015 Official Exhibit - ENTR16001-00-BD01 - Entergy Revised Exhibit List ML15337A3242015-09-23023 September 2015 Official Exhibit - NYS000576-00-BD01 - Pre-Filed Supplemental Testimony of Richard T. Lahey Re Contentions NYS-25, NYS-26B/RK-TC-1B & NYS-38/RK-TC-5 ML15337A3072015-09-0909 September 2015 Official Exhibit - NYS000573-PUB-00-BD01 - Supplemental Reply Statement of Position of the State of New York and Riverkeeper, Inc. in Support of Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5 (Public, Redacted) (September 9, 2015) ML15337A2962015-09-0909 September 2015 Official Exhibit - NYS000570-PUB-00-BD01 - Supplemental Reply Statement of Position of the State of New York and Riverkeeper, Inc. in Support of Contention NYS-26B/RK-TC-1B (Public, Redacted) (September 9, 2015) ML15337A2832015-09-0909 September 2015 Official Exhibit - NYS000563-00-BD01 - Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) Systems, USNRC Technical Training Center, Reactor Concepts Manual, Pages 4-1 to 4-28 ML15337A2952015-09-0909 September 2015 Official Exhibit - NYS000569-PUB-00-BD01 - Pre-filed Supplemental Reply Testimony of Richard T. Lahey, Jr. in Support of Contention NYS-26B/RK-TC-1B (Public, Redacted) (September 9, 2015) ML15337A2942015-09-0909 September 2015 Official Exhibit - NYS000568-PUB-00-BD01 - Supplemental Reply Statement of Position of the State of New York in Support of Contention NYS-25 (Public, Redacted) (September 9, 2015) ML15337A2932015-09-0909 September 2015 Official Exhibit - NYS000567-PUB-00-BD01 - Pre-filed Supplemental Reply Testimony of Richard T. Lahey, Jr. in Support of Contention NYS-25 (Public, Redacted) (September 9, 2015) ML15337A3042015-09-0909 September 2015 Official Exhibit - NYS000571-PUB-00-BD01 - Pre-filed Supplemental Reply Testimony of David J. Duquette in Support of Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5 (Public, Redacted) (September 9, 2015) ML15337A2972015-09-0909 September 2015 Official Exhibit - RIV000164-00-BD01 - NUREG-1740, ACRS, Voltage-Based Alternative Repair Criteria: a Report to the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards by the Ad Hoc Subcommittee on a Differing Professional Opinion (2001) ML15337A3062015-09-0909 September 2015 Official Exhibit - NYS000572-PUB-00-BD01 - Pre-filed Supplemental Reply Testimony of Richard T. Lahey, Jr. in Support of Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5 (Public, Redacted) (September 9, 2015) ML15337A2822015-09-0909 September 2015 Official Exhibit - NYS000566-00-BD01 - Figure 1 for Supplemental Reply Testimony of Dr. Richard T. Lahey ML15337A3142015-09-0404 September 2015 Official Exhibit - ENTR00615-PUB-00-BD01 - Entergy'S Statement of Position Re Contention NYS-25 (Embrittlement) - Redacted ML15334A2842015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - ENT000687-00-BD01 - NRC, Safety Evaluation Report, Topical Report on ASME Section III Piping and Component Fatigue Analysis Utilizing the Westems Computer Code (WCAP-17577, Revision 2) (Undated) ML15335A2932015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRCR00104-00-BD01 - on Yee Statement of Professional Qualifications (Revised) ML15337A2642015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000196-PUB-00-BD01 - NRC Staff'S Initial Statement of Position on Contention NYS-25 (Reactor Vessel Internals) ML15337A3192015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - ENT000698-PUB-00-BD01 - Entergy'S Revised Statement of Position Regarding Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5(Safety Commitments) (Aug. 10, 2015)Redacted ML15337A3202015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - ENT000699-PUB-00-BD01 - Redacted Revised Testimony of Entergy Witnesses Nelson Azevedo, Robert Dolansky, Alan Cox, Jack Strosnider, Timothy Griesbach, Barry Gordon, Randy Lott, and Mark Gray Regarding Contention NYS-38/RK ML15337A3172015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - ENT000678-PUB-00-BD01 - NL-07-140, Letter from F. Dacimo, Entergy, to NRC Document Control Desk, ?Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Application? (Nov. 28, 2007)Redacted ML15337A2652015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000197-PUB-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Testimony of Dr. Allen Hiser, Jeffrey Poehler, and Gary Stevens on NYS-25 and NYS-38/RK-TC-5 ML15337A2412015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRCR00147-00-BD01 - NRC Staff'S Revised Statement of Position on State of New York and Riverkeeper'S Joint Contention NYS-38/RK-TC5 (Revised) ML15335A2902015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000222-00-BD01 - IP3 FSAR Rev. 04 Chapter 3 (2011) (Excerpt) ML15334A2632015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - ENT000648-00-BD01 - M. Mitchell, Chief, Vessels and Internals Integrity Branch, Response to Non-Concurrence Regarding Safety Evaluation for Topical Report MRP-227 Pressurized Water Reactor Internals Inspection and Evaluat ML15337A2622015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000228-00-BD01 - Indian Point Unit 2 Technical Specifications 3.1.4 ML15337A2452015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000227-00-BD01 - Gary Stevens Statement of Professional Qualifications ML15337A2632015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000229-00-BD01 - Indian Point, Unit 3 Technical Specifications 3.1.4 ML15335A2192015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - ENTR00031-00-BD01 - Curriculum Vitae of Alan B. Cox ML15335A2112015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - ENTR20186-00-BD01 - Curriculum Vitae of Mark A. Gray ML15337A3162015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - ENT000616-PUB-00-BD01 - Testimony of Entergy Witnesses Nelson F. Azevedo, Robert J. Dolansky, Alan B. Cox, Jack R. Strosnider, Timothy J. Griesbach, Randy G. Lott, and Mark A. Gray Regarding Contention NYS-25 (Embrittleme ML15337A2782015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000168-PUB-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Testimony of Dr. Allen Hiser, Dr. Ching Ng, Mr. Gary Stevens, P.E., and Mr. on Yee, Concerning Contentions NYS-26B/RK-TC-1B and NYS-38/RK-TC-5 ML15337A2712015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000223-00-BD01 - IP3 FSAR Rev. 04 Chapter 14 (2011) ML15337A2592015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000224-00-BD01 - IP3 FSAR Rev. 04 Chapter 16 ML15337A2442015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRCR00161-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Testimony of Dr. Allen L. Hiser and Mr. Kenneth J. Karwoski Concerning Portions of State of New York and Riverkeeper, Inc. Joint Contention NYS-38/RK-TC5 (Revised) ML15334A2822015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - ENT000680-00-BD01 - Curriculum Vitae of Barry M. Gordon ML15335A2912015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRCR00118-00-BD01 - Indian Point Unit 3 Technical Specifications (Excerpt) (Revised) ML15334A2282015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - ENT000634-00-BD01 - Entergy, IP2, FSAR Update, Revision 25 (2014) (Excerpts) ML15335A2822015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000220-00-BD01 - Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group (PWROG) Presentation Slides, Industry and NRC Coordination Meeting Materials Programs Technical Exchange: Clevis Insert Bolt Update, (June 2014) ML15337A2692015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000169-00-BD01 - NRC000169 - Indian Point, Unit 2 Technical Specifications (Excerpt) ML15337A2602015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000226-00-BD01 - Jeffrey C. Poehler Statement of Professional Qualifications ML15335A2732015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000183-00-BD01 - NRC Inspection Manual, Inspection Procedure 71013, Site Inspection for Plants with a Timely Renewal Application (Sept. 25, 2013) ML15335A2202015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - ENTR00184-00-BD01 - Curriculum Vitae of Jack R. Strosnider ML15335A3012015-08-10010 August 2015 Official Exhibit - NRC000206-00-BD01 - Indian Point, Unit 2, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Rev. 25, Chapter 14 - Safety Analysis (2014) 2015-09-09
[Table view] |
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
In the Matter of:
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)
ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 ENT000290
Docket #: 05000247 l 05000286 Submitted: March 29, 2012 Exhibit #: ENT000290-00-BD01 Identified: 10/15/2012 Admitted: 10/15/2012 Withdrawn:
Rejected: Stricken:
Other:
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 2, 2004 NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2004-13 CONSIDERATION OF SHELTERING IN LICENSEES RANGE OF
PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS
ADDRESSEES
All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
INTENT
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this regulatory issue summary (RIS)
to clarify the regulatory requirement that licensees develop a range of protective actions that includes sheltering for the public in the plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). This RIS requires no action or written response on the part of addressees.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Section 50.47(b)(10) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) states in part that licensees are to develop a range of protective actions for the public in the plume exposure pathway EPZ. In addition, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) states that in developing this range of protective actions, consideration is to be given to sheltering, and that the guidelines for the choice of protective actions be consistent with Federal guidance.
Following an inspection at Point Beach in August 2003 (ML040360104), the NRC staff performed a review of licensee emergency plans, implementing procedures, and notification forms to evaluate the extent licensees considered sheltering when recommending protective actions to offsite organizations. During the review, the NRC staff has noticed that licensee emergency plans, implementing procedures and notification forms consider sheltering in one of three ways: (1) sheltering as an alternative to evacuation (shelter rather than evacuate),
(2) sheltering as a supplement to evacuation (evacuate downwind sectors and shelter the remaining sectors until further instructions are provided), and (3) sheltering is not considered by the licensee. The NRC staff has also noticed that some licensees have addressed sheltering inconsistently in their emergency plan, implementing procedures, and notification forms. For example, sheltering is considered as an alternative to evacuation in the emergency plan, but it is not included as an option in the implementing procedures or on the notification form.
DISCUSSION
The decision to recommend a protective action involves a judgment in which the radiation dose avoidance provided by the protective action is weighed in the context of the risks involved in taking the action. Since the decision will most likely be made under emergency conditions, considerable planning is necessary to reduce the complexity of decisions required to effectively protect the public at the time of an emergency.
Plant conditions are the major determining factors in developing early protective action recommendations. To be most effective, protective actions (evacuation or shelter) need to be taken before or shortly after the start of a major radioactive release to the atmosphere.
According to the original version of Appendix 1, Emergency Action Level Guidelines for Nuclear Power Plants, in NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, the initial protective action for a General Emergency is to shelter the population close to the plant while considering the advisability of evacuation. The guidance in the original version of Appendix 1 further states that if core damage is in progress and containment failure is judged to be imminent, shelter should be recommended for people in those areas that cannot be evacuated before the plume arrives. Although the original guidance was never intended to imply that the appropriate initial protective action for severe accidents was to only shelter the population that is near the plant, it was not explicit on this point.
Subsequently, portions of Appendix 1 were revised in Supplement 3 Criteria for Protective Action Recommendations for Severe Accidents, to NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants. Revised Appendix 1 states that for a General Emergency, the preferred initial protective action is to evacuate immediately about two miles in all directions from the plant and about five miles downwind, unless other conditions make evacuation dangerous. Note 5 to Figure 1, Severe Damage or Loss of Control of Facility Public Protective Actions, in Supplement 3, states that sheltering may be the appropriate action for controlled releases of radioactive material from the containment, if there is assurance that the release is short term (puff release) and the area near the plant cannot be evacuated before the plume arrives.
10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) requires that the consideration of sheltering be included in the range of protective action recommendations consistent with Federal guidance. In addition to the Federal guidance discussed above, EPA 400-R-92-001, Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear Accidents (EPA 400), dated May 1992, also contains information on evacuation and sheltering. Section 5.5.3, General Guidance for Evacuation and Sheltering, states that the process of evaluating, recommending, and implementing evacuation or shelter for the public is far from an exact science, particularly in view of time constraints that prevent thorough analysis at the time of an emergency. The effectiveness of evacuation and shelter can be improved considerably by planning and testing. Also, EPA 400 states that sheltering may be appropriate (when available) for areas not designated for immediate evacuation because: 1) it positions the public to receive additional instructions; and 2) it may provide protection equal to or greater than evacuation.
SUMMARY OF ISSUE
The NRC staff has identified a generic misinterpretation of the regulatory requirement to include sheltering in a licensee's range of protective action recommendations (PARs) consistent with Federal guidance. The NRC staff has found that some emergency plans specifically state that the licensee will provide only evacuation as a PAR. In those cases, the appropriate protective action recommendation consistent with Federal guidance may not be made to State and/or local authorities. Even if the licensee has established an understanding with State and local authorities not to recommend a sheltering protective action, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) still requires that sheltering be considered in developing the range of protective action recommendations in the licensee's emergency plan.
Federal guidance states that sheltering may be the appropriate action for controlled releases of radioactive material from the containment, if there is assurance that the release is short term (puff release) and the area near the plant cannot be evacuated before the plume arrives.
Federal guidance also states that sheltering may be appropriate (when available) for areas not designated for immediate evacuation because: 1) it positions the public to receive additional instructions; and 2) it may provide protection equal to or greater than evacuation. Additionally, a licensee's emergency plan, implementing procedures, and notification forms need to include the consideration of sheltering consistent with Federal guidance.
BACKFIT DISCUSSION
This RIS clarifies the regulatory requirements in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10) related to the need for licensees to develop a range of protective actions (including sheltering) for the public in the plume exposure pathway EPZ. This RIS does not impose new or modified staff requirements or uniquely prescribe a way to comply with the regulations, or require any action or written response. Therefore, this RIS does not constitute a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109 and the staff did not perform a backfit analysis.
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION
A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the Federal Register because this RIS is informational and pertains to a staff position that does not represent a departure from current regulatory practice.
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT
This RIS does not request any information collections and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact Robert Kahler by telephone or by e-mail at the numbers listed below.
/RA/
Terrence Reis, Acting Chief Reactor Operations Branch Division of Inspection Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical Contact:
Robert Kahler, NSIR
(301) 415-2992 Email: rek@nrc.gov Attachment: List of Recently Issued Regulatory Issue Summaries
Attachment LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARIES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Regulatory Issue Date of Summary No. Subject Issuance Issued to
____________________________________________________________________________________
2004-12 Clarification on Use of Later 07/28/2004 All holders of operating licenses Editions and Addenda to the for nuclear power reactors except ASME OM Code and Section XI those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
2003-18, Use of Nuclear Energy INSTITUTE 07/13/2004 All holders of operating licenses Supplement 1 (NEI) 99-01, Methodology for for nuclear power reactors and Development of Emergency Action licensees that have permanently Levels, Revision 4, Dated January ceased operations and have
2003 certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
2004-11 Supporting Information Associated 06/29/2004 All submitters of proprietary with Requests For Withholding information to the Nuclear Proprietary Information Regulatory Commission.
2004-10 Preparation And Scheduling of 06/14/2004 All holders of operating licenses Operator Licensing Examinations for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
2004-09 Status on Deferral of Active 06/07/2004 All holders of materials licenses for Regulation of Ground-water uranium and thorium recovery Protection At In Situ Leach facilities.
Uranium Extraction Facilities
2004-08 Results of the License Termination 05/28/2004 All holders of operating licenses Rule Analysis for nuclear power reactors, research and test reactors, as well as decommissioning sites.
Note: NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:
To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following command in the message portion:
subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname
______________________________________________________________________________________
OL = Operating License CP = Construction Permit
|
---|
|
list | | | Topic |
---|
RIS 2004-01, Withdrawn NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-001: Method for Estimating Effective Dose Equivalent from External Radiation Sources Using Two Dosimeters | 17 February 2004 | Deep Dose Equivalent Backfit | RIS 2004-01, Withdrawn NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-001: Method For Estimating Effective Dose Equivalent From External Radiation Sources Using Two Dosimeters | 17 February 2004 | Deep Dose Equivalent Backfit | RIS 2004-02, Deferral of Active Regulation of Ground-Water Protection at in Situ Leach Uranium Extraction Facilities | 23 February 2004 | | RIS 2004-02, Deferral of Active Regulation of Ground-Water Protection At In Situ Leach Uranium Extraction Facilities | 23 February 2004 | | RIS 2004-03, NRC Regulatory Issues Summary (RIS) 2004-03, Revision 1: Risk-Informed Approach for Post-Fire Safe-Shutdown Circuit Inspection (Formerly RIS 2004-003) | 29 December 2004 | Hot Short Safe Shutdown Enforcement Discretion Multiple Spurious Operation Significance Determination Process Thermoset Fire Protection Program Backfit | RIS 2004-04, Use of Code Cases N-588, N-640, and N-641 in Developing Pressure-Temperature Operating Limits | 5 April 2004 | Hydrostatic Backfit | RIS 2004-05, Grid Reliability and the Impact on Plant Risk and the Operability of Offsite Power | 15 April 2004 | Safe Shutdown Anticipated operational occurrence Contingency analyzer Backfit | RIS 2004-06, Independent Survey of Power Reactor Licensees | 16 April 2004 | Backfit | RIS 2004-07, Release of Final Standard (RS)-002, Processing Applications for Early Site Permits. | 19 May 2004 | Backfit | RIS 2004-09, Status on Deferral of Active Regulation of Ground-Water Protection at In Situ Leach Uranium Extraction Facilities | 7 June 2004 | | RIS 2004-09, Status on Deferral of Active Regulation of Ground-Water Protection at in Situ Leach Uranium Extraction Facilities | 7 June 2004 | | RIS 2004-10, Withdrawn NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-010: Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations | 14 June 2004 | Generic Fundamentals Examination Backfit | RIS 2004-11, Support Information Associated with Requests for Withholding Proprietary Information | 29 June 2004 | Backfit Affidavit | RIS 2004-13, Consideration Of Sheltering In Licensee'S Range Of Protective Action Recommendations | 2 August 2004 10 March 2005 | Backfit | RIS 2004-13, Consideration of Sheltering in Licensee'S Range of Protective Action Recommendations | 2 August 2004 | Backfit | RIS 2004-13, Official Exhibit - ENT000290-00-BD01 - NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-13 Consideration of Sheltering in Licensee'S Range of Protective Action Recommendations | 2 August 2004 | Backfit | RIS 2004-13, Entergy Pre-Filed Evidentiary Hearing Exhibit Ent000290, NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-13 Consideration Of Sheltering In Licensee'S Range Of Protective Action Recommendations | 2 August 2004 | Backfit | RIS 2004-14, Focusing Resources in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation As a Result of Review of Security Plan Changes | 20 September 2004 | Backfit | RIS 2004-14, Focusing Resources in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation as a Result of Review of Security Plan Changes | 20 September 2004 | Backfit | RIS 2004-16, Draft RAI, Extend the First Period of the Fourth 10-year Inservice Inspection Interval | 16 May 2007 | | RIS 2004-17, NRC Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2004-17, Revision 1, Decay-In-Storage Provisions for the Storage of Radioactive Waste Containing Byproduct Material | 27 September 2005 | Fire Barrier RAMQC Hemyc License Renewal Brachytherapy | RIS 2004-17, Revised Decay-in-Storage Provisions for the Storage of Radioactive Waste Containing Byproduct Material | 23 November 2004 | License Renewal | RIS 2004-18, Expiration Date for 10 CFR Part 71 Quality Assurance Program Plan Approvals. | 1 December 2004 | Backfit | RIS 2004-20, Examples of Recurring Requests for Additional Information (Rais) for 10 CFR Part 71 and 72 Applications | 4 May 2007 | Backfit TheraSphere |
|
---|