RBG-46220, Submittal of Fitness-for-Duty Program Six-Month Performance Data Report
| ML040340415 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 01/30/2004 |
| From: | Lorfing D Entergy Operations |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| G1.51, G9.5, RBF1-04-0018, RBG-46220 | |
| Download: ML040340415 (5) | |
Text
v Entergy Entergy Operations, Inc.
River Bend Station 5485 U. S. Highway 61 N St. Francisville, LA 70775 Fax 225 635 5068 January 30, 2004 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 River Bend Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Six-Month Performance Data Report File No.:
G9.5, G1.51 RBG-46220 RBF1 0018 Gentlemen:
Pursuant to 10CFR26.71 (d), "Recordkeeping requirements," enclosed is River Bend Station's Fitness-for-Duty (FFD) Six-Month Program Performance Data Report for the report period July 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003. This report contains statistical data and trend analysis compiled by the Fitness-for-Duty Department.
Should you have any questions regarding the attached, please contact Ms. Dee Childress at (225) 381-3655 or Mr. Bill Fountain of my staff at (225) 381-4625.
Sincerely, David N. Lorfing, Manager - Licensing (Acting)
DNL/MJF enclosure r-\\,
49
River Bend Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Six-Month Performance Data Report RBG-46220 Page 2 of 2 cc:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Resident Inspector (w/o)
P. 0. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Mr. Michael K. Webb, NRR Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission M/S OWFN / 7D-1 Washington, DC 20555
r Enclosure to RBG-46220 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10CFR26 Entergy Operations, Inc.
Company River Bend Station Location 12/31/2003 6 Months Ending Peggy Crow Contact Name (225) 381-4795 Phone (Include Area Code)
Cutoffs:
Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Screen / Confirmation 50 / 15 Amphetamines 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 300 / 300 Alcohol (%BAC) o Appendix A 1000 / 500 25 I 25 0.04%
to 10CFR26 N/A N/A N/A l
Licensee Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Employees Contractor Contractor Personnel Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access 713 N/A 213 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 21 0/0 N/A N/A 63 1/0 For-Cause (Post accident) 1 0/0 N / A N / A 0
0/0 Random 250 1/0 N/A N/A 55 0/0 Follow-Up 4
0/0 N/A N/A 0
0/0 Other 0
0/0 N/A N/A 0
0/0 Total 276 1/0 N/A N/A 118 1/0 Page 1 of 3
Enclosure to RBG-46220 BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES July - December 2003 Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol Refusal 1
2 3
4 5
to Test Licensee 0
1 0
0 0
0 Employees N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Long-Term Contractor N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N N/A N/A N/A N
/A 1
Short-Term Contractor 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
N/A N/A 1
N/A N/A N/A Total 0
0 0
0 0
IN/A N/AIN/A IN/A N/A Page 2 of 3
Enclosure to RBG-46220 Fitness for Duty Program Six Month Performance Report July - December 2003 PROGRAM
SUMMARY
The River Bend Station annual random testing rate is 50 percent. During this reporting period, approximately 32.9 percent of the population has been randomly tested. The rate of positive tests from random testing is 0.33 percent. The total random percentage for the year is 51.6 percent.
POSITIVE RESULTS:
During pre-access screening one contract employee tested positive for alcohol, and during random testing one Licensee employee tested positive for cocaine.
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS:
Access was denied for the contract employee who tested positive for alcohol.
Management was notified and the individual's file was annotated to reflect the positive results and actions taken.
The Licensee employee who tested positive for cocaine was evaluated through the company Employee Assistance Program (EAP) and placed on a follow-up program for two consecutive years.
EVENTS REPORTED TO THE NRC:
During this reporting period, there were no violations of the fitness for duty program that were reportable.
PROGRAM EVALUATION:
No programmatic problems were identified during this reporting period.
Page 3 of 3