RBG-45993, Fitness-for-Duty Program Six-Month Performance Data Report
| ML022190222 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 08/01/2002 |
| From: | King R Entergy Operations |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RBF1-02-0124, RBG-45993 | |
| Download: ML022190222 (5) | |
Text
Entergy Operations. Inc.
Rive, BýrcSý
)i 5,485 U.S Higr-*,,'ay 6' F
Bo1 22D S-Fa-cisv,,e LA 7q-75 t En tei Tel 336 6225 Fa:25635 5068 Rick J. King
- J,
r[,:3t r
,e August 1, 2002 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 River Bend Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Six-Month Performance Data Report File No.:
G9.5, G1.51 RBG-45993 RBF1-02-0124 Gentlemen:
Pursuant to 10CFR26.71 (d), "Recordkeeping requirements," enclosed is River Bend Station's Fitness-for-Duty (FFD) Six-Month Program Performance Data Report for the report period January 1, 2002, through June 30, 2002. This report contains statistical data and trend analysis compiled by the Fitness-for-Duty Department. We have reviewed this data and determined that no programmatic weaknesses exist.
Should you have any questions regarding the attached, please contact Ms. Dee Childress at (225) 381-3655 or Mr. Bill Fountain of my staff at (225) 381-4625.
Sincerely, RJK/WJF enclosure
River Bend Station Fitness-For-Duty Program Six-Month Performance Data Report RBG-45993 Page 2 of 2 cc:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Resident Inspector P. 0. Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Mr. Michael K. Webb, NRR Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission M/S OWFN-7 D1 Washington, DC 20555
Enclosure to RBG-45993 Page 1 of 3 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10CFR26 Entergy - Nuclear South June 30, 2002 Company 6 Months Ending River Bend Station, 5485 Hwy 61, St. Francisville, LA 70775 Location Dee Childress, Supervisor - AA/FFD/Medical, River Bend/Waterford 3 Contact Name (225) 381-3655 Phone (Include Area Code)
Screen / Confirmation 50 / 15 300 / 150 300 / 300 SAppendix A to 10CFR26 Amphetamines 1000 / 500 Phencyclidine 25 / 25 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04%
Cutoffs:
Marijuana Cocaine Opiates N/A N/A N/A
/
/
/
Licensee Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Employees Contractor Contractor Personnel Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 40 0
N/A N/A 89 1/0 For-Cause (Post accident) 2 0
N IA N /A 1
0 For-Cause (Behavior) 0 0
N/A N/A 1
0 Random 208 0
N/A N/A 38 0/1 Follow-Up 0
0 N/A N/A 0
0 Other 0
0 N/A N/A 0
0 Total 250 0
N/A N/A 129 1/1
Enclosure to RBG-45993 Page 2 of 3 BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES January 1, 2002, to June 30, 2002 Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol Refusal 1
2 3
4 5
to Test Licensee Employees 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Long-Term Contractor N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Short-Term E*nntrn~tnr 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Conrato
- 1.
0vv 0
Total 10 0
0 0
0 N/A N/A N/A IN/A jN/A j 27
Enclosure to RBG-45993 Page 3 of 3 River Bend Station Fitness-for-Duty Six Month Performance Data Report January 1, 2002, to June 30, 2002 PROGRAM
SUMMARY
The RBS annual random testing rate is 50 percent. During this reporting period, approximately 27.9 percent of the population has been randomly tested. The rate of positive tests from random testing is 0.41 percent.
POSITIVE RESULTS:
One contract employee tested positive for amphetamines during pre-access screening and one contract employee tested positive for marijuana on a random test.
Two licensee employees and two contract employees tested negative on for-cause tests (3-post accident I 1-behavior).
MANAGEMENT ACTIONS:
Access was denied for both contract employees who tested positive for marijuana and amphetamines.
Management was notified and their individual files were annotated to reflect the positive results and the actions taken.
No employees participated in the follow-up program during this reporting period.
EVENTS REPORTED TO THE NRC:
During this reporting period, there were no violations of the fitness for duty program that were reportable.
PROGRAM EVALUATION:
No programmatic problems were identified during this reporting period.