|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter type:NRC
MONTHYEARNRC-2017-0211, Comment (162) of Leigh Defreece Opposing the Continued Use of Thin-Walled Canisters for Waste Storage at the SONGS Site2018-03-20020 March 2018
Comment (162) of Leigh Defreece Opposing the Continued Use of Thin-Walled Canisters for Waste Storage at the SONGS Site
NRC-2015-0023, Comment (3) by Olivia Batchelder on NRC-2015-0023 Re San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 & 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation2015-04-0101 April 2015
Comment (3) by Olivia Batchelder on NRC-2015-0023 Re San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 & 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
NRC-2014-0223, Comment (27) of Patricia Borchmann on Funding Deficiencies, Per Reg. 10-CFR 50.54(bb)) - San Onofre SONGS 2 & 3; Multiple Technical Gaps, Substantive Deficiencies in SCE Edison'S Proposed Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report2015-01-13013 January 2015
Comment (27) of Patricia Borchmann on Funding Deficiencies, Per Reg. 10-CFR 50.54(bb)) - San Onofre SONGS 2 & 3; Multiple Technical Gaps, Substantive Deficiencies in SCE Edison'S Proposed Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (Psd
NRC-2013-0088, Comment (96) of Andrea Tomcsanyi Opposing the Re-licensing of San Onofre, Unit 22013-05-14014 May 2013
Comment (96) of Andrea Tomcsanyi Opposing the Re-licensing of San Onofre, Unit 2
NRC-2011-0148, Comment (45) of Lisa Lloyd on Behalf Us Dept of Interior on Supplement to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for In-Situ Leach Uranium Milling Facilities, Crook County, Wyoming2013-05-13013 May 2013
Comment (45) of Lisa Lloyd on Behalf Us Dept of Interior on Supplement to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for In-Situ Leach Uranium Milling Facilities, Crook County, Wyoming
NRC-2013-0070, Comment (591) of 100 Individuals Opposing Restart of San Onofre, Unit 2, Until NRC Completes Comprehensive Investigation2013-05-0606 May 2013
Comment (591) of 100 Individuals Opposing Restart of San Onofre, Unit 2, Until NRC Completes Comprehensive Investigation
NRC-2012-0070, Comment (325) of Armando Esparza on Behalf of Southern California District Council of Laborers Supporting Southern California Edison'S License Amendment Request for the Relicensing of San Onofre, Unit 22013-05-0202 May 2013
Comment (325) of Armando Esparza on Behalf of Southern California District Council of Laborers Supporting Southern California Edison'S License Amendment Request for the Relicensing of San Onofre, Unit 2
NRC-2103-0070, Comment (427) of 100 Individuals Opposing Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2; License Amendment R2013-04-30030 April 2013
Comment (427) of 100 Individuals Opposing Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2; License Amendment Reques
NRC 2013-0070, Comment (425) of K. Sim/P. Reid Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 22013-04-30030 April 2013
Comment (425) of K. Sim/P. Reid Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2
NRC 2013-0070, Comment (395) of D. Moorman/E. Crawford Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 22013-04-30030 April 2013
Comment (395) of D. Moorman/E. Crawford Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2
NRC-2013-0048, Comment (3) of Scott A. Bauer on Behalf of Stars Alliance on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1269; Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Storage Batteries for Nuclear Power Plants2013-03-23023 March 2013
Comment (3) of Scott A. Bauer on Behalf of Stars Alliance on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1269; Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Storage Batteries for Nuclear Power Plants
NRC-2012-0192, Comment (1) of Ray Lutz, on Behalf of Citizens Oversight Projects (Cops), on NRC-2012-0192-0001, Southern California Edison, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 & 3, Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License In2012-09-17017 September 2012
Comment (1) of Ray Lutz, on Behalf of Citizens Oversight Projects (Cops), on NRC-2012-0192-0001, Southern California Edison, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 & 3, Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involvi
NRC-2008-0122, Comment (17) of D. Hooper on Behalf of Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing, on Proposed Emergency Preparedness Rulemaking (NRC-2008-0122; FEMA-2008-0022)2009-10-19019 October 2009
Comment (17) of D. Hooper on Behalf of Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing, on Proposed Emergency Preparedness Rulemaking (NRC-2008-0122; FEMA-2008-0022)
2018-03-20
[Table view] |
Text
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - F--
Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC ..
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M 71--
0.
Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Uc As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:
(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from-its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a
- recognized tsunami, earthquake, and fiestorm zone and is vulnerable to
- climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.
(4) If there were a:radiation. accident there, we,, here in Laguna might escape with our
- lives,. but we would never be able.to come.back to the homes.we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from, San Onofre, and it's imperative that that~happen* as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the :Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base & in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from.SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and. security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods'remain there. .,
Sincerely, Name___ _ __________
Email 0 olci , PdeIc_" . VK ot ,CA- CI-7b 5 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 -
Add= 7.)-*'gJ-*
