Similar Documents at Fermi |
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter type:NRC
MONTHYEARNRC-2022-0063, Comment (3) of Glenda Patzsch-Velasquez on Performance-Based Containment Leak Test Program2022-12-19019 December 2022
Comment (3) of Glenda Patzsch-Velasquez on Performance-Based Containment Leak Test Program
NRC-2014-0109, Comment (49) of Dale W. Zorn on Behalf of State of Michigan on Supporting Application for a 20-Year Extension of the Operating License for Enrico Fermi Unit II2016-01-13013 January 2016
Comment (49) of Dale W. Zorn on Behalf of State of Michigan on Supporting Application for a 20-Year Extension of the Operating License for Enrico Fermi Unit II
NRC-15-0100, Comment (11) of Robert M. Vergiels Supporting Renewing the Operating License for DTE Energy'S Fermi 22016-01-0404 January 2016
Comment (11) of Robert M. Vergiels Supporting Renewing the Operating License for DTE Energy'S Fermi 2
NRC-14-0056, Comment (3) of Zackary W. Rad on Behalf of NEI on Draft Branch Technical Position (BTP) 8-9, Open Phase Conditions in Electric Power System, Docket Id NRC-2014-01312014-07-21021 July 2014
Comment (3) of Zackary W. Rad on Behalf of NEI on Draft Branch Technical Position (BTP) 8-9, Open Phase Conditions in Electric Power System, Docket Id NRC-2014-0131
NRC-2012-0133, Comment (3) of Unknown, Supporting NRC Form 5, Occupational Dose Record for a Monitoring Period2012-07-17017 July 2012
Comment (3) of Unknown, Supporting NRC Form 5, Occupational Dose Record for a Monitoring Period
NRC-10-0066, Comment (8) of Rodney W. Johnson, on Behalf of Detroit Edison, on NRC Draft Regulatory Guide DG-12482010-08-26026 August 2010
Comment (8) of Rodney W. Johnson, on Behalf of Detroit Edison, on NRC Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1248
NRC-09-0058, Comment (4) of Rodney W. Johnson on Behalf of Detroit Edison, Fermi 2, on Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors2009-09-0909 September 2009
Comment (4) of Rodney W. Johnson on Behalf of Detroit Edison, Fermi 2, on Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors
NRC-05-0048, Comment (13) of N. K. Peterson on Behalf of Detroit Edison on Proposed Generic Communication; Grid Reliability and the Impact on Plant Risk and the Operability of Offsite Power2005-06-13013 June 2005
Comment (13) of N. K. Peterson on Behalf of Detroit Edison on Proposed Generic Communication; Grid Reliability and the Impact on Plant Risk and the Operability of Offsite Power
NRC-04-0079, Comment (8) of Norman K. Peterson on NRC Guidance for Operability Determinations2004-10-0101 October 2004
Comment (8) of Norman K. Peterson on NRC Guidance for Operability Determinations
2022-12-19
[Table view] |
Text
77 6"Z4 8s3 Page 1 of 1 A.s of: July 24, 2012
@ eceived: July 17, 2012 tatus: PendingPost PUBLIC SUBMISSION T racking No. 8109ea7f Coomments Due: July 20, 2012 LSubmission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2012-0133 NRC Form 5, "Occupational Dose Record for a Monitoring Period"
_-2 Comment On: NRC-2012-0133-0001 NRC Form 5, Occupational Dose Record for a Monitoring Period Document: NRC-2012-0133-DRAFT-0001 Comment on FR Doc # 2012-14872
- 1 4
--- i
~1 Go Submitter Information General Comment Comment 1: Layout of the proposed draft NRC Form 5 is acceptable.
Comment 2: Cannot modify existing dose tracking system. System is obsolete and not supported.
Estimated cost to purchase replacement dose tracking system is $100,000. Due to replacement cost, will manually track any EDEX and manually update EDEX field on Form 5 when generated.
IT cost to modify layout of Form 5's generated from current dose tracking system to include EDEX field is $4,000.
Comment 3: Multi badging to calculate EDEX is seldom used at Fermi 2. Economic saving will be minimal.
Comment 4: The instructions provided for completing the proposed draft NRC Form 5 are acceptable.
T617 IA4 Z;19V& -60 PJiC :' 01 kW (06L, I) https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectfd=09000064... 07/24/2012
