Text

NPDES Permit Renewal
	ML052580566
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	08/29/2005
From:	Stinson L; Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	NL-05-1512
	Download: ML052580566 (136)
	v • d • e

August 29, 2005 Docket Nos.: 50-348 NL-05-1512 50-364 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant NPDES Permit Renewal Ladies and Gentlemen:

Enclosed in accordance with Section 3.2 ofthe Joseph M. Fancy Nuclear Plant (FNP)

Environmental Protection Plan (Units 1 & 2), Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-2 and NPF-8, is a copy of the package for renewal of the FNP National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number AL00246 19 submitted to the Alabama Department of Environmental Management.

This letter contains no NRC commitments. If you have any questions, please advise.

Sincerely, L. M. Stinson LMS/LPH/sdl

Enclosure:

SNC Letter EV-05-1476, August 24, 2005, RE: NPDES Permit No.

AL0024619 cc: Southern Nuclear Operating Company Mr J. T. Gasser, Executive Vice President Mr. J. R. Johnson, General Manager Plant Farley RTYPE: CFAO4.054; LC# 14325 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Dr. W. D. Travers, Regional Administrator Mr. R. E. Martin, NRR Project Manager Fancy Mr. C. A. Patterson, Senior Resident Inspector Farley

ENCLOSURE NL-05-1512 Joseph M. Fanley Nuclear Plant NPDES Permit Renewal SNC Letter EV-05-1476, August 24, 2005, RE: NPDES Permit No. AL0024619

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

Post Othce Box 1295 Birrningham~A~xamx 3520~1295 Te~2059925000 SOUTHERN~

COMPANY Energy to Serve Your World File E.01.13 August 24, 2005 Log: EV-05-1476 FEDERAL EXPRESS Farlev Nuclear Plant NPDES Permit No. AL0024619 Mr. Onis Trey Glenn, Ill, PE, Director Alabama Department of Environmental Management 1400 Coliseum Boulevard Montgomery, Alabama 36110-2059 Attention: Industrial Section, Water Division

Dear Mr. Glenn:

Enclosed are three (3) copies of the NPDES Permit renewal application package for Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP). The current permit became effective March 1, 2001, and expires on February 28, 2006. The enclosed renewal package contains the completed ADEM Form 187 and EPA Forms 3510-1, 3510-2C, and 3510-2F. Upon request, Southern Nuclear can provide information pertaining to Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act for this facility.

A check in the amount of $9,025.00 is enclosed for payment of the required permit renewal fees per ADEM Administrative Code R.335-1-6. If you have any questions or require additional information regarding the enclosed reapplication package, please contact Greg Elmore at (205) 992-5264.

Sincerely, J. M. Godfréy, Manager Environmental Affairs JMG/GDE:ahl Enclosure cc: Sandra Lee (wi Enclosure)

Mr. Onis Trey Glenn, Ill, PE Alabama Department of Environmental Management EV 1476 Page 2 bcc: w/o

Enclosure:

L. M. Stinson W. F. Kitchens J. R. Johnson M. J. Ajluni R. A. Livingston W. A. Sim WI

Enclosure:

M. K. Darby FNP Document Control (R-Type GOl .029)

SNC Document Management Farley

SOUTHERN Southern Nuclear Operating company AmSouth Bank of Walker county 61-373 corporate Office Jasper, Alabama 35502 622 COMPANY Post Office Box 1295 Energy to Serve Your World Birmingham, Alabama 35201-1295 check Date: 8/16/2005 check Number: 131509 Pay Nine Thousand Twenty-Five and 00/100 Dollars $ 9025.00 To Alabama Department of Environmental Management The P. 0. Box 301463 Order A*tn: Permits and Services Divisions Of Montgomery, AL 36130-1463 lJi~JJL4yi%~t4~f11 A,thon,od S,~n~tu,e

~~I1 ~

II ~ 3 ~ 5O~ll :o~220 ~ ~ ~: ~oo ~ ~311 SOUTHERN Southern Nuclear corporate Office Operating company Vendor: Alabama Department of Environmental Management COMPANY Post Office Box 1295 check Date: 08/16/2005 check Number: 131509 Energy to Serve Your World Birmingham, Alabama 35201-1295 Bank Number: 61-373/622 check Amount: 9,025.00 Invoice Date Invoice Number Invoice Amount 2~ReferenceNumber Description 08/11/2005 0508111437 9,02500 C050816003 NPDES Permit Renewal Fees Total 9,025.00 _________________ Greg Elmore, Ext. 5264 -- PLEASE DO NOT MAIL

Application for Permit Renewal NPDES Permit No. AL0024619 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operatino Company Aucust 2005 SOUThERNL~

ADEM Form 187 NPDES Permit Application Supplementary Information Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company Aucust 2005

NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)

PERMIT APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER DIVISION INDUSTRIAL SECTION POST OFFICE BOX 301463 MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36 130-1463 INSTRUCTIONS: APPLICATIONS SHOULD BE TYPED OR PRINTED IN INK AND SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT IN DUPLICATE. PLEASE CONTINUE ON AN ATTACHED SHEET OF PAPER IF INSUFFICIENT SPACE IS AVAILABLE TO ADDRESS ANY ITEM BELOW. PLEASE MARK N/A IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX WHEN AN ITEM IS NON-APPLICABLE TO THE APPLICANT.

PURPOSE OF THIS APPLICATION INITIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR NEW FACILITY INITIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR EXISTING FACILITY MODIFICATION OF EXISTING PERMIT ~ REISSUANCE OF EXISTING PERMIT REVOCATION & REISSUANCE OF EXISTING PERMIT

1. Facility Name: Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant

a. Operator Name: Southern Nuclear Operating Cor~ipany

b. Is the operator identified in l.a., the owner of the thcility? Yes ______ No X If no, provide the name and address of the operator and submit information indicating the operators scope of responsibility for the facility.

See Attachment 1.

2. NPDES Permit Number AL 0024619

3. SID Permit Number (if applicable): lU - - N/A

4. NPDES General Permit Number (if applicable) ALG N/A

5. Facility Location: (Attach a map with location marked; street, route no. or other specific identifier)

Street: 7388 North State Highway 95 City: Columbia County: Houston State: Alabama Zip: 36319

6. Facility Mailing Address (Street or Post Office Box): P. 0. Box 1295 City: Birmingham County: Jefferson State: Alabama Zip: 35201

7. Responsible Official (as described on page 11 of this application):

Name and

Title:

L. M. Stinson, Vice President Farley Project Address: P.O. Box 1295 City: Birmingham State: Alabama Zip: 35201-1295 Phone Number: (205) 992-5000 ADEM Form 187 8/04m1 Page 1 of 14

8. Designated Facility

Contact:

Name and

Title:

Gregory D. Elmore, Senior Engineer Phone Number: (205) 992-5264

9. Type of Business Entity:

j~..Corporation General Partnership Limited Partnership Sole Proprietorship Other (Please Specify)

10. Complete this section if the Applicants business entity is a Corporation a) Location of Incorporation:

Address: 1209 Orange Street City: Wilmington State: Delaware Zip: 19801 b) Parent Corporation of Applicant:

Name: Southern Comoanv Address: 270 Peachtree Street City: Atlanta State: Georgia Zip: 30303 C) Subsidiary Corporation(s) of Applicant:

Name: N/A Art 1r~cs~

City: State:_____________________________ Zip:

d) Corporate Officers:

Name: James Barnie Beaslev. President & CEO P~°~~ P.O. Box 1295 City: Birmingham State: Alabama Zip: 35201-1295 Name: Bentina Chisolm Terry, VP External Affairs, General Counsel, & Corporate Secretary Address: P.O. Box 1295 City: Birmingham State: Alabama Zip: 35201-1295 ADEM Form 187 8/04 Page2of~l4

e) Agent designated by the corporation for purposes of service:

Name: Bentina Chisolm Terry, VP External Affairs, General Counsel, & Corporate Secretary Address: PC) Rn~1795 City: Birminoham State:___________________________

Alabama Zip: 35201-1295

11. Please complete this section if the Applicants business entity is a Partnership a) General Partners:

Name: N/A Address:

City: State: Zip:

Name:

Address:

City: Stat~: Zip:

12. Please complete this section if the Applicants business entity is a Proprietorship a) Proprietor:

Name: N/A Address: ______

City: State: Zip:

13. Permit numbers for Applicants previously issued NPDES Permits and identification of any other State Environmental Permits presently held by the Applicant or its parent corporation or subsidiary corporations within the State:

Permit Name Permit Number Held by See Attachment 2.

ADEM Form 187 8/04 Page 3 of 14

14. Identify all Administrative Complaints, Notices of Violation, Directives, or Administrative Orders, or Litigation concerning water pollution, if any, against the Applicant, its parent corporation or subsidiary corporations within the State within the past five years (attach additional sheets if necessary):

Facility Name Permit Number Type of Action Date of Action None ________________

SECTION B BUSINESS ACTIVITY

1. If your facility conducts or will be conducting any of the processes listed below (regardless of whether they generate wastewater, waste sludge, or hazardous wastes), place a check beside the category of business activity (check all that apply):

Industrial Categories Aluminum Forming [ } Metal Molding and Casting I Asbestos Manufacturing I I Metal Products I Battery Manufacturing [ Nonferrous Metals Forming I I Can Making [ ] Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing I Canned and Preserved Fruit and Vegetables [ ] Oil and Gas Extraction I Canned and Preserved Seafood [ I Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Cement Manufacturing [ } Paint and Ink Formulating Centralized Waste Treatment [ ] Paving and Roofing Manufacturing Carbon Black [ I Pesticides Manufacturing Coal Mining [ ] Petroleum Refining Coil Coating [ ] Phosphate Manufacturing Copper Forming [ Photographic Electric and Electronic Components Manufacturing [ ] Pharmaceutical Electroplating [ ] Plastic & Synthetic Matls Explosives Manufacturing [ ] Plastics Processing Manufacturing Feedlots [ Porcelain Enamel Ferroalloy Manufacturing [ ] Pulp, Paper, and Fiberboard Manufacturing Fertilizer Manufacturing [ ] Rubber Foundries (Metal Molding and Casting) [ } Soap and Detergent Manufacturing Glass Manufacturing [X } Steam and Electric Grain Mills [ I Sugar Processing Gum and Wood Chemicals Manufacturing [ ] Textile Mills Inorganic Chemicals [ ] Timber Products Iron and Steel [ ] Transportation Equipment Cleaning Leather Tanning and Finishing [ ] Waste Combustion Metal Finishing [ } Other (specify)________________

I Meat Products A facility with processes inclusive in these business areas may be covered by Environmental Protection (EPA) categorical standards. These facilities are termed categorical users.

ADEM Form 1 87 8/04 Page 4 of 14

2. Give a brief description of all operations at this facility including primary products or services (attach additional sheets if necessary): I This is a two unit steam electric generating facility with a combined rating of 1 ,776 megawatts.

3. Production: (projected for new facilities)

Last 12 Months Highest F~roductionYear of Last 5 Years Average Production of Last 5 Years Product(s) Manufactured (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day)

Brand name Highest Month MOnthly Avg. Production 5 Year Avg. Production SECTION C - WASTEWATER DISCHARGE INFORMATION Facilities that checked activities in question 1 of Section B are considered Categorical Industrial Users and should skip to question 2 of this section.

1. For Non-Categorical Users Only: List highest monthly flow in the past 12 months, highest flow year of last 5 years, and average flow for the past 5 years, and the type of discharge for each plant process. Include the reference number from the process flow schematic (reference Figure 1) that corresponds to each process.

[New facilities should provide estimates for each discharge.]

ADEM Form 187 8/04 Page 5 of 14

Last 12 Months Highest Flow Year of Last 5 Years Average Flow of Last 5 Years Discharge Type (gals/day) (gals/day) (gals/day) (batch, cont.,

Process Description Highest Month Avg. Flow Monthly Avg. Flow 5 Year Avg. Flow none)

N/AZ If batch discharge ocurs or will occur, indicate: [New facilities may estimate.]

a. Number of batch discharges: N/A per day

b. Average discharge per batch: (GPD)

c. Time of batch discharges ____________________ at __________________________

(days of week) (hours of day)

d. Flow rate: ___________________________ gallons/minute

e. Percent of total discharge Answer questions 2, 3, and 4 only if you are subject to Categorical Standards.

2. For Categorical Users: Provide the wastewater discharge flows or production (whichever is applicable by the effluent guidelines) for each of your processes or proposed processes. Include the reference number from the process flow schematic (reference Figure 1) that corresponds to each process. [New facilities should provide estimates for each discharge.I Type of Discharge Flow Regulated Process Applicable Category Applicable Subpart (batch, continuous, none)

See Attachment 3 _________________ _________________ ___________________

Categorical Process Categorical Production or Flow Last 12 Months Highest Year of Last 5 Years Average of Last 5 Years (e.g., MGD or lbs/day) Highest Month Monthly Average 5 Year Average ADEM Form 187 8/04 Page 6 of 14

Last 12 Months Highest Flow Year of Last 5 Years Average Flow of Last 5 Years Discharge Type Unregulated gals/day gals/day gals/day (batch, cont.,

Process Description Highest Month Avg. Flow Monthly Avg. Flow 5 Year Avg. Flow none)

Non-Process Discharges Last 12 Months Highest Flow Year of Last 5 Years Average Flow of Last 5 Years Discharge Type (e.g. non-contact gals/day gals/day gals/day (batch, cont.,

cooling water) Highest Month Avg. Flow Monthly Avg. Flow , 5 Year Avg. Flow none)

If batch discharge occurs or will occur, indicate: [New facilities may estimate.I

a. Number of batch discharges: per day

b. Average discharge per batch: (GPD)

c. Time of batch discharges _____________________at __________________________

(days of week) (hours of day)

d. Flow rate:____________________________ gallons/minute

e. Percent of total discharge

3. Do you have, or plan to have, automatic sampling equipment or continuous wastewater flow metering equipment at this facility?

Current: Flow Metering Yes X No N/A Sampling Equipment Yes No X N/A Planned: Flow Metering Yes No X N/A Sampling Equipment Yes No X N/A If so, please indicate the present or future location of this equipment on the sewer schematic and describe the equipment below:

N/A

4. Are any process changes or expansions planned during the next three years that could alter wastewater volumes or characteristics? Yes ________________ No X (If no, skip Question 5)

Briefly describe these changes and their effects on the wastewater volume and characteristics: (Attach additional sheets if needed.)

N/A ADEM Form 187 8/04 Page 7 of 14

5. List the trade name and chemical composition of all biocides and corrosion inhibitors used:

Trade Name Chemical Composition See Attachment 4 ________________________

For each biocide and/or corrosion inhibitor used, please include the following information:

(1) 96-hour median tolerance limit data for organisms representative of the biota of the waterway into which the discharge will ultimately reach, (2) quantities to be used, (3) frequencies of use, (4) proposed discharge concentrations, and (5) EPA registration number, if applicable SECTION 0- WATER SUPPLY Water Sources (check as many as are applicable):

[X I Private Well [X I Surface Water I Municipal Water Utility (Specify City): [ I Other (Specify):

IF MORE THANONE WELL OR SURFACE INTAKE, PROVIDEDATA FOR EACHON AN ATTACHMENT SEE ATTACHMENT 5 FOR WELL INFORMATION City:__0 *MGD Well: *MGD Well Depth: Ft. Latitude: _____________ Longitude:

Surface Intake: 93.9 *MGD Intake Elevation: 64~ Ft. Latitude: 31° 13 01 Longitude: 850 05 5.8 Name of Surface Water Source: Chattahoochee River

MGD = Million Gallons Per Day SECTION E - WASTE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL INFORMATION Provide a description of the location of all sites involved in the storage of solids or liquids that could be accidentally discharged to a water of the state, either directly or indirectly via such avenues as storm water drainage, municipal wastewater systems, etc., that are located at the facility for which the NPDES application is being made. Where possible the location should be noted on a map and included with this application:

Description of Waste Description of Storage Location See Attachment 6.

Provide a description of the location of the ultimate disposal sites of solid or liquid waste by-products (such as sludges) from any wastewater treatment system located at the facility.

ADEM Form 187 8/04 Page8ofl4

Description of Waste Quantity Disposal Method*

(lbs/day)

See Attachment 6.

Indicate which wastes identified above are disposed of at an off-site treatment facility and which are disposed of on-site. If any wastes are sent to an off-site centralized waste treatment facility, identify the waste and the facility.

SECTION F COASTAL ZONE INFORMATION Is the discharge(s) located within 10-foot elevation of Mobile or Baldwin County?

Yes [ ] No [ X I If yes, then complete items A through M below:.

YES NO A. Does the project require new construction?

B. Will the project be a source of new air emissions?

C. Does the project involve dredging and/or filling?

Has the Corps of Engineers (COE) permit been received?

Corps Project Number ______________________________

D. Does the project involve wetlands and/or submersed grassbeds?

E. Are oyster reefs located near the project site?

(Include a map showing project and discharge location with respect to oyster reefs)

E. Does the project involve the siting, construction and operation of an energy facility as defined in ADEM Admin. Code R. 335-8-1-.02(bb)?

G. Does the project involve shoreline erosion mitigation? *

H. Does the project involve construction on beaches and dunes?

I. Will the project interfere with public access to coastal waters?

J. Does the project lie within the 100-year floodplain?

K. Does the project involve the registration, sale, use, or application of pesticides?

L. Does the project propose to construct a new well or alter an existing well to pump more than 50 GPD?

M. Has the applicable permit been obtained?

SECTION G - ANTI-DEGRADATION EVALUATION In accordance with 40 CFR 131.12 and the Alabama Department of Environmental Management Administrative Code, Section 335-6-10-04 for antidegradation, the following information must be provided, if applicable. It is the ADEM Form 187 8/04 Page 9 of 14

applicants responsibility to demonstrate the social and economic importance of the proposed activity. If further information is required to make this demonstration, attach additional sheets to the application.

1. Is this a new or increased discharge that began after April 3, 1991? Yes [ I No [ X ].

If yes, complete question 2 below. If no, do not complete this section.

2. Has an Anti-Degradation Analysis been previously conducted and submitted to the Department for the new or increased discharge referenced in question 1? Yes [ I No [ 1. N/A If no, complete questions A through F below and ADEM forms 311 and 313 (attached). Form 313 must be provided for each alternative considered technically viable. If yes, do not complete this section.

Information required for new or increased discharges to high quality waters:

A. What environmental or public health problem will the discharger be correcting?

B. How much will the discharger be increasing employment (at its existing facility or as the result of locating a new facility)?

C. How much reduction in employment will the discharger be avoiding?

D. How much additional state or local taxes will the discharger be paying?

E. What public service to the community will the discharger be providing?

F. What economic or social benefit will the discharger be providing to the community?

SECTION H EPA Application Forms All Applicants must submit EPA permit application forms. More than one application form may be required from a facility depending on the number and types of discharges or outfalls found there. The EPA application forms are found on the Departments website at http://www.adem.state.al.us/. The EPA application forms must be submitted in duplicate as follows:

1. All applicants must submit Form 1.

2. Applicants for existing industrial facilities (including manufacturing facilities, commercial facilities, mining activities, and silvicultural activities) that discharge process wastewater must submit Form 2C.

3. Applicants for new industrial facilities that propose to discharge process wastewater must submit Form 2D.

4. Applicants for new and existing industrial facilities that discharge only non-process wastewater (i.e., non-contact cooling water and/or sanitary wastewater) must submit Form 2E.

5. Applicants for new and existing facilities whose discharge is composed entirely of storm water associated with industrial activity must submit Form 2F, unless exempted by § 122.26(c)(1)(ii). If the discharge is composed of storm water and non-storm water, the applicant must also submit, Forms 2C, 2D, and/or 2E, as appropriate (in addition to Form 2F),

SECTION I ENGINEERING REPORT/BMP PLAN REQUIREMENTS See ADEM 335-6-6-08(i) & (j)

ADEM Form 187 8/04 Page 10 of 14

SECTION J APPLICATION CERTIFICATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM MUST BE CERTIFIED BYA RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL AS DEFINED IN ADEM ADMINISTRATIVE RULE 335-6-6-.09 SIGNATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMIT APPLICATIONS (SEE BELOW).

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION OR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY GATHER AND EVALUATE THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED. BASED ON MY INQUIRY OF THE PERSON OR PERSONS WHO MANAGE THE SYSTEM, OR THOSE PERSONS DIRECTLY RESONSIBLE FOR GATHERING THE INFORMATION, THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, TRUE, ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE.I AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR SUBMITTING FALSE INFORMATION INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING VIOLATIONS.

I FURTHER CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT ALL ANALYSES REPORTED AS LESS THAN DETECTABLE IN THIS APPLICATION OR ATTACHMENTS THERETO WERE PERFORMED USING THE EPA APPROVED TEST METHOD HAVING THE LOWEST DETECTION LIMIT FOR THE SUBSTANCE TESTED.

SIGNATURE OF ~ DATE ~ / /

RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Z-, 7~ I,~~t-i~---- SIGNED: ~ / ~ //

-.~ ~

(TYPE OR PRINT)

NAME OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: L. M. Stinson OFFICIAL TITLE OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Vice President, Farley Project MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1295, Birmingham, AL 35201-1295 AREA CODE & PHONE NUMBER: (205) 992-5000 SIGNATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMIT APPLICATIONS Responsible official is defined as follows:

1. In the case of a corporation, by a principal officer of at least the level of vice president; or a manager assigned or delegated in accordance with corporate procedures, with such delegation submitted in writing if required by the Department, who is responsible for manufacturing, production, or operating facilities and is authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation of the regulated facility;

2. In the case of a partnership, by a general partner;

3. In the case of a sole proprietorship, by the proprietor; or

4. In the case of a municipal, state, federal, or other public facility, by either a principal executive officer, or ranking elected official.

ADEM Form 187 8/04 Page 11 of 14

Alternatives Analysis Applicant/Project. N/A All new or expanded discharges (except discharges eligible for coverage under general permits) covered by the NPDES permitting program are subject to the provisions of the antidegradation policy. Applicants for such discharges to Tier 2 waters are required to demonstrate . . that the proposed discharge is necessary for important economic or social development. As a part of this demonstration, the applicant must complete an evaluation of the discharge alternatives listed below, to include calculation of total annualized project costs for each technically feasible alternative (using ADEM Form 312 for public-sector projects and ADEM Form 313 for private-sector projects). Alternatives with total annualized project costs that are less than 110% of the total annualized project costs for the Tier 2 discharge proposal are considered viable alternatives.

Alternative Viable Non-Viable Comment

~

~reati~ent/DischaretoPOTW 3 Relocation of Discharge 4 Reuse/Recycle 5 Process/Treatment Alternatives I -_

6 On-site/Sub-surface Disposal (other project-spec (tic alternatives considered by the at,vlicant; attach additional sheets if necessary) 7 8

9 Pursuam to ADE,lL4clmiuistrative Code Signature:

Rule 335-6-3-.04, I certify on behalfofthe (Professional Engineei) applicant that I have completed an evaluation of the discharge alternatives identified above, Date:

and reached the conc/zisions indicated.

(Supporting documentation to be attached, referenced, or otherwise handled as appropriate.)

ADEM Form 311 8/02 Page 13 of 14

Calculation of Total Annualized Project Costs for Private-Sector Projects Capital Costs to be Financed (Supplied by applicant) $ N/A (1)

Interest rate for Financing (Expressed as a decimal) (i)

Time Period of Financing (Assume 10 years*) 10 years (n)

Annualization Factor = i + i (2)

(l+i)tO 1 -

Annualized Capital Cost [Calculate: (1) x (2)] S (3)

Annual Cost of Operation and Maintenance (including but not limited to monitoring, inspection, permitting fees, waste disposal charges, repair, administration and replacement) S (4)

Total Annual Cost ofPollution Control Project [(3) + (4)] IS (5J While actual payback schedules may differ across projects and companies, assume equal annual payments over a 10-year period for consistency in comparing projects.

For recurring costs that occur less frequently than once a year, pro rate the cost over the relevant number of years (e.g., for pumps replaced once every three years, include one-third of the cost in each year).

ADEM Form 313 8/02 Page 14 of 14

FIGURE 1 BLUE RIVER MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY 90,000 GPD GPO 30,000 GPD RAW MATERIALS ATMOSPHERE TO PRODUCT 5,000 GPO 4,000 GPO I OUTFALL 002 4,50~000GPO STORM WATER 70,000 GPO + STORM WATER OUTFALL 001 MAX: 20,000 GPO SCHEMATIC OF WATER FLOW BROWN MILLS INC CITY, COUNTY, STATE

Attachment I to ADEM Form 187 Owner and Operator Information Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operatinc Company Aucust 200~

Owner and Operator Information Farley Nuclear Plant The operator of Farley Nuclear Plant is Southern Nuclear Operating Company. Alabama Power Company is the owner of this facility. Southern Nuclear Operating Company is responsible for the safe and reliable operation of six (6) nuclear units, including Farley Nuclear Plant, and is the licensed operator under U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations.

Operator Address:

Southern Nuclear Operating Company P.O. Box 1295 Birmingham, AL 35201-1295 Owner Address:

Alabama Power Company 600 North 1 th Street 8

Birmingham, AL 35291 ADEM Form 1 87 Attachment 1 Owner & Operator Information Page 1 of I

Attachment 2 to ADEM Form 187 Previously Issued State Environmental Permits Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company ..,.~-

August 2005

Previously Issued NPDES Permits and Other State Environmental Permits Farley Nuclear Plant Permit Name Permit Number Held By NPDES Permit AL0024619 Southern Nuclear Operating Co Water Supply Permit 96-5 83 Southern Nuclear Operating Co Solid Waste Disposal Facility Permit 35-05 Southern Nuclear Operating Co Certificate of Use 0063.2 Southern Nuclear Operating Co (Issued by Office of Water Resources)

NPDES Construction Stormwater Registration ALRI6O 146 Southern Nuclear Operating Co (ADEM Code Ch. 33 5-6-12)

NPDES Construction Storrnwater Registration ALRI 63388 Southern Nuclear Operating Co (ADEM Code Ch. 335-6-12) ~

ADEM Form I 87 Attachment 2 Permits List Page 1 of 1

Attachment 3 to ADEM Form 187 Categorical Process Information Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company Aucust 2005

Categorical Standards Information Farley Nuclear Plant Regulated Process Applicable Category Applicable Su~p~ Type of Discharge Flow Once-Through Cooling 40 LFR 423 423.l3(h)I1 I Continuous 423. 13(b 1(2)

Metal Cleaning 40 CFR 423 423.12(b)(5) Continuous Low Volume Wastes 40 CFR 423 4J~~b)~_ Continuous & Intermittent Cooling Tower 40 CFR 423 423.l3(d)(I) Continuous Blowdown 423.l3(d)(2)

Categorical Last 12 Months Last 12 Months Max Year in Last 5 Years Five Year Process Monthly Average Highest Month Flow Monthly Aserage Ave~ge DSN0O1 80.~73MUD 88.60 MUD 80.76 MUD 79.26 MGD DSNOO5 5.280 MGD 6.943 MGD 5.68% MUD 4.478 MGD DSNOO6 0 MGD 0 MGD 0.548 MUD 0.126 MGD DSNOO7 4.867 MUD 6.044 MGD 5.253 MUD 4.286 MUD DSNOO8 0 MGD 0 MGD 0.016 MGD 0.005 MGD DSNO12 0 MGD 0 MGD 0 MUD 0 MGD DSNOI3 0 MUD OMUD - 0 MGD 0 MGD DSNOI4 0.3 17 MUD 0.391 MGO 0.339 MGD 0.305 MUD DSNO15 0.045 MGD 0.077 MGD 0.153 MUD 0.102 MGD DSNO16 0.038 MGD 0.078 MGD 0.062 MUD 0.048 MGD DSNOI7 0.013 MUD 0.131 MGD 0.024 MUD 0.021 MGD DSNOI8 0.023 MUD 0.138 MGD 0.025 MGD 0.023 MGD D5N022 0.014 MUD 0.047 MGD 0.030 MUD 0.016 MGD D5N023 0.026 MGD 0.130 MGD, 0.040 MUD I 0.028 MGD Non- Last 12 Months Last 12 Months Max Year in Last 5 Categorical Monthly Average Highest Month Flow Monthly Average Process DSNOO9 0.OISMGD ftO43MUl) 0.OI4MGD Batch Release Information Outfalls DSNOI9 and DSNO2O are batch release operations. These outfalls are liquid radwaste discharges from each unit, and are released in accordance with U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations and requirements. There is not a specified frequency for these discharges; the frequency and volume of water processed by the liquid radwaste system is highly dependent on activities that occur within the facility. For example, the volume of water processed is typically higher during unit refueling outages which occur on 18-month cycles. Each unit has two 5,000 gallon Waste Monitor Tanks (WMT) from which liquid radwaste discharges occur. The design flow of each WMT discharge pump is 35 gpm.

-. ADEM Form 187 Attachment 3 Categorical Standards Information Page 1 of 1

Attachment 4 to ADEM Form 187 Biocides and Corrosion Inhibitors Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operatine Company August 2005 -

Biocides and Corrosion Inhibitors Farley Nuclear Plant A Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) is available for each of the products listed, and can be provided upon request.

Commodity Sodium ilvoochlorite (Bleachl Trade Name N/A (Provided by GE Water Technologies)

Composition Sodium Hypochlorite, Sodium Chloride, Sodium Hydroxide Aquatic Toxicology Rainbow Trout 96-hr Static Acute Bioassy LC5O = 1.9 mg/L No Effect Level = 1.38 mg/L Daphnia Magna 48-hr Static Acute Bioassay LC5O = 1.6 mg/L No_Effect_Level_=_0.51_mg/L Quantities Bulk Frequencies of Use Daily Discharge Concentrations In accordance with NPDES permit limitations EPA Registration Number ---

Potassium Chromate Trade Name N/A (Provided by Fisher Scientific)

Composition Chromic Acid Dipotassium Salt Aquatic Toxicology Daphnia Magna LC5O = 15.3 pglL as chromium Quantities Commercially avail4de packages Frequencies ofUse As needed I Discharge Concentrations Not subject to discharge (utilized in closed system).

EPA Registration Number ---

Potassium Dichromate Trade Name N/A (Provided by Fisher Scientific)

~p~p~sitiop~ Chromic Acid, Dipotassiurn Salt Aquatic Toxicology Fathead Minnow LC5O = 17,300 ~sg/Las chromium

~sg/Las chromium Quantities ~pe~cialla~ailable packages Frequencies of Use As needed Discharge Concentrations Not subject to discharge (utilized in closed system).

EPA Registration Number ---

ADEM Form 187 Attachment 4 Biocides and Corrosion Inhibitors Page 1 of 3

Drewgard 4109 Corrosion Inhibitor Trade Name Drewgard 4109 Corrosion Inhibitor Composition Sodium Metaborate Tetrahydrate, Sodium Nitrate, Sodium Tetraborate Decahydrate, Sodium Nitrite, Sodium Metasilicate Anhydrous, Acrylic Polymer Aquatic Toxicology No ecological data provided on Material Safety Data Sheet Quantities Commercially available packages Frequencies ofUse As needed Discharge Concentrations Not subject to discharge (utilized in closed system).

EPA Registration Number ---

Biosperse 254 Microbiocide______________________________________________________________________

Trade Name Biosperse 254 Microbiocide Composition Ulutaraldehyde, Methanol Aquatic Toxicology Seven Day Ceriodaphnia dubia static renewal conditions:

7DayLC5O=2.6mg/L NOEC = 1.56 mg/L LOEC = 3.13 mg/L 1C50_=_2.2_mg/L Quantities Commercially available packages Frequencies of Use As needed Discharge Concentrations Not subject to discharge (utilized in closed system).

EPA Registration Number ---

11-166 WPD TradeName ll-I66WPD Composition Sodium Tolyltriazole Aquatic Toxicology No ecological data provided on Material Safety Data Sheet Quantities Commercially available packages Frequencies of Use As needed Discharge Concentrations Not subject to discharge (utilized in closed system).

EPA Registration Number ---

ADEM Form 1 87 Attachment 4 Biocides and Corrosion Inhibitors Page 2 of 3

Spectrus CT1300 Trade Name Spectrus CTI 300 Composition Alkyl DimethylBenzyl Ammonium Chloride, Ethyl Alcohol Aquatic Toxicology Channel Catfish 96-hr Acute Toxicity:

LC5O = 0.86 mg/L No Effect Level = 0.54 mg/L Fathead Minnow 96-hr Flow-Thru Bioassay:

LC5O = 0.72 rng/L No_Effect_Level_=_0.41_mg/L Quantities One 1,000-gallon tank per unit Frequencies of Use As needed for algae control in the cooling towers, added when cooling tower blowdown is closed and allowed to naturally decay for at least 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months prior to opening blowdown.

Discharge Concentrations Normally product is decayed prior to opening cooling towerblowdown; concentrations at the Main Combined Facility Discharge are not expected to exceed the LC5O values provided above.

EPA Registration Number ---

ADEM Form 187 Attachment 4 Biocides and Corrosion Inhibitors Page 3 of 3

Attachment 5 to ADEM Form 187 Water Supply Sources Wells Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005

Water Supply Sources Wells Farley Nuclear Plant Well Capacity (MGD) DepthJjI~ Latitude Longitude Production Well #1 Out of Service --- -..

Production Well #2 0.720 775 31° 13 02 N 85° 06 49 W Production Well #3 0.180 392 31° 13 01 N 85° 06 50 W Construction Well #1 0.216 244 31° 13 34N 85° 07 02W Construction Well #2 0.216 325 310 13 35 N 85° 06 51 W

~ ~

Water Supply Well 0.036 240 31° 12 45N 85° 06 39W Plant Entrance Well 0.022 31° 13 09N 85° 07 22W Daniel Well #3 Abandoned ---

Daniel Well #4 Abandoned --- ---

ADEM Form 187 Attachment 5 Water Supply Sources Page 1 of I

Attachment 6 to ADEM Form 187 Waste Storage and Disposal Information Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company Aucust 2005

Materials Management Practices Farley Nuclear Plant There have been no significant quantities ofhazardous materials or wastes at FNP over the past three (3) years which have been treated, stored, or disposed in a manner which would result in exposure to stormwater and / or contamination of stormwater runoff. The following FNP procedures address management of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes and provide guidance relative to prevention of contamination resulting from contact with stormwater.

FNP-0-AP-60 Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan, Hazardous Waste Contingency Plan FNP-0-CCP-900 Hazardous Waste Holding Area Requirements FNP-0-CCP-901 Shipping ofHazardous Wastes FNP-0-CCP-904 Receipt and Identification of Industrial Wastes FNP-0-CCP-905 Chemistry Support to FNP-0-SHP-26 FNP-0-SHP-26 Chemical Product Control and Hazard Communication Program FNP-0-SHP-30 Waste Disposal FNP-0-ENV-25 Operation of the Farley Nuclear Plant Landfill FNP-0-TCP-23 Hazardous Waste Train~ngPlan In addition to the above procedures, proactive materials management practices are employed to minimize contact of hazardous materials with stormwater including indoor storage, structural control measures, secondary containment for tanks and container storage, and materials management training. A formal Hazard Communication Program (FNP-0-SHP-26) has also been implemented.

A Hazardous Waste Holding Area is located at the sewage treatment plant, and a Mixed Waste Holding Area is located inside the Auxiliary Building. Hazardous Waste Satellite Accumulation Areas have been established at the Secondary Chemistry Laboratory, the Water Treatment Plant, the Spent Battery Storage Building, the Paint Shop, and the Security Firing Range. The largest storage container at these locations is a 55-gallon drum. Additionally, an on-site Hazardous Waste Storage Area has been designated to be used in the event that the facility were to become a Large Quantity Generator.

Universal Waste collection areas have been established at the warehouse and at the Turbine Building Bay.

Sludge from the sewage treatment plant is removed by Tn-Counties Sewer Services, and the ultimate disposal site is the Omussee Creek Treatment Plant, operated by the City of Dothan.

ADEM Form 1 87 Attachment 6 Materials Management Practices Page 1 of I

U.S. EPA Form 351 0-1 General Information Consolidated Permits Program Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005

Please print or type in the unshaded areas only fill-in areas ares aced fore/ito t e. ic. 12 characters/inch For Approved. 0MB No. 2040-0086. Approval expires 5-31-92 FORM U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY I. EPA ID. NUMBER

_ GENERAL INFORMATION s T/A C I Consolidated Permits Program

. F AL0024619 GENERAL Read the General Instructions before startin 1 2 13 14 15 LABEL ITEMS GEN ONS If a pre provided, I. EPAI.D. NUMBER affix itin ewthe informatio of it is incorre nter the III CAfII ITV PJAPJIE correct fill-in area I below. *nted data is

__________________________ absent a f the label V. FACILITY PLEASE PLACE LABEL IN THIS SPACE ~papear~ts that should R~AII MG I i~r in areae is complete

,vip~ii_uri i_i i and corr lete Items Ill, V, must be comple ete all items VI. FACILITY if no Ia Refer to the instructio descriptions LOCATION and fort under which this data II. POLLUTANT CHARACTERISTICS INSTRUCTIONS: Complete A through J to determine whether you need to submit any permit application forms to the yes to any questions, you must submit this form and the supplemental from listed in the parenthesis following the question. Mark third column if the supplemental form is attached If you answer no to each question, you need not submit any of these forms. You activity is excluded from rmit re uirements see Section C of the instructions. See also Section 0 of the instructions for defin s.

SPECIFIC QUESTIONS MARK X SPECIFIC QUESTIONS ARK X~

________ ATtACHED ATtAcHED A Is this facility a publicly owned treatment works B. Does or will this facility feither e which results in a discharge to waters of the ~ jj~ proposed) include a concentrated an U.S.? (FORM 2A) feeding operation or aquatic

__________________ production facility which results in a

~ii~ 17 18 to waters ofthe U.S.? (FORM 2B) 9 20 21 G ((iii fac/ity which currently results in 171 . Is this proposal facility (other than discharges to waters of the U.S. other than those described in A or B above? (FORM 2C) 22 23

~

24 in A or B above) which will result in a to waters of the U.S.? FORM 20 25 26 27 E. Does or will this facility treat, store, or dispose of F. Do you or will you inject at this faci hazardous wastes? (FORM 3) LI ~ LI i municipal effluent below the lowermost containing, within one quarter mile of the well bore underground sources of drinking water? _____________________

~ - -~ 28 29 30 I (FORM 4) 31 32 33 i ~ bF~~~r~ti iTiiiject at this facility any H. Do you or will you inject at this facility flul for produced water other fluids which are brought to special processes such as mining of sulfer by the the surface in connection with conventional oil or natural gas production, inlect fiulds used for n E Frasch process solution mining of minerals, in situ combustion of fossil fuel, or recovery of enhanced recovery of oil or natural gas or inlect geothermal energy? IFORM 4) fluids for storage of liquid hydrocarbons? ___________

(FORMQ,_ -~ .- 34 35 39 _______________

I Is this facility a proposed stationary source J. Is this facility a proposed stationary source which is one of the 28 industrial categories listed ~ which is NOT one of the 28 industrial categories in the instructions and which will poterniaily emit l~J listed in the instructions and which will potentially 100 tons per year of any air pollutant regulated emit 250 tons per year of any air pollutant under the Clean Air Act and may affect or be __ . regulated under the Clean Air Act and may affect _________

located in an attainment area? FORM 5 40 41 42 or be located in an attainment are? ORM 5 43 44 45 III. NAME OF FACILITY SKIP FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT If, 19-29 30 69 IV. FACILITY CONTACT

___________ A NAME & TITLE last first. & title B. PHONE area code & no.

EL MORE, GREGORY, SENIOR ENGINEER 20548 49 5264~~

V. FACILITY MAILING ADDRESS A STREET OR P.O. BOX

~---jP. 0. B0X1295 1* 19 43 B. CITY OR TOWN C. STATE 0. ZIP CODE~j BIRMINGHAM AL 35201 16 4C I I 41 42 47 51 VI. FACILITY LOCATION A. STREET ROUTE NO. OR OTHER SPECIFIC IDENTIFIER

-j--~7388 NORTHSTATE HIGHWAY 95 is ha -..---- 45

__________ B COUNTY NAME _______

HOUSTON 7

-______ C CITY OR TOWN ____ DSTATELE.ZJPCQP~iF. COUNTY COD~

COLUMBIA AL I 36319 I N/A

- ~ 41 11 4i ii ~t2~4 LL EP4 FORM 3510-1 (8-90) CONTINUED ON RE\ ERSE

map must

~s,each of its ide all springs, Generation of electricity through the use of nuclear fuel.

I certify under penalty of law that / have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this application and all attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those persons immediately responsible for obtaining the information contained in the application, I believe that the information is true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submittinQ false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment.

A. NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE (typo or print) B. SIGNATURE / C. DATE SIGNED L. M. Stinson, Vice President, Farley Project - ~ / ~i. .

COMMENTS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ci C]

iS 116 55 EPA FORM 3510-1 ~8-90)

Attachment I to U.S. EPA Form 351 0-1 Section X. Existing Environmental Permits Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company Aueus( 2005 souThERN~

Existing Environmental Permits Farley Nuclear Plant Permit Name Permit Number Held By NPDES Permit AL0024619 Southern Nuclear Operating Co Water Supply Permit 96-583 Southern Nuclear Operating Co Solid Waste Disposal Facility Permit 3 5-05 , Southern Nuclear Operating Co Certificate of Use 0063.2 Southern Nuclear Operating Co (Issued by Office of Water Resources)

NPDES Construction Stormwater Registration ALRI 60146 Southern Nuclear Operating Co (ADEM Code Ch. 335-6-12)

NPDES Construction Storniwater Registration ALR163388 Southern Nuclear Operating Co (ADEM Code Ch. 335-6-12)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ALO 1-02094-V Southern Nuclear Operating Co (Intake Dredging)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Application Southern Nuclear Operating Co (Barge Slip Dredging) Submitted EPA Form I Attachment 1 Existing Environmental Permits Page 1 of I

Attachment 2 to U.S. EPA Form 351 0-1 Section Xl. Topographic Map Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company Aucust 2005 SOUT4~

I ~I6 L~. . i * *I .1 - I N .600(01 .160 I

i

N .OsslCitfth I I ~ -1 1 P~.000(61

I -. a a - I

S

.5 4 , - ,

4 1

~

I 3 S I

4 - C -2 S - __,* * *41 I ,I i~

4 4 4~

I 4. * ~ :~

4. 15 I 4.

* . . . ,*i* . * - . 1 . , 41 -1~

-4. --- , -* ,- - - _t -

41-, ~ 4 4. 1_I1_4.-. - .

~,_4.,_*41 , ~4 * **

4.,,~ /1

~ :~ ~ ,~

1 ~ t/ 414., - --

/ 4 14. / * -. .

_tItIi,_ I .

-. I **4*, 1, - -----4.

/ / I--- ~ 4

I

4.4 I 5,.

44

-- a a

~

z~~

I 4.-i CS

- */_,_ .

---S. -

I

-,,-~-y~*

UI

~ ,:1-I--Y - U l j ~ :~-~ -~~-

41

,~*1

~8 ~

~tt ~ .4.

/.___ ~

,-;_*. Ii

-*

I -

~ 1 , *, -

/ 5-- /4.

- - 4. 4 4.- --5,S 55*\ -

- /4.

§

-~_______________ a l ~__------------ 1, I

1

~ o~is]o.1.1601 1 4 1 I N,,0ro1214c0 I I,. I N,00.0]ZI,10 1 - -I

U.S. EPA Form 351 O-2C Application for Permit to Discharge Wastewater Consolidated Permits Program Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005

II. Flows, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies A. For each outfall, provide a description of (1) all operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including pro~ess~~r, sanitary wastewater. cooling water, and stormwater runoff; (2) the average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) the ived by the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if necessary.

B. For each outfall, provide a description of (1) all operations contributing wastewater to the effluent. including ~

wastewater. cooling water, and stormwater runoff: (2) the average flow contributed by each operation: and (3) the ~ by

- the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if necessary. __________________________________________________________

1. Outfall 2. Operations Contributing Flow 3. Treatment Number a. OPERATION (list) b. AVERAGEFLOW a. DESCRIPTION b. LIST CODES FROM TABLE 2C-i 001 MAIN COMBINED 81.16 MGD SEE ATTACHED 4-A FACILITY DISCHARGE 005 COOLING TOWER 6.04 M~D SEE ATTACHED 4-A 2-E BLOWDOWN-UNITI ~

006 COOLING TOWER

SEE ATTACHED 4-A OVERFLOW- UNIT I 007 COOLING TOWER 6.04 MGD SEE ATTACHED 4-A 2-E BLOWDOWN-UNIT2_-

008 COOLING TOWER

SEE ATTACHED 4-A OVERFLOW-UNIT 2 009 SEWAGE TREATMENT 0.02 MGD SEE ATTACHED 4-A 2-F PLANT I-V 3-A 012 CHEMICAL METAL

SEE ATTACHED 4-A CLEANING WASTES 013 TREA TED CHROMA TE

SEE A TTACHED BEARING WASTEWA TER 014 WASTE SETTLING POND 0.30 MGD SEE ATTACHED 4-A i-v 015 TURBINE BUILDING

SEE ATTACHED 4-A SUMP-UNITI 016 TURBINE BUILDING

SEE ATTACHED 4-A SUMP- UNIT2

INTERMITTENT FLOWS EPA FORM 351 O-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page 1 of 4 CONTINUED ON REVERSE

EPA ID Number (Copy from Item I ofForm 1) I Form Approved 0MB No. 2040-0086 Please type or p~ntin the u~shadedareas only AL0024619 Approvalexpires 7-31-88 Form j - U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY 2C NPDES I Outfall Location I

EF~4I APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER EXISTING MANUFACTURING, Consolidated COMMERCIAL, Permits MINING Program AND SILVICUTLRAL OPERATIONS For this outfall, list the latitude and longitude, and name of the receiving water(s)

Outfall Latitude Longitude Receiving Water (name)

Number (list) Deg Mm Sec Deg Mm Sec 019-025 31 12 52 85 05 55 CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER Flows, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies A. For each outfall, provide a description of (1) all operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater, cooling water and stormwater runoff: (2) the average flow contributed by each operation: and (3) the treatment received by the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if necessary.

B. For each outfall, provide a description of (1) all operations contributing wastewater to the effluent including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater, cooling water, and stormwater runoff: (2) the average flow contributed by each operation: and (3) the treatment received by the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if necessary.

1. Outfall 2. Operations Contributing Flow 3. Treatment Number a. OPERATION (list) b. AVERAGE FLOW a. DESCRIPTION b. LIST CODES FROM TABLE 2C-1 019 LIQUID RADWASTE

SEE ATTACHED 4-A 2-J

, SYSTEM-UNITI 020 LIQUID RADWASTE

SEE ATTACHED 4-A 2-J SYSTEM- UNIT2 022 RIVER WATER BUILDING

SEE ATTACHED 4-A SUMP-SOUTH 023 RIVER WATER BUILDING

SEE ATTACHED 4-A SUMP-NORTH 030 INTAKE SCREEN

SEE ATTACHED 4-A BACKWASH WATER TO INTAKE CANAL (UNITS I &2) 024 SOUTHEAST YARD

SEEATTACHED 4-A DRAINAGE 025 EAST YARD DRAINAGE

SEE ATTACHED 4-A

INTERMITTENT FLOWS EPA FORM 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page 1 of 4 CONTINUED ON REVERSE

029 31 12 52 85 05 55 CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER II. Flows, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies A For each outfall, provide a description of(1) all operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process~wSt~te, sanitary wastewater. cooling water and stormwater runoff, (2) the average flow contributed by each operation: and (3) the ~e~~~received by the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if necessary.

B For each outfall provide a description of (1) all operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater, cooling water, and stormwater runoff: (2) the average flow contributed by each operation: and (3) the treatment received by the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if necessary. ________________________________________________________

1. Outfall 2. Operations Contributing Flow 3. Treatment Number I a. OPERATION (list) I b. AVERAGE FLOW a. DESCRUDTION b. LIST CODES FROM TABLE 2C-1 026 NORTH WEST YARD

SEEATTACHED 4-A DRAINAGE

4-A 027 NORTHCENTRAL YARD SEE ATTACHED DRAINAGE ~

028 WEST YARD DRAINAGE

SEE ATTACHED 4-A 029 SOUTHWEST YARD SEE ATTACHED 4-A DRAINAGE

INTERMITTENT FLOWS EPA FORM 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page 1 of 4 CONTINUED ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT C. Except for storm runoff, leaks, or spills, are any of the discharges described in Items Il-A or B intermittent or seasonal?

YES (complete the following table) fl NO (go to Section Ill)

3. FREQUENCY 4. FLOW

1. 2. OPERATION(s) a. DAYS b. MONTHS a. FLOW RATE b. TOTAL VOLUME PER YEAR fin mpg~.._ c. DUR-OUTFALL CONTRIBUTING FLOW PER WEEK sclfLwith units NUMBER (/1.91) (specify (specify 1 LONG TERM 2. MAXiMUM 1. LONG TERM 2. MAXiMUM (in days)

(list) average) average) AVERAGE DAiLY AVERAGE DAILY 006 COOLING TOWER SEE OVERFLOW- UNIT I ATTACHED 008 COOLING TOWER SEE OVERFLOW- UNIT 2 ATTACHED 012 CHEMICALMETAL SEE CLEANING WASTES ATTACHED 013 TREATED SEE CHROMATE ATTACHED BEARING WASTEWATER 022 RIVER WATER SEE BUILDING SUMP- ATTACHED SOUTH IlL PRODUCTION A. Does an effluent guideline limitation promulgated by EPA under Section 304 of the Clean Water Act apply to your facility?

YES (complete Item 1/I-B) El NO (go to Section IV)

B. Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (or other measure of operation)?

O YES (complete Item Ill-C) Z NO (go to Section IV)

C. If you answered yes to Item Ill-B, list the quantity which represents an actual measurement of your level of production, expressed in the terms and units tiepd in th~aDnlicahle ~ffluip.nt aukfr1inp. and indicate the affected outfalls.

1. AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION 2 AFFECTED OUTFALLS

a. QUANTiTY PER DAY b. UNiTS OF MEASURE c. OPERATION, PRODUCT, MATERiAL, ETC. (list outfall numbers)

(specify)

N/A IV. IMPROVEMENTS

- - A. Are you now required by any Federal, State, or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the const ruction, upgrading, or operation ofwastewater treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the di scharges described in this application? This includes, but is not limited to, permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, entorcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant or loan conditions.

fl YES (comølete the followino table) NO (oo to Item IV-B)

2. AFFECTED OUTFALLS 4. FINAL

1. IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION, 3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT COMPLIANCE DATE AGREEMENT, ETC. a. No b. SOURCE OF DISCHARGE a. REQ- b. PRO-UIRED JECTED N/A B. OPTIONAL: You may attacn additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect your discharges) you now have underway or which y ou plan. Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned, and indicate your actual or planned schedules for construction.

MARK X IF DES CRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAM IS ATTACHED EPA FORM 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page 2 of 4 CONTINUED ON PAGE 3

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT C. Except for storm runoff, leaks, or spills, are any of the discharges described in Items Il-A or B intermittent or seasonal? ~

___~ YES (complete the following table) 0 NO (go to Section III) .~

3. FREQUENCY 4.FLOW~~~

1. 2. OPERATION(s) a. DAYS b, MONTHS a. FLOW RATE b. TOTAL ~

OUTFALL CONTRIBUTING FLOW PER WEEK PER YEAR (in mgd) e~~_~pit~, c. DUR-NUMBER (llst) (specify (~pecify 1. LONC TERM 2 MAXIMUM 1 LONG TE~ (in days)

(list) ______________________ averaged average) AVERAGE DAILY AVERAGE LV __________

023 RIVER WATER SEE BUILDING SUMP - ATTACHED NORTH 024 SOUTHEAST YARD SEE DRAINAGE ATTACHED 025 EAST YARD SEE DRAINAGE ATTACHED 026 NORTHWEST YARD SEE DRAINAGE ATTACHED 027 NORTHCENTRAL SEE YARVVHi4INA~iL I~IIAt.t~L III. PRODUCTION i.Does an effluent guideline limitation promulgated by EPA under Section 304 of the Clean Water Act apply to your ~

YES (complete Item Ill-B) 0 NO (go to Section IV)

.3. Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (or other measure of operat~~~j~

YES (complete Item Ill-C) NO (go to Section IV)

C. If you answered yes to Item Ill-B, list the quantity which represents an actual measurement of your level of productio ~fin the terms 3nd units used in the applicable effluent guideline, and indicate the affected outfalls.

1. AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION FECTED FALLS aG JANTITY N/APER DAY b. UN1I5 OF MEASURE C. OPERATION, PRODUcT. MA1ERIAL ETC. II numbers) specify) r T

~

IV. I A. by any Federal, ~ ~t any implementation ofwastewater treatment equipment I er environmental programs which r This includes but is not Ii Jitions administrative or enforcers letters, stipulations, court orders, and ins, El YES (~

OF CONDITION, 2. AFFECTED OUTFALLS 3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ETC. a. No b. SOURCE OF DISCHARGE ED B. OPTIONAL: You may attacn additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect your discharges) you now have underway or which you plan Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned, and indicate your actual or planned schedules for construction.

El MARK X IF DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAM IS ATTACHED EPA FORM 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page 2 of 4 CONTINUED ON PAGE 3

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT C. Except for storm runoff, leaks, or spills, are any ofthe discharges described in Items Il-A or B intermittent or seasonal?

t~1 YES (complete the following table) El NO (go to Section III)

3. FREQUENCY 4. FLOW

1. 2. OPERATION(s) a. DAYS b. MONTHS a. FLOW RATE b. TOTALVOLUME PER WEEK PER YEAR Jinrngg)_~_ (specify with units c. DUR-OUTFALL CONTRIBUTING FLOW ATION NUMBER (list) (specify (specify t LONG TERM average) average) 2 MAXIMUM I LONG TERM 2 MAXIMUM (in days)

(list) AYERAGE DAILY AVERAGE DAILY 028 WEST YARD SEE DRAINAGE ATTACHED 029 SOUTHWEST YARD SEE DRAINAGE ATTACHED 030 INTAKE SCREEN SEE BACKWASHWA TER ATTACHED (UNITS_I_&_2) 015 TURBINE BUILDING SEE SUMP-UNITI ATTACHED 016 TURBINE BUILDING SEE SUMP - UNIT 2 ATTACHED 1

III. PRODUCTION A. Does an effluent guideline limitation promulgated by EPA under Section 304 of the Clean Water Act apply to your facility?

YES (complete Item Ill-B) El NO (go to Section IV)

B. Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (or other measure ofoperation)?

El YES (complete Item Ill-C) NO (go to Section IV)

C. If you answered yes to Item Ill-B, list the quantity which represents an actual measurement of your level of production, expressed in the terms and units used in the applicable effluent guideline, and indicate the affected outfalls.

1. AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION 2. AFFECTED I OUTFALLS a QUANTITY PER DAY b. UNITS OF MEASURE C OPERATION PRODUCT. MATERIAl, FIC (list outfall numbers)

(specify)

N/A IV. IMPROVEMENTS A. Are you now required by any Federal, State, or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading, or operation of wastewater treatment equip ment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This includes, but is not limited to, permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant or loan conditions.

El YES (complete the following table) NO (go to Item lV-B)

4. FINAL

2. AFFECTED OUTFALLS

1. IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION. 3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT COMPLIANCE DATE AGREEMENT, ETC. a. No b. SOURCE OF DISCHARGE a. REQ- b. PRO-UIRED JECTED N/A B. OPTIONAL: You may attach additional sheets describing any additio nal water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect your discharges) you now have underway or which y ou plan. Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned, and indicate your actual or planned schedules for construction.

El MARK X IF DES CRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAM IS ATTACHED EPA FORM 351 O-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page 2 of 4 CONTINUED ON PAGE 3

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT C. Except for storm runoff, leaks, or spills, are any of the discharges described in Items Il-A or B intermittent or seasonal?~~

___________ YES (complete the following table) El NO ~goto Section Ilk)

3. FREQUENCY 4. FLOW

1. 2. OPERATION(s) a. DAYS b. MONTHS a. FLOW RATE I b. TOTAL VOLUME OUTFALL CONTRIBUTING FLOW PER WEEK PE~YEAR ~m~_ - 4 (specify with units C~DUR NUMBER (list) (specify (~pec,fy 1 LONG TERM 2 MAXIMUM 1 LONG TERM 2. MAXiMuM (in days)

(Iist% average) average) AVERAGE DAILY AVERAGE DAILY 019 LIQUID RADWASTE SEE SYSTEM - UNIT I ATTACHED 020 LIQUID RADWASTE SEE SYSTEM - UNIT 2 ATTACHED N/A IV. IMPROVEMENT~fl A Are you now required by any , or 10 meet any implementa~,onschec operation of wastewater treatment equipment or prac her environmental programs which rr this application? This includes, but is not limited ditions, administrative or enforceme schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant s.

El YES (complete I ble) NO (go I

1. IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION, 2. AFFECTED OUTFALL~ 3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF~ E AGREEMENT, ETC. a. No b. SOURCE OF DISC E .... .

JECTED N/A B OPTIONAL You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect your discharges) you now have underway or which you plan Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned, and indicate your actual or planned schedules for construction.

El MARK X IF DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAM IS ATTACHED EPA FORM 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page 2 of 4 CONTINUED ON PAGE 3

EPA ID Number (Copy from Item I ofForm I)

CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 AL0024619AL0024619 A, B, & C: See instructions before proceeding - Complete one set of tables or each outfall - Annotate the outfall number in the space provided.

NOTE: Tables V-A, V-B, and V-C are included on separate sheets number V-i through V-9. - -

D: Use the space below t list any of the pollutants listed in Tables 2c-3 of the instructions, which you know or have reason to believe is discharged or may be discharged from any outfall. For every pollutant you list, briefly describe the reasons you believe it to be present and report any analytical data in your possession.

1.POLLUTANT 2. SOURCE 1. POLLUTANT 2. SOURCE NONE Vi POTENTIAL DISCHARGES NOT COVERED BY ANALYSIS Is any pollutant listed in Item V-C a substance or a component of a substance which you currently use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or byproduct?

El YES (list all such pollutants below) NO (qo to Item Vl-B)

N/A EPA FORM 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page 3 of 4 CONTINUED ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT VII. BIOLOGICAL TOXICITY TESTING DATA Do you have any knowledge or reason to believe that any.

receiving water in relation to your discharge within the last 3,,

YES (identify the test(s) and ANNUAL BIOMONITORING AS REQUIRED BY EXISTING NPDES PERMIT ON THE MAIN COMBINED FACILITY DISCHARGE (DSNOOI).

VIII. CONTRACT ANALYSIS INFORMATION Were any of the analyses reported in Item V performel ory or consu -. rm?

~ YES (list the name, address, of and pollutants El NO (go analyzed by, a C. TELE ED A. NAME B. ADDRESS (area code & no.)

Alabama Power Building No. 8 (205) 664-6194 /.llexcept~ ~,

Company General Test P.O. Box 2641 temperature, chlorine, Laboratory Birmingham, AL 35291 and radiological.

Florida Radiochemistry 5456 Hoffner Avenue (407) 382-7733 Radiological Services, Inc. Suite 201 Orlando, FL 32812

(

( )

(__

(

I

)_____

i~~ERTIFICATION

I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted Is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility offine and imprisonment forknowing violations.

A. NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE (type or print) B. PHONE NO. (area code & no.)

L. M. Stinson, Vice President, Farley Project (205) 992-5000 C. SIGNATURE D. DATE SIGNED

~ /i. S/~

EPA FORM 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page 4 of 4

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or EPA ID. NIJMBER (copyfrom Item I of Form I) all of this information on s-----e sheets (use the same format) instead of completing AL0024619 r~ nt p

1. POLLUTANT

a. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOO) <2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <2 n/a I xygen

~ieCm~~ 4 1,340 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 4 1,090 1 Total Organic Carbon 2 43 814 3 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day _2 27 618 7 1 d.Total Suspended Solids 12 4,021 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 9 2,453 1 e.Ammonia(asN) 0.16 53.6 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.11 30.0 1 Value Value Value Value

t. Flow 105.02 88.60 79.87 MGD n/a 72.00 1,277 Value Value Value

g. Temperature (winter) Value 23.0 20.7 16.7 47 °~ 12.8 47

h. Temperature (summer) Value Value Value Value {

39.0 34.2 31.5 45 °C I Minimum Maximum ~

i. pH 6.04 7.95 C L.L_7.61 PART 8 Mark X n coiumn 2 a for each polk mark column 2a for any pollutant wh one analysis for that pollutant. For L,..

dIscharge Complete one table for each 1 POLLUT 2MARKX J__________________

ANT AND ~ ~ a. MAXIMUM DAILY CAS NO (if ~ VALUE 1) I )

available) CO~CETRA ~ (ONCENTRAT~ON

~ LI ~ <0.02 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.02 n/a I bChlorine, El 0 22 63 2 0 13 41 2 0 09 26 0 1,099 mg/I kg/day <0.01 n/a I Residual c.Color El 28 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I PCU n/a 17 n/a I Fecal LI <1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I col/100 n/a 10 2,726 1 oiom ml (16984-48-8) El ~ 0.12 40.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.12 32.7 1 Nitrite as N) ~{LI 0.500 167.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.38 103.6 j I EPA FORM 351 O-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page V-I CONTINUE ON REVERSE

ITEM V.B CONTINUED FROM FRONT

1. POLLUT- 2. EFFLUEN T________________ 3. UNITS 4. INTAKE (opt!anal)

ANT AND SE. a SE. a. MAXIMUM DAILY b. MAXIMuM 30 DAY VALUE c. LONG TERMAVRG, VALUE (specify ifblank) a. LONG TERM LIEVED AS.

UEVED VALUE (Ifavailable) d. NO. OF .~ AVERA~ VALUE b. NO~OF CAS NO. (if PRES.

~IT SENT (Ifavailable) ill ANALYSIS a,CONcEN. b. MASS ANALYSES available) COSCENTRATIO N

CRASS CONCENTRATION i2iMASS CONCENTRAT1OS AiMASR TRATION ti ccurs~sas - oieass

g. Nitrogen, El 0.330 110.6 n/a Total Organic n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.35 95.4 1 (asN)

h. Oil and LI <1.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a mg/I Grease n/a I kg/day <1.4 n/a I

i. Phosphorus (asP), Total Z El 0.13 43.6 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.12 32.7 1

~14-0

j. Radioactivity (I) Alpha, LI Total <0.6 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I pCi/I n/a <0.8 n/a I (2) Beta, Total LI 3.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I pCi/I n/a 2.8 n/a I (3) Radium, Total Z El <0.9 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I pCi/I n/a <0.9 n/a I (4) Radium El 0.1 n/a n/a n/a 226, Total n/a n/a I pCi/I n/a 0.3 n/a I

k. Sullate (as SO )

4 IZI El 7.96 2,667.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 6.05 1,648.9 1

~-79-8 I. Sulfide (asS) El 0.13 43.6 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.06 16.4 1

m. Sulfite (as El SO. )( <0.25 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.25 n/a I 5

14265-45-3)

Surtactants El 0.01 3.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a I kg/day 0.02 5.5 I

o. Aluminum, Total Z LI 1.27 425.6 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 1.26 343.4 1 (7429-90-5)

~i.Barium.

Total El 0.030 10.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.030 8.2 1

~ ~__

q. Boron, Total El 0.060 20.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.010 2.7 1

~42-8

r. Cobalt, Total LI <0.004 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.004 n/a ~

I 17440-48-4)

s. Iron, Total (7439-89-4) El 1.30 435.6 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 1.54 419.7 I I, Magnesium, Total El 1.90 636.7 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 1.74 474.2 1 (7439-95-4) ..~

u. Molybdenum, Total El ~ <0.01 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.01 n/a I I7439~98-7),.

v. Manganese, Total El 0.099 33.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.182 49.6 I 17439-96-51 ._

w. Tin, Total 1.1 I (7440-31-5) El <0.002 ND n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.004

~__________

x. Titanium, Total ~ El 0.030 10.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.028 7.6 1 (7440-32-6)

EPA FORM 351 O-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page V-2 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-3

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item 1 of Form 1) fOUTFALL NUMBER CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FORM 2.C AL0024619 1 DSNOOI PART c - If you are a primary industry and this outtal Contains process wastewater. refer to Table 2c-2 in the instructions to determine which of the GCIMS fractions you must test for. Mark X in column 2-a for au such GC/MS fractions that apply to your industry and for ALL toxic metals, cyanides. and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondary indusfnes. nonprocess wastewater outfalls. and non-required GC/MS fractions), mark X in column 2-b for each poiutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark X in column 2-c for each pollutant you believe is absent. If you mark column 2a for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at east one analysis for that pollutant. If you mark column 2b for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. If you know or have reason to believe it will be discharged in co centratiorm of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark coumn 2b for acrolein. acrylonitrile. 2.4 dinitrophenol, or 2.methyl-4, 6 dinitrophenol. you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise, for pollutants for which you mark column 2b. you must either submit at least one analysis or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part please review each carefully. Complete one table (all 7 pages) for each outfall. See instructions for additional details and requirements. .. .,.j.....

1 POLLUT- 2. MARK X - 2. EFFLUENT 3 3 UNITS L 4. INTAKE (optional)

ANT AND a. TEST- b. BE- c. BE. a. MAXIMUM DAILY b MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE C. LONG TERM AVRG. (snecify if blank) a LONG TERM CAS NO (if ING RE- LIEVED LIEVED VALUE (ifavailable) VALUE d. NO. OF I__________________________________________

AVERAGE VALUE b NO. OF QUIRED PRE- ABSENT (Ifavailable) ANALVSI ANALYSES available) SENT uiiroru-i-i.r.

RAT ON 121 MASS mcoNci.Ni.

RATIOT. i7iMASS iliCONCi NT.

RATiON 171 MASS 1 i ~

CONCEN. I i

CO N C 2VR,T TRATION METALS, CYANIDE, AND TOTAL PHENOLS

~An1i~~ ~ -fl ~ ~ ~ ~j/~ n/a n/a - n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.012 n/a I if 440-36-Ui 2M.Arsenic, El Z <0005 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.005 n/a I

~_

3M. Beryllium, El <0.001 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I (7440~l-7)

~a~a~Jmam El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I 17440-43-9) 3M Chromium, Z LI El 0.012 4.11 0.012 4.11 0.001 0.46 43 mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I (7440-47-3)

~opper. El El 0.009 3.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.005 1.36 1 (7440-50-81 ~._.

~~otaI El <0.004 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.004 n/a I 3M Mercury, El <0.0002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0002 n/a I

~97-6_________ -

9MNickel, El <0.004 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.004 n/a I (7440-02-0)

S~um, Z El <0.005 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.005 n/a I (7782-49-2)

~Su~er, Z El <0.006 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.006 n/a I (7440-22-4)

Total El <0.007 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.007 n/a I (7440-28.0) ~ ~

Z~, El 0.011 3.7 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.005 1.36 1 (7440-66-6) ~___________

cyanu~, El <0.005 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.005 n/a I (57-12-5) 15M Phenols, El 0.01 2.6 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.01 2.7 1 1W~

~3,7,8-Tetra- El DESCRIBE RESULTS ChkDrocbbenZo-NOT TESTED (1764--01-6)

EPA FORM 351 O-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page V-3 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT

1. POLLUT- ~_. 2. MARK X ______

ANT AND a. TEST- b. I - C. E -. a. MA)

CAS NO. (if QL L -

available)

I L CC/MS - VOLATILE COMPOUNDS IV Acrolein (107-02-8) El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I 2V Acryionuirtlie (107-13-1) El <0.001 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I 3V Benzene (71-43-2) El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I 4V AiS (Chk,ro-methyl) Ether El El n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 (p42-88-1) 5V Bromoform (75-25-2) Z El <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I 6V Carbon Tetrachioride ~ El Z <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I (56-23-5)

TV ChioroboVEose (108-90-7) Z El <0.001 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I 8V Chiorodi-bromomethane ~ El <0.001 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I (124-48-1) 9V Chioroethane (75-00-3) El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I 1OV 2-Chloro-ethylvinyl Ether El <0.001 n/a n/a - nZa n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I (110-75-8) liv Chloroform (67.66-3) Z 0.0022 0.74 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I I 2V DiChloro-bromoethane El IZI <0.001 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I (75-71-8) 1 3V Dichloro-dul uoromethane (75-71-8)

El El n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 14V 1.1-OiChioro-etnane Z El Z <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I (75-34-3) iSV 12 DiChoro-ethane El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I

~6-2 ISV 1,1 OuChioro-n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I ethylene (75335-41 Z El <0.001 n/a n/a 17V 1,2-Dichioro-El n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I propane Z <0.002 n/a n/a n/a (78-87-5) isV 1,3-DiChioro-n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I propylene El <0.001 n/a n/a n/a (542-76-6) 19V n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I Ethylbenzene El <0.002 n/a n/a (100-41-4) 20V Methyl Bromide El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I (74-83-91 21V Methyl n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I Chloride El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a

~ ~- -_____ -~

Page V-4 CONTINUE ON PAGE V.5 EPA FORM 351 O-2C (Rev. 2-85)

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item lof Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER CONTINUED FROM PAGE V.4 A DSf~11 1 POLLUT- ___ 2. MARK X ANT AND a. TEST- b. I GAS NO (if ING RE- L~

available) QUIRED GC/MS VOLATILE COMPOUNDS (continued)

.ru V MAiilYiAS~

Chloride (75-09-21 El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I 23V1i2.2-Toira-

~Ic~r~e 1~

iane El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I 24VTetraohioro-El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I 25V Toluene

~i~ans.

El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I j~g~kg/day <0.002 n/a I o~c~o~etg~ene El <0.001 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I

~~1,1,l-Tri-

~~ane El <0.001 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I

~o~an~ El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I 29V Trichloro-(79~16) El Z <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I 30V Trichloro-fluoromethane El El ~ n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0

~ ~ El ~ <0.001 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I CC/MS FRACTION ACID COMPOUNDS

~oi~Pheoot Z El <0.0033 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0033 n/a I

~A~Duch;oro-

~ El <0.0027 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0027 n/a I 3A2~.Donethyi.

~ El <0.0027 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0027 n/a I 6Davtro-El <0.024 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.024 n/a I

~2~ 4 1D1nitro~ El n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.042 n/a I 0 1 ~ <0.042

~2~itro-El ~ <0.0036 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0036 n/a I El Z <0.0024 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0024 n/a 1

~

~ <0.0030 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0030 n/a I MC~s~ El kg/day <0.0036 n/a I

~t~t~~nol El ~ <0.0036 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I n/a n/a n/a 1 kg/day <0.0015 n/a I (10I-95-~ El <0.0015 n/a n/a

~ mg/I kg/day <0.0027 n/a I

~-2 El <0.0027 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I Page V-5 CONTINUE ON REVERSE EPA FORM 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85)

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT

2. MARK X

1. POLLUT- I_________________________ 2. EFFLUENT ~ 3, UNITS 4. INTAKE (optio~jj~~

ANT AND a. TEST- j b. BE- I c. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE

b. MAXIMUM30 DAY VALUE C. LONG TERMAVRG, VALUE d. NO. OF (specify ifblank) a. LONG TERM AVERAGE VALUE b. NO, OF CAS NO (If ING RE- LIEVED LIEVED (ifaviabie) (If available) ANALYSt ~ ANALYSES QUIRED PRE- ABSENT )l)CONCENT-available) SENT RATiON (21 MASS (IIcONcENT.

S a. b. MASS ~

CoNceiTwTlos IOu MOSS (IICONCENT-RATION i 121 MASS RATION 121 MASS CONCEN.

~ TRATION ~ ~ ~

GCIMS FRACTION - BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS lB Aoenphthnoe (83-32-9) 2B Acer,ophiyieoe L El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I (208-96-8) El <0.0035 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I kg/day <0.0035 n/a I 3B Anthracene (120-12-7) El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I 48 Benzidine (92-87-5) Z El <0.044 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I kg/day <0.044 n/a I SB Benzo (a)

Anthracene El <0.0078 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0078 n/a I (56-55-3) 68 Benzo (a)

Pyrene (50-32-A) Z El <0.0025 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I kg/day <0.0025 n/a I 78 3.4-Benzo-fluoranthene El Z <0.0048 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0048 n/a I (205-99-2) 88 Benzo (ghi)

Perylene El ~l <0.0041 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0041 n/a I (191-24-2) 9B Benzo (k)

Fluoranthene (207-08-9)

El <0.0025 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0025 n/a I 108 Bis (2-Chloroethoxy) El <0,0053 n/a n/a - WW n/~ n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0053 n/a I Methane

)1l1-91-1) ~________

rro Be (2 Chloe, clOy!) Ether

~4-4 El <0.0057 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0057 n/a I 128 8is (2-Ch!oro,sepropyl) El <0.0057 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0057 n/a I Ether 1102 60-1 1 3B BiV(2-Eihyl.

hooyl) Phthaiate El <0.0025 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day 0.0084 2.29 1

~1-7 14 8 4-Bromo-mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I phenyl Phenyl El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I

~i01-55-3_

lOB Butyl Benzyi Z <0.0025 n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0025 n/a I Phthaiate 185-68-7)

El n/a 168 2-Chloro-El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I naphthalene

~-7 178 4-Chloro- n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0042 n/a I phenyl Phenyl Ether (7005-72-3)

Z El <0.0042 n/a 188 Chrysene El <0.0025 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0025 n/a I (218-01.9) 18B Dibenno(oh)

<0.0025 n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0025 n/a I Anthracene El n/a n/a n/a (53-70-3) 208 1 .2-DichiotO-n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I benzene (95-50-1)

El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a ~

n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I 2iB i,3-Oichioro-benzene IZI El El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a

~Z3)iL EPA FORM 3510-2C (ReV. 2-85) PageV-6 CONTINUEON PAGE V-7

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form I) OUTFALL NUMBER CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-6 AL0024619 DSNOOI 1 POLLUTL~ 2 MARK X 2 EFFLUENT I 3 UNITS 4 INTAKE (optional)

ANT AND a. TEST- I b. BE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY b MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE C. LONG TERM AVRG. (specify if blank) a. LONG TERM

~ ~ ,~ INC RE- LIEVED LIEVED VALUE (if available) VALUE d. NO.OF AVERAGE VALUE b. NO. OF QUIRED PRE- ABSENT (Ifavailable) ANALYSI -. ANALYSES

- available) .L SENT Ii~c 0~

NT. 12iMASS ili~Or~CEN1- i2iMASS ri~g~NT. I2IMA5S S a.CONCEN- b. MASS c0SCE~I~Ro-S ,,aonr GCIMS . BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued) 22B 1,4-Diohloro-benzene (106-46-7)

El <0.0044 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0044 n/a I 235 33.D,chloro-benzidine El <0.0165 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0165 n/a I 791-94-I) 24B Diethyl Phthalate (84-66-2)

El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I 259 Dimethyl Phthalate Z El <0.0016 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.00 16 n/a I (131-11-3) 26B Di-N-Butyl Phthalate El <0.0025 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0025 n/a I

~1-3 ~

275 2,4-O!nitro-toluene

~4-2 Z El <0.0057 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0057 n/a I 285 2,8-Oinitro-toluene

~0-2 El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I 298 Di-N-Octyl Phthalate Z El <0.0025 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0025 n/a I (117-84-0) 3SB l,2-Dipheoyl-hydrazine (as Azo-henzene)

El Z <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I (122-66-7) 315 Fluoronthene (206-44-0) El <0.0022 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0022 n/a I 32B Fluorene (86-73-7) El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I - mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I 338 Hess-chlorobenzene El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I

~4-1 348 Hexa-chiorobutodiene El El Z <0.0009 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0009 n/a I (87-68-3) 35B Hexachioro-cyClopeniadiene El <0.001 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.001 n/a I (77-47-4) 368 Hesa-chloroethane El <0.0016 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0016 n/a I (67-72-1) 375 indeno (1.2,3-cd) Pyrene El <0.0037 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0037 n/a I

~9-5 ~_

385 sophorone (78-59-I) El <0.0022 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0022 n/a I 385 Naptlro!one (91-20-3) El El Z <0.0016 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0016 n/a I 4GB Nitrobenzene (98-95-3) El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I 4I8 N-Nitro-oodimelhy!amine El Z <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I (62-75-9) 428 N-Nitrnsdi.N-Propyiamine El <0.002 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.002 n/a I i~84ZL.. ~.. ~

EPA FORM 351 O-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page V.7 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT

2. MARK X POLLUT- I________________________ 2, EFFLUENT 3. UNITS 4. INTAKE (optio~fl)_

AND a.TEST- b. BE- c. BE- a. MAXIMUM DAILY b. MAXIMUM30 DAY VALUE (if available)

C. LONG TERM AVRG, VALUE d. NO. OF (specify if blank) a. LONG TERM AVERAGE. VALUE b.NO. OF VALUE NO. (if ING RE- LIEVED LIE VED ANALYSt ,~ ~ ANALISES PRE. ABSENT QUIRED j SENT lilcoscENT-RATION 121 MASS 1l)coNcENT.

RATION (2)MASS (IICONCENT-RATiON

~

(2(M580 s a. CONCEN-TRATION

b. MASS Ill 0080611T8A1108

~,

1915085

~, ~,

FRACTION . BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued) ti-Nilro-Z El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I Phononlhreno El <0.0054 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I kg/day <0.0054 n/a I Pyrene El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I 1,2,4-Tn-El <0.0019 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.0019 n/a I FRACTION - PESTICIDES El El <0003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I El El <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I El El <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I El El <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I Chlordane El El <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I El El <0.003 n/a n/a - n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I El El <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I 4,4-DDD El El <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I j~g/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I Dieldnin El El <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I is-Encto-El El Z <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I

((-Endo-El El <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I Endonulfan El El <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I

~___________

El <0.001 n/a n/a n/a I kg/day <0.001 n/a I El n/a n/a El El <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I 1-93-4)

Hepta-El n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I El <0.003 n/a n/a n/a EPA FORM 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) PageV-8 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-9

EPA ID. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form I) OUTFALL NUMBER CONTINUED FROM PAGE V.6 I as an ANT AND a. TEST-MC~/f ING RE- L.~J LII QUIRED PRE- AB~.ENT alabi j GCIMS - PESTICIDES (continued) 17P Heptacfl~or Expxide (1024-57-31 18P PCB-1 242 (53469-21-9) LI LI <0.005 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I kg/day <0.005 n/a I 19PPCB-1254 ~

(11097-69-I) U LI <0.005 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.005 n/a I 20P PCB-1221 (11 104-28-2) LI LI <0.005 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.005 n/a I 21P PCB-1232 (1 1141-16-5) LI LI <0.005 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.005 n/a I 22P PCB-l 248 (12672-29-6) LI LI <0.005 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.005 n/a I 23P PCB-1260 (11096-82-5) LI LI <0.005 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.005 n/a I 24P PCB-1016 (12674-I 1-2) LI LI <0.005 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.005 n/a I 25PToxa- ri phene

~35-2____________

U LI <0.003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I mg/I kg/day <0.003 n/a I EPA FORM 351 O-2C (Rev. 2-85) Page V-9

Attachment Ito U.S. EPA Form 351 O-2C Section hA. Line Drawing Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operatine Company Aucust 2005 SOUThE

Farley Nuclear Plant Line Drawing/Water Permit No. AL0024619 Bal CHATTAH000HEE RIVER Note: Flow values provided in the attached descriptive information are approximate values or ranges of normal operation.

As such, the water flows may not exactly balance.

DSNO12 and DSNO13 have no specific designated discharge points.

Attachment 2 to U.S. EPA Form 3510-2C Section IVA and B. Intake and Effluent Characteristics Chemical Analysis Reports Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No, AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operatine Company Aucust 2005 SOUThER~1~

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205)664-6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPINTK Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 05-May-05 Customer ID: AL-0024619 Delivery Date: 05-May-OS

Description:

FNP - Intake Water Repermitting - Grab Sample Laboratory ID Number: AJ12232 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Genera! Characteristics Flow KD 5/5/2005 Field Test 0.000 72.00 MGD Field pH RKB 5/5/2005 EPA 150.1 0.00 7.03 SU Temperature MAR 5/5/2005 Field Data 0. 19 Deg. C.

Chlorine, Total Residual RKB 5/5/2005 Field Test 0.01 Not Detected mg/I This CertifiCate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments:

cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control ________________________ Supervision_____________________________ Date: 18-May-OS Page 1 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 ALABAMA Birmingham, Alabama 35291 POWER (205)664 - 6081 A SOMTHLRM COMPANY CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPINTK Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date 05-May-OS Customer ID: AL-002461 9 Delivery Date: 05-May-05

Description:

FNP - Intake Water Repermitting - Grab Sample Laboratory ID Number: AJ12230 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Metals, Cyanide, Total Phenols Cyanide, Total HRG 5/11/2005 EPA 335.2 0.005 Not Detected mg/I Phenol, Total HRG 5/19/2005 EPA 420.1 0.01 0.01 mg/I Genera! Characteristics Coliform - Fecal HRG 5/6/2005 SM 92220 1. 10. colonies/100 Oil and Grease RDA 5/10/2005 EPA 1664 1.4 Not betected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as submitted.

Comments:

cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control Supervision, Date: 25-May-05 Page 1 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664- 6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPINTK Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-OS Customer ID: AL-0024619 Delivery Date : 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP - Intake Water Repermitting Composite Sample Laboratory ID Number: AJ15117 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Volatile Compounds Acrolein JCC 6/9/2005 EPA 603 0.002 Not Detected mg/I Acrylonitrile JCC 6/9/2005 EPA 603 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Benzene RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Bromoform RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0030 Not Detected mg/I Carbon Tetrachloride RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Chlorobenzene RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Chlorodibromomethane RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Chloroethane RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Chloroform RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Dichlorobromomethane RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,1-Dichloroethane RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,2-Dichloroethane RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,1-Dichloroethylene RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,2-Dichloropropane RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropylene RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I trans-i ,3-Dichloropropylene RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Ethylbenzene RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Methyl Bromide RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Methyl Chloride RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 00020 Not Detected mg/I Methylene Chloride RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Tetcachloroethylene RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 00020 Not Detected mg/I Toluene RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 00020 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,2-trans-Dichloroethylene RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1,1 ,1-Trichloroethane RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 00010 Not Detected mg/I 1,1 ,2-Trichloroethane RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Trichloroethylene RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments: COMPOSITE SAMPLE.

Note:

Cr analysis performed by analyst JA3 is TOTAL RECOVERABLE, and analysis performed by FKK isTotal Cr (01034).

CCS 8/15/OS cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control Supervision_____________________________ Date: 15-Aug-OS Page 1 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664 -6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPINTK Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-OS Customer ID: AL-OO24619 Delivery Date: 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP - Intake Water Repermitting Composite Sample Laboratory ID Number: AJ15117 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Volatile Compounds Vinyl Chloride RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Pesticides Aldrin RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I alpha-BHC RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I beta-BHC RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I delta-BHC RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I gamma-BHC (Lindane) RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Chlordane RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I 4,4p-DDT RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not betected mg/I 4,4p-DDE RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I 4,4p-DDD RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Dieldrin RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I alpha-Endosulfan RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I beta-Endosulfan RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Endosulfan sulfate RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Endrin RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Endrin aldehyde RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Heptachlor RAH 6/23/2005 ~PA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Heptachlor epoxide RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I PCB, Aroclor 1242 RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I PCB, Aroclor 1254 RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I PCB, Aroclor 1221 RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I PCB, Aroclor 1232 RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0,005 Not Detected mg/I PCB, Aroclor 1248 RAH 6/23/2005 ~PA608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I PCB, Aroclor 1260 RAH 6/23/2005 ~PA608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I PCB, Aroclor 1016 RAH 6/23/2005 ~PA608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I Toxaphene RAH 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments: COMPOSITE SAMPLE.

Note:

Cr analysis performed by analyst JA3 is TOTAL RECOVERABLE, and analysis performed by FKK isTotal Cr (01034).

CCS - 8/15/OS cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control ________________________ Supervision_____________________________ Date: 15-Aug-OS Page 2 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205)664-6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPINTK Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-OS Customer ID: AL-O024619 Delivery Date: 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP - Intake Water Repermitting Composite Sample Laboratory lDNumber: AJ15117 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Metals, Cyanide, Total Phenols Aluminum, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.018 1.26 mg/I Antimony, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.012 Not Detected mg/I Arsenic, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.005 Not Detected mg/I Barium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.002 0.030 mg/I Beryllium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Boron, Total JA3 6/1 7/2005 EPA 200.7 , 0.003 0.010 mg/I Cadmium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.002 Not Detected mg/I Chromium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.001 0.002 mg/I Chromium, Total FKK 8/12/2005 EPA 200.7 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Cobalt, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.004 Not Detected mg/I Copper, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.005 0.005 mg/I Iron, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.003 1.54 mg/I Lead, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.004 Not Detected mg/I Magnesium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.026 1.74 mg/I Manganese, Total JA3 6/1 7/2005 EPA 200.7 0.004 0.182 mg/I Mercury, Total RDA 6/9/2005 EPA 245.1 0.0002 Not Detected mg/I Molybdenum, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.01 Not Detected mg/I Nickel, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.004 Not Detected mg/I Selenium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.005 Not Detected mg/I Silver, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.006 Not Detected mg/I Thallium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.007 Not Detected mg/I Tin, Total JA3 6/1 7/2005 EPA 200.7 0.002 0.004 mg/I Titanium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.003 0.028 mg/I Zinc-Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA200.7 0.004 0.005 mg/I General Characteristics Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day HRG 6/13/2005 SM 521OB 2. Not Detected mg/I Chemical Oxygen Demand RDA 6/23/2005 EPA 410.4 1. 4 mg/I Total Organic Carbon KRC 6/1 0/2005 EPA 415.1 0.30 2.27 mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments: COMPOSITE SAMPLE.

Note:

Cr analysis performed by analyst JA3 is TOTAL RECOVERABLE, and analysis performed by FKK isTotal Cr (01034).

CCS - 8/15/05 cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control ________________________ Supervision_____________________________ Date: 15-Aug-OS Page 3 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664 - 6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPINTK Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-OS Customer ID: AL-0O24619 Delivery Date : 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP - Intake Water Repermitting Composite Sample Laboratory ID Number: AJ15117 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units General Characteristics Solids - Suspended HRG 6/9/2005 EPA 160,2 1. 9. mg/I Nitrogen, Ammonia EMH 6/10/2005 EPA 350.1 0.01 0.11 mg/I as N Bromide EMH 6/27/2005 EPA 300.0 0.02 Not Detected mg/I Color HRG 6/8/2005 EPA 110.3 0. 17. PCU Fluoride EMH 6/16/2005 EPA 340.2 0.02 0.12 mg/I Nitrogen, Nitrate/Nitrite EMH 6/8/2005 353.2/CALc 0.01 0.380 mg/I as N Nitrogen, Total Organic EMH 6/10/2005 EPA 351.3 0.01 0.350 mg/I as N Phosphorus, Total HRG 6/14/2005 EPA 365.2 0.01 0.12 mg/I as P Sulfate EMH 6/27/2005 EPA 300.0 1.0 6.05 mg/I Sulfide FKK 6/14/2005 EPA 376.2 0.01 0.06 mg/I Sulfite FKK 6/8/2005 EPA 377.1 0.25 Not Detected mg/I Surfactants (Foaming Agents) RDA 6/8/2005 EPA 425.1 0.01 0.02 mg/I Nitrogen, Nitrate EMH 6/8/2005 EPA 353.2 0.01 0.37 mg/I as N Nitrogen, Nitrite EMH 6/8/2005 EPA 353.2 0.01 0.01 mg/I as N Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl EMH 6/15/2005 EPA 351.2 0.01 0.46 mg/I as N Base/Neutral Compounds Acenaphthene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Acenaphthylene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0035 Not Detected mg/I Anthracene RAH 6/29/2005 ~PA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Benzidine RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.044 Not Detected mg/I Benzo(a)anthracene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0078 Not Detected mg/I Benzo(a)pyrene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I 3,4-Benzofluoranthene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0048 Not Detected mg/I Benzo(g,h,i)perylene RAH 6/29/2005 ~PA 625 0.0041 Not Detected mg/I Benzo(k)fluoranthene RAH 6/29/2005 ~PA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0053 Not Detected mg/I Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0057 Not Detected mg/I Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0057 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments: COMPOSITE SAMPLE.

Note:

Cr analysis performed by analyst JA3 is TOTAL RECOVERABLE, and analysis performed by FKK isTotal Cr (01034).

CCS - 8/15/05 cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control Supervision_ Date: 15-Aug-OS Page 4 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664 - 6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPINTK Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-05 Customer ID: AL-O024619 Delivery Date : 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP - Intake Water Repermitting Composite Sample Laboratory ID,Number: AJ1S117 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Base/Neutral Compounds Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0025 0.0084 mg/I 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Butyl benzyl phthalate RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I 2-Chloronaphthalene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I 4-Chiorophenyl phenyl ether RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0042 Not Detected mg/I Chrysene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0044 Not Detected mg/I 3,3p-Dichlorobenzidine RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0165 Not Detected mg/I Diethyl phthalate RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Dimethyl phthalate RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0016 Not Detected mg/I Di-n-butylphthalate RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I 2,4-Dinitrotoluene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0057 Not Detected mg/I 2,6-Dinitrotoluene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Di-n-octylphthalate RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,2-Diphenylhydrazine RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Fluoranthene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0022 Not Detected mg/I Fluorene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Hexachlorobenzene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Hexachlorobutadiene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0009 Not Detected mg/I Hexachlorocyclopentadiene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Hexachloroethane RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0016 Not Detected mg/I lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0037 Not Detected mg/I Isophorone RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0022 Not Detected mg/I Naphthalene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0016 Not Detected mg/I Nitrobenzene RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.002 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments: COMPOSITE SAMPLE.

Note:

Cr analysis performed by analyst JA3 is TOTAL RECOVERABLE, and analysis performed by FKK isTotal Cr (01034).

CCS - 8/15/05 cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control Supervision_____________________________ Date: 15-Aug-OS Page 5 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664 -6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPINTK Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-05 Customer ID: AL-OO24619 Delivery Date : 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP - Intake Water Repermitting Composite Sample Laboratory ID Number: AJ15117 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Base/Neutral Compounds N-Nitrosodimethylamine RAH 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.003 Not Detected mg/I N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.002 Not Detected mg/I N-Nitrosodiphenylamine RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Phenanthrene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0054 Not Detected mg/I Pyrene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Acid Compounds 2-Chlorophenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0033 Not Detected mg/I 2,4-Dichlorophenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0027 Not betected mg/I 2,4-Dimethylphenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0027 Not Detected mg/I 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.024 Not Detected mg/I 2,4-Dinitrophenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.042 Not Detected mg/I 2-Nitrophenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0036 Not Detected mg/I 4-Nitrophenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0024 Not Detected mg/I P-Chloro-M-Cresol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0030 Not Detected mg/I Pentachlorophenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0036 Not Detected mg/I Phenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0015 Not Detected mg/I 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol RAN 6/29/2005 ~PA 625 0.0027 Not Detected mg/I Miscellaneous Method 625 - Extraction Date RAN 6/13/2005 06/13/05 Method 608 - Extraction Date RAN 6/13/2005 bATE 06/13/05 This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments: COMPOSITE SAMPLE.

Note:

Cr analysis performed by analyst JA3 is TOTAL RECOVERABLE, and analysis performed by FKK isTotal Cr (01034).

CCS - 8/15/05 cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control Supervision_____________________________ Date: 15-Aug-OS Page 6 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205)664-6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPINTK Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-OS Customer ID: AL-0024619 Delivery Date: 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP - Intake Water Trip Blanks Laboratory ID Number: AJ151 18 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Volatile Compounds Acrolein JCC 6/9/2005 EPA 603 0.002 Not Detected mg/I Acrylonitrile JCC 6/9/2005 EPA 603 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Benzene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Bromoform RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0030 Not Detected mg/I Carbon Tetrachloride RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Chlorobenzene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 , 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Chlorodibromomethane RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Chloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Chloroform RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Dichlorobromomethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1,1-Dichloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 1,2-Dichloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 1,1-Dichloroethylene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1,2-Dichloropropane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I trans-i ,3-Dichloropropylene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Ethylbenzene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Methyl Bromide RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Methyl Chloride RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Methylene Chloride RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Tetrachloroethylene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Toluene RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/i 1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1,1,1-Trichloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1,1,2-Trichloroethane RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Trichloroethylene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments:

cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control _________________________ Supervision_______________________________ Date: 09-Jul-OS Page 1 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664 - 6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPINTK Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-OS Customer ID: AL-0O24619 Delivery Date: 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP - Intake Water Trip Blanks Laboratory ID Number: AJ1S118 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Volatile Compounds Vinyl Chloride RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments:

cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control _________________________ Supervision_______________________________ Date: 09-Jul-OS Page 2 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205)664-6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPDISC Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 05-May-OS Customer ID: AL-00246i9 Delivery Date: 05-May-OS

Description:

FNP -Discharge Repermitting - Grab Sample Laboratory lDNumber: AJ12233 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units General Characteristics Flow KD 5/5/2005 Field Test 0.000 69.12 MGD Field pN RKB 5/5/2005 EPA 150.1 0.00 7.02 SU Temperature MAR 5/5/2005 Field Data 0. 23 Deg. C.

Chlorine, Total Residual RKB 5/5/2005 Field Test 0.01 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments:

cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control _______________________ Supervision_____________________________ Date: 18-May-05 Page 1 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 ALABAMA M Birmingham, Alabama 35291 POWER (205) 664-6081 ASOUTHERN COMPANY CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPDISC Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 05-May-OS Customer ID: AL-OO246i9 Delivery Date: 05-May-OS

Description:

FNP -Discharge Repermitting - Grab Sample Laboratory ID Number: AJ12231 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Metals, Cyanide, Total Phenols Cyanide, Total NRG 5/11/2005 EPA 335.2 0.005 Not Detected mg/I Phenol, Total NRC 5/19/2005 EPA 420.1 0.01 0.01 mg/I General Characteristics Coliform - Focal NRC 5/6/2005 SM 92220 1. Not petected colonies/100 Oil and Grease RDA 5/10/2005 EPA 1664 1.4 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as submitted.

Comments:

cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control _________________________ Supervision_______________________________ Date: 25-May-OS Page 1 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664 -6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPDISC Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date : 07-Jun-OS Customer ID: AL-OO246i9 Delivery Date: 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP -Discharge Repermitting Composite Sample Laboratory ID J~1umber: AJ1S119 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Volatile Compounds Acrolein Jcc 6/9/2005 EPA 603 0.002 Not Detected mg/I Acrylonitrile Jcc 6/9/2005 EPA 603 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Benzene RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Bromoform RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0030 Not Detected mg/I Carbon Tetrachloride RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Chlorobenzene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Chlorodibromomethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Chloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Chloroform RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 0.0022 mg/I Dichlorobromomethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,1-Dichloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,2-Dichloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 1,1 -Dichloroethylene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,2-Dichloropropane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropylene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I trans-i ,3-Dichloropropylene RAN 6/i 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Ethylbenzene RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Methyl Bromide RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Methyl Chloride RAN 6/i 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Methylene Chloride RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Tetrachloroethylene RAN 6/i 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Toluene RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,2-trans-Dichloroethylene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1,1 ,1-Trichloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1,1 ,2-Trichloroethane RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Trichloroethylene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments: COMPOSITE SAMPLE.

Note:

Cr analysis performed by analyst JA3 is TOTAL RECOVERABLE, and analysis performed by FKK isTotal Cr (01034).

CCS - 8/iS/OS cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control Supervision_____________________________ Date: 15-Aug-OS Page 1 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664 -6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPDISC Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-OS Customer ID: AL-OO24619 Delivery Date : 07-Jun-OS

==

Description:==

FNP -Discharge Repermitting Composite Sample Laboratory ID Number: AJ1S119 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Volatile Compounds Vinyl Chloride RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Pesticides Aldrin RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I alpha-BNc RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I beta-BNC RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I delta-BNC RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I gamma-BNC (Lindane) RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Chlordane RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not petected mg/I 4,4p-DDT RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I 4,4p-DDE RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I 4,4p-000 RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Dieldrin RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I alpha-Endosulfan RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I beta-Endosulfan RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Endosulfan sulfate RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Endrin RAN 6/23/2 005 EPA 608 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Endrin aldehyde RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Neptachlor RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Neptachlor epoxide RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I PcB, Aroclor 1242 RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I PCB, Aroclor 1254 RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I PcB, Aroclor 1221 RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I PCB, Aroclor 1232 RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I PcB, Aroclor 1248 RAN 6/23/2005 ~PA 608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I PCB, Aroclor 1260 RAN 6/23/2005 ~PA 608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I PCB, Aroclor 1016 RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.005 Not Detected mg/I Toxaphene RAN 6/23/2005 EPA 608 0.003 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments: COMPOSITE SAMPLE.

Note:

Cr analysis performed by analyst JA3 is TOTAL RECOVERABLE, and analysis performed by FKK isTotal Cr (01034).

CCS- 8/15/05 cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control Supervision_____________________________ Date: 15-Aug-OS Page 2 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205)664-6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPDISC Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-OS Customer ID: AL-O0246i9 Delivery Date: 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP -Discharge Repermitting Composite Sample Laboratory IDNumber: AJ1S119 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Metals, Cyanide, Total Phenols Aluminum, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.018 1.27 mg/I Antimony, Total JA3 6/i 7/2005 EPA 200.7 0.012 Not Detected mg/I Arsenic, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.005 Not Detected mg/I Barium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.002 0.030 mg/I Beryllium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Boron, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 , 0.003 0.060 mg/I Cadmium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.002 Not Detected mg/I Chromium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Chromium, Total FKK 8/12/2005 EPA 200.7 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Cobalt, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.004 Not Detected mg/I Copper, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.005 0.009 mg/I lron,Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA200.7 0.003 i.30 mg/I Lead, Total JA3 6/i 7/2005 EPA 200.7 0.004 Not Detected mg/I Magnesium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.026 1.90 mg/I Manganese, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.004 0.099 mg/I Mercury, Total RDA 6/9/2005 EPA 245.1 0.0002 Not Detected mg/I Molybdenum, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.01 Not Detected mg/I Nickel, Total JA3 6/1 7/2005 EPA 200.7 0.004 Not Detected mg/I Selenium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.005 Not Detected mg/I Silver, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.006 Not Detected mg/I Thallium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.007 Not Detected mg/I Tin, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.002 Not Detected mg/I Titanium, Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA 200.7 0.003 0.030 mg/I Zinc-Total JA3 6/17/2005 EPA200.7 0.004 0.011 mg/I General Characteristics Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day NRC 6/13/2005 SM 52108 2. Not Detected mg/I Chemical Oxygen Demand RDA 6/23/2005 EPA 410.4 1. 4 mg/I Total Organic Carbon KRC 6/10/2005 EPA 415.1 0.30 2.43 mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments: COMPOSITE SAMPLE.

Note:

Cr analysis performed by analyst JA3 is TOTAL RECOVERABLE, and analysis performed by FKK isTotal Cr (01034).

CCS - 8/15/05 cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control ________________________ Supervision_____________________________ Date: 15-Aug-05 Page 3 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664 - 608i CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPDISC Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-OS Customer ID: AL-O024619 Delivery Date : 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP -Discharge Repermitting Composite Sample Laboratory ID Number: AJiSii9 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units General Characteristics Solids - Suspended NRC 6/9/2005 EPA 160.2 1. 12. mg/I Nitrogen, Ammonia EMN 6/i0/2005 EPA 350.1 0.Oi 0.16 mg/I as N Bromide EMN 6/27/2005 EPA 300.0 0.02 Not Detected mg/I Color NRC 6/8/2005 EPA 110.3 0. 28. PCU Fluoride EMN 6/16/2005 EPA 340.2 0.02 0.12 mg/I Nitrogen, Nitrate/Nitrite EMN 6/8/2005 353.2/CALC 0.01 0.500 mg/I as N Nitrogen, Total Organic EMN 6/10/2005 EPA 351.3 0.01 0.330 mg/I as N Phosphorus, Total NRC 6/14/2005 EPA 365.2 0.01 0.13, mg/I as P Sulfate EMN 6/27/2005 EPA 300.0 1.0 7.96 mg/I Sulfide FKK 6/14/2005 EPA 376.2 0.01 0.13 mg/I Sulfite FKK 6/8/2005 EPA 377.1 0.25 Not Detected mg/I Surfactants (Foaming Agents) RDA 6/8/2005 EPA 425.1 0.01 0.01 mg/I Nitrogen, Nitrate EMN 6/8/2005 EPA 353.2 0.01 0.49 mg/I as N Nitrogen, Nitrite EMN 6/8/2005 EPA 353.2 0.01 0.01 mg/I as N Nitrogen, Total KjeIdahl EMN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 351.2 0.01 0.49 mg/I as N Base/Neutral Compounds Acenaphthene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.00i9 Not Detected mg/I Acenaphthylene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0035 Not Detected mg/I Anthracene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Benzidine RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.044 Not Detected mg/I Benzo(a)anthracene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0078 Not Detected mg/I Benzo(a)pyrene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I 3,4-Benzofluoranthene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0048 Not Detected mg/I Benzo(g,h,i)perylene RAN 6/29/2005 ~PA 625 0.0041 Not Detected mg/I Benzo(k)fluoranthene RAN 6/29/2005 ~PA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0053 Not Detected mg/I Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether RAN 6/29/2005 FPA 625 0.0057 Not Detected mg/I Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0057 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments: COMPOSITE SAMPLE.

Note:

Cr analysis performed by analyst JA3 is TOTAL RECOVERABLE, and analysis performed by FKK isTotal Cr (01034).

CCS - 8/iS/OS cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control _______________________ Supervision____________________________ Date: 15-Aug-OS Page 4 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 264i Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664 - 6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPDISC Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-OS Customer ID: AL-00246i9 Delivery Date: 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP -Discharge Repermitting Composite Sample Laboratory ID Number: AJ1S119 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Base/Neutral Compounds Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate RAN 6/29/200S EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Butyl benzyl phthalate RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I 2-Chloronaphthalene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0042 Not Detected mg/I Chrysene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.00i9 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 62S 0.0044 Not Detected mg/I 3,3p-Dichlorobenzidine RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0i65 Not Detected mg/I Diethyl phthalate RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Dimethyl phthalate RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0016 Not Detected mg/I Di-n-butylphthalate RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I 2,4-Dinitrotoluene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0057 Not Detected mg/I 2,6-Dinitrotoluene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.00i9 Not Detected mg/I Di-n-octylphthalate RAN 6/29/200S EPA 625 0.0025 Not Detected mg/I 1 ,2-Diphenylhydrazine RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.003 Not Detected mg/I Fluoranthene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0022 Not Detected mg/I Fluorene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Hexachlorobenzene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Nexachlorobutadiene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0009 Not Detected mg/I Hekachiorocyclopentadiene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Nexachloroethane RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.00i6 Not Detected mg/I Indeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0037 Not Detected mg/I Isophorone RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0022 Not Detected mg/I Naphthalene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0016 Not Detected mg/I Nitrobenzene RAN 6/29/200 5 EPA 625 0.002 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments: COMPOSITE SAMPLE.

Note:

Cr analysis performed by analyst JA3 is TOTAL RECOVERABLE, and analysis performed by FKK isTotal Cr (01034).

CCS 8/i S/OS cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control Sijnervisinn Date: 15-Aug-05 Page 5 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664 - 6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPDISC Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-05 Customer ID: AL-OO24619 Delivery Date: 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP -Discharge Repermitting Composite Sample Laboratory ID Number: AJ1S119 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Base/Neutral Compounds N-Nitrosodimethylamine RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.003 Not Detected mg/I N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.002 Not Detected mg/I N-Nitrosodiphenylamine RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Phenanthrene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0054 Not Detected mg/I Pyrene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I I ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0019 Not Detected mg/I Acid Compounds 2-Chlorophenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0033 Not Detected mg/I 2,4-Dichlorophenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0027 Not Detected mg/I 2,4-Dimethylphenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0027 Not Detected mg/I 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.024 Not Detected mg/I 2,4-Dinitrophenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.042 Not Detected mg/I 2-Nitrophenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0036 Not Detected mg/I 4-Nitrophenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 62S 0.0024 Not Detected mg/I P-Chloro-M-Cresol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0030 Not Detected mg/I Pentachlorophenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0036 Not Detected mg/I Phenol RAN 6/29/2005 EPA 625 0.0015 Not Detected mg/I 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol RAN 6/29/2005 ~PA 625 0.0027 Not Detected mg/I Miscellaneous Method 608 - Extraction Date RAN 6/13/2005 RATE 06/13/05 Method 625- Extraction Date RAN 6/i 3/2005 06/13/05 This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments: COMPOSITE SAMPLE.

Note:

Cr analysis performed by analyst JA3 is TOTAL RECOVERABLE, and analysis performed by FKK isTotal Cr (01034).

CCS 8/i 5/05 cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control ______________________ Supervision____________________________ Date: 15-Aug-OS Page 6 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 3529i (205) 664 - 6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPDISC Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-05 Customer ID: AL-O0246i9 Delivery Date : 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP -Discharge Trip Blanks Laboratory ID Number: AJ1512O Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Volatile Compounds Acrolein Jcc 6/9/2005 EPA 603 0.002 Not Detected mg/I Acrylonitrile Jcc 6/9/2005 EPA 603 0.001 Not Detected mg/I Benzene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Bromoform RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0030 Not Detected mg/I Carbon Tetrachloride RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Chlorobenzene RAN 6/i 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Chlorodibromomethane RAN 6/iS/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Chloroethane RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether RAN 6/1 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Chloroform RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Dichlorobromomethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.OOiO Not Detected mg/I 1, 1-Dichloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I I ,2-Dichloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 1,1 -Dichloroethylene RAN 6/i 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1 .2-Dichloropropane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I cis-i ,3-Dichloropropylene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I trans-i ,3-Dichloropropylene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I Ethylbenzene RAN 6/i 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Methyl Bromide RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Methyl Chloride RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Methylene Chloride RAN 6/i 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I 1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane RAN 6/i 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Tefrachloroethylene RAN 6/i5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Toluene RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I i ,2-trans-Dichloroethylene RAN 6/iS/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1,1 ,i-Trichloroethane RAN 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mg/I 1,1 ,2-Trichloroethane RAN 6/i 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I Trichloroethylene RAN 6/i 5/2005 EPA 624 0.0020 Not Detected mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments:

cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control ________________________ Supervision Date: 09-Jul-OS Page 1 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664 - 6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPDISC Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 07-Jun-05 Customer ID: AL-0024619 Delivery Date: 07-Jun-OS

Description:

FNP -Discharge Trip Blanks Laboratory ID Number: AJ15120 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units Volatile Compounds Vinyl Chloride RAH 6/15/2005 EPA 624 0.0010 Not Detected mgIl This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments:

cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control _________________________ Supervision_______________________________ Date: 09-Jul-OS Page 2 smk/NC

FIor~daRadloChemlstry Se~lces,Inc Sample Login Client: Alabama Power Co. Date I Time Work order #

General Test Lab Received 06/23/05 08:44 0506193 Client Contact~ Chris Stolz Client P.O. 6282 Project l.D.

Lab Sample l.D. Client Sample l.D. Sample Analysis Date/Time Requested 0506193-01 AJ15117 06/07/05 10:00 Ga, Gb, Ra226, Tra 0506193-02 AJ15119 06/07/05 10:42 Ga, Gb, Ra226, Tra Page 2 of 4

Florida Radiochemistry Services, Inc.

Analysis Report Lab Sample ID. 0506193-01 05061 93-02 Client 1.0. AJ15117 AJ15119 Gross Alpha <0.6 <0.8 Error +1- 0.4 0.5 MDL 0.6 0.8 EPA Method 900.0 900.0 Prep Date 07/05/05 07/05/05 Analysis Date 07/06/65 07/06/05 Analyst MJNI MJN Gross Beta 3.0 2.8 Error +1- 1.0 1.1 MDL 1.5 1.6 EPA Method 900.0 900.0 Prep Date 07/05/05 07/05105 Analysis Date 07/06/05 07/06/05 Analyst MJN MJN Radium 226 0.1 0.3 Error +1- 0.1 0.1 MDL 0.1 0.2 EPA Method 903.1 903.1 Prep Date 06/30/05 06/30/05 Analysis Date 07/08/05 07/08/05 Analyst MJN MJN Total Radium <0.9 <0.9 Error +/- 0.5 0.6 MDL 0.9 0.9 EPA Method 903.0 903.0 Prep Date 07/07/05 07/07/05 Analysis Date 07/08/05 07/08/05 Analyst MJN MJN Units pCi/I pCi/I Page 3 of 4

Florida Radiochemistry Services, Inc.

QA Page Analyte Sample # Date Sample Amount Spike Spike /Dup Spike Spike Dup Analyzed Result Spiked Result Result % Rec. % Rpd Gross Alpha 0506253-02 07/06/05 <0.9 10.2 8.4 9.8 82 15.4 Gross Beta 0506253-02 07/06/05 2.2 12.6 13.8 14.5 92 4.9 Radium 226 0506206-05 07/08/05 19.1 25.2 40.3 42.0 84 4.1 Total Radium 0506206-05 07/08/05 19.1 34.3 49.1 51.4 87 4.6 Quality Control Limits

%RPD %Rec.

Gross Alpha 18.1 68-116 Gross Beta 16.2 78-119 Radium 226 24.8 67-1 25 Total Radium 17.4 77-121 Page 4 of 4

Attachment 3 to U.S. EPA Form 351 O-2C Corrosion Inhibitors, Biocides, and Other Chemical Products In Use Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005 SOUT~jRN~f~

Corrosion Inhibitors, Biocides, and Chemical Treatments Used at Farley Nuclear Plant Service Water System Units I & 2 (Service Water Intake Structure)

Sodium Hy~ochlorite Added to maintain concentrations adequate to control Corbicula (Asiatic clams) in the service water system. Rate is controlled to assure that TRC values are in compliance with permit discharge limits at the Main Combined Facility Discharge (DSNOO1).

Ammonium Bisulfite Ammonium bisulfite is utilized as a dechlorination agent to dechlorinate residual chlorine present in Service Water due to cooling tower blowdown. Sufficient ammonium bisulfite is added to dechlorinate the amount of residual chlorine present in cooling tower blowdown, plus some excess to ensure dechlorination during any transients that may occur. Refer to EPA Form 35 10-2C Attachment 6 for additional information regarding the chlorination/dechlorination program.

Circulating Water System Units I & 2

~umHochlorite Added to maintain concentrations adequate to control biofouling in the circulating water system.

Farley is currently continuously adding sodium hypochlorite to maintain a constant residual of approximately 0.50 mg/I Free Available Chlorine (FAC) within the cooling towers. Cooling tower blowdown is continuously dechlorinated using ammonium bisulfite at the Service Water surge tank on each unit. Refer to EPA Fonri 3510-2C Attachment 6 for additional information regarding the chlorination/dechlorination program.

Depositrol BL5302 Depositrol BL5302 is a solution of BPS-i copolymer (sodium polyacrylate) and HEDP used for scale control and as a dispersant in the circulating water system. Depositrol BL5302 is added as needed for scale and solids control. When added, a target value of 2 ppm of product in the circulating water system is maintained.

~pg~trus CT1300 Spectrus CT1300 is an aqueous solution of proprietary quarternary ammonium compound that is added as needed for biofouling control in the cooling towers.

Foamtrol AF1441 Foamtrol AFI441 is a proprietary blend of surface active agents added as needed to control foam in the circulating water system.

Reactor Coolant System Lithiiirtl lydroxide Added at a rate to maintain approximately 0.20 4.36 ppm concentration in the reactor coolant system.

EPA Form 2C Attachment 3 Chemicals in Use Page 1 of 3

Boric Acid Added to achieve a maximum of approximately 2,500 ppm in the reactor coolant system.

Hydrogen Peroxide Treatment during unit shutdown uses approximately 40 quarts.

~ine Treatment during unit startup uses approximately 5 quarts.

Zinc Acetate Currently added to maintain approximately5 35 ppb zinc in the reactor coolant system.

Secondary System Chemical Control

~ine Added as needed to maintain approximately 110 150 ppb concentration in the secondary system.

During wet lay-up process, hydrazine concentration is maintained at 75 500 ppm in the steam generators.

Ethanolamine (ETA)

Added as needed to the secondary system ~omaintain a concentration of approximately 0.5 4.0 ppm.

Animonium Chloride Added as needed to the secondary system at a rate of approximately 0.05 -~ 0.30 mI/mm of a 10 40 ppm chloride solution.

Component Coolin2 Water System Potassium Chromate Added as needed to maintain approximately 175 1,000 ppm concentration with 400 ppm as the normal range for corrosion control.

Potassium Dichromate Added as needed in the system for pH control.

Potassium Hydroxide Added as needed in the system for pH control.

EPA Form 2C Attachment 3 - Chemicals in Use Page 2 of 3

Service Building / Turbine Building HVAC Systems Drewguard 4109 Corrosion Treatment (4% Sodium Nitrite Solution)

Added as needed in systems to maintain approximately 300 1,400 ppm concentration.

Diesel Generator Jacket Water System Drewguard 4109 Added as needed to maintain approximately 500 1,000 ppm concentration in the system.

BIOSPERSE 254 Previously approved for use by ADEM (July 29, 1992) in the system as an antimicrobial product for control of slime-forming/sulfate-reducing bacteria and algae. This product is not currently in use at FNP but may be utilized in the future.

Drew WPD 11-166 (Tolytriazole Buffered with Sodium Hydroxide)

Added as necessary for yellow metal corrosion control.

Sewage Treatment Plant Calcium / Sodium Hypochlorite Added in concentrations necessary to achieve sufficient residual to assure bacteriological control.

Sodium Hydroxide Added in concentrations necessary for the purpose of alkalinity control.

Drinking Water System Production & Construction Systems Sodium hypochlorite added to maintain approximately 0.5 2.0 ppm FAC residual in systems.

EPA Form 2C Attachment 3 Chemicals in Use Page 3 of 3

Attachment 4 to U~S.EPA Form 351 O-2C Descriptive Information and Data for Water Uses Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company Aucust 2005 SOuThERN~

Descriptive Information and Data for Water Uses Farley Nuclear Plant Introduction Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP), located on the west bank of the Chattahoochee River at approximatelyriver mile 44.3, consists of two generating units with a total nameplate rating of 1,776 megawatts. The plant provides approximately 15 to 20 percent of the power available to Alabama Power customers.

Service Water, which provides cooling and make-up water to both units, is withdrawn from a 95 acre Service Water Pond which is supplied from the Chattahoochee River. The FNP river water intake structure is located at the terminus of a 200 foot intake canal and delivers water from the Chattahoochee River to the Service Water Pond. During normal plant operation, the Service Water Pond stores water pumped from the river prior to use in the Service Water system. The Service Water system receives make-up from the Service Water intake structure located at the Service Water Pond. Service Water is pumped from the Service Water intake structure to the Plant to provide once-through cooling water to certain plant systems and make-up water to the water treatment plant and Circulating Water system. The Service Water Pond also provides the required cooling water storage capacity to accomplish and maintain simultaneous safe shutdown and cooldown conditions for both nuclear reactor units.

The discharges of Service Water from each unit are combined and carried to the plant discharge structure (DSNOO1) by a single 60 inch diameter pipe.

The FNP Circulating Water system consists of counterflow mechanical draft cooling towers which provide cooling for the main condensers. Make-up to the Circulating Water system is provided to replace water lost to cooling tower evaporation, drift, and blowdown. Blowdown is mixed with once-through Service Water and routed for discharge via DSNOO1.

The water treatment plant provides high purity water to the reactors and steam generators.

A 100,000 GPD sewage treatment plant provides treatment of sanitary wastes at FNP.

NOTE:

The following information provides detail on water use at FNP required for the NPDES Permit renewal application. The information is categorized by plant system. Current NPDES point source designations are indicated in parentheses.

EPA Form 2C Attachment 4 Description and Water Use Page 1 of 11

River Water System River Water Intake North and South FNP withdraws water from the Chattahoochee River for cooling and other plant uses via a 200 foot intake canal. The river water intake structure contains two (2) sections, each housing five (5) pumps with a total capacity ofapproximately 48,750 gpm. The river water pumps provide water to a storage pond for plant use. The pumps also provide water for river water screen backwash, pump cooling, and filter backwash.

River Water Intake Screen Backwash North and South (DSNO3O)

The screens are backwashed, as necessary, at different intervals during the day. Material removed from the screens during backwashing is disposed, as necessary, in a solid waste landfill. The screen backwash water is returned to the intake canal. The average flow combined for both units is 45,000 GPD and the maximum flow is 140,000 GPD.

River Water Pumps Mini-Flow South The mini-flow provides pump protection by allowing a minimum flow from the pump discharge header to the wet pit. The average flow is approximately 1,440,000 GPD and the maximum flow is approximately 2,160,000 GPD.

River Water Pumps Mini-Flow North The mini-flow provides pump protection by allowing a minimum flow from the pump discharge header to the wet pit. The average flow is approximately 1 ,~40,000GPD and the maximum flow is approximately 2,160,000 GPD.

River Water Building Sump Discharge South (D~N022)and North (DSNO23)

All cooling water and leakage flows are routed to t~iebuilding sump and are subsequently discharged to the Chattahoochee River. The average flow for DSNO22 is approximately 22,000 GPD. The average flow for DSNO23 is approximately 7,800 GPD. Flows are itemized below:

1. River Water Pumps Cooling Water The cooling water is supplied from the river water pumps discharge header and is discharged to the building sump.

2. River Water Pumps Air Compressor Cooling Water Air compressor cooling water is supplied from the river water pumps discharge header and is discharged through the building sump.

3. River Pumps Cooling Water-Filter Backwash Water The backwash water is supplied from the river water pumps discharge header and flushes debris from the filter. The water is discharged to the building sump.

Service Water System Service Water Intake Structure Units I & 2 The FNP Service Water system withdraws water from the Service Water Pond for plant cooling and other plant uses. The Service Water system primarily provides cooling water for various plant systems. It also EPA Form 2C Attachment 4 Description and Water Use Page 2 of 11

provides water to the water treatment plant for production of high quality water for use in the reactors and steam supply systems. The components of the Service Water system are itemized below:

Service Water Intake Screen Backwash Units I & 2 The intake screens are backwashed, as needed, at different intervals during the day. Material removed from the screens by backwashing is disposed in a solid waste landfill. The backwash water is routed back to the Service Water Pond.

Service Water Pumps Mini-Flow Units I & 2 The mini-flow provides pump protection by allowing a minimum flow from the pump discharge header to the wet-pit.

Service Water Structure Sump Discharge Units 1 & 2 All cooling waters and leakage flows are routed to the building sump and are subsequently discharged to the Southwest Yard Drainage (DSNO29). The components which discharge to the building sump are itemized below:

1. Service Water Pump Cooling Water Units 1 & 2 The cooling water is supplied from the Service Water pumps and is discharged to the building sump.

2. Service Water Pumps Air Compressor Cooling Water Units 1 & 2 Air compressor cooling water is supplied from the Service Water pumps discharge header and is discharged to the building sump.

Once-Through Cooling Water System This discharge is composed of the combined flows of service water used for plant equipment cooling. The components contributing to this discharge are itemized below:

1. Auxiliary Building and Containment Building Equipment Cooling Water Units 1 & 2 Various equipment cooling waters in the auxiliary building and the containment building exchange heat to service water which is ultimately discharged as once-through cooling water via DSNOO1.

2. Diesel Generator Building Equipment Cooling Water Units I & 2 This water provides cooling water for the emergency diesels and is discharged as once-through cooling water. The system is supplied by Service Water.

3. Turbine Building Equipment Cooling Water Units 1 & 2 The Service Water system provides cooling water for various equipment heat exchangers in the turbine building. The water is ultimately discharged as once-through cooling water.

4. Dilution By-Pass Units 1 & 2 By-pass lines in the Service Water system are provided to allow flow in excess of demand to be discharged in order to protect plant components from over-pressurization.

EPA Form 2C Attachment 4 Description and Water Use Page 3 of 11

Turbine Building System Turbine Building Sump Units 1 & 2 (DSNO15. DSNO161 This discharge consists of all drains, cooling waters, and leakage flows collected in the turbine building.

The components contributing to this discharge are itemized below:

1. Turbine Building Chemistry Lab Drains Units 1 & 2 Wastes from routine chemical analyses on the steam system are discharged to the Unit 2 turbine building sump.

2. Turbine Building Floor Drains Units 1 & 2 The floor drain system collects equipment and valve leakage and routes it to the turbine building sump.

3. Condenser Circulating Water Box Drain Units I & 2 This discharge is required periodically for maintenance of the condenser and for investigation of condenser tube leaks. This water is discharged to the turbine building sump.

4. Circulating Water Canal Drainage Vnits I & 2 During outages maintenance may reqLire drainage of the circulating water system. A portion of this drainage is routed to the turbine building sump.

5. Auxiliary Building Sumps Units 1 4 2 The auxiliary building sumps collect water from equipment draining and valve leakoff. The sumps normally discharge to the turbine building sump.

6. Draining of Steam Generators Units 1 & 2 During outages the steam generators may be drained through the turbine building sump.

Diesel Building System Diesel Building Sump Drains in the emergency diesel room are routed to a sump/oil-water separator outside the diesel building which is routed to the southeast yard drain (DSNO24). Diesel building air compressor cooling water (Service Water) continuously flows through this discharge path. The components of this system currently are:

1. Floor Drain System The floor drain system collects equipment and valve leakage and routes it to the diesel building sump.

2. Air compressor Cooling Water Service Water provided as air compressor cooling water is routed to the diesel building sump.

EPA Form 2C Attachment 4 Description and Water Use Page 4 of 11

Liquid Radwaste System Liquid Radwaste System Units 1 & 2 (DSNO19, DSNO2O)

Reactor and auxiliary system leakages and other auxiliary building wastes which are not recyclable are processed, as necessary, to ensure that all discharges are well below the limits established by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This discharge is also processed, as necessary, to remove chromates. Boron, which is used in the reactor and auxiliary systems, may be discharged in very low concentrations via this system. This system ultimately discharges to the Chattahoochee River via DSNOO1.

1. Refueling Water Storage Tank Retention Area Units 1 & 2 For radiological control, a retention area has been constructed around the refueling water storage tank which is designed to contain the volume of the entire tank in the event of a rupture. Water from equipment leakage is also routed to the liquid radwaste system via this area.

2. Reactor Make-Up Water Storage Tank Retention Area Units 1 & 2 For radiological control, a retention area has been constructed around the reactor make-up water storage tank which is designed to contain the volume of the entire tank in the event of rupture. Water from equipment leakage is routed to the liquid radwaste system.

3. Waste Solidification Building Sump Units 1 & 2 All drains, cooling waters, and equipment leakages in the waste solidification building are routed to the building sump. This sump is routed to the liquid radwaste system.

4. Low Level Radwaste Storage Building Sump Units I & 2 This sump is provided as a captive sump to contain any emergency release.

Steam Generator Blowdown Units I & 2 The steam generators must be blown down to minimize the concentration of contaminants in the system and to regulate treatment chemical concentrations.

Water Treatment Plant System Waste Settling Pond (DSNO14)

The effluent from the water treatment plant complex sump and runoff from the water treatment plant bulk chemical storage area is discharged via the waste settling pond. The pond discharge is ultimately routed to the Southeast Yard Drainage (DSNO24). Components contributing to this discharge include:

1. Water Treatment Plant Complex Sump This sump collects all water treatment wastes, regeneration wastes, backwashes, and cooling water. The discharge from this sump is routed to the waste settling pond, The components EPA Form 2C Attachment 4 Description and Water Use Page 5 of II

are identified as follows:

A. Clarifier Backwash The clarifier uses alum, coagulant, chlorine, and a pH adjuster to convert service water to a purity level acceptable for demineralization. Backwash of the clarifier is required periodically each day to remove accumulated material. This flow is routed to the water treatment plant complex sump.

B. Water Treatment Plant Carbon Filter Backwash Units I & 2 The backwash removes suspended solids which are retained on top ofthe carbon during the backwash operation. This discharge is routed to the water treatment plant complex sump.

C. Water Treatment Plant Sump Units 1 & 2 All demineralizer regeneration wastes are discharged to this sump. The effluent from this sump is discharged to the neutralization tank.

D. Neutralization Tank Units 1 & 2 This tank is used in conjunction with the water treatment plant sump to recirculate and neutralize regeneration wastes prior to discharge. Tank capacity is 20,000 gallons. The tank discharge is routed to the water treatment plant complex sump.

E. lonics Water Treatment System All backwash and treatment system rinse water is routed to the water treatment plant complex sump.

2. Acid and Caustic Tank Area Storm T~unoff This discharge consists of the runoff from the pad on which the acid and caustic bulk tanks are located. This discharge is routed ~othe waste settling pond.

Cooling Tower System Units I & 2 The cooling tower system is a recirculating system which includes the condensers and cooling towers.

Components of this discharge include:

I. Cooling Tower System Evaporation / Drift Units 1 & 2 Evaporation / drift is estimated to be approximately 1 .5% of the cooling tower system flow rate.

2. Cooling Tower Blowdown Units I & 2 (DSNOO5, DSNOO7)

Blowdown of the cooling tower system is required to maintain the proper chemical balance in the cooling tower system. At times, the blowdown may be isolated while chemical additions for control of biofouling and corrosion protection are being made. Average flow for DSNOOS and DSNOO7 is approximately 6.0 MGD during discharge. Currently, the cooling tower blowdown is normally continuously open.

3. Cooling Tower System Overflow Units 1 & 2 (DSNOO6, DSNOO8)

Periodically, due to imbalances or equipment malfunction in the cooling tower system, sonic of the system contents will overflow the basin and flow to the yard drains. When this occurs, action is initiated to correct the problem. Average annual flows for DSNOO6 and DSNOO8 are approximately 45,000 gallons per unit, based on four (4) hours per event and three (3) events EPA Form 2C Attachment 4 -~ Description and Water Use Page 6 of 11

per year.

Condenser Drain (Hot Well Flush) System Units I & 2 This discharge is used periodically to control the level of contaminants in the steam cycle, especially during plant start-ups and in chemical control during system transients.

Sewage Treatment Plant System (D5N009)

The sewage treatment plant has a capacity of 100,000 GPD with 96% BOD removal. A sand filter is in place to improve plant efficiency. The effluent from the sand filter can be discharged through three (3) separate paths:

East Yard Drainage System (normal flow path) (DSNO25)

Waste Settling Pond (alternate) (DSNO14)

Southeast Yard Drainage System (alternate) (DSNO24)

Miscellaneous Systems I. Chemical Metal Cleaning Wastes System (DSNOI2)

Wastewaters which result from chemical metal cleaning activities associated with plant systems will be treated and discharged in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 423. This generic point establishes monitoring requirements and effluent limits for the treatment process. The effluent from the treatment process may be discharged to various outfalls based on the location of the metal cleaning activities provided DSNO12 limits are met.

2. Ir~tedChromate Bearing Waste Water System (DSNO13)

This discharge point involves a portable ion-exchange wastewater treatment unit which is used to remove chromium from component cooling water containing potassium chromate as a corrosion inhibitor. This portable system may be moved to various parts of the plant for use and may be released via numerous sumps and drains which are routed to various discharge points. Monitoring to confirm compliance with chromium limits is conducted on each batch of wastewater treated. The average flow is approximately 500 gallons per batch.

3. lum S~tQrageArea (DSN03~)

Various diked petroleum storage areas are drained as necessary to remove accumulated rainwater.

Best management practices are used when draining diked areas, in accordance with the provisions of the existing NPDES permit.

Yard Drainage System

1. Southeast Yard Drainage (DSNO24)

This drainage receives storm runoff from buildings and yards in the southeast areas of the plant as well as equipment cooling water and other non-routine inputs. The average flow is approximately 34,900,000 gallons per event from a drainage area of approximately 204 acres. This drainage consists of the following:

EPA Forn~2C Attachment 4 Description and Water Use Page 7 of II

A. Southeast Yard Drain This drain system provides a discha~gepath for the roofand yard drains in the southeast parts of the plant. Other inputs to the system are described below:

a. Diesel Building Sump The discharge from the diesel building sump is routed to the southeast yard drain.

b. Low Voltage Switchyard Transformer Area Runoff All plant main power transfonners are surrounded by a concrete berm which will direct any transformer oil from a spill or rupture to an oil separator. Any rainwater which collects in the area passes through the oil separator prior to discharge to the yard drains. The separator is designed to retain the entire volume of the largest transfoniier in case of rupture.

c. Circulating Water Pumps Sump Discharge Unit I This discharge is primarily sanitary water. Cooling water supplied by the circulating water pump discharge header is used as a back-up supply.

d. Circulating Water Canal Drainage Unit 1 During outages maintenance may require drainage of the circulating water system. A portion of this drainage may be routed to the yard drainage system.

e. Service Building HVAC Sump Discharge This discharge is used to regulate the, amount of suspended solids and dissolved solids in the HVAC system below the allowable l~vels. Supply to this system is demineralized water or potable water.

f. Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Storage Tanks Unloading Pad Storm Runoff The unloading pad is designed to proyide containment for any diesel fuel spilled during unloading activities. Periodically, th~rainwater that collects on the pad must be drained.

This drainage is routed to the southea~tyard drain.

g. Turbine Building Oil Sump Unit 1 The turbine building oil sump collects small amounts of water in addition to the oil from various equipment. The water is discharged through a portable oil-water separator to the southeast yard drain.

B. Utility Building Area Runoff General runoff from this area is routed to the southeast yard drainage.

C. Auxiliary Boiler Diesel Fuel Oil Tank Retention Area Storm Runoff The auxiliary boiler diesel fuel oil tank is surrounded by a containment structure which is designed to retain the entire contents of the tank in case of rupture. Periodically, rainwater which collects inside the containment structure must be drained. This drainage is routed to the southeast yard drainage.

D. Waste Settling Pond Discharge from the waste settling pond is routed to the southeast yard drainage.

2. East Yard Drainage (DSNO25)

This drainage receives storm runoff from buildings and yards in the east plant areas as well as equipment cooling water and other non-routine inputs. The average flow is approximately 684,200 EPA Form 2C Attachment 4 Description and Water Use Page 8 of 11

gallons per event from a drainage area of approximately 4 acres.

The east yard drain is the collection point for all the various plant water inputs to the east yard drainage. The inputs are described below:

A. Tendon Access Gallery Sump Discharge Units I & 2 This discharge consists primarily of ground water which seeps into the annulus around the containment buildings.

B. Eire Pump Cooling.ater The supply for this cooling water is the fire pump discharge header. The discharge is routed to the east yard drain.

C. Central Alarm Station HVAC Cooling Water The sanitary water system provides the cooling water to the Central Alanii Station HVAC system.

The discharge is routed to the east yard drain.

D. Cooling Tower System Overflow Unit 1 (DSNOO6)

Periodically, due to imbalances or equipment malfunctions in the cooling tower system, some of the system contents will overflow the basins and will flow to the east yard drain. When this occurs, immediate action is initiated to correct the problem. The contents of the system are periodically pumped out for maintenance. This volume of water is discharged to the east yard drain.

E. Electrical Cable Tunnel Sump Discharge There is a concrete underground tunnel which connects the diesel generator building with the Unit 1 Auxiliary building. This tunnel provides a path for emergency power to be supplied to the plant.

The sump collects and discharges any ground water which may collect in the tunnel to the east yard drain.

F. Turbine Building Air Compressor Cooling Water Units I & 2 The service water system provides cooling water to the Turbine building air compressors. This discharge is routed to the east yard drain.

G. Circulating Water Canal Drainage Unit I During outages maintenance may require drainage of the circulating water system. A portion of this drainage may be routed to the yard drainage system.

3. Northcentral Yard Drainage (DSNO27)

The northcentral yard drainage collects stonTn runofffrom buildings and yards in the northcentral area of the plant as well as plant water inputs on a routine basis. The northcentral yard drain consists of three (3) pipes which merge into one common discharge prior to contact with Wilson Creek. The average flow is approximately 855,300 gallons per event from a drainage area of approximately five (5) acres. The components of this system are described below:

A. Ci~çulatingWater Pump Sump Discharge Unit 2 This discharge is primarily cooling water supplied by the circulating water pump discharge header.

Sanitary water is supplied as a backup.

B. ~

The turbine building oil sump collects small amounts of water in addition to the oil from various equipment. The water is discharged through a portable oil-water separator to the northcentral yard drain.

EPA Form 2C Attachment 4 Description and Water Use Page 9 of 11

C. Cooling Tower System Overflow Unit 2 (DSN008~

Periodically, due to imbalances or equipment malfunctions in the cooling tower system, some of the system contents will overflow the basins and will flow to the northcentral yard drain. When this occurs, immediate action is initiated to correct the problem. The contents ofthe system are periodically pumped out for maintenance. This volume of water is discharged to the northcentral yard drain.

D. Circulating Water Canal Drainage Unit 2 During outages maintenance may require drainage of the circulating water system. A portion of this drainage may be routed to the yard drainage system.

4. Northwest Yard Drainage (DSNO26)

The northwest yard drainage collects runoff from a small part of the northwest area of the plant and receives the discharge from the construction air compressor structure. The average flow is approximately 684,200 gallons per event from an approximate drainage area of four (4) acres. The discharges from the air compressor structure are described below:

A. Construction Air Compressor Cooling Water The potable water system provides secondary cooling for the compressed air system. The discharge is routed through an oil-water separator to the northwest yard drain.

B. Construction Air Compressor Structure Drains The floor drains from the air compressor structure are routed through an oil-water separator to the northwest yard drain.

C. High Voltage Switchyard Drainage This discharge consists of stormwater drainage from the west side of the high voltage switchyard to the northwest yard drain.

5. West Yard Drainage (DSNO28)

The west yard drain collects runoff from the west portion of the plant and the construction garage and routes it to Wilson Creek. The average flow is approximately 2,600,000 gallons per event from a drainage area of approximately fifteen (15) acres.

A. Construction Garage Wash Area Oil-Water Separator Discharge from the construction garage wash area is discharged to an oil-water separator. The effluent from the oil-water separator discharges to the west yard drain which ultimately discharges to Wilson Creek.

6. Southwest Yard Drainage (DSNO29)

The southwest yard drainage system provides a discharge path for drainage from the southwest area of the plant, the main parking lot, and the Fire Training Center. The average flow is approximately 500,000 gallons per event from an approximate area of two (2) acres.

A. fj~çTrainingArea Fuel Oil Storage Area Oil-Water Separator The oil-water separator removes any oil which may be combined with rainwater inside the oil storage area berm prior to discharge. The discharge from this oil-water separator is routed to the southwest yard drainage.

B. Fire Training Area Stormwater Runoff The majority of the stormwater runoff from this area is routed to a oil-water separator before discharging to the southwest yard drainage.

EPA Form 2C Attachment 4Description and Water Use Page 10 of 11

C. Main Parking Lot Runoff Stoniiwater runoff from the main parking lot is routed to the southwest yard drainage.

D. Service Water Structure Sump Discharge Units I & 2 All cooling waters and leakage flows are routed to the building sump and are subsequently discharged to the southwest yard drainage.

7. Water Tank Drainage System There are several tank systems that store water for various plant uses. On occasion, these tanks require drainage for testing or maintenance operations. The tanks in this system are described below:

A. ciprified / Well Water Storage Tank Drainage Drainage from this tank would be routed to the southeast yard drain.

B. Denijeeralizer Water Storggc Tanlç Drainage Drainage from these tanks would be routed to the southeast yard drain.

C. Condensate Storage Tank Drainage Units 1 & 2 Drainage from these tanks would be routed to the east yard drain.

D. Sanitary Water Tank Drainage (Production & Construction)

Drainage from these tanks would be routed to the east yard drain (Production) and the northwest yard drain (Construction).

E. ~j~~gYrotectionTank Drainage Drainage from these tanks would be routed to the east yard drain.

8. Well Water System On-site wells provide groundwater for the sanitary water system, for the fire protection system, and as back-up to the demineralizers. Occasionally, if a well has not been used for a period of time, it must be flushed to produce water of acceptable quality for plant use.

9. Miscellaneous Valve Boxes and Electrical Cable Pullboxes Units I & 2 Miscellaneous valve boxes and electrical cable pullboxes which collect and discharge any rainwater or valve leakoff to the yard drain system are located in various areas of the plant.

EPA Form 2C Attachment 4 Description and Water Use Page 11 of 11

Attachment 5 to U~S.EPA Form 351 O-2C Proposed Permit Revisions Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005 SOUTHERNZ~

Description of Proposed Permit Revisions Farley Nuclear Plant Part 1(A): Outfall 001 It is requested that the monitoring frequency for chromium on Outfall 001 (Main Combined Facility Discharge) be changed to once per quarter. Past data (Figure 1) indicates that chromium values for this discharge is consistently meeting permit limitations and more frequent monitoring is not warranted.

Figure 1. Main Combined Facility Discharge (OSNOOI) Chromium 0.600 0.500 Daily Max and Monthly Average Limits = 0.5 mg/I 0400 ~- --~.

S 0300 -~- --. ------- --

E 0

0.200 ------------ ---------.-.-----~-------- --I 0.100 .--

Detection Limit = 0.001 mg/I 0.000~* $ ~$ $ $S$~ $$$* ~ S t$tS *~*5 *S*~** S* $5 t*

1/1/02 7/20/02 2/5/03 8/24/03 3/11/04 9/27/04 4/15/05 Date EPA Form 2C Attachment 5 ~- Proposed Permit Revisions Page 1 of 5

Part 1(A): Outfall 014 It is requested that the monitoring frequency for flow on Outfall 014 (Waste Settling Pond) be changed to once per month. All other parameters for this outfall have once per month sampling frequencies, so this would serve to standardize the sampling requirements for this outfall. Additionally, past data (Figure 2) demonstrates that the discharge flow generally remains less than 1.0 MGD.

Figure 2. Waste Settling Pond (DSN 014) Discharge Flow 1.2 1.0 0.8 a

0.6 S

0 U.

0.4 0.2 0.0 1/1/02 7/20/02 2/5/03 8~24/03 3/11/04 9/27/04 4/15/05 Date EPA Form 2C Attachment 5 Proposed Permit Revisions Page 2 of 5

Part 1(A): Outfalls 022 and 023 It is requested that the monitoring frequency for all parameters for Outfalls 022 and 023 (River Water Building Sump South and North, respectively) be changed to once per six months. Past data (Figures 3, 4, and 5) indicates that these discharges are consistently meeting permit and/or regulatory limitations and more frequent monitoring is not warranted.

Figure 3. River Water Building Sumps Flows 0.25 0.20 -~_ _

0.15 .----------------------- --- ~ -.

a :

.2 . . . .

U. .. . .

0.10 . -----------~ -------------.. - --.~--

0.00 1/1/02 7/20/02 2/5/03 8/24/03 3/11/04 9/27/04 4/15/05 Date South Sump. DSNO22 North Sump, DSN023 I EPA Form 2C Attachment 5 Proposed Permit Revisions Page 3 of 5

Figure 4. River Water Building Sumps pH 9.0 8.5 8.0 t2. ~5 I

7.0 6.5 6.0 1/1/02 7/20/02 2/5/03 8/24/03 3/11/04 9/27/04 4/15/05 Date

~South Su~, DSN022 North Sump, DSNO23 Figure 5. River Water Building Sumps -Oil & Grease 25.0 20.0 Daily Maximum Limit = 20.0 mg/I 15.0 Oi Monthly Average LimitiSO mg/I S

a 0

10.0 5.0

~...,.,,....,...,...,

Detection Limit = 1 4 mg/I 0.0 1/1/02 7/20/02 2/5/03 8/24/03 3/11/04 9/27/04 4/15/05 Date South Sump, DSNO22 North Sump, DSNO23 EPA Form 2C Attachment 5 Proposed Permit Revisions Page 4 of 5

Part 1(A): Outfalls 001, 005, 006, 007, 008 Refer to EPA Form 351 0-2C Attachment 6 for a complete description of the cooling tower dechlorination arrangement and proposed monitoring program.

EPA Form 2C Attachment 5 Proposed Permit Revisions Page 5 of 5

Attachment 6 to U~S.EPA Form 351 O-2C Description of Dechlorination Program Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005 SOUT~~f~

Description of Dechlorination Program Farley Nuclear Plant Since the NPDES permit renewal in 2000, Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP) has altered the manner in which the circulating water chemical treatment system is operated in order to support the addition of dechlorination equipment. Two meetings were held with ADEM personnel regarding the change before it was implemented on a trial basis in February 2005, and ADEM concurred that institution of this program would be beneficial in dechlorinating cooling tower discharges.

Previously, the cooling tower chlorination practice at FNP was composed of the following steps:

1. close cooling tower blowdown,

2. Add sodium hypochlorite (bleach) to achieve residual chlorine in the system,

3. Maintain chlorine residual for several hours with blowdown closed,

4. Stop sodium hypochlorite addition,

5. Wait for chlorine to dissipate naturally or add ammonium bisulfite to dechlorinate system,

6. Verif~non-detectable levels of chlorine (TRC and FAC),

7. Open cooling tower blowdown.

This practice was not an efficient treatment strategy, and did not adequately protect cooling tower components from biofouling. Biofouling degrades system performance, and can even result in physical failure of cooling tower structural components if not properly controlled.

The current chlorination/dechlorination strategy is as follows (refer to Figure 1):

The circulating water system is continuously treated with sodium hypochlorite to maintain a system chlorine residual of approximately 0.50 mg/I Free Available Chlorine (FAC).

Cooling tower blowdown noniially remains open with a continuous discharge.

A dechlorinationchemical (normally ammonium bisulfite, but sodium bisulfite may also be utilized) is injected at the Service Water Surge Tank, which is a point downstream of where cooling tower blowdown commingles with Service Water flow. There is not an available dechlorination point prior to mixing due to system configuration.

The ammonium bisultite feedrate is based on actual chlorine levels in the circulating water system, plus some excess feed to act as a buffer against any fluctuations in chlorine levels. This ensures that the mass of chlorine discharged from the circulating water system is effectively dechlorinated prior to final discharge.

The only available downstream monitoring point is the Main Combined Facility Discharge (DSNOO1). Compliance with the water quality based TRC limit of 0.20 mg/I at this outfall has been maintained. The residual chlorine present at this outfall is due to chemical treatment of the once-through Service Water system.

Southern Nuclear Operating Company proposes the following pennit changes to reflect the current Circulating Water chlorination/dechlorination program:

Outfalls DSNOO5 and DSNOO7:

Add a footnote indicating that the TRC, FAC, and Time of TRC limitations do not apply when the dechlorination system is in service, Ifdechlorination is out of service then the existing limitations would apply. Upon request of the Director, sampling and mass-balance calculations can be performed to demonstrate that the mass of chlorine discharged via cooling tower blowdown is neutralized by the dechlorination system prior to final discharge.

Outfall DSNOO 1:

Change footnote 3 to the following (changes in italics): When chlorination is occurring for purposes of corbicula or microbiofouling control, in accordance with BMP Plan, grab samples shall be taken to verif~compliance with total residual chlorine limitations. Samples shall also be taken when the EPA Form 2C Attachment 6 Dechlorination Program Page 1 of 2

Circulating Water system is chlorinatedand dechlorination is in service. Sampling is required only during these periods. Ifbromine or a combination of bromine and chlorine is utilized for control of biofouling, monitoring requirements for TRC and FAC shall be applicable to TRO (Total Residual Oxidants) and FAO (Free Available Oxidants). There is no difference in test methods between TRC/FAC and TRO/FAO.

EPA Form 2C Attachment 6Dechlorination Program Page 2 of 2

Figure 1. Dechlorination Simplified Flow Diagram Service Water Pond River Water Intake (

Ammonium Bisulfite Addition (Dechlorination)

C~~3 w

Unit I Unit 1 i:t~

0 F- Once-Through urge Cooling Tank 3)

-c 0

0 Unit 1 0 Jnit 1 CT Blowdown (DSNOO5) -c Discharge

-c 0

Unit 2 Discharge Uniti Cooling Main Combined Unit 1 Towers Facility Discharge Circulating Water (DSNOO1)

System Sodium Hypochlorite Addition - - -

for Circulating Water Treatment

U.S. EPA Form 3510-2F Application for Permit to Discharge Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 200~ SOJTE~

EPA ID Number (copy from item I of Form 1) Form Approved 0MB No. 2040-0086 Please print or type in the unshaded areas AL0024619 Approval expires 5-31-92 United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Washington, DC 20460 2F ~ ~JJ/I1~ Application for Permit to Discharge Storm Water NPDES Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity Paperwork Reduction Act Notice Public reporting burden for this application is estimated to average 286 hours0.00331 days 0.0794 hours 4.728836e-4 weeks 1.08823e-4 months per appltution, induding time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sourcas, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate, any other aspect of this collection of information or suggestions for improving this form, induding suggestions which may increase or reduce this burden to: Chief, Information Policy Branch, PM-223, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St, SW, Washington, DC 20460,or Director, Office ofInformation and Regulatory Affairs, Otilce of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503.

I. Outfall Location For each outfall, list t- - ~

~c...-~

~ ~ ~ -. of its- location to the np.arest 15 ~~ and the name of the receivina water A. Outfall Number . , D. Receiving Water LatItude C. Longitude (name)

(list) ,

SEE ATTA CHED II. Improvements A. Are you now required by any Federal, State, or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operation of wastewater treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This includes, but is not limited to, permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant or loan conditions.

4. Final

1. Identification of Conditions, Affected Outfalls Compliance Date Aareements, Etc. number source of discharge 3. Brief Description of Project a. req. b. proi.

N/A B. You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution (or other environmental projects which may affect your discharges) you now have under way or which you plan. Indicate whether each program is now under way or planned, and idicate your actual or planned schedules for construction.

Ill. Site Drainage Map Attach a site map showing topography (or indicating the outline of drainage areas served by the outfall(s) covered in the application if a topographic map Is unavailable) depicting the facility including: each of its intake and discharge structures; the drainage area of each storm water outfall; paved areas and buildings within the drainage area of each storm water outfall, each known past or present areas used for outdoor storage or disposal of significant materials, each existing structure control measure to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff, materials loading and access areas, areas where pesticides, herbicides, soil conditioners and fertilizers are applied; each of its hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal units (including each are not required to have a RCRA permit which is used for accumulating hazardous waste under 40 CFR 262.34); each well where fluids from the facility are injected underground; springs, and other surface water bodies which receive storm water discharges from the facility EPA Form 3510-2F (Rev. 1-92) Page 1 of 3 Continued on Page 2

Continued from the Front A. For each outfall, provide an estimate of the area (include units) of impervious surfaces (including paved areas and building roofs) drained to the outfall, and an estimate of the total surface area drained by the outfall.

Outfall - Area of Impervious Surface Total Area Drained - Outfall Area of Impervious Surface Total Area Drained Number (provide units) (provide units) Number (provide units) (provide units)

SEEATTACHED .

B. Provide a narrative description of significant materials that are currently or in the past three years have been treated, stored or disposed in a manner to allow exposure to storm water; method of treatment, storage, or disposal; past and present materials management practices employed to minimize contact by these materials with storm water runoff; materials loading and access areas; and the location, manner, and frequency in which pesticides, herbicides, soil conditioners, and fertilizers are applied.

SEEATTA CHED C. For each outfall, provide the location and a description of existing structural and nonstructural control measures to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff; and a description of the treatment the storm water receives, including the schedule and type of maintenance for control and treatment measures and the ultimate disposal of any,solid or fluid wastes other than by discharge.

Outfall List Codes from Number Treatment Table 2F-1 N/A V. Non Stormwater Discharges A. I certify under penalty of law that the outfall(s) covered by this application have been tested or evaluated for the presence of nonstormwater discharges, and that all nonstormwater discharge~from these outfall(s) are identified in either an accompanying Form 2C or Form 2E application for the outfall.

Name of Official Title (type or print) - Signature Date Signed L. M. Stinson, Vice President, Farley Project . ..,, ,~/ .. ,

~/z~/~

n. orovide a description of the method used, the date of any testing, and the onsite drainage points that were directly obs~rvedduring a test.

SEEA TTA CHED VI. Significant Leaks or Spills Provide existing information regarding the history of significant leaks or spills of toxic or hazardous pollutants at the facility in the last three years. includinO the approximate date and location of the spill or leak, and the type and amount of material released.

THEREHAVEBEEN NO SIGNIFICANT LEAKS OR SPILLS OF TOXIC OR HAZARDOUSMATERIALSAT FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT IN THELAST THREE(3) YEARS.

EPA Form 3510-2F (Rev, 1-92) Page 2 of 3 Continued on Page 3

EPA ID Number (copy from Item I of Form 1)

Continued from Page 2 AL0024619 VII. Discharge Information A,B,C, & D: See instruction before proceeding. Complete one set of tables for each outfall. Annotate the outfall number in the space provided.

Tables ViA, VII-B, and VII-C are included on separate sheets numbered VII-1 and VII-2.

E. Potential discharges not covered by analysis - is any toxic pollutant listed in table 2F-2, 2F-3, or 2F-4, a substance or a component of a substance which you currently use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or byproduct?

Eli Yes (list at/such pollutants below) No (go to Section IX)

N/A VIII. Biological Toxicity Testing Data ______

Do you have any knowledge or reason to believe that any biological test for acute or chronic toxicity has been made on any of your discharges or on a receiving water in relation to your discharge within the last 3 years?

Yes (list all such pollutants below) LI No (go to Section IX)

ANNUAL BIOMONITORING AS REQUIRED BY EXISTING NPDES PERMIT ON THEMAIN COMBINED FACILITY DISCHARGE(DSNOOI).

IX. Contact analysis Information Were any of the analysis reported in item VII performed by a contact laboratory or consulting firm?

Yes (list the name, address, and telephone number of, and pollutants LII No (go to Section X) analyzed by, each such laboratory or firm be/ow) -,

A. Name B. Address C. Area Code & Phone No. D. Pollutants Analyzed Alabama Power Company Building No, 8 (205) 664-6194 All except pHand General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 temperature Birmingham, AL 35291 X. Certification

/ certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.

A. Name & Official Title (type or print) B. Area Code and Phone No.

L. M. Stinson, Vice President, Farley Project (205) 992-5000 C. Signature ,,~ ~ D. Date Signed

~-~v/ _~j~./ ~ .

/ ,/~ ,-

EPA Form 3510-2F (Rev. 1-92) Page 3 of 3

EPA ID Number (copy from Item / of Form 1) Form Approved. 0MB No. 2040-0086 Approval expires 5-31-92 AL0024619 VII. Discharge Information (Continued from page 3 of Form 2F)

Part A. You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional details.

Maximum Values Average Values Number Pollutant units) ,J(~,gjyde units) Of And Grab Sample Grab Sample Storm CAS Number Taken During Flow-weighted Taken During Flow-weighted Events (if available) First 30 Composite First 30 Composite Sampled Minutes Minutes Sources of Pollutants Oil & Grease Not Detected N/A .-. --- I Biological Oxygen 14 mg/I 16 mg/I --- --- 1 Demand (60D5)

Chemical Oxygen 37mg/I 36 mg/I --- --- I Demand (COD) -

Total Suspended 98 mg/I 138 mg/I --~ .-- 1 Solids (TSS)

Total Organic 2.12 mg/I 2.34 mg/I --- --- 1 Nitrogen Total 0.48 mg/I 0.35 mg/I --- - I Phosphorus pH Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum I 6.59 6.59 6.59 6.59 Part B - List each pollutant that is limited in an effluent guideline which the facility is subject to or any pollutant listed in the facilitys NPDES permit for its process wastewater (if the facility is operating under an existing NPDES permit). Complete one table for each outfall.

See the instructions for additional details and requirements.

Maximum Values Average Values Number Pollutant ,~()f~pjyde units) ,(include units) Of And Grab Sample Grab Sa~nple Storm CAS Number Taken During Flow-weighted Taken During Flow-weighted Events (if available) First 30 Composite First ~0 Composite Sampled Minutes Minutes Sources of Pollutants N/A EPA Form 3510-2F (Rev. 1-92) Page Vu-i Continue on Reverse

Continued from the Front Part C - List each pollutant shown in Tables 2F-2, 2F-3, and 2F-4 that you know or have reason to believe is present. See the instructions for additional details and reauirements. Comolote one table for each outfall. _________ _____________________________

-- Maximum Values Average Values Number -

Pollutant (include units) (include units) Of And Grab Sample Grab Sample Storm CAS Number Taken During Flow-weighted Taken During Flow-weighted Events (ifavailable) First 30 Composite First 30 Composite Sampled Minutes Minutes Sources of Pollutants Chlorine, Total Not N/A Not N/A I Residual Detected Detected Part ID - Provide data for the storm event(s) which resulted in the maximu m values for the flow weighted composite sample.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5, Number of hours between Date of Duration Total rainfall beginning of storm meas- Total flow from Storm of Storm Event during storm event ured and end of previous rain event Event (in minutes) (in inches) measurable rain event (gallons or specify units) 5/19/05 96 minutes 0.51 inches > 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months 8,231 gallons

7. Provide a description of the method of flow measurement or estimate.

SEEA TTA CHED EPA Form 3510-2F (Rev. 1-92) Page VI1-2

- Attachment I to U.S. EPA Form 351 O-2F Section I. Outfall Locations Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005 5OUThERNZ~

Form 2F,Section I Outfall Locations Farley Nuclear Plant The following outfalls located on the FNP site convey stormwater runoff from areas associated with industrial activity to the Chattahoochee River. None of the areas discharge directly to the river but discharge directly or indirectly to small tributaries, including Wilson Creek, which ultimately discharge to the Chattahoochee River. The stormwater drainages and their corresponding Discharge Serial Number (DSN) are provided below. DSNO24, DSNO25, and DSNO29 discharge indirectly to the Chattahoochee River (31° 12 52 Latitude, 85° 05 55 Longitude) via unnamed tributaries on the site. DSNO26, DSNO27,and DSNO28 discharge to Wilson Creek (310 13 45 Latitude, 85° 06 45 Longitude).

Description DischargeSerial Number (DSN)

Southeast Yard Drainage DSNO24 East Yard Drainage DSNO25 Northwest Yard Drainage DSNO26 Northcentral Yard Drainage DSNO27 West Yard Drainage DSNO28 Southwest Yard Drainage DSNO29 EPA Form 2F Attachment I Outfall Locations Page 1 of I

Attachment 2 to U.S. EPA Form 351 O-2F Section III. Site Drainage Map Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005 SOUT~

F.rlty Nud.ar PI~nt NPDES Prrmit AL0024619

~ic~TE[~j~)12 ;3nc E~NC~1~ ~ p~rr~-~ .a:. D~3:fl1f~

~ L~fl. dc~nc~:~3~::.

~

ur1~i~c*:3t ~

Attachment 3 to U.S. EPA Form 351 O-2F Section IVA. Description of Stormwater Outfalls Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005 SOUT~R~f~

Form 2F,Section IV(A) Stormwater Outfall Description Farley Nuclear Plant The following outfalls are utilized to convey stormwater associated with industrial activity at FNP from the referenced drainage areas to the Chattahoochee River. The drainage areas are briefly described in the following table.

Outfall Description DSNO24 Southeast Yard Drainage The Southeast Yard Drainage receives stormwater runoff from buildings and yards in the southeast areas of the plant. The average flow is approximately 34,900,000 gallons per event from a drainage area of approximately 204 acres.

DSNO25 East Yard Drainage This drainage receives stormwater runoff from buildings and yards in the east plant areas. The average flow is approximately 684,200 gallons per event from a drainage area of approximately 4 acres.

DSNO26 Northwest Yard Drainage This drainage receives runoff from the northwest area of the plant. The average flow is approximately 684,200 gallons per event from an approximate drainage area of 4 acres.

DSNO27 Northcentral Yard Drainage This drainage receives stormwater runoff from buildings and yards in the northcentral area of the plant. The flow is approximately 855,300 gallons per event from a drainage area of approximately 5 acres.

DSNO28 West Yard Drainage This drainage receives stormwater runoff from primarily yard areas in the west portion of the site.

The average flow is approximately 2,600,000 gallons per event from a drainage area of approximately 1 5 acres.

DSNO29 Southwest Yard Drainage This drainage receives stormwater from the southwest portion of the plant including the main parking lot and Fire Training Center. The average flow is approximately 500,000 gallons per event from a drainage area of approximately 2 acres.

EPA Form 2F Attachment 3 Stormwater Outfall Description Page 1 of 1

Attachment 4 to U.S. EPA Form 351 O-2F Section IVB. Materials Management Practices Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005 SOUT4~

Form 2F,Section IV(B) Materials Management Practices Farley Nuclear Plant There have been no significant quantities of hazardous materials at FNP over the past three (3) years which have been treated, stored, or disposed in a manner which would result in exposure to stormwater and / or contamination of stormwater runoff. The following FNP procedures address management of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes and provide guidance relative to prevention of contamination resulting from contact with stormwater.

FNP-0-AP-60 Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan, Hazardous Waste Contingency Plan FNP-0-CCP-900 Hazardous Waste Holding Area Requirements FNP-0-CCP-901 Shipping of Hazardous Wastes FNP-0-CCP-904 Receipt and Identification of Industrial Wastes FNP-0-CCP-905 Chemistry Support to FNP-0-SHP-26 FNP-0-SHP-26 Chemical Product Control and Hazard Communication Program FNP-0-SHP-30 Waste Disposal FNP-0-ENV-25 Operation of the Farley Nuclear Plant Landfill FNP-0-TCP-23 Hazardous Waste Training Plan In addition to the above procedures, proactive materials management practices are employed to minimize contact ofhazardous materials with stormwater including indoor storage, structural control measures, secondary containment for tanks and container storage, and materials management training. A formal Hazard Communication Program (FNP-0-SHP-26) has also been implemented.

EPA Form 2F Attachment 4 Materials Management Practices Page 1 of I

Attachment 5 to U.S. EPA Form 351 O-2F Section IVC. Structural Control Measures Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operatine Company August 2005 SeUT~4J~f~

Form 2F,Section IV(C) Description of Structural Controls Farley Nuclear Plant Structural control methods utilized at FNP to control contact of stormwater with pollutants include:

Containments Concrete containments are utilized around tanks and drum storage areas contain hazardous materials. Drainage from containment areas is strictly controlled by procedure to ensure accumulated rainwater is not contaminated with the stored material prior to release.

Site Drainage System A system of pipes, concrete culverts, and spillways is utilized to collect and channel stormwater flow in areas where high flows pose significant potential for erosion.

Use of Grass Swales, Vegetation / Reve~etationof Eroded Areas Natural grass swales are utilized when appropriate for drainage of sheet flow runoff from large areas of the site. This promotes infiltration and minimizes erosion by slowing runoff velocity.

Eroded or newly disturbed areas are promptly vegetated to prevent soil contamination of runoff alternatively, rip-rap may be used to slow runoff velocity and minimize erosion.

EPA Form 2F Attachment 5 Structural Controls Page 1 of I

Attachment 6 to U.S. EPA Form 351 O-2F Section VB. Description of Sample Point Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005 SOUT~

Form 2F,Section V(B) Description of Sample Location Farley Nuclear Plant The stormwater sample was obtained from a drain near the bulk hydrogen storage area during a 0.51 inch rainfall event which occurred on May 19, 2005. This point is located in the power block and is representative of the quality of stormwater runoff associated with industrial activity at Farley Nuclear Plant.

Both manual grab and composite samples were collected in accordance with EPA methodology during the rainfall event. Field data and analytical data are presented in a separate attachment, The storniwater drainage system at Farley Nuclear Plant is evaluated for non-stormwater discharges by:

1. Review of drainage drawings,

2. Plant walkdowns, and

3. Interviews of maintenance, engineering, and operations personnel.

EPA Form 2F Attachment 6 Sample Location Description Page I of I

Attachment 7 to U.S. EPA Form 351 O-2F Section VIIA & B. Chemical Analysis Reports Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205)664-6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPGRAB Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 19-May-05 Customer ID: AL-0024619 Delivery Date: 20-May-05

Description:

FNP - Stormwater Grab Repermitting Laboratory lDNumber: AJ13562 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units General Characteristics Field pH DJM 5/19/2005 EPA 150.1 0.00 6.59 SU Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day HRG 5/25/2005 SM 5210B 2. 14. mg/I Chemical Oxygen Demand RDA 5/24/2005 EPA 410.4 1. 37 mg/I Solids - Suspended HRG 5/23/2005 EPA 160.2 1. 98. mg/I Nitrogen, Nitrate/Nitrite EMH 5/20/2005 353.2/CALC 0.01 0.580 mg/I as N Oil and Grease RDA 5/25/2005 EPA 1664 , 1.4 Not Detected mg/I Phosphorus, Total HRG 5/31/2005 EPA 365.2 0.01 0.48 mg/I as P Nitrogen, Nitrate EMH 5/20/2005 EPA 353.2 0.01 0.57 mg/I as N Nitrogen, Nitrite EMH 5/20/2005 EPA 353.2 0.01 0.01 mg/I as N Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl EMH 6/2/2005 EPA 351.2 0.01 1.54 mg/I as N Nitrogen, Total EMH 6/2/2005 SM4500 0.01 2.12 mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments:

cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control ________________________ Supervision_____________________________ Date: 10-Jun-05 Page 1 smk/NC

General Test Laboratory P.O. Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 (205) 664 - 6081 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS To: Mr. Ken Darby (and email) Customer Account: NFNPCOMP Farley Nuclear Plant Sample Date: 19-May-05 Customer ID: AL-0024619 Delivery Date: 20-May-05

Description:

FNP - Stormwater Composite Repermitting Laboratory ID Number: AJ13563 Name Analyst Test Date Reference Vio Spec MDL Results Units General Characteristics Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 Day HRG 5/25/2005 SM 5210B 2. 16. mg/I Chemical Oxygen Demand RDA 5/24/2005 EPA 410.4 1. 36 mg/I Solids - Suspended HRG 5/23/2005 EPA 160.2 1. 138. mg/I Nitrogen, Nitrate/Nitrite EMH 5/20/2005 353.2/CALC 0.01 0.620 mg/I as N Phosphorus, Total HRG 5/31/2005 EPA 365.2 0.01 0.35 mg/I as P Nitrogen, Nitrate EMH 5/20/2005 EPA 353.2 0.01 0.61 mg/I as N Nitrogen, Nitrite EMH 5/20/2005 EPA 353.2 0.01 0.01 mg/I as N Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl EMH 6/2/2005 EPA 351.2 0.01 1.72, mg/I as N Nitrogen, Total EMH 6/2/2005 SM4500 0.01 2.34 mg/I This Certificate is for the physical and/or chemical characteristics of the sample as Comments:

cc: Mr. Greg Elmore Southern Nuclear Quality Control ________________________ Supervision_____________________________ Date: 10-Jun-05 Page 1 smk/NC

Attachment 8 to U.S. EPA Form 351 O-2F Section VIID. Sampling/Flow Measurement Methodology Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant NPDES No. AL0024619 Submitted by Southern Nuclear Operating Company August 2005

Form 2F,Section VII(D) Description of Sampling/Flow Measurement Methodology Farley Nuclear Plant The collection of the sample for the reported analyses was performed using appropriate sample containers, sample preservation and holding times. For the parameters of pH and oil and grease, grab samples were taken during the first thirty (30) minutes of the discharge as required. For all other parameters, both a grab sample collected during the first thirty (30) minutes of the discharge and a flow-weighted composite sample were taken for analysis. All samples were collected from the discharge resulting from a storm event greater than 0.1 inches (0.51 inches total rainfall).

Flow rate was determined by estimating the velocity of the storm water in the discharge and measuring the wetted cross-sectional area. Based on repeated measurements conducted over the duration of the sampling event, the maximum observed flow rate was 239 gallons per minute.

EPA Form 2F Attachment 8 Measurement Methodology Page 1 of 1 A

NL-05-1512, NPDES Permit Renewal

Contents

Text

Enclosure:

Dear Mr. Glenn:

Enclosure:

Enclosure:

Title:

Contact:

Title:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Navigation menu

NL-05-1512, NPDES Permit Renewal

Text

Enclosure:

Dear Mr. Glenn:

Enclosure:

Enclosure:

Title:

Contact:

Title:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Navigation menu

Search