NG-10-0205, Comment (1) of Christopher Costanzo, on Behalf of NextEra Energy Duane Arnold on Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Supplement 42 Regarding Duane Arnold Energy Center

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (1) of Christopher Costanzo, on Behalf of NextEra Energy Duane Arnold on Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Supplement 42 Regarding Duane Arnold Energy Center
ML101110055
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/15/2010
From: Costanzo C
NextEra Energy Duane Arnold
To:
Rulemaking, Directives, and Editing Branch
References
75FR6737 00001, FOIA/PA-2010-0209, NG-10-0205, NUREG-1437 S42
Download: ML101110055 (7)


Text

NExTera ENER G7 April 15, 2010 NG-10-0205 Chief, Rulemaking and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services Office of Administration c9/A9AD/ Ž~

Mailstop T-6D59 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

§Ž1/2~6757' *1 771'ý Duane Arnold Energy Center Docket 50-331 2

License No. DPR-49 UJ

___J

Subject:

Comments on Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Supplement 42 Regarding Duane Arnold Energy Center

References:

NUREG-1437 Supplement 42 Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Supplement 42 Reqardingq Duane Arnold Enerav Center Draft ReDort for Comment NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC ("NextEra") would like to take the opportunity to comment on the referenced Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

("DSEIS") for the Duane Arnold Energy Center. NextEra's comments are attached and have been categorized as either substantive or editorial. The three most significant comments are contained in this letter as well as the attachment.

First, as currently written, the wording of line 36 on page 2-24 could be interpreted as requiring the Iowa Department of Natural Resources ("DNR") to issue a new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit before the NRC can issue a renewed license. NextEra's current NPDES permit is valid and the NRC's issuance of a renewed license should not be predicated on the issuance of a renewed NPDES permit.

This position is based on NextEra's timely application for renewal of the NPDES permit with the Iowa DNR. In regard to all other permits listed in Table 1-2, NextEra has confirmed that all have been renewed with the exception of those associated with a one-time dredging operation (PF07-015,06-141 and 07-175).

Second, the corporate name "FPL Energy Duane Arnold, LLC" was changed to "NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC" in April 2009, several months after the license renewal application was filed'. To avoid any confusion, we suggest that "FPL Energy Duane Arnold, LLC (FPL-DA)" be replaced with "NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, fka FPL Energy Duane Arnold, LLC (FPL-DA)" in the Abstract (page v line 2), Executive Summary (page xv line 3), and Section 1.1 Proposed Federal Action (page 1-1 line 18).

5c:) k)*Li?

~j '-/ d. ~Qe/6'* ~V'2 NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, 3277 DAEC Road, Palo, IA 52324

NG-10-0205 Page 2 of 2 Finally, in regard to the conclusion that the potential impact of renewed operation on historic and archaeological resources at DAEC could be MODERATE, NextEra completed the development of a Cultural Resources Protection Plan and corresponding implementation procedures in December 2009. The plan was a collaborative effort with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), a division of the State Historic Society of Iowa, and is on file with the Society. A copy of the plan has been provided to the NRC's License Renewal Project Manager (Environmental). As the NRC states on page 4-21 of the DSEIS, "[r]evised procedures and development of a cultural resources management plan would address potential impacts to both known and undiscovered resources." Given that a Cultural Resources Protection Plan has been implemented and is on file with the SHPO, implementing procedures are in effect, and no refurbishment activities are scheduled, the MODERATE impact finding is no longer warranted. A conclusion of a SMALL impact is more appropriate.

If you have any questions regarding these comments or require any additional information, please contact Mr. Herb Giorgio at (319) 851-7264.

Sincerely, Christopher R. Costanzo Vice President, Duane Arnold Energy Center NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC : Comments on Draft SEIS for License Renewal of Duane Arnold Energy Center cc: Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, DAEC, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, DAEC, USNRC License Renewal Project Manager, USNRC License Renewal Inspection Team Lead, Region III, USNRC M. Rasmusson (Iowa Department of Public Health)

Attachment I to NG 10-0205 Comments on Draft SEIS for License Renewal of Duane Arnold Energy Center Page Line Comment Type v 2 The corporate name "FPL Energy Duane Arnold, LLC" was changed to Substantive xv 3 "NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC" in April 2009, several months after 1-1 18 the license renewal application was filed. To avoid any confusion, we suggest that "FPL Energy Duane Arnold, LLC (FPL-DA)" be replaced with "NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, fka FPL Energy Duane Arnold, LLC (FPL-DA)" in the Abstract (page v line 2), Executive Summary (page xv line 3), and Section 1.1 Proposed Federal Action (page 1-1 line 18). The NRC may also consider making conforming changes to the remainder of the DSEIS.

xviii 33-35 In December 2009, Duane Arnold completed the development of a Substantive 4-21 10-12 Cultural Resources Protection Plan and corresponding implementation 4-21 23-28 procedures. The plan was a collaborative effort with the State Historic 4-37 28-33 Preservation Office (SHPO), a division of the State Historic Society of Iowa and is on file with the society. Given that a plan is in place and no refurbishment activities 'are scheduled, a conclusion of SMALL seems more appropriate.

xx Table I-1 This table needs to be reconciled against the prose in the introduction Substantive section, the tables in Section 8, the prose in Section 8 and the prose in Section 4. For example:

1) For DAEC License Renewal, Land Use is designated S to M in Table I-1 while the prose on page xvi lines 27-29 and page 4-1 lines 14-19 state SMALL.
2) The tables in Section 8 do not include the impact on Land Use for any of the alternatives as it is considered as a subset of Socioeconomic Impacts.
3) For the Combination Alternative, Socioeconomics is designated S to M, while the table on page 8-26 and supporting prose in Section 8-3 stipulate SMALL to LARGE.

1-9 Table 1-2 With the exception of the NPDES permit and the one time dredging Substantive 2-24 36 permits (PF07-015, 06-141and 07-175) all applicable permits have been C-3 TableC-2 renewed. In regard to the NPDES permit, Duane Arnold made a timely application for renewal and the application is under review by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources. Therefore, the permit issued July 2007 is valid.

2-9 2 & 12 These sentences imply that Duane Arnold routinely solidifies liquid waste. Substantive This is inconsistent with the statement on page 2-8, lines 3940 and with the Environmental Report. To the extent practical, liquid waste is purified and recycled. The sentence on line 2 should be reworded to say: "To the extent possible liquid waste is purified and recycled. If that is not feasible the liquid is evaporated and the sludge solidified." Similarly, the sentence on Line 12 should be reworded to say: "As indicated earlier, the liquid waste is purified and recycled, however..."

Re: Docket No. 50-331; NRC-2010-0048 Page 1 of 5

Attachment I to NG 10-0205 Comments on Draft SEIS for License Renewal of Duane Arnold Energy Center Page Line Comment Type 2-12 24 The topic of mixed waste is contained in three subsections: 2.1.2.3 Substantive Radioactive Solid Waste (pg 2-10 lines 1 1-18); 2.1.2.4 Nonradioactive Hazardous Waste Streams (pg 2-12 lines 6-10); and 2.1.2.5 Mixed Waste (pg 2-12 lines 25-30). This makes it difficult to determine how mixed waste is handled at the plant. Significant information should be consolidated in section 2.1.2.5. If need be, the othersections could have pointer sentences referring to the Mixed Waste section.

2-17 32, 33. Well water is used to cool many systems in the plant. Suggest wording Substantive this sentence as follows: "The DAEC relies on the Cedar River as its source of makeup water for its condenser cooling system, and it discharges various waste flows to the river."

2-26 4, 6 The two references to "new" permit should be changed to "renewed". Substantive, 2-28 12 As currently written, this sentence implies the entire city was evacuated. Substantive That was not the case. Suggest replacing "The city of Cedar Rapids..."

with "Portions of the city of Cedar Rapids..."

2-33 32-33 Given that a squawfoot shell was found in the vicinity of DAEC in 2002, Substantive perhaps this should be worded more equivocally: "Although a dead squawfoot was found upstream of DAEC in 2002, no live specimens have been collected in recent years.

2-43 22 To be consistent with Table 2-6, this should be 89%. Substantive 4-4 Table 4-4 "Altered Salinity" should not be included in this table as it is not Substantive applicable for Duane Arnold.-

4-36 32 . The. Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement should address the Substantive impact on Iowa not Nebraska. If this is a typo merely change, otherwise the CDC's records for Iowa should be examined.

5-7 26 Should read "SAMA 117 - Increase boron concentration or enrichment in Substantive the SLC system." Enriching the B-O1is what is being examined in more detail.

6-1 .25 Should refer to FPL-DA not NPPD. Substantive 6-11 19-20 Delete this reference. Add FPL Energy Duane Arnold's Environmental Substantive Report as a reference.

8-2 Side Box The alternatives listed in the box are not consistent with those listed in Substantive Section 8.4. Methane and Wind are included in the box, but are not included in Section 8.4 Conversely, Offsite Coal and Gas Fired Capacity is addressed in Section 8.4.1 but not included in the box.

8-2 14 Depending on the disposition of the comment regarding the box on this Substantive page, 17 may or may not be the appropriate number of discreet alternatives considered.

8-5 Tables 8-1, These tables, and their corresponding prose, have Land Use as a subset of Substantive 8-17 8-2, 8-3 Socioeconomic. On page xx Table 1 -1, Land Use is considered on its 8-26 and 8-4 own.

Re: Docket No. 50-331; NRC-2010-0048 Page 2 of 5

Attachment I to NG 10-0205 Comments on Draft SEIS for License Renewal of Duane Arnold Energy Center -

Page Line Comment LType 8-9 23-30 This is inconsistent with the conclusion of SMALL to MODERATE on Substantive page 4-6 lines 9-13. Both the new coal plant and continued operation of the DAEC will consume about 11 million gallons of river water a day.

The impact on surface water use should be the same.

8-37 31 Consider revising this analysis to reflect Iowa instead of Nebraska. Substantive 8-45 Table 8-5 For Combination Alternative, Socioeconomics is designated SMALL to Substantive vs 8-3 MODERATE. This does not match the SMALL to LARGE designation on Table 8-3 (page 8-26) nor the prose in Section 8-3.

F-11 Table G-4 The last descriptive case is a repeat of the second to the last case. It should Substantive be removed, and the core damage frequency for "Others" changed to 3.1 E-07.

F-23 26 $14,000 should be $8,000 as the external events accounts for 36% of the Substantive total ( 0.57/1.57). $23,000 x 36% = $8,000.

30 Similarly, $140,000 should be $80,000.

xvii 3 Change "...are a Category 2..." to "...is a Category 2..." Editorial 1-7 9 This should be the Iowa State Archaeologist Editorial 2-13 27 Delete "Information Technology Council". The name of the company is Editorial xxv 5 ITC Midwest LLC. ITC is neither an abbreviation nor an acronym.

4-8 23 2-14 7 & 14 "...500-foot (153-m)..." should be "...665-foot (203-m)..." Editorial 2-14 10 & 17 "...665-foot (203-m)..." should be "...500-foot (153-m)..." Editorial 2-14 13 "...Hills substation feed..." should be "...Hazelton substation feed..." Editorial 2-17 7-8 The sentence "Water that is lost through cooling tower evaporation.., is Editorial S.. .. termed 'makeup' water" is confusing: The lost water isn't called makeup.

water. Water used to replenish these losses is called makeup water.

Suggest the sentence be reworded to: "Water which is replenished due to losses through cooling tower evaporation ... 'makeup' water."

2-19 22 Replace (47,602,000 m3) with (3.2 km). Editorial 2-22 15 Replace "...northwest from DAEC." to "...southeast from DAEC." Editorial 2-24 3 Change "...near the reactor." to "...near the reactor building." Editorial 2-24 11 The word "levy" should be "levee". Editorial 2-25 3-5 Suggest adding a sentence referring to Table 2-3 for the intended use of Editorial the chemicals.

2-29 5 As mussels are no longer an important source of food for Native Editorial Americans, change "...mussels are historically..." to "...mussels were historically..."

2-29 31 There are several small populations of mussels in the area. Suggest the Editorial term "population" be replaced with "community".

2-30 25 Ecological Analysts (1984) don't report the total number of fish collected Editorial over the five-year period, just the number of species collected each year.

They do, however, report the number of fish collected in 1983 --- 1,387.

See p. 2.2-3 of DAEC LR ER.

Re: Docket No. 50-331; NRC-2010-0048 Page 3 of 5

Attachment I to NG 10-0205 Comments on Draft SEIS for License Renewal of.Duane Arnold Energy Center Page Line Comment Type 2-31 16 Box elder is Acer negundo, not negunde Editorial 2-31 22 Two species of meadowlarks are observed. Change "...meadowlark..." to Editorial

"...meadowlarks..."

2-31 23 Change "... red-wing blackbirds..." to "...red-winged blackbirds..." Editorial 2-33 4 If possible, please provide particulars on recovery efforts (how far Editorial downstream?).

2-33 6 The text regarding downstream recovery efforts is redundant to that the Editorial text on line 4 of this page.

2-33 27 "Cyprinids" and "Ictalurids" shouldn't be italicized. Editorial 2-33 29 The common name is "river otter" and the scientific name is Lutra Editorial canadensis.

2-34 Table 2-4 The scientific name for squawfoot is Strophitus undulatus. Editorial 2-38 Table 2-5 The scientific name for prince's pine is Chimaphila umbellata Editorial 2-41 3 Duane Arnold schedules refueling outages at 18 to 24 month intervals. Editorial 2-42 15 "... (gallons per day)..." should be "...(million gallons per day)..." Editorial 2-50 15 This line indicates there are 74 properties in Linn County that are listed Editorial on the National Register of Historic Places. The ER indicates that there are 75 properties. (ER page 2.11-3 second ¶).

4-6 Table 4-5 "Stimulhtion of nuisance organisms" should be included in this table Editorial (GELS reference 4.2.2.1.11, Category 1) 4-6 12 ... impact on groundwater..." should be ":... impact on surface water..." Editorial 4-10 28 & 36 Rem and rad are no longer considered to be acronyms. They are just Editorial special units of dose equivalent and absorbed dose,*respectively.

4-13 40 Biannually can mean either once every two years or twice a year. To Editorial avoid confusion the term biennially should be used.

4-14 13 EMF is defined as electromagnetic force on line 13, but used as Editorial electromagnetic field on line 29.

4-21 29-36 This is a repeat of lines 5-12 on the same page. Editorial 4-22 1-14 This is a repeat of lines 17-28 on page 4-21. Editorial 4-29 16 Change "...or lower levels..." to "...or lower..." Editorial 4-36 32 Nebraska should be Iowa. Editorial 4-37 15 Lynn should be Linn. Editorial 5-1ff. There are multiple references to Appendix G, which should be Appendix Editorial F..

5-5 6 For consistency, we suggest providing the dose calculations in rem first, Editorial followed by sieverts.

6-1 2 Solid waste management is only mentioned in.the title of the section. Editorial Should there be more information in the section?

8-2 41 Biological is referred to as Terrestrial and Aquatic Resources in Editorial subsequent sections. This could cause some confusion.

Re: Docket No. 50-331; NRC-2010-0048 Page 4 of 5

Attachment I to NG 10-0205 Comments on Draft SEIS for License Renewal of Duane Arnold Energy Center Page Line Comment Type 8-5 Tables 8-1 For Continued DAEC Operation, Groundwater is categorized as SMALL Editorial 8-17 & 8-2 to MODERATE. The text in Section 4.3 concludes that the impact is 8-26 SMALL.

8-5 Tables 8-1 For Continued DAEC Operation, Surface Water is categorized as SMALL. Editorial 8-17 & 8-2 The text in Section 4.4 conclude that the impact is SMALL to 8-26 MODERATE.

8-23 38 "...coal-fired alternative ... " should be "... gas-fired alternative..." Editorial 8-46 9 Should this be referencing an Iowa site rather than a Nebraska site? Editorial 8-36 3-11 This paragraph indicates that "...FPL-DA indicated that it is unlikely that a Editorial nuclear alternative could be sited, constructed and operational by the time DAEC operating license expires in February of 2014." Although FPL-DA did not make the statement, and analyzed the potential impacts of constructing a new nuclear facility at the DAEC site, we do agree that it would be unlikely that a new reactor could be on line before the expiration of the current operating license.

Chapter 8 NRC did not use the analysis prepared by FPL-DA for input to the Editorial alternatives analysis in the DEIS. Consequently, the various numbers cited for coal- and gas-fired emissions, land use, waste, etc. differ from those presented in the ER. In general, the numerical values cited by NRC are larger than those presented in the ER and NRC conclusions based on those values indicate impacts from the various alternatives would be larger than those estimated by FPL-DA. The less conservative assumptions and conclusions in the DEIS support the case for license renewal.

F-4 15 Most tables in this section are given a G- designation rather than an' F- Editorial designation.

F-34 4¶ Change "...loss of offsite peer risk..." to ". .. loss of offsite power risk..." Editorial line 7 Re: Docket No. 50-331; NRC-2010-0048 Page 5 of 5