ML25140A884
| ML25140A884 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 12/03/2024 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III/DORS/OB |
| To: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| James C. Nance | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML22336A061 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML25140A884 (1) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:1] Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Qualify Checklist 4' Facility pe.mH Date °f Examination: i2Fi (21 Item Task Description (Y)es / (N)O a b* c# W
- a. The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the Y
Y R instructions in Section 8 of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and abillty (K/A) categones are lTTEN appropriately sampled.
- b. The outline does not overemphasize any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
Y NIA Y
- c. Justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are acceptable.
Y tu\\A Y S
- a. Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, verify that the proposed scenario Y
N\\^ Y I set contains the required number of normal evolutions, reactivity evolutlons, Instrument M and component failures, manual control evolutions, technlcal speclfications, and major UL transients.
- b. There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of Y
t`h Y' A applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule T without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be repeated on 0R subsequent days.
- c. Ensure that all scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4 y
u\\4 Y and that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).
- d. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and Y
N)A Y c]uantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2. J
- a. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on Y
IVIA V PMS Form 3.21 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s). \\
- Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria specified in Y
N)A Y the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).
- c. Determine whether the number of job performance measures (JPMs) and JPM types is Y
Nl^ Y sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. G
- a. Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plantspecific priorities (including Y
wl{ y' EN probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights).
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41,10 CFR 55.43, and 10 CFR 55.45 sampling is Y
N\\A i ER appropriate.
- c. Check whether K/A importance ratings (except for plantspecific priorities) are greater Y ut Y
AL than or equal to 2.5.
- d. Check for duplication and overlap across the exam and with the last two NRC exams.
Y M^ Y
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
Y ivu Y
- f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (reactor operator or senior Y t`\\4 V
reactor operatQn iA ) `.a.A`u<rh'or Pr'nte:, r2ar\\e+/-S'gnatur B =,`,,<,3=4°8itraLas (2t ( Li b FacIIltyRevlgr` ' u Le&c D~`.(ope#-PK `` Pc'+\\CJ~re'Sh _? c.NRC Reviewer (#) ~` `'--=Z=i<'tz~7~lC¢'c.`c{J\\\\(2\\l?C-Jc'`-\\ NRCchlefExaml r_>>z=', dr~ps ¢ucrty`.a ;z;-# (2D2H NR!csupewisor -T=ul, \\ -*.If~..al. I-zl ~3 / a:I;L-l
- The facilfty licensee signature is not ap`plicable for NRcdeveloped tests.
- An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column "c." This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outline under review.
b*#¢:.-+i:.:l@:?n3e`f-Ttr-:1-{-:r:.iv`._oc\\:,u`o^-:c*bDchs"-EJ-,i:::-`rsto'\\^`4}}