ML25016A288
| ML25016A288 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/31/1971 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research |
| To: | |
| References | |
| RG-1.007, Rev. 0 | |
| Download: ML25016A288 (1) | |
Text
3 ' lll/il SAFETY GUIDE 7 CONTROL OF COMBUSTIBLE GAS CONCENTRATIONS IN CONTAINMENT FOLLOWING A LOSS OF COOLANT ACCIDENT A. Introduction General Desi~n Criteri1,n 'J 1*equires that systems t*, t11ntrol hy<irog,m, ff\\-ygcn, and other subst~nccs which may be rel('asecl into the reac-tor containment be prr,virled as necessary to control thei1* concentrations followmR" postu-lated aC'cidents to assure that containment in-tegrity is maintained. Thi;; guide describes an accept.able method of implementing this cri-terion.
B. Discu~on Following a lo~s of coolant accident, hydrogen gas may accumulate within the containment as a result of:
- 1. Metal-water reaction inrnh-ing the zirconium fuel cladding and the reactor coolant.
- 2. Radiolytir decompo!lition of the post-accident emergency cooling solutions (oxygen will also e,*olve in this proc-ess).
- 3. Corrosion of metal!:! by solutions used for emergency coolin!,! or containment spray.
If a sufficient amount of hydrogen is gen-erated, it m:iy react with the oxygen present in the containment atmosphere or, in the case of inetted containments, with the oxygen gener-ated following the accident. The reaction would take place at rntes rapid enough to lead to high temperatures and sismific-ant overpr,,s~urization of the containment, which could reqult in a loAs of integrity. Damage to systems and compon-ents essential to the continued coTJtrol of the post loss of coolant accident conditions could also occur.
The extent of metal-water reaction and asso-ciated h~*drogen production depend11 strongly on the course of events assumed for the accident and on the r.ffectiveness of emergency cooling 7.1 Ry:-;tem11. The rate of produdion <'f J!ll!'i**!I from radi,)l)*sis of c*1,olant solutions dept*ndi: on ( 1) the amount *ind q 1iahtr of racfo.tion encrJ.,ry ab-sorbed in the specific coolin~ solution~ employed and (2) the net yield of gases generated from the solutionR due to the absorbed radiation en-erll)*. Factors such as coola 1t flow rates and turbulence, chemical additives in the coolant, impurities, ancl coolant temperature can all ex-ert an influence on the gas yiPlds from radiolr-sis. The hydrogen production rate from cor.
rosion of materiah, within the containment, such as aluminum. depends on the corrMion rate which in turn depend!! on such factor:. as the coolant chemistry, the coolant pH, the metal and cooh,nt temperatures, and th<> surface arPa exposed to attack by the coolant...\\ccurate
,*aluec; d th1;- *n parameters are difficult to estab-lish with certainty for the conditions exr,eeted to pre-.*ail followin,R' a loss of cor,Jant accident.
The regulatory staff has revit*,,*ed the av:,il-able information concerning these pnrameters, including the results of cakulatwm1 and cXf>eri-ments. Table l defines values and other as-sumptions which the stnff belic,*es to b0 ren~on.
ably comien-ative that may be m;erl for purpo. e.
of "V'lluating the production of combustlblt!
raAe~ 1oi1owing a los of coolant acl'idcnt.
If these a~sumr,tions are used to calrulnte the concencration of hydrogt*n (1111d o ygen) within the containment structure. of r('actor plant14 of current dMig:1s following :1 lo"~ of coolant 11ctident, the* hyilroiren concent rat iun is cult*ulatPd to renc-h th,! flammnblt* limit within pc,riodH of less thnn a day uft<*r the an*ident for the 11malleMt ('Ontainmcntl:! and up to more than a month for the largP~t one~. Th1.: hyrlroi*en concentration could be mmntair.ed helow it lower fhtmmnblr limit by pur,1,inv 1hl' rnnfain-ment atmrn,pherc to the l'Il\\'iron-, at JI ('Olltrollc*tJ rate after the loss of coolant acddcnt; howevn,
radio ctive mat ri I in th cC1n* inment al.to be rele~ ed. If purging becnme n shortly after th ccid nt. qu ntiti of m ter1 l ~ *ould b, rcl ed.
In mall cont inm n the runo mt of m t 1-v.. t r re dion po tul ted in 'T ble ult in hyrlrogen concentrat' a
nbl limi The
- n from the m tnl-t u
th n that from eith Operation of sm"ll rt (oxygen defkient) ufficicnt tim f u
ble gas control terns to ttduce th tr. tion of h:rdr f
of' accident before the rn d b oiJ;~is ~ul* in fi..
res in the con-t inm nt.
It 1s therefore ad ~ bl to pro\\;d r
- rrunng, mpting nd I
ulH tio of essarily invol to th en,;
pro\\;de th m nt of ra teri co p
~n at pie.
n of
- d.
- 1.
ter..cooled po er r cto.r f cili-ti hould ha,;
the capability for measuring the hydro n concentration and for mixing the tmosphere in the con inment following a lo of coolant ccident, nd for contro11ing combuAi-b e concentratiQm without reliance on purging of the containment atmc...
phere.
The continuous presence of 7.2 combu tihlc gns contr >I c11uipment the 11itc may not bt> nC<'
ry pr,vuied it
- nvnllnble on un npproprintc time ralc; how *v1 r, :~~11roprint d htn nn,1-pro durd pro,*1 10n11 ~hould l>
mad for its u.r,
- 2. Combu tlblt>
1trol 8YII rm!\\ rand th ixini?, me.1suring, h
cl Aign,
- , ent'rRl' r qmr*-
- f tu, oulrl m,t Intro 1 t mn
- ff t
- 3.
()
l r
i t-i\\
Ion P
l T
in
,1 s
I-r n g !I ro11-cc1 nd t*v lu-ti ntrol nnd to evolv d in of coolnnt ucrid *nt.
,
- be l'hnnged on th ion I expcrimmtnl <'\\'l*-
ily. s.
- 5.
Is within the contninmcnt thnt ield hydro en gn clue to corro-from the emergency <'l olin or cont inm nt spray olution thould he idC'1 tifl d and thPir u* *.~houlu be lim*
it('(} as. much as practical.
TABLE 1
- l.
raetion or fll!lllon prod-uct radiation encr :-y al>*
orbed by the coolant'
{a) flrta
( 1) Bt.'t II from fis~ion product in tht fu I roJ : 0 (2) Betas from fission produt't lntimat- -
ly mix1:d with cool-ant: 1.0 (b) Gamma
( l) Gamm,, from fis-sion pr-oducta in the fuel rods, coolant in (.;Ore region: 0.1'
TABLE 1-(cont.)
- 2. G(H,)'
(2) Gammas from fii.-
sion producb inti-mately mixed with coolant, ull coolant:
1.0 9.5 molecules/l0Oev
- 3. G(O,)'
0.25 molecu1es/100ev
- 4. Extent of metal-wa~r re-action (percentage of fuel cladding th:it reacts with water) 5
- 5. Aluminum corrosion rate for allll'ninum exposed to alkaline solutions. (This value should be adjusteJ upwan! for higher tem-peratures early in the ac-cident ~equence)
- 6. Fission product distrihu-tion model 200 mils/yr (a) 50,;t,-
of the h.alo-gens and l "', of the solids present In the core are intimately mixed with the coolant water.
7.3 TABLE 1-(eont.)
(b) All noble,zasl' nre releas,,d ttl the roJ".
tainment.
(c) All other fis~ion products remain in fuel rods.
- 7. (a) Hydrogen concentra-4 volume percent tion limit (Thi& limit
£hould not be excet-d-ed if more than 5 vol-ume :percent oxygen is present.)
(b) Oxygen concentration 5 volume percent limit (This limit should not be exceed-ed if more than 4 vol-ume J)ettl'nt hydrogen is present.)
l For water, borat,d water, and borated alkaline solu-tions; for other solution!', data should hfo presented.
- This fraction is thought to be conservative: furthrr anal)'sis may show that it should be revised.
SUPPi E E T TO SAFETY UIOE 1 CO TROL OF COMBUSTIBLE GAS CONCENTRATIONS IN CONT INMENT FOLLOWING A LOSS OF COOLA T ACCIO NT BACKFITTING CONSIDERATIONS flllll \\\\ J
~
I l(l ontnrm I
h~ Jll't 7 I
- llld' I'll r to
'I 1111111 tl!l"n',1ll1*r pr.1 11,1t,ll' II 1h,11 lor I I*\\ 1 l,1111 111 lh1 I"*
,111
\\ ii ul.11\\*.J t
J 111111*111 1
1111 (
ol h I\\
- 11
,. \\ h
- 11 1hl I \\
- lor 11 11 Ill 11 fuflll' tul. \\\\1II I,*
\\l
- ,I,111,Ill 11tdl\\11111.1I
,I I I,,I I,I I II h
- I\\ \\ I 11111 I I h l I I "** h' f r.1d11*h *1.,I \\\\Ill
<111111.1* ol 1*111 *m 111d lhl p 1p11l.1111111 11 tril 1111,,11 111d,h n II\\
1m,,u111h11~ lh
- I I 1t1I l'I 11 I lllr h1d1 1111* 11011 1* ol h *.u111
- 011
- 'I I II.1111111 for 011,1 Ith troll p I 11111 WI pubh I, d h1 l11r I ',*111h~r
~,:
I Jt, shnuld furn, h 111for111Jt1on to 1(11 n*
- 1IJIPr}
1.111 fl' J1d1n
- 1111. ~.,I ulJtcd I,
lro111 pur~111 *. 11 rn
- th,*,1 11111pt:1m,
'\\ 11< n ( ol th,*.11\\'I} 1!t111k. I ht* nc *d h,1 k11t11ng till>\\'
- pl1111,
\\\\rll he l)II 1tkt1*ll,111,111 ltldl\\ 1L111.1I lil l' hJ 1,