ML24073A319
| ML24073A319 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hermes File:Kairos Power icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/13/2024 |
| From: | Kairos Power |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML24073A317 | List: |
| References | |
| KP-NRC-2403-004 | |
| Download: ML24073A319 (1) | |
Text
PreliminarySafetyAnalysisReport
AccidentAnalysis
KairosPowerHermes2,Units1and2 132 Revision0 13.1 INITIATINGEVENTSANDSCENARIOS Thissectionprovidestheeventspostulatedforthereactordesignbasis.Theeventsaregrouped accordingtotypeandcharacteristicsoftheevents.Theeventcategoriesare:
MHA InsertionofExcessReactivity SaltSpills LossofForcedCirculation(includesalossofnormalelectricpower)
MishandlingorMalfunctionofPebbleHandlingandStorageSystem RadioactiveReleasefromaSubsystemorComponent GeneralChallengestoNormalOperation InternalandExternalHazardEvents TheMHAisascenariothatboundsotherpostulatedeventgroups.TheanalysisoftheMHAin Section13.2demonstratesthesafetymarginsofthedesign.
Forpostulatedevents,figuresofmeritforeacheventcategoryprovidesurrogatemetricswhich demonstratethattheresultingdoseisboundedbythedoseconsequencesoftheMHAanalysisas describedinKPTR022P,PostulatedEventMethodologyTechnicalReport(Reference2).Acceptance criteriaforthesefiguresofmeritrepresentdesignlimitsthatensuretheMHAisbounding.The acceptancecriteriaforthepostulatedeventfiguresofmeritareprovidedinTable13.11.
Theconsequencesofpostulatedeventspresentedinthischapterwouldnormallybemitigatedbynon safetyrelatedSSCsforreactivitycontrolandheatremoval(andthebuildingforconfinementif radioactivematerialisreleased).However,consistentwiththeguidanceinNUREG1537,onlythe performanceofthesafetyrelatedstructures,systems,andcomponents(SSCs)arecreditedinthe postulatedevents.TheperformanceoftheSSCsalsoassumetheworstsinglefailureofanyactive components.Thisconservativeapproachtosafetyanalysisprovidesadditionalconfidencethatthe postulatedeventsareboundedbytheMHA.ThesafetyclassificationsofSSCsareprovidedin Section3.6.
ThediscussiononpreventingcertaineventsbydesignisprovidedinSection13.1.10.
ThepostulatedeventnarrativesandmethodspresentedinthischapterareinformedbytheHermes PostulatedEventMethodologytechnicalreport,KPTR018(Reference6).Thisisanappropriate precedent,giventhesimilaritiesbetweentheHermesandHermes2designs.Hermes2employsthe samefunctionalcontainmentstrategyasHermes,andincludeseverysafetyfeature(e.g.,DHRS)ofthe Hermesdesign.TodeveloptheHermes2postulatedeventmethodology(KPTR022),theevent narrativesandmethodsdescribedinKPTR018wereaugmentedbyassessingnewpotentialevent initiatorsidentifiedfortheHermes2design.
Hermes2includesanintermediateheattransportsystem(IHTS)andapowergenerationsystemas describedinPSARchapter5and9,respectively.AdditionalsafetyfeaturesinHermes2includetheIHTS rupturediscsdescribedinPSARSection5.2andareactorprotectionsystem(RPS)triponthe intermediatesaltpump(ISP)describedinPSARSection7.3.Limitsontheamountsofmaterialatriskin theIHTSandpowergenerationsystems,andlimitsontheallowableamountsofFlibeandwaterinthe IHTSaredescribedinChapter14.Theseadditionalsafetyfeaturesandproposedlimitsensurethat eventsresultingfrompostulatedfailuresoftheIHTSorpowergenerationsystemsareeitherprevented bydesign,orcanbegroupedwithintheeventcategoriesdescribedinKPTR018.Groupedevents specifictotheHermes2design(i.e.,IHTSspill,steamlinebreak,ISPfailure)donotintroducenew phenomenathatrequireadditionalfiguresofmerittobeevaluatedtoensurethattheconsequencesof
PreliminarySafetyAnalysisReport
AccidentAnalysis
KairosPowerHermes2,Units1and2 133 Revision0 postulatedeventsremainboundedbytheMHA.Therefore,thefiguresofmeritdescribedinKPTR018 areapplicabletotheHermes2postulatedeventmethods.AsdescribedinKPTR022,eventsare groupedbasedonsimilarcharacteristicsandmodelingapproaches,includingeventsspecifictothe Hermes2design.
Certaininitiatorsmayresultinatransientinbothunits(e.g.,turbinetrip).However,theunitsare independenttotheextentthattheeventprogressionandunitresponsecanbeevaluatedforeachunit separately.
13.1.1 MaximumHypotheticalAccident TheMHAisaneventwherehypothesizedconditionsresultinaconservativelyanalyzedreleaseof radionuclidesthatboundsapotentialreleasefromotherpostulatedevents.TheMHAanalysisis consistentwiththefissionproductreleaseaccidentanalysisrequiredforthe10CFR100.11 determinationofexclusionarea,lowpopulationzone,andpopulationcenterdistances.TheMHAisa boundingeventwithconservativeradionuclidetransportassumptionsthatchallengetheimportant radioactiveretentionfeaturesofthefunctionalcontainment.Thissectiondescribesthekeyassumptions andnonphysicalconditionsthatarehypothesizedtoensurethatthedoseconsequencesfromtheMHA analysisboundsthedoseconsequencesfrompostulatedeventsinthedesignbasis.Thedetails associatedwiththeseassumptions,aswellasthemethodsusedtocalculatethedoseconsequencesof theMHAareprovidedinSection13.2.1.
13.1.1.1 InitialConditionsAssumptions NormaloperatingparametersarediscussedinSection4.1.Conservativeinitialvaluesareassumedfor eachoperatingparametertomaximizethereleaseofradionuclidesintheMHA.
TheradioactivematerialthatisatriskforreleasefortheMHAincludesradionuclidescontainedinthe fuel,theradionuclidescirculatingintheFlibe,andtheradioactivematerialatriskforrelease(MAR) distributedwithintheprimarysystem(i.e.,steelstructuresandgraphite).Althoughradionuclidescould havediffusedawayfromthetristructuralisotropic(TRISO)fuelparticles,theinitialinventoryofthe smallfractionoffuelthatisdefectiveattheinitiationofthetransientassumesthatnodiffusionhas occurred.Thishypotheticalconditionaddsaboundingconservatismtotheradionuclidereleasefrom thefuelandFlibe.
TheTRISOfuelformandthebasisforitsradionuclideretentionperformanceisdiscussedinSection 4.2.1.Themethodologyfordeterminingtheradionuclidebehaviorandretentionpropertiesofthefuelis providedinSection3ofKPTR012,KPFHRMechanisticSourceTermMethodologyTopicalReport, (Reference1).Fuelmanufacturingandinserviceperformancespecificationsarediscussedin Section4.2.1.
TheFlibedesignisdiscussedinSection5.1.Themethodologyfordeterminingtheradionuclidebehavior andretentionpropertiesoftheFlibeisprovidedinSection4ofReference1.AboundingvalueforFlibe circulatingactivityisassumedastheinitialcondition.
Aboundingvalueofretainedtritiumandactivatedargonavailableforreleaseisassumedtoencompass availablevolumeandgeometryoftritiumabsorbingmaterialsinthesystem.
13.1.1.2 Structures,SystemsandComponentsMitigationAssumptions Thissectiondescribesthestructures,systems,andcomponents(SSCs)thatperformafunctionto mitigatethedoseconsequencesoftheMHA.
PreliminarySafetyAnalysisReport
AccidentAnalysis
KairosPowerHermes2,Units1and2 1321 Revision0 TheradionuclidesevaporatedfromtheFlibefreesurfaceareseparatedintothefollowingrelease inventories:
- 1)
PuffreleaseofdissolvednoblegasesandbubbleburstFlibeaerosolsatthebeginningofthe transient;
- 2)
Onelinearreleaseforevaporationofradionuclidesoverthefirst10mintemperatureinterval correspondingtoprescrammedfueltemperature
- 3)
Onelinearreleaseforevaporationofradionuclidesoverthenext110mintemperatureinterval;
- 4)
Onelinearreleaseforevaporationofradionuclidesoverthenext70hourreleaseinterval;
- 5)
Onelinearreleaseperdayforthenextsevendaysforthereactorcooldownperiod;and
- 6)
Onefinallinearreleaseovertheremaining20days.
GasSpace Thegasspacetransportevaluationisdividedintotwomodels:buildingtransportandatmospheric dispersion.ThemethodologyforDesignBasisAccidentsinReference1isusedtoevaluatethegasspace transport.The
valuesarecalculatedasdescribedinSection2.3.4foranassumedexclusionarea boundary(EAB)distanceof250mandalowpopulationzone(LPZ)distanceof800masprovidedin Section2.1.1.2.TheX/QvaluesareprovidedinTable13.21.
13.2.1.2 Results ThedoseconsequencesoftheMHAareprovidedinTable13.22.Thedoseconsequenceresultsmeet thesitedoselimitsin10CFR100.11(a)(12)attheEABandLPZwithsignificantmargin.
13.2.2 PostulatedEventMethodologyandSampleResults Theevaluationmodelsandmethodologiesusedtoanalyzethepostulatedeventsdescribedin Section13.1aredetailedinthePostulatedEventMethodologyTechnicalReport(Reference2).The methodologiesincludetherationaleforthefiguresormeritandtheassociatedacceptancecriteria (providedinTable13.11)foreachpostulatedeventcategory.Thefiguresofmeritarefiguresofmerit thatwhenanalyzedagainsttheacceptancecriteriaensurethatthepostulatedeventsresultindoses boundedbytheMHA.
13.3 REFERENCES
- 1. KairosPowerLLC,KPFHRMechanisticSourceTermMethodologyTopicalReport,KPTR012PA.
May2022.
- 2. KairosPowerLLC,Hermes2PostulatedEventMethodologyTechnicalReport,KPTR022P, Revision0.June2023.
- 3. MELCORFissionProductReleaseModelforHTGRs,SandiaNationalLaboratories,2010.
- 4. B.J.Lewis,D.Evens,F.C.Iglesias,andY.Liu,ModellingofShortLivedFissionProductRelease BehaviorDuringAnnealingConditions,JournalofNuclearMaterials,vol.238,pp.183-188,1996.
- 5. HighTemperatureGasCooledReactorFuelsandMaterials,INTERNATIONALATOMICENERGY AGENCY,Vienna,IAEATECDOC1645,2010.
5.6. KairosPowerLLC,PostulatedEventMethodologyTechnicalReport,KPTR018P,Revision2.
February2023.