ML24019A117

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Surveillance Procedure 2-SR-3.1.3.5(A), Control Rod Coupling Integrity Check, Revision 0026
ML24019A117
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 09/28/2021
From: King J
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL2-2
Green K, NRR/DORL/LPL2-2
Shared Package
ML24019A097 List:
References
Download: ML24019A117 (1)


Text

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Surveillance Procedure 2-SR-3.1.3.5(A)

Control Rod Coupling Integrity Check Revision 0026 Quality Related Level of Use: Continuous Use Level of Use or Other Information: P2308 Effective Date: 09-28-2021 Responsible Organization:

RXE, Reactor Engineering Prepared By:

Jesse V King Approved By:

Bill Williamson

BFN Unit 2 Control Rod Coupling Integrity Check 2-SR-3.1.3.5(A)

Rev. 0026 Page 6 of 362 1.2 Scope (continued)

This procedure and / or Attachment 1 may be used to record, document, or plan rod movements that otherwise do not require its performance. Those rod movements not required to be recorded by this procedure are:

x Rod moves to SCRAM the reactor.

x Rod moves to check the operability of the RWM.

x Rod moves to correct for a deviation from the RWM.

x Rod moves for CRD exercise testing per 2-SR-3.1.3.3.

x Rod moves for CRD testing per 0-TI-20 whenever not in Modes 1 or 2.

x Rod moves for CRD coupling integrity checks after refueling or maintenance per 2-SR-3.1.3.5(B).

1.3 Frequency Each time a control rod is moved except as specified in Section 1.2 by bulleted items immediately above.

1.4 Applicability Modes 1 and 2. (SR 3.1.3.5)

Modes 1 and 2 whenever the RWM is inoperable with Thermal Power d10%.

(SR 3.10.7.1)

Mode 5 with the reactor mode switch in startup/hot standby position. (SR 3.10.8.3)

BFN Unit 2 Control Rod Coupling Integrity Check 2-SR-3.1.3.5(A)

Rev. 0026 Page 15 of 362 (Page 1 of 2)

Control Rod Movement and Control Rod Drive Problem Data Sheets Date ________

Part 1: CONTROL ROD MOVEMENT DATA SHEET RWM1 GP STEP NUMBER ROD NUMBER FROM TO Rod Movement Completed Signoffs UO (AC) 2 Peer Check 3 REMARKS4:

NOTES:

1 RWM Group may be marked "N/A" when NOT applicable (i.e., when above the LPSP).

2 For all rod moves to the "full out" position (notch position 48), this signoff verifies coupling integrity was checked in accordance with 2-OI-85.

3 Documentation of Peer Check by a second qualified member of the plant staff (i.e., RE, STA OR UO) is required ONLY when the RWM is inoperable OR bypassed with core thermal power d10%.

4 Record the rod number and any problems encountered on Attachment 1, page 2 of 2, as applicable.

5 Peer Check by RE OR SRO [SRO to be utilized if a second RE is unavailable]. The SRO should be checking the FROM and TO control rod positions as a minimum. The RE OR SRO should be checking the positions identified for agreement with the Predictor Cases. Anytime the SRO feels the Peer Check is beyond his/her knowledge level, then call-in a second RE to perform the required Peer Check.

Prepared By:

/

Reviewed By5:

/

Reactor Engineer Date RE OR SRO Date Authorization to perform the Control Rod manipulations identified on this sheet

/

Unit SRO Date

BFN Unit 2 Control Rod Coupling Integrity Check 2-SR-3.1.3.5(A)

Rev. 0026 Page 16 of 362 (Page 2 of 2)

Control Rod Movement and Control Rod Drive Problem Data Sheets Date ________

Part 2: CONTROL ROD DRIVE PROBLEM DATA SHEET Control Rod DP Values (See Note)

Control Rod Positions D

N D

A R

S F

I F

W S

F NOTES/OTHER Init DP Reqd DP Init Final

()

()

()

()

()

()

Explain briefly or indicate work orders, PERs, and other documents written to disposition CRD problem q Additional sheets may be used as necessary.

q No entry is required if control rod movement was satisfactory and no other problems were noted.

q Log the initial DP, then the required (elevated) DP at which the Control Rod was successfully moved.

q Indicate CRD Movement problems and any other pertinent facts such as initial and/or final rod positions and drive pressures.

q Record in Condition Report Location Description BFN-2-CRDM-085-XX-YY, where XX-YY are the control rod coordinates.

  • Operational problems with CRDs should be documented in a Condition Report including, but not limited to, having to increase Drive Water Pressure to move rod.

DN Double Notched Rod - Indicate control rod movement (i.e., 48 to 44). Do NOT count as DN when elevated drive water DP is used.

DA Drift Alarm - Note any movement of control rod.

RS Problem with RPIS system - List rod position when incident occurred and details.

FI Failed latch at next position on Insert - Indicate initial and final or increased DP.

FW Failed Withdraw - Indicate initial and final or increased DP in the space provided.

SF Stall flow greater than 5 gpm.

BFN Unit 2 Control Rod Coupling Integrity Check 2-SR-3.1.3.5(A)

Rev. 0026 Page 17 of 362 (Page 1 of 39)

A1 Startup Sequence Control Rod Movement Data Sheet Date ________

RWM GP STEP NUMBER ROD NUMBER FROM TO Rod Movement Completed Signoffs UO (AC) 1 Peer Check 2 1

1 58-31 00 48 1

2 34-07 00 48 1

3 02-23 00 48 1

4 18-55 00 48 1

5 50-39 00 48 1

6 18-07 00 48 1

7 02-39 00 48 1

8 34-55 00 48 1

9 50-23 00 48 1

10 10-15 00 48 1

11 10-47 00 48 1

12 42-47 00 48 SRM-B 1

13 42-15 00 48 1

14 10-31 00 48 1

15 26-47 00 48 1

16 42-31 00 48 1

17 26-15 00 48 1

18 18-39 00 48 1

19 34-39 00 48 1

20 34-23 00 48 1

21 18-23 00 48 SRM-D 1

22 26-31 00 48 REMARKS3:

NOTES:

1 For all rod moves to the "full out" position (notch position 48), this signoff verifies coupling integrity was checked in accordance with 2-OI-85.

2 Documentation of Peer Check by a second qualified member of the plant staff (i.e., RE, STA OR UO) is required ONLY when the RWM is inoperable OR bypassed with core thermal power 10%.

3 Record the rod number and any problems encountered, as applicable.